This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Committee of the Whole/Documents/Consulting Arborist Report - 2670 Herbate Road
Appendix

Consulting Arborist Report - 2670 Herbate Road

September 13, 2016Pages 184–1942 sections

A report from Concrete Jungle Forestry Ltd. assessing on-site tree resources and the impact of the proposed development.

2 APPROVAL OF AGENDA
May 12, 2016Identifies 32 Bylaw protected treesRecommends specific tree removals for house and driveway construction

Appendix 2. Tree Assessment Report

May 12, 2016

James Davison MCIP RPP Planner Town of View Royal JDavison@viewroyal.ca

Cc: Damon Langlois (owner 2670 Herbate Rd)

Re: 2670 Herbate Road, Development Permit Application - Consulting Arborist Report.

Introduction:

The owners of an undeveloped 0.45 hectare residential lot located at 2670 Herbate Road in the Township of View Royal are in the process of applying for a Development Permit. In support of the application, Donald Skinner of Concrete Jungle Forestry Ltd. (CJF) has been asked to provide an Consulting Arborist opinion on:

  1. The type and quality of the on-site tree resource.
  2. The impact of residential development would have on the tree resource.
  3. Anticipated tree removals to accommodate a May 12, 2016 preliminary development footprint.
  4. Anticipated tree removals to accommodate Interface Fire Hazard Assessment Report recommendations.
  5. Tree Inventory Details for 32 View Royal Bylaw 695 protected trees impacted by residential development and three (3) groups of small Bylaw protected trees.

Fieldwork for this report was completed on April 28 and May 5, 2016. On May 5, 2016 Mr. Damon Langlois took part in the site visit. During these visits tree inventory details for potentially impacted, bylaw protected trees were recorded and notes were taken about the site's general forest cover and condition.

Site Condition:

2670 Herbate Road is located just north of Thetis Lake Park amongst a small cluster of residences on or near McKenzie Lake (see Appendix - 1: Site Air Photo). From road to lake vegetation changes from an open rocky upper-slope meadow dominated by herbaceous plants and invasive shrubs to a mature mid-slope Douglas fir forest and finally a lakeside riparian area dominated by native species tall shrubs and invasive grasses (see Images 1: Meadow, 2: Mid-slope Douglas fir Forest and Building Site and 3: Lakeside Riparian Area).

Appendix -2: Site Plan Mark-Up; shows that the developable portion of the property constrained by four setbacks:

  1. A 30 meter Riparian Areas Regulation (RAR) mandated setback from McKenzie Lake.
  2. Two 30 meter setbacks protecting wells on the subject property and neighbouring 2700 Herbate Road from septic contamination.
  3. 7.5 meter setbacks along the north and south property lines.
  4. An easement allowing driveway access to 2600 Herbate Road.

Type and Quality of the On-site Tree Resource:

Located in the driest Coastal Douglas fir (CDFmm) biogeoclimatic subzone forest vegetation is dominated by an overstory of mature second growth Douglas fir. Under these are intermediate and overtopped Douglas fir, Arbutus, Garry oak and Bigleaf maple (see Images 1 and 2). Ground cover includes native and invasive species shrubs, herbaceous plants and bryoids (mosses and lichens) (see Images 1, 2 and 3).

Codominant mid-slope Douglas fir reach 30 meters in height and have an estimated age of 140 years and diameters at breast height (dbh) between 38 and 71 centimeters. Smaller Overtopped and Intermediate trees are scattered throughout. Some of these are captured as individuals in the Tree Inventory Table and Site Plan while others are included as 'Groups' on the Site Plan only.

With full dark green canopies CJF awarded all codominant trees a Biological Health rating of 'Good'. Structural Condition Rating was slightly more variable with three awarded a rating of 'Fair' due to a structural defect. All other codominants received a 'Good' Structural rating. Lower in the canopy, reduced light penetration often results in trees with less vigor and a more contorted form. See Appendix - 3: Tree Inventory Table for the details on each inventoried tree and Appendix - 2 for the location of each inventoried tree and three Groups in relation to a May 12, 2016 preliminary development footprint.

The Impact of Residential Development on the Tree Resource:

Mr Langlois has provided a Tree Plan with May 12, 2016 preliminary development footprint. Analysis of the development verses inventoried trees (codominant, intermediate and overtopped) determined that it would require the following tree removals:

  1. Four (4) codominant and intermediate trees for house and driveway construction.
  2. Two (2) trees removed due to a structural defect and location within striking distance of the proposed dwelling.
  3. Eight (8) codominant and intermediate trees less than 10 meters from the proposed development as an Interface Fire Hazard mitigation measure.
  4. Two (2) Potential Tree Removals located adjacent to the upper and lower driveways. Determining the fate of these large diameter codominant trees requires analysis and compromise between the existing and final driveway grades.
  5. Group 3's 4 overtopped Douglas fir.

The Tree Inventory Table shows six Point 1 and 2 tree removals as orange filled cells in the 'Action' column and on the Site Plan as orange filled circles at the trunk location. Fire Hazard mitigation tree removals are shown as Cyan filled cells and circles. Potential Tree Removals are shown as Fuchsia filled calls and circles. Group 3 is shown as opaque orange oval near the driveway turnaround.

Please note that:

  1. The Site Plan Mark-Up contains six (6) trees (red circles) removed under the previous owner's tenure. All were located in or close to the May 12, 2016 development footprint and would likely have been removed anyway.
  2. The Site Plan Mark-Up contains the location of Tree Protection Fencing (TPF) to isolate the 30 meter RAR from the rest of the site. This has not yet been installed.
  3. Additional TPF will be installed to protect other retained Bylaw 695 protected trees when the development footprint, service corridors, construction access and materials storage details have been finalized.

