This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Committee of the Whole/Documents/Staff Report: Helmcken Road/Watkiss Way Intersection Improvement Options
Staff Report

Staff Report: Helmcken Road/Watkiss Way Intersection Improvement Options

March 11, 2025Pages 183–1892 sections

A background report (originally from May 2024) analyzing multiple concept options to balance traffic flow and active transportation needs at the Helmcken and Watkiss intersection.

1 CALL TO ORDER
Date: April 30, 2024Recommended: 'Modified Option C02'Addresses traffic volumes of 12,000-16,300 vehicles per day on Helmcken Road$99,000 in funding available from the Aspire development requirements

TOWN OF VIEW ROYAL PUBLIC WORKS & TRANSPORTATION REPORT

TO: Committee of the Whole FROM: Ivan Leung, P.Eng Director of Engineering DATE: April 30, 2024 MEETING DATE: May 14, 2024

HELMCKEN ROAD/WATKISS WAY INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to:

  1. Inform the Committee of the Whole of potential options to improve the Helmcken Watkiss intersection for all road users;
  2. Recommend to the Committee of the Whole an option that reflects Town strategies, initiatives and past Council feedback.

OPTIONS:

Option
Option #1 (Recommended) THAT the Committee recommend to Council staff’s recommendation to proceed to the detail design for a “Modified Option C02” concept that includes the removal of the southbound Helmcken Road pinch point, the removal of the merge lane on northbound leg of intersection, and the installation of buffered bike lanes on both sides of Helmcken Road;

AND THAT staff monitor traffic impacts of the upcoming Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure’s Bus on Shoulder Project to inform on future concepts for future Helmcken Road upgrades (ATNP Action Item 1C and 1D).
Option #2 The Committee can suggest other options for staff to review before bringing forth to a future Council meeting.

TIME CRITICAL:

A decision point from the Committee and Council will allow staff to proceed with the detail design of the Helmcken Watkiss Intersection, scheduled for 2024 (Project Summary C-128).

ALIGNMENT WITH TOWN INITIATIVES:

The recommended option aligns with the following Town strategies and initiatives:

  • Strategic Plan (2023-2026): Goal 1: Shift primary transport mode within View Royal away from vehicles to walking, cycling and transit.
  • Active Transportation Network Plan (2023): Intersection is identified as a short-term priority for improvements (Action Items 1C, 1D and 2B).

BACKGROUND:

The Helmcken / Watkiss intersection is identified as a priority in the Active Transportation Network Plan (ATNP, Action Item 1D). The barriers to improve active travel within the intersection include:

  1. Congestion from high peak time traffic volumes. This significantly impacts intersection levels of service (12,000-16,300 vehicles per day on Helmcken Road, compounded with 8,000 vehicles per day on Watkiss Way);
  2. Inability to install leading pedestrian interval signals (“LPI’s”). LPI’s give pedestrians a head start before vehicular traffic proceeds into the intersection. This increases pedestrian visibility, presence and safety. However, due to the high traffic volumes, LPI’s at this intersection would cause additional congestion that would and spread its impact to surrounding intersections. This option is not recommended under current intersection configurations as a result;
  3. Inability to reduce pedestrian crossing distance. Reducing the pedestrian crossing distance is difficult given the vehicular demand on Helmcken Road and predominant influence of vehicular traffic.

Congestion from high traffic volumes is the main restrictor in improving active travel at the intersection.

As a result, further analysis is required due to the complex needs of the intersection. This is further compounded by the introduction of the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure’s (“MoTI”) Bus on Shoulders project. Staff subsequently retained a transportation engineer to develop viable options that improve and balance travel for all road users within and around the intersection.

DISCUSSION:

The impetus to improving active travel at this intersection is generally governed by two key design elements:

Description Benefit
Driver 1: Remove pinch point on Helmcken Road on the western leg of the intersection, allowing 2 lanes of vehicular traffic

Aerial view of intersection showing 'Remove Bulb' and 'Increases travel lane +1' annotations
Aerial view of intersection showing 'Remove Bulb' and 'Increases travel lane +1' annotations
• Significantly improves traffic flow
• Allows for LPI installations
• Recommended via previous traffic impact assessments
Driver 2: Remove the ‘merge’ lane on Helmcken Road at the northern leg of the intersection – merging to occur between the Helmcken Interchange and the Helmcken / Watkiss intersection

Aerial view of Helmcken Rd intersection showing 'Vehicle lane (deleted merge lane)', 'Reduced Vehicular Conflict Zone', 'Buffered bike lane', and 'Shift curb = shorter crossing distance' annotations
Aerial view of Helmcken Rd intersection showing 'Vehicle lane (deleted merge lane)', 'Reduced Vehicular Conflict Zone', 'Buffered bike lane', and 'Shift curb = shorter crossing distance' annotations
• Reduction in pedestrian and cyclist crossing distance
• Significant reduction in vehicular conflict area (1 lane less)

There also exists a third driver to improved active travel through the intersection, although not recommended at this time:

  • remove the right turn slip lane on the Eagle Creek corner of the intersection, resulting in significantly reducing vehicular conflict zones;
  • add multi-use paths or equivalent off-street pedestrian and cycling infrastructure for southbound Helmcken Rd (required to optimize new curb alignment).
Aerial view diagram of intersection showing proposed Multi Use Path or Sidewalk + Raised Bike Lane, Pedestrian & Cyclist Crossing, and Additional Refuge area for Pedestrians and cyclists
Aerial view diagram of intersection showing proposed Multi Use Path or Sidewalk + Raised Bike Lane, Pedestrian & Cyclist Crossing, and Additional Refuge area for Pedestrians and cyclists

