This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Committee of the Whole/Documents/Rezoning Application for 339, 341, & 345 Island Highway (Presentation)
Presentation

Rezoning Application for 339, 341, & 345 Island Highway (Presentation)

September 12, 2023Pages 259–28011 sections

A comprehensive staff presentation outlining the rezoning application details, project statistics, and staff recommendations.

Total site area: 12,219 m2Proposed Floor Space Ratio (FSR): 1.6:1Proposed building height: 19.2 mTotal on-site trees: 125Trees to be removed: 43

Rezoning Application for 339, 341, & 345 Island Highway

Committee of the Whole – September 12, 2023 REZONING 2023-01 331, 341, & 345 Island Highway

Page 259–280

BACKGROUND

  • Former site of Cambridge Motel
  • Functions as below market rental housing in the community
  • Located in the Harbour Neighbourhood
  • Designated: Mixed Residential
  • Zoned: C-5 Tourist Commercial
Aerial map of the project site and surrounding area with the property boundary outlined in red
Aerial map of the project site and surrounding area with the property boundary outlined in red
  • 12,219 m²
  • Rezoning requires a new Comprehensive Development (CD) Zone
  • Does not require a OCP Amendment
Detailed aerial parcel map showing lot numbers and property addresses including 339, 341, and 345 Island Highway
Detailed aerial parcel map showing lot numbers and property addresses including 339, 341, and 345 Island Highway
Page 259–280

PROJECT INFORMATION: Zoning Review

Regulation Permitted C-5: Tourist Commercial Zone Proposed Comprehensive Development Zone
Floor Space Ratio 0.4:1 1.6:1
Lot Coverage 50% 29%
Impermeable Coverage 80% TBD
Building Height (m) 9 19.2 m
Front Yard Setback (m) – Prince Robert Drive 7.5 m 8.0 m
Side Yard Setback (m) – Heddle Park 6.0 m 8.5 m
Rear Yard Setback (m) – Fire Hall 7.5 m 6.0 m
Flanking Yard Setback (m) – Island Highway 3.0 m 8.0 m
Page 259–280

PROJECT INFORMATION: Parking Review

Parking by Type Units Parking Requirement Parking Proposed
Studio 5 1 per dwelling unit 5
1 Bedroom 120 1 per dwelling unit 120
2 Bedroom 108 1.5 per dwelling unit 162
3 Bedroom 5 2 per dwelling unit 10
Total Small Car Parking (max 30%) n/a 90 (maximum) None – TBD.
Electric Vehicle Parking Spaces (Level 3 – 240 V.) Every required parking space to have electric charging capability. 1 designated EV parking space on-site. None – TBD.
Accessible Parking 1 per every 100 3 None
Bicycle Parking 238 dwellings 1 per dwelling unit + a rack at each building entrance 238

NOTE: All required residential and bicycle parking (Class 1) must be electrified.

Page 259–280

PROJECT INFORMATION: Unit Mix Overview

Type Number of Units % Total Size (sq. ft.)
Studio 5 2% 450 – 575 ft2
1 Bedroom 120 50% 600 – 710 ft2
2 Bedroom 108 45% 845 – 905 ft2
3 Bedroom 5 2% 1,105 ft2
Amenity Space (Indoor) 1 N/A 1,450 ft2

NOTE: The number of units provided and the size of the units are conceptual and are subject to change prior to building permit issuance.

Page 259–280

PROJECT INFORMATION: Conceptual Design

Conceptual Rendering Perspective at Island Highway

Architectural rendering perspective showing the proposed development from the Island Highway side
Architectural rendering perspective showing the proposed development from the Island Highway side
Close-up architectural rendering perspective of the building's street-level interface with Island Highway
Close-up architectural rendering perspective of the building's street-level interface with Island Highway

Conceptual Rendering of Site Plan

Conceptual site plan rendering showing building footprints, central green, outdoor amenity spaces, and landscaping
Conceptual site plan rendering showing building footprints, central green, outdoor amenity spaces, and landscaping

Conceptual Rendering of Underground Parking

Conceptual rendering of the underground parking level layout
Conceptual rendering of the underground parking level layout

Conceptual Rendering of Building Cross Sections

Conceptual building cross-section diagrams showing building height and massing relative to site topography
Conceptual building cross-section diagrams showing building height and massing relative to site topography

Conceptual Digital Elevation Models

  • Flanking Yard (Island Highway)
    Digital elevation model rendering of the Island Highway elevation
    Digital elevation model rendering of the Island Highway elevation
  • Side Yard (Heddle Park)
    Digital elevation model rendering of the side elevation facing Heddle Park
    Digital elevation model rendering of the side elevation facing Heddle Park
  • Front Yard (Prince Robert Drive)
    Digital elevation model rendering of the front elevation along Prince Robert Drive
    Digital elevation model rendering of the front elevation along Prince Robert Drive
  • Rear Yard (Fire Hall)
    Digital elevation model rendering of the rear elevation facing the Fire Hall
    Digital elevation model rendering of the rear elevation facing the Fire Hall
Page 259–280

DISCUSSION: Part 1 Official Community Plan Review

The development site is not located within an identified Neighbourhood Centre or Community Centre in the OCP Community Development Framework.

