This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Committee of the Whole/Documents/Riparian Areas Regulation Assessment Report 2670 Herbate Road, View Royal, BC
Staff Report

Riparian Areas Regulation Assessment Report 2670 Herbate Road, View Royal, BC

September 13, 2016Pages 160–18312 sections

A professional environmental assessment regarding the impact of the proposed dock on the riparian area of McKenzie Lake.

2 APPROVAL OF AGENDA
July 6, 2016Prepared by Lehna Malmkvist, RPBioIdentifies a SPEA (Streamside Protection and Enhancement Area) of 15m

Riparian Areas Regulation Assessment Report

Page 160–183

2670 Herbate Road, View Royal, BC

Prepared for: Damon Langlois 3910 Ansell Road Victoria, BC V8P 3WC

By: Lehna Malmkvist, RPBio #1613 Swell Environmental Consulting Ltd. 516-21 Dallas Road Victoria, BC V8V 4Z9

July 6, 2016

Photo of property leading down to McKenzie Lake
Photo of property leading down to McKenzie Lake
Page 160–183

Riparian Areas Regulation: Assessment Report

Date: July 6, 2016

I. Primary QEP Information

Field Information
First Name Lehna
Middle Name Kathleen
Last Name Malmkvist
Designation RPBio
Company Swell Environmental Consulting Ltd.
Registration # 1613
Address 516-21 Dallas Road
City Victoria
Postal/Zip V8V 4Z9
Prov/state BC
Country Canada

II. Secondary QEP Information

(No information provided)

III. Developer Information

Field Information
First Name Damon
Last Name Langlois
Address 3910 Ansell Road
City Victoria
Postal/Zip V8P3WC
Prov/state BC
Country Canada

IV. Development Information

Field Information
Development Type Recreational
Area of Development (ha) 0.008
Riparian Length (m) 43
Lot Area (ha) 0.435
Nature of Development New
Proposed Start Date Aug 15, 2016
Proposed End Date Sept 15, 2016

V. Location of Proposed Development

Field Information
Street Address 2670 Herbate Road
Local Government Town of View Royal
City View Royal
Stream Name McKenzie Lake
Legal Description (PID) 025-069-039
Region Vancouver Island
Stream/River Type Lake
DFO Area South Coast
Watershed Code 920-077200-43300-37800
Latitude 48° 28' 58.42"
Longitude 123° 28' 50.11"
Page 160–183

Table of Contents

  • Section 1. Description of Fisheries Resources Values and a Description of the Development proposal: 4
  • Section 2. Results of Riparian Assessment (SPEA width): 5
  • Section 3. Site Plan: 7
  • Section 4. Measures to Protect and Maintain the SPEA: 10
    • 4.1 Danger Trees: 10
    • 4.2 Windthrow: 10
    • 4.3 Slope Stability: 10
    • 4.4 Protection of Trees: 10
    • 4.5 Encroachment: 10
    • 4.6 Erosion & Sediment Control: 11
    • 4.7 Stormwater Management: 11
    • 4.8 Floodplain Concerns: 11
  • Section 5. Environmental Monitoring: 14
  • Section 6. Photos: 15
  • Section 7. Professional Opinion: 19
  • Appendix 1. Changes In And About A Stream Approval: 20
  • Appendix 2. Tree Assessment Report: 22
Page 160–183

Section 1. Description of Fisheries Resources Values and a Description of the Development proposal

McKenzie Lake is a fishbearing waterbody within the Craigflower Creek watershed, It has been documented to contain cutthroat trout, threespine stickleback, brown catfish (formerly brown bullhead) (FIDQ - Fish Inventories Data Queries, June 28, 2016).

The shoreline of McKenzie Lake on the property is approximately 45m long.

In the SPEA, above the High Water Mark (HWM) the dominant vegetation is Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), an invasive rose, likely, sweet briar (Rosa rubiginosa) and lawn, St. John's wort is also present, along with thistles, and various ornamentals (e.g. daffodil) and weedy annual plants that are establishing in the bare soil areas (Photos 1, 2 and 3).

