This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Council Meeting/Documents/Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report (Form 1)
Form

Riparian Areas Regulation - Qualified Environmental Professional - Assessment Report (Form 1)

September 1, 2015Pages 159–1682 sections

An environmental assessment report regarding the Craigflower Creek Riparian Area at the Fort Victoria RV Park, providing professional opinions and site photos.

July 21, 2015356 Island HighwayFort Victoria RV Park & CampgroundWm. Patrick Lucey R.P.Bio.
Photograph of the western edge of the subject property showing bank modifications with large boulders along the south bank of Craigflower Creek.
Photograph of the western edge of the subject property showing bank modifications with large boulders along the south bank of Craigflower Creek.

Figure 12. The western edge of the subject property, and the upstream section of our assessment area begins to show evidence of bank modifications with large boulders along the south bank. The photographer is standing on the south bank at the property boundary between the RV Park and Adam’s storage and facing downstream.

Photograph facing upstream from the same location as Figure 12, showing the north bank constrained by construction related to the Trans Canada Highway.
Photograph facing upstream from the same location as Figure 12, showing the north bank constrained by construction related to the Trans Canada Highway.

Figure 13. Facing upstream from the same location as Figure 12. The north bank has been heavily modified from the construction of the Trans Canada Highway. Craigflower Creek is constrained to its channel this area.

Photograph looking upstream from the north bank of Craigflower Creek showing modified banks.
Photograph looking upstream from the north bank of Craigflower Creek showing modified banks.

Figure 14. Looking upstream from the north bank in the same area as Figure 12 and Figure 13. The south bank has also been modified as a result of historic land use activities.

Photograph of a mowed floodplain terrace used for recreational space, with a wall of vegetation separating it from the creek.
Photograph of a mowed floodplain terrace used for recreational space, with a wall of vegetation separating it from the creek.

Figure 15. Looking west along the old floodplain terrace is currently being mowed and used as recreational space. This terrace is also the location of a CRD sewer main RoW. The large wall of vegetation to the right separates this area from Craigflower Creek. Storage containers on the neighbouring property to the west can be seen in the background.

Photograph of a mowed lawn area extending to the edge of Craigflower Creek near the eastern property boundary.
Photograph of a mowed lawn area extending to the edge of Craigflower Creek near the eastern property boundary.

Figure 16. The mowed lawn area extends down to Craigflower Creek in one location near the eastern property boundary. There is some evidence of trampling impacts in this location.

Photograph showing an example of trampling along the eastern property boundary adjacent to the creek, with a yellow arrow highlighting the impact.
Photograph showing an example of trampling along the eastern property boundary adjacent to the creek, with a yellow arrow highlighting the impact.

Figure 17. Example of trampling along the eastern property boundary adjacent to Craigflower Creek (yellow arrow).

Photograph of a gravel fill area encroaching into the Streamside Protection and Enhancement Area (SPEA) on the northwestern edge of the property.
Photograph of a gravel fill area encroaching into the Streamside Protection and Enhancement Area (SPEA) on the northwestern edge of the property.

Figure 18. An image of the fill area that is encroaching into the SPEA on the northwestern edge of the subject property. The large coniferous trees in the background approximately mark the location of Craigflower Creek.

Photograph showing the fill slope from the old floodplain terrace, primarily composed of rock and covered with brush.
Photograph showing the fill slope from the old floodplain terrace, primarily composed of rock and covered with brush.

Figure 19. A view of the fill slope from the old floodplain terrace. The fill is primarily rock but any exposed soils have been covered with brush.

Photograph looking east across the fill slope with survey lines indicating the edge of the 22.5 metre SPEA and the extent of fill material to be removed.
Photograph looking east across the fill slope with survey lines indicating the edge of the 22.5 metre SPEA and the extent of fill material to be removed.

Figure 20. Looking east across the fill slope. The dashed line is the surveyed edge of the 22.5 metre SPEA. The solid, double arrow-headed line is approximately 6 metres from the toe-of-slope of the fill intrusion south to the edge of the SPEA. This is the extent of the fill material that must be removed. As noted in the text of this document the reshaping of the slope can be accomplished using a variety of slope configurations, which can be selected at the discretion of the property owner.

Figure 21. Aerial photograph showing the approximate location of the terraced top-of-bank prior to the infilling of material within the 22.5 metre SPEA zone. Note the minor extension of the terraced footprint by the fill material as shown by the solid yellow line. The solid yellow line is the approximate edge of the SPEA.

Figure 22. Looking south along the property boundary with the adjacent Storage facility. This rock stack wall must be left intact as it provides a stable barrier behind which the fill material is maintained. This edge is approximately aligned with the original terraced side slope, present on the property prior to the infilling of material to establish a stable, flat, all-season working surface. This filled terrace lies outside the 30 metre RAA.

Figure 23. Looking southwest across the fill terrace.

Figure 24. Looking northwest across the fill terrace.

Page 159–168

7. Professional Opinion

Assessment Report Professional Opinion on the Development Proposal's riparian area.

Date July 21, 2015

  1. I/We Wm. Patrick Lucey R.P.Bio.

Please list name(s) of qualified environmental professional(s) and their professional designation that are involved in assessment.

hereby certify that: a) I am/We are qualified environmental professional(s), as defined in the Riparian Areas Regulation made under the Fish Protection Act; b) I am/We are qualified to carry out the assessment of the proposal made by the developer Goodwill Investments Ltd., which proposal is described in section 3 of this Assessment Report (the “development proposal”); c) I have/We have carried out an assessment of the development proposal and my/our assessment is set out in this Assessment Report; and d) In carrying out my/our assessment of the development proposal, I have/We have followed the assessment methods set out in the Schedule to the Riparian Areas Regulation; AND

  1. As qualified environmental professional(s), I/we hereby provide my/our professional opinion that: a) [ ] if the development is implemented as proposed by the development proposal there will be no harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of natural features, functions and conditions that support fish life processes in the riparian assessment area in which the development is proposed, OR (Note: include local government flex letter, DFO Letter of Advice, or description of how DFO local variance protocol is being addressed) b) [X] if the streamside protection and enhancement areas identified in this Assessment Report are protected from the development proposed by the development proposal and the measures identified in this Assessment Report as necessary to protect the integrity of those areas from the effects of the development are implemented by the developer, there will be no harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of natural features, functions and conditions that support fish life processes in the riparian assessment area in which the development is proposed.

[NOTE: "qualified environmental professional" means an applied scientist or technologist, acting alone or together with another qualified environmental professional, if (a) the individual is registered and in good standing in British Columbia with an appropriate professional organization constituted under an Act, acting under that association's code of ethics and subject to disciplinary action by that association, (b) the individual's area of expertise is recognized in the assessment methods as one that is acceptable for the purpose of providing all or part of an assessment report in respect of that development proposal, and (c) the individual is acting within that individual's area of expertise.

Page 159–168

Document Images

(1)
Document image
Extracted from: 2015 09 01 Council Agenda