This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Back to Meetings

Committee of the Whole

Tuesday, April 11, 2023
Council
AgendaMinutesVideo
Updated 2 months ago
Connecting to video

Meeting Overview

The Committee of the Whole meeting focused heavily on financial planning, transportation infrastructure, and public safety priorities. Council approved amendments to the 2023-2027 Financial Plan, including allocating the $4.665 million Growing Communities Fund to reserve, and setting the 2023 municipal tax rates based on Scenario A (unchanged ratios). A key decision was approving a $30,000 grant-in-aid for the View Royal Reading Centre. Delegations provided updates on major regional projects: BC Transit's Island Highway Rapid Transit launch and MoTI's Highway 1 Bus on Shoulder project. Discussion on the draft Active Transportation Network Plan highlighted the need to balance cycling infrastructure against existing traffic congestion and pedestrian safety concerns.

Key Decisions

  • Council approved a reduced grant amount of $30,000 for the View Royal Reading Centre, instead of the $38,000 requested.
  • The verbal update provided by the West Shore RCMP Superintendent was formally received by the Committee.
  • The monthly Building Department Report was received for information.
  • Council recommended organizing a spring flower garden contest and a fall Halloween decorating contest.
  • The action list update for the first quarter was received for information.
23
Agenda Items
20/20
Motions Passed
5h 34m
Duration
26
Participants

Transcript

2715 segments
Sid Tobias0:00

Good afternoon, viewer oil.

Sid Tobias0:01

I'd like to call the meeting of the Committee the Whole to order for Tuesday, April 11th, 2023.

Sid Tobias0:10

This committee of the whole meeting recognizes the Lukong speaking people known today as the Esquimalt Nation and the Songhees Nation and their historic connections to these land that continue to this day.

Sid Tobias0:22

This afternoon we'll hear from the public during the public participation portion of the agenda, and this evening we'll hear from the public during the public participation and question period portions of the agenda.

Sid Tobias0:34

For members of the audience, the council is a safe, respectful, and inclusive space.

Sid Tobias0:40

Just uh uh encouraging you to um to follow the utmost in decorum when other folks are speaking and allow them to have an open and impartial form.

Sid Tobias0:55

For those participating by telephone, if you wish to provide comments, call 778-282-828-27.

Sid Tobias1:02

And when prompted, enter conference ID 202-538-877-pound.

Sid Tobias1:09

At that time in the agenda, I will then announce the last four digits of your phone number.

Sid Tobias1:16

Ask you to mute the live webcast to avoid feedback.

Sid Tobias1:21

Ask you to not use your speech speaker phone to ensure sound quality, and then ask that you unmute yourself by pressing star six.

Sid Tobias1:29

To begin, please indicate your name and address for the record, whether you're speaking uh by phone or present.

Sid Tobias1:37

Uh, speakers will have five minutes each during the public participation period and two minutes to ask a question during question period.

Sid Tobias1:46

Uh, this meeting will be recorded, and by participating in the this webcast, you are consenting to being recorded, and recording will be available on the town's website for future access.

Sid Tobias2:02

Can I I think there's some discussion about the agenda before I start because somebody told me, and there's a late item on the blue sheet that councilor McKenzie will speak to that falls under your area, Counselor Lemon in Arts and Culture, for a spring uh and fall community building event.

Sid Tobias2:22

But I know that you had uh potentially another amendment that you would like to do to the agenda.

Gery Lemon2:28

Yeah, if I may.

Gery Lemon2:29

Thank you, Mitch Bess.

Gery Lemon2:29

Um, just a small amendment and then a slightly bigger amendment.

Gery Lemon2:37

Um the per first is that in the uh petitions and delegations, Christine Jackman from the Reading Center will be joined at the podium during her presentation by Jim Powell, and they're going to um do double duty at the podium.

Gery Lemon2:53

And the second is um uh I would like to add, with council's indulgence, that uh an opportunity for council to consider the request by the reading center at in tonight's meeting.

Gery Lemon3:13

It's not on the agenda.

Gery Lemon3:15

And I would like to see it discussed tonight rather than delayed to a future agenda.

Gery Lemon3:21

Future meeting.

Sid Tobias3:23

Thank you, Councillor Lemon.

Sid Tobias3:25

And I would uh ask you to per to coordinate that motion at the right uh time, should it occur this evening.

Sid Tobias3:32

So we were going to add some uh after the petitions and delegations, um, which normally just doesn't have an action on it.

Sid Tobias3:42

Um we want to have a bit of a discussion about the funding for it.

Sid Tobias3:48

Sarah, looking to you for some advice on where to add that in.

Gery Lemon3:56

It can occur right after the petition and delegation is fine.

Gery Lemon3:59

Thank you.

Gery Lemon4:01

Perfect.

Sid Tobias4:03

Was there anything else, Councilor Lemon?

Sid Tobias4:05

Does any other member of the council wanted to amend the um agenda as we've discussed?

Sid Tobias4:13

So we're including the blue sheets with Councilor McKenzie's, the correspondence on it, plus uh the addition of Mr.

Sid Tobias4:22

Jim Powell for petitions and delegations, and an opportunity to discuss uh the grant and aid request as well.

Sid Tobias4:30

Can I get a motion to approve that agenda?

Sid Tobias4:33

Councillor Brown, seconded by Councillor Rogers.

Sid Tobias4:36

All in favor, none opposed.

Sid Tobias4:40

Motion carries.

Sid Tobias4:42

And uh can I get a motion to adopt the minutes of the previous meeting, which is from March 14th, 2020.

Sid Tobias4:50

Move adoption.

Sid Tobias4:51

Second.

Sid Tobias4:52

Moved by Councillor Rogers, seconded by Councillor Lemon.

Sid Tobias4:57

All in favor.

Sid Tobias4:59

None opposed.

Sid Tobias5:01

And now we are down to petitions and delegations.

Sid Tobias5:05

So I'd like to invite uh Christian Jackman and Mr.

Sid Tobias5:10

Jim Powell for a presentation.

Sid Tobias5:13

Thank you.

J. Powell5:23

Good afternoon, uh ladies and gentlemen of council.

J. Powell5:27

My name is Jim Powell.

J. Powell5:28

I live at 140 St.

J. Powell5:30

Giles Street in View Royal.

J. Powell5:32

I'm not a member of the View Royal Reading Center board, nor have they asked me to make a presentation to council.

J. Powell5:42

However, I was the chairman of the View Royal Public Library, the View Royal Reading Center from 2001 to 2010.

J. Powell5:53

And I thought a brief history of the library to the new members of council would be useful for your deliberations.

J. Powell6:02

The View Royal Library opened in 1943 as a bookmobile operating out of the what is now the community center in the lower level where the fire hall used to be.

J. Powell6:17

The town of View Royal was incorporated, as you know, in December 1988, some 45 years after the library.

J. Powell6:26

The View Royal Public Library was incorporated in May 1989, so the following year, five months.

J. Powell6:35

It was a public library of BC.

J. Powell6:42

In 1995 or thereabouts, the town of View Royal invited the library and the RCMP to be equal participants in the building of a town hall called a multi-use facility.

J. Powell6:56

To that end, View Royal Public Library applied for a BC21 grant of $287,400 to be applied to the town of View Royal for an equal share in the building.

J. Powell7:13

There is some dispute, and we could not confirm whether that grant was ever made, but the building was built, so the money came from somewhere.

J. Powell7:35

We were given a 10-year lease at effectively zero rent.

J. Powell7:40

It was a $15,000 grant, $15,000 rent, plus we got $22,000 from the Public Library Service to operate the library.

J. Powell7:52

In 2002, View Royal joined the Greater Victoria Public Library as part of the casino settlement with the other municipalities.

J. Powell8:04

View Royal Public Library then lost their library services grant of $22,000, but eventually that was split with the Greater Victoria Library some years later.

J. Powell8:16

The town covered the rent as before, plus, they gave a grant an aid of $7,000 from casino revenues to operate the library.

J. Powell8:25

And View Royal Public Library continued as a public library while negotiating with the town and library service branch.

J. Powell8:35

On the 8th of November 2007, the View Royal Public Library Board dissolved the public library and became the View Royal Reading Center with resources, their revenues and expenses as a public library, but it resolved the question of whether we could have two public libraries in View Royal.

J. Powell9:02

In a month after that, the View Royal Reading Center received a notice from the town of View Royal to vacate the building.

J. Powell9:11

After protracted negotiations with the CAO, it resulted in the town offering to pay rent and obtain space in the Admiral's Walk Shopping Center.

J. Powell9:24

The library services grant still covered the book, and as before, the rent funding was from casino revenues.

J. Powell9:32

In May of 2008, the View Royal Reading Center opened in Admiral's Walk.

J. Powell9:37

It was good publicity for the town and for the reading center.

J. Powell9:41

It was a convenient location, plenty of parking, and very handy for both Song Keys and his Claimont bands to use our resources.

J. Powell9:50

We had over 15,000 volumes, free internet, TV, uh DVDs, and movies for for rent.

J. Powell9:58

We had over 300 visits a month.

J. Powell10:01

And that was uh sometimes over a thousand books and and other articles taken from the library.

J. Powell10:08

And as an aside, the town had negotiated a reduced rent for Mrs.

J. Powell10:13

Campbell, uh, which made it affordable for us to rent there with the town grant.

J. Powell10:20

In March 2009, after becoming a reading center, the BC Liberals decided they didn't want reading centers and canceled all the grants for all the receiving all uh reading centers.

J. Powell10:34

About that time is when I left the board, so I really shouldn't say any more about the operations of the board, but I know that Mrs.

J. Powell10:42

Campbell died and the rent increase.

J. Powell10:46

The town grant uh got changed from uh the casino revenues to uh town uh finances, and then the lot the reading center then had to apply for a grant and aid to cover those same expenses, which they did, but because of the increased rent, they had to move to the location up on uh Island Highway, which is really not a desirable location, but it was what we could afford.

J. Powell11:20

I sometimes wonder whether we could reapply to the NDP government to see if the reading center grants could be reinstated, that would go a long way to helping the library.

J. Powell11:31

And to those who say that the library is duplicating services, that's not quite true because the library doesn't have a branch in View Royal.

J. Powell11:43

We can walk, we don't need to drive, we don't need to take the bus, we can go to our library by walking.

J. Powell11:52

The other thing is that the libraries are complementary, they don't really compete with one an author like Beldackey or anybody else and they retain all the copies.

J. Powell12:08

So that with some authors, we have 30 copies of the same of the same author's books.

J. Powell12:14

So if you go and you find out that you like Baldacci, but you just read the new one from the Greater Victoria Library, you can come to our library and read the other 19 in his collection.

J. Powell12:28

And besides, you don't have a one-year waiting list to get that book.

J. Powell12:34

I hope this information will help you view the View Royal Reading volunteer run, 80-year-old asset to our community, at least until there's a Greater Victoria Public Library Branch in View Royal.

J. Powell12:57

Thank you very much.

J. Powell12:59

Thank you for your service to the community.

Christine Jackman12:59

Hello, I'm Christine Jackman.

Christine Jackman13:06

I live at 755 Market Street in Victoria.

Christine Jackman13:09

I don't actually live in View Royal, but I'm the manager of the library.

Christine Jackman13:13

And I took over in 2015.

Christine Jackman13:17

So there's a five year gap between Jim and me.

Christine Jackman13:20

The manager before me was my mother, and some of you know her.

Christine Jackman13:25

And so yeah, we moved up to Island Highway.

Christine Jackman13:29

We had to reduce our uh books by about two thirds.

Christine Jackman13:35

Uh, we've had to get rid of the DVDs that we had for loan.

Christine Jackman13:38

We've had to get rid of the computers that we had for public internet because they were too old to be upgraded and we didn't have the budget to buy new ones.

Christine Jackman13:44

So pretty much all of our problems are because we don't have the budget.

Christine Jackman13:59

Last year we had 50 new members sign up.

Christine Jackman14:03

We have 846 active members in the library who visit regularly.

Christine Jackman14:10

Anybody who just happens to be walking by pops in and looks awkward location where we are, but it is kind of on the way to everything and fairly central, so it's convenient for the people, especially the people who live in that area.

Christine Jackman14:29

Most people come on foot, some people drive.

Christine Jackman14:33

Um I just wanted to let you know that we're we're still going strong, we're still seeing people come in, we're still uh loaning a lot of books out.

Christine Jackman14:43

We we do cater to the people specifically.

Christine Jackman14:46

If they ask us, I want to read this specific book, we go out and get it.

Christine Jackman14:51

We try to curate our collection to the community.

Christine Jackman14:56

So our nonfiction is very strongly local history.

Christine Jackman15:00

We don't keep a lot of other nonfiction, we are more entertainment reading.

Christine Jackman15:05

We do have a large children's section as well.

Christine Jackman15:08

Um, and I don't know, is there are there any questions?

Sid Tobias15:15

Thank you and uh thank you uh to Jim as well for the presentation.

Alison MacKenzie15:19

It was enlightened and uh bit of history certainly um uh set into context quite a bit so I'll I'll turn to my colleagues in council if there's any questions for uh the Reading Center no questions yeah Councillor McKenzie um thank you for the presentation you both kind of answered the questions I had so um but I was wondering, are you to speak to the the the demographic of the people who come into the reading room?

Christine Jackman15:52

We are very strongly seniors.

Christine Jackman15:56

Also, our volunteers are mostly seniors too.

Christine Jackman16:01

And we do get quite a few children.

Christine Jackman16:03

There are at least three daycare centers very close by.

Christine Jackman16:08

So we get a lot of people who come in with their children.

Christine Jackman16:10

We get daycare people walking by all the time.

Christine Jackman16:13

But I would say that our demographic is mostly seniors.

Christine Jackman16:17

Great.

Christine Jackman16:17

Thank you.

Sid Tobias16:19

Thank you, Councillor Lemon and then Councillor Rogers, please.

Gery Lemon16:22

Thank you.

Gery Lemon16:23

Thanks, Christine and Jim.

Gery Lemon16:25

Jim, you made you made a comment that, you know, urging us to help and and keep, you know, the community to to support the reading center until such time the GVP GVPL established sees fit to establish a branch here.

Gery Lemon16:44

Would that be the overall greater wish of the reading center board and membership, do you think?

J. Powell16:54

I I cannot speak for the board.

J. Powell16:58

I I cannot speak for the board.

J. Powell17:00

It certainly is my wish.

J. Powell17:03

Uh I love the View Royal Reading Center.

J. Powell17:07

I read over 50 books a year from there, plus additional ones from the Greater Victoria Public Library.

J. Powell17:16

But I'd be lost without the Reading Center.

J. Powell17:19

My wife is the same.

J. Powell17:21

She reads as much or more than I do, although she reads nonfiction where I read fiction.

J. Powell17:29

Okay.

J. Powell17:30

If there was a branch of the Greater Victoria Public Library, we would probably use it as well.

J. Powell17:38

And quite frankly, I'd use the reading center if it was still there.

J. Powell17:43

But I know there's finances involved.

J. Powell17:46

Uh and you, you know, it's difficult if you had a reading center in View Royal or a library in View Royal, would you really need a reading center?

J. Powell17:57

I think the volunteers would miss it, and I would miss it.

J. Powell18:01

But you have to be practical sometimes.

Gery Lemon18:04

Okay, thanks.

John Rogers18:08

Yeah.

John Rogers18:09

Thanks.

John Rogers18:10

Can you advise from sorry, and you may have re put it in your grant application, but uh what do you have in terms of membership fees and um what fundraising do you do?

Christine Jackman18:20

We don't charge fees for membership, we charge fines and we have book sales to raise funds.

Christine Jackman18:27

And this year we will be applying for a gaming grant.

Sid Tobias18:37

Any other questions from counselors?

Sid Tobias18:40

As uh I I have one of my own, and that is has there been any discussion formally with the Greater Victoria Public Library to look at um I I don't know what would be best, a cooperative model that would um potentially share resources between the reading center and the library.

Sid Tobias19:02

I'm thinking off the top of my head, an ability to pick up your books from there potentially to get other resources to be able to kind of you know cross um support each other and uh because it cost you nothing to get a Victoria, Greater Victoria Public Library um uh card.

Sid Tobias19:28

And then you know, a lot of the services that would be available, plus Greater Victoria Library could use some of the space if they were doing presentations or um looking at some of the benefits of their uh training that's online that's available.

Sid Tobias19:45

Has anything had been pursued uh to uh work out kind of a relationship?

Christine Jackman19:51

Uh yes, there has.

Christine Jackman19:52

Uh when my mother was manager, she had several meetings with the Greater Victoria Public Library.

Christine Jackman19:58

Uh the meetings took the tone of either us becoming a branch or becoming, as you said, cooperative with the library, and we were turned down, just flat turned down by the library.

Christine Jackman20:10

Um, we also we did engage in interlibrary loans with the Greater Victoria Public Library, and that was shut down.

Christine Jackman20:17

And I'm sorry, I don't know why.

Christine Jackman20:19

I think it was a cost issue.

Christine Jackman20:21

Um this was just slightly before I started working with them, so I don't know that part.

Sid Tobias20:29

Thank you as well.

Gery Lemon20:33

I mentioned that I've spoken with um Maureen Salwa, the the CEO of the Greater Victoria Public Library, and she's agreed to meet with me and Christine to discuss opportunities.

Sid Tobias20:49

Thank you, Jim.

J. Powell20:51

If I may, uh when we lost our our reading center grant from the library services branch, they also decreed that we would lose our interlibrary loan service and also the IT section that used to provide us with a a website so that we could advertise and and do loans online, things like that.

J. Powell21:13

So they really cut us off at that point.

J. Powell21:14

Thank you, Jim.

Sid Tobias21:19

And thank you both for answering the questions and a good presentation history lesson for us.

Sid Tobias21:24

Thank you.

Sid Tobias21:26

Council Lemon, I'd look to you for a discussion about the motion, I think.

Gery Lemon21:32

Okay, thank you.

Gery Lemon21:33

Well, I'm I'm going to uh oh I need to get my agenda up, um make move that council need my glasses now.

Gery Lemon21:45

Hold on.

Gery Lemon21:48

Um here here we go.

Gery Lemon21:51

Uh that we the council approve the requested $38,000 grant in aid for 2023 for the Vieuroyal Release Center.

Sid Tobias22:17

Okay, and uh is there a seconder for that.

John Rogers22:23

I will second for discussion.

Sid Tobias22:25

Okay, and uh let's go to the mover first for um some motivation, Councilor Lemmon.

Gery Lemon22:33

Okay, well, thank you.

Gery Lemon22:34

Um we have an it's the 80th anniversary of perhaps the longest standing, maybe the fire department might be in, might be in the the same league, but the longest standing organizations in View Oil.

Gery Lemon22:49

It's a it's a founding organization.

Gery Lemon22:52

And I I you know I think it would be it would be I won't say irresponsible, but shameful for us to uh to not support it at this to and celebrate this longevity of of a volunteer run um um initiative.

Gery Lemon23:17

And you know, it's the reading center is you know it's it's much more than books, it's much more than reading.

Gery Lemon23:23

It's it's we don't have a senior center here.

Gery Lemon23:25

We don't, you know, we have a we have a community hall, but it is limited in size of what it can accommodate and uh the the reading center is it's it's a social hub for many people in View Royal it's a you know you you pop into the reading center people know you they get to know you they get to know what you like in your books um and it's it's a it's a social um comfortable place to be and handy it's handy it's a handy place to get your books yeah thank you, Councillor Lemon.

Sid Tobias24:03

And I'll go to the seconder uh for um motivation or discussion.

Sid Tobias24:08

And then to you, Councillor Brown.

Sid Tobias24:10

Okay.

John Rogers24:12

Well, thank you, Mr.

John Rogers24:13

Powell, for the uh the history.

John Rogers24:14

And I'm probably one of the uh few that remembered back in the 60s when it was in the community hall and as a child going there on a regular basis.

John Rogers24:14

I remember I remember it well.

John Rogers24:25

So I I know it well.

John Rogers24:26

I also know that um uh before we got the casino, the uh Greater Victoria Library, uh we were cheap and proud of it.

John Rogers24:34

So it it required that we had to pay $400 per person for anybody that wanted to join the Greater Victoria Library.

John Rogers24:42

You know that.

John Rogers24:42

And we would get reimbursed by council, but back that was uh probably before uh we're around when we were only five, four thousand people.

John Rogers24:51

Um then the um of course uh the casino came in, and at that time we were able, we were forced, not forced, but now we're required to be a regional member of it.

John Rogers25:01

Um so the situation today is that we're faced with a 9.95% tax increase.

John Rogers25:10

We all are.

John Rogers25:11

Probably business is more.

John Rogers25:12

Residential stratus will be more than that.

John Rogers25:15

And um the the issue is that the um we've received the tax increase for uh Greater Victoria Um Library, and that was 40,000.

John Rogers25:25

So they've asked that's a almost a half percent tax increase that they want, they need.

John Rogers25:30

And uh and um it's um an issue where it's that's directly off taxpayers now.

John Rogers25:36

What used to be on the casino is no more.

John Rogers25:39

We pay the rec center, but we're finding that the the rec center is going up and up and up, and and counselor Kowalovich has just informed us that the infrastructure bills of the the or the uh restaurant rec, parks rec roofs and so forth, gonna be about five million.

John Rogers25:54

You know, it's a huge chunk, and we also have a police station to build.

John Rogers25:58

So with all that, with the casino, with those um uh issues, I have um I'm I'm sorry, but I have a real issue about duplication of service.

John Rogers26:08

And with all due respect and and I appreciate the volunteers and what you've done over the years and and what you want to set out to do, because of that, I cannot support the grants and aid application at this time.

John Rogers26:20

It's um just too much to uh to ask of the taxpayers, and um we're we're at a point, and I and I I hear you guys are struggling.

John Rogers26:29

And uh it's a it's a mutual situation.

John Rogers26:30

You know, I understand that.

John Rogers26:35

Um so um unfortunately, I I feel it's time to really deal with a uh serious situation.

John Rogers26:45

And uh, you know, the GVPL, the Wonder Fuke Rec Center, um there is easy access, it has all the features at all as all the amenities, it has the rec center and and it has a senior center.

John Rogers26:58

So regrettably, I cannot support the motion.

Sid Tobias27:05

Thank you, Councillor Rogers, Councilor Brown, please.

Don Brown27:08

Yeah, I appreciate the uh the reading center.

Don Brown27:11

Um my only concern is the the amount.

Don Brown27:14

Uh we only have $40,000 left in our grants and aid, and we have one more request for funds.

Don Brown27:21

And we typically keep $5,000 aside for something that comes up later in the year.

Don Brown27:26

So I would propose if I could get a second or an amendment to to uh uh approve a grant of thirty thousand dollars if someone would second that.

Sid Tobias27:38

I think that's uh a good one.

Sid Tobias27:40

I just want to make sure folks have had a discussion to chime in, those that want to.

Sid Tobias27:44

Counselor Brown, Councilor McKenzie.

Alison MacKenzie27:46

Yes, thank you.

Alison MacKenzie27:47

Um I uh do appreciate also the the value and the history that um you provided, but I do echo uh Councillor Rogers' comments, uh you know, with the increase in the G VPL fees, we really have to make sure we're getting the most value for our money in that service.

Alison MacKenzie28:08

And we also have to compare the request for funding to the other requests that we received.

Alison MacKenzie28:25

So this amount is just uh in my opinion, we're not um getting the most out of our our available limited uh funds.

Sid Tobias28:35

And I think um also when reviewing the budget comments, there were a lot of comments about the reading room as well uh again questioning the the value uh for the cost so I would prefer to see a conversation that that happen with the GPPL see if yeah if if we could see if it could be a branch or um some of these suggestions that Mayor Tobias said and but yes uh right now I don't I can't approve the the request for the amount of um before I go to you Council Lemon I just wanted to make my own statement and I I I grew up reading out of a bookmobile in rural Nova Scotia and certainly appreciated the availability.

Sid Tobias29:23

I don't think I would have got to read if it wasn't for the bookmobile, um, to be honest with you.

Sid Tobias29:28

Um, I see that it serves, you know, really over a thousand people in View Royal.

Sid Tobias29:33

And although we've doled out money for uh other things for grants and aid that are good for the community.

Sid Tobias29:39

I don't see that many active members, uh, particularly amongst seniors being a real thing to do.

Sid Tobias29:44

So I also um, you know, share, here's where I'm caught a bit.

Sid Tobias29:48

I I share the concerns that Councillor McKenzie and Councillor Rogers do, and and Counselor Brown with the budget.

Sid Tobias29:55

Um I support it for this year, and maybe I'm not I'm not the first mayor to say that, but we need to come up with a plan with uh the greater uh Victoria Public Library as well as you know diversifying uh our ass.

Sid Tobias30:11

There are people out there waiting to give money away.

Sid Tobias30:14

I know this because they try to offer it.

Sid Tobias30:16

Um and I think we you need some help in in um in a process of discovery and and maybe some assistance around how we can uh leverage other people's money because that's always better to spend, right?

Sid Tobias30:30

Uh instead of tax money.

Sid Tobias30:32

Uh so I'm a big supporter of other people's money when it comes to ventures like this, and I can't help but think that there are other opportunities to diversify the commitment to it.

Sid Tobias30:44

Um now there's a a number that's been thrown out for $30,000 to give us a starting spot.

Sid Tobias30:51

Um I'm just wondering, Councillor Lemon, will that how long will that suffice for rent and whatnot?

Gery Lemon31:02

Um thank you for asking.

Gery Lemon31:04

I not very long, I suspect.

Gery Lemon31:06

Christine, what is your rent?

Gery Lemon31:09

$2,000 a month or three?

Gery Lemon31:11

Two.

Gery Lemon31:12

Okay.

Gery Lemon31:13

So it'll cover our rent and maybe it would be a good starting.

Gery Lemon31:18

Would would that be a starting place and and you could consider some grant applications elsewhere to to expand?

Gery Lemon31:27

Okay.

Sid Tobias31:28

So your worship, um would you want to vote on my motion and then we can go to the I think Councilor Brown's got one on the table, so if if you were to second that, Councilor Brown, could you like read?

Don Brown31:39

The motion was to to approve a grant of thirty thousand dollars.

Don Brown31:43

And if I get a second or we can vote on that.

Gery Lemon31:44

I think we need to vote on the first one for 38 and then vote on his.

Gery Lemon31:50

I'll make an amendment to your oh you made an amendment to it.

Don Brown31:53

Okay.

Don Brown31:53

Voted an amendment first and then come back to your seconds.

Sid Tobias31:56

So the the motion is to fund the reading center.

Sid Tobias32:00

Of course, it's a period of one year.

Sid Tobias32:02

The grant would be reduced from 38 to $30,000 for this year.

Sid Tobias32:13

But if uh folks in council could offer some opportunities uh and support for uh crafting some other applications for grants, that would be I'm sure appreciated.

Sid Tobias32:25

Um so yeah, that is so moved by counselor brown and seconded by Councillor Lemon.

Sid Tobias32:32

Are we good to call the question or do we want to discuss for Councilor Rogers?

John Rogers32:41

I guess the um, you know, I you can see how far it goes.

John Rogers32:45

Um there was a thought that um GPPL might um uh partner with um the reading center, and over my time as being um on the um commission for um GPPL and others, um it's uh it was, you know, we can have a go at it, but I really, really doubt any success in that regard.

John Rogers33:09

Um the astonishing thing is that the provincial government finally gave um all the libraries um in the province uh some much needed cash since uh for you know almost what two or three decades they they neglected the formal libraries.

John Rogers33:24

I hardly think um they've changed their position on reading centers.

John Rogers33:28

Thank you.

Sid Tobias33:31

Thank you.

Sid Tobias33:31

Uh if there's no other questions uh or another comments, I'll call the question.

Sid Tobias33:36

Those in favor of the motion on the table for a grant of 30,000 uh to the View Royal Community Um or to the View Royal Reading Center.

Sid Tobias33:46

Uh all in favor.

Sid Tobias33:49

All opposed.

Sid Tobias33:50

And I see councilor uh McKenzie and Rogers are opposed for the record, so the motion carries um any other concern stuff oh i thought i turned it on that moves us to the public participation period is there anybody in the chamber that wishes to address council there's a lot of you here somebody's gonna want to say something.

Sid Tobias34:33

Nothing.

Sid Tobias34:34

Okay.

Sid Tobias34:34

Uh Carl, on the phone, do we have anybody?

Don Brown34:37

Mayor Tobias, we have no callers at this time.

Sid Tobias34:40

Everybody's doing something else when it's council meeting.

Sid Tobias34:44

Gotta get the memo out.

Sid Tobias34:46

Uh I think that allows me to pass the chair over to Councillor Brown for Protective Services.

Don Brown34:54

Yeah, welcome everyone to the um portion of this meeting, which is the Protective Services.

Don Brown35:01

Um, I just want to say in my report that we were without a bio officer for a period of time, and now we have uh Bile Officer Cameron on staff, and I'm sure he's gonna be a great addition.

Don Brown35:10

And we've put him to work for sure with several outstanding files.

Don Brown35:15

Um also just a reminder that it's tsunami awareness week this week.

Don Brown35:20

So uh people that have don't have kits, grab and go kits.

Don Brown35:24

I would recommend they they get them for every family member.

Don Brown35:27

And if you have one that's been sitting around for a few years, like mine, you have to go through it and check for your expiry dates on your on your food items.

Don Brown35:35

Um moving right on.

Don Brown35:38

I see uh uh Superintendent Preston's here, so I'll call you up, Superintendent, to give your police report.

T. Preston35:47

Thank you, Counselor.

T. Preston35:48

Mr.

T. Preston35:48

Mayor, Council, thanks for having me.

T. Preston35:50

Um so a number of things that I think um I discussed with uh staffers about first discussing uh strategic priorities for the year.

T. Preston35:58

And I think if I was if I'm correct, they wanted to do it at uh the committee of the whole.

T. Preston36:03

Is that correct, counselor?

Speaker_Unknown36:04

Yeah.

T. Preston36:05

Um, so every year we obviously sit down with each community.

T. Preston36:07

The uh the West Shore detachment is made up of seven communities, as you're well aware, including the uh Songhees and Esquamble First Nations.

T. Preston36:13

Um, and we try to establish the priorities that the community set for us.

T. Preston36:14

And we try to establish priorities.

T. Preston36:15

Uh and our fiscal year starts in April.

T. Preston36:17

So it's April to April.

T. Preston36:22

So this is my opportunity to hear from you to tell me what uh you're hearing from your constituents and you as a counsel um would like to see more or less of um in terms of uh law enforcement police services within your community.

T. Preston36:35

Uh typically uh things as uh visibility, uh community policing, traffic, drug enforcement, uh, those are types of things that I hear back from um communities, and I have so far with a number of the other communities.

T. Preston36:47

I have uh I think another five to go here, though.

T. Preston36:50

So um yeah, I'll pause here and perhaps I could put it to uh Councillor Brown uh or Mr.

T. Preston36:56

Mayor to uh to kind of set the conversation in motion as to what your priorities would uh what you'd like to see.

Don Brown37:02

Any counselors want to ask or supply some information to Superintendent Preston or Tobias?

Sid Tobias37:09

Yeah, thank you, Councilor Brown.

Sid Tobias37:10

Um Superintendent Preston, you've done, I think, an outstanding job on that West Bern side stretch, particularly during the day.

Sid Tobias37:17

Uh I note that um uh things have slowed down, including me going by uh cruiser a couple of times uh when I wasn't looking at my speedometer.

Sid Tobias37:27

Um and so thank you for being responsive there.

Sid Tobias37:31

I think we're we're finding niches in View Royal.

Sid Tobias37:34

Um now the I'll call it the road less traveled, uh, meaning that uh some of the issues aren't so much during the day, but they're at night and usually involve alcoholic consumption.

Sid Tobias37:47

And I know um that road is usually favored over the main highway all the way to the highlands if you're going that far, if you've had a couple of beers from downtown and that's where your next stop or home is.

Sid Tobias38:01

So I I think I would support um consideration of probably some uh some roadside checks.

Sid Tobias38:09

Um and that's something that uh perhaps the Highlands would uh would agree to as well.

Sid Tobias38:15

I know I meet with the mayor later on next week, and I can discuss with him just to see if there's some consensus there.

Sid Tobias38:22

Um, but uh we've had some close calls uh there with damage to public property, and certainly given the trajectory of some of those vehicles flying off around Eton or area concern.

Sid Tobias38:35

If anybody had been around there, they would have uh not been in good shape.

Sid Tobias38:39

And I'm sure some of the drivers even weren't uh ending up where they did.

Sid Tobias38:44

So uh I I think right now I'm I'm very satisfied with the responsiveness and the visibility for the RCMP.

Sid Tobias38:51

Certainly uh aware of it much more now, and and for me it's just some some some more consideration for that.

Sid Tobias38:59

The other part would be visibility on on the trails when you get the uh the bike teams up and running.

Sid Tobias39:06

Um I know that there uh is you know ongoing concern, particularly on the group, the goose and in our parks um with uh with with just having an extra visibility we realize that you cannot your presence isn't going to stop uh everything from going on but it's a reminder I think for folks that that uh view royal is covered by the RCMP and and uh and that they're on it so those those are the two points that there'll there'll probably be others right after this council meeting that come up but those are the two points that I see.

John Rogers39:41

Councillor Rogers yeah hi there um so I I guess a number of things.

John Rogers39:47

One is the um the whole issue of drug enforcement and uh particularly when we have those places operating in in our houses and on our streets, and we know of a couple with long-standing uh issues.

John Rogers39:59

Um and I I think the the um uh if there's some way of being able to improve the coordination communication, uh who knows, maybe part of neighborhood watch is that every house has a doorbell camera on it.

John Rogers40:11

And uh so that you know about that, you can then check what are the circumstances, and that you yeah, you had the ability to get the information rather than go on the news and say, anyone seen anything?

John Rogers40:22

So it um it I think the the technology and availability is there, and it may be an additional pair of eyes of functionality that would improve uh law enforcement um yeah for for you folks.

John Rogers40:35

Um the um the uh I'm also curious about the catch and release program uh offered by the Crown.

John Rogers40:40

Um is that still an ongoing issue or th has the Crown substantially changed their realization that they need to keep the dangerous people off the street.

T. Preston40:50

I think uh that's been voiced loud and clear by the Premier and uh by the Department of Justice.

T. Preston40:57

I think we're yet to see um w how that how that looks and how that transitions into you know real time with a with uh these serious offenders that you're speaking of because uh there's nothing more frustrating than um working feverishly on uh on individuals that are committing the majority of crime or violent crime in the community just to see them return back to the community without treatment or deterrent.

T. Preston41:20

So um I think we're too early in uh to to determine how this is going to unfold and and uh how this is going to look, but uh I can assure you from a law enforcement we welcome the the notion of you know that those select few that are causing the most uh the most issuing in our society and our communities.

John Rogers41:37

Indeed.

John Rogers41:38

One of the um uh uh you know ongoing issues that we're we're all facing is the um uh the the issue of constables having to stay long hours at the VGH to um uh provide watch and security and um and safety uh for both the the individuals who bring in and the the people around.

John Rogers41:57

Um has the province again refresh my memory, has the province offered any um improvements to that by hiring security?

T. Preston42:04

No, I mean they have security there, but unfortunately it's it's a statutory thing where it has to be a peace officer before um before a uh a doctor, not transition to a security person who the security person would would uh in then in turn tr uh transition to a doctor and and so until that's um changed or if it's ever changed uh I don't see our problem dramatically decreasing unless you know and I've been trying to champion and and try to be as loud as possible in terms of um having separate facilities uh so we don't have to take these individuals to an eMERGE where we wait you know uh two three four hours uh and not really for for our sake but I mean you know picture somebody in crisis that you're taking them in handcuffs and putting them there uh basically on show uh while you wait two three hours.

T. Preston42:55

Um like I I don't think we should be treating people like that first of all um and I don't think it's an efficiency by any means to have three four or five police departments sitting down there with uh you know people that are in crisis waiting to get treatment and there's not enough services so we wait there long periods of time costing you the taxpayers in each municipality um substantial amount of uh funds so I mean there's a lot of work to be done I think again I can only voice this to our councils and hope that our our councils uh mayor and councils champion uh this with the province and try to come up with some solution.

T. Preston43:33

I don't I don't have the solution.

T. Preston43:34

I think there's a number of solutions that could be posed and could be tried um but it really has to come from I think our mayor and council.