Between the HWM and the low water shoreline of McKenzie Lake the vegetation is primarily Pacific willow (Salix lucida), hardhack (Spirea menziesii), red osier dogwood (Cornus stolonifera) with reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) and lawn (Photos 4 and 5).

The development proposal is to install a footpath, elevated walkway and dock to access McKenzie Lake from the proposed house location (outside the Riparian Assessment Area).

The only proposed development activity relevant to the RAR is the footpath that will cross the SPEA via a direct route to minimize the footprint within the SPEA (Photo 6). The path will be approximately 1 m wide, and the surface of the path will be flat stones (Photo 7). The pathway will control pedestrian access through the SPEA, and will pass through an area that consists of Himalayan blackberry and other non-native species. No Habitat Alteration, Damage or Destruction to Fish or Fish Habitat will occur as a result of the path installation.

The following environmental protection best management practices will be implemented during the path installation:

  • Work will be completed during the reduced-risk fisheries window - August 15-September 15, 2016, during a period of forecasted dry weather
  • No clearing of native vegetation is required for installation
  • Exposed soils will be covered, if needed, during rainfall until the path is completed

The elevated walkway and dock are below the High Water Mark and their design and installation are addressed within a Changes In And About A Stream Notification Application that has been approved by the Habitat Officer Kevin Telfer at the Nanaimo Office of Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resources (File: 1003477 and Tracking Number: 100173276) (Appendix 1). The dock design and proposed implementation has incorporated these measures to prevent serious harm to fish by following best practices such as those described in the measures to avoid harm document: (http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/pnw-ppe/measures-mesures/measures-mesures-eng.html).

Page 160–183

Section 2. Results of Riparian Assessment (SPEA width)

Date: May 30, 2016 Description of Water bodies involved: 1, Lake Number of reaches: 1 Reach #: 1

Site Potential Vegetation Type (SPVT)

SPVT Polygons: No (X)

Polygon No SPVT Type
1 TR (Trees)

Method employed if other than TR: (Blank)

Zone of Sensitivity (ZOS) and resultant SPEA

Segment No LWD, Bank and Channel Stability ZOS (m) Litter fall and insect drop ZOS (m) Shade ZOS (m) max South bank SPEA maximum
1 15 15 30 No (X) 15

Comments: The property is located on the northeast side of McKenzie Lake, therefore the ZOS for Shade does not cover this site. The ZOSs for LWD, Bank and Channel and Litter fall and insect drop are both 15m, giving a SPEA of 15m from HWM.

Page 160–183

Section 3. Site Plan

Site Plan of Lot A, Section 3, Highland District, Plan VP72045 showing McKenzie Lake, proposed dwelling, and dock site plan details
Site Plan of Lot A, Section 3, Highland District, Plan VP72045 showing McKenzie Lake, proposed dwelling, and dock site plan details
Aerial Site Plan of the property at 2670 Herbate Road overlaid with property boundaries and topographical contours
Aerial Site Plan of the property at 2670 Herbate Road overlaid with property boundaries and topographical contours
Page 160–183

Section 4. Measures to Protect and Maintain the SPEA

4.1 Danger Trees

A tree assessment was completed for the proposed house for the site (outside the RAA and not subject to the RAR). The tree assessment indicated that no trees in or adjacent to the SPEA need to be removed (Appendix 2, Concrete Jungle, May 12, 2016), and no trees are in the vicinity of the path, elevated walkway or dock.

4.2 Windthrow

There is no clearing of trees proposed adjacent to or in the SPEA, therefore there is no expected increased risk of windthrow in the SPEA, and no additional tree assessment specific to the RAR was completed.

4.3 Slope Stability

The proposed works are not adjacent to steep slopes within the SPEA, therefore no geotechnical assessment has been completed.