Conclusion:

While the proposed residential development at 2670 Herbate Road will require the removal of a portion of the subject property's Tree Resource much of the site is protected by setback and the proponent's desire to develop while leaving the natural character intact. Resulting in the post-development retention of numerous forest trees. Once the development requirements are finalized CJF will review against inventoried trees to ensure the listed Tree Removals remain valid.

Sincerely,

Donald Skinner M.Sc., R.P.Bio., I.S.A. Certified Arborist. Registered Professional Biologist (#827). I.S.A. Certified Arborist (# PN5907A).

Appendix - 1: Site Air Photo.

Site Air Photo of 2670 Herbate Rd property
Site Air Photo of 2670 Herbate Rd property

Image 1: Meadow.

Photograph showing the meadow area of the property
Photograph showing the meadow area of the property

Image 2: Mid-slope Douglas fir Forest and Building Site.

Photograph of the mid-slope Douglas fir forest and proposed building site
Photograph of the mid-slope Douglas fir forest and proposed building site

Image 3: Lakeside Riparian Area.

Photograph of the lakeside riparian area near McKenzie Lake
Photograph of the lakeside riparian area near McKenzie Lake

Appendix -- 2: Site Plan Mark-Up.

Detailed Site Plan Mark-Up map showing tree tags, setbacks, proposed dwelling, and garage footprints
Detailed Site Plan Mark-Up map showing tree tags, setbacks, proposed dwelling, and garage footprints

Appendix -3: Tree Inventory Table.

Comprehensive Tree Inventory Table for Tag numbers 1 through 32
Comprehensive Tree Inventory Table for Tag numbers 1 through 32
Page 184–194
Tree (Tag) # Type Consol Stem Dia (cm) Height (m) 12:1 Protected Root Zone (m) Symmetrical Crown Rad (m) Crown Rad N (m) Crown Rad S (m) Crown Rad E (m) Crown Rad W (m) Crown Position Action Biological Health Structural Condition Notes
1 Douglas fir 54 6.5 4 Codominant Retain good good location placed by hand
2 Garry oak 11 1.3 1.5 Overtopped Retain fair good Township owned?, location placed by hand
3 Garry oak 49 5.9 7.5 Codominant Retain good fair Township owned, arches over shared driveway - clearance prune, recommend deadwood removal
4 Douglas fir 75 9.0 8 Codominant Retain good good recommend protect roots under gravel parking pad
5 Douglas fir 81 9.7 8 Codominant Retain good good recommend protect roots under gravel parking pad
6 Arbutus 8 1.0 1.5 Overtopped Retain good good location placed by hand
7 Douglas fir 55 6.6 6 Codominant Retain good good protect from construction damage, if parking pad enlarged protect roots to north
8 Douglas fir 26 3.1 4.5 Intermediate Retain good good
9 Douglas fir 48 5.8 6 Codominant Retain good good protect from construction damage, if parking pad enlarged protect roots to north
10 Douglas fir 20 2.5 3 Overtopped Retain fair good location placed by hand
11 Arbutus 37 4.4 10 3 3 3 Intermediate Retain good fair leans over gravel parking pad, prune deadwood
12 Douglas fir 74 8.9 6.5 Codominant Potential REMOVE good good adjacent upper driveway, assess for retention - existing grade verses final driveway grade, if retained protect from root damage
13 Douglas fir 18 2.2 4 Intermediate Retain good good 2600 Herbate owned, low intermediate, location placed by hand
14 Douglas fir 14 1.7 4 Intermediate Retain good good 2601 Herbate owned, low intermediate, location placed by hand
15 Douglas fir 64 30.3 7.7 6 Codominant Potential REMOVE good good 2600 Herbate owned, location placed by hand, measured ht, immediately adjacent proposed lower driveway, informal gravel parking pads either side, assess for retention - existing grade verses final driveway grade, if retained protect from root damage
16 Douglas fir 51 6.1 4.5 Codominant REMOVE good good in lower driveway
17 Douglas fir 49 5.9 4.5 Codominant REMOVE good fair in lower driveway
18 Douglas fir 41 4.9 4 Codominant REMOVE fire good good in proposed driveway, remove
19 Arbutus 18 2.1 3 Intermediate REMOVE fire good good between driveway and turnaround
20 Douglas fir 43 5.2 4 Codominant REMOVE fire good good between driveway and turnaround
21 Douglas fir 65 7.8 6.5 Codominant REMOVE good good centre of lower driveway turnaround, impractical to retain
22 Bigleaf Maple 33 4.0 5 Intermediate Retain good fair basal fork, location placed by hand
23 Garry oak 9 1.1 2 Overtopped Retain good good in septic field - retain if septic field design allows
24 Douglas fir 74 8.9 7 Codominant REMOVE fire good fair septic field, evidence of basal stem decay - with suspect structure remove
25 Douglas fir 49 5.9 6 Codominant REMOVE fire good fair septic field, two stem with poor branch angle - with suspect structure remove
26 Douglas fir 72 8.6 7 Codominant Retain good good in septic field - retain if septic field design allows
27 Douglas fir 56 6.7 6 Codominant REMOVE fire good good house footprint - remove
28 Douglas fir 68 8.2 9 Codominant REMOVE fire good good
29 Douglas fir 53 6.4 6 Codominant REMOVE fire good good
30 Douglas fir 60 30.0 7.2 6 Codominant REMOVE fire good good measured ht / age =~140 years
31 Douglas fir 39 4.7 6 Codominant REMOVE fire good good
32 Douglas fir 38 4.6 6 Codominant REMOVE fire good good
Page 184–194

Document Images

(20)
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Extracted from: 2016 09 13 Committee of the Whole Agenda