John Rogers43:42

If I if I may and I I I'm just suggesting that the um in in terms of a plan um maybe jointly led by the RCP and uh the mayors um with the the politicians to get some change going on um and improve that situation.

John Rogers44:02

So it's kind of a uh I'm not leaving it all to to uh the RC and P but it's a it is a coordination and and maybe it's time for um Vihan and and um RCP and and the province you know, key people getting down and addressing it.

T. Preston44:18

Yeah, it you know, I think it would be nice to dig deep across the province and try to come up with a a dollar figure.

T. Preston44:24

And you know, I think that's typically unfortunately what motivates uh, you know, um political movement is when you see an actual dollar figure.

T. Preston44:32

Um and I and I, you know, working in far reaching places throughout Western Canada here, this is not a significant issue.

T. Preston44:39

Um or I haven't seen as a significant in a lot of the rurals rural or smaller spots.

T. Preston44:44

You typically go to the hospital and they see you quite quickly in those spots.

T. Preston44:48

It's uh I've never seen it as bad as you know here in the lower mainland, especially uh I mean I I hear of people in the lower mainland.

T. Preston44:54

I haven't worked in the lower mainland, but I know they have similar issues as well.

T. Preston44:57

Um you know on our average is two hours.

T. Preston45:00

So every time we apprehend somebody, which is every day essentially, um, you know, we're waiting two hours at a hospital on average.

T. Preston45:08

Uh so you add that up with every police force and and every community that that that's a lot of salary dollars, uh, especially when our police officers costing around $200,000 uh per individual right now.

T. Preston45:14

Yeah.

John Rogers45:21

Just a um rhetorical question.

John Rogers45:23

I wonder what happens.

John Rogers45:24

Where do officers take such individuals when the emergency room is closed in small communities?

T. Preston45:30

Yeah, I mean, obviously we have to take them somewhere.

T. Preston45:32

So we uh we take them to the nearest facility.

T. Preston45:34

Interesting problem.

T. Preston45:35

Yeah, thank you.

T. Preston45:36

So you bet.

Don Brown45:38

Any other comments or yeah, counselor lineman?

Gery Lemon45:44

Yeah, sorry.

Don Brown45:46

I'm sorry.

Don Brown45:47

I didn't look over there, sorry.

Gery Lemon45:49

Yeah, no, I sort of no wonder I was anyway.

Gery Lemon45:52

Um I wanted I I wanted to address the very, very same same issue that my colleague addressed regarding um the time spent languishing in emergency rooms.

Gery Lemon46:05

So as he was speaking, I've you know, I was thinking, what what what can we do?

Gery Lemon46:09

Because I know the previous council, um I in fact I think the previous council and a few others um wrote the province, and that was when E B had, you know, was um premier EV was not premier and housing wasn't his priority.

Gery Lemon46:25

He was running there and nothing happened then.

Gery Lemon46:28

Um so perhaps it's it's it's a matter for um us to, you know, per perhaps for Mayor Tobias, um, when he goes to UBCM to meet with the uh the the minister responsible and uh maybe you know as a council we discussed you know uh a resolution and and uh you know kind of a a joint force of lower island um um local local politicians um making some noise and um seeing what we can do to get um some action but but todd um you you spoke about numbers now i don't know how we would get those kinds of numbers without you know, one of us working the phone for every detachment, but do you have any way of accessing through the RCMP?

Gery Lemon47:23

Like the R even if we were just to do the RCMP alone, um, spend you know, you know, this many thousand hours um uh um cooling their heels in ERs.

T. Preston47:35

I can check with our uh our uh headquarters in Green Timbers are off strategy and and some of the other uh departments, um including some of our strategists and our um yeah, there's a number of individuals that I think off the top of my head I can think of that we'd probably be able to put together something.

Levi Megenbir47:52

Yeah.

T. Preston47:52

Um just yeah, rough rough numbers based on uh kind of a global accounting.

Gery Lemon47:57

Okay.

Gery Lemon47:57

And I can certainly do that.

Gery Lemon47:59

Well perhaps we can we can think about what we can do in coordination with with others across the region and uh go from there.

T. Preston48:06

So in terms of uh priorities, uh sorry, counselor, um maybe I can turn it back to you.

T. Preston48:11

Okay.

T. Preston48:12

I just want to kind of revisit the the priorities for the year.

Don Brown48:15

Um if there's some other I I got a bit of a bias because I spent a lot of my policing career in community policing and school liaison.

Don Brown48:22

And having the officers in the school, even if it's a part-time, I think it has a lot of value and and not even specifically having uh the same officers doing it all the time.

Don Brown48:32

Uh if you if that work spread out for so the the students just don't think oh Constable so and so is the good guy everyone else aren't.

Don Brown48:40

But the trust and the uh the value uh I I was in uh Nanaimo detachment for nine years and six years of that was in community policing.

Don Brown48:49

And even today if I go to Danaimo, students that I taught how to ride bikes safely or cross the street safely still remember me.

Don Brown48:56

And that really feels good.

Don Brown48:58

And I think it it's a two-way street.

Don Brown49:00

And also the uh I know the staff and the students always appreciated it when uh the constables went to the school zones and even if they're just sitting on the side of the road uh doing paperwork uh that sends a message out it gives you the visibility and uh teachers used to float our detachment up and say you know how happy they were to see the police car there uh if you know eight o'clock in the morning or eight to eight forty whenever they start school.

Don Brown49:25

Um so that that kind of visibility the and and it's a long term you know those kids grew up and a lot of them become police officers.

Don Brown49:32

I uh police officers in Victoria uh say we we remember you because you coached us as you when you were a police officer or you went to my school and I think um it it's it's it is it works both ways.

T. Preston49:44

Okay.

T. Preston49:44

Yeah uh I couldn't agree more and and to to that end obviously I think there's 20 oh god don't quote me 27 schools or whatever is in in the in the area here and so what we do is we've actually assigned schools to individual members not just our community policing but just to that very point where you know especially if they have a kid in that school it gives them an excuse to go to the schools your your child and just be around those children for 15 minutes in the morning around school or uh school hour um school zone times and park those those police cars there a slows down people and B exactly what you uh you're saying you need to build those those relationships.

T. Preston50:17

So I know a school a skill school district sixty-two is extremely supportive of um having police in schools.

T. Preston50:23

School district sixty one, I know there has been some issues, uh and we do have a couple schools that fall into that uh that area here.

T. Preston50:28

I know Del Manic's been uh Chief Manic's been quite vocal about that and I certainly support Chief Manic on uh every step of the way when it comes to uh having our our membership in the schools there.

T. Preston50:38

So uh yeah if I'm hearing you correctly here schools uh obviously community policing schools and visibility within those are are certainly priorities and and I share those uh priorities as well as some of the traffic um you know uh those are always concerns but it's nice to actually have specific areas and and I lead that and those those are uh moving targets through throughout the year.

T. Preston50:57

So again I can't emphasize enough when you and your constituents when you hear of areas that are problematic, when you see those areas, please uh just send it directly to me.

T. Preston51:04

Um, I'm not gonna be the one out there uh enforcing it, uh likely, but I will at least I'm aware of it, and then I send it down to traffic services as well as every morning.

T. Preston51:11

We have watch briefings every evening we have watch briefings, and so we can address issues like Western Burnside Road and and these other ones.

T. Preston51:18

Um is there any oh sorry, counselor, go ahead.

T. Preston51:24

Yeah, go ahead, council counselor McKenzie.

Alison MacKenzie51:26

Go ahead.

Alison MacKenzie51:27

Thank you.

Alison MacKenzie51:28

Um, I would say I I would like to see more visibility in in the general community, not just at the schools, um, particularly I think in the commercial.

Alison MacKenzie51:39

So we have two main commercial areas in Vie Royal, actually, probably three.

Alison MacKenzie51:43

Um, but I'm thinking, you know, Admiral's Walk, Eagle Creek, and those, to be honest, are are where I've seen some maybe not as great behaviors happening.

Alison MacKenzie51:54

Um, and they are they do happen to be on the outskirts of the town, like on the borders.

Alison MacKenzie51:59

So it it would just, yeah, in those areas, I would um I think it would be good to see um have a little bit more police presence or visit just visibility, I guess.

T. Preston52:09

Yeah, those uh great points and and we hear that from the commercial.

T. Preston52:12

We hear that from the liquor like the liquor store up at uh Eagle Crest there.

T. Preston52:15

Eagle Crest, right?

T. Preston52:16

Eagle, yeah.

T. Preston52:17

Eagle View.

T. Preston52:18

Um yeah they you know they had significant uh thefts from there and shoplifting and so that is one of the priorities like park your car like you know you need to do paperwork.

T. Preston52:29

You know it's very clear we don't want to be doing paperwork back at the detachment if you can help it.

T. Preston52:33

You park your car there, you park yourself in front of a school zone, you park yourself in front of Walmart superstore, um you know outside the fire hall and view road like in high visible areas and especially in the commercial areas where there's a lot of thefts um so I hear you so I will make sure that that again that is put in as uh a priority for in terms of the visibility this year.

Sid Tobias52:54

Sorry Mary Tobias go ahead sorry just uh yeah just just one I I think to summarize and it doesn't have to be in our priority order I think it's um um around those commercial areas to create uh some more visibility I think around the school zones to and unfortunately it's mainly mums that are rushing to school to drop their own kids off that are um challenging to both uh crossing guards and to other people's children.

Sid Tobias53:23

Um but uh the uh the other piece that I'm interested in like looking at your trends where you see a preventative action might be a emerging concern.

Sid Tobias53:39

Um like I went into uh quality foods the other day and I was looking for a roast and they said we don't keep them in the meat department anymore because they're stolen too quickly.

Sid Tobias53:51

So if you want to roast you got to go to the butcher and he'll cut you a roast for it.

Sid Tobias53:57

And that's seems to be something that's occurred like within the past year and a half.

Sid Tobias54:03

Um, so I'm just wondering your take on trends that you see happening that maybe you would like uh to inform us that that would help our priorities a bit.

T. Preston54:15

Well, I don't know if you got the uh the annual report there if you've had time to digest it.

T. Preston54:19

But I uh shoplifting was up a hundred percent.

T. Preston54:21

I can't remember if that was across the whole board or if I was just in Langford, but I'm pretty sure it was across the whole board, it was up a hundred percent.

T. Preston54:27

So um you have desperate uh desperate times right now.

T. Preston54:30

You have a lot of people that are um unhoused and mental health and and all the challenges that uh society is facing right now.

T. Preston54:37

And clearly um, you know, there has been a movement with some of these individuals that are unhoused and uh not receiving the services that they necessarily need, and and we've seen more and more moving out to the west shore.

T. Preston54:49

Uh nobody's immune, everybody's seeing it.

T. Preston54:52

Um, yeah, so that's that's one trend, and and so to that end, obviously, working with our um our partners at you know the grocery stores and the LPOs, and um again, strategic, you know, um placing our vehicles strategically and visible, you know, being visible, being visible, being visible.

T. Preston55:08

But you know, you can't uh that that in itself, unfortunately, is not going to solve uh that, but I'm hearing what you're saying.

T. Preston55:15

Uh, one of the other emerging trends, it's not here in in um in View Royal near as much.

T. Preston55:21

Um, Callwood actually has seen more of it, and it's it's unique.

T. Preston55:24

It's funny how you know we have this uh integrated detachment in certain areas.

T. Preston55:28

It's like, well, you know, you have you know substantial issues up at the hospital, mental health, and casino, and a few other places here.

T. Preston55:34

Um, right now in Callwood, we've got some youth issues.

T. Preston55:37

Um, and so youth is uh is a substantial concern of mine, and probably probably the biggest concern I have right now is some of the youth violence.

T. Preston55:46

And uh I don't know if you've seen some of the media that we put out, but it's it's alarming and you know, unfortunately, unchecked.

T. Preston55:53

And if we don't curb that behavior as youth, um, they don't go anywhere, they just grow into adults um conducting themselves in a perhaps uh even a more destructive manner.

T. Preston56:02

And so that's one of the ones that uh you know, we're really trying to come up with some strategies, how we can work together with the municipalities.

T. Preston56:09

This isn't a a police only fix.

T. Preston56:11

This is obviously uh working with you know parents and coming up with you know ideas.

T. Preston56:16

View Royal had probably one of the best uh best things I've seen.

T. Preston56:19

Um I unfortunately I think it's closed now, but it was the coffee shop um down by the doctor's office there and by the IGA or whatever that is.

T. Preston56:27

Um, and that was a great initiative that you guys had running.

T. Preston56:29

In fact, I've been championing and prouding that to all the other communities say we need to do we need to follow View Royal steps and perhaps collectively all coming up with some more of those types of facilities where we've got some of the youth that are yeah they could go this way or they could go this way they're on the kind of fork on the road.

T. Preston56:45

Um and perhaps going home isn't their their best option because uh the role model that that perhaps they have or don't have and so you know those are the the types of things that when you talk about trying to get in front of the trends that's what we're that's what we need to do.

T. Preston57:00

And so um I won't be shy in bringing those forward um throughout the year here and letting you know and hopefully we can strike some committees and work together.

T. Preston57:07

And that's the the benefit of having seven communities in one is we can pool the resources together and so you don't put it on the backs of one community.

T. Preston57:14

Um if you don't mind, I'm gonna switch uh gears.

T. Preston57:18

Is that all right, uh counselor?

T. Preston57:20

I'm just gonna uh give you some some overall statistics here and then perhaps some of the calls for service.

T. Preston57:26

Um so we throughout uh this is for uh the last quarter here, or sorry, February.

T. Preston57:32

Uh we had 19 interactions uh traffic in View Royal.

T. Preston57:35

Eight uh we gave it eight tickets uh last month, and we also the rest of them the uh the eleven others were uh warnings and box threes, which is you have to get your vehicle fixed, you have to bring it back to the detachment and show us uh or to uh um a facility to get your your vehicle fixed.

T. Preston57:51

Um proactive school zone patrols in View Royal Elementary is Eagle View Royal Um and three ALPR.

T. Preston57:58

So we actually have uh a new uh on all our cars we're starting to move towards having automatic license plate readers which I know a lot of people thought we already had but we didn't it was all manual before and so now we put these devices on there and they just basically read license plates uh 360 around your vehicle or you can set it in different manners and then you'll be able to tell who's prohibited of course now that they don't have ball tags on anymore who's unregistered who's prohibited who's uh restricted who's uninsured and so it's amazing how many uh how many hits you get with this uh this new technology.

T. Preston58:31

Um, some of the calls for service we've had in the last month um in uh in uh we had a fraudster call, uh or sorry, a fraudster that was caught by our crime reduction unit.

T. Preston58:41

Uh they were using stolen credit cards from vehicles that were broken into, and uh suspect was tracked down by a crime reduction, executed a search warrant uh on the suspect's property, located all the credit cards, and that suspect uh was uh was serving a conditional sentence order at the time, so kind of to your point on the revolving door uh for similar convictions of fraud and theft and went back to jail based on the new charges.

T. Preston59:04

Uh we had a mail on a CSO, another conditional sentence order.

T. Preston59:08

Uh he was on house arrest at New Roads Recovery Center, and he just walked away from the uh facility, was reported to police, and uh he wasn't located despite the extensive patrol, so we forwarded a charge to uh crown for that individual.

T. Preston59:21

Uh we had a curfew uh check on a female uh by a 24-hour curfew release order, and she was not home, so we forwarded a charge for her as well.

T. Preston59:29

Police called for a woman yelling, screaming, protective services removed the female.

T. Preston59:30

We had a disturbance at the VGH.

T. Preston59:36

However, she had a head injury that needed tending, uh, so the police brought her back with the ambulance this time, and uh she was then cooperative when we were present uh at the hospital with her.

T. Preston59:47

Uh we had a search for a missing female at Theodus Lake.

T. Preston59:49

She was missing for three hours, friends split up on the trail uh to search for the woman's phone.

T. Preston59:54

Um, and not being able to locate her friend, officers began foot patrols in the area.

T. Preston59:58

View where a fire attendant and uh with their boat to assist.

T. Preston1:00:02

And at 6 30, the individual was uh was located during the search.

T. Preston1:00:06

Two youths, 14 and 15, uh ran into police and advised that they were being stalked by a cougar.

T. Preston1:00:12

And uh the conservation officer actually confirmed at that time that there was a cougar sighting in the area, and so um it was kind of a good thing that uh we were able to resolve that issue without injury or um danger to any of the youth.

T. Preston1:00:27

We had a uh uh a very, very unfortunate uh sudden death of a uh four-month uh infant uh in the last month.

T. Preston1:00:36

We had a mental health uh complaint to the business in the View Royal reporting that their co-worker was uh suicidal and uh depressed, and uh we were able to um provide proper services without uh taking that individual into care.

T. Preston1:00:51

Um again, we really have to make these uh and it and it's really difficult because you got to make these judgment calls um based on somebody's mental health.

T. Preston1:00:58

We're not doctors, um, but you you just you can't have the the volume is astonishing of the amount of mental health associated to calls right now.

T. Preston1:01:08

Um I know when I started and I'm sure when Council Brown started, uh it was a fraction.

T. Preston1:01:13

Um and now it's it's it's incredible.

T. Preston1:01:16

And I like I said, I encourage you to come on ride-alongs.

T. Preston1:01:18

Uh that's open all year long if you want to see what I'm talking about.

T. Preston1:01:21

Uh we really as a society, we really gotta something has to change here.

T. Preston1:01:25

Um it it's not working, whatever whatever we're doing.

T. Preston1:01:30

Um we had a uh a paranoid emotionally disturbed person male entering to a complainant's stranger's yard, began stating he was being followed.

T. Preston1:01:38

Family of the uh emotionally disturbed uh person advised uh advised about this and then and what was happening, and the male was not fit again for apprehension.

T. Preston1:01:44

Uh we did a check well-being.

T. Preston1:01:47

We were able to get the supports for that individual.

T. Preston1:01:52

Um called to advise a family member, took uh seven sleeping pills, and uh we attended on that one as well.

T. Preston1:01:59

Um that one was taken to the hospital.

T. Preston1:02:02

Uh, March 17th, we had three separate uh drive row drive well prohibited files uh in in um View Royal.

T. Preston1:02:10

One of the uh three vehicles also had no insurance.

T. Preston1:02:13

Um we had a male wielding a knife at the four meal uh four mile liquor store.

T. Preston1:02:17

He was a homeless man who uh was under the influence of drugs.

T. Preston1:02:20

We had theft from three vehicles, credit cards, a personal items stolen, SUI fraud investigation for one file where the credit card was used.

T. Preston1:02:27

I can't help but think that the other guy on the first page might be uh related to that.

T. Preston1:02:29

But um we had in a on Craig Flower an empty and empty trailer.

T. Preston1:02:37

Police called for possible squatters living inside the empty trailer.

T. Preston1:02:41

Um police were called and arrested two suspects for breaking into that same trailer.

T. Preston1:02:45

Um we had a report of a male urinating in a public parking lot at uh Admiral's Road.

T. Preston1:02:51

Spoke with the owner of the RV, uh parked at those locations, advised his nephew was the culprit and agreed to pack up and leave the area.

T. Preston1:02:58

We had a report of a male walking into traffic causing vehicles to slam on the brakes near Elements Casino.

T. Preston1:03:02

Officers determined that the male uh was a U.S.

T. Preston1:03:05

national who failed to report entry into Canada, had no valid reason to be here.

T. Preston1:03:08

He was arrested under the Immigration and refugee Protection act and transferred into CBSA uh custody.

T. Preston1:03:14

We had a mischief at uh on Talcott Road.

T. Preston1:03:14

Residents uh had had uh caught fire.

T. Preston1:03:20

The small fire um there was evidence of uh arson and the investigation is still ongoing.

T. Preston1:03:26

Kerfee check for prolific offender on island highway led to the officer seizing a stolen e-scooter parked outside the home.

T. Preston1:03:33

Unable to connect that scooter item to the offender, but the scooter was recovered.

T. Preston1:03:36

Uh female cyclist was struck by a vehicle on uh 275 Island Highway in View Royal.

T. Preston1:03:41

The cyclist had abrasions on her arm, complaining of hip pain.

T. Preston1:03:44

Driver was conducting a right turn and claiming they shoulder check but did not see the cyclist.

T. Preston1:03:49

And on April 4th, uh this was uh last one here, April 4th.

T. Preston1:03:52

Um, most of these are from February.

T. Preston1:03:54

This one was an intentional fire that was set at VGH um by someone who um had some mental health challenges and no charges were resulting uh uh complex file, but uh no no charges will be ordered on that.

T. Preston1:04:09

So those are just a random sampling of uh some of the files.

T. Preston1:04:12

I try to give you a wide overview.

T. Preston1:04:13

I try to get the analyst to not just get all the violent ones, but just kind of a wide range of uh files so you can hear what's going on in your community.

T. Preston1:04:20

Um the first quarter.

T. Preston1:04:22

So this is uh stats from the analyst here.

T. Preston1:04:25

Uh you had a four percent increase of files, so that's 27 files from January to March compared to the last year.

T. Preston1:04:30

So not a huge significant increase, it's 27 files.

T. Preston1:04:34

Um nice to report that you had a 20 cent uh 26% decrease in violent crime uh from the last quarter, which was great.

T. Preston1:04:43

Uh property crime, you had a 9% increase.

T. Preston1:04:46

Again, those are you know, those those statistics can be skewed.

T. Preston1:04:48

You you heard about the one prolific offender, two prolific offenders.

T. Preston1:04:52

Um, they can do a lot of damage in terms of property crime in a very short order and skew stats quite quickly.

T. Preston1:04:57

So hospital, you had a 20% increase at the hospital uh compared to uh last year at this time.

T. Preston1:05:05

So we had 55 incidents in the first quarter of this year from January to March at the hospital.

T. Preston1:05:14

You had a 117% increase uh at Elements Casino.

T. Preston1:05:19

So that one's perhaps one to keep an eye on.

T. Preston1:05:22

Um we'll see if that trend continues or what have you, but uh that's 21 files, uh, and an additional 21 files compared to last year.

T. Preston1:05:31

So 39 files, and which is 21 more than last year at this time.

T. Preston1:05:42

So one of the things I wanted to touch base, because we are getting complaints, is um about drug use, open drug use.

T. Preston1:05:49

And so I'm not sure if uh all the council is uh is aware, but uh um in British Columbia is now it is uh legal to uh possess um certain most hard elicit drugs and use openly in public.

T. Preston1:06:05

So although you can't uh you can't have open liquor still, but you can shoot uh heroin and uh cocaine and and all that, and the federal government is using this as a three-year pilot project.

T. Preston1:06:16

Uh you're able to possess 2.5 grams of illicit hard drugs and use them in public spaces.

T. Preston1:06:22

Um the notion, the spirit behind why the federal government did that is to decrease the stigmatation um behind um drug drug abuse and drug users so that they will seek help and they won't feel ashamed that uh they have an addiction or um an issue, and that they'll be more um uh readily willing to uh to seek help.

T. Preston1:06:46

And so British Columbia is the only province that's uh that's trying this, and it's it's only been a couple months, and so it's too early to comment on which way this is going in terms of curbing or helping or or uh hindering.

T. Preston1:06:58

So more to follow on that.

T. Preston1:07:00

But just so you know, we are receiving complaints from uh you know constituents saying that they're seeing people using drugs and uh you know, unfortunately they're finding needles and what have you in areas, although it's not it's not legal to throw your needle.

T. Preston1:07:13

Uh I think it's probably expected that that's going to happen uh given these current circumstances.

T. Preston1:07:18

Um anyway, something to keep an eye on, and and certainly some feedback from you so that uh you know we can tell uh the province and and the federal government if this is working in your view or not working in in uh in your view.

T. Preston1:07:32

So um, and then as far as uh I think in the annual report, I'll just quickly comment on the fact that uh you paid for 13% of the resources last year, and ironically, you used 13% of the resources last year.

T. Preston1:07:47

So you you paid for 13% of the officers, and we responded to 13% of calls for service in your area.

T. Preston1:07:53

That's going to fluctuate every year.

T. Preston1:07:54

Uh that's some years you win, some years you lose, and that's just the part of uh being in a partnership with others.

T. Preston1:08:01

Um scale, I think you you certainly win at the end of the year with uh being having a partnership as uh this.

T. Preston1:08:07

One thing I would um, and I know that you guys are certainly ripe for, and I think the whole CRD is um for expansion and and for um um new buildings and new construction and uh you know a population increase, and with that, all the only thing I would ask is that you know you keep policing in the back of your mind that typically you're policing at a one to one to eight seventy five uh ratio and so if you approve a building for 875 just have that in the back of your head that that's a police officer um you know and that it has been that was accepted in the past it hasn't been ratified by this council and hopefully you know we can have some more conversations about that at a different date but I know Callwood has now ratified that as well just so that they don't we don't have to come back every year and say hey um you know this community is giving a police officer or you giving a police officer everybody's kind of a common across the board um Lankard's a higher uh they're one to seven fifty or that's what they were aiming towards we'll see if this council still stays with that but it does uh it certainly avoids friction between um your partners knowing that this is everybody's responsibility and if everybody pays their fair share if you will and you know what that fair share is in advance it's certainly easy to plan for for development as well and the same for municipal employees it's a three to one ratio is what we've been using for that um and I think I might have told this council before it's not a great uh formula to use in terms of there's better formulas if you were a standalone detachment but having partners in this there's only one real fair metric that unless somebody else can come up with a metric that everybody can agree on but we haven't found that yet and it'll also certainly be advantageous when we go into a new building.

T. Preston1:09:45

Um, everybody knows what their fair share would look like, uh having some sort of metric that you can measure.

T. Preston1:09:51

And so with that, I've talked a lot.

T. Preston1:09:53

I will pause.

Kim Anema1:09:56

Any questions or comments?

Speaker_Unknown1:09:58

No.

Don Brown1:09:59

The uh val tags is interesting because when they took them away, of course, that you guys have scanners, which is great.

Don Brown1:10:04

That's good to know because you know you used to see the expiry date, but I know people are driving out of province and then other countries have issues because they're getting pulled over in Washington State, for example, because the the patrol officer says expiry, you know, February twenty two twenty twenty three.

Don Brown1:10:21

So I think ICBC recommending people just peel off all the old ones.

Don Brown1:10:24

I know I've done that in my own vehicle.

Don Brown1:10:26

Yeah, I didn't think of that, but that's a good point.

Don Brown1:10:27

Yeah, just can I get a motion on the floor for to uh accept Superintendent Preston's report, please?

Don Brown1:10:33

So moved.

Don Brown1:10:33

Moved by uh Councilor Lemmon and seconded by Councillor Rogers.

Don Brown1:10:37

All those in favor.

Don Brown1:10:39

Thank you.

T. Preston1:10:41

Thanks for your time.

Don Brown1:10:44

And the next item is the building department report.

Don Brown1:10:50

Is there gonna be a verbal?

Don Brown1:10:51

Is that just no?

Don Brown1:10:51

Okay, thanks, Leanne.

Don Brown1:10:53

Uh can I get a motion to accept the building department report, please?

Don Brown1:10:56

Moved by Councilor Rogers, second by Councillor McKenzie.

Don Brown1:11:00

All those in favor?

Sid Tobias1:11:01

Carried.

Sid Tobias1:11:06

No new business.

Speaker_041:11:13

Thank you, Councillor Brown.

Gery Lemon1:11:15

Um I have very little to say.

Gery Lemon1:11:19

Uh yeah.

Gery Lemon1:11:23

Just one mention in my report, and that is of the uh forty-five million provincial windfall that libraries, public libraries received.

Gery Lemon1:11:39

GVPL, Greater Victoria Public Library, is receiving, and it's called a one-time enhancement grant of $616,000.

Gery Lemon1:11:52

Less than I would have thought.

Gery Lemon1:11:57

So it'll have to be, you know, it's it's it's not it's not the kind of largesse that that um it might appear to be.

Gery Lemon1:12:05

Uh it's to support uh library service enhancements, help address shifting to bands on service, uh collections, programs and spaces, and can enhance municipal local government dollars, but not replace it.

Gery Lemon1:12:20

And uh tomorrow the uh the uh Wanapuca Um Arts Society is holding its its uh gala to it's kind of their coming out party, and uh I'll be there and certainly you people everyone here is invited and perhaps you'll be there too.

Gery Lemon1:12:40

And uh that's it for me on McChair's report.

Gery Lemon1:12:44

And we have a new business item from down the road.

Gery Lemon1:12:49

Um, Councillor McKenzie, Spring and Fall Community Building Event.

Alison MacKenzie1:12:53

Yes, thank you.

Alison MacKenzie1:12:54

Um, so this is uh compared to the rest of the agenda, this is the lighthearted piece.

Alison MacKenzie1:12:59

Um in recent weeks I've noticed the buds starting and flowers starting to bloom.

Alison MacKenzie1:13:06

And um with the inspiration of the Chelsea Flower Show, I thought, why not have a View Royal competition similar to the uh light up View Royal for springtime, so as a community building event.

Alison MacKenzie1:13:22

So similarly it would be for gardens, I was thinking, you know, a competition.

Alison MacKenzie1:13:27

And um for later in the fall, I was also thinking a Halloween decoration competition.

Alison MacKenzie1:13:34

Last year I also saw a number of really good Halloween comp um decorations.

Alison MacKenzie1:13:39

So uh yeah, I just thought I would put that out there to see if if the council would be interested.

Alison MacKenzie1:13:44

And then if so, I think we could probably replicate what we do for light up View Royal.

Alison MacKenzie1:13:52

So yeah.

Alison MacKenzie1:13:54

So do I need to move it and things like that?

Gery Lemon1:13:58

Or sure.

Gery Lemon1:14:03

If you for discussion, do you want to do you want to make a motion and see if there's any uptake?

Alison MacKenzie1:14:09

Yep.

Alison MacKenzie1:14:10

Okay.

Alison MacKenzie1:14:10

So I will make a motion that we have uh both a spring and fall uh community competition for flowers and um Halloween decorations seconder council council counselor Brown seconded and uh motivator do you have any more to add or should I move on?

Gery Lemon1:14:35

No no more to add.

Gery Lemon1:14:37

Counselor Brown, do you want to speak to your seconding no it's a good idea.

Alison MacKenzie1:14:41

It's just something light I'm sure it's not gonna cost a ton of money either just uh like photographs and that kind of thing so similar to view uh the light up view royal I think the cost would just be the prizes um that would be involved counselor rogers yes.

John Rogers1:15:00

So um, you know, with the light up um um uh Council Lemon, you to you taken the initiative and coordinated that and and so on.

John Rogers1:15:08

Um would that be this then something that that you would be coordinating?

Alison MacKenzie1:15:15

I would be happy to, yes.

John Rogers1:15:17

Okay.

John Rogers1:15:17

All right.

John Rogers1:15:18

So that's um, yeah, if if if you could do that, yeah, um I'm in support that uh then it'll help out.

Gery Lemon1:15:26

Mayor Tabais.

Sid Tobias1:15:27

Yeah, thanks for thanks for this, um uh Council McKenzie.

Sid Tobias1:15:30

I think it's a great idea.

Sid Tobias1:15:31

Um too bad we don't have something in the summer right now, because we got the spring covered off and the fall covered off with this and then the winter with the light up view royal.

Sid Tobias1:15:42

We could have a deadline uh dead lawn or dandelion competition, I guess for for front lawns, but that's about it.

John Rogers1:15:49

Staycation vacation.

Sid Tobias1:15:50

We could have a staycation one.

Sid Tobias1:15:52

Um, so what we're looking at, I guess, is just um kind of uh a mayor's credit card purchase of chocolates or something like that that we could coordinate for these two activities.

Sid Tobias1:16:02

Plus, I think Damien did a good job coordinating some of the communication so we could uh wrangle some of his expertise to make it light on staff and just host some things.

Sid Tobias1:16:14

So uh yeah, I'd be very much in favor of this.

Sid Tobias1:16:16

Thanks for bringing it up.

Gery Lemon1:16:19

Maybe we could even have little trophies or you know, some kind or plaque or something.

Gery Lemon1:16:24

I know years ago, um, like counselor Rogers would remember this.

Gery Lemon1:16:28

There was um a uh late spring event of the of an arts and gardens tour that was was pretty cool, but then you know, and people run out of steam or interest, but I I thought that was a really great idea so yeah yeah i'd look forward to seeing um how how you're going to um and i'll work with you um how how you're going to coordinate this before my daffodils die anyway um all those in favor of the motion to have these minutes passed thank you very much and that's it for me passing on to buy us uh I'm on.

Sid Tobias1:17:17

Uh all four go a formal report, but I just want to thank staff again.

Sid Tobias1:17:22

And I was in there as many of you were um looking at the engagement for the budget, and uh just like to thank staff for um putting it all together.

Sid Tobias1:17:32

It's a lot of work um and a lot of options to um to to sort out.

Sid Tobias1:17:38

So thank you very much for your efforts there.

Sid Tobias1:17:40

So we can skip right now to staff reports, and I think we got an action list update for the first quarter.

Sid Tobias1:17:50

I'm gonna appreciate it.

Kim Anema1:17:53

Thank you, Mayor Tobias.

Kim Anema1:17:55

Um I don't have a presentation for you.

Kim Anema1:17:57

The report is for information, it's intended to describe the status of the various resolutions of council.

Gery Lemon1:18:07

Second.

Sid Tobias1:18:08

Uh I don't think there's any discussion, so I don't think I have a question.

Sid Tobias1:18:13

Oh, you've got a question.

Gery Lemon1:18:14

Um yeah, Kim.

Sid Tobias1:18:14

Okay.

Gery Lemon1:18:14

Perhaps you can or or uh the director of engineering can answer.

Gery Lemon1:18:22

Uh the the um January um uh request for an audit on Burnside um a safety audit.

Gery Lemon1:18:33

Has that been done?

Gery Lemon1:18:34

Will that take place?

Gery Lemon1:18:35

Has it taken place?

Gery Lemon1:18:36

Thank you.

Ivan Leung1:18:37

Yeah, thank you for the question, Council Lemon.

Ivan Leung1:18:39

We did uh engage ICBC regarding that issue, and um right now as we speak, you'll you'll notice there's some spray paint marks.

Ivan Leung1:18:47

That's where we're gonna put in some signage, advanced signage for speed and for the curve, as well as uh reflectors.

Ivan Leung1:18:53

Uh, in terms of the actual audit, uh, we did it uh reach out to ICBC as part of their program.

Ivan Leung1:18:59

And um, given that they've looked at uh their five-year period, which is 2017 to 2021, there actually wasn't a lot of incidents at that time.

Ivan Leung1:19:08

So a traffic safety review wasn't warranted for this.

Ivan Leung1:19:12

But that said, we did mention to them that there were two recent that uh we wouldn't mind taking a look at to see what can be done.

Ivan Leung1:19:18

And um as a result of that discussions, uh that is what we're gonna be doing out there.

Ivan Leung1:19:23

This reflector, more reflective um visual cues as well as advanced warning signage.

Sid Tobias1:19:31

Thank you.

Sid Tobias1:19:33

That's great.

Sid Tobias1:19:34

And just uh a question, Kim.

Sid Tobias1:19:36

If uh I'd invite um counselors to review the list uh for the next council of the whole, and if there's questions that arise about why wasn't that thing on it that I thought was, or that um do we really need that still on there?

Sid Tobias1:19:53

Uh just to to help staff out and to to say that might have been previous council's action item list, but is there are we good to move on from that?

Sid Tobias1:20:02

Um so thank you, Kim, for that report.

Sid Tobias1:20:05

That's uh great.

Sid Tobias1:20:06

Anything else to to add to that?

Kim Anema1:20:09

Thank you.

Kim Anema1:20:10

All we need is the vote then.

Sid Tobias1:20:15

We're good to go.

Sid Tobias1:20:16

All in favor?

Sid Tobias1:20:18

Any opposed?

Sid Tobias1:20:19

None opposed.

Sid Tobias1:20:20

Motion carries, and now I think we're down to Don's good work at budget variants and projects update.

Damon Christenson1:20:36

Council, it may look like I'm moving in for the afternoon.

Damon Christenson1:20:38

Indeed.

Damon Christenson1:20:40

We do have several items on your agenda that I have put forward.

Damon Christenson1:20:45

The uh budget project, uh the budget variants and projects update is just the regular monthly update.