4.4 Protection of Trees

Temporary fencing will be installed along the RAA boundary (30m from HWM) to protect the trees within the SPEA during the house construction. The path, elevated walkway and dock will not be installed adjacent to any trees within the SPEA, so no additional tree protection measures are required.

4.5 Encroachment

The owner will install a narrow pathway crossing the SPEA to control pedestrian access through the SPEA to the proposed dock on McKenzie Lake.

A temporary fence (e.g. snow fence) will be installed along the Riparian Assessment Area (RAA) boundary (30m from HWM) to ensure there is no encroachment during the house construction.

The SPEA boundary will be demarcated by signage to be installed at the SPEA boundary (15m from HWM) on the east and west property boundaries, following completion of the house construction. The signage will either be mounted on a fence between properties or on sign posts.

The majority of the SPEA, as well as an area between the HWM and the native shrub fringe along the low water level lake edge, contains invasive, non-native species, primarily Himalayan blackberry, sweetbriar, reed canary grass, and lawn along with various ornamentals, weedy species, and other grasses. The owner proposes to remove invasive species and plant native species in the SPEA in the future to restore the ecological function to the riparian area. A restoration plan will be developed with a QEP at that time.

The owner is aware that the following restrictions exist for activities within the SPEA:

  • Planting native plants only
  • Removal of non-native species is permitted
  • Tree removal is only permitted for hazard trees, which must be identified by an ISA certified arborist
  • No other development activities (e.g. clearing, buildings, road building, etc.) are permitted within the SPEA

4.6 Erosion & Sediment Control

The contractor must implement environmental protection measures to ensure that no contaminants, such as sediment-laden water, enters McKenzie Lake. These measures should include:

  • Locations of SPEA, no-go zones and sensitive areas are marked and communicated to all personnel
  • Scheduling installation activities during dry weather
  • Covering exposed soils (e.g. tarps)
  • Spill response kits are on site when any heavy machinery is working, and operators trained in their use
  • Equipment refuelling at a designated location isolated from aquatic ecosystems
  • Equipment is inspected for leaks prior to beginning work

4.7 Stormwater Management

Surface runoff from the path will infiltrate into the spaces between the path stones and to the sides of the path, no concentration of runoff is expected from the path. Additionally, stormwater capture and runoff control for the proposed house and surrounding area will be located outside of the SPEA.

4.8 Floodplain Concerns

The path is proposed to cross the SPEA to the High Water Mark, where it will meet the elevated walkway to the lake edge. The surface of the path will be flat stones, so it will remain stable if temporarily submerged.

The elevated walkway and dock are outside the SPEA, below the HWM and have been designed to allow light to penetrate the dock and free flow of water beneath the structure. The dock has been designed to meet Ministry of Environment and Fisheries and Oceans Canada best practices.

Page 160–183

Section 5. Environmental Monitoring

The property owners have been informed of their obligation to protect the Streamside Protection and Enhancement Areas (SPEAs) and have agreed to obtain a QEP to provide environmental monitoring during construction.

At a minimum, environmental monitoring should include:

  • A pre-construction meeting on-site with the QEP, property owners, and the project manager or a representative of each construction company to be working independently on site.
  • Site visits timed to coincide with key activities and based on weather conditions to ensure all development activities remain outside of the SPEA, E&SC protective measures are in good working order.
  • Site visits for emergencies, including heavy rainfall events.
  • A post-development visit to inspect works for the completion report.

Photo-point monitoring and site visit checklists should be use for clarity of post-development reporting.

The property owners have been informed of their obligation to submit a post-development report to the RAR Notification System and have agreed to obtain the services of a QEP to complete this task. A post development report will include a field inspection of the development site and SPEA to ensure that the measures in the RAR report and in Environmental Monitoring plans have been implemented and that no damage has occurred or is expected to occur to the integrity of the SPEA. Reports generated by the Environmental Monitor during construction will be reviewed and the site will be photo-documented.

