This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Committee of the Whole/Documents/346 Island Highway – Community-Focused Redesign Presentation
Presentation

346 Island Highway – Community-Focused Redesign Presentation

October 14, 2025Pages 10–178 sections

Presentation materials outlining a mixed-use development proposal at 346 Island Highway featuring 91 homes and a medical clinic.

4,000 sq. ft. medical clinic91 total homes (7 townhomes, 84 apartments)Shell value: $2.5 millionFully finished value: $3 million130 total vehicle parking spaces

346 Island Highway – Community-Focused Redesign

Delivering 4,000 sq. ft. of Medical Clinic Space at No Upfront Cost to Taxpayers

What’s New

  • Proposal redesigned in direct response to Council’s feedback
  • Incorporates 6,000 sq. ft. commercial, anchored by a 4,000 sq. ft. medical clinic
  • No upfront cost to the Town of View Royal
  • No requirement for taxpayers to subsidize the clinic while addressing urgent healthcare needs

The Investment

  • 4,000 sq. ft. “sweet spot” clinic size
  • Shell value: $2.5 million
  • Fully finished value: $3 million (excludes equipment & furnishings)
  • Clinic operator responsible for its own equipment, supplies, and furnishings

Pathways for Ownership / Lease

  1. Ownership Through Municipal Cost Offsets (No Direct Municipal Expenditure)

    • Waive CACs (est. $364,000)
    • Waive DCCs (est. $592,000)
    • Waive Building Permit charges (est. $500,000)
    • Waive off-site improvement requirements
    • Acquire a mortgage for the shortfall
  2. Ownership Through Property Tax Program (Esquimalt Model)

    • Developer pays property taxes based on pre-rezoned BC Assessment value
    • Property taxes increase each year for 20 years, reaching full market value
    • No loss of current municipal revenue
    • View Royal gains ownership of a valuable clinic asset
  3. Lease Option Through Property Tax Program

    • Lease space for a set term, offset by property tax revenues
    • Similar short-term outcome, but no long-term ownership benefit

Summary This proposal delivers up to $3 million in community benefit, giving Council three clear options:

Option 1 – Ownership Through Municipal Cost Offsets Option 2 – Ownership Through Property Tax Program Option 3 – Lease Option Through Property Tax Program

Each path secures a much-needed medical clinic for View Royal without upfront taxpayer cost — while building long-term value for the community.

Page 10–17

346 Island Highway - Location Map

Aerial view location map of 346 Island Highway with the project site outlined in yellow
Aerial view location map of 346 Island Highway with the project site outlined in yellow
Page 10–17

346 Island Highway – A Community-Focused Redesign

  • Completely redesigned development with a fresh entrance and improved integration into the community
  • Aesthetics designed to harmonize with the community, reflecting the same architectural character and quality previously approved for 339 Island Highway across the street
  • Directly responds to Council’s feedback and community needs
  • Provides critical services at no upfront taxpayer cost
  • A better fit for View Royal: balancing residential, commercial, and community wellness

“A smarter, healthier, community-driven development for View Royal.”

Page 10–17

346 Island Hwy

SITE AREA: 3,855.78 sq. m. / 41,503.01 sq. ft.

BUILDING HEIGHT: 6 Storeys

BUILDING DENSITY: +/-2.40 FAR 9,255.52 Sq.m. / 99,625.06 Sq.ft.

Conforms to existing OCP land use and density requirements

Architectural rendering of the proposed 6-storey mixed-use building at 346 Island Hwy
Architectural rendering of the proposed 6-storey mixed-use building at 346 Island Hwy

NUMBER OF HOMES: 91

UNIT MIX:

Unit Type Count Percentage
Townhomes 7 7.6%
1 Bedroom 50 54.95%
1 Bedroom + Den 16 17.58%
2 Bedroom 16 17.58%
2 Bedroom + Den 2 2.20%

VEHICLE PARKING:

  • 100 residential (underground)
  • 24 commercial (surface)
  • 6 visitor (surface)

BICYCLE PARKING:

  • 6 short Term
  • 90 long Term
Page 10–17

346 Island Highway - Traffic Solutions

Explored alternatives

  • Discussions held with Kislingbury adjacent properties
  • Discussions held with RV Park about shared entrance
  • Determined not economically feasible after thorough review

Traffic study supports proposed entrance

  • Safe and efficient access validated by professional review
  • Includes a center/left-hand turning lane for smoother flow and reduced congestion

“Balanced, practical design: safe access, efficient traffic flow, and parking that works for everyone”.

Page 10–17

Site Plan

Commercial Space / Medical Clinic

  • Consistent with current OCP density and land use
  • Incorporates 6,000 sq. ft. of commercial space, anchored by a 4,000 sq. ft. medical clinic
  • Additional 2,000 sq. ft. available for ancillary clinic uses or a community-serving use (e.g., coffee shop)
  • Clinic space designed at the “sweet spot” size for effective healthcare delivery

Parking Strategy

  • Surface parking dedicated for commercial and medical visitors
  • Underground parking provided for all residential units
  • Ensures safe, accessible, and separated parking for both residents and commercial visitors
Ground floor site plan illustrating commercial areas, lobby, and surface parking layout
Ground floor site plan illustrating commercial areas, lobby, and surface parking layout
Page 10–17

Medical Clinic Discussion

Option 1 – Cost Offsets to Ownership

  • Waive CACs (approx. $364,000)
  • DCCs (approx. $592,000)
  • Building permit fees (approx. $500,000)
  • No requirement for off-site works
  • Mortgage for shortfall

Option 2 – Property Tax Relief Ownership Option

  • Esquimalt model: gradual increases over 17 years
  • No lost revenue; Town gains income-producing asset

Option 3 – Property Tax Relief Lease Option

  • Lease offset by property tax revenues
  • Short-term benefit, no long-term ownership benefit
Page 10–17

Discussion Questions for Council

  • Do you support securing clinic space at no cost to taxpayers?
  • If yes, which of the three delivery options do you prefer (please number in order of preference)?
    • Option 1 – Ownership Through Municipal Cost Offsets
    • Option 2 – Ownership Through Property Tax Program
    • Option 3 – Lease Option Through Property Tax Program
  • Are there any specific concerns or issues you would like us to address?
  • Given that this mixed-use development fully aligns with the current OCP, is it one you are prepared to support?
Page 10–17
Extracted from: 2025 10 14 Committee of the Whole Agenda - Agenda - Pdf