Damon Christenson1:20:52

Uh nothing new there of note, other than of course the receipt of the 4.665 million dollars, um, which of course was not in the budget, um, but it would be will be it uh as soon as we get to the next uh the next item or one of the next items nice seconded by councillor lemon is there any discussion counselor just uh because it's my first time around so uh can we still make minor tweaks that to the budget itself uh for the 2023 to 2027 financial plan yes we're not quite there yet yeah uh what's reflected in the current uh budget that you that I have that is the official budget right now is last year's financial plan unless until it gets replaced with this year this five year plan.

Sid Tobias1:21:53

Any other further questions?

Sid Tobias1:21:55

Call the question, I think is in order.

Sid Tobias1:21:57

Move receipts.

Sid Tobias1:21:58

All in favor?

Sid Tobias1:22:00

Any opposed?

Sid Tobias1:22:01

Not opposed.

Sid Tobias1:22:01

Motion carries.

Sid Tobias1:22:03

Next one.

Damon Christenson1:22:05

I believe next up you have the citizen budget online engagement results.

Damon Christenson1:22:11

And I'll just I won't you know go through everything of course.

Damon Christenson1:22:16

I do hope that council took the time to both look at the citizen budget online tool as well as attached to this report are all of the verbatim comments as the good, bad and the ugly, everything.

Damon Christenson1:22:31

It's it's all there for your review.

Damon Christenson1:22:34

So the citizen budget engagement was launched on March 13 and it was held open until April 2, so basically a two year, two week period.

Damon Christenson1:22:45

It provided not only an opportunity for people to comment and to look at what would change if they would, you know, what how it would affect their property taxes if they change certain components of the budget.

Damon Christenson1:22:57

There's information on all of the services, as well as links to the other budget tools that we have, being the financial plan insights on our website and the full budget document that was available to them in all of its detail through links on that engagement tool.

Damon Christenson1:23:15

So we did receive 57 participants this year, which compared favorably to last year.

Damon Christenson1:23:22

Last year we only had 31, which was a bit of a drop, I think.

Damon Christenson1:23:26

I'm hoping just an anomaly.

Damon Christenson1:23:28

I'm hoping that it continues to go up.

Damon Christenson1:23:31

But uh, you know, of the 57 participants, 10 per just about 11% of them actually completed um the the whole survey.

Damon Christenson1:23:40

So so that's something to keep in mind.

Damon Christenson1:23:42

And and you know, while these might not seem like astounding numbers, they certainly do compare favorably when you consider that we used to have public open houses that would we were happy if we got five or six people out to those.

Damon Christenson1:23:56

Financial plans are are not often a big draw, not in just this community, but many of the ones I've worked with previously.

Damon Christenson1:24:04

So I I think what is um important to realize is that generally speaking, um the the respondents, the participants did uh generally support the direction of our financial plan that we have proposed, and that they indicated that View Roll provides either very good or fairly good value.

Damon Christenson1:24:26

That's 84% of the respondents that indicated either very good or fairly good value for their tax dollars, and that's an important measure.

Damon Christenson1:24:34

However, I do need to remind council that the tool is not a statistically significant survey.

Damon Christenson1:24:43

People know self-selected.

Damon Christenson1:24:46

There's it is not a blind study, or you know, so do do keep that in mind while it it may indicate a flavor of of some interest out there and maybe generate some ideas and discussions.

Damon Christenson1:24:59

It should not be considered as representative of all of you royal uh constituents.

Damon Christenson1:25:06

So that I just offer for council's consideration.

Damon Christenson1:25:10

That's my report.

Don Brown1:25:14

Thank you.

Don Brown1:25:14

Uh discussion, Council Brent.

Don Brown1:25:17

So it sounds like a lot of people, well, no, a lot of the people that filled it in, they didn't necessarily fill in all the questions.

Don Brown1:25:22

So they probably had areas of specific concerns or interest to them, and they filled those in and not the rest.

Damon Christenson1:25:28

In entirely possible, and I would say likely.

Don Brown1:25:31

Yeah, thank you.

Sid Tobias1:25:35

Yeah, I was uh I went through the um engagement and actually filled it out.

Sid Tobias1:25:40

Um I thought the questions were constructed quite well, and I thought it broke it down quite logically.

Sid Tobias1:25:45

Um but I think you know, my comment's gonna suffice to say on the number of engagements that we do.

Sid Tobias1:25:52

And it's not just a strategy, it's um using our social media to remind and drive people back to that as well as reaching out to uh community associations and get people in those areas, like View Royal has certain areas that are covered off by Facebook groups or View Royal as a whole.

Sid Tobias1:26:13

And I think it's up to us to drive people to these surveys as much as possible, not staff and council.

Sid Tobias1:26:20

Um, because I think your your rate of return as we look more towards engagement, it's like how do we get people there, right?

Sid Tobias1:26:29

That's the big thing.

Sid Tobias1:26:30

Once they're on the web page then they can they can you know fill out the surveys or whatever it is that we're we're we would like input on.

Sid Tobias1:26:39

But it's just getting them there and getting them alerted because there's a lot of noise out there of people's uh inboxes being full with stuff.

Sid Tobias1:26:48

But I think a common way to do that would be a way to drive more.

Sid Tobias1:26:51

But thanks for this very much.

Sid Tobias1:26:53

I thought it was very helpful.

Sid Tobias1:26:55

I don't think there was anything that I didn't expect to come out of the uh results.

Sid Tobias1:27:00

Um I think overall it's it's kind of an okay endorsement for those who did participate that we made some uh decisions that were in line with expectations um and there was no surprises there and there's polarization on either end of that uh to be sure.

Sid Tobias1:27:18

Uh so all in favor of uh receiving uh any post?

Sid Tobias1:27:26

Not a post.

Sid Tobias1:27:28

Um I think you're up here for the next one as well, Don.

Damon Christenson1:27:33

Twenty twenty three to twenty twenty-seven financial plan approval.

Damon Christenson1:27:38

So council is aware, of course, that we have been working on the budget now for several months, and council especially spent uh significant amount of time in February reviewing all of the details of the financial plan.

Damon Christenson1:27:54

The results of those discussions you will see attached as schedule A and Schedule B to the report, noting all of the changes in great detail to the financial plan.

Damon Christenson1:28:09

After the public of the proposed financial plan, and by publication I mean launching the citizen budget online tool and all of the documents and the financial plan insights, council considered the parking lot items.

Damon Christenson1:28:25

And out of the discussion of the parking lot items came a reduction of the public safety building landscaping item, a reduction of $20,000.

Damon Christenson1:28:36

So you will see we've added that to Schedule A, sorry, on Schedule B, noted it in red at the bottom of Schedule B as a reduction in $20,000 as that was funded from casino revenue.

Damon Christenson1:28:53

Staff are recommending consideration of at least two other items, one being that of building inspection.

Damon Christenson1:29:04

As you can appreciate, pinning a budget down at a particular point in time is a little bit difficult, difficult, is is challenging when information doesn't all come to you in completely all at the same time.

Damon Christenson1:29:19

And when we looked at what we allowed for building inspection, considering the vacancy that was in the building inspection department at the time, and we we learned more as we went further along in the in the financial planning process.

Damon Christenson1:29:34

What we're recommending now is that we add $40,000 to the budget for building inspection to make sure that we have we are able to provide the full building inspection service.

Damon Christenson1:29:45

This will require a contractor help.

Damon Christenson1:29:48

And because it is just a temporary measure, we believe that it would be fine to fund that from casino revenue so it would have no impact to taxation.

Damon Christenson1:29:57

So that is one uh recommendation that uh we would appreciate council's endorsement at this time, or you know, if if there is an alternative that council has in mind, it's certainly willing to give you advice on that as well.

Damon Christenson1:30:11

Additionally, you are aware that we received the $4.665 million in Growing Communities Fund.

Damon Christenson1:30:18

What we were looking for today is authorization, in other words, inclusion in the financial plan by law that I will be bringing back to you to transfer that to the reserve.

Damon Christenson1:30:30

That I believe we've got first three readings to create the reserve as required by the province for that fund.

Damon Christenson1:30:37

As far as use of that fund, we're saying we have a five-year horizon to spend that money in.

Damon Christenson1:30:46

I'm thinking that the advice that I could give is let's take our time, consider all of the options, consider staff's professional recommendation, consider all of the things that we could do and the priorities that council has for that money.

Damon Christenson1:31:04

And let's make a plan this year.

Damon Christenson1:31:07

If there isn't anything urgent, we certainly can include all of the uses in the next budget cycle.

Damon Christenson1:31:15

If there is something urgent, we could amend the budget later on this year.

Damon Christenson1:31:34

If there are others, um, now would be the time to make those um recommendations, and if council endorses them, they would then be included in the financial plan bylaw that is returned to you next.

Damon Christenson1:31:49

Um, we would return the f the bylaw for first, second, and third reading on April 18 and adopt it on May 2nd.

Sid Tobias1:31:59

Thank you, Don.

Sid Tobias1:32:00

Now that's Sage Lee advice.

Sid Tobias1:32:02

I think um the building inspector change casino revenue.

Sid Tobias1:32:08

I mean, with the amount of holes we've got on the ground right now, um having a building inspector, especially some of the other challenged province properties that we've got right now.

Sid Tobias1:32:18

We need there's no question we need a building inspector, and they're just they're not falling out of trees.

Sid Tobias1:32:23

Um so I appreciate your efforts in both trying to hire and secure.

Sid Tobias1:32:28

Couldn't agree more with uh taking our time and getting it right for the 4.66 million.

Sid Tobias1:32:29

Um I think uh you know there's there's some debate uh we've got to do, and just to be clear and remind myself and council, there are some parameters around the spending of that 4.66.

Sid Tobias1:32:46

And what was clear to me in reading it was if what you're proposing is covered in any way by any other type of grant, this is not to be used for that.

Sid Tobias1:32:56

If you're just waiting for that grant, then you wait for that grant, don't use this money for that kind of thing.

Sid Tobias1:33:03

So just keep in mind when we're um bringing that down to priorities.

Sid Tobias1:33:07

Let's go to Councilor Brown and then Councilor Rogers.

Don Brown1:33:10

Yeah, I'd like to make a motion that we add the forty thousand dollars for the building inspection department and then I'll speak to it after I if I get a seconder.

Sid Tobias1:33:21

I'm not so sure if you have to move that uh right now or or we would we want to we'd we'd want to okay and uh second to go ahead councillor Brandon Yeah I realize the need for uh a level three building inspector so you you need to have the mentor and I think we have a great mentor in place so it makes total sense.

Don Brown1:33:43

Counselor Lemon, did you want to add?

Gery Lemon1:33:46

Uh no, uh it it's if it's if it's coming out of casino and there's lots of room in casino and it's not gonna affect taxation and it's a necessity.

Gery Lemon1:33:56

So I'm comfortable with it.

John Rogers1:33:58

Thank you, Councilor Rogers.

John Rogers1:33:59

Actually, yeah, we're no I'm gonna be speaking about the 4.6 million, so we can deal with this one on the floor at the motion first.

Sid Tobias1:34:08

So all in favor of the uh amount of expenditure for casino revenue, I think $40,000 for a building inspector.

Sid Tobias1:34:17

There's a motion on the table.

Sid Tobias1:34:19

Uh any opposed, then oppose that carries.

Sid Tobias1:34:22

And I think you wanted to start a discussion.

Sid Tobias1:34:25

We want a motion on the table about the 4.6 million.

Sid Tobias1:34:27

What and did you have in your mind about?

Sid Tobias1:34:30

Because there was several actions for the growing community fund.

Damon Christenson1:34:35

First, we need to yes, uh, if you will, uh, Mayor Tobias.

Damon Christenson1:34:41

Really, really all we're looking for at this point in time is authorization to include the transfer to reserve for the 4.665 million dollars.

Damon Christenson1:34:49

We can defer any future decision about the uses of those funds to future financial plans or future discussions later on in the year, certainly.

Damon Christenson1:34:58

And and if I may, um, you know, reiterate what you were saying about the conditions of the grant.

Damon Christenson1:35:05

Um, there are several conditions of the grant, and staff are working on a report that gives council the fulsome discussion on what those mean.

Damon Christenson1:35:16

There is um more detailed information available on the ministry's website.

Damon Christenson1:35:20

We've also been in touch with the ministry.

Damon Christenson1:35:21

We want to get this right.

Damon Christenson1:35:23

Certainly, what you what you referred to we call the concept of incrementality, which means it must be incremental to our budget so so we want to delve into that at a uh in a report in a at a future date good thank you uh Don Councillor Roger yeah um certainly looking forward to that and what the definitions are I guess um again I'll reiterate the uh the whole concern about uh if it's anything to do with grants grants are real and they are artificial so if we have unilaterally decided that something was never going to happen and we made it dependent upon a grant uh and therefore it wouldn't, that means it would this uh item would never be uh allocated or be um uh have the achievements of this 4.6 million.

John Rogers1:36:11

I would be taking great exception to that so um let's see how that unfolds, whether these artificial requirements set by council um are real or not.

John Rogers1:36:26

And I'll I'll give you, I guess, one one example, you know.

John Rogers1:36:29

Well, we had um the Island Highway Project grant, grant, grant.

John Rogers1:36:32

We're never gonna get the grant.

John Rogers1:36:34

It's just unbelievably unlikely uh for the cost that we're we're putting in for and and uh and and so on and so forth.

John Rogers1:36:43

So it's um you know that means that you know we could because we would be suggesting we're putting it into a grant, we couldn't even use this 4.6 million even for a portion of.

John Rogers1:36:53

So that's just one of those possible barriers that this uh the provincial requirements may land us in.

Sid Tobias1:37:03

Yeah, I think my understanding of it is if you've applied for a grant and have not been successful, then it would make it eligible for this one.

Sid Tobias1:37:12

If you were had a project that you're gonna apply for a grant, but never applied for the grant, don't use this money until you exhaust the grant option first.

Sid Tobias1:37:23

That that that's where the the caveat was.

Sid Tobias1:37:29

Um interestingly, on the points of grant and speaking with the mayor of Callwood, they have hired somebody that's all they do is write grants for the town, and I think they've secured forty-five million dollars in grants for this year.

Sid Tobias1:37:44

Counselor McKenzie.

Sid Tobias1:37:46

Just saying.

Sid Tobias1:37:48

So it goes on how you write them as well.

Alison MacKenzie1:37:52

I think uh the idea was being floated around to whether this having this uh fund reserve fund with the 4.6 million, um could that then uh our other reserve fund could we remove the money that we put into there since we have this new reserve?

Alison MacKenzie1:38:16

Is that an option?

Damon Christenson1:38:20

So if I may, that is one of the things that could be addressed in a future staff report.

Damon Christenson1:38:26

I'm I'm probably better to defer discussion on that till we've completed our fulsome analysis.

Damon Christenson1:38:33

And and uh thank you for the question, and we'll make sure that we answer that in the staff report.

Alison MacKenzie1:38:38

And sorry, and so will that staff report be in in before we finalize this budget?

Alison MacKenzie1:38:43

Is that or is that like down the road?

Damon Christenson1:38:48

We don't need for decisions to be made on the uses of this fund uh for this current financial plan bylaw.

Damon Christenson1:38:56

It can be included in the next iteration of the five-year plan, or if there's something that we must do this year and we want to use that money for and it's eligible, we can certainly amend the budget at a later date.

Alison MacKenzie1:39:10

Okay, thank you.

Alison MacKenzie1:39:11

Councilor Brown.

Damon Christenson1:39:13

I'd like to make a motion we put the 4.6 million into our reserve uh create a bylaw for to put to put the money into the reserve fund a second sorry but i thought we did that last council um when that was presented you we do we have a staff report on that at council what what we did at the last council meet uh through through the mayor um is we created the reserve fund that would accept this money the financial plan needs to authorize the transfer to that fund.

Damon Christenson1:39:48

It's a two-stepper.

Sid Tobias1:39:52

Second so uh so we got uh the motion, uh second or I'll call the question.

Sid Tobias1:39:58

All in favor.

Sid Tobias1:40:00

Any opposed?

Sid Tobias1:40:01

None opposed.

Sid Tobias1:40:02

So we can we now have an account and we can deposit the money into it.

Sid Tobias1:40:06

Councilor Brown.

Don Brown1:40:08

Sorry, no, this may be not the right time, but uh we had a municipal employee for the RCMP that was in our budget.

Don Brown1:40:16

We moved basically moved everything up one year, basically.

Don Brown1:40:19

So that municipal employee um the funding wouldn't be there until next year for half a year.

Don Brown1:40:26

So um what I would I know they asked for five thousand dollars to do the hiring.

Don Brown1:40:32

And and I don't know if I get a second or if I make a motion or not, but to add five thousand dollars to the to this year's budget to do the hiring so that employee could start on January 1st.

Don Brown1:40:42

Of course, we'd have to increase the next year's budget too for like full year for the municipal employee.

Don Brown1:40:44

I'm just concerned because we're not we're not really fulfilling the 3.3 to 1 ratio.

Don Brown1:40:54

Um it made sense to move it.

Don Brown1:40:56

And take it takes time to hire that person as well.

Don Brown1:40:58

So uh with the security clearances and everything needed, uh and uh the five thousand dollars is not a huge increase through 2023, although it would, I think it was was it 40?

Don Brown1:41:08

I think it was 40,000 and and to make it 80,000 for the next year.

Don Brown1:41:13

So that person could potentially start in January 1st, if they advertise and hired somebody rather than waiting all the way to next July, that seems like a long, long wait.

Don Brown1:41:24

I think it was 40 to start that person July the first, uh, but but but a still with five thousand dollars to do the the Langford to do the hiring because it's gonna be a Langford employee, I understand.

Damon Christenson1:41:43

If I understand you correctly, uh Counselor Brown, uh and through the chair, um you're asking to do two things.

Damon Christenson1:41:51

One is bring five thousand of the of that proposal to 2023 to initiate the hiring and then increase the um budget for 2024 so that it's a full year's salary as opposed to a half a year.

Don Brown1:42:07

Yeah, that's correct.

Don Brown1:42:08

Uh well when we went through this, I know it made a lot of sense to push things up, and I'm aware of the time it takes to to do the hiring and a security clearance.

Don Brown1:42:16

And to me, it just seems like we're in April now and they're gonna wait over a year to get that municipal employee in place.

Don Brown1:42:23

So um would it be time to make a motion to to to add that, or is there is it is it not the time and place?

Sid Tobias1:42:30

Uh I think first we let's lay the land out.

Sid Tobias1:42:32

I mean you're well briefed on it right now.

Sid Tobias1:42:34

Um and I think Councillor Brown, where you're going is there was a request for an additional admin support staff for the RCMP, and they wanted initially for it to start this summer or fall, I think.

Don Brown1:42:49

Yeah, it was to start July of of this year.

Sid Tobias1:42:52

And we as a council pushed it one year out to next July.

Sid Tobias1:42:58

But what you're suggesting is that um that position is needed more now and it would uh perhaps be a bridge if we had them start in January by July.

Sid Tobias1:43:14

That would be a bit more than five thousand dollars, would it not?

Don Brown1:43:17

Well it would be five thousand dollars because we we we had it in their budget to do the hiring process, five thousand, but forty it'd be adding forty thousand to the twenty twenty-four budget.

Don Brown1:43:27

Because if we only had forty in there, and it would be jump up to eighty.

Don Brown1:43:31

But then we wouldn't have to put the five in twenty twenty-four because we've done it in twenty twenty-three.

Don Brown1:43:35

Yeah, um, it's kind of splitting hairs.

Don Brown1:43:37

But uh it yeah, to me, to to go all the way to July of next year, that's that's you know, fourteen or fifteen months away.

Don Brown1:43:43

And I'm uh and I you know um I know they need the help.

Sid Tobias1:43:50

Thoughts and discussion.

Sid Tobias1:43:53

Counselor I would second the motion I'll turn to you uh and you you've already motivated a little bit but what would the impact be for uh for the town if we didn't support this and I know you said it, but what's the impact rate now of not having that admin?

Don Brown1:44:22

Well, I'm I'm aware uh the need that and they're they're already increasing their uniform staff.

Don Brown1:44:27

So um I guess one concern is that we're not meeting that three to one ratio, which isn't the end of the world.

Don Brown1:44:33

However, I know they need the help, and it's we're in April now and to wait to July of 2024, and again, it takes time to do the hiring and the security clearance.

Don Brown1:44:42

And I think it would be um it's kind of a split between what they asked for.

Don Brown1:44:47

They're uh they're getting it six months later, but they're not getting a whole year later.

Sid Tobias1:44:55

Uh Don, I'll turn to you.

Sid Tobias1:44:57

What would that do to affect what you've diligently put together so far for a budget?

Damon Christenson1:45:05

Thank you, Chair.

Damon Christenson1:45:06

I am looking at the uh N053, which is the policing municipal employee.

Damon Christenson1:45:12

We have budgeted $50,000, which does include the 5,000 for 2024, fiscal year two in the financial plan and zero in fiscal year one.

Damon Christenson1:45:22

This uh project is 100% funded by taxation.

Damon Christenson1:45:26

So certainly, if you are to change this number and affect anything for 2023, now would be the time to do it.

Damon Christenson1:45:34

I might just add that uh while the request from the uh RCMP is based on a three to one ratio, it is based on our authorized strength of thirteen point three five, which historically has not always been fulfilled.

Damon Christenson1:45:54

I can't quote you off the top of my head the number of FTTs, FTEs by which it has not been fulfilled.

Damon Christenson1:46:05

I'm just making an observation that while the authorized strength is 13.35, we have, I don't, I am not aware that we have fully reached that 13.35 yet.

Damon Christenson1:46:17

Our CAO may be able to provide you with further enlightenment than I can.

Levi Megenbir1:46:24

Councilor Brown.

Don Brown1:46:25

Yeah, and I believe Superintendent Preston basically indicated that we were were close to that or at it anyway.

Don Brown1:46:31

And I realize that can fluctuate definitely when people go on maternity leave or long term sick um typically money gets returned to the municipalities if they haven't used the full FTs.

Sid Tobias1:46:50

Kim I was just going to ask you to provide some words of wisdom.

Kim Anema1:46:54

So based on the track record for the RCMP, we probably don't need to make an amendment to the current year's budget to allow for that 5,000 because it's very likely that the RCMP budget will be underspent on the basis of them not meeting their authorized strength.

Kim Anema1:47:11

$5,000 is a relatively small amount compared to the impact of not having authorized strength for the entire year.

Kim Anema1:47:21

What council does need to do if they agree with with with counselor Brown is pass a resolution to amend the 2024 budget to fully fund an employee from January 1 to December 31st and that estimate is uh somewhere in the $80,000 range which represents uh not not quite a one percent increase in the um tax rate however council is already committed to have that council I think I'm hesitant to uh reverse a a decision that we made during the budget discussions where we had the full council here without a a more pressing need for it.

Alison MacKenzie1:48:16

Um yeah, I think I I I don't really I know uh they would like to have it, of course, but I I just don't see based on what um the CAO said, I don't think we need to go back on what we agreed already.

Sid Tobias1:48:38

Thank you, uh Councillor Lemon and Councillor What.

Gery Lemon1:48:41

Um Don, can you refresh us on what the 2024 bottom line tax increase was going to look like as per, you know, what what was before us without us having much in the way of of um discussion.

Damon Christenson1:49:02

Uh through the chair on attached to the 2023 to 2027 financial plan approval report is Schedule A, and there is a column in there labeled 2024 that the revised increase for 2024, the impact of taxation.

Damon Christenson1:49:21

I think that's what you're asking for 2024 is 9.59.

Damon Christenson1:49:28

Does that answer your question, Counselor Lemmon?

Gery Lemon1:49:31

It does.

Gery Lemon1:49:32

And so what this possibility would do would be put it over 10%.

Damon Christenson1:49:39

I I would agree that's a the very close, yes.

Gery Lemon1:49:42

Okay.

Sid Tobias1:49:54

And and I'll just note I'm supportive of the need, but we went and and carefully cut even staff recommendations of stuff we need here at Pew Royal.

Sid Tobias1:50:06

So while I am empathetic to, you know, um being fully staffed uh for the RCMP and have a a full thing there.

Sid Tobias1:50:17

I think we went out with uh trying to keep this under 10%, and we're not gonna do that if we if we do it.

Sid Tobias1:50:24

Um there may be efficiencies later on, but I think that um we've we've agreed to that with two members that unfortunately aren't with us this evening and uh and I think that's the expectation we came away with.

Sid Tobias1:50:37

So I I mean in spirit I support it you know and if they were willing to work for free I'd support that too but not at putting our tax rate I think at over 10%.

Sid Tobias1:50:47

Council Rogers.

John Rogers1:50:49

Yeah.

John Rogers1:50:50

So um you know it it's kind of like a black and white situation.

John Rogers1:50:55

You know we keep it at at the uh the 40 but there's uh there's all sorts of grades.

John Rogers1:51:01

You could start it up, uh, you know, there may be consideration, and once we have a um of all council here, we may decide to start it in February.

John Rogers1:51:08

So that would be another 20 000.

John Rogers1:51:11

To say that you know we're fixed uh for the 2024 budget is a little premature.

John Rogers1:51:18

There are other things that are kind of coming on.

John Rogers1:51:20

Oh my goodness, staff are, you know, we got reports that are suggesting that we need a transportation, active transportation coordinator.

John Rogers1:51:26

That might be cost a little more.

John Rogers1:51:28

So there's all sorts of uh proposals of FTEs um and um um and who knows what um you know what assistance that 4.6 million dollars will do for us in terms of no longer having or you know two reserves and so on so um yeah, we're not fixed.

John Rogers1:51:46

And I think that um when council comes back, we have another look and see if we can't move it up, you know, to a certain degree.

John Rogers1:51:53

That'll keep us under that dreaded 10%.

John Rogers1:51:56

Thank you.

Sid Tobias1:51:56

Thank you.

Sid Tobias1:51:57

Could you remind me?

Sid Tobias1:52:01

Um Councilor Brown, did you have that in motion?

Don Brown1:52:05

Well, perhaps I could amend my own motion to uh make it through uh the funding to go.

Don Brown1:52:11

Okay, we can forget about this year, but we could uh amend my motion so that the uh the hiring for the person and potentially could be starting on April 1st.

Don Brown1:52:23

So that wouldn't be as big a hit uh rather than July the first, and then we'd have to include the the 5,000 or whatever it costs to do the hiring process.

Don Brown1:52:31

So nothing in 2023 but to start that position on on April 1st as opposed to July the first.

John Rogers1:52:39

And I was taking that as placeholder so that we've got it and we got the motion, we've got that consideration, and when we start and staff being aware of this when they start their early discussions in November um maybe uh uh counselor brown you can add that to your counselor wish list of in initiatives um so that we can still remember that and reflect upon it uh early in the tax consideration year right and and and just for information the RCMP's fiscal year is April first so it kind of ties in I think there may be some support for that.

Sid Tobias1:53:19

So is there any other comments?

Sid Tobias1:53:21

Do we want to call the question that the um current budget has that start in July?

Sid Tobias1:53:29

Councilor Brown has uh moved that we start that in April of 2024.

Sid Tobias1:53:37

Um and that would be a couple of months salary for a support person.

Sid Tobias1:53:41

Other than that, that would not affect budget for this year.

Sid Tobias1:53:45

It would affect it when we uh bring considerations for next year.

Sid Tobias1:53:50

So if there's no further comments, I'll call the question.

Sid Tobias1:53:53

All in favor.

Sid Tobias1:53:56

And Councilor Lemon, you're opposed.

Speaker_Unknown1:53:59

Okay.

Sid Tobias1:54:00

Uh Council Lemon was opposed.

Sid Tobias1:54:02

So that adds some clarity, Don, that you weren't anticipating, but got it anyway.

Speaker_041:54:08

Perfectly fine.

Speaker_041:54:09

Thank you so much.

Sid Tobias1:54:14

All right.

Sid Tobias1:54:15

And go ahead with your tax rate option.

Damon Christenson1:54:18

Well, I see that I'm a little bit concerned about our time.

Damon Christenson1:54:23

I want to uh this I I consider the main event.

Damon Christenson1:54:28

As it this does require a little bit of in-depth um thought and careful understanding.

Damon Christenson1:54:37

I do include in this presentation a little bit of a I want to call it uh tax rates 101 for those of you who may not have been involved in a tax rate setting in a municipal um process before.

Damon Christenson1:54:54

I want to remind council that when we say tax rates here, what we're talking about is the municipal view royal tax rates, not capital regional district, not capital regional district hospital, and not school taxes.

Damon Christenson1:55:09

And those are some of the big ticket items, not BC Transit, right?

Damon Christenson1:55:12

So we're just talking about municipal taxes.

Damon Christenson1:55:37

I think we're going.

Damon Christenson1:55:38

Are you do are you advancing?

Damon Christenson1:55:39

Clerk, we got it.

Damon Christenson1:55:40

I'm I think I've got it now.

Damon Christenson1:55:42

All right.

Damon Christenson1:55:43

Okay, so what we're gonna do is as I'm gonna give you a very brief uh property taxes 101.

Damon Christenson1:55:49

We're gonna talk a little bit about the components of the process, and we're gonna talk about assessments and and the context that we see those assessments in.

Damon Christenson1:55:58

We're gonna talk about the regional um, you know, what's happening across the region with tax rates.

Damon Christenson1:56:03

Of course, I'm only gonna be able to look at 2022, but still that does give a flavor of of uh you know how we compare with our our neighbors uh in tax rates.

Damon Christenson1:56:14

We're gonna look at some of the scenarios that we prepared for discussion.

Damon Christenson1:56:18

It is a little bit of a a la carte menu sometimes.

Damon Christenson1:56:21

You can pick and choose.

Damon Christenson1:56:23

And then it will be, of course, your turn to ask questions and importantly provide direction to staff because after today, we need to bring a tax rates bylaw back to you for approval prior to the May 15 legislative deadline.

Damon Christenson1:56:42

So setting municipal tax rates is a little bit like trying to do one of these sliding tile puzzles, if you will.

Damon Christenson1:56:50

A 2D version of the Rubik's Cube.

Damon Christenson1:56:52

You can think of it.

Damon Christenson1:56:53

Some of the tiles are stuck in one place or difficult to shift, or when you move one, it affects all of the other ones and it but most importantly, they are restricted by the boundary, right?

Damon Christenson1:57:05

We have those edges that uh on on the sides that we can't get past.

Damon Christenson1:57:10

Property assessments are determined by BC assessment.

Damon Christenson1:57:13

They are independent, they fall under the assessment authority and other acts.

Damon Christenson1:57:14

They are governed by a board of directors and are accountable to the province.

Damon Christenson1:57:25

It is important to understand that View Royal and View Royals Council has virtually no influence over property assessment values.

Damon Christenson1:57:35

It actually is a good thing for property owners since the property taxes that are based on these assessments comprise a significant part of View Royal's revenue each year.

Damon Christenson1:57:47

So you wouldn't have the fox watching the hen house.

Damon Christenson1:57:50

So we are glad to have BC assessment assigning those assessed values impartially.

Damon Christenson1:57:57

Properties are assigned a property class, and we're going to be seeing those.

Damon Christenson1:58:01

Class one is residential, class six is business, and those are the two significant classes in View Royal.

Damon Christenson1:58:10

And those are based on the property's type or use.

Damon Christenson1:58:14

Municipal zoning does not necessarily determine the property class, although it may be a factor in some cases.

Damon Christenson1:58:30

Setting purposes, there can only be one residential tax rate.

Damon Christenson1:58:34

So you're going to see that a little bit later on.

Damon Christenson1:58:38

Assessed values are set as of July 1, the prior year.

Damon Christenson1:58:43

And I know this has been a bit of a tumultuous year.

Damon Christenson1:58:45

So you may have talked to constituents who said, I got my assessments notice in January.

Damon Christenson1:58:51

There is no way my property is worth that.

Damon Christenson1:58:54

But if they think back to the world on July 1st, they might better understand a little bit about why that difference may occur.

Damon Christenson1:59:04

Assessments each year include the changes that result from factors relating to the property.

Damon Christenson1:59:10

I'm talking about new construction, demolition of existing improvements, reclassification of properties based on the status when it is you know when it is evaluated.

Damon Christenson1:59:22

Perhaps it will received a rezoning.

Damon Christenson1:59:24

Perhaps vacant land was classed that was classed as class six becomes class one due to a rezoning, or it becomes tax exempt if there was a permissive tax exemption or that sort of thing.

Damon Christenson1:59:36

These are non-market changes because the change in assessments are driven by some factor other than supply and demand.

Damon Christenson1:59:44

So we talked a little bit about non-market changes on our estimates in February during the budget setting process.

Damon Christenson1:59:53

Today, what we're looking at really and what we're discussing and what I'm presenting to you are the effects of our scenarios before the non-market changes have affected, uh you know, have been included in the assessments.

Damon Christenson2:00:09

So we differentiate between market assessment changes, and that's what we're going to be talking about today, and and so the impacts that I'm going to show you are before we add in those non market changes.

Damon Christenson2:00:25

So these are this is really the taxpayers who paid taxes in 2022.

Damon Christenson2:00:30

Those are the people that those are the property owners that we're talking about.

Damon Christenson2:00:36

Some things have changed since we talked about assessments in February, and that's because BC assessment provided the completed role in January, and that's the on which we we provided uh the analysis of what the impact of uh the budget when we were talking about it then.

Damon Christenson2:00:56

Um that was based on the completed assessment role, and now we have the revised assessment road.

Damon Christenson2:01:04

It's another cycle in BC assessments process.

Damon Christenson2:01:07

So some of the numbers are different, some of the numbers have changed.

Damon Christenson2:01:13

Additionally, we have this is a little bit of an unusual year.

Damon Christenson2:01:17

I haven't necessarily had this happen before.

Damon Christenson2:01:19

We experienced supplementary assessments that affected our 2022 revenue.

Damon Christenson2:01:28

So some of the attachments to the report, you will see that your 9.97% you sent me away in February to calculate for for the financial plan is now more like 10.1%, and that's because when we compare it to 2022, one of one of the things going to happen to make that percentage increase.

Damon Christenson2:01:52

Either we've raised our revenue requirement, which we haven't done, or the base year got smaller.

Damon Christenson2:02:00

And that's what happened in this case.

Damon Christenson2:02:02

2022 revenue decreased as a result of a couple of supplementary assessments.

Damon Christenson2:02:09

By and large, all of the properties that were not affected by the supplementary assessments have the exactly the same effect as we talked in February, unless they were some that were caught up in a in a different in a different change on the revised rule.

Damon Christenson2:02:25

So property assessments comprise one of these tiles that View Royal Council doesn't really have a lot of options about changing.

Damon Christenson2:02:35

You're going to hear references today to the average or representative property.

Damon Christenson2:02:40

And it's really important to understand that this measure helps us figure out the impact of tax rating, tax rate setting on any given property class or individual property, but it is not perfect, and you're going to see that in a few minutes.

Damon Christenson2:02:55

It's generally more useful, most useful for classes that have a large number of properties.

Damon Christenson2:03:02

And in View royal, really, that's only the residential class.

Damon Christenson2:03:09

You're going to hear tax burden.

Damon Christenson2:03:13

Let's understand that concept.

Damon Christenson2:03:15

What is that?

Damon Christenson2:03:16

When we talk about tax burden, we're really talking about the relative amount or percentage of total taxes, total revenue, that is levied against a particular property class.

Damon Christenson2:03:32

So for example, if the residential class burden is 70%, what we mean by that is that 70% of the total municipal tax revenue is coming from the properties in the residential class.

Damon Christenson2:03:48

So it relates to the proportionate share each class will contribute towards the total tax revenue for the municipality.

Damon Christenson2:03:58

In 2022, nearly 72% of the municipal tax revenue came from the residential class, and 27% came from the business class.

Damon Christenson2:04:09

The tax burden shifts with changes in assessments and in changes to the tax ratios.

Damon Christenson2:04:18

We're going to talk about tax ratios in a second.

Damon Christenson2:04:21

In 2023, there isn't that much of a shift in assessments between the business and residential class.

Damon Christenson2:04:30

In fact, if we didn't change the tax ratios at all, it would only result in about a 0.06% shift away from other classes, primarily the business class, to the residential class.

Damon Christenson2:04:45

So while not all classes increased their assessments by the same percentage, the two most significant classes being residential and business had a similar experience in percent increase in assessments.

Damon Christenson2:05:07

Tax revenue requirement.

Damon Christenson2:05:08

We just talked about that.

Damon Christenson2:05:10

How much money does our financial plan need to be raised through taxation?