Land Use Designation (LUD): Mixed Residential

  1. Small lot detached houses, townhouses, and low-rise apartments up to 3 storeys and a maximum 1.25:1 floor space ratio (FSR); or
  2. Four storeys for apartment and a maximum FSR of 1.6:1

The proposal meets the intended density and land use.

  • Policy LU1.4 Diversity of Forms and Uses
  • Policy LU4.2 Support Walking, Cycling and Transit
  • Policy LU4.5 Street-oriented buildings
  • Policy HS1.1 Range of Housing Types
  • Policy HS1.6 Loss of Rental Housing
  • Policy NE1.6 Native Trees and Vegetation
  • Policy NE1.7 Urban Forest
Page 259–280

DISCUSSION: Part 2 Zoning Bylaw Review

  • The proposed development requires a new Comprehensive Development Zone to regulate height, setbacks, and density.
  • A variance to the height is required, the proposed height is greater than the OCP LUD permits.
  • All future variances will be considered at the time of a future Development Permit.
Page 259–280

DISCUSSION: Part 3 Potential Land Use Impacts

Transportation and Parking

Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) recommendations:

  1. Island Highway and Prince Robert Drive intersection upgrade to signalized intersection
  2. Install a westbound turn land on Island Highway at Prince Robert Drive
  3. Install a sidewalk with landscape boulevards along Island Highway frontage
  4. Upgrade existing bus stops
  5. A two-way left turn lane between Prince Robert Drive and Burnett Road is also recommended; and is supported by Town’s documents, but would require road widening thus would be considered capital works.

On-site Parking

  1. On-site parking requirements will be confirmed in greater detail at the Development Permit stage.

Site and Fire Access

  • Engineering and Planning are supportive of a singular vehicle access off Prince Robert Drive.
  • The proposed plans do not meet fire truck access requirements; Fire Department must be able to access the buildings on-site via aerial ladder truck.

Environmental Impacts

  • The site is not within a Environmental Development Permit Area: Sensitive Terrestrial Ecosystem.
  • There is a large stand of trees that the applicant proposes to preserve via a green space & trails.
  • Staff recommendation: Invasive species are present on-site and staff recommend that as a condition of rezoning, the species be removed.

Tree Impacts

  • 125 on-site trees total
  • 43 on-site trees to be removed
  • Tree replacement ratio 2:1 is required, to be determined at Development Permit Stage with detailed landscape plan.
  • Tree permit required prior to issuance of a BP.
  • Arborist to remain on-site during construction.
Tree impact map showing existing trees and those proposed for removal relative to the proposed building footprint
Tree impact map showing existing trees and those proposed for removal relative to the proposed building footprint

Servicing Requirements

  • Stormwater and Sewer details to be determined via Servicing Agreement at time of Building Permit Review (prior to issuance); conceptual sewer plans indicate that the sewer main may need to be upgraded
  • Road widening of Prince Robert Drive will be done via a cost share to ensure the road remains in Town right-of-way

On-site Outdoor Amenities

  • On-site trail and greenspace area, children’s play area, and a barbeque area
  • Staff recommendation: Staff do not support the proposed public dog park or possible trail connection to Heddle Park

Green Space and Natural Buffer

  • Staff recommendation: Staff recommend that a covenant be registered on title to protect and establish a buffer adjacent to Heddle Park
  • Staff recommendation: Staff also recommend that a covenant be registered to preserve the proposed green space on-site for trail use
  • Further conversations will be required prior to consideration of First Reading

Foundation and Underpinning

  • Where underpinning is proposed, the applicant must obtain permissions from the affected property owner and necessary agencies (e.g. CRD).
  • Where underpinning is proposed in municipal lands the applicant must apply for a license to occupy in addition to approval
Page 259–280

DISCUSSION: Part 4 Amenity Contributions

  • A prior Landlift Analysis found there was no lift in land value
  • Staff have requested that the applicant consider providing below-market and accessible housing units, but affordability remains a challenge
  • Providing affordable rental dwellings and a mix of dwellings is consistent with the OCP
  • The development site is in the proximity of community amenities, transportation infrastructure, and an identified growth area to support tenants
  • An alternative is that the applicant pay cash with guidance from the Policy

Staff will continue to work with the applicant prior to consideration of First Reading should the application advance to Public Hearing.

Page 259–280

DISCUSSION: Part 5 Tenant Assistance Plan

  • The proposal is grandfathered and is not affected by the Tenant Assistance Policy
  • Tenants will be assisted via monetary payment for relocation and moving based on tenure (years)
  • The value provided is above the required compensation in the Town’s Tenant Assistance Policy
Page 259–280

Document Images

(1)
Document image
Extracted from: 2023 09 12 Committee of the Whole Agenda - Agenda - Pdf