This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Committee of the Whole/Documents/Tree Resource Spreadsheets and Site Mapping
Appendix

Tree Resource Spreadsheets and Site Mapping

March 11, 2014Pages 189–1974 sections

Detailed technical data for every significant tree on the property and protection fencing diagrams.

2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
26 tagged trees listed

November 27, 2013

Page 189–197

TREE RESOURCE

Tagged, bylaw-protected trees 256 and 258 Plowright Road

Tree Resource Table - Page 1
Tree Resource Table - Page 1
Tree # d.b.h. (cm) CRZ Species Condition Health Condition Structure Relative Tolerance Remarks / Recommendations
436 51 6.0 Douglas-fir good fair poor Topped historically, multiple growth leaders arise from topping location. Recent limb failure. Recently impacted by construction on adjacent property.
437 47 6.0 Douglas-fir good fair poor Topped historically, multiple growth leaders arise from topping location. Recent limb failure. Recently impacted by construction on adjacent property.
446 2x28, 1x33 6.0 Garry oak fair good good Multiple stemmed oak tree located along the property boundary. Some deadwood and health stress visible in canopy.
443, 444, 445 17/25/3 1/38 8.0 Garry oak fair fair good Grouping of oak stems that grow from one root mass. Some deadwood and health stress visible in canopy. Two small stems are dead.
438 17 2.0 Garry oak fair fair good Asymmetric form due to shading from adjacent tree. Some backfill from neighbouring property over root system.
439 26/32/3 3/33 8.0 Garry oak poor poor good Declining health. Little annual growth of the shoots and leaders. Cankers along trunk. Multiple stems with narrow angles of attachment and weakness at the stem unions.
440 28/30/4 5 8.0 Garry oak fair good good Multiple stems. Large deadwood in canopy.
441 1x12, 2x24, 3x20 8.0 Garry oak fair fair good
442 20/20 4.0 Garry oak fair fair good Deep backfill placed around tree historically. Recent fill material placed in tree well.
Tree Resource Table - Page 2
Tree Resource Table - Page 2
Tree # d.b.h. (cm) CRZ Species Condition Health Condition Structure Relative Tolerance Remarks / Recommendations
453 22 3.0 Western Red cedar fair good poor Located along driveway
449 21 3.0 Douglas-fir good fair poor Located along driveway
454 16 3.0 Douglas-fir fair poor poor Poorly tappered, suppressed by adjacent trees. Located along driveway
455 25 3.5 Douglas-fir good fair poor Located along driveway
452 27 3.5 Douglas-fir good good poor Located along driveway
448 2x24 5.0 Western Red cedar good fair poor Two c-dominant stems. Located along driveway
413 33 3.5 Western Red cedar good poor poor Heavily topped historically
414 23 3.0 Western Red cedar good poor poor Heavily topped historically
416 35 4.0 Western Red cedar good poor poor Heavily topped historically
417 30 3.5 Douglas-fir good good poor Tag missing
Tree Resource Table - Page 3
Tree Resource Table - Page 3
Tree # d.b.h. (cm) CRZ Species Condition Health Condition Structure Relative Tolerance Remarks / Recommendations
418 32 3.5 Hemlock poor fair poor Nearly dead
419 56 8.0 Douglas-fir good fair poor
420 33 3.5 Western Red cedar good poor poor Tag missing
412 51 8.0 Douglas-fir good poor poor Topped historically,
421 35 4.0 Hemlock fair poor poor Topped historically
415 18 2.0 Western Red cedar fair poor poor Heavily topped historically
422 34 4.0 Western Red cedar good poor poor Heavily topped historically
423 30 3.5 Western Red cedar fair poor poor Some health stress Heavily topped historically
425 40 4.5 Douglas-fir good poor poor Heavily topped historically
431 35 4.0 Western Red cedar good poor poor Multiple stemmed. Heavily topped historically
Tree Resource Table - Page 4
Tree Resource Table - Page 4
Tree # d.b.h. (cm) CRZ Species Condition Health Condition Structure Relative Tolerance Remarks / Recommendations
432 multiple 4.0 Pine, Douglas-fir, Western Red cedar fair poor poor Eight heavily topped trees along rear property boundary. May include cedars #433, 428 and 424 whose tags were missing.
434 20 3.0 Western Red cedar good poor poor Heavily topped historically
435 24 3.5 Western Red cedar good poor poor Heavily topped historically
426 23 3.0 Grand Fir good good poor Poorly location for species, adjacent to house
429 27 3.5 Douglas-fir poor poor poor Health stress, recent fill on neighbours side. heavily topped historically
427 28 3.5 Douglas-fir fair poor poor Recent fill on neighbours side. heavily topped historically
459 24 3.5 Douglas-fir fair poor poor Heavily topped historically
464 15 2.0 apple fair fair moderate deadwood in canopy. Not bylaw-protected
458 35 4.0 apple fair poor moderate Cavity and decay in trunk
Tree Resource Table - Page 5
Tree Resource Table - Page 5
Tree # d.b.h. (cm) CRZ Species Condition Health Condition Structure Relative Tolerance Remarks / Recommendations
461 35 4.0 apple poor poor moderate Extremely decayed, almost dead
462 15 cherry poor fair moderate Nearly dead. Not bylaw-protected.
Page 189–197