Page 160–183

Section 6. Photos

Photo 1. View to lowland/riparian area and McKenzie Lake
Photo 1. View to lowland/riparian area and McKenzie Lake
Photo 2. Invasive species in lowland zone, lawn, reed canary grass, sweet briar and Himalayan blackberry
Photo 2. Invasive species in lowland zone, lawn, reed canary grass, sweet briar and Himalayan blackberry
Photo 3. Approximate SPEA, through Himalayan blackberry and ornamental species
Photo 3. Approximate SPEA, through Himalayan blackberry and ornamental species
Photo 4. Approximate High Water Mark, through lawn and reed canary grass
Photo 4. Approximate High Water Mark, through lawn and reed canary grass
Page 160–183

Section 7. Professional Opinion

Date: July 6, 2016

  1. I Lehna Malmkvist, RPBio hereby certify that: a) I am/We are qualified environmental professional(s), as defined in the Riparian Areas Regulation made under the Fish Protection Act; b) I am/We are qualified to carry out the assessment of the proposal made by the developer Damon Langlois, which proposal is described in section 3 of this Assessment Report (the "development proposal"), c) I have/We have carried out an assessment of the development proposal and my/our assessment is set out in this Assessment Report; and d) In carrying out my/our assessment of the development proposal, I have/We have followed the assessment methods set out in the Schedule to the Riparian Areas Regulation; AND

  2. As qualified environmental professional(s), I/we hereby provide my/our professional opinion that: a) [X] if the development is implemented as proposed by the development proposal there will be no harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of natural features, functions and conditions that support fish life processes in the riparian assessment area in which the development is proposed, OR b) [ ] if the streamside protection and enhancement areas identified in this Assessment Report are protected from the development proposed by the development proposal and the measures identified in this Assessment Report as necessary to protect the integrity of those areas from the effects of the development are implemented by the developer, there will be no harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of natural features, functions and conditions that support fish life processes in the riparian assessment area in which the development is proposed.

Page 160–183

Appendix 1. Changes In And About A Stream Approval

From: Andres, Selina FLNR:EX Subject: Response: Section 11 Notification ~ 1003477 - McKenzie Lk into Craigflower Cr Date: July 5, 2016 at 10:11 AM

Habitat Officer Kevin Telfer has reviewed your application and has no objections with your proposed works.

Notifications received by this office will be used to plan and carry out on-site inspections and monitoring during and after the works are completed.

This email provides direction under Section 11 of the Water Sustainability Act only, and does not constitute permission or consent under any other Act or Authority. It is your responsibility to consult with Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) and the local government (municipality or regional district) to determine if there are any additional requirements for your proposed works.

Thank you, Selina Andres Administrative Services Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resources 250 751-7399


From: Roden, Jacqueline FLNR:EX Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 11:06 AM To: bryce@blacktreedevelopments.com Subject: Section 11 Notification ~ 1003477 - McKenzie Lk into Craigflower Cr

File: 1003477 Tracking Number: 100173276

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations has received your Water Sustainability Act Section 11 Notification. Please quote the above file number, if you have any questions.

It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that all sections of the notification form are complete, as processing of this notification will not commence until we have a complete application. We remind you that by signing the notification, you are accepting the legal responsibility for this work.

The Habitat Officer will usually confirm acceptance of the application or ask for clarification of details of the project within 10 working days. Once the Habitat Officer has completed the review, you will receive a response that may include further conditions or information. If after 45 days you have not received a response from the Habitat Officer, you may proceed with the work, subject to the following:

We recommend that you also review the following information.

If you plan to remove/salvage fish, you will require a Fish Salvage Permit before work can proceed. Please contact FrontCounter BC at 1 877-855-3222 or go to http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/pasb/applications/process/scientific_fish_collect.html#new for application forms and information. Please provide our office with a copy of your approved permit.

Thank you,

Jacqueline Roden Administrative Assistant Phone (250) 751-7352 Forest Lands and Natural Resource Operations

Page 160–183

Document Images

(48)
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Extracted from: 2016 09 13 Committee of the Whole Agenda