Correspondence: Email thread between James Davison and Whitney Garside

Whitney Garside

From: James Davison [JDavison@viewroyal.ca] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 10:11 AM To: Subject: RE: 138 St. Giles - DFO

Hi Whitney,

Regarding the variance and the future subdivision, the required lot width on the proposed lot 1 would be 10m. I don't believe our Director (who is also our subdivision approving officer) would allow that – never mind what Council will approve. It's not going to be supported by staff in the current configuration, and such would have very little chance of approval. We do not permit panhandle development and that's getting to be essentially a panhandle lot with one house forward and one back. I think if you want any chance of approval you'll need to split it straight down the middle. I understand your rationale for wanting it in its current configuration, but from a neighbourhood point of view we want consistency with the other lots on the street.

Let me know what you want to do.

Regards, James.

---

From: Whitney Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 3:21 PM To: James Davison Subject: Re: 138 St. Giles - DFO

Hi James, its sewer services down by the water. Do you want me to get you site plans? I don't have one emailable but I can contact my surveyor and see what we can get you.

Thanks, Whitney Sent from my BlackBerry

---

From: James Davison JDavison@viewroyal.ca Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:24:07 -0700 To: 'Whitney Garside' Subject: RE: 138 St. Giles - DFO

Great, thanks.

---

From: Whitney Garside Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 2:22 PM To: James Davison Subject: 138 St. Giles - DFO

Hi James,

For your files, I have submitted an Operational Statement to the DFO and attached it for your file. It states below that I will not receive further comment from them unless they have questions about my planned project, work or activity.

I have also been in contact with CRD and they will be getting back to me.