Damon Christenson2:05:17

This is the amount that is determined through the financial planning process.

Damon Christenson2:05:22

And we talked then about an overall tax increase.

Damon Christenson2:05:26

That was that 9.97% affected to the market component of our tax of our assessments.

Damon Christenson2:05:35

So the legislation requires us to determine this amount prior to having this conversation about tax rates.

Damon Christenson2:05:44

We need to understand how much we need to raise through taxation before we talk about what the tax rates should be.

Damon Christenson2:05:52

So at this point in time, we're going to assume that we are not going to change the financial plan to increase more or less taxation than is in that plan right now.

Damon Christenson2:06:08

Legislation actually requires for the financial plan by law to be adopted prior to adoption of the tax rates by law.

Damon Christenson2:06:14

So council determines this little component of our puzzle through the financial planning process, but we're going to assume at this point in time that that's not going to change.

Damon Christenson2:06:28

Tax ratios.

Damon Christenson2:06:30

You're going to hear this term interchangeable with multiples.

Damon Christenson2:06:35

Okay.

Damon Christenson2:06:36

So legislation requires BC assessment to classify, of course, the properties as we talked about according to type or use.

Damon Christenson2:06:43

And we can set the municipality can set different rates for different property classes.

Damon Christenson2:06:51

The relationship between the rates is what is meant by tax ratios or tax rate multiples.

Damon Christenson2:06:58

So the residential property class is the base.

Damon Christenson2:06:58

Residential property class has a multiple of one.

Damon Christenson2:07:04

It is the one in the ratio factor.

Damon Christenson2:07:08

All other rates are expressed as a multiple of the residential rate.

Damon Christenson2:07:42

This is meaningful.

Damon Christenson2:07:45

You can bet that commercial businesses out there are looking at the region's business class multiple to understand what their tax scenario is going to be.

Damon Christenson2:08:05

Okay.

Damon Christenson2:08:07

Tax ratios are the tool available to council to achieve certain objectives by adjusting the multiples accordingly.

Damon Christenson2:08:15

If all other multiples in the surrounding area has a business class multiple of three and a half, and council wanted to attract more business to the municipality, you would think about reducing the business cost multiple because if everything else is equal, businesses are going to be more interested in the municipality with the lower tax multiple.

Damon Christenson2:08:39

However, just like in our little puzzle analogy, any change to one multiple is going to affect the amount of taxes collected from the other property classes.

Damon Christenson2:08:50

A reduction in one class multiple will shift the amount of taxes away from that class to all the other classes.

Damon Christenson2:08:58

Since the total amount of the revenue needed isn't changing, that's like the size of the puzzle.

Damon Christenson2:09:04

It's just a matter of which class is going to pay more or less.

Damon Christenson2:09:09

That's the effect of the multiples.

Damon Christenson2:09:16

So what we've seen is that property assessments are provided by BC assessment independent from View Royal.

Damon Christenson2:09:26

The average or representative property is really just math that calculates the average on those assessments and using the counts within each of those classes.

Damon Christenson2:09:38

The tax burden is going to change when the assessed values change between the classes or when tax rates or multiples change.

Damon Christenson2:09:46

So we do have some influence over that.

Damon Christenson2:09:50

Council determines, of course, how much revenue is required to be raised through taxes, but of course, that decision is pretty much already done.

Damon Christenson2:09:58

So at this point in time, that's not going to be something that we we are going to be changing or can easily be changed.

Damon Christenson2:10:05

However, today's discussion really is going to be about the tax ratios.

Damon Christenson2:10:10

It's more about the who pays as opposed to the total amount.

Damon Christenson2:10:19

This is the one piece that council at this point has choices about.

Sid Tobias2:10:34

Just a bit of a help in breaking down.

Sid Tobias2:10:36

So when we talk about recreation class, are we talking about um like Fort Victoria?

Sid Tobias2:10:43

Is that considered like an RV park that would be a recreation class and just noting we we're at six percent highlands is at 7.1 and for uh the normal business class that covers just what everything else like a thrifty foods or a quality foods or anything else that we've got going and then of course the residences depending on strata or or freehold and whatnot yeah exactly and we're we're gonna delve into that even more absolutely all good?

Sid Tobias2:11:25

So you got clash six, and um that's four point three right now, right?

Sid Tobias2:11:29

What's sorry, what is um uh class five right now.

Speaker_042:11:47

Class five is that three point nine six two.

Speaker_042:11:51

That's what it was in twenty twenty-two.

Speaker_042:11:53

Okay, thanks.

Speaker_042:11:58

I do have more of these numbers coming up.

Sid Tobias2:12:00

Yeah, okay, great.

Damon Christenson2:12:02

Okay.

Speaker_Unknown2:12:03

Thanks.

Damon Christenson2:12:03

Carry on?

Damon Christenson2:12:04

All right.

Damon Christenson2:12:07

So let's look at our residential class properties.

Damon Christenson2:12:13

We we're talking to talk a little bit about the average residential property, which as stated before really isn't a perfect tool, but it does have some bearing most, you know, more in the residential class than in some of the other classes.

Damon Christenson2:12:29

I do draw your attention to the column labeled there 2023 count.

Damon Christenson2:12:34

Keep in mind that that represents the occurrence of a residential property, not the number of individual household units, that counts as one.

Damon Christenson2:12:51

Whereas each individual strata property, each individual strata is counted as one.

Damon Christenson2:12:59

So it just that it just depends on the the underlying nature of the residential property.

Damon Christenson2:13:09

So the sing the average single family residential property value increased from just over a million in 2022 to nearly 1.147 million in 2023.

Damon Christenson2:13:24

It's an increase of 11%.

Damon Christenson2:13:26

That increase, by the way, in 2022 was a 28% increase.

Damon Christenson2:13:31

So while 11% is, I would consider fairly significant, it's still not as much as we saw last year.

Damon Christenson2:13:38

The average residential strata property increased by 18%.

Damon Christenson2:13:43

It was 17% in 2022, was the increase from 2021.

Damon Christenson2:13:49

And that increased from 583 to 685,000.

Damon Christenson2:13:53

Overall, the average residential class assessment value increased by 12%.

Damon Christenson2:13:58

And because we can only have one rate for residential class, we will be using that 12% to measure or evaluate or predict how a change in tax rates will affect all other residential properties.

Damon Christenson2:14:14

Okay.

Sid Tobias2:14:18

John, I do have a bit of a question.

Sid Tobias2:14:21

Um we tax an apartment building, we're just really taxing the building and the land.

Sid Tobias2:14:31

There is there a business tax associated with it.

Sid Tobias2:14:35

It's just simply the building's value plus the land's value and whatever percent, or is there a business is that considered a business as well?

Damon Christenson2:14:44

The class assignment to properties is determined by BC assessment, and they do base it on actual use.

Damon Christenson2:14:53

So while certainly a single property may have, you know, if you're thinking about uh a building where there's you know four stories of residential and two stories of commercial, that would be a good example of a split assessment where a portion of it is is allocated residential and a portion is is business.

Damon Christenson2:15:13

So it is based on actual use, and BC assessment makes that determination.

Damon Christenson2:15:17

If there's nothing going on there but residential, then absolutely land and improvements would be 100% residential.

Sid Tobias2:15:24

And it's just my observation that we uh previous council has approved a number of very large apartment complexes that we're really just getting building and land value back for.

Sid Tobias2:15:39

Is have we advanced any thought on um cost of servicing for a property over time?

Sid Tobias2:15:49

Uh, meaning that the cost of policing, sewer um is that wrapped up in anything that you've been ever exposed to.

Damon Christenson2:16:01

Short answer no.

Damon Christenson2:16:03

I am not aware of in-depth studies that we have uh done here.

Damon Christenson2:16:10

I stand to be corrected, um, you know, that says, you know, a certain building of a certain size.

Damon Christenson2:16:17

Uh I think that's in part what your DCC bylaw does.

Damon Christenson2:16:22

Is it it's it looks at future growth and if and evaluates what additional infrastructure is going to be required in order to service that density.

Damon Christenson2:16:32

Um, but but that's not very n necessarily granular to a specific development, I I would argue.

Sid Tobias2:16:41

Thanks, Todd.

Sid Tobias2:16:41

Just a question.

Damon Christenson2:16:42

Okay.

Damon Christenson2:16:43

So the chart that you see in front of you is I I think quite interesting.

Damon Christenson2:16:49

Uh don't accuse me of having a misleading chart.

Damon Christenson2:16:53

This is not all of the property assessments in the residential class, because if I did that, what you would see is a tail going off to the right side of the chart a lot further.

Damon Christenson2:17:05

So, what I'm what I'm saying is this chart represents the count, so it's a histogram based on the number of properties with values from between zero and 2.2 million, whereas our highest residential property is actually 63 and a half million.

Damon Christenson2:17:24

So you can imagine if you take two 2.2 million and extend this chart over to 63 million, it's a lot.

Damon Christenson2:17:31

But the point of this slide is that you can see the, I think it's a little bit faint in your view there, but there's a gray line in the middle showing you the average residential assessment at just over 1.46 million.

Damon Christenson2:17:46

But 58% of the taxable properties are assessed below that.

Damon Christenson2:17:53

So that's why I always want to make sure that we take that average number in context, saying that the average doesn't mean there's an equal number of properties over and under.

Damon Christenson2:18:08

There are 58% of taxable properties that are less than that average assessment, and 42% are above.

Damon Christenson2:18:17

The median assessment is 984,000.

Damon Christenson2:18:23

Okay.

Damon Christenson2:18:24

We see this even more exaggerated in the business class.

Damon Christenson2:18:29

So of the 123 folios in the business class, 46 of them are actually exempt.

Damon Christenson2:18:35

They are CRD properties, they are parkland.

Damon Christenson2:18:38

So they're exempt from taxes altogether.

Damon Christenson2:18:40

There are 77 properties, so the class just got a lot smaller, right?

Damon Christenson2:18:45

77 properties that actually have taxable assessments, and this chart shows the first bit of a chart where the X axis would need to go to 82 million to show all of the taxable property values.

Damon Christenson2:19:00

Of the 77 properties with taxable assessments, 37 of them or 48% have assessed values under 1 million.

Damon Christenson2:19:11

So almost half of our commercial properties out there have an assessed value of under a million.

Damon Christenson2:19:17

And the remaining properties, remaining 40 properties range between 1 and 82 million.

Damon Christenson2:19:26

So the average value is 2.8, but really that is a very meaningless number.

Damon Christenson2:19:30

It doesn't mean anything.

Damon Christenson2:19:32

What might be a little bit more indicative would be the 11% change, because that's kind of the measure that we can use the 11% change in the average, and that says that overall the class average has changed by 11%.

Damon Christenson2:19:48

Perhaps that might be some measure that against which we can see what our property tax scenarios look like.

Damon Christenson2:19:55

For class 5 and class 8, we don't calculate an average.

Damon Christenson2:20:01

Why?

Damon Christenson2:20:02

Because there are two properties in class 5, and there are two properties in class 8.

Damon Christenson2:20:09

I would argue an average mathematically exists, but that's it.

Damon Christenson2:20:15

We'll be looking at that a little bit later.

Damon Christenson2:20:18

Very quickly, the regional context, what you see in this chart, and it is attached to your report because I know that the numbers are impossible to read on the screens there.

Damon Christenson2:20:29

This is the class six context regionally.

Damon Christenson2:20:35

In this small orange bars, we're seeing each municipality and over five years what the tax multiple for the business class has been for them.

Damon Christenson2:20:49

What we see is that the median for the five year time period for all CRD municipalities is right around 3.53.

Damon Christenson2:20:58

So I think that's an important to keep in mind.

Damon Christenson2:21:00

So it's just roughly about three and a half times the residential rate.

Damon Christenson2:21:04

The provincial multiple that is applied to rural areas and certain other property taxes is 2.45, shown in the faint blue line.

Damon Christenson2:21:13

View Royal's class multiple has been fairly steady, around 3.6.

Damon Christenson2:21:18

It did go up to 4.3 in 2022.

Damon Christenson2:21:22

So that you see in the dark blue bar on the on the right side.

Damon Christenson2:21:26

And in the bottom right corner shows that View Royal is just above middle of the pack with its CRD municipal neighbors for 2022 business class multiples.

Damon Christenson2:21:35

So you see the the yellow bars on the side there, View Royal is kind of smack dab in the middle or just a barely above the middle of that ranking.

Damon Christenson2:21:49

Similar scenario for similar portrayal of the recreation or class 8 multiple because this has been a conversation with council over the last several years.

Damon Christenson2:22:02

Council has directed that the recreation class multiple be increased incrementally little bit by little bit every year, and you can see that you know the view royal the top right section of that chart, you can see that incrementing up from basically 4.11 in 2018 up to six in the CRD is 2022.45, so just about two and a half times the residential rate.

Damon Christenson2:22:39

But we are not aiming to be middle of the pack on this ranking.

Damon Christenson2:22:43

We are aiming, we have in the past, I should say, aimed to be near the ceiling.

Damon Christenson2:22:49

Uh last year, Highlands was at the six mark when six ratio when we were at 5.1, we increased it to six, and Highlands increased it to 7.1.

Damon Christenson2:23:02

So we are second on that list.

Sid Tobias2:23:05

Aside from the RV pack, what other properties might fall into this category?

Damon Christenson2:23:12

If you had Schedule Six in front of you, it lists all of our recreation class eight properties.

Damon Christenson2:23:19

The only other one is on Creed Road that is a golf course.

Damon Christenson2:23:34

The other way we uh look at property taxes is uh across the region is per capita.

Damon Christenson2:23:40

This is a little bit interesting because it takes our population and factors in uh you know what the property taxes are for each uh municipality based on their population.

Damon Christenson2:23:53

Do keep in mind that this does not include water sewer garbage charges.

Damon Christenson2:23:58

It does include property taxes and parcel taxes for municipalities that have parcel taxes.

Damon Christenson2:24:04

So so the water sewer and garbage is done differently in different municipalities, so that's why we've excluded that here.

Damon Christenson2:24:11

The median amount of property taxes per capita over the last five years for the region is $696 per capita.

Damon Christenson2:24:19

In 2022, the taxes per capita in View Royal was $597.

Damon Christenson2:24:25

So that ranks View Royal fourth from lowest in 2022.

Damon Christenson2:24:34

Okay, another brief pause.

Damon Christenson2:24:36

Anything I need to go over there?

Damon Christenson2:24:38

I'm I know that we have dinner coming at 6 o'clock.

Damon Christenson2:24:47

What we're going to get into next is the scenarios and what each means.

Damon Christenson2:24:55

I'm wondering, Chair, if you wish for us to proceed and shorten your dinner time, or would you like to pause and resume after dinner?

Sid Tobias2:25:05

Let's carry on.

Sid Tobias2:25:07

I think we could go until six and five.

John Rogers2:25:12

Yeah, even ten after.

Sid Tobias2:25:13

Yeah.

Damon Christenson2:25:14

Okay.

Damon Christenson2:25:16

I don't have many more slides.

John Rogers2:25:18

That's okay.

Damon Christenson2:25:19

Okay.

Damon Christenson2:25:20

The scenarios.

Damon Christenson2:25:22

So this is we're gonna we're gonna start getting into the meat of it now.

Damon Christenson2:25:26

In order to see what the effect of any change is, we change one thing at a time.

Damon Christenson2:25:31

Okay?

Damon Christenson2:25:32

And that's what these scenarios do.

Damon Christenson2:25:33

That doesn't mean you can only do these scenarios and no other.

Damon Christenson2:25:38

And it also doesn't mean that in some cases we can't do a little bit of this one and a little bit of that one.

Damon Christenson2:25:44

Some of these are not compatible with each other, some of them are.

Damon Christenson2:25:47

Okay?

Damon Christenson2:25:47

So just keep that in mind.

Damon Christenson2:25:49

I I could run scenarios every day, all day, but only one of them is the right one for you, I'm sure.

Damon Christenson2:25:57

We're going to start with scenario A.

Damon Christenson2:25:59

And this is this is one in fact, all of these are the base scenarios that we have presented in prior years.

Damon Christenson2:26:06

So these, you know, for those of you who are returning council members, will be very familiar with these.

Damon Christenson2:26:11

Scenario A basically says do nothing.

Damon Christenson2:26:15

We set the multiples last year.

Damon Christenson2:26:18

We now have a different number being a different amount of dollars that we need to collect in revenue, but we're just going to let the assessment values dictate who pays.

Damon Christenson2:26:33

So if residential assessments increase by a little bit and uh business class assessments increased by some as well, you know, a similar percentage, but other class, other class values, assessment values have decreased or increased.

Damon Christenson2:26:51

What doesn't what doesn't matter?

Damon Christenson2:26:53

It'll be what it is.

Damon Christenson2:26:54

We're going to keep our multiples the same and let the chips fall where they may.

Damon Christenson2:26:58

Okay, so that's what that one is.

Damon Christenson2:27:00

As it turns out, we are we would have to decrease the tax rate itself by one and a half percent to achieve our revenue target in the financial plan.

Damon Christenson2:27:12

We have to decrease the rate because, as it turns out, the assessments increased more than is required for the amount of money we need.

Damon Christenson2:27:23

Clear?

Lindsay Byers2:27:24

Good.

Damon Christenson2:27:26

The next scenario kind of does the opposite.

Damon Christenson2:27:33

Instead of saying, let's let the assessments determine who pays, we are going to say, no, what we really want is for each class to pay proportionately the same amount as they did last year.

Damon Christenson2:27:52

So we talked about the tax burden and how the residential class paid for 72% of the total tax bill, the total tax revenue for View Royal.

Damon Christenson2:28:05

What we want to say is we don't care what the assessments did in the residential or any other class, we want those proportions to stay the same between the classes.

Damon Christenson2:28:15

So residential is going to pay 72%, business class is going to pay 27%, and the other classes are going to pay the percentage of the total revenue that they did last year, regardless of what happened to their assessments.

Damon Christenson2:28:41

Okay, so that's what that scenario does.

Damon Christenson2:28:43

Scenario C and D are very similar, they just affect different classes.

Damon Christenson2:28:49

Scenario C kind of follows along what council has been interested in before, and that is let's purposefully decrease the tax ratio for light industry and business class.

Damon Christenson2:29:05

And and you might argue, you know, this might increase the competitiveness of View Royal against its surrounding municipalities at attracting or retaining the commercial sector.

Damon Christenson2:29:19

So this is about attracting and retaining the commercial sector.

Damon Christenson2:29:24

And by doing this, you will see later that it does shift some of the burden to primarily the residential class.

Damon Christenson2:29:36

However, keep in mind that when you attract new business to your municipality and increase that assessment class, every dollar of assessment in the in class six, the business assessment is worth, you know, three and a half or four times a dollar in residential value.

Damon Christenson2:29:56

So if you grow the class six commercial sector, at some point in time, the the other classes do benefit as well, but down the road.

Damon Christenson2:30:09

Okay.

Damon Christenson2:30:11

Scenario D looks at increasing class eight ratio.

Damon Christenson2:30:14

In this case, I have just guessed from six to seven, it could be 6.1, 6.5, 6.8.

Damon Christenson2:30:23

It could leave it at 6, you know, or or or some other number.

Damon Christenson2:30:28

But because council was interested, has been interested in this in the past, and we have been incrementing it up every year.

Damon Christenson2:30:35

I I needed to show you the impact this year of what that would be to increase the class 8 ratio.

Damon Christenson2:30:43

Keep in mind, I I do caution you for both class 5 and class 8 that any change, especially for class 8, impacts class 8 significantly.

Damon Christenson2:30:57

There's only two properties.

Damon Christenson2:30:59

And really, one property is the significant property.

Damon Christenson2:31:06

The other one is a much lower assessment value.

Damon Christenson2:31:08

So you're really targeting one property.

Damon Christenson2:31:11

And let's say the scenario that we're we're talking about increases the tax amount that they pay by, let's say $10,000.

Damon Christenson2:31:21

That $10,000 that we're going to get more from that class eight gets spread amongst the $10 million dollars that we get from all of the other classes.

Damon Christenson2:31:34

Who do you think is going to feel it the most?

Damon Christenson2:31:37

It's going to be that class eight, and the rest of them are not going to notice all that much.

Damon Christenson2:31:43

Which is why my advice would be that if you are to increment this, we do it in small increments.

Damon Christenson2:31:54

Now I can give you a slide with less numbers.

Damon Christenson2:32:00

If you want to see the numbers that correspond to this slide, you can look at schedule five because this is really just a graphical representative representation of schedule five.

Damon Christenson2:32:13

And what it says is that it's it's really just basically, you know, this is this is a sum zero game.

Damon Christenson2:32:24

If you change one thing, you're gonna be affecting the rest in some way or another, right?

Damon Christenson2:32:31

If we look at the total residential, on schedule five, you can see that between scenario B and scenario D, the increase on uh on a $100,000 uh one hundred thousand dollars worth of assessment that in 2023 is a hundred and twelve dollars, $112,000, so that's a 12% increase.

Damon Christenson2:33:02

Scenario B and Dre they're the same, $20 per 100 increase.

Damon Christenson2:33:10

So between B and D, the residential class doesn't care which you choose because the impact is the same.

Damon Christenson2:33:20

Scenario A is a $21 per $100,000 increase.

Damon Christenson2:33:26

So it's not bad, it's just not as good as B or D.

Damon Christenson2:33:32

Scenario C is a $25 per $100,000 increase.

Damon Christenson2:33:37

And that's why scenario C is not the popular scenario for the residential class.

Damon Christenson2:33:43

And it does make sense because remember, scenario C was the one where we were reducing the multiple to the business class.

Damon Christenson2:33:51

So if the business class pays less, who's gonna pay more?

Damon Christenson2:33:56

It's gonna be the residential class.

Damon Christenson2:33:58

So that's what's happening there.

Damon Christenson2:34:01

When we look at the business class, the rate per $100,000 for scenario C, so that's the one that they're going to prefer, is $25 per $100,000.

Damon Christenson2:34:19

That is quite a bit less than either scenario A or D.

Damon Christenson2:34:28

Scenario A, it's $74 or almost three times as much in scenario A and $72 in scenario D.

Damon Christenson2:34:39

So you can see that adjusting the multiples affects the smaller, the smaller the class, the greater the impact when you start messing with the multiples.

Damon Christenson2:34:50

And it's a lesser of an impact to the class that has the most assessment, the residential class.

Damon Christenson2:34:55

So it does, it is a greater benefit to the business class to reduce the multiple.

Damon Christenson2:35:03

And yes, the residential class picks up the tab, but the impact is less because they are a bigger class and more assessments to spread that bump over.

Damon Christenson2:35:14

Right?

Damon Christenson2:35:15

And in scenario B for the business class, it's an eighty-six dollar per hundred.

Damon Christenson2:35:21

So they scenario B isn't would not be the one your your commercial sector would be asking for.

Damon Christenson2:35:36

You asked about multiples earlier.

Damon Christenson2:35:39

This slide shows the multiples in red that are different from the prior year.

Damon Christenson2:35:44

So the top row across the top 22 2022 multiple for light industry was that 3.9.

Damon Christenson2:35:51

It was 4.3 for business and six for recreation.

Damon Christenson2:35:54

Scenario A keeps those multiples the same and says let the assessments shift the burden wherever it needs to go.

Damon Christenson2:36:02

Scenario B says no, we're going to change the multiples so that we achieve the same proportion of dollars from each class.

Damon Christenson2:36:15

And so you can see that the multiples are making that change, and they do actually increase the business multiple and the light industry multiple.

Damon Christenson2:36:28

And it would reduce the recreation multiple because there was an increase of assessments there.

Damon Christenson2:36:34

Scenario C arbitrarily says we're going to manipulate directly the multiple for business and light industry and change it to 3.7 and 4.0.

Damon Christenson2:36:44

There could be some other number that counsel may prefer.

Damon Christenson2:36:47

Those are the numbers that I picked.

Damon Christenson2:36:49

But you can, you know, you can kind of judge whether that would be more or less, depending on if the number is bigger or smaller.

Damon Christenson2:36:55

And then scenario D says we're going to take the leave all of the other multiples the same and increase the recreation multiple to seven.

Damon Christenson2:37:07

So what does that mean for the oh I I'm I see a question chair.

Gery Lemon2:37:13

So Don on that last um scenario, if we increase the recreation to seven.

Gery Lemon2:37:27

So how would that affect residential?

Damon Christenson2:37:35

How that affects residential is I'm gonna say not all that much.

Damon Christenson2:37:41

So if I go to to schedule five, schedule so the the basically the residential class is indifferent between B, scenario B and D being twenty dollars per hundred thousand of assessment.

Damon Christenson2:38:01

It's the same for scenario B and for scenario D.

Damon Christenson2:38:05

And that's because the the there's the you know that that impact it is spread, um it doesn't really benefit the residential class enough.

Damon Christenson2:38:16

It's spread over such a large class.

John Rogers2:38:20

Okay.

Gery Lemon2:38:22

If I may, and and I know and tell me if I'm holding things up here, but I think you probably alarmed us all at the very beginning when you said So we're gonna have to actually go to over 10%, which is not what we want.

Gery Lemon2:38:39

So I guess my question is ultimately if we increase recreation to the seven level, is there it is it possible for us to keep the residential down below 10%?

Damon Christenson2:39:00

So when I mentioned the 10%, that was the bottom line difference in total tax revenue from 2022 to 2023, not specifically for any class.

Damon Christenson2:39:14

So if I get through the next couple of slides, I'm hoping, I'm hoping that your question is is answered.

Damon Christenson2:39:24

Was there another question?

Damon Christenson2:39:26

Nope.

Damon Christenson2:39:26

Okay.

John Rogers2:39:27

Oh, Don's got a question now.

Don Brown2:39:29

So if we go with the the green fees are going to go up with Highland Pacific, basically.

Damon Christenson2:39:35

Well, I certainly can't predict that.

Sid Tobias2:39:37

No, I don't.

Damon Christenson2:39:41

Okay.

Damon Christenson2:39:42

So BC Assessment actually provides this lovely little graphic that will help us understand how to determine what's going to happen to me in my property, depending on whether or not my assessment went up more than the average.

Damon Christenson2:40:00

And here's where the average kind of comes comes into play.

Damon Christenson2:40:04

So if the so the residential class average assessment increased 12%, we saw that earlier.

Damon Christenson2:40:13

So if my property's assessment changed from 2022 more than that 12%, if my change was greater than 12%, then I can expect to pay more than the scenario is predicting.

Damon Christenson2:40:30

And vice versa, if it's less, then I can expect the impact to be less.

Damon Christenson2:40:36

I have an actual math to show you this.

Damon Christenson2:40:40

I'll walk it through.

Damon Christenson2:40:41

I know it's numbers.

Damon Christenson2:40:43

So if the average property, and and actually, if you were to look at schedule six, this plays out in the numbers on schedule six on the first couple of rows there on schedule six, where we where we get these numbers from.

Damon Christenson2:40:57

If the average property assessment increased 12%, but the single family residential increase, so if if your home increased only 11% and not 12%, that's a difference of 1%.

Damon Christenson2:41:12

And scenario, if scenario A predicts for the average property a 10% increase, paying 200,000, not 200,000, 200, then you can actually reduce that 10% by the 1% that uh is that the average property, the the single family residential increase was less than the average overall, and the increase then would be $189, not 200.

Damon Christenson2:41:43

And for the strata residential assessment, the increase to strata residential was 18%.

Damon Christenson2:41:51

And so that's a 6% increase over and above the prediction of the 12% average overall for the residential class.

Damon Christenson2:42:00

Scenario A predicts for the average residential property a 10% increase, where the strata residential is estimated increase would be 16% or 10 plus 6%.

Damon Christenson2:42:13

Now I know that $183 is not 16% compared to the 10% on 200, but that's because the average assessment for a strata property is much less than the average for the residential class.

Damon Christenson2:42:32

When you look at schedule six, and of course, I'm I can't I can't show you schedule six on the screen because it is it would just be too much numbers in too small the space, you wouldn't be able to read it.

Damon Christenson2:42:45

But I'm hoping that you can pull it up on your device or that you have a printout.

Damon Christenson2:42:49

Because we can see there, you can go through and you can actually see this playing out.

Damon Christenson2:42:55

What we have done, what we provide in Schedule 6 is real concrete examples of what will happen to those, these are actual numbers for what would happen in each of the scenarios A, B, C, and D.

Damon Christenson2:43:10

And you can you can look at you know the impact of changing the recreation class multiple to seven, for example, for 127 Burnett Road, would translate to a $49,600 increase for that would be significant.

Damon Christenson2:43:36

Now, one of the reasons why that uh is is greater than what we've seen in some past years is because if you look at the assessment for that property, the 20 the assessment increase was 40 percent.

Damon Christenson2:43:54

So this is exactly exacerbated in a year when the I can't tell you why the assessment increase, that's BC assessment's job.

Damon Christenson2:44:04

I I I don't know.

Damon Christenson2:44:05

I don't know why that's happening.

Damon Christenson2:44:07

I might argue that this may not be the year to take a drastic measure to increase the recreation class multiple.

Damon Christenson2:44:18

Maybe you want to increase it something, but even if we um if we scenario A, where none of the multiples change, the increase to that property is 31,000.

Damon Christenson2:44:34

Okay, I just leave that for your for your thought.

Damon Christenson2:44:39

You can see that in so what we try to do in both the residential class section of that schedule and the business class, class six section of that schedule, is we we take the best and the worst.

Damon Christenson2:44:54

So we run the scenarios and we say, so what what you will see on here, now I can't do the best and the worst of each scenarios because there's some of those are in conflict and I I can't give you all of the properties, but um certainly you know you will you will find Eagle Creek on this list.

Damon Christenson2:45:13

Okay, with a 5% increase in assessment.

Damon Christenson2:45:18

Scenario A predicts a 3% increase in in taxation.

Damon Christenson2:45:23

Scenario A.

Damon Christenson2:45:25

That would be a decrease in taxation if we were to choose scenario C and actually reduce the multiple.

Damon Christenson2:45:32

Okay.

Damon Christenson2:45:33

For the residential class, I'm gonna pick the one that had a reduction in assessment, 16% 1950 West Park Lane.

Damon Christenson2:45:42

That was likely, I'm gonna guess, due to um potentially a subdivision.

Damon Christenson2:45:49

Um so the assessments decrease 16%.

Damon Christenson2:45:52

They will under scenario A be paying 18% less, and under scenario C 16% less.

Damon Christenson2:45:59

So they get a reduction.

Damon Christenson2:46:10

I don't know why.

Damon Christenson2:46:12

I can't tell you why.

Damon Christenson2:46:14

That will be a nearly $15,000 increase in taxes, or it's 85%.

Damon Christenson2:46:20

But by and large, you know, when we look at a property that is closer to our 12%, there's one that had a 15% increase in assessment.

Damon Christenson2:46:35

They're going to see a nearly 13% increase under scenario A.

Damon Christenson2:46:39

But by and large, I think if people, you know, people understand that when their assessments go up, they're going to be paying more.

Damon Christenson2:46:47

In this case, the percentage increase is going to be relative to the assessment increase.

John Rogers2:46:57

So do you have your magic spreadsheet around so that we could try out different numbers?

Damon Christenson2:47:06

Sorry, typically what has happened in the past is if council wishes for me during the dinner break to run a couple of other scenarios, I would I do my best to do that on the fly with a proviso that you understand if I have to confess later on that I find an error.

Damon Christenson2:47:23

It worked last last year um and and certainly I would be happy to do that for council.

John Rogers2:47:28

So I've got one for you.

Damon Christenson2:47:29

All right so um uh five would go from uh 3.96 to 3.1 oh sorry three point sorry three point um no five should go yeah 3.9 so let's take five to three point nine six to four point one eight to six point one what would that do so I would yeah your your scenario is going to be yeah it it's gonna be a little bit of a little bit of scenario C and just a little bit of scenario D and you know certainly a combination of you know C and D.

Damon Christenson2:47:30

All right.

John Rogers2:48:24

Yeah let's see what happens.

Damon Christenson2:48:26

Yeah uh certainly I can do that.

Damon Christenson2:48:28

I I don't know that it's going to significantly affect the residential experience.

Damon Christenson2:48:37

Um be but but certainly I'm I'm I'm happy to run those numbers if that's council's wish.

Sid Tobias2:48:43

Yeah I think what I'd like to do is recess for um dinner because it's here and it's warm and we're 15 minutes over for that.

Sid Tobias2:48:51

But I'd like um council's input on when we should return.

Sid Tobias2:48:55

So folks potentially watching from home could queue back in.

Sid Tobias2:48:59

Do we want half hour for uh dinner?

Sid Tobias2:49:01

Is that reasonable?

Sid Tobias2:49:02

Quarter to quarter to uh seven.

Sid Tobias2:49:05

Is that good?

Sid Tobias2:49:06

Uh so can I get a motion to adjourn, please?

Sid Tobias2:49:10

Second.

Sid Tobias2:49:11

Uh none opposed.

Sid Tobias2:49:12

Uh so we'll adjourn now from uh this time until zero eighteen forty-five.

Sid Tobias2:49:22

Thank you and uh welcome back, folks.

Sid Tobias2:49:25

We're just um calling the meeting back to order after a um supper break, and we were at um tax rate options, which is item six three three um E1.

Sid Tobias2:49:49

And we just heard most of a report from our director of finance, and she had some questions.

Sid Tobias2:49:56

Uh we was there more of a report.

Sid Tobias2:50:03

We're at the choices.

Sid Tobias2:50:05

We had gone through the majority of it, and we're down to options.

Sid Tobias2:50:08

Go ahead, Doc.

Damon Christenson2:50:11

Thank you very much, Mayor Tobias.

Damon Christenson2:50:13

So um I quickly threw up the scenario in in the shortest amount of time possible.

Damon Christenson2:50:22

And uh Ivan is going to uh have that up have it up there in a moment.

Damon Christenson2:50:28

I've also distributed a couple of sheets that replace your schedule five and schedule six so that we can see the effect of the suggested scenario.

Damon Christenson2:50:45

So what the scenario as I understood it proposed, and I've you see on your on on the screen in council chambers here and for the viewing public at home, um scenario E, a new scenario.

Damon Christenson2:51:01

Oh thanks.

Damon Christenson2:51:03

And uh so what we've chosen to manipulate is the ratios or the multiples for class five light industry, class six business, and class eight recreation.

Damon Christenson2:51:19

And the suggestion that was that we look and see what happens to all the other classes when we change those ratios to 3.1 for the light industry, which in 2022 was 3.9, so that's a reduction.

Damon Christenson2:51:35

4.1 for the business class, which in 2022 was 4.3, so that is a slight reduction.

Damon Christenson2:51:44

And a and a increase, a slight increase to recreation from six to six point one.

Damon Christenson2:51:53

Did I get it right?

John Rogers2:51:55

No.

John Rogers2:51:56

Oh, I didn't.

John Rogers2:51:57

No, I think it was my mistake because um on the light industry number five, the first column, um, I actually should have said 3.9, not 3.1.

John Rogers2:52:08

Okay, so in in other words, it's okay.

John Rogers2:52:11

Yeah, I heard 3.1.

John Rogers2:52:12

I know.

Damon Christenson2:52:13

My apologies.

John Rogers2:52:14

Yeah, so uh that's the way it goes.

Damon Christenson2:52:16

Okay.

Damon Christenson2:52:17

So I think that that is I think that what we can do in that case is is take the results that you see in schedule five and six as being approximate.

Damon Christenson2:52:30

Because, you know, while that will significantly make a difference to light industry, I think we could use as a proxy schedule A, uh, sorry, scenario A for that, because scenario A 3.9, pretty close to what it was in 2022.

Lindsay Byers2:52:51

Right?

Lindsay Byers2:52:52

Okay.

Damon Christenson2:52:52

So you're suggesting a very small decrease for light industry from 3.962 to 3.9.

Damon Christenson2:52:59

So essentially scenario A or very close to that.

John Rogers2:53:03

Yeah.

Damon Christenson2:53:04

Right?

Damon Christenson2:53:05

So that's what so on schedule five and schedule six, we'll be looking at scenario A for those numbers.

Damon Christenson2:53:10

For class six, to go from 4.3 in the business class to 4.1 is a slight decrease.

Damon Christenson2:53:19

It's it's you know, but that certainly is our second biggest class, is the business class, so there might be the greater impact there, and for recreation to go from six to six point one certainly will affect.

