REZONING – 1449 Burnside Rd W (Eagle Nest)

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT

TO: Committee of the Whole DATE: February 26, 2020 FROM: J. Davison, MCIP, Planner MEETING DATE: March 10, 2020 FILE NO.: 3360-20-2020-01

REZONING – 1449 Burnside Rd W (Eagle Nest)

RECOMMENDATION

THAT Committee receive the report from the Planner entitled “REZONING – 1449 Burnside Rd (Eagle’s Nest)” dated February 26th, 2020 for information.

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER’S COMMENTS

I concur with the recommendation.

DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES’ COMMENTS

I concur with the recommendation.

DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING’S COMMENTS

I concur with the recommendation.

PURPOSE OF REPORT

The purpose of this report is to introduce a new application to rezone the Burnside Helmcken properties at 3, 5 and 9 Helmcken and 1449 Burnside Rd (henceforward known as the ‘Eagles Nest’ property) to an attached 3-building apartment configuration with a proposed 247 units.

BACKGROUND

This application follows an earlier application made in 2018. Committee of the Whole recommended against moving that application to bylaw readings despite several iterations of the design during 2018-2019.

PROJECT INFORMATION

The application re-configures the site in response to Council’s concerns regarding the previous design’s density, height, siting and site circulation. In general terms the revised proposal is supportable by staff. The determining factor for this project will be Council’s appetite for the revised design and slightly reduced FSR in the context of this property within the Town’s Official Community Plan’s Northern Gateway Community Corridor that is also identified as one of the Change Areas within the bylaw.

The previous four-building proposal has been re-configured into three separate structures in a more contextually appropriate design.

Site Data Summary

The parking as proposed meets the bylaw requirements; no variances are required.

Unit Mix

The proposal is currently for strata condos in the following configuration:

• 85 one-bedroom units
• 140 two-bedroom units
• 22 three-bedroom units

The unit mix can change as the project moves through the Development Permit process if parking requirements are met and FSR is not exceeded.

Building Height

The proposal ranges from three storeys at the lowest points of the buildings, stepping up to a portion of Building 1 at six storeys on the north side adjacent to the ALR land. The buildings have been stepped and pulled back from strategic points to minimize neighbouring visual impact.

Building 1 is 19.2m high and ranging from 4 to 6 storeys, strategically stepped to address the Hidden Oaks views.

Building 2 is 14.8m high and ranging from 3 to 4 storeys (plus ½ storey at P1), again stepped from 3 to 4 storeys to address the Hidden Oaks interface.

Building 3 is 16.9m high and ranging from 4 to 5 storeys.

In support of the application the following has been submitted:

• Rezoning Application Submission Summary Document – Applicant – January 17, 2020
• Architectural Drawings – de Hoog & Kierulf architects – January 22, 2020
• Civil Engineering Drawings – McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd. – January 23, 2020
• Landscape Drawings – Murdoch DeGreeff – January 22, 2020
• Survey Plan – McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd. – February 23, 2018
• Letter to Mayor and Council – January 19, 2020
• Community Engagement Summary – March 4, 2020
• Stormwater Management Plan – September 13, 2018
• Traffic Impact Assessment – WATT Consulting Group – January 10, 2019
• Tree Preservation Plan – September 14, 2018
• Phase 1 ESA Report - McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd. – March 8, 2018
• Parking Study - Watt Consulting Group – September 14, 2018
• Helmcken Road Report – Watt Consulting Group - March 27, 2019
• Geotechnical Memo – Ryzuk Geotechnical – March 9, 2018
• Limited Hazardous Materials Investigation – Island Environmental Health & Safety Ltd. - March 20, 2018
• Helmcken & Burnside Tenant Relocation Matrix – Applicant - January 22, 2020
• Eagle’s Nest Development Data – Applicant - February 4, 2020

Official Community Plan Context

The subject property (on the map below in blue) is an important gateway site for the Town of View Royal. The design of the Northern Gateway Community Corridor requires the creation of “…a strong sense of place in the area surrounding the hospital and leading into the southern areas of the Town”.

The Northern Gateway Community Corridor includes the lots fronting Helmcken Road between Burnside Road and the Trans-Canada Highway, and a few lots on Watkiss Way on the east side of the Helmcken intersection. The corridor has experienced incremental infill development in the form of higher density housing. A continuation of residential infill that will bring more housing closer to the hospital and revitalize underutilized land is envisioned for the Northern Gateway Community Corridor. Ancillary commercial and hospital-related uses will also be encouraged as part of mixed-use projects closer to the Trans-Canada Highway and the larger parcels near Watkiss Way.