Key to Headings in Resource Table

Key to Headings in Resource Table
Key to Headings in Resource Table
  • d.b.h.diameter at breast height - diameter of trunk, measured in centimetres at 1.4 metres above ground level
  • CRZcritical root zone - estimated optimal size of tree protection zone based on tree species, condition and age of specimen and the species tolerance to root disturbance. Indicates the radial distance from the trunk, measured in metres.
  • Condition health/structure
    • Good – no visible or minor health or structural flaw
    • Fair – health or structural flaw present that can be corrected through normal arboricultural or horticultural care.
    • Poor – significant health or structural defects that compromise the long-term survival or retention of the specimen.
  • Relative Tolerance – relative tolerance of the selected species to development impacts.
Page 189–197

TREE RESOURCE

bylaw-protected trees not identified by tag onsite 256 and 285 Plowright Road

Tree Resource Table (not identified by tag) - Page 7
Tree Resource Table (not identified by tag) - Page 7
Tree d.b.h. (cm) Crown Spread(m) Species Condition Health Condition Structure Relative Tolerance Remarks / Recommendations
1 multiple n/a Western Red cedar good poor poor Three trees growing in a short hedgerow to the west of the house at 258 Plowright. Topped heavily.
2 27 n/a Douglas-fir good poor poor Topped
3 multiple n/a Western Red cedar fair poor poor Three trees growing in a short hedgerow to the west of the house at 258 Plowright. Topped heavily.
4 multiple n/a Western Red cedar, Douglas-fir fair poor poor Six cedar and 3 Douglas-fir trees growing as a hedgerow. Topped historically.
5 45 n/a Douglas-fir good poor poor Topped historically
6 multiple n/a Western Red cedar, Douglas-fir fair poor poor Six cedar and 3 Douglas-fir trees growing as a hedgerow. Topped historically.
7 multiple n/a Western Red cedar, Douglas-fir, good poor poor Three cedar, and eleven Douglas-fir trees growing as a hedgerow. Topped historically.
8 multiple n/a Western Red cedar, good poor poor Five Western Red cedar. Topped historically
9 multiple n/a Western Red cedar fair poor poor Fifteen topped cedar trees growing in a hedgerow along the edge of the driveway.
Site Plan of Proposed Strata Lots 1 to 4, Section 3, Esquimalt District, Strata Plan EPS
Site Plan of Proposed Strata Lots 1 to 4, Section 3, Esquimalt District, Strata Plan EPS
Detail Drawing E105 - Tree Protection Fencing
Detail Drawing E105 - Tree Protection Fencing

TREE PROTECTION FENCING

FENCE WILL BE CONTRUCTED USING 38 X 89 mm (2"X4") WOOD FRAME: TOP, BOTTOM AND POSTS. * USE ORANGE SNOW-FENCING MESH AND SECURE TO THE WOOD FRAME WITH "ZIP" TIES OR GALVANZIED STAPLES

  • IN ROCKY AREAS, METAL POSTS (T-BAR OR REBAR) DRILLED INTO ROCK WILL BE ACCEPTED

DETAIL NAME: TREE PROTECTION FENCING DATE: Oct 30/07 DRAWN: DM APP'D: RR SCALE: N.T.S. DRAWING: E105

Page 189–197
Extracted from: 2014 03 11 Committee of the Whole Agenda