Damon Christenson2:53:33

Um, as we saw earlier, that the recreation class had a that one property had a very significant increase, and we can see what happens to that.

Damon Christenson2:53:43

So, what I handed out for you, schedule five, if you look at the rightmost column, I think I might point out that in this case, and and this does assume that the light industry class goes to 3.1, so the effect will be a little bit different from this, but probably not significantly.

Damon Christenson2:54:04

The rate per hundred thousand for the residential class would go to twenty-four dollars, and in scenario A, that is the you know, kind of baseline scenario, it was twenty-one.

Damon Christenson2:54:19

So that's a three dollar per hundred thousand dollar increase, more or less.

Damon Christenson2:54:26

Um so we're we're going to kind of ignore the light industry, you know, class at this point because we know that that wasn't what you intended, and my apologies for that.

Alison MacKenzie2:54:35

Yeah.

Damon Christenson2:54:36

So we can see then that the business class, which in our base scenario would see $74 per 100,000 coming from the business class, it's.

Damon Christenson2:54:47

It's almost halved to $42 in scenario E.

Damon Christenson2:54:52

So that that does actually affect the business class somewhat.

Damon Christenson2:54:58

You know, it it does feel a little bit like a halfway measure between all of our scenarios.

Damon Christenson2:55:04

Class B saw an $86 per $100,000 for the business class.

Damon Christenson2:55:14

And in the recreation class eight, you can see a increase of $335 per $100,000.

Damon Christenson2:55:23

But really for that one, what we should be looking at is schedule six.

Damon Christenson2:55:27

So if you look at schedule six, you'll see a new column on the right side of that.

Damon Christenson2:55:32

That's the really big sheet.

Damon Christenson2:55:35

You can see scenario E there.

Damon Christenson2:55:38

And you can see what the impact is to the residential class.

Damon Christenson2:55:43

So for a single family residence, the that you know is the average amount that increased 11%, that in scenario A would have a 9% tax increase of $189, it would see that go to $218 or 10.6%.

Damon Christenson2:56:08

And for the strata property that whose assessed value increased 18%, and in scenario A would pay about 16% more of or $183, they're gonna go up to $200 in this scenario E.

Damon Christenson2:56:27

You're following?

Damon Christenson2:56:28

Yeah.

Damon Christenson2:56:29

And so on and so forth down the residential class, how that affected the business class was if we go to which one should we pick?

Damon Christenson2:56:39

Let's get pick uh one Adams Place that had a 9% assessment value increase.

Damon Christenson2:56:45

In scenario A had a 7% increase in taxation, and that would be reduced, so that would be less in scenario E at 3.700 versus 78.

Damon Christenson2:57:02

So it does benefit the business class for certain.

Damon Christenson2:57:05

And this kind of goes along with what what I've been saying.

Damon Christenson2:57:07

And the principle is that the smaller classes are greatly impacted when we reduce or increase the multiples.

Damon Christenson2:57:15

When we start messing with the multiples for the the classes that have the lesser assessment, the impact is felt by them either way, up or down and less so by the residential class.

Damon Christenson2:57:26

But it does affect the residential class because the it's a sum zero game.

Damon Christenson2:57:32

Something's going to shift.

Damon Christenson2:57:35

And you can see that in class eight the impact to a 40% increase in assessment actually results in about 42% increase in taxes under scenario E, whereas it was a 38% increase in scenario A.

Don Brown2:57:59

Thoughts or questions, folks?

Sid Tobias2:58:02

The objective at the end of this, because Don needs to set this in stone in a bylaw, is to come up with either hold the same or make an adjustment that we can all agree on.

Sid Tobias2:58:14

And I'm just going to suggest my own personal views on this is that I don't think we're broken right now by the distribution of this.

Sid Tobias2:58:23

And people are experiencing an extraordinary tough time with assessments across the board.

Sid Tobias2:58:31

Some of them have gone up considerably.

Sid Tobias2:58:33

So just to factor in in our deliberations that it's okay to keep things the same this year and uh potentially track on something next year as well.

Sid Tobias2:58:46

Um, but everything's going to have a consequence.

Sid Tobias2:58:48

Counselor McKenzie.

Alison MacKenzie2:58:51

Yes.

Alison MacKenzie2:58:52

Um so I think my general thoughts on this, and I haven't chosen a specific scenario, but um I would like to choose one that is favorable to residents for the reasons um Mayor Tobias mentioned, and also to businesses, because we really want to attract uh new business to View Royal to keep up with the number of growing population that we have, we need services.

Alison MacKenzie2:59:16

So um, in my mind, class eight uh would be where I would uh uh think about an increase uh due to the fact that they can more easily recoup the increase uh through user fee.

Alison MacKenzie2:59:31

And uh we have to remember that one of the largest um out of the two there, the the larger one does have a number of uh residents uh there so it could be dispersed among amongst them and probably not impact an individual so significantly.

Sid Tobias2:59:51

Thank you, Councillor McKenzie.

Sid Tobias2:59:53

Any other comments?

Sid Tobias2:59:54

Councillor Brown.

Don Brown2:59:55

Yeah, I like um scenario A would be my preference.

Don Brown3:00:00

Uh and I also like um john's uh suggestion.

Don Brown3:00:04

So that would be my second choice, would be the E the hybrid one.

Sid Tobias3:00:09

I'm gonna go to Councillor Madsen joining us online.

John Rogers3:00:14

Yes, thank you sorry for being late uh travel issues etc but uh yeah no uh scenario a uh i is where i would uh is what i support okay counselor rogers please yeah scenario scenario a with a business uh going to uh four point uh what is it four point one so i i think the point with uh with businesses as um uh already mentioned is uh uh they're um also really uh struggling with inflation, perhaps more so because it's not only inflation, it's um um i there are many other factors involved.

John Rogers3:00:59

They've got um um uh continual wage increases, even staff shortages.

John Rogers3:01:05

Um so uh the more that we can help our local businesses uh um even in in the smallest uh amount uh start bringing that down from the high of 4.3, bring it down to 4.1 is a symbolic uh uh way, I suppose, but it um does signal to our businesses that um we recognize where they're coming from.

John Rogers3:01:24

And I think when you look at the last uh column per capita, you know, us being the third from the bottom, we've got room to move up.

Sid Tobias3:01:40

Thank you, Councillor Rogers.

Sid Tobias3:01:42

Other comments?

Sid Tobias3:01:42

Councilor Clemon.

Gery Lemon3:01:44

Um, I excuse me, I I agree.

Gery Lemon3:01:47

Um scenario A.

Gery Lemon3:01:50

Um I think is is um it's well we're holding our own, we're holding the line.

Gery Lemon3:01:59

Um, as you said, it's not broke.

Gery Lemon3:02:01

And I think you know it uh certainly being most sympathetic to residents and and businesses is um during particularly trying trying times is um paramount to keep and take in consideration.

Sid Tobias3:02:19

Other thoughts?

Sid Tobias3:02:21

I think the the general consensus here is I'm hearing some sort of modification to scenario A.

Sid Tobias3:02:27

Um that's more favorable for businesses, just testing the waters with colleagues here.

Sid Tobias3:02:29

Um 4.1 for businesses that would change from uh the current 4.3, and that would be the only change as a modification of scenario A.

Sid Tobias3:02:45

And I'll look to you, Councilor Rogers, if that was in your mind.

John Rogers3:02:50

Um I I maybe um we can get some direction from staff if um would you be able to show us what that looks like and um for our consideration by the time it comes to council?

Sid Tobias3:03:02

Um councillor Mattson has his hand up as well.

Sid Tobias3:03:08

So that was a question.

Ron Mattson3:03:09

Well, I'm sorry, we if you like scenario A changes a fair amount if you drop it to 4.1, because it's going to basically have to go somewhere and go on to residential.

Ron Mattson3:03:24

So I I don't support uh scenario A with a 4.1.

Ron Mattson3:03:30

I support it as it is.

Ron Mattson3:03:32

Otherwise, we're going to increase the residential.

Sid Tobias3:03:36

Thank you, Counselor Matson.

Sid Tobias3:03:38

Do we want staff to go away?

Sid Tobias3:03:40

I think we should probably call a question on scenario A, is where we're heading for right now.

Sid Tobias3:03:46

So I can I get a a motion right now or an alternative session.

Ron Mattson3:03:51

I'll move the current scenario A.

Ron Mattson3:03:53

Second.

Sid Tobias3:03:55

So moved by Councillor Mattson, seconded by counselor Lemon.

Sid Tobias3:03:59

Any other further discussion on scenario A and Councilor Matson would you like to motivate on that uh just as I said before any if we change the business rate it then has to go to the residential rate.

Ron Mattson3:04:20

So I don't support it for that reason.

Ron Mattson3:04:22

So I that's why I support keeping it as it is scenario A.

Speaker_043:04:27

Thank you Counselor Matson Councilor Lemon.

Sid Tobias3:04:35

Thank you Counselor Roger.

John Rogers3:04:37

Yes, thank you so um there are the two graphs.

John Rogers3:04:40

There is the the the graph that shows is business class six, uh we're we're in the middle, and it shows us in the per capita, the last page, you know, which shows us at the bottom.

John Rogers3:04:49

And I I think um, you know, it's the businesses that we need to motivate to to come into the interview wall and and uh help continue to take that significant portion of tax load um uh you know off the residents.

John Rogers3:05:05

When you look at this, you know, we're going to lose uh keep uh light industry five as is.

John Rogers3:05:11

Um we've already got the recreational uh pretty high.

John Rogers3:05:15

The mini it's a minimal impact to the residents is by appreciating and respecting our businesses and making sure that they stay and not move.

John Rogers3:05:24

Uh I think of it the example of uh you know how much we how hard we work to keep Kenya entire in in our community.

John Rogers3:05:29

So that's my rationale.

Sid Tobias3:05:35

Thank you, Councillor Rogers.

Sid Tobias3:05:37

Other questions, Councilor McKinsey?

Alison MacKenzie3:05:40

Um so Don, would it be possible to offset the um a reduction for a business with the recreation one, or does it necessarily fall onto residence?

Damon Christenson3:05:55

Through the chair, simply by virtue of the sheer volume of residential assessments versus the relatively small uh asset you know, as a total class in the recreation assessments, it's going to primarily be picked uh, you know, the the effect is that the residential assessment will will pick it up so um I think we should call the question maybe on scenario A and I think it's um when you've got too many variables going around like such a dramatic increase in property assessments and then we're creating another variable by injecting um a different balance on how we're distributing our taxes.

Sid Tobias3:06:43

It's never been my experience that when you've got two unknowns that you come up with something positive.

Sid Tobias3:06:49

Meaning that maybe it's okay if we don't change um you know the the ratio uh for uh the rates for this year.

Sid Tobias3:06:59

We allow BC assessment to be the bad guy, which uh I don't think anybody is cheering over the assessments considering their taxes that they've got to pay, and give us some time to consider uh with their strategic planning what we'd like to do uh for for businesses.

Sid Tobias3:07:15

So uh we've got a motion on the table now for scenario A.

Sid Tobias3:07:20

Uh, so I'd like to call a question.

Sid Tobias3:07:22

Uh, all those in favor of scenario A.

Sid Tobias3:07:25

Um, and all those opposed to scenario A.

Sid Tobias3:07:30

And I see one, and that's councillor Rogers.

Sid Tobias3:07:33

So scenario A passes for the 2023 tax rate options.

Sid Tobias3:07:38

And I think, Don, that gives you the ammunition that you need to go away and to come back with a bylaw for our next meeting so we can implement the taxed rates.

Sid Tobias3:07:44

Thank you very much.

Sid Tobias3:07:51

Cheers, Don.

Sid Tobias3:07:52

And uh Kim, I think it's over to you for an update, sir.

Kim Anema3:07:58

Thank you, Mayor Tobias.

Kim Anema3:08:00

The uh CA report is for information.

Kim Anema3:08:02

Um if you have questions, the team is here to respond to anything you might ask.

Kim Anema3:08:08

Otherwise, a a motion to receive the report would be in order.

Sid Tobias3:08:14

So in favor?

John Rogers3:08:19

Did I just make a comment?

John Rogers3:08:21

Uh yes, now that it's on the table.

John Rogers3:08:23

Yeah.

John Rogers3:08:24

Uh thank you very much.

John Rogers3:08:25

I really appreciate the the aerial photo of the Helmaken um pump station there.

John Rogers3:08:29

Uh it really is quite an achievement and congratulations to staff.

John Rogers3:08:35

A very long uh time coming, but uh huge accomplishment.

John Rogers3:08:39

Well done.

Ivan Leung3:08:40

Thank you for that.

Ivan Leung3:08:41

I'll pass that on.

Gery Lemon3:08:44

Thank you.

Sid Tobias3:08:45

Well uh councillor Lemon.

Gery Lemon3:08:47

Yeah, and I just want to um acknowledge the extraordinary speed which the the uh porta potties graffiti and tagging was kept covered up.

Gery Lemon3:08:58

That's like 24 hour turn out turnaround or or less.

Gery Lemon3:09:03

So thank you.

Sid Tobias3:09:07

No other comments, so called the questions on receiving the CAO staff report for information.

Sid Tobias3:09:12

All in favor?

Sid Tobias3:09:13

Looking at you two, Councillor Ratson.

Sid Tobias3:09:15

None opposed.

Sid Tobias3:09:19

Um thank you very much, Kim.

Sid Tobias3:09:23

And I think that uh brings us down to Parkerson Rack.

Sid Tobias3:10:01

Oh, I think that brings us down to correspondence number seven in the agenda.

Sid Tobias3:10:06

Moving eight and uh moving receipts of all correspondence.

Sid Tobias3:10:12

Second.

Sid Tobias3:10:13

Counselor Brown, all in favor.

Sid Tobias3:10:17

None opposed.

Sid Tobias3:10:19

Um, so we have pulled everything in for correspondence.

Sid Tobias3:10:26

And we had a closed meeting resolution, but that was just a motion to recess, right?

Sid Tobias3:10:34

So we're okay to keep going now.

Sid Tobias3:10:38

And we've already reconvened.

Sid Tobias3:10:41

So we've got two petitions and delegations.

Sid Tobias3:10:45

One is from BC Transit, who joins us tonight to talk about the island highway rapid transit.

Lindsay Byers3:11:13

Thank you for having us.

Lindsay Byers3:11:14

My name is Lindsay Byers.

Lindsay Byers3:11:16

I am the senior manager of Government Relations for Victoria.

Lindsay Byers3:11:20

I am joined by my colleagues, James Wadsworth here, and Alivi Megan Beer, and uh they are with scheduling and planning, and we are going to give you a quick presentation on the Rapid Bus West Shore Line infrastructure.

Lindsay Byers3:11:33

And so we will go ahead and get started.

Lindsay Byers3:11:37

So quickly, the objective is to provide an update on the implementation and planning activities to advance Rapid Bus the implementation strategy.

Lindsay Byers3:11:45

We'll give you a quick regional context, Rapid Bus update, transit service planning, transit infrastructure, and the next steps for the project.

Lindsay Byers3:11:54

So I will hand it over to Levi now.

Levi Megenbir3:11:58

Excellent.

Levi Megenbir3:11:58

Thanks, Lindsay, and thanks to Council for having us here today.

Levi Megenbir3:12:02

Before I dive into speaking about Rapid Bus, I just want to provide a brief overview and some context.

Levi Megenbir3:12:07

So, as we all know, the Victoria region is growing very rapidly and as anticipated to continue its uh dramatic increase in population in the coming years.

Levi Megenbir3:12:16

Um, between 2019 and 2028, we're anticipating an 11% increase in population for the whole region, with approximately double that happening within the in the West Shore area at about a 22% increase.

Levi Megenbir3:12:29

So, obviously, that's going to create a lot of pressure on our constrained road networks, uh, particularly between the West Shore and downtown, and that creates a really strong business case for us to continue investing in in transit, uh, rapid transit in particular between the West Shore and downtown area.

Levi Megenbir3:12:45

Next slide.

Levi Megenbir3:12:48

From a strategic planning perspective, we originally defined what Rapid Bus was and how we envisioned it within the Victoria region in the 2011 Transit Future Plan.

Levi Megenbir3:12:58

So that plan really envisioned what the network could look like in 25 years, and it set the baseline and foundation that we've built upon since then while we've been looking at rolling Rapid Bus out across the region.

Levi Megenbir3:13:11

Next slide.

Levi Megenbir3:13:14

So what is Rapid Bus?

Levi Megenbir3:13:16

BC Transit defines Rapid Bus as being a service that's connected, frequent, fast, and reliable.

Levi Megenbir3:13:22

It's usually provided on corridors connecting sort of key urban centers that exhibit higher density and mixed use areas.

Levi Megenbir3:13:31

In terms of what Rapid Bus looks like, usually it's operated on high capacity vehicles.

Levi Megenbir3:13:37

It's usually a separately branded service.

Levi Megenbir3:13:41

It usually has corridor treatments like bus lanes, Q jumpers, transit signal priority to allow it to travel faster than mixed traffic.

Levi Megenbir3:13:51

Usually has improved station amenities, limited stops, and high service frequency as well.

Levi Megenbir3:13:57

Next slide.

Levi Megenbir3:13:59

Lindsay kind of alluded to this earlier, but since the 2011 transit future plan, we've since completed the rapid bus implementation strategy in 2021.

Levi Megenbir3:14:09

And this strategy really breaks out the rollout of Rapid Bus across the region into three separate phases, with the first phase being the West Shore Rapid Bus Line, phase two being the McKenzie and Peninsula Rapid Bus lines, and then phase three, including a number of different potential rapid bus candidate corridors moving into the future as we continue to assess rapid bus within the region in the coming years.

Levi Megenbir3:14:35

Next slide.

Levi Megenbir3:14:37

We have some really exciting news to share today.

Levi Megenbir3:14:41

The phase one West Shore Rapid Bus Line did launch yesterday on April 10th.

Levi Megenbir3:14:46

As part of that launch, we introduced the new Route 95 Langford downtown, Blink Rapid Bus Line, which replaced the existing Route 50.

Levi Megenbir3:14:54

The new Route 95 operates along the same route for the time being, but with additional service levels and fewer bus stops.

Levi Megenbir3:15:01

So now we're seeing about seven to eight minutes peak frequency on weekdays with a minimum of 15 minute service most of the rest of the time, other than very early in the morning and very late at night.

Sid Tobias3:15:14

Next slide.

Levi Megenbir3:15:17

So this map shows the routing of the new Route 95 and also the station locations.

Levi Megenbir3:15:22

So this represents about 30% fewer stops than we served on the original Route 50.

Levi Megenbir3:15:29

Really, the goal for that for that change was to ensure that the bus is spending more time on the road traveling and less time pulled over stopped at bus stops.

Sid Tobias3:15:37

Next slide.

Levi Megenbir3:15:50

So you'll notice that everything is painted in orange.

Levi Megenbir3:15:53

So orange and blink go together.

Levi Megenbir3:15:56

You'll see the bus stop poll and signs showing the orange visualization.

Levi Megenbir3:16:03

And on a number of stations across the corridor, we've booked out advertising panels in the in the bus shelters themselves to provide additional information about rapid bus and further branding information.

Sid Tobias3:16:15

Next slide.

Levi Megenbir3:16:30

There is different than the green that we would have on all the other bus stops with within the system.

Levi Megenbir3:16:37

So it's visually distinct.

Levi Megenbir3:16:38

And when you arrive at a rapid bus station, you can really visually indicate that yes, this is being served by a rapid bus.

Levi Megenbir3:16:45

Uh additionally, we've got the round blank sign uh with a QR code so people can scan it and learn more about the service.

Levi Megenbir3:16:53

So that was a quick high-level overview of rapid bus within the region and what we've uh been up to over the last little while.

Levi Megenbir3:17:00

Uh so we'll turn it over to James Wadsworth now to speak to some of the infrastructure elements.

Don Brown3:17:06

Hello.

Don Brown3:17:07

Thank you for having us here tonight.

J. Wadsworth3:17:09

Uh I just threw in a few images to start that show some of the successes we've had over the last few years of implementing rapid bus stations and bus lanes uh with the city of Victoria on Douglas Street, as well as the Ministry of Transportation on Highway One.

J. Wadsworth3:17:28

They've been a great success.

J. Wadsworth3:17:29

And combined all together, these are saving 20 minutes a day for transit riders going along the corridor, which is a great improvement.

J. Wadsworth3:17:37

Getting home 20 minutes early or getting to work 20 minutes early is really making transit a more viable choice.

J. Wadsworth3:17:45

When you're out on the island highway and you're looking around, you you're often seeing people lining up in the morning to get on the bus.

J. Wadsworth3:17:52

And so part of what we want to do is make that a better experience than it is today.

J. Wadsworth3:17:58

When we work with communities, we have an infrastructure development uh planning process uh that we go through.

J. Wadsworth3:18:05

So we we take things out of the the transit future strategy, which which Levi just talked about those, and work with local governments to turn those into real projects that deliver real results for people.

J. Wadsworth3:18:16

So often when we start those uh that planning, we start doing uh a study where we work with local government staff, we come up with a concept, uh, we bring those concepts uh to to look uh to councils because they're the approving authority for for local governments.

J. Wadsworth3:18:34

Uh we quite often will obtain approval and principle.

J. Wadsworth3:18:36

And if we feel there's a project to move forward, then we go to the transit commission, which has regional governance for transit, but they're also the funders for transit, and we present those opportunities to the commission, and and quite often they'll they'll approve the the funding for these objects, and then we'll move forward and keep on on planning with local governments.

J. Wadsworth3:18:59

And so once we've done that, we're we're working with the the province and the federal government to secure uh funding grants.

J. Wadsworth3:19:07

And then if we're successful, then we're back to do uh to work with the communities to deliver those projects.

J. Wadsworth3:19:12

Sometimes we'll will deliver uh those construction projects, and sometimes it will be the local government that do that.

J. Wadsworth3:19:19

So that's the process that we go through, and it's not a fast process, it takes three to to seven years to do those because we need to be thoughtful, come up with plans that that work from for communities for for all angles.

J. Wadsworth3:19:33

Um the projects that we have moving forward here that some of you are probably familiar with is on the island highway.

J. Wadsworth3:19:41

We have a transit priority uh project that we've been working with View Royal and Collwood for several years on.

J. Wadsworth3:19:47

I'll get in a bit to the details of that, but it's uh we're right now we've made a funding application for $14.9 million uh for this project that will be funded by the Victoria Transit Commission, the local government share.

J. Wadsworth3:20:03

And we're we're just waiting to hear back if we're successful.

J. Wadsworth3:20:06

And if we are, we can move forward to the next phase, which would be constructing these, and that would likely occur in 2024 with the goal to have them in service in 2025.

J. Wadsworth3:20:18

And and these improvements on the island highway will actually uh improve transit travel times by 20%, uh, which again is is more travel time savings for getting people to and from work.

J. Wadsworth3:20:29

A little bit about the projects.

J. Wadsworth3:20:35

This is just an overview.

J. Wadsworth3:20:38

It includes a bus lane and View Royal in both directions between Highway One and the six-mile intersection.

J. Wadsworth3:20:47

With transit priority, also includes bike lanes and some modest landscaping improvements, and also a new intersection at Atkins Road for people to get back and forth across the street to safely move between the bus stops.

J. Wadsworth3:21:05

We're also this project also goes into Collwood where we have Q jump lanes at the Whale Road intersection and a bus lane that's being delivered in front of the Collwood Corner properties by the developer.

J. Wadsworth3:21:19

So at no cost to local government.

J. Wadsworth3:21:44

We've finished the technical study now, and we're we have some estimates of what it would cost and what the concepts are.

J. Wadsworth3:21:52

And so uh we're working with local government staff on how we might implement those.

J. Wadsworth3:21:57

Uh one of the things with these locations is quite often there's a third-party advertiser at them.

J. Wadsworth3:22:03

So I think we're we're gonna work with staff to explore the opportunity of how can we keep that partnership going and offset the costs of the transit investment with a third party.

J. Wadsworth3:22:13

And so we're still having those discussions, I think, before we come to council with a full plan.

J. Wadsworth3:22:18

But just so you're aware in View Royal, there's six bus stops or stations that are being planned, uh set at Helmakin, uh, Atkins, um, and at Wilfret.

J. Wadsworth3:22:31

Um the other thing we're doing is we're we're still doing planning work in downtown Victoria with the um with the city of Victoria, uh looking at how we can invest in the transit stops along there and add bus lanes to the street and how other modes uh work in that location.

J. Wadsworth3:22:46

So we're still uh going through that work as a separate a separate project.

J. Wadsworth3:22:53

Um and where are these?

J. Wadsworth3:22:56

This is the the process slide of where we are with the rapid bus stations.

J. Wadsworth3:23:01

Those are still not a project that uh we have approval from local government, the transit commission, or federal grant funding.

J. Wadsworth3:23:07

So we're still working through our concepts.

J. Wadsworth3:23:09

Uh the next step there would be to secure local government approval, and they'll go back to the commission uh for local local government funding with the island highway.

J. Wadsworth3:23:18

We've gone through all those steps already, and we have a tender-ready design.

Sid Tobias3:23:22

We're just waiting to hear uh from uh on our grant application uh so we can see how uh and when we would move forward with you on that so that is our presentation good and thank you uh for your presentation i know counselors have got a few questions so if you'd entertain a few of those that would make it um make my counselors happy I think so let's go with uh counselor lemon brown rogers and then McKenzie please hi and thank you thank you for your presentation um and congratulations on number 95.

Gery Lemon3:24:03

Um my first question is, will there be more number 95s on that route?

Gery Lemon3:24:09

Obviously it's a different number, but or maybe not.

Levi Megenbir3:24:14

Yeah, for sure.

Levi Megenbir3:24:15

So through the chair, great question.

Levi Megenbir3:24:17

Uh the the previous Route 50 and now the Route 95 is one of the highest ridership routes within the system.

Levi Megenbir3:24:23

And we've seen ridership growing on that route over time.

Levi Megenbir3:24:26

And I think in particular with branding this as a new rapid bus service uh and the ongoing development in the West Shore, we're going to see that demand for the service continue to grow into the future.

Levi Megenbir3:24:37

So we're going to need to add more service just to keep up with ridership growth in the coming years for sure.

Gery Lemon3:24:44

So so you'll have buses going every five to eight minutes along that route?

Levi Megenbir3:24:51

So as of right now, we're operating in peak periods about every seven to eight minutes.

Levi Megenbir3:24:56

Uh and so yeah, it we could potentially be seeing uh peak service uh happening even more frequently in the coming years for sure okay terrific and just one more question um on over on the six mile stretch of the island highway are is there uh going to be the loss of a um vehicle lane on each side to accommodate a bus lane and and the bike lanes no we're maintaining all travel lanes and and adding to that through a bit of a wider right of way okay wow okay thank you very much.

Don Brown3:25:34

So the uh light at the Atkins, I assume that's the where Atkins enters the island highway.

Don Brown3:25:40

Not Atkins we're at six mile.

Don Brown3:25:42

You mean down?

Kevin Klippenstein3:25:43

Yeah.

Don Brown3:25:43

And so is that light?

Don Brown3:25:45

I mean it's it's already heavily trafficked and and gets jammed up there.

Don Brown3:25:48

So when the buses come out, will it be like activated?

J. Wadsworth3:25:52

The light will be activated, so it won't always keep switching over to red and stopping more traffic, or or do you even know that so for the intersection of six mile and the other existing signalized um intersection where I call it you know going on to the the highway or or underneath the highway.

J. Wadsworth3:26:14

Um I believe the plan is that if the bus is stopped at the intersection and there's a red light, uh there are sensors in that will be in the ground and it will only trigger it than otherwise traffic.

Don Brown3:26:28

Yeah, perfect.

Don Brown3:26:29

Thank you.

Sid Tobias3:26:29

Counselor McKenzie, please.

Sid Tobias3:26:33

Counselor Rogers then.

John Rogers3:26:36

Yeah, lots of questions.

John Rogers3:26:38

Um actually I I was the one that asked you if I was to come, and my specific question was the um Atkins uh mobility hub.

John Rogers3:26:48

Because you know, we've we've seen the 2016 uh uh technical study um uh to view all and it showed a parking ride of about I don't know 200 cars, and I know that you're planning to have uh three parking rides uh to deal with anticipated 600 car.

John Rogers3:27:04

And um, so I'm assuming that view all parking ride would be uh about 200 cars.

John Rogers3:27:09

And I I noticed on page 12, um, you actually show a portion of that uh parking ride, if I'm not mistaken.

John Rogers3:27:16

Um, so you know, it rather than just having this little bit on the island highway, I wonder if we get um of you know uh a view out, if you could send us a copy of what this whole thing looks like with the anticipated park and ride, how many stalls, and um, you know, are you do you have that?

J. Wadsworth3:27:39

Uh so the projects that I showed you today, the the island highway transit priority project and the rapid bus station projects.

John Rogers3:27:49

Sorry, can you speak up?

J. Wadsworth3:27:50

Okay, sorry.

J. Wadsworth3:27:50

Um, so the projects that I showed you today, the uh transit priority project on the island highway and the rapid bus station project that we're working on.

J. Wadsworth3:27:59

Those are ones that uh BC Transit as a crown corporation are are are leading.

J. Wadsworth3:28:06

There are other projects um that include the bus lanes on Highway One and the Six Mile Mobility Hub, which would be led by the Ministry of Transportation, and they might be better to answer some of those questions around those.

John Rogers3:28:24

Right.

John Rogers3:28:25

Yeah, I know.

John Rogers3:28:26

Um maybe they do and maybe they don't.

John Rogers3:28:29

So um, but who who's on the drawings here on page 12?

J. Wadsworth3:28:37

I'd have to look at the drawings, those are probably yeah, it's uh it's on your display there that you uh showed us okay go um sorry one more slide go the other direction sorry yes yeah okay though the the drawing that I've shown you is just of the bus lane and any park and ride that is shown there is is existing park and ride there's no new drawings there that I sorry would you say it again is what the it's just an existing air photo of the existing site.

John Rogers3:29:18

I don't believe there's a drawing of a park and ride on the so you know, and with the information that I've been reading um as I've been going along, um it does speak of the um yeah, there we are.

John Rogers3:29:32

So it you know it does speak of um a a uh parking ride going in it uh and you I'm still not clear how many um stalls you plan to have, who your ridership of the Council Rogers, let's stop there.

Sid Tobias3:29:46

This is not the right people to ask those questions with.

Sid Tobias3:29:48

This is not their project, right?

Sid Tobias3:29:50

If you've got questions, we'll bring them up to Modi.

Sid Tobias3:29:53

But this is not the right audience to ask those questions because they obviously don't know.

Sid Tobias3:29:58

So let's let's uh defer any questions of parking ride to Modi as they've requested.

Sid Tobias3:30:03

I'm I'm just not liking the tone they don't have the answers.

Sid Tobias3:30:06

So let's let's delay that one for the next one.

Sid Tobias3:30:10

So you've got questions that don't involve a park and ride.

John Rogers3:30:13

Mm-hmm.

Sid Tobias3:30:14

Okay.

John Rogers3:30:17

So I guess these are I'll I'll wait and we'll see what the uh next uh section has.

John Rogers3:30:23

Um I I do appreciate yes let um I guess my my question here is and hopefully I'm not dealing with Ministry of Highways my concern is um the um you know the the the the rapid transit and and how you're going to handle the uh traffic uh on Goldstream because it seems pretty congested in there.

John Rogers3:30:47

And I don't know if are you going to be putting rapid uh lanes on Goldstream as well.

J. Wadsworth3:30:53

So we've we've looked at what is possible on on Goldstream, and it's the right of way is just not available for separate bus lanes and maintaining all the other general purpose traffic movements.

J. Wadsworth3:31:06

Uh, if we were to make any investments to speed or move buses along uh better on Goldstream, it would be what we call transit signal priority, where it's just the bus talking to the light and getting a green.

John Rogers3:31:21

Yeah, it's pretty tight, isn't it?

J. Wadsworth3:31:22

So it's it's the opportunities are very limited.

John Rogers3:31:26

We'll see.

John Rogers3:31:27

Thank you.

J. Wadsworth3:31:29

Council McKenzie.

Alison MacKenzie3:31:31

Hi, um, thank you for your presentation.

Alison MacKenzie3:31:33

I just was wondering, and if this is not uh in your remit, just let me know, but whether there'll be any additional uh bus routes connecting to that main route for people who don't live close to uh the rapid line.

Alison MacKenzie3:31:48

So people who can't walk there, will there be additional bus routes to take them to the McKenzie or Helmkin, for example?

Levi Megenbir3:31:56

Yeah, great question.

Levi Megenbir3:31:57

So through the chair, uh we recently completed in 2022 the West Shore Local Area Transit Plan.

Levi Megenbir3:32:04

And we also have a number of other local area transit plans, including the uh Burnside Tillicom uh local area transit plan that really provide uh priorities for investment in the local transit network to connect into the the rapid bus services that you're speaking to.

Levi Megenbir3:32:19

Uh one of the key priorities we have for the near future as well is restructuring the West Shore transit network really to better align with the density we've been seeing occurring within the West Shore and to connect in better with Rapid Bus.

Levi Megenbir3:32:32

So 100% we have plans to to make some significant improvements to the the local network both within the West Shore and and the view rural area to connect into Rapid Bus in the future.

Alison MacKenzie3:32:43

Great thank you.

Sid Tobias3:32:44

Thank you Council McKenzie.

Sid Tobias3:32:46

I'm gonna um go to Councillor Matson right now.

Sid Tobias3:32:49

Counselor Matson online.

Ron Mattson3:32:51

Excuse me thank you thank you for your presentation.

Ron Mattson3:32:54

I sort of have three questions one of them do you know I think you mentioned there'll be a 20% increase in ridership.

Ron Mattson3:33:02

I'm just wondering about numbers that you anticipate.

Ron Mattson3:33:06

And along with that, any you know estimates in terms of you know what impact you'll have on traffic or you know, getting people out of cars and into the buses.

Ron Mattson3:33:18

And Spree, how are we doing with the great retirement that seems to have hit everybody?

Ron Mattson3:33:23

Are you gonna have enough drivers for all of this?

Ron Mattson3:33:26

And those are my three questions.

Ron Mattson3:33:28

Thank you.

Sid Tobias3:33:30

Thank you, Council Manson.

Levi Megenbir3:33:33

Through the chair, some some great questions, not necessarily the easiest ones to answer.

Levi Megenbir3:33:37

Uh so I don't have an exact projection on the increase in ridership along the corridor.

Levi Megenbir3:33:42

Um we know that uh there's an anticipated uh 11% more people within the region between 2019 and 2028, 22% increase within the West Shore.

Levi Megenbir3:33:52

Um, so we're anticipating a quite a bit of additional ridership growth uh in particular on the new Route 95 in the coming years.

Levi Megenbir3:33:59

Don't have an exact number for you right now, unfortunately.

Levi Megenbir3:34:03

Um the second question.

Levi Megenbir3:34:08

Can you reiterate your your second question and third question now?

Ron Mattson3:34:11

Yeah, just the impact on traffic be are gonna be fewer cars.

Levi Megenbir3:34:16

I'm assuming no, but yeah, so that's a great question.

Levi Megenbir3:34:21

I think that this really speaks to the importance of investing in in rapid transit because our current right-aways are are pretty constrained, right?

Levi Megenbir3:34:30

And so the only effective way to move more people on a constrained right-of-way is to more move more people within within that existing right-of-away.

Levi Megenbir3:34:39

And with our double-decker buses, we can move way more people within the constrained road space.

Levi Megenbir3:34:44

So for every additional person we move to sticking transit versus driving a car, we're we're utilizing that limited road space in a much more efficient way.

Levi Megenbir3:34:54

So that's really the impetus behind Rapid Bus and how we're making our changes to really create transit as being a more enjoyable experience and a choice that uh we hope our uh commuters will will want to make and not just take because they feel they need to.

Ron Mattson3:35:12

And I think uh just a little last question.

Ron Mattson3:35:15

My my last question was just about uh in terms of we we have difficulty in sort of getting enough drivers for for all the new buses.

Levi Megenbir3:35:26

Yeah, so great question.

Levi Megenbir3:35:28

We like all the other industries uh through COVID and and emerging from COVID, uh we have had some challenges from an operator perspective, get enough drivers to to operate a routes.

Levi Megenbir3:35:39

Um we have had some some success in the last several months.

Levi Megenbir3:35:43

So that's allowed us to do this new rapid bus launch, which is exciting.

