Appendix
APPENDIX C: TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT RESULTS
September 12, 2023Pages 219–2202 sections
Detailed table comparing traffic volumes against BC MoTI warrant requirements for the installation of a traffic signal.
Identifies 9 specific warrants assessedWarrant 2 (Interruption of Continuous Traffic) and Warrant 5 (System Warrant) were met for AM peak conditions
Page 219–220
APPENDIX C: TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT RESULTS
Traffic Signal Warrant Results
| Development Scenario | Opening Day Pre-Development AM | Opening Day Pre-Development PM | Opening Day Post-Development AM | Opening Day Post-Development PM | 2035 10-year Horizon Pre-Development AM | 2035 10-year Horizon Pre-Development PM | 2035 10-year Horizon Post-Development AM | 2035 10-year Horizon Post-Development PM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traffic Volumes | ||||||||
| Major Leg (EB + WB) | 1427 | 1667 | 1449 | 1727 | 1607 | 1876 | 1631 | 1938 |
| Minor Leg (NB, peak direction only) | 17 | 13 | 91 | 51 | 19 | 14 | 93 | 53 |
| Warrant | Warrant Met? | |||||||
| Warrant 1: Minimum Vehicular Volume | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| - Major Street combined Vol (vph) > 500? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| - Minor Street combined Vol (vph) > 150? | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| Warrant 2: Interruption of Continuous Traffic | N | N | Y | N | N | N | Y | N |
| - Major Street combined Vol (vph) > 750vph? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| - Minor Street combined Vol (vph) > 75vph? | N | N | Y | N | N | N | Y | N |
| - Will signal seriously interrupt traffic flow? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Warrant 3: Progressive Movement | NA | |||||||
| Warrant 4: Collision Experience | 6 COLLISIONS IN LAST 5 YEARS (4 PDO + 2 CASUALTY) | |||||||
| Warrant 5: System Warrant | N | N | Y | N | N | N | Y | N |
| - Total entering volumes > 1000vph? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| - Meets Warrant 1 | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| - Meets Warrant 2 | N | N | Y | N | N | N | Y | N |
| - Meets Warrant 6 | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| - Meets Warrant 7 | N | N | Y | N | N | N | Y | N |
| - Meets Warrant 9 | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| Warrant 6: Combination Warrant | NA | |||||||
| Warrant 7: Four Hour Volume Warrant | LACK DATA TO RUN WARRANT BUT LIKELY MET FOR POST DEVELOPMENT AM PEAK | |||||||
| - Minor Street combined Vol (vph) > 80vph? | N | N | Y | N | N | N | Y | N |
| Warrant 8: Peak Hour Delay (All 3 Conditions must be met) | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| - One leg of minor >= four vehicle-hours delay (vhd) | N | N | Y (4.02) | N (2.95) | N | N | Y (7.21) | Y (6.51) |
| - One leg of minor >= 100 vph | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| - Total intersection volumes >= 800 vph | N | N | Y | N | N | N | Y | Y |
| Warrant 9: Peak Hour Volume | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| - One leg of minor >= 100 vph | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| Total Number of Warrants Met? | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Page 219–220
Extracted from: 2023 09 12 Committee of the Whole Agenda - Agenda - Pdf