This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Committee of the Whole/Documents/DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE PERMIT 2023-07 – 25 CHANCELLOR AVENUE
Staff Report

DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE PERMIT 2023-07 – 25 CHANCELLOR AVENUE

September 12, 2023Pages 285–2886 sections

Staff report introducing a development variance permit application for the length and separation of an accessory building from a principal building.

25 Chancellor Avenue835m2 parcel9.15m proposed accessory building length (7.5m max required)2.8m proposed separation (3.0m min required)

TOWN OF VIEW ROYAL PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGAGEMENT REPORT

TO: Committee of the Whole DATE: Sept. 7, 2023 FROM: J.Chow, RPP, MCIP Senior Planner MEETING DATE: Sept. 12, 2023

DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE PERMIT 2023-07 – 25 CHANCELLOR AVENUE

RECOMMENDATION:

THAT the report titled “Development Variance Permit 2023-07 – 25 Chancellor Avenue” from the Senior Planner dated September 7, 2023 be received for information.

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to introduce a development variance permit application for the length of an accessory building and for the separation of an accessory building from a principal building.

TIME CRITICAL:

This project does not have critical time elements for the Town.

BACKGROUND:

The 835m² parcel is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Chancellor Avenue and Conard Street as shown in Figure 1 below. The R-1B zoned parcel contains a detached dwelling and an accessory building was removed recently.

2021 Air photo of the subject property showing the lot lines and "Subject Property" label
2021 Air photo of the subject property showing the lot lines and "Subject Property" label
Figure 1. 2021 Air photo of the subject property
Page 285–288

DISCUSSION:

The proposal is to replace an existing old accessory building with a new 39m² accessory building as shown in Figure 2 below (see Attachments 2 and 3).

Hand-drawn conceptual sketches of the proposed accessory building including a perspective view, a detailed elevation, and a basic site plan layout
Hand-drawn conceptual sketches of the proposed accessory building including a perspective view, a detailed elevation, and a basic site plan layout
Figure 2. Building concept

The subject property is currently zoned R-1B Detached Residential (Medium Lot), and the concept complies with the following zoning requirements for accessory buildings:

Zoning Bylaw requirement for accessory buildings (Section 4.6 of the R1-B Zone) Required Proposed
Maximum width 7.5m 4.26m
Minimum setback from all lot lines 1.2m 1.45m
Maximum lot coverage (floor area cap) 60m² 39m²
Maximum lot coverage (ratio) 10% 5%
Maximum building height 4.5m 3.7m

The applicant requests the following variances:

Zoning Bylaw requirement for accessory buildings (R1-B Zone) Required Proposed Difference
s.4.6.2 Maximum length of an accessory building 7.5m 9.15m 1.65m
s.4.6.3 Minimum separation of an accessory building from the principal building 3.0m 2.8m 0.2m

The applicant’s rationale for the requests is as follows:

  1. They would like to site the new building in the same location as the old accessory building.
  2. They would like to reuse and add on to the partial foundation of the old accessory building.
  3. The building length would keep the building narrow and situated on existing hard surface. This would also minimize intrusion into the rear yard, which features a large willow tree.

Staff have no objection to the proposal. Building staff viewed the property and from visual inspection, the partial foundation appears to have potential for reuse, subject to certification by a structural engineer. The variance for building separation is minor and has no impacts on neighbouring properties.

Page 285–288

SUSTAINABILITY/CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS:

There are no significant sustainability or climate change impacts associated with this proposal.

Page 285–288

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no financial implications for the Town.

Page 285–288

ALTERNATIVES:

The Committee may:

  1. Recommend that Council decline the application; or
  2. Refer the application back to staff for further refinements to the requested variances.
Page 285–288

CONCLUSION:

Staff have no objection to the proposal. Pending comments from the Committee of the Whole, notification can be conducted for a Council meeting to consider the development variance permit.

CONCURRENCE: Initials Comments
Chief Administrative Officer KA Recommend Approval
REVIEWED BY: Initials
Director of Corporate Administration n/a
Director of Finance n/a
Director of Development Services LT
Director of Engineering and Parks n/a
Director of Protective Services n/a

Attachments:

  1. Attachment 1: Applicant Letter, May 24, 2023
  2. Attachment 2: Site Plan
  3. Attachment 3: Building Concept
Page 285–288

Document Images

(1)
Document image
Extracted from: 2023 09 12 Committee of the Whole Agenda - Agenda - Pdf