Levi Megenbir3:35:47

And we do continue to the trajectory seems to be positive.

Levi Megenbir3:35:51

So um we're just gonna continue to to work with our people and culture team and and uh work to hire more operators so we can continue investing in transit moving forward into the future.

Ron Mattson3:36:01

Okay, thank you very much.

Ron Mattson3:36:03

Appreciate your answers.

Sid Tobias3:36:05

Thank you.

Sid Tobias3:36:05

I've got a couple of questions before I pass you back over for uh seconds for Councillor Rogers, but um uh one is I've noticed I was looking at the stats for View Royal, and our ridership, of course, took a hit during COVID, and it doesn't seem like we've really recovered.

Sid Tobias3:36:22

Are you just wondering if that's a trend that you're seeing a full recovery other places, or is it still lagging behind kind of pre-COVID ridership?

Levi Megenbir3:36:34

Yeah, so uh we're seeing about a 90% return of ridership uh pre-COVID uh across our PC transit systems, and Victoria is falling very close to that average right now as well.

Levi Megenbir3:36:46

So it has been great to see the significant recovery in the last couple of years.

Levi Megenbir3:36:50

We were down to in some cases 40 to 50 percent at certain times uh through through the COVID pandemic, and uh we have been seeing over the last couple months that those numbers continue to trickle upwards.

Levi Megenbir3:36:59

Good.

Levi Megenbir3:37:01

So we're anticipating that trend to continue into the future.

Sid Tobias3:37:07

Thanks.

Sid Tobias3:37:07

And it's good good to see it starting to recover.

Sid Tobias3:37:11

My uh next and last question was just on key performance indicators.

Sid Tobias3:37:16

Like uh, how are you judging your success with this?

Sid Tobias3:37:19

And I know um there's speed, but I also was a um was a public transit rider getting downtown before I got to work remotely.

Sid Tobias3:37:30

And even though it was advertised that it was every six minutes that I could hop on, I was at least a half an hour before I could.

Sid Tobias3:37:38

There was a bus every six minutes, but they were all full when they went by View Royal.

Sid Tobias3:37:43

So I I guess my question is like, uh, are is that something you're monitoring as well?

Sid Tobias3:37:48

Because we're in a lovely place in View Royal that we're kind of in between everywhere, which means that everything is normally full when we try to get on it.

Sid Tobias3:37:58

So just wondering your thoughts on that.

Levi Megenbir3:38:02

Yeah, that's a great question.

Levi Megenbir3:38:04

Uh one of our other strategic planning documents we we completed within the last several years and we revisit on an annual basis is our new 10 year vision document for the Victoria Regional Transit System.

Levi Megenbir3:38:17

In that document, we have a series of key performance indicators that we use to assess how the transit system is functioning, and also set establishing our goals for the system and how we're moving towards it on an annual basis.

Levi Megenbir3:38:30

So that includes targets around transit mode share, service reliability, access to transit, both from for all transit and also frequent transit, and then also customer satisfaction.

Levi Megenbir3:38:45

So we're tracking a number of these indicators that help us better understand how the system's doing every year.

Levi Megenbir3:38:52

But on a service change by service change basis, we are looking at how ridership patterns are changing with the system and making minute adjustments both to like how much time each trip has, so it's it's gonna remain on schedule, and also shifting some trips around as required to help mitigate things like passenger pass-ups or passenger crowding.

Levi Megenbir3:39:14

Um, so we have opportunities to invest additional resources, but we also on a regular basis look at how we can shift some things around to help improve the experience for passengers out on the road, and that definitely includes uh uh URL residents as well.

Sid Tobias3:39:30

Thank you.

Sid Tobias3:39:31

Thank you for your answer.

Sid Tobias3:39:32

Uh Councilor Rogers, please.

John Rogers3:39:34

Yes, uh we've just been undergoing a uh active transportation plan, and one of the key um uh reports that we had great pleasure in reading was the um local area plan for uh Esquamo, View Royal, Sainage, and the two First Nations.

John Rogers3:39:49

Really excited to hear about the number 40 bus, which is um going to be at McKenzie and and seems like a a fabulous opportunity for uh the billing to uh link up with the 40 and and um really assist um you know our five communities.

John Rogers3:40:05

Any idea when number 40 is going to be able to uh coincide and complement this uh rapid bus?

Levi Megenbir3:40:12

Yeah, so through the chair, it's a great question.

Levi Megenbir3:40:15

Every year uh we work with the commission to establish uh expansion resources on a three-year cycle, and as part of that process, we take all of our expansion priorities and we rank them in something we call the transit expansion prioritization process.

Levi Megenbir3:40:31

Um, so because these the amount of resources we have available on any given year changes depending on what the province endorses.

Levi Megenbir3:40:38

I can't give you an exact timeline.

Levi Megenbir3:40:40

What I can say is that the Route 40 is definitely in the in the top echelon of of expansion parties uh within the system.

Levi Megenbir3:40:49

So it's definitely ranking very well.

Levi Megenbir3:40:52

So I can't give you an exact timeline, but it it's it's definitely gonna be one of the top priorities moving into the future.

John Rogers3:41:01

Good.

John Rogers3:41:02

Next year would be nice too.

John Rogers3:41:04

Okay, so my next uh my next question again, I have to come back to this light, and I know that you know it's nothing to do with you in terms of the implementation or so forth.

John Rogers3:41:12

That's our next presenter.

John Rogers3:41:14

But um, you know, having a traffic light between the six mile and uh the theatres interchange, and it's already incredibly congested and and challenging to uh to get traffic through there.

John Rogers3:41:27

Um, do you think um, and I guess it's you know could have worst case neighbors are backing up across the uh Parsley Street Bridge.

John Rogers3:41:33

Um, do you think that's going to have a detrimental effect on both on uh the Blink Rapid Bus as well as the abilities for say the number 53 that has to go from Atkins from Theatus Lake and down and the congestion that might occur on on six mile road?

John Rogers3:41:51

Any any thoughts, any traffic studies or analysis that projects on on these routes and and impacts?

Ivan Leung3:41:58

Uh just to the chair, um about a year ago, staff presented um a report to council regarding the traffic signals along Island Highway with respect to the crosswalk.

Ivan Leung3:42:09

And um that is still in play, and also uh staff as in ourselves will be presenting another report to council regarding our recommendation.

John Rogers3:42:18

Yeah, um is that going to include the traffic analysis with respect to this light and the impacts on traffic and buses and so forth?

Ivan Leung3:42:27

So it would probably piggyback on the previous analysis where the traffic signals are going to be timed so that the disruption is minimal.

John Rogers3:42:36

I don't, yeah.

John Rogers3:42:38

Yeah.

John Rogers3:42:39

It's six miles has already been a a real issue.

John Rogers3:42:42

So I guess we'll have to see that.

John Rogers3:42:43

But you know, it seems to me that that's one, that's few oils issue, but I think would also have an impact on on the um really enthusiastic uh delivery times of this rapid bus if uh you're gonna be sitting in traffic.

John Rogers3:42:59

And that's that's a transit question.

J. Wadsworth3:43:07

You know, when when we plan infrastructure such as signals, we have to take advice from the local government staff as well, because they understand things outside of the transit purview that are not our responsibility.

J. Wadsworth3:43:22

But when I think of uh transit's interest in there, uh today we have two bus stops all right there on the corridor, and they're set up in a way that really encourages people to run across the the road and not go down to the intersection to to cross it.

J. Wadsworth3:43:40

So uh we're looking at from a safety perspective where if we're investing in rapid bus stations, we'd we'd like there to be a safe uh way for people to cross the road.

John Rogers3:43:52

Right.

John Rogers3:43:52

So um, you know, why wouldn't you put in a pedestrian overpass as opposed to a traffic light that then would not impact the uh your delivery of uh speeds of buses?

John Rogers3:44:02

You know, the pedestrians would still safely cross over.

Ivan Leung3:44:10

It's a good question.

Ivan Leung3:44:11

I don't know as a fact about that.

Ivan Leung3:44:14

Um costs might be associated with that, I would assume.

John Rogers3:44:18

Yeah.

J. Wadsworth3:44:18

I I think that's what uh Mac Alhaney, who was the consultant, recommended to the the parties.

John Rogers3:44:25

I would really enjoy and appreciate if um both staff and transit would be able to provide counsel with some, you know, really, you know, when we have a development proposal, they bring a traffic study.

John Rogers3:44:36

So uh and this this really, you know, when I was in that area and and uh the concerns of residents uh about having another traffic light to contend with, especially the thousand homes that live on Choco, um, it it is something that um I hope that we're really gonna be forthcoming on and and all the information will be on the table.

Sid Tobias3:44:55

And maybe when that comes around, Councilor Rogers will deal with it then.

Sid Tobias3:44:59

Um the other issue is crossing six lanes of traffic.

Sid Tobias3:45:03

I think right there, uh, whether you're walking uh or not, is is probably not the safest thing either.

Sid Tobias3:45:10

But we'll deal with that another day.

Sid Tobias3:45:12

I share with you your enthusiasm for a project.

Sid Tobias3:45:14

Well done, and I'm really looking forward to seeing its effect on getting folks out of the cars and into a bus.

Sid Tobias3:45:21

And I know it was a lot of hard work to get here.

Sid Tobias3:45:23

So on behalf of council, thanks for coming out and spending the time and briefing us tonight.

Sid Tobias3:45:28

It was uh well reserved, uh well deserved, and your congratulations on uh uh a good launch.

Sid Tobias3:45:35

I know that uh you ran your first one yesterday, wasn't it?

J. Wadsworth3:45:40

Thank you.

J. Wadsworth3:45:40

We appreciate council and staff's support in advancing these projects.

Sid Tobias3:45:47

Thank you very much.

Sid Tobias3:45:48

And if there's no further questions, I think we're can move down to um the next item, which was the Highway One Bus on Shoulder project.

Sid Tobias3:45:59

Probably very linked to what we just heard, but always to improve it.

M. Pearson3:46:26

Thanks for having us at the meeting today.

M. Pearson3:46:27

I'm looking forward to the questions that you'll have for us.

M. Pearson3:46:30

Um, so my name is Mike Pearson.

M. Pearson3:46:32

I'm the director for Vancouver Island District with the Ministry of Transportation.

M. Pearson3:46:35

Uh look after Vancouver Island.

M. Pearson3:46:37

Um, and with me tonight I have Tim Stevens.

M. Pearson3:46:39

Uh he is a consultant working for us on the bus on the Highway One Bus on Shoulder project.

M. Pearson3:46:44

Um, tonight we wanted to provide you a bit of an over overview of the work that we're currently undertaking in design.

M. Pearson3:46:49

And I'll have Tim sort of walk through the slides and give a bit of a presentation, and then I guess we'll take questions at the end.

Sid Tobias3:46:56

Okay, well, thanks, Mike.

Patrick Stevens3:46:59

Good evening, Mr.

Patrick Stevens3:47:01

Mayor and Counselors.

Patrick Stevens3:47:02

Um, so I'll just run through this and then yes, as Mike said, we can answer questions at the end.

Patrick Stevens3:47:10

So what we want to go through is a little bit of background to the project here.

Patrick Stevens3:47:14

Uh with um the scope of what we're doing, the schedule, when when we hope to do it, where we are now, the current status, some of the impacts on on the town of Uroyal infrastructure, although most of it it's almost all on the highway but there are some peripheral impacts and uh we'd like to uh hear about what your concerns are so we can take them into consideration and then we'll we can talk about next steps.

Patrick Stevens3:47:44

Uh so the the background the South Island South Island Rapid Trans or South Island Transportation uh strategy included as as an important project the the um uh the bus on bus on rapid bus line from downtown Victoria to west shore which is similar to the previous uh sub uh this submission um you can I don't know if it works anyway whoops no it doesn't um excuse me so the the blue line is it's constructed from uh downtown out to Tillicum and then the McKenzie interchange included uh high a bus on shoulder infrastructure uh so there's a piece in between which is called the Burnside Bridges and that work is underway in design and functional design and then there's the part that we're uh the subject of this presentation, which is really to go from McKenzie interchange out to the Callwood interchange and and to the to the light where uh Old Island Highway is.

Patrick Stevens3:48:58

Um, and then the future parts are uh Old Island Highway and and uh some work on on um Goldstream eventually.

Patrick Stevens3:49:10

Next slide.

Patrick Stevens3:49:12

So the project area is entirely within the ministry's right-of-in fact.

Patrick Stevens3:49:17

For this project, we don't anticipate any uh property acquisition whatsoever.

Patrick Stevens3:49:23

Um generally working from sort of uh Victoria side east side to west or um the outbound traffic.

Patrick Stevens3:49:33

There we're anticipating some minor changes at the McKenzie on ramp so the buses can get across when they come off the uh interchange, they can get across to the outside lane.

Patrick Stevens3:49:44

And then between uh McKenzie and Helmkin, the widening would be to the outside because there is no the the median is just a barrier, so the only way we can go is to the outside.

Patrick Stevens3:49:56

Um and then up, then it will go up the ramps of the uh Helmkin ramps, down the other side, and then uh between Helmkin and the Collwood interchange, we're going to widen into the middle.

Patrick Stevens3:50:09

So we don't have to widen the outside and make uh, you know, there's a lot of work to try to widen the highway that way, and the median is unused, and then around the ramp uh to connect into the signal with Olin and Highway, and it's basically the same going inbound.

Patrick Stevens3:50:33

So the project cross section, this is between uh McKenzie and Helmkin, the widenings to the outside, and you can see that there's work on the left side of the drawing.

Patrick Stevens3:50:44

There's some rock cut that we have to do there.

Patrick Stevens3:50:47

And the the lane will be a four meter wide lane for the buses.

Patrick Stevens3:50:54

And then from Helmkin to Calwood, it's on the inside, as you can see here, and we hold the outside of the pavement.

Patrick Stevens3:51:03

The only reason you see the dotted line on the outside is we may have to re rebuild some of the shoulders to be stronger to hold the buses.

Sid Tobias3:51:16

So our current project status, we've done our preliminary design that was finished uh uh last year.

Patrick Stevens3:51:23

We started a functional design in September, and we expect to be done in uh May, the end of May.

Patrick Stevens3:51:30

Uh, we've done some geotechnical investigations.

Patrick Stevens3:51:33

I think we've got almost all of it done.

Patrick Stevens3:51:35

We may have to do a little bit on the Galloping Goose Trail Bridge, which I'll talk to you about in a moment, and then the detailed design will get underway in June.

Patrick Stevens3:51:44

And the detailed design will take about a year to get done, maybe a little bit more.

Patrick Stevens3:51:49

Uh, and then at that point, we'd be ready for construction if if when we get funding for it.

Patrick Stevens3:51:59

Um so now some of the specific impacts that uh maybe of interest to Brew Royal.

Patrick Stevens3:52:05

The first is the where Burnside Road comes onto the Callwood Interchange Ramp.

Patrick Stevens3:52:11

Um and you know, we recognize that that's a a bit of a difficult entry onto the onto the ramp.

Patrick Stevens3:52:19

So we're looking at different ways to make it more into let's call it a yield size type of entry.

Patrick Stevens3:52:26

Um it's not quite that simple because you got the bus lane in the way as well.

Patrick Stevens3:52:30

Uh so we're looking at about three or four different options to do that, and when we get them sorted out, we'll bring them back to staff and uh and to council if necessary, and and and present on those.

Patrick Stevens3:52:44

But we recognize it's a I don't we don't we're not convinced it's a safety issue, but it's uncomfortable for drivers.

Patrick Stevens3:52:53

Um the second just two slides on on this potential impacts at Helmkin.

Patrick Stevens3:52:59

The first is rather simple.

Patrick Stevens3:53:01

Basically, we have to upgrade the bus stops.

Patrick Stevens3:53:04

Um and so that's really what this slide shows is there's some upgrades to the bus stops on both sides to accommodate the rapid bus.

Patrick Stevens3:53:13

The second slide really um recognizes that the on ramp here is a fairly high speed on ramp, and there's a pedestrian crossing for people wanting to get to the Galloping Goose Trail or to the hospital, which I think is more of an attractor.

Patrick Stevens3:53:31

And so we're looking at ways to modify this to get traffic controlled better, slow down, make it safer for the pedestrians.

Patrick Stevens3:53:42

We've got a bunch of different options.

Patrick Stevens3:53:44

We haven't settled on any of them yet.

Patrick Stevens3:53:47

But suffice it to say that you know we want to make this a bit tighter.

Patrick Stevens3:54:00

At Helmkin, really, there will be no changes other than putting in uh the new bus shelters and and and paving more of the islands to accommodate that.

Patrick Stevens3:54:09

The the radiuses on the uh entrances and exit are are much tighter than they are on the north side, and the traffic volumes are much lower, so there's not really a safety issue there.

Patrick Stevens3:54:25

Um and now the Galloping Goose Trail Bridge.

Patrick Stevens3:54:28

So right now, the off-ramp from Callwood uh the that bridge is three lanes wide.

Patrick Stevens3:54:36

The third lane is used for the Gallop Goose Trail.

Patrick Stevens3:54:39

Now that third lane in the future will be used for the rapid bus system.

Patrick Stevens3:54:44

So now we have to find uh a way to get the Galloping Goose Trail over uh Craig Lower Creek.

Patrick Stevens3:54:51

So the proposal is to build a new bridge there, and there's only really one place we could put it because there's water means and all kinds of other things in there.

Patrick Stevens3:54:59

So this is the proposal to put it in this location.

Patrick Stevens3:55:05

It will be elevated to make sure that it matches the other bridges and the and the any flood flow can go underneath it, things like that.

Patrick Stevens3:55:17

And the style of the bridge is single span, it will clear span the creek.

Patrick Stevens3:55:22

So we won't be doing any work in the creek other than putting some rip wrap on, but I think it's six meters wide.

Patrick Stevens3:55:34

Very close to it.

Patrick Stevens3:55:35

It it pretty well matches the bridge that we put in at um uh McKenzie.

Patrick Stevens3:55:43

And that's the proposal, that's the presentation.

Patrick Stevens3:55:44

So any questions from the town, we'd be happy to take them.

Sid Tobias3:55:53

Thank you.

Sid Tobias3:55:53

Thank you for your presentation.

Sid Tobias3:55:54

Good to see you again, Mike.

Sid Tobias3:55:56

Um, one of the concerns I have is if you can go back to the uh North Helmkin interchange, it's not so much the safety uh for the folks on the uh going across that that's a concern.

Sid Tobias3:56:12

Um, but getting from the northbound bus station across the on ramp to the highway from Helmkin, that's the heading to the hospital.

Sid Tobias3:56:25

That is not controlled by a light.

Sid Tobias3:56:28

And there's only uh one way people drive to get on the on-ramp and the highway, and there's on very fast.

Sid Tobias3:56:37

And they don't often see somebody walking across that crosswalk.

Sid Tobias3:56:42

There's not a light above it at night that really shines down and defines it as such.

Sid Tobias3:56:47

So uh in your plans, if anything could be done to also improve safety as you exit that northbound, because you're finding lots more folks on that going to Eagle Creek or the hospital, both workers and and uh and shoppers.

Sid Tobias3:57:03

And if you could take a look at that when you're doing things, I don't think it would be expensive to look at safety considerations there, if you would.

Sid Tobias3:57:11

Um, any other questions from council?

John Rogers3:57:13

Um council road hi thanks thanks very much um you've made my day um i'm i'm really pleased to see that you've um uh doing the widening from McKenzie uh to helm and it looks like you're gonna have both lanes bus lanes dedicated bus lanes on both sides yes that's including the Portage Park side right portage linear park you know by the by the water yeah yeah inbound and outbound yes yeah perfect well done um and really pleased to hear about the uh the the raw cut so that it makes it really easy to go from McKenzie uh up to the um um uh McKenzie Helmican overpass.

John Rogers3:57:50

Um the mayor is quite right.

John Rogers3:57:52

You know, I'm I'm really thrilled that you've identified this issue.

John Rogers3:57:56

Um the community has been complaining about this, really worried about the safety aspects, and and uh same with what uh uh the mayor is saying on the other side.

John Rogers3:58:04

These are little points that we missed in the active transportation plan, but I'm sure glad you guys caught it.

John Rogers3:58:09

Um the the bus stops that you're putting on here, remarkable, well done, nice big size, you know, to accommodate the anticipated users.

John Rogers3:58:17

I'm wondering why you haven't thought of increasing the park and ride on Helmican.

John Rogers3:58:23

There is space for another 2030 cars.

Patrick Stevens3:58:26

Um basically it's not this in the scope of our work.

John Rogers3:58:30

So it would be helpful, wouldn't it?

John Rogers3:58:34

You know, it if if we are anticipating such dramatic uh increase in ridership, um, I would hope that you may want to think about uh that and and um you know help uh transit along and and work with them on increasing the uh the parking ride capacity I can maybe ask that a little bit um yeah that that parking ride there it's as I'm sure you're all aware it's it's difficult to manage.

M. Pearson3:59:01

Uh not only is there parking riders there, there's also employee parking and all kinds of other stuff happening there.

M. Pearson3:59:07

So um you can be creative on that.

M. Pearson3:59:10

Sorry?

M. Pearson3:59:11

You can get creative on that.

M. Pearson3:59:13

So certainly there's more space to build it bigger but I think there's discussions that need to be had about how best to operate it um whenever with all these parking rights because certainly within the Ministry of Transportation we don't have uh a bylaw or any sort of enforcement like that.

M. Pearson3:59:27

So um having that space there is is helpful for transit users but it's not always used the same way it's intended.

John Rogers3:59:34

But certainly open to the conversation.

John Rogers3:59:36

Indeed indeed if you know if you have people coming down from the Malahat and they get there maybe earlier than the hospital worker then looks like they'll win.

John Rogers3:59:46

Yes.

John Rogers3:59:47

Anyway so that's that's a thought.

John Rogers3:59:49

If I can go to the next point um you know the Galloping Goose Trail Bridge one of the things coming out of the active transportation plan is a real concern about pedestrian safety on the Galloping Goose.

John Rogers4:00:01

And as you may know, that um the CRD is widening the goose to include a pedestrian lane, so the total are six meters.

John Rogers4:00:08

And so um in anticipation of um you know can continued growth on the galloping goose, and it's really a uh leaps and bounds, please put in a third lane.

John Rogers4:00:21

So you've got the two conventional bi directional cycling, which creates a conflict on uh for pedestrians on a bridge.

John Rogers4:00:30

They got nowhere to go, they can't go to the dirt, and they're not gonna go into the water.

John Rogers4:00:35

So um let's widen the bridges and and really help out the pedestrians.

John Rogers4:00:41

Okay, thank you.

Sid Tobias4:00:42

Thank you, Council Rogers.

Sid Tobias4:00:43

Councillor Lennon.

Gery Lemon4:00:45

Quick question.

Gery Lemon4:00:46

Uh well, I hope it's quick.

Gery Lemon4:00:48

Um it's in um um working on this project, will you be enhancing the sound barriers along the portage inlet side?

Gery Lemon4:01:00

Because there are there are, as you probably know, there's neighborhoods right back there and and it's noisy.

Patrick Stevens4:01:09

Sure.

Sid Tobias4:01:10

That's Mike's favorite question, actually.

Patrick Stevens4:01:14

We we haven't decided if we're going to enhance any of the the noise uh noise barrier at this time.

Patrick Stevens4:01:21

We have uh a consultant on board who's doing noise study, and we've got some initial results that indicate that the uh the noise generated by the boss on shoulder is minimal.

Patrick Stevens4:01:35

Uh but you know, we haven't made any decisions at all about what we're uh gonna do or not do with respect to noise abatement.

Gery Lemon4:01:44

Thank you, folks.

Gery Lemon4:01:46

We'll keep it in your pocket.

Sid Tobias4:01:50

If there's uh no further questions, last one, Councillor Rogers.

John Rogers4:01:56

The mayor promised me that you would be talking about uh the whole issue of the uh new proposed traffic light at um the six mile U hub.

John Rogers4:02:06

You know, we didn't want to talk transit because that's not their problem.

John Rogers4:02:09

But I'm assuming that you're the ones that are gonna be doing the widening and putting in the um mobility hub and and the traffic and and all that work there.

John Rogers4:02:17

Is that correct?

Patrick Stevens4:02:18

That's not in the scope of this project.

Patrick Stevens4:02:21

We stopped right at the traffic light at you know where old island highway makes the right turn onto the uh towards here.

Patrick Stevens4:02:29

Um that's where our project stops.

Patrick Stevens4:02:29

Mike and speak on that.

Patrick Stevens4:02:29

Okay, so who's doing it?

Sid Tobias4:02:34

I think Mike could probably help you.

M. Pearson4:02:37

Yeah, so so um the ministry also within the South Island Transportation Strategy, you'll probably notice in if if you've you know take uh read through it, um we have identified six mile as a potential mobility hub location.

M. Pearson4:02:51

So what does that really mean?

M. Pearson4:02:52

Um we're not certain currently we're we're about to undertake some initial planning work on that.

M. Pearson4:02:58

So questions are you asked questions earlier around how many stalls, what does that look like?

M. Pearson4:03:02

What is it?

M. Pearson4:03:03

We don't know yet.

M. Pearson4:03:04

Um, we're just actually literally getting started on that work.

M. Pearson4:03:07

But looking at the footprint, the fact that it has both the ENN trail, the galloping goose, close proximity to the highway.

M. Pearson4:03:13

Certainly it's a centralized location where now and of course with that tie in with transit and the rapid bus line, it's certainly that centralized location, which makes sense to have that integration of transportation choices.

M. Pearson4:03:24

Um, but we don't know what that looks like yet.

M. Pearson4:03:26

So we're about to undertake that sort of first step of planning work.

M. Pearson4:03:29

Um whether it's a signal or not, the signal is outside of our our sort of mobility hub scope, but it we know it's right adjacent to it.

M. Pearson4:03:36

So it's more to do with the implementation of the rapid bus line and the safety of pedestrians crossing the highway.

M. Pearson4:03:42

But um, we're as I say, just starting on that that work for that site.

Sid Tobias4:03:46

So I'm I'm not gonna allow you to follow-up, I'm gonna make a comment, Councilor Rogers.

Sid Tobias4:03:52

Um one of the things that work well, and uh I think Mike, you and I discussed this with Handy Dart, is they got um some really good engagement specialists in early to not only work with staff and and and council but also uh work with uh citizens because they've uh they can come up with some really good ideas too.

Sid Tobias4:04:12

So before you get too far down on that track, I would I would really love your thoughts on whether you'd engage uh or you'd enlist some engagement specialists on that.

M. Pearson4:04:24

Yeah no absolutely um this is this is for me anyways and 17 years with ministry this is sort of a new new concept for us.

M. Pearson4:04:31

So certainly um we'll come up with some ideas and we want to, and I actually would like to engage with your staff first, um, as well as as it's likely as we'll have to go to the public at some point.

M. Pearson4:04:41

We'll want to have a good sense of what we're even talking about before we get there.

M. Pearson4:04:45

But um, first start at a technical level, what happened, what do we really need and what are we trying to accomplish, and then start to get into those really creative ideas because I think there is that opportunity when we're integrating, you know, potentially residential, commercial, all kinds of things that are potential.

M. Pearson4:04:59

Um, we need we need we need the experts in those things.

M. Pearson4:05:02

That's and that's certainly outside of transportation.

Sid Tobias4:05:04

So thanks, Mike.

Sid Tobias4:05:06

And uh I just a couple of notes on parks and rides.

Sid Tobias4:05:09

I I live beside one in Ottawa, and it never had a car in it in five years.

Sid Tobias4:05:14

Um, but the kids used it as a skate park, and it worked exceptionally well for that.

Sid Tobias4:05:19

Um, the the other um one was I think on the mainland where they built a park and ride, and there was a few cars in it, and then they actually started charging them for it, and then there was no cars in it.

Sid Tobias4:05:29

So uh land right now, particularly on that juncture, is really precious.

Sid Tobias4:05:36

Uh and there's been kind of a propensity, we'll just pave it like a parking lot.

Sid Tobias4:05:41

If there's any way we could go vertical and mix some other amenities in that to save some uh valuable space as well as concentrate it and start it as a pilot and kind of work our way, how much ridership is this gonna take on?

Sid Tobias4:05:56

Because um some of my friends that live on the Malahat say, well, if I've got to come across the Malahat and I want to take the bus and I've got a park and it's taking me still longer to get downtown than it would have if I kept on driving, then I'm not gonna stop.

Sid Tobias4:06:12

Right?

Sid Tobias4:06:13

So where where where that point is with the two projects that all of a sudden it is faster considerably to go downtown on the bus, then I think you're going to see some real behavior change.

Sid Tobias4:06:24

But thanks for your presentation.

Sid Tobias4:06:25

Council Rogers, do you have a still have a question?

John Rogers4:06:27

Yeah, thanks.

John Rogers4:06:28

Um again, um, so I'm not sure who the author is of that diagram that we saw on page 12.

John Rogers4:06:33

But uh it if it's um way before you, then somebody's got it, and I'd love to see the details.

John Rogers4:06:39

Um the mayor's absolutely right.

John Rogers4:06:40

You know, Handy Dart did a fabulous uh PR job in bringing everybody on board.

John Rogers4:06:45

It was it was uh for a bunch of for community that was opposed, they they were sold and they they bought in.

John Rogers4:06:51

The so that's really an issue because obviously all the people that live on Atkins and Six Mile are scared to death of what this traffic light is gonna do to the congestion, and you know that's gonna have a real bad impact on both directions of the uh Trans Canada as well.

John Rogers4:07:06

Thank you.

Sid Tobias4:07:08

Thanks.

Sid Tobias4:07:09

I don't see any further questions and thanks again, uh Mike and uh Tim for coming out tonight and uh sharing this project with us.

Sid Tobias4:07:17

Much appreciated.

Sid Tobias4:07:19

Thank you.

Sid Tobias4:07:22

And I think this brings us to a public participation period.

Sid Tobias4:07:27

So is there anybody in the chambers who would like to address council this evening?

Sid Tobias4:07:36

Not a person.

Sid Tobias4:07:37

How about online?

Sid Tobias4:07:39

Carl, we got anybody online?

Don Brown4:07:41

Mayor Tobias, we have no callers.

Sid Tobias4:07:44

I think there's hockey pre um pre-Stanley Cup playoffs, and that's what they're all watching tonight.

Sid Tobias4:07:51

Okay, uh, we're off the hook.

Sid Tobias4:07:53

I think we've got uh down in parks and recreation, and sir, I don't think we've got anything under that at all.

Sid Tobias4:08:01

Uh and then it would be over to you, Councillor McKenzie uh for environment.

Alison MacKenzie4:08:07

Yes, thank you.

Alison MacKenzie4:08:08

Um I don't have much in terms of a chair's report, but I would like to take the opportunity to uh thank staff and as well as the View Royal Climate Coalition uh for their contribution to the most recent newsletter, the spring-summer newsletter.

Alison MacKenzie4:08:25

Um, if you've read it, you'll see that there's a number of articles in there about how we can reduce our impact on climate.

Alison MacKenzie4:08:29

So if you haven't already read it, I suggest you do.

Alison MacKenzie4:08:36

And uh yeah, so thank you.

Alison MacKenzie4:08:39

Um and looking here, I don't see any other items or reports.

Alison MacKenzie4:08:44

So uh that will conclude the environment committee, and I will uh hand it back, or should I just hand it over to Councillor Oh Mattson?

Alison MacKenzie4:08:55

Yes.

Alison MacKenzie4:08:55

Councillor Matson for the Planning Development Engagement Committee.

Ron Mattson4:09:01

And I will pass it on to uh Mayor Tobias.

Sid Tobias4:09:05

Okay, just in case we have a break and connection.

Sid Tobias4:09:08

It comes all the way back to me.

Sid Tobias4:09:09

Okay.

Sid Tobias4:09:10

Uh I I don't I didn't see your chair'm just gonna go right down to staff reports if that's okay with you, Councilor Matson.

Sid Tobias4:09:14

Uh and I think we've got number seven Erskine Lane staff.

Jeff Chow4:09:25

Thank you, Chair.

Jeff Chow4:09:26

This is um uh development permit 202302 for 7 Erskine Lane.

Jeff Chow4:09:32

This is a development permit renewal for a previously approved department building, uh which includes some variances that we'll go into later.

Jeff Chow4:09:42

So the uh the site was was for uh over 50 years a boat yard and an aperture for nine years before that.

Jeff Chow4:09:50

Uh it would rezon to RM3 in accordance with the official community plan uh for mixed residential use in 2020 and a number of covenants were registered to secure road dedication some road improvements and community amenity contributions.

Jeff Chow4:10:07

So in January 2023 okay so development permit was approved uh two years ago it expires in May uh so in January they actually um were able to complete uh resolve all the contaminated site issues with a certificate of compliance uh so the point now we were where they now need to renew that that uh previously approved building uh the building is um 71 units and has a number of has includes three three-bedroom units, two uh 52 bedroom units and one uh four uh four one bedrooms with dens and fourteen one bedroom units.

Jeff Chow4:10:49

Uh it's uh the property is kind of sited on kind of a hilly type structure.

Jeff Chow4:10:58

And uh and despite you know often when you put in underground parking, it it creates a uh it creates uh removal of the trees.

Jeff Chow4:11:08

In this site, the site was previously cleared, uh, but they have made all attempts to preserve kind of the uh kind of a rocky hilltop that's on the uh that's on the uh south end of the site.

Jeff Chow4:11:20

And the uh the uh the the parking would be kind of cut into the slope below that.

Jeff Chow4:11:27

Uh the main change from the originally approved building is is only to some uh some surface material surface cladding and that to change um kind of a ceramic coated uh siding to to a hardy panel which is a cemetitious siding and this is the originally approved material board and this is the uh variation so on the left hand side is what's called uh seroclad type type uh uh type cladding and they would still use that on more kind of the accent features, but um but the areas that were uh panel there would be switched to uh hardy panel, which is the uh we see in the red bubble there with the with the window.

Jeff Chow4:12:14

Um this diagram shows kind of the main elevation changes that you can see from Erskine Lane and uh and also from the main east elevation, which is kind of the uh the main entry to the site.

Jeff Chow4:12:26

Um the the shape of the building is is the same as it was before, um and otherwise looks exactly the same.

Jeff Chow4:12:35

And some counselor members may remember some changes I made to building to actually add more windows to the to the site to sort of break up uh blank walls.

Jeff Chow4:12:46

Uh so the main considerations are are how the development proposal compliance complies with the development permit area guidelines, how it complies with the zoning, and um and what they need to do to meet servicing requirements.

Jeff Chow4:13:00

In general, the the proposal complies with the intensive mixed use development permit area that applies to the site.

Jeff Chow4:13:09

The building is not a small building, but they step it up with the slope.

Jeff Chow4:13:30

call for uh in terms of zoning it in uh it most it complies with the zone except with a number of items that relate to uh building height setbacks projections retaining wall height so the way building height is measured is measured from the average grade so when you're when you are a uh a building on a slope um the the average run the building it gets gets is uh is kind of lowered so in this case um it is a you know five kind of six story building at one point but that's because it's on a hill it's actually kind of two kind of four story sections put together so it steps up the hill from from Erskine Lane.

Jeff Chow4:14:17

And that's and because because the low end of the building is lower, it lows as the average average grade and hence the uh building height uh is requested but essentially it's it's uh four stories of building over top of uh underground parking uh number of other setback variances are requested and these mostly have to do with a rectangular building on a site that's not rectangular so there's a number of projections uh the front line setback um uh there's uh there's some posts that go go down at the front entrance and the rear line lot line because there's kind of a it's a bit of an angle um there's a uh there's a bit of a wall extrusion that requires a very small variance so we're talking variances of 0.7 meters and 0.5 meters.

Jeff Chow4:15:04

They're fairly minor uh building projections again because the uh the the uh the zoning by wall requires um projections to be a certain width.

Jeff Chow4:15:17

Uh usually it's you know to with permit smaller balconies.

Jeff Chow4:15:20

In this case, it's to allow uh a roof overhang and uh some balcony projections at the rear of the building.

Jeff Chow4:15:26

Those are locations where there's no you know uh no residences adjacent to those locations.

Jeff Chow4:15:32

And again, the variances are not not significant in terms of the extent.

Jeff Chow4:15:37

Uh variance is requested with the height of a retaining wall, and that has to do with um again the building being built into a slope.