Development in the Northern Gateway Community Corridor should be carefully reviewed to consider the following:

• Uses and densities that benefit from the Corridor’s proximity to the Victoria General Hospital and the planned regional rapid transit stop. Attached housing, including townhomes and apartments, should be encouraged throughout the Corridor.
• Access and circulation.
• Quality of the built environment.
• Wayfinding and placemaking elements that reinforce the Hospital Neighbourhood as the northern gateway to View Royal and create a strong sense of place in the area surrounding the hospital and leading into the southern areas of the Town.
• Connections to the planned hospital rapid transit stop, Galloping Goose Regional Trail, Trans-Canada Highway and established residential area east of Helmcken Road.

This is the current proposal for the Burnside/Helmcken intersection interface. It provides an attractive entry feature that is much improved over the existing condition with fully realized building facades that address the street corner in an attractive fashion.

While detailed design is addressed at the Form and Character Development Permit stage, the application provides a level of detail that establishes those expectations along with the rezoning. Council will have full control over the form and character of the project when considering the Development Permit.

Design

With the new proposal the applicant has reduced the number of buildings from four to three, stepped the top floors back from the building facades, and pulled the buildings back from the Hidden Oaks boundary. There is much more visual interest in the building articulations from all external angles. The western interface between the Hidden Oaks development, especially, has been reconfigured in a positive manner.

1. There is a focus on reducing visual and physical impact on the Hidden Oaks townhouses to the west. The terracing of the building, partial storeys and the open space between the two buildings provides more relief than the previous uniform building wall. The buildings are also pulled back from the property line, providing varied, treed open space for screening the two developments.

2. The new proposal provides a more multi-use feel in the courtyard with a proposed ‘woonerf’ (literally: ‘living street’ in Dutch) which emphasizes shared space and traffic calming while still permitting traffic flow. Protective Services requires that the woonerf meet BC Building Code (BCBC) for Fire Truck Access. While the applicant has assured staff that it meets minimum BCBC requirements, additional consideration will need to be made regarding design details to accommodate the Town’s ladder truck and an acceptable turnaround or loop design.

A large element of the concept is to design a functional roadway with non-traditional road surfaces that resemble pedestrian-friendly squares and plazas. This invites pedestrian and bicycle traffic and indicates to drivers that it is a shared space and not a dedicated roadway. This project’s space is in a conceptual stage which may be refined at the Form and Character Development Permit stage.

Woonerf examples are below:

Community Amenity Contribution

The Community Amenity Contributions Policy calls for a land lift analysis to be conducted for residential developments where more than 100 residential units are proposed or possible. A land lift analysis determines the ‘lift’ in land value as a result of rezoning. The community amenity contribution target is 50% of the land lift.

As an alternative, staff proposes that the community amenity contribution target be the policy’s standard rate of $3,500 per additional multifamily residential unit to be provided prior to building permit issuance. For this proposal, the contribution would be $864,500 based on the per-unit rate. It is recommended that the community amenity contribution rate and provision be secured in a covenant as a condition of the rezoning.

OCP Policy HS1.4 Housing Amenity Contributions also supports a housing amenity contribution to the Town, which could be directed to the CRD Regional Housing Trust Fund. A portion of the cash community amenity contributions could be used for this purpose.

Transportation Impact

The Town’s Engineering Department (with assistance from Bunt & Associates Transportation Planning & Engineering’s peer review) has completed the following initial review of the provided TIA:

• It appears that waiting to see how Mackenzie interchange impacts traffic flow would be prudent. We note the Town is doing the same for several other traffic issues.
• Both the southbound traffic on Helmcken and the westbound & perhaps eastbound traffic on Burnside may require alteration of the intersection. (the developer had suggested originally that they would vastly improve traffic flow with their suggested improvements)
• The TIA suggests that they don’t have an impact on traffic volumes (section 4.8) and all issues are a result of the background (existing) traffic:
  • “It is important to highlight that future failing conditions are due to background traffic, not site generated traffic. When site traffic is added to the study area intersections at buildout and 10 years beyond buildout, site traffic has minimal impact on level of service, delay and queuing at both intersections.”
• Alternatively, they speak to the impacts of even small amounts of traffic (section 4.7):
  • “As noted, small volume increases to an already failing movement can exponentially increase delay and/or queuing”.
• Bunt points out that additional R.O.W. may be required on the Burnside frontage which suggests alteration of the eastbound leg of Burnside and a sidewalk on the frontage.
• Once Mackenzie interchange is complete an agreed upon assessment should be completed to determine mitigation expectations of the Town of View Royal.

