This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Council Meeting/Documents/Presentation: 346 Island Highway - A Community-Focused Redesign
Presentation

Presentation: 346 Island Highway - A Community-Focused Redesign

November 18, 2025Pages 170–1767 sections

Visual presentation detailing unit mix, traffic solutions, and ownership models for the medical clinic proposal.

14.a.2 Medical Services Proposal - 346 Island Highway - Councillor Rogers
91 homes total100 residential underground parking spaces6 storeys

346 Island Highway - Location Map

Aerial location map of 346 Island Highway showing the property boundaries outlined in yellow
Aerial location map of 346 Island Highway showing the property boundaries outlined in yellow
Page 170–176

346 Island Highway – A Community-Focused Redesign

  • Completely redesigned development with a fresh entrance and improved integration into the community
  • Aesthetics designed to harmonize with the community, reflecting the same architectural character and quality previously approved for 339 Island Highway across the street
  • Directly responds to Council’s feedback and community needs
  • Provides critical services at no upfront taxpayer cost
  • A better fit for View Royal: balancing residential, commercial, and community wellness

“A smarter, healthier, community-driven development for View Royal.”

Page 170–176

346 Island Hwy

Architectural rendering of the proposed six-storey mixed-use development
Architectural rendering of the proposed six-storey mixed-use development

SITE AREA: 3,855.78 sq. m. / 41,503.01 sq. ft.

BUILDING HEIGHT: 6 Storeys

BUILDING DENSITY: +/- 2.40 FAR 9,255.52 Sq. m. / 99,625.06 Sq. ft.

Conforms to existing OCP land use and density requirements

NUMBER OF HOMES: 91

UNIT MIX:

Unit Type Count Percentage
Townhomes 7 7.6%
1 Bedroom 50 54.95%
1 Bedroom + Den 16 17.58%
2 Bedroom 16 17.58%
2 Bedroom + Den 2 2.20%

VEHICLE PARKING:

  • 100 residential (underground)
  • 24 commercial (surface)
  • 6 visitor (surface)

BICYCLE PARKING:

  • 6 short Term
  • 90 long Term
Page 170–176

346 Island Highway - Traffic Solutions

Explored alternatives

  • Discussions held with Kislingbury adjacent properties
  • Discussions held with RV Park about shared entrance
  • Determined not economically feasible after thorough review

Traffic study supports proposed entrance

  • Safe and efficient access validated by professional review
  • Includes a center/left-hand turning lane for smoother flow and reduced congestion

“Balanced, practical design: safe access, efficient traffic flow, and parking that works for everyone”.

Page 170–176

Site Plan

Ground level site plan showing commercial spaces, lobby, and surface parking layout
Ground level site plan showing commercial spaces, lobby, and surface parking layout

Commercial Space / Medical Clinic

  • Consistent with current OCP density and land use
  • Incorporates 6,000 sq. ft. of commercial space, anchored by a 4,000 sq. ft. medical clinic
  • Additional 2,000 sq. ft. available for ancillary clinic uses or a community-serving use (e.g., coffee shop)
  • Clinic space designed at the “sweet spot” size for effective healthcare delivery

Parking Strategy

  • Surface parking dedicated for commercial and medical visitors
  • Underground parking provided for all residential units
  • Ensures safe, accessible, and separated parking for both residents and commercial visitors
Page 170–176

Medical Clinic Discussion

Option 1 – Cost Offsets to Ownership

  • Waive CACs (approx. $364,000)
  • DCCs (approx. $592,000)
  • Building permit fees (approx. $500,000)
  • No requirement for off-site works
  • Mortgage for shortfall

Option 2 – Property Tax Relief Ownership Option

  • Esquimalt model: gradual increases over 17 years
  • No lost revenue; Town gains income-producing asset

Option 3 – Property Tax Relief Lease Option

  • Lease offset by property tax revenues
  • Short-term benefit, no long-term ownership
Page 170–176

Discussion Questions for Council

  • Do you support securing clinic space at no cost to taxpayers?
  • If yes, which of the three delivery options do you prefer (please number in order of preference)?
    • Option 1 – Ownership Through Municipal Cost Offsets
    • Option 2 – Ownership Through Property Tax Program
    • Option 3 – Lease Option Through Property Tax Program
  • Are there any specific concerns or issues you would like us to address?
  • Given that this mixed-use development fully aligns with the current OCP, is it one you are prepared to support?
Page 170–176
Extracted from: 2025 11 18 Council Agenda - Agenda - Pdf