Jeff Chow4:15:44

Uh the the the driveway into the underground parking uh is parallel to the slope and kind of um so this retaining wall that you sort of see here is um um is uh requires a variance.

Jeff Chow4:15:59

So I'm just gonna try to use my mouse here.

Jeff Chow4:15:59

And that's so this kind of a it's a wall there.

Jeff Chow4:16:03

So it will be uh screened with vegetation and there's kind of a safety railing on top.

Jeff Chow4:16:07

Uh the variance is to increase it from two meters to um actually uh three, I should say 3.4 meters.

Jeff Chow4:16:19

The uh the final variance is are for servicing and that has to do with uh in terms of uh frontage um frontage requirements.

Jeff Chow4:16:28

Uh in this type of for this type of building you usually have sidewalk and then some pocket parking.

Jeff Chow4:16:34

In this case, as part of the rezoning, they were they kind of relocated some of the uh the parking into a parking island at the end of the cul-de-sac.

Jeff Chow4:16:43

This uh this proposal wouldn't basically enlarge the cul-de-sac and create this parking island in the middle.

Jeff Chow4:16:49

And that's kind of something that's you know that different from what the bylaw requires.

Jeff Chow4:16:53

So a variance is required for that.

Jeff Chow4:16:55

The other variance is for a potential bike lane on the front edge of the property.

Jeff Chow4:16:59

Uh at this point, a design has not been finalized.

Jeff Chow4:17:02

Uh there will be kind of a bike lane that goes from the site up to uh Watkins Way.

Jeff Chow4:17:09

Um the question would be whether it's really needed along the front edge of this site because it's to the left of the parking island where the uh galloping goose kind of comes in.

Jeff Chow4:17:19

So there may or may not be a need for that for uh a kind of a um a dedicated bike lane, but uh this would allow for that possibility.

Jeff Chow4:17:29

So in general, the uh the building is the same as what was previously approved.

Jeff Chow4:17:35

Uh there's a minor change to uh some of the surface material, uh climbing material, but uh overall the variances are the same as before.

Jeff Chow4:17:43

It is they're fairly minor, and there's kind of a site uh constraints that kind of create the need for those uh those variances.

Jeff Chow4:17:51

So the recommendation is to receive the reports.

Jeff Chow4:17:54

Uh if there's any questions from the committee, the uh the applicant is uh is available to help answer questions.

Jeff Chow4:18:01

Thank you.

Sid Tobias4:18:02

Uh so this is something that had submitted a uh a permit for that that lapsed, is that correct?

Jeff Chow4:18:11

It expires in May, so they need to renew it.

Sid Tobias4:18:15

So is there a reason expired?

Jeff Chow4:18:19

Yes, so development permits are only valid for two years.

Jeff Chow4:18:22

So that that clock has run out and because of if they've been dealing with some site contamination issues, that took the uh it was not finished until January.

Sid Tobias4:18:32

So and is this going to be apartments or condos or what's the intent of it?

Jeff Chow4:18:37

Uh my understanding is to be condominiums so they will be sold.

Jeff Chow4:18:41

And um this is a yeah what there's yeah, but uh that but that may or may not be the case, I don't know.

Sid Tobias4:18:51

So we we don't know what it's designed for?

Jeff Chow4:18:54

It's a multifamily building uh and we don't regulate the tenure of it, but uh that may or may not change.

Jeff Chow4:18:59

But what we're applying approved considering tonight is what's being built.

Jeff Chow4:19:05

It's a department building, whether it's rental or owned.

Sid Tobias4:19:09

Yes.

Sid Tobias4:19:10

And um so is there a plan to connect this by sidewalk on Erskine as well?

Jeff Chow4:19:16

Um through the chair, yes.

Jeff Chow4:19:18

So there would be a sidewalk on the front of the property, and this will connect to the next property at um at 9 Erskine.

Sid Tobias4:19:25

And uh accompanying traffic study was that submitted as part of an overall?

Jeff Chow4:19:30

Uh yes.

Jeff Chow4:19:31

So this was this actually this application predated a lot of the other uh the other application next door.

Jeff Chow4:19:37

Um and the all every every rezoning that was made, we the traffic study was done that kind of um considered all the developments on the street.

Speaker_Unknown4:19:46

Okay.

Sid Tobias4:19:47

Counselors, questions?

Sid Tobias4:19:49

Uh Councilor Lemlin, Councilor Brent.

Gery Lemon4:19:52

Thank you, Jeff.

Gery Lemon4:19:53

Um seems to me this particular property's been on the books for quite some time, long before number nine was, you know, a twinkle in anybody's eye.

Gery Lemon4:20:05

Um and I recall seeing it listed, the land itself listed recently.

Gery Lemon4:20:14

Um and so I'm wondering if the applicant is the same proponent of the original plan.

Jeff Chow4:20:24

Uh I think the uh I believe the agent can probably uh answer that question a bit better than I are correct, it was uh listed for a while, and uh it is it has been sold.

Kevin Klippenstein4:20:45

Um it is the original applicant making this part of the arrangement with the selling of the property was that they had a development permit in place that they could carry forward with.

Kevin Klippenstein4:20:57

So our understanding is that the owners that will the future owners um want this development permit in place so that they can complete the project.

Gery Lemon4:21:09

Okay, thank you.

Gery Lemon4:21:10

So so what we saw a couple a few years ago is what we will see rise.

Kevin Klippenstein4:21:16

Yeah, the the major reason that nothing has happened is because it's taken so long to deal with the soils contamination.

Kevin Klippenstein4:21:26

The soils contamination was finished, I I believe about nine, ten months ago.

Kevin Klippenstein4:21:32

But they couldn't, they didn't, it took that long, it took 10 months for the provincial government to get the certificate to the owner.

Kevin Klippenstein4:21:40

In the meantime, um, you know, prices went up.

Kevin Klippenstein4:21:44

We were asked to take another look, you know, are there any savings without seriously harming the project?

Kevin Klippenstein4:21:49

They really like the project.

Kevin Klippenstein4:21:50

They like the the they like the approach, the mass thing, everything that we did to get it to that point.

Kevin Klippenstein4:21:57

But in the meantime, prices went up, material prices went up, and the market seems to be it might be softening a little bit.

Kevin Klippenstein4:22:04

So they're saying, what can we do to this that um will allow us to move forward and and and maybe take some of that bite out while we while we were just waiting for for that certificate to come.

Kevin Klippenstein4:22:18

So that's really the reason.

Kevin Klippenstein4:22:19

It's mostly a material change on some of the, you know, we decided not to go back and reduce the unit sizes or anything like that.

Kevin Klippenstein4:22:27

And that was their choice.

Kevin Klippenstein4:22:28

We threw out all of those things for them to consider if they had to go uh in and and they decided no, the three-bedroom homes were important to to council, so let's keep those in.

Kevin Klippenstein4:22:39

Let's let's not do something that's gonna take us another year away from making an application and rethink everything but what are some of the moves we can make and that's why we came up with those that we presented in this thank you are you the architect or yes I'm sorry Kevin Klippenstein with VDA architecture okay thank you very much and counselor the trail that goes to the employee parking that's on the uh water right away is that uh in between seven and nine or uh or is it at the end of number nine end of number nine?

Kevin Klippenstein4:23:16

It's not immediately at number seven.

Kevin Klippenstein4:23:21

I thought it was part way through number nine, is it not?

Kevin Klippenstein4:23:25

Yeah.

Kevin Klippenstein4:23:25

That trail.

Kevin Klippenstein4:23:26

In fact, it's quite a ways up there, I believe.

Sid Tobias4:23:29

Councilman Kenzie.

Kevin Klippenstein4:23:30

Thank you.

Sid Tobias4:23:31

Yeah.

Alison MacKenzie4:23:36

Hi, I'm I'm not sure whether it's a staff question or maybe a question for you, but um I read in the report that the design is to step two of the um energy well building step code.

Alison MacKenzie4:23:49

And knowing that there's been change provincially that they're looking to increase that and hopefully in the future view royal will as well.

Alison MacKenzie4:23:58

I wonder if there is any impact on this development and or maybe consideration for um increasing the the level in the step code for this build.

Kevin Klippenstein4:24:08

Um step two is already beyond the basic code, and it's beyond what View royal has requested in their bylaws.

Kevin Klippenstein4:24:14

So I don't believe that there's any intent to go up to step three.

Kevin Klippenstein4:24:22

Step step two isn't increasing.

Kevin Klippenstein4:24:24

I believe what's happening is the province is looking at changing the code in the next edition, or or they could do an amendment partway through that will require a certain level of the step code.

Kevin Klippenstein4:24:36

And that's my understanding of the step code is that they will, as the codes get issued, they are going to take out like right now.

Kevin Klippenstein4:24:44

You don't need to do step code at all.

Kevin Klippenstein4:24:46

You could do effectively, you could call it step zero.

Kevin Klippenstein4:24:50

My hunch is that they will require probably step two when the next building code gets issued.

Kevin Klippenstein4:24:57

That's my hunch, but I don't really know.

Kevin Klippenstein4:24:59

I have nothing to base that on other than what they've told us is their intent, right?

Kevin Klippenstein4:25:06

So thank you.

Alison MacKenzie4:25:08

I think does staff have anything to add to that?

John Rogers4:25:11

Yeah, um, thank you through the chair.

John Rogers4:25:14

So our um at starting the January 1st of this year, uh our building bylaw has been amended.

John Rogers4:25:20

So all new, yeah, so all new buildings must meet step code two.

Kevin Klippenstein4:25:25

Okay, and that is at DP or BP.

Kevin Klippenstein4:25:28

Uh at building permit.

Kevin Klippenstein4:25:29

At building permit.

Kevin Klippenstein4:25:30

So this still has to go through nine months of drawing.

Kevin Klippenstein4:25:32

So the it even if you were if that was just being tabled right now, it would it would have to meet that.

Kevin Klippenstein4:25:38

So it will be step two.

Kevin Klippenstein4:25:39

So we will meet, and if you royal introduces step three, we will have to comply at the time of a building permit application.

Kevin Klippenstein4:25:44

Thank you.

Sid Tobias4:25:51

Thanks, Counselor McKenzie, and just a point, we've we're getting complaints, um a lot of them for the noise from the highway.

Sid Tobias4:25:59

And you're gonna be with an earshot of that.

Sid Tobias4:26:01

Um I don't know, staff, what mitigations we can do, whether it's um windows, uh, but they're complaining whether they're inside or outside right now, because the with the increase of population on the western shore, there's increase of traffic, there's an increase of noise.

Sid Tobias4:26:16

We're building closer to the highway.

Sid Tobias4:26:18

It's a perfect recipe for moving people in that aren't gonna be happy with the noise level.

Sid Tobias4:26:23

So anything you can do, I'm not prescribing anything here to mitigate that, so we don't have angry residents here in two years demanding that we put up a six-foot fence, hoping that will solve the problem on the third floor of the building for highway noise.

Sid Tobias4:26:38

So anything you can do to mitigate that, I'd much appreciate it.

Sid Tobias4:26:44

Councillor Roger.

John Rogers4:26:46

Yeah, thanks.

John Rogers4:26:48

So indeed, um step code um two is is something that we've got on the books now.

John Rogers4:26:55

And um goodness, who knows what we'll do tomorrow.

John Rogers4:26:59

So I'm just kidding.

John Rogers4:27:00

Um, but um I I'm I'm okay with the the um the application carrying on.

John Rogers4:27:08

Um I do like and I appreciate staff um going the extra mile and and pointing out the um the potential bike lane uh because the current um access from Erskine Lane to Galloping Goose is really problematic, both in terms of the slope, uh the sight lines, um, and so forth.

John Rogers4:27:27

So it it seems logical that um it should be moved and and uh thank you for anticipating you know the benefit.

John Rogers4:27:34

Um I'm sure you're gonna have lots of cyclists in this building and and they'll want to have safe egress on on and off the galloping goose.

John Rogers4:27:40

So I I applaud you all for considering that for the cyclists.

John Rogers4:27:44

It's gonna be particularly uh challenging, and I'm really pleased that we've got a bike lane for all those residents um to be able to get up the hill.

John Rogers4:27:51

That was a long fought battle.

Sid Tobias4:27:53

Thank you.

Sid Tobias4:27:54

Thank you.

Sid Tobias4:27:55

Councillor rogers.

Sid Tobias4:27:56

Uh Councilor Lemon, did you have a second no i'm i'm going to uh move staff's recommendation received the report and seconded by councillor brown to call the question all in favor counselor madsen's got a comment yeah no the other the other part was just uh question but just my my comment is i i've never liked this proposal from day one and i think i voted against it constantly uh throughout the process however council chose to approve it and so i don't think there's anything we can do it uh do now to sort of address just the issues i did have at uh throughout the zoning and through the tp process.

Ron Mattson4:28:42

So yeah, I I'll support the motion to uh receive the report.

Sid Tobias4:28:49

Thank you, Councillor Mattson.

Sid Tobias4:28:52

Uh all in favor of receiving a report.

Sid Tobias4:28:55

Any opposed?

Sid Tobias4:28:56

None opposed.

Sid Tobias4:28:57

Motion carries.

Sid Tobias4:28:58

Thank you.

Sid Tobias4:28:59

Next on the agenda is the amendment to CD1 zone comprehensive development.

Sid Tobias4:29:06

And can I pause here just for staff?

Sid Tobias4:29:08

Um, Jeff, some of the comments you made that there was no differentiation between apartments and co-ops.

Sid Tobias4:29:14

I'd like to see what we can do, or uh apartments and uh and condos, I'd like to see what we can do to tease that apart.

Sid Tobias4:29:21

And here's why.

Sid Tobias4:29:23

Um, is that if anybody's been watching the news, the mayor and council and staff are going to be responsible increasingly to the provincial government's oversight into our zoning.

Sid Tobias4:29:29

That's coming.

Sid Tobias4:29:37

Um and I need to know what we're building.

Sid Tobias4:29:40

As a matter of fact, right now, I don't know how many apartment build apartment units we've approved that are under construction right now, or condos, or if they've changed.

Sid Tobias4:29:51

So if we're gonna do an adequate assessment of our housing, I need to know what's a condo and what's an apartment.

Sid Tobias4:29:59

And the difference is this: when we're doing taxes uh taxes up, uh and I'm getting taxed, or we're getting taxes from a building plus land, that's a whole lot different than a condo um times 50 on a hunk of land to distribute that amongst residents for tax income.

Sid Tobias4:30:22

So uh that those are some of the things I'd like to know.

Sid Tobias4:30:26

Like before we have our next meeting, I'd love to say, and I've asked for this before, I'm gonna demand it now.

Sid Tobias4:30:32

Well, what do we got in flight?

Sid Tobias4:30:34

Like, what's being built right now?

Sid Tobias4:30:35

What's been approved?

Sid Tobias4:30:36

What's groundbroken, so that we can, when a proposal comes up to us, we can say, is that a priority right now?

Sid Tobias4:30:44

Is that affordable housing?

Sid Tobias4:30:45

Is that market price?

Sid Tobias4:30:47

Is that a condo?

Sid Tobias4:30:48

Can somebody own that?

Sid Tobias4:30:49

Um, just to help us out along, uh, because I'm sure that you know the previous council would like to be reminded too of the sum of the everything that we've got helps guide us when we make new decisions.

Sid Tobias4:30:59

Does that help?

Sid Tobias4:30:59

Thank you, Jeff.

Ron Mattson4:31:06

Uh Counselor Matson.

Ron Mattson4:31:08

Yeah, I I I guess I just wanted to point out that is something we had previously requested.

Ron Mattson4:31:13

Um, just a simple report to be put on to uh all committee, the whole meetings as reminders of where we are and where we're going with some of these projects.

Sid Tobias4:31:26

Yeah, and it's okay if it's status, and I'm I'm looking for very little staff work.

Sid Tobias4:31:31

Picture the site that's recent, uh, how many units were were there?

Sid Tobias4:31:35

What type of it was?

Sid Tobias4:31:37

Where are we on the bar graph of completion to end state?

Sid Tobias4:31:41

And just a whiz through our major ones.

Sid Tobias4:31:43

I'm not talking about a home rent out here.

Sid Tobias4:31:44

Kim.

Sid Tobias4:31:45

I'm just talking about the major holes in the crowd that we've got.

Kim Anema4:31:49

Um your comment earlier about taxes on the building versus no taxes on land.

Kim Anema4:31:56

I'm not sure where that comes from.

Kim Anema4:31:59

In circumstances where it's a condo, the common property is taxed in the name of the strata.

Kim Anema4:32:05

And in terms of condos, the individual units are taxed on the basis of the owners of those units.

Kim Anema4:32:10

So in a condo situation, land and improvements are all taxed.

Kim Anema4:32:15

The same applies in in apartments.

Kim Anema4:32:17

The building and land is all taxed in the name of the owner.

Sid Tobias4:32:23

And how uh in the in the name of the owner, is that individual?

Sid Tobias4:32:26

Counselor Matson.

Sid Tobias4:32:33

Oh, he was there for a second.

Sid Tobias4:32:38

So is that uh the the taxes per unit for a condo not a thing, Kim?

Kim Anema4:32:45

Well the taxes are are um charged to each individual owner in condo situations, and for apartment blocks the taxes are done in the name of the owner of the apartment complex.

Kim Anema4:33:00

But in all cases, land and improvements are taxed.

Sid Tobias4:33:05

No, I wasn't alluding that one would be um one would be they would be equivalent.

Sid Tobias4:33:10

I was saying that they'd probably be different.

Sid Tobias4:33:12

Counselor Matson.

Ron Mattson4:33:13

Uh I guess that was my question.

Ron Mattson4:33:16

I just wanted to know if you had this building, whether it was uh condos or apartments, would there be a significant difference in the assessment?

Sid Tobias4:33:29

And that is at the heart of my when you're factor both things together, Kim, if something was the same building, a condo right beside it, it was apartments.

Sid Tobias4:33:39

What is the difference in tax rates that we would get from the town normally?

Kim Anema4:33:44

Both situations involve market value assessments.

Kim Anema4:33:48

So the driver in terms of valuation is market value.

Kim Anema4:33:51

And the driver in terms of tax rates is is the tax rates that you set.

Kim Anema4:33:58

So there's very little difference of the same principles applied to both situations.

Sid Tobias4:34:06

Okay, I'll make it real clear.

Sid Tobias4:34:09

Market's the same, the the the identical buildings, same number of units in it.

Sid Tobias4:34:15

They've got both got 50 units in it.

Sid Tobias4:34:18

And you're taxing an apartment building or a condo.

Sid Tobias4:34:22

And I'm talking about the total taxes that you're getting back.

Sid Tobias4:34:30

Market being the same for both of them.

Kim Anema4:34:32

I suspect that the market is not the same for both of them.

Kim Anema4:34:36

The um basis of valuation for market of a um apartment would likely be more uh a present value of future cash flow.

Kim Anema4:34:47

A condominium is sales and comparable sales.

Kim Anema4:34:53

So the methodology in establishing market value will be somewhat different.

Sid Tobias4:35:03

Thanks, Kim.

Sid Tobias4:35:08

And I think we've gone through the developers.

Sid Tobias4:35:11

I think we're at CD1 zone comprehensive development.

Sterling Scory4:35:24

Uh Sterling Scorpio Community Planner.

Sterling Scory4:35:27

Uh, I don't have a presentation tonight.

Sterling Scory4:35:28

I do have a report that uh the committee should have uh been able to review.

Sterling Scory4:35:29

Um there are two recommendations for the committee.

Sterling Scory4:35:36

Um the first is to uh recommend to council, so the committee recommend to council that staff uh finalize zoning bylaw uh amendment uh sorry, zoning bylaw number 900 2014, amendment bylaw number 1117 for first, second, and third reading.

Sterling Scory4:35:54

And then the second uh is to wait the public hearing requirement uh in accordance with the local government act, uh, section 464 uh subsection two uh as the proposed zoning bylaw amendment is consistent with the official community plan.

Sterling Scory4:36:10

The uh amendment in question is a uh a technical change to the existing CD1 zone, changing uh the listed use, uh which is listed as light manufacturing medical clinic, and instead listing it as two separate uses, light manufacturing and then uh medical clinic below, uh and review of the bylaw staff noticed that there was uh this this listing uh which appears to be error uh looking back through the uh the previous uh draft for what is what we have now is the uh the zoning bylaw for uh number nine nine hundred in twenty fourteen uh appears to have been adopted um with with uh this this error.

Gery Lemon4:36:58

Uh there is no definition of of medical or sorry light manufacturing medical clinic there is it's uh a definition for each of those uses uh uh listed uh separately uh council then yeah um sterling is it is uh the cd one specific to the three pro um three properties identified on the in your report and nowhere else.

Sterling Scory4:37:32

Through the chair, correct.

Sterling Scory4:37:33

That is correct.

Sterling Scory4:37:34

Uh the three affected properties uh that are listed as cd one is limited to 1511 admirals road, 100 alder smith Place, and 1495 Admirals Road.

Speaker_Unknown4:37:47

Okay.

Gery Lemon4:37:48

That's it.

Sterling Scory4:37:49

That's correct.

Sterling Scory4:37:49

Good, thank you.

Sid Tobias4:37:53

So it was light manufacturing medical clinic.

Sid Tobias4:37:59

So that's a drug lab?

Sid Tobias4:38:01

What is that?

Sterling Scory4:38:02

To to the chair, it it is unclear what was uh intended with that.

Sterling Scory4:38:06

That is why staff in the review of the uh the draft bylaw um suspect that it was either a uh combination of potentially copy paste error or uh deletion error.

Sterling Scory4:38:19

Um this can happen when you're working with Word document files.

Sterling Scory4:38:24

Um it's uh it's been there since the adoption of the bylaw and was just happened to be noticed good thank you starling good catch uh any other comment all in favor of the amendment not opposed motion carries thanks and i think did we move first to third that's what i'm just uh checking now i think we but i'm sorry, I guess that's council, so my mistake.

Sid Tobias4:39:03

Yeah, we just we just received.

Sid Tobias4:39:06

Um so now it's uh finalized zoning bylaw and amendment for first, second, and third reading.

Sid Tobias4:39:14

And then uh waiving the public hearing because it was a typo.

Sid Tobias4:39:15

So that that's forthcoming, correct?

Sid Tobias4:39:17

Yeah, that's what's coming next.

Sid Tobias4:39:24

Uh with that.

Sid Tobias4:39:26

Okay.

Sid Tobias4:39:27

Uh I think that's everything else down here, and just over to you, Councilor Rogers for transportation and public works.

John Rogers4:39:36

Yes, thanks.

John Rogers4:39:37

Uh I'll just uh as a chair's report, I I just want to point out that um um I see that both the Squamalt and Sanach are uh looking to lower their speed limits in neighborhoods from fifty to thirty kilometers.

John Rogers4:39:49

I note that that was also in the Active Transportation's uh conditions report and PRIAC is recommending that and coming to uh to council next week, I think.

John Rogers4:39:58

So uh really pleased to see there's coordination in that regard.

John Rogers4:40:02

Um I guess also a comment with respect to the provinces um uh announcement of um uh housing proposals of um uh converting large lots to four units and um it it dawned on me that this was going to have a very interesting and and quite a significant impact on uh the town's infrastructure particularly um with um roads and and sidewalks we uh if they if the uh harbors any uh indication um the number of um vehicles, people going to school, um so forth, um our sidewalk master plan, which was scheduled for 10 years out, probably gonna be five years out if this uh takes hold and and we have to contend with it.

John Rogers4:40:50

So it's a really a good thing that we do have this um uh active transportation plan and and uh planning to get a detailed sidewalks uh um uh initiative underway.

John Rogers4:41:01

And with that, I will uh turn it over to staff for the Active Transportation Network presentation.

Sid Tobias4:41:18

Thank you, Chair.

Ivan Leung4:41:19

Um I'm the young, Director of Engineering.

Ivan Leung4:41:20

I'll just do a brief introduction before I pass it on to my colleague uh Tim Shaw from Watt Consulting.

Ivan Leung4:41:25

So um we're here to present or do a presentation on our draft active transportation network plan.

Ivan Leung4:41:29

Our consultant will present the findings and question period after.

Ivan Leung4:41:35

Just a few things I wanted to emphasize, something for the committee to think about when this presentation is being presented to you.

Ivan Leung4:41:45

Active transportation network plans are aspirational in nature.

Ivan Leung4:41:50

They identify barriers, show needs.

Ivan Leung4:42:00

Look at the long term.

Ivan Leung4:42:02

Active transformation plans do not try to pin down one particular solution.

Ivan Leung4:42:07

It provides a toolbox, it provides options for us to consider.

Ivan Leung4:42:11

Should there be a change in needs or a change in uh or a pivot in our in our neighbors and what they wish to do?

Ivan Leung4:42:17

The active transportation network plan allows us to pivot along with it.

Ivan Leung4:42:22

And lastly, active transportation network plans are living documents.

Ivan Leung4:42:25

They're meant to be updated and change depending on the needs of the community and the neighboring communities.

Ivan Leung4:42:44

In order for us to meaningfully respond, uh, we will be doing that for next week's council for your consideration.

Ivan Leung4:42:53

Um, at this time, though, uh I'll have I'll pass the the reins on to Mr.

Ivan Leung4:42:58

Shaw here, and um any questions, high-level questions with respect to the active transportation.

Ivan Leung4:42:59

So without further ado, Tim.

Ivan Leung4:43:03

Certainly we're here to help you.

Ivan Leung4:43:07

So this should be forward, goes back.

Sid Tobias4:43:12

Yeah.

Sid Tobias4:43:20

Good evening.

Tim Shaw4:43:21

Thank you, Ivan, for the introduction, and good evening, Mayor and Council.

Tim Shaw4:43:24

Good to see everyone.

Tim Shaw4:43:25

I'm very pleased to be here this evening to uh present a fairly high-level overview of the Active Transportation Uh Network Plan, which I uh we've uh had the pleasure of putting together for the town, and look forward to providing a fairly high-level uh overview of uh of the plan this evening.

Tim Shaw4:43:44

So I'll take about 15 minutes or so to go over the plan, and then as Mr.

Tim Shaw4:43:51

Leong mentioned, uh we can discuss uh some of the details in the QA.

Tim Shaw4:43:55

So as far as the agenda goes, uh we've got start off with just high-level project overview, uh touch on the engagement feedback uh in the plan, uh, the plan framework, uh, the ultimate networks and what those are all about, uh, and then the short-term priority projects, programs and policies, and then uh QA.

Tim Shaw4:44:15

So, as far as the project overview, really at a high level, this is the town's first comprehensive document that provides a 10-year roadmap outlining the short-term infrastructure improvements, uh, the policies and programs needed to prioritize active transportation in in V Royal.

Tim Shaw4:44:30

Key objective all along, right from the start of this plan is to identify gaps in the network and the priorities needed to address those gaps.

Tim Shaw4:44:37

As you can see in the timeline at the bottom of the slide there, it was a year-long process.

Tim Shaw4:44:44

A lot of engagement.

Tim Shaw4:44:45

I mean, starting off with the first phase in March of 2022, we did a detailed baseline conditions report looking at the barriers, all the different barriers in the active transportation network, and some of the different different challenges and different opportunities that could be explored through the planning process.

Tim Shaw4:45:01

Then we validate validated that and sort of substantiated it with uh with the public engagement process in phase two.

Tim Shaw4:45:08

Uh that was last spring summer, where we went to the public uh through an online survey, an ideas fair, and then also key stakeholder interviews to get uh again a better sense of what those barriers are in the network uh to help sort of corroborate what we found in our baseline conditions review.

Tim Shaw4:45:23

And then third phase, so June to December, a lot of the technical work was done, network analyses, uh coming off the preliminary opportunities and recommendations, bring that back to the community uh through this the second online survey and also uh bike shops that we did as well to sort of get sort of test those and get feedback from the public on whether we're going in the right direction.

Tim Shaw4:45:43

And then phase four and five that's sort of the the first half of our first quarter of 2023.

Tim Shaw4:45:48

We've drafted the plan uh and the implementation uh strategy, and then we had our open house last week, where we presented it, and then here we are uh in uh tonight in front of council.

Tim Shaw4:45:58

So those are the five phases of this year-long process.

Tim Shaw4:46:02

So as far as the engagement that we've done this project, and I should also note we have two detailed what we heard engagement summaries that are available online.

Tim Shaw4:46:11

We also summarized the engagement process and the draft plan.

Tim Shaw4:46:13

So at a very high level on this slide, what you see here is engagement by the numbers.

Tim Shaw4:46:18

We've had over 700 survey responses between the first between the first and the second survey.

Tim Shaw4:46:31

And then, of course, last week we had the open house where we had roughly 50 to 60 participants.

Tim Shaw4:46:36

Some people forgot to sign in.

Tim Shaw4:46:38

So it's uh it is an estimate.

Tim Shaw4:46:40

Um, so what came from the first round of engagement, uh just some key themes you see there on the on the slide, in terms of what the public uh uh identified as desired improvements, filling in gaps in the network uh is critical, more separation from motor vehicle traffic, that's more separation for pedestrian and cycling facilities from motor vehicle traffic, uh, greater protection for uh uh pedestrians with a focus on all ages and abilities, and safer routes to school uh for children.

Tim Shaw4:47:09

Uh this slide here is just showing a uh the photo from from the open house that was held eight eight days ago, uh April 3rd.

Tim Shaw4:47:16

Um hard to summarize all the feedback.

Tim Shaw4:47:19

Feedback is quite varied uh from that evening, but uh some of the repeating themes that we saw, and we have what we should uh have up on the slide here, in terms of what we heard, uh concern with multi-use pathways due to user conflicts between people rolling, biking, walking, et cetera.

Tim Shaw4:47:29

Future infrastructure improvements should protect tree canopy where possible.

Tim Shaw4:47:37

I guess the idea is just recognizing that you know urban forestation, urban trees can help mitigate climate impacts.

Tim Shaw4:47:44

Slip lanes and channelized right turns should be removed, which is very much in line with best practices.

Tim Shaw4:47:49

They're horrible for pedestrians and cyclists, and they should be removed everywhere, but they are quite costly to do.

Tim Shaw4:47:54

So we kind of have to uh sort of small steps in that regard, and we have direction on that in the plan.

Tim Shaw4:47:59

And then uh need to slow down vehicles in general, just to overall improve uh safety and comfort for people walking, cycling, and rolling.

Tim Shaw4:48:07

So, again, those are just some of the key theme, key themes that came out of that open house uh last week.

Tim Shaw4:48:13

So, as far as the plan framework goes, we came up with a vision, uh, a vision statement that's on the slide here.

Tim Shaw4:48:14

And I just want to be very clear the plan we've developed is not a 25-year plan, it's a 10-year plan because we believe that uh things in the transportation world, especially, things change overnight.

Tim Shaw4:48:18

So it's a 10-year vision.

Tim Shaw4:48:29

So the idea is that this is a 10-year plan to identify the critical improvements that are needed, uh, and the plan should be revisited every five years to sort of check uh and monitor where things are at and sort of revisit some of the priorities.

Tim Shaw4:48:41

So the vision statement here, I'm not gonna read it, it's a bit of a mouthful, but essentially what the vision statement is getting at is that um uh the future active transportation network uh in View Oil uh it really is one that connects neighborhoods, so it's connecting residents to all the key destinations that schools, uh employment destinations, natural environments, parks, green spaces, trails, and also the neighboring communities as they build their active transportation networks.

Tim Shaw4:49:06

Once View Royal achieves that sort of complete and connected network, that's really when you're gonna start to move the needle on active transportation.

Tim Shaw4:49:15

You're gonna start to see more people walking, cycling, rolling, and that's gonna help reduce emissions, boost the local economy, and enhance overall resilience.

Tim Shaw4:49:22

So that's all more or less captured in this vision statement.

Tim Shaw4:49:25

Um, but it's obviously intended to be aspirational in nature.

Tim Shaw4:49:30

We came up with four objectives.

Tim Shaw4:49:32

We really wanted them to be as measurable uh as possible, uh quantitative, so you can really track how well uh the the town is sort of meeting its vision and how well it's doing in terms of its overall network.

Tim Shaw4:49:44

The first one here is the culture of active transportation.

Tim Shaw4:49:44

So four objectives.

Tim Shaw4:49:48

What you see below that is a number of targets that the town could could follow and monitor.

Tim Shaw4:49:52

So just a couple examples, achieving the mode share target of 25% of all trips to work and school by an active mode, and achieving the climate target of a 36% reduction in emissions below 2007 levels.

Tim Shaw4:50:05

Objective two, all ages and abilities facilities, a number of different targets there, one being you know a physically protected uh cycling facility that's built on one, at least one east-west corridor and one north-south corridor.

Tim Shaw4:50:20

And we've also we have one on you know, all upgrades to the major intersections should be designed to be universally accessible in line with the BC Active Transportation Design Guide.

Tim Shaw4:50:29

So regional trails.

Tim Shaw4:50:31

Objective three here local and community connections.

Tim Shaw4:50:34

We know we all know how important the regional trails are in View Royal and connections to them.

Tim Shaw4:50:38

So the regional trails are accessible by all ages and abilities facilities, as an example of the target.

Tim Shaw4:50:44

And then objective number four, regional connections.

Tim Shaw4:50:46

This one's really important as well.

Tim Shaw4:50:47

All regional trail crossings are designed to the same standard, which of course is going to require coordination with the CRD, which we outline in our plan.

Tim Shaw4:50:54

And all active transportation connections to neighboring jurisdictions must be coordinated and conform to all ages and ability standards.

Tim Shaw4:51:01

That one's critical too, because we know View Royal is surrounded by Culwood and Esquimalt and Sanach, all of all of which are building their network.

Tim Shaw4:51:08

So there's a really good opportunity for coordination in this regard.

Tim Shaw4:51:13

So the ultimate networks.

Tim Shaw4:51:14

Just want to be really clear about this because I think there's some confusion about what the intent is of the ultimate networks.

Tim Shaw4:51:21

The ultimate networks are beyond the 10-year planning horizon of this plan.

Tim Shaw4:51:25

We've included them in line with what Mr.

Tim Shaw4:51:28

Mr.

Tim Shaw4:51:28

Leung said about sort of the plan being aspirational.

Tim Shaw4:51:31

So what we so the ultimate networks are really meant to provide that sort of long term vision for how the network, both the pedestrian network and selecting network, can be more complete and connected to make it really easy for people to get around.

Tim Shaw4:51:44

How we came up with the ultimate networks, the baseline conditions analysis.

Tim Shaw4:51:48

So we dove into the data, did the analysis to understand again those barriers and where the gaps are.

Tim Shaw4:51:54

We went through a public engagement process and we did a transportation needs assessment, which is a detailed GIS analysis, essentially looking at a number of criteria to identify where there's highest need for a pedestrian and cycling facility.

Tim Shaw4:52:08

And how we did that, in terms of the criteria, which you can see on the slide there, the pedestrian network, we looked at things like roads with high traffic, speeds and volumes, connections to schools, sidewalks in or near future areas slated for growth, sidewalks in proximity to lower income areas, because there's an equity aspect to this plan.

Tim Shaw4:52:25

Connections to bus stops, connections to parks, connections to trails.

Tim Shaw4:52:28

And we use the same criteria essentially for the cycling network or the cycling needs assessment, except for that we also included Strava data, which provides some indication of where cycling activity is in the network.

Tim Shaw4:52:39

So we want to want to be very clear about that, that.

Tim Shaw4:52:42

That the needs assessment was a data-driven GIS analysis to figure out where those needs are, and then backed by public engagement results.

Tim Shaw4:52:51

So what you see here is the ultimate pedestrian network just at a very high level.

Tim Shaw4:53:00

It's the darker green lines, apologies might be hard to see, but essentially the thicker dark green lines are the what we're calling pedestrian facility upgrades.

Tim Shaw4:53:08

So what this refers to is essentially the town cannot build a sidewalk in every road.

Tim Shaw4:53:13

A, that's cost prohibitive prohibitive, and B, it's not even necessary based on our uh uh uh our judgment.

Tim Shaw4:53:21

So what we're saying here is that the roads we've identified for that for a pedestrian facility upgrade are ones that can be built to a higher standard.

Tim Shaw4:53:29

Uh all ages and abilities.

Tim Shaw4:53:30

So if that's a for example, a non-separated sidewalk that's right that's next to a major road, uh, so uh picture you know parts of Island Highway, um, that could be upgraded to a separated sidewalk.

Tim Shaw4:53:41

So there's more of a buffer between the motor vehicle travel lane and the pedestrian facility.