Site Servicing

The applicant is working on a detailed conceptual site servicing plan which would indicate water and wastewater capacities, as well as shallow servicing plans. Staff does not anticipate issues in this regard.

Tenant Compensation

The applicant has provided a Tenant Relocation Plan:

Public Engagement

The applicant has provided a Public Engagement Summary Report showing the engagement with affected neighbours, including the Hidden Oaks residents. The applicant has shown that they are listening to the residents, and the emergent design is more sensitive to those concerns regarding screening, height and density. The supplied interface cross-sections show the treatment of the interface at Hidden Oaks includes an increased setback and open space between the buildings, and the addition of a stepped building from 4 to 5 storeys minimizes the visual impact of the partial fifth storey.

For the residents across Helmcken Rd, the change in height is modest.

ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION

The 2018 proposal for the site was rejected by Committee of the Whole largely due to the expression of the density (1.57 FSR) on the site. Committee felt the visual impact was not satisfactory at either the Burnside/Helmcken intersection, nor the interface between the site and the Hidden Oaks townhouse complex to the southwest.

The applicant has responded with a proposal for 1.5 FSR in a three-building configuration which is the product of staff and Council’s input, and the applicant’s public engagement process.

Design Critique

The design is much improved over the previous four-building design. The stepped, terraced and articulated massing addresses the interfaces in a much more appealing and sensitive way, and in staff’s opinion is as reasonable as can be expected while maintaining a density (1.5 FSR) close to the maximum indicated in the Official Community Plan’s Mixed Residential Land Use Designation (1.6 FSR).

The proposal of 22 three-bedroom condominiums is particularly attractive in that there is a significant need for more affordable family-friendly attached units.

The proposed interior concept is also much improved, with a sense of shared space and a pedestrian-prioritized environment which will also accommodate surface traffic and, with some tweaking, the requirements of the Town’s Protective Services Department.

Further design consideration will be available to Council at the Mixed Residential Form and Character Development Permit stage.

Information Still Required

Staff will continue to work with the applicant to refine preliminary servicing requirements and analysis of the continuing and evolving Mackenzie interchange project and its impact on regional traffic.

Staff’s opinion regarding traffic is unchanged; the Town should not expect that one project will either significantly impact, or solve, what is a regional traffic issue. The Town must not let the perception of the current conditions fetter their decision making and prevent the Town from realizing its Official Community Plan goals.

Conclusion

This application is much improved over the previous and is supported by staff. The proposal addresses the Northern Gateway condition within the OCP by providing an attractive entry feature to View Royal, it addresses the need for housing close to the hospital, to the regional pathway system, and to amenities at Eagle Creek Village. It is sensitive to the residential and agricultural interfaces, it provides a range of housing suitable for individuals and families alike, and generally represents a balance between realizing the densities described within the Mixed Residential OCP Land Use Designation while being sensitive to the existing surrounding uses.

RECOMMENDATION

THAT Committee receive the report from the Planner entitled “REZONING – 1449 Burnside Rd (Eagle’s Nest)” dated February 26th, 2020 for information.

SUBMITTED BY: J. Davison MCIP RPP, Community Planner

REVIEWED BY: L. Chase MCIP RPP, Director of Development Services

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Subject Property Map
2. Subject Property Orthophoto
3. Rezoning Application Submission Summary Document – Applicant – January 17, 2020
4. Architectural Drawings – de Hoog & Kierulf architects – January 22, 2020
5. Civil Engineering Drawings – McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd. – January 23, 2020
6. Landscape Drawings – Murdoch DeGreeff – January 22, 2020
7. Survey Plan – McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd. – February 23, 2018
8. Letter to Mayor and Council – January 19, 2020
9. Community Engagement Summary – March 4, 2020
10. Stormwater Management Plan – September 13, 2018
11. Traffic Impact Assessment – WATT Consulting Group – January 10, 2019
12. Tree Preservation Plan – September 14, 2018
13. Phase 1 ESA Report - McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd. – March 8, 2018
14. Parking Study - Watt Consulting Group – September 14, 2018
15. Helmcken Road Report – Watt Consulting Group - March 27, 2019
16. Geotechnical Memo – Ryzuk Geotechnical – March 9, 2018
17. Limited Hazardous Materials Investigation – Island Environmental Health & Safety Ltd. - March 20, 2018
18. Helmcken & Burnside Tenant Relocation Matrix – Applicant - January 22, 2020
19. Eagle’s Nest Development Data – Applicant - February 4, 2020