While there are significant benefits to incorporating this option, there are three trade-offs to consider, including:

  1. Helmcken Road is active with emergency responders, given its proximity to Victoria General Hospital. Staff will be engaging with emergency service stakeholders as part of the detail design because there may be a requirement to keep the pavement width as is to allow for emergency vehicles to pass by pulled over traffic.
  2. The Committee will need to consider whether to accept multi-use paths within the road corridor. While multi use paths are an appropriate design element and identified in the ATNP, Council has expressed concerns in the past regarding conflicts between cyclists and pedestrians;
  3. This intersection is but a small piece to the Helmcken Road corridor that has been identified as a top three priority for improvement in the ATNP. Furthermore, a moderate change in traffic patterns and road alignment will occur as part of MoTI’s Bus on Shoulder project (currently in its detail design phase). In other words, much is planned in the future for Helmcken Road from the Saanich Border to Vickery Road that presents traffic behavior that is unknown today.

As a result, staff recommend this third option be deferred to the future. The benefit of this is that staff will be able to better assess Helmcken Road once new traffic patterns emerge from MoTI’s Bus on Shoulders project. This revised assessment would help inform staff and Council on how to proceed with improvements to the Helmcken Road corridor (Action Item 1C of the ATNP, which offers a range of options including vehicular lane closures, multi use paths and/or buffered bike lanes). This in turn would confirm to staff what design palette to utilize to utilize for this third driver (e.g. raised bike lane vs multi use path vs buffered bike lane).

Concept & Recommendation

It should be noted that there are numerous configurations that can utilize a combination of the design drivers noted above. For ease of the concept design exercise, the transportation engineer has developed three distinct options (Attachment 1), of which can be modified:

Page 183–189
Option Description Drivers Used
C01 Minimal improvements: removal of southbound Helmcken pinch point #1
C02 Moderate improvements: removal of southbound Helmcken pinch point and removal of merge lane on northbound leg of intersection. Installation of buffered bike lane and/or multi-use paths. #1, #2
C03 Major improvements: removal of southbound Helmcken pinch point, removal of merge lane on northbound leg of intersection and reconfiguration of the Eagle Creek corner of the intersection. Installation of buffered bike lane and/or multi-use paths #1, #2, #3

For the purposes of this intersection project, staff recommend the following modified option:

Option Description Drivers Used
C02 (Modified) Moderate improvements: removal of southbound Helmcken pinch point and removal of merge lane on northbound leg of intersection. Installation of buffered bike lanes on both sides of Helmcken Road. Potential “green paint” crossing to enhance pedestrian and cyclist crossing of Helmcken Road. #1, #2

The benefits of this modified C02 concept are:

  • It provides moderate separation of cyclists from vehicular traffic;
  • It shortens pedestrian crossing distance and vehicular conflict areas across Helmcken Road;
  • It allows for LPI signal timing to further improve pedestrian and cyclist accessibility and safety;
  • Its costs are not as extreme as Option C03;
  • It allows staff to gather data after the MoTI Bus on Shoulders project to inform on whether additional enhancements are warranted (ATNP Action Item 1C).

Queues are expected to increase for northbound Helmcken traffic. However, the queue times are not substantial (approx. 20s per the traffic review), and the queue length would not be so long as to impact the duel left turn lane accessibility. Staff have consulted with MoTI on these options, whom look forward to the Town’s next steps.

DESIGN RISK MANAGEMENT:

The recommended option, being that it is still in its concept phase, is still subject to risks. Below are known project risks followed by mitigation measures that have been completed and/or in progress by staff:

Risk Risk Probability / Magnitude Mitigative Measures
MoTI approval requires substantive change to concept (MoTI owns Helmcken Road south of the intersection) Low / Moderate Staff have already engaged MoTI whom are generally in favour with the concepts, especially the multi use path. Buffered bike lanes are not common on MoTI roadways and staff will continue to work with MoTI during the design stage to consider the approval of buffered bike lanes.
BC Transit approval requires substantive change to concept Low / Moderate Turning movements will not see substantive change and should accommodate current and future buses. Staff will continue to engage BC Transit as part of the detail design stage.
Emergency service stakeholder approval require substantive change to concept Moderate / Moderate Travel lanes can be widened to allow for emergency vehicles to safely pass pulled over vehicles (narrowing of median). Staff will engage emergency service stakeholders as part of the detail design stage.
District of Saanich concerns Low / Low Saanich staff are very much interested in this project as it will improve traffic along Wilkinson Road.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:

At a high level, the Modified C02 concept will be moderately priced to construct, but not extraordinary. Most of the costs are likely attributed to underground utility, traffic signal upgrades and median work. Orders of magnitude estimates will be more apparent as part of the detailed design phase (2024).

There are also two forms of outside funding that will be available to the project:

  • About $99,000 will be available as part of the development requirements of the Aspire project
  • There has been development interest for the property at the southeast corner of the intersection (Helmcken Market). The development would be required to install the requisite upgrades directly fronting its property.

CONCURRENCE:

Initials Comments
Chief Administrative Officer SS I concur with the recommendation.

REVIEWED BY:

Initials
Director of Corporate Administration N/A
Director of Finance N/A
Director of Development Services N/A
Director of Engineering and Parks IL
Director of Protective Services N/A

ATTACHMENTS:

  1. Intersection Options
Page 183–189

Document Images

(1)
Document image
Extracted from: 2025 03 11 Committee of the Whole Agenda - Agenda - Pdf