Tim Shaw4:53:45

Uh and the same goes with multi-use pathways, so on and so forth.

Tim Shaw4:53:48

So I just want to be really clear about that.

Tim Shaw4:53:49

It's upgrading what you have to a higher standard to make it easier for people to walk around.

Tim Shaw4:53:54

Uh what this what this also shows is the pedestrian cyclist overpasses.

Tim Shaw4:54:00

Uh uh those sort of yellow, yellow uh dots uh might be hard to see.

Tim Shaw4:54:05

Those are also meant to be aspirational.

Tim Shaw4:54:07

This came from public feedback, it came from our own analysis about where those overpasses could be to help address the divide of the Trans Canada Highway, which divides the North View Royal and South View Royal.

Tim Shaw4:54:14

That came across loud and clear in the public engagement process.

Tim Shaw4:54:21

So we are aware that these those are large scale infrastructure projects that might take years to realize, but we wanted to show them on the map again as part of an aspirational sort of future network.

Tim Shaw4:54:33

Um cycling network, uh, same story.

Tim Shaw4:54:36

Uh here though we're showing again all the different connections that are needed uh throughout the community.

Tim Shaw4:54:41

I think the clue the big take home for this one is that we've also identified those connections that are needed to the neighboring jurisdictions, right?

Tim Shaw4:54:48

So Calwood to the to the south and Sanish to the north, Esquimalt uh uh to the to the east, uh, filling in those connections to make sure there's sort of good connectivity between those communities.

Tim Shaw4:55:00

So as far as the short-term priority projects, um so what we came across what we came up with based on the uh baseline conditions analysis, the public engagement, the transportation needs and assessment that I just just described, we came up with, and working very closely with staff, three critical corridor projects that we believe can that are are needed in the community as a first step to start to actually build the active transportation network to an all-ages and ability standard.

Tim Shaw4:55:33

So the first one, yeah, we see on the screen here is Averalls Road from Island Highway to Hallowell Road.

Tim Shaw4:55:38

Again, at a very high level, what you see here is uh essentially sidewalk on the on the on the east side, sidewalk on the west side, and then removing a southbound travel lane and putting in a either bidirectional protected bike facility or a multi-use pathway.

Tim Shaw4:55:54

The plan is not overly prescriptive on what the facility type should be.

Tim Shaw4:55:58

That's not the intent of an AT plan.

Tim Shaw4:56:00

The intent is to identify the need for an improvement, and then detailed design could get into some of those specifics in terms of what's the right facility type.

Tim Shaw4:56:08

Just want to be clear about that.

Tim Shaw4:56:09

So we presented that to the community in the second online survey, and what we found, we heard is most respondents were supportive of this proposed of these proposed improvements along Abril's.

Tim Shaw4:56:21

45% strongly support, 27% support.

Tim Shaw4:56:24

Bike shop participants also identified Amarill's Road as one of the most unsafe in the in the overall network in the town.

Tim Shaw4:56:31

And then we also heard loud and clear in the survey that there, while there's support for these improvements, there's also concerns about the removal of southbound traveling and what that can do to the traffic, traffic operations, the road network.

Tim Shaw4:56:42

So, of course, there's trade-offs.

Tim Shaw4:56:44

There's always trade-offs in transportation, and that's something that the town's gonna have to work through with the ministry and neighboring jurisdictions if this project gets gets pursued.

Tim Shaw4:56:52

And the price tag for that is 3.7 million in terms of a class B cost estimate.

Tim Shaw4:56:58

Um Island Highway, ENN rail trail to Admirals Road, just in short, uh also presented to the community in the second online survey to gauge level of support and preferences.

Tim Shaw4:57:07

Over 80% uh were supportive.

Tim Shaw4:57:10

Um bike shop participants also supportive of it because of the connectivity to the ENN rail trail and also to Shoreline Community Middle School.

Tim Shaw4:57:18

And the cost estimate again for this is 300 and 335,000 approximately.

Tim Shaw4:57:26

Last one here, critical corridor projects.

Tim Shaw4:57:28

The third one is the Helmakin Interchange, which we heard about earlier, earlier tonight.

Tim Shaw4:57:32

This one really came up in the public engagement process again as sort of the main divide or one way that's dividing the community in terms of north and south.

Tim Shaw4:57:43

In the online survey, we heard support for this particular uh these improvements, which essentially is showing might be hard to see, but removing the southbound travel lane, replacing that with uh bi-directional protected bike lane or a multi-use pathway to really make it easy to get for people to get all the way to Watkis, or you know, to whether it's Eagle Creek or uh the hospital, uh, making sure there's there's a safe facility there.

Tim Shaw4:58:06

Um as I mentioned in the first round of engagement, uh the interchange was identified as a major gap in the network.

Tim Shaw4:58:13

Uh and similar to Admiral's Road, there were concerns expressed to us in the survey about how putting in a facility on the interchange, which by the way is going to require a lot of coordination with MOTI, so we're not uh we're not oblivious to that.

Tim Shaw4:58:25

Uh, concerns that removing that travel lane could also impact traffic operations in the road network.

Tim Shaw4:58:31

Uh, this so last few slides here.

Tim Shaw4:58:34

So, this is showing uh the other 10 short-term priority projects, infrastructure projects that we came up with.

Tim Shaw4:58:39

The point of this map is just to show you that again, through our careful transportation needs analysis and engagement, we've we've been able to identify projects that sort of serve different areas or pockets of U oil.

Tim Shaw4:58:50

We want to make sure there was good sort of geographic distribution and equity in that regard.

Tim Shaw4:58:56

This slide here is just showing all of the all the projects.

Tim Shaw4:58:59

Of course, the plan has a lot more detail for each one, but you can see in total for these 10 projects, it's over three kilometers of pedestrian and cycling facilities in total, intended for different user groups.

Tim Shaw4:59:09

People who are walking, people on wheelchairs and have other mobility devices, and also people who are cycling.

Tim Shaw4:59:15

So trying to make sure we're we're hitting the balance for different different active transportation users.

Tim Shaw4:59:23

This slide here is just showing the 10 or the 13 short-term priority projects, those three critical corridor ones I mentioned, and then the 10 additional ones for a price tag of about 11 million dollars.

Tim Shaw4:59:32

This is a class D cost estimate, so there's a fairly big uh contingency.

Tim Shaw4:59:37

Um so just it's approximate.

Tim Shaw4:59:39

Uh and then just lastly, the you know, any active transportation plan uh is incomplete without mentioning uh programs, programs and policies.

Tim Shaw4:59:48

The infrastructure is critical, but you also need the education and the culture part to help to help get people uh thinking about um how they can better interact with the network, uh how they can uh better get around the network, uh the you know, uh uh education and and and training for children who might feel uncomfortable, for example, going on their bike.

Tim Shaw5:00:07

So there's a whole whole range of programs and policies we've included in the plan for consideration uh for the town uh that can that can start to uh change the culture of active transportation and uh and help support those infrastructure recommendations that we've come up with.

Tim Shaw5:00:23

Uh so I will leave it at that.

Tim Shaw5:00:26

Thank you very much for your attention and uh happy to answer any questions.

Sid Tobias5:00:30

Thank you.

Sid Tobias5:00:31

No, it was uh it was a really good study, and I went through it a couple of times, and I'm sure it'll change again with some Ivan taking in some comments.

Sid Tobias5:00:38

So here's the struggle a young nerdy mayor that has an electric bike has is um we're already stressed out for traffic now, right?

Sid Tobias5:00:48

From our transportation perspective, and that's only growing.

Sid Tobias5:00:52

Every, you know, whether it's Callwood or West or Soup that's growing, everybody has to come through a view Royal.

Sid Tobias5:00:58

And everything I'm reading for stats is about 5% of people commute by bike to work.

Sid Tobias5:00:59

Right.

Sid Tobias5:01:07

That could go up to 10%, but I guarantee in the second week in January, wasn't nobody going to work on their bike.

Sid Tobias5:01:15

My point is this is that if we're trying to encourage people to get to the highway, to get out of View Royal and get on the highway and go wherever you're going, um, or if they're coming from the base in a squamalt to make it uh either keep on going straight and get to the highway or do old island.

Sid Tobias5:01:35

Um you know, I'm supportive of promoting biking, but I can't support spending that amount of money for making a lot of people mad for making a decision that affects transportation, right?

Sid Tobias5:01:52

In general, and that will slow us down.

Sid Tobias5:01:54

So my my concern with this is that we're kind of prioritizing biking, but we just had, you know, we we've also got mass transit improvements there, thankfully.

Sid Tobias5:02:07

Um, but it's that balance between spending a lot of money uh on on connectors that aren't it would be pretty hard for me to defend getting up in front of a mixed group of commuters to say that this was a good expenditure or we're building it for the future.

Sid Tobias5:02:27

So those are my only concerns, and I would love to see before the final is done is show me what things have to do with safety first.

Sid Tobias5:02:38

Like, where are the places that are truly unsafe and not just for a uh a cyclist properties?

Sid Tobias5:02:47

Like we've talked about that intersection here on the corner of uh uh by Helmkin across Old Island.

Sid Tobias5:02:57

Uh for for folks going across there, they're they're not feeling safe.

Sid Tobias5:03:02

Uh the Helmkin Watkiss Chancellor uh one is pretty unsafe with uh pedestrian light coming on the same time that the advanced turn green has stopped, but it's still green, so people are just turning left and interrupting walks of traffic.

Sid Tobias5:03:22

So if you could provide me with anything, and this is personal talking, provide me with priorities on safety first.

Sid Tobias5:03:31

Like these these patterns need to change.

Sid Tobias5:03:37

Like if I've only got a limited amount of money, number one, what could I invest in to make things safe, safe first, and then the nice to haves kind of after?

Sid Tobias5:03:48

Does that make sense?

Ivan Leung5:03:50

Mayor Tobias, I think it does.

Ivan Leung5:03:52

We can certainly provide a list.

Ivan Leung5:03:54

What it may suggest is that um we attach a a uh like a preface staff report on top of the on the of the actual translation network plan because doing so um preserves the integrity of the static report.

Ivan Leung5:04:10

But um certain council at the end of the day are the ones that helps guide us as to what our priorities are.

Ivan Leung5:04:15

So uh certainly we could probably work on that.

Ivan Leung5:04:18

Um just one one anecdote on uh usage of our transportation facilities.

Ivan Leung5:04:23

I like to I like to picture it as kind of a bell curve.

Ivan Leung5:04:27

So our existing facilities are meant or the the people that are comfortable riding in on the traditional bike lanes that we've seen around are probably the 16.67% on one side of the bell curve.

Ivan Leung5:04:40

And active transportation is trying to expand that to the middle 66.67%.

Ivan Leung5:04:45

And the way to do that is to introduce these infrastructure that are uh more than just what we see today.

Ivan Leung5:04:51

Um a lot of it has to do with safety.

Ivan Leung5:04:55

Uh certainly there are items such as separation of sidewalks that does provide um quite quite a significant safety improvement.

Ivan Leung5:05:02

We've heard that all the a lot a lot of times um from Walcon and I think um from the CNIB as well at the um at the open house.

Ivan Leung5:05:10

So those are they could be quick wins, and we can certainly identify some um some some of the similar lines.

Sid Tobias5:05:20

Oh, sorry, sorry for that.

Sid Tobias5:05:21

I interrupted you as chair.

Sid Tobias5:05:23

That was because I'm used to doing it all the time, Councillor Rogers.

John Rogers5:05:26

You have the butter excellent points, and and thank you for raising them.

Don Brown5:05:29

Yeah, I see lots of stuff for bikes, I see lots of stuff for vehicles.

John Rogers5:05:30

Safety's you know, number one.

John Rogers5:05:32

Uh Councilor Brown.

Don Brown5:05:37

I don't I don't see that much for pedestrians.

Don Brown5:05:39

And I see here the connections to Saanich, to Squimalt, to Callwood, but not to Langford.

Don Brown5:05:46

Uh Atkins Road has great bike packs.

Don Brown5:05:48

You can go down the the E and N to Galloping Goose.

Don Brown5:05:52

Uh it's great, nice trail, beautiful trail linked up.

Don Brown5:05:55

Uh heavily trafficked road, sidewalks or boulevards are this wide, and a lot of people actually do walk to work even in the winter from there.

Don Brown5:06:04

That'll work at the thrifties, for example, in Callwood.

Don Brown5:06:06

They make the trail up walk, and it's totally unsafe.

Don Brown5:06:09

People are cutting through people's private driveways to access the galloping goose off Atkins Road.

Don Brown5:06:14

And people from Chilco, and I live in Atkins Road, we we feel left out in a lot of the stuff that goes on.

Don Brown5:06:20

We almost feel like we're, I don't know, uh uh East Langford.

Don Brown5:06:26

We're left out.

Don Brown5:06:27

And uh I like to see more stuff.

Don Brown5:06:30

It's fine to see the bike stuff, but a lot of the bike stuff's already there.

Don Brown5:06:33

I like to see way more stuff about pedestrians.

Don Brown5:06:36

I walk a lot, and that that road is dangerous.

Don Brown5:06:40

Uh you got a farm down the road where I've seen grandparents taking their grandkids to see the horse and the two cows at the at the end, and this there's no sidewalk there.

Don Brown5:06:48

There's a sidewalk further down the road.

Gery Lemon5:06:50

And going up the hill to Langford when you with the galloping goose crosses, um, there's a concrete barrier there, and it's unsafe so i'd like to see way more um for pedestrian access and and our left out area of town I think thanks to councillor brown council emman yeah um thank you Mr Shaw um I first of all I think it's wonderful that so many people engaged in this and that it's um so so important to so many and most of us were at the open house last week and and it was humming so clearly there's a lot of interest um and and it matters to a lot of people um so you know some of the some of the things I heard might have been just you know kind of specifics but I but I did hear um real concerns about the stretch for example um Hallowell to uh the the Admirals the Admiral stretch from Hallowell to the island highway um of the double laning of the bike lanes and uh the loss the loss of you know kind of a vital corridor so you know you know I I don't want to go all hail to the automobile but it there's it it is a vital route for a huge um huge you're huge part of the em the employed population.

Gery Lemon5:08:19

Uh so I I don't think that's something t taking a a lane away and cutting off that that corner um for you know t turning turning off the Ovid Highway is something we can really do lightly.

Gery Lemon5:08:35

I think that that really needs a real consideration.

Gery Lemon5:08:38

You know, and and uh a few a few years ago there was a V Royal resident that this didn't happen in View Royal.

Gery Lemon5:08:45

It happened just down the road on on Craigflower but there's Beauroyal resident, mom of five, who was killed riding her bike on a you know on a narrow side of road bike lane, um called a bike lane, um at night, you know, it was probably raining, somebody made a turn and and she was gone, and five kids lost their mom.

Gery Lemon5:09:08

Um so you know it's it's not to be minimized the importance of of um adequate adequate um bicycle um laneways.

Gery Lemon5:09:23

Um I think I think we you know we need to do it in in areas that we see that people are going to be using it automatically.

Gery Lemon5:09:34

Um for example, going up.

Gery Lemon5:09:36

I I was surprised that there wasn't something more um thoughtful or just something at all actually, um, going going up um Island Highway to towards Four Mile Hill, coming up from Admirals.

Gery Lemon5:09:54

I I would have thought that that would have been a path that cyclists coming from Esquimalt and coming from you know coming around from from Sanich might be taking.

Gery Lemon5:10:04

So that that just struck me.

Gery Lemon5:10:06

And uh just a just an aside when when we're thinking about you know a double lane uh uh bicycle corridor um you know there's there was a learning curve involved and there still is for a lot of us you'd downtown Victoria when suddenly you know everything you knew was no more and you know you'd you you'd get out of your car and have no idea that there was a chance that you were gonna get hit by a bike.

Gery Lemon5:10:34

And my my husband who is who is you know he's got a handicap, he he very nearly did because suddenly, you know, life had changed.

Gery Lemon5:10:42

And so um and and I too I felt you know in peril once or twice.

Gery Lemon5:10:48

So there's there's a I don't know what you do about that, you know, I don't know what kind of education process, but I think those are all things that need to be considered.

Gery Lemon5:10:57

So you know I an active transportation strategy shouldn't be so active that people get wiped out.

Gery Lemon5:11:03

Um anyway those are just my my off the top of my head thoughts.

Gery Lemon5:11:08

So for now thank you.

John Rogers5:11:12

Uh Council Matchnell we hear you I'm just going to go to Councillor McKenzie first.

John Rogers5:11:16

We see her.

Alison MacKenzie5:11:19

Thank you.

Alison MacKenzie5:11:20

Um so I have a couple questions.

Alison MacKenzie5:11:22

I guess uh my first one was I I did hear a lot uh from the people who attended the open house about the concerns with the multi use paths.

Alison MacKenzie5:11:32

Um and I'm curious whether you know of you know best practices in terms of um kind of to uh counselor lemon's point the education around you know making it safer for pedestrians um such as maybe like signage maybe speed limits I know back in Ottawa there was a dangerous stretch and they actually implemented a bike speed limit there.

Alison MacKenzie5:11:54

So yeah I was just wondering if you could speak to any best practices that you're aware of to help with that through the chair.

Tim Shaw5:12:04

Yeah, thanks, Councillor McKenzie, for that question.

Tim Shaw5:12:08

So I think first off, with multi-use pathways, I think there's also um uh people often point to the Gallup and Goose and the ENN Rail Trail as examples of where there's a lot of user conflicts.

Tim Shaw5:12:14

Those are regional trails that have been around for a while, especially Galloping Goose, where they have significant volumes of users, to the point now where it's so successful that they have to actually widen the trail, which is great to help minimize those conflicts.

Tim Shaw5:12:45

So providing uh more safety for cyclists, but they of course also provide space for pedestrians.

Tim Shaw5:12:50

Where there aren't initially as many conflicts, because you need to have a certain number of uh users to uh hit the certain critical threshold until you start to see those conflicts, which you see on the regional trails.

Tim Shaw5:13:04

But typically you wouldn't see that right away when you put in multi-use pathways, uh roadside multi multi use pathways.

Tim Shaw5:13:11

So I think there's a little bit of concern coming from the regional trails, which I think are not always analogous.

Tim Shaw5:13:16

To answer your question, uh in terms of best practices, the BC Active Transportation Design Guide has uh different um uh has guidance with respect to signage, pavement markings, uh, so actual physical things you can do to alert both pedestrians and people cycling and also rolling that it is truly a shared pathway and you have to watch for other users.

Tim Shaw5:13:37

Doesn't always address the e-bike problem because e-bike users tend to go quite fast, uh, but that's more of a regulatory issue in terms of you know minimizing speeds or or setting a speed limit so they can't travel you know 40 kilometers an hour for example.

Tim Shaw5:13:51

But there's also education as well.

Tim Shaw5:13:53

So it's when that's the whole part of you know with the sort of the supporting supportive policies and programs section of the plan you just put it if you put in infrastructure and and don't tell a story about it or don't educate residents about it, you're gonna have problems, whether it's a protected bike lane in uh in a in a new city or a multi-use pathway.

Tim Shaw5:14:13

You need to inform people about how it works, um, uh, how yielding works, uh, just essentially the rules of the road uh to help make it uh help people understand uh that uh it's it's truly a shared pathway to minimize those conflicts.

Tim Shaw5:14:27

So I hope that answers your question.

Alison MacKenzie5:14:29

Yes, thank you.

Alison MacKenzie5:14:30

Um and then my other question was I've always been curious why the um suggested Maltese path for Old Island Highway along here is on the opposite side, it's on the school side.

Alison MacKenzie5:14:43

Um other than that there's already a more separated sidewalk there.

Alison MacKenzie5:14:48

I was just wondering what the reasoning is since a lot of the amenities such as uh Canadian Tire and all that is on the other side of the road.

Tim Shaw5:14:58

Through the chair, thanks for the thanks for the question.

Tim Shaw5:15:00

That was uh based on I can I can respond first then Mr.

Tim Shaw5:15:04

Lung if you want to add anything but that was based on really what was driving that is just uh the the connection to to the school uh principally so just you know the whole I mentioned earlier uh the need for safe routes to school making it safer for children to get to and from school uh it's also easy access to the ENN rail trail on that side on the on the north side so uh it it also it would uh with with Admirals Road that recommendation it would still allow for a connection so if the Admirals Road uh facilities were to go in on the on the uh west side it would if you're if you have the if you have the facilities on the north side on island highway uh the way it'd be designed this would all happen in detail design it's way beyond the scope of an AT plan, but you would still be able to have that connection.

Tim Shaw5:15:48

So people can come down island highway on the north side and then cross at the intersection to then be on the west side of Admiral's road to get down to Canadian Tire, uh Admiral's walk, etc.

Tim Shaw5:15:59

So um that that was part of part of the reasoning uh for that.

Tim Shaw5:16:00

Other destinations.

Tim Shaw5:16:05

Um but I do want to stress again that uh through the detailed design process things can change in terms of you know where does it make more sense to actually put the facility there's there's there's technical engineering considerations at the intersections for tie-ins and transitions.

Tim Shaw5:16:20

So but I hope that answers your question for now.

Alison MacKenzie5:16:23

Yes uh it does and it kind of addresses or speaks to one of my uh kind of concerns is that with the these proposed new paths it's basically committing us to also changing our intersections because for that path to connect to the um admiral's one we would definitely have to change that so I guess I don't know at what point we would consider the cost of that as well if it would be simultaneous would it yeah uh yeah intersections are high conflict points I would say that's intersections oftentimes do take priority uh it really depends on intersection it depends on your road and it depends on the data that you're that you're basing it off of um for example there is a uh should the budget be approved this year um that admirals craig flower and Howie uh intersection would be would be looked at.

Ivan Leung5:17:18

Um it would also be looked at in terms of what we could do in the future to address active transportation on this uh uh at that intersection as well.

Ivan Leung5:17:27

Um and then with respect to going down on the island highway as well.

Ivan Leung5:17:31

Uh I don't want to get too much in the details here, but uh you'll notice that in that concept that we did not say we're going to delete the existing sidewalk on the other side or we're going to delete the existing bike lanes on the road.

Ivan Leung5:17:44

And what that means is that we're giving um riders choices.

Ivan Leung5:17:48

And ultimately that's a good way to um obviously there's gonna be people in e-bikes that don't want to use them, also use paths so they have other choices as an example.

Ivan Leung5:17:56

Um people using the going to the amenities at Canadian tire, there's a sidewalk there already.

Ivan Leung5:18:00

But that said, um, these are detailed design items that staff would take to council uh for consideration.

Alison MacKenzie5:18:07

Great, thank you.

John Rogers5:18:09

Councilor Mattson, do you have uh some points?

Ron Mattson5:18:13

Jeez, I feel forgotten out here.

Ron Mattson5:18:14

Yes, no, I do have some points.

Ron Mattson5:18:17

Um, one of the things like V Roll has had a stated policy for decades now that the priority for transportation is pedestrians, cyclists, and public transit, and then the automobile.

Ron Mattson5:18:30

So I I have a little bit of angst when I hear people worrying so much about the automobile when it's sort of at the end of our priority list.

Ron Mattson5:18:38

We already had lots of discussions tonight about how we're going to improve the bus routes, etc.

Ron Mattson5:18:44

And you know, unless we give people in the automobile some uh a disincentive to continue driving, they're they're gonna continue driving.

Ron Mattson5:18:54

So I in in in our future discussions, I just hope you remember that uh we we do have sort of a priority list and and this a lot of the things I heard today, other than as Councillor Brown had mentioned, uh the long needed road on or a sidewalk along Atkins.

Ron Mattson5:19:12

Um their recommendations in terms of this document certainly support Bureau's stated priorities in terms of transportation issues.

John Rogers5:19:25

Okay.

John Rogers5:19:26

Um my thoughts.

John Rogers5:19:28

Um I certainly would uh I'm looking forward to hearing from the public um uh from the open house there that we had on April 3rd.

John Rogers5:19:35

Um I I think one of the concerns uh stayed to me was again, concepts, no pros and cons.

John Rogers5:19:43

So when when the three illustrations of the um Admiral's Island Highway and McKenzie Overpass concept, no pros and cons.

John Rogers5:19:55

So how in the world would somebody reading a survey, looking at this, trying to make sense head or tails, trying to think what might be issues, safety issues and so forth, and saying, oh well, I'll just go with the flow and vote for it.

John Rogers5:20:11

Um so it it that's one of the things that really concerns me is that we uh getting boots on the ground, walking along um, for example, the island highway, uh, where the multi-use path and maybe bi-directional um circumstances, and it's alongside the school, which is next to the bus stop, which is where the overpass is, and the hope that it's going to connect to the island uh E and N is more than $350,000 because we haven't even estimated the remarkable challenges once we get around the corner, having taken out all the trees, widened to six meters, and then you know, we're going to get to Admirals where there's there's no width.

John Rogers5:20:52

So it it is uh concept, and and I understand aspirational concept being the same thing, but it's um uh you know, that really does worry me when we get down to practical things.

John Rogers5:21:04

We got a short list, we got a you know, um Class D estimates, which I gather are plus or minus 50 percent.

John Rogers5:21:11

And um, so there's plus or minus 11 million, plus or minus 50 percent.

John Rogers5:21:14

And we still have to do a detailed design drawing on top of that.

John Rogers5:21:20

I don't know if that's a part of the uh two million.

John Rogers5:21:24

And I guess when we're talking about the highways, Ministry of Highways, Helmick and Overpass, what Santa has said is that they'll work with highways with their propose ideas, and they'll certainly support active transportation and safety and pedestrians and cycling on uh overpasses, underpasses, and so forth, but they're not gonna pay for it.

John Rogers5:21:50

So, you know, this is what concerns me is that we got a two uh we've put this two million dollar price tag suggesting this is something that view our residents will do as an immediate fix over the issues that we've just heard about pedestrian safety, sidewalks, intersections.

John Rogers5:22:08

We haven't even heard in this group here in this presentation, we haven't talked about the five and five major and six minor intersection details.

John Rogers5:22:18

Goodness gracious, what are the costs of that?

John Rogers5:22:21

So, you know, it's these the the price tags and and and all this is is of considerable concern.

John Rogers5:22:27

I'll bet staff's got a comment.

Ivan Leung5:22:30

Thank you, Chair.

Ivan Leung5:22:31

Um with respect to the ministry, uh, you know, we acknowledge that is the ministry's property.

Ivan Leung5:22:40

Um we also acknowledge we've been uh we've been engaging them about this ease infrastructure.

Ivan Leung5:22:46

Um also given that view of royal is bisected by a highway, um, we felt it was important to at least include the conversation in the document.

Ivan Leung5:22:58

Uh, whether we pay for it or whether we wait for grant funding, that's ultimately up to council as part of future budget deliberations.

Ivan Leung5:23:06

Um again, the same thing with respect to multi-use paths, uh uh closing down lanes on Helmkin.

Ivan Leung5:23:13

Um, these were items that we that was assessed as a quick desktop study to determine whether or not it was feasible.

Ivan Leung5:23:20

And if there was a hint of it being feasible, then that would be carried over in the detailed design.

Ivan Leung5:23:25

So these these are just the items that you know we we didn't just put it in there for the sake of putting it in there.

Ivan Leung5:23:29

There is um obviously some technical knowledge and technical analysis put in there before we wanted to recommend that because ultimately, uh, with respect to pros and cons, we are about we are going with the recommendations of the experts in the field.

Ivan Leung5:23:42

Um and that does require that kind of desktop analysis.

John Rogers5:23:46

Yeah.

John Rogers5:23:47

Good to hear.

John Rogers5:23:48

Um, you know, and certainly in and taking the time to spend the six days reviewing this document, I also read all the other transportation plans from Sanitz, Calwood, Esquimol, and um, and it was important to compare that, because you know, their key points were working on sidewalks, bike lanes, on bus routes.

John Rogers5:24:10

And you know, the really unfortunate thing that I didn't see in this report was transit.

John Rogers5:24:16

And you know, we had the presentation tonight, how you know we've got this remarkable um rapid transit link going on, and that'll, you know, and and how we're going to tie into that.

John Rogers5:24:27

And I mean, again, in the conditions report, thank you so much for for referring to the 2021 uh transit uh local plan, but we didn't take the key essence of you know putting bus stops on admirals for the number 40.

John Rogers5:24:44

So, you know, it's it uh the the worry I have is that we didn't, as as Council Mattin said, you know, we didn't take care of the uh the major networks that wanted being you know transit, walking, cycling, transit, on its trails, even we talked about regional trails.

John Rogers5:25:03

There is no discussion about you know the local municipal trails and the trails that we have along the I the TCH that connects McLellan Trail.

John Rogers5:25:13

These are vital municipal connections, even the trails within our municipal parks.

John Rogers5:25:20

How about an assessment of what trails are inferior, that are tripping hazards and so forth, that we should be doing that a kind of assessment, you know, and and looking at that.

John Rogers5:25:30

And I really have a problem that if we've got in the um conditions report, clear information that there's conflict after conflict on our regional trails, the ENN, the Galloping Gadoos, pedestrians are sidelined all the time, speeding.

John Rogers5:25:44

I do bike counts all the time.

John Rogers5:25:48

I see it happening, and I see how cyclists ignore the butt stop signs.

John Rogers5:25:53

So these are all real significant issues that are presenting a safety concern to pedestrians.

John Rogers5:26:01

And if they're not filled, they don't feel they're part of the solution, then they're going to be part of the problem.

John Rogers5:26:12

And I could go on.

John Rogers5:26:14

So, you know, um, no, I do I do have to say one more thing.

John Rogers5:26:18

I have a real concern about the ultimate pedestrian, the ultimate cycling.

John Rogers5:26:25

Again, other municipalities have done their homework and they've done what they've done is they've done short-term, medium-term, long term, and have identified the specific areas through a critical analysis of of which sidewalks and which uh bike lanes should be first priority.

John Rogers5:26:46

We've just got an ultimate.

John Rogers5:26:48

And when I look at it and I see both ends of Atkins Road being on the ultimate, you know, that doesn't make sense.

John Rogers5:26:56

So it's uh um, and I do have a little bit of concern that the only ultimate sidewalk was Jedberg, no mention of Atkins or Watkiss Way or Rudyard, which is also for school kids.

John Rogers5:27:10

So I'm really hoping that um uh we've we can get back and kind of look at more the pedestrian side of things rather than the cycling solutions.

John Rogers5:27:21

And I look forward to seeing a better plan.

Sid Tobias5:27:25

Thank you.

Gery Lemon5:27:28

Any other comments?

Gery Lemon5:27:31

Yeah I I just feel like we came across this bunch of nitpickers and and and um I think there's a lot of good thought and and engagement that went into this so I thank you for that.

Gery Lemon5:27:47

Obviously it's not not not perfect but it probably closely matches the brief you were sent with.

Tim Shaw5:27:54

And I'm prepared to um to move staff's recommendation move move received i just have a quick question um so will there be modifications made to the oh sorry matt um counselor matsen um yeah will there be modifications to the draft plan based on the feedback from the open house through the chair uh thanks counselor for the question um uh the plan is to review the feedback uh with staff look at uh some of the key themes uh from the open house uh and see uh if there's any sort of recurring or substantive concerns uh that we will look at together and then uh uh decide if we're gonna make changes, actual amendments to some of the recommendations.

Tim Shaw5:28:45

But at a high level, at this point, we're not intending to make large changes to the plan because we've uh engaged the community throughout the process.

Tim Shaw5:28:53

And the whole point of the second online survey that we did in the fall was to present those preliminary recommendations to the community.

Tim Shaw5:28:59

Uh so uh there might be some minor tweaks, uh, but that's gonna be a conversation that we have with staff to figure out how we proceed with that.

Alison MacKenzie5:29:06

Right.

Alison MacKenzie5:29:06

And and so for some reason I had it in my head that this was coming back next at for council, but that can't be the timing.

Ivan Leung5:29:14

So we'll take a look again, but at the end of the day, that the goal was to bring it to council next week with a preface document put uh on the front side.

Ivan Leung5:29:23

And the idea is because a lot of the comments that I've heard today and in the comments we received in the last week are very, very much detailed design based.

Ivan Leung5:29:31

So the point of the exercise is to put a document in front of the active transportation network plan that says these are the things that um that council has mentioned that we should look at at the detail design.

Ivan Leung5:29:43

Um in that way the comments that we receive from yourselves today as well as through the last week through the exercise, um, they're considered for future projects.

John Rogers5:29:52

Okay, thank you.

John Rogers5:29:53

Okay, my turn.

John Rogers5:29:55

So um I hear at the end of reading the staff's report, we've got an extension to May 31st.

John Rogers5:30:03

And if I understand things correctly from staff, in order to get our money from the province, we have to adopt a plan.

John Rogers5:30:14

Is that correct?

Ivan Leung5:30:16

Uh looking at the doc at the actual agreement is to have a final active transportation network plan.

Ivan Leung5:30:22

So that would typically mean that there's an agreement in principle from council.

Ivan Leung5:30:26

And that can be achieved by the idea of having a document in front of the active transportation network plan that would inform us on how to move forward when we go into the detailed design.

John Rogers5:30:38

So I'm I'm worried about um I'm still not clear about the the deadline.

John Rogers5:30:41

You know, the May 31st deadline, is that is that it we've got to adopt a plan that we don't like?

Ivan Leung5:30:47

Uh like.

Ivan Leung5:30:48

Like I said before, a final active transportation network plan needs to be submitted to them to get the grant.

Ivan Leung5:30:54

Boy, we got a problem.

John Rogers5:30:55

Okay.

John Rogers5:30:56

That's that's gonna take some discussion.

John Rogers5:30:58

You know, uh can staff give us information about uh okay yeah just second Ron.

John Rogers5:31:04

How much of this um uh are we getting uh what what's the grant value?

Ivan Leung5:31:11

I don't know as a fact then do you know it's 50% over yeah it was 50% of the total cost of the consultant which was is between 50 to 70 thousand dollars around there.

Ivan Leung5:31:24

I think it's max 50,000.

John Rogers5:31:26

Okay.

John Rogers5:31:27

Anyway I've if I hear that we're just going to get minor tweaks and and well yeah we'll have to see.

Ron Mattson5:31:34

Okay Ron, what would you like?

Ron Mattson5:31:36

Well I just wanted to point out to express my appreciation to those who uh did the report and to acknowledge that uh not all of counsel is negative on this report and uh i think it has a lot of good things there's certainly things we can tweak and as staff pointed out it's a a living document that can be modified and I just think some of the negative comments I heard this evening were uh totally unwarranted great Ron we'll have a talk you haven't read it okay we have a motion to receive that's not worth a comment John so motion to receive all those in favor now who's the seconder you second okay great all the we've got a mover and a seconder all those in favor against carried yes we also have correspondence um uh from the view well climate coalition they've given some feedback on the octave transportation plan i hope you've read it and um can we get a motion to receive that i'll i'll move that seconder we've already moved receipt for that so we can do it again.

John Rogers5:33:00

That was another one.

John Rogers5:33:01

I thought it was another one.

John Rogers5:33:02

No, it was the same one.

John Rogers5:33:04

We can move move.

John Rogers5:33:05

I'd like to do it twice.

John Rogers5:33:06

Okay.

John Rogers5:33:06

All in his favorite against carried and now i'll hand it back to the chair.

John Rogers5:33:11

Mayor twice thank you, Council.

Sid Tobias5:33:15

Uh so I think we've we could do it three times to uh move receipt to correspondence on the blue sheet, but I think twice as sufficient.

Sid Tobias5:33:25

Um question period.

Sid Tobias5:33:27

Is there anybody here that would like to ask a question of counsel?

Sid Tobias5:33:33

Nobody here, Carl?

Sid Tobias5:33:35

Anyone on the phone that would like to ask a question of counsel?

Don Brown5:33:38

Mayor Tobias, we've had no calls or callers this evening.

Sid Tobias5:33:42

Slow night.

Sid Tobias5:33:42

What do you attribute it to, Carl?

Sterling Scory5:33:47

You may be right about the hockey game.

Sterling Scory5:33:49

Uh it might be uh people were gardening all day and are tired.

Sid Tobias5:33:53

Okay.

Ron Mattson5:33:53

Well, I thought it was because it's 1:30.

Sid Tobias5:33:58

Travel safely, Counselor Matson.

Sid Tobias5:33:59

All in favor.

Sid Tobias5:34:01

Can I get a motion to terminate, please?

T. Preston5:34:07

Thank you very much.