Meeting Overview
The Committee of the Whole meeting addressed a wide range of municipal topics, with significant debate focused on two main areas: the structure of advisory committees and contentious development projects. Council received staff reports on the feasibility of expanding advisory committees, ultimately deciding to receive the report for future strategic planning after hearing strong resident arguments both for and against expansion. Key decisions included halting the controversial Polly Place Road End capital project and recommending the use of federal funding for riparian improvements at View Royal Park. Council also received reports on two development applications (335 Stewart Avenue rezoning and 1681 Island Highway refresh), advising both applicants to undertake further consultation and design changes, respectively, before proceeding. Staff delivered reports on Protective Services updates (noting a 52% increase in mental health files), asset management, and traffic calming measures.
Key Decisions
- The verbal update provided by the West Shore RCMP Superintendent was formally received for information.
- THAT the report dated September 6, 2022 from the Director of Protective Services titled "Public Safety Report for July/August 2022" be received for information.
- THAT the report dated November 1, 2022 from the Director of Protective Services titled "Public Safety Report for September/October 2022" be received for information.
- THAT the Building Department Reports for July - October 2022 be received.
- THAT the report dated November 3, 2022 from the Manager of Accounting titled "Vehicle Fleet Replacement Plan Update" be received for information.
Transcript
2515 segmentsLike to call the meeting to order.
And uh good afternoon and welcome to the committee of a whole on a snowy November 8th, 2022.
Um, I'd like to start with a territorial acknowledgement.
We recognize the Luquangan speaking people, known today as the Squamalt Nation and the Songhees Nation, and their historic connections to these lands continue to this day.
And first, a little bit of a discussion about calling in.
So there's a number of folks that have joined us uh this afternoon in chambers.
Thank you.
And there of course are a number of you that I'm sure have tuned in from home.
So the number to call for the uh the phone number, should you wish during public participation to uh make a comment is seven seven eight four zero two nine two two two seven and use conference number seven six six seven nine nine three zero two pound yes pound at the end of that um can I get a motion to approve the agenda second and I see uh Councillor Mattson and Councillor Lemon have approved them and a motion to adopt the minutes of the previous meeting.
Move adoption.
Second.
And Councillor Rogers and Councillor Matheson.
All in favor?
All against.
Carries.
Petitions and delegations.
Seeing none.
Rapidly approaching the public participation period.
So for the public participation, when you hear the chair announce the last four digits of your phone number, mute the live webcast and press star six on your phone to unmute it.
State your name and address, then provide counsel the benefit of your views for a maximum of five minutes.
Any callers?
Anybody in the audience that wishes to Mayor Tobias, we have no phone callers at this time.
Thank you.
I think you, sir, could you uh approach the microphone and uh state your name and your address, please, sir?
I'm the Em Brown.
That'll help a lot.
We have the View Royal Climate Coalition strongly support having more advisory committees in this town.
There are currently two and uh two that actually don't meet very often.
And uh if you refer back to um public satisfaction survey from from 2019, you'll notice that two of the items that stand out on that are that the public want the town to do more about transportation, do a better job of transportation, and the public want the town to take good care of the parks.
I think they're being well dealt with now, but they want you to know that they want you to keep up the good work.
And I think that that means both of those warrant a public advisory committee.
And I'd like to suggest I've heard that we've been talk about there being of the order of five committees in the future, and I know there's been some objections at times about staff time required by advisory committees and therefore cost to the town.
And I would propose there are ways that really involved and energetic committees can reduce that by, for example, providing their own minute taker rather than having a staff person do that.
And also the committees can do research for staff of the town that staff may not have time to do or hadn't thought of doing.
And in the end, that either produces a better product or at least saves staff time.
And uh we've done that in the past back when I was on the Transportation Committee when Emmett McCusker was the engineer here, and uh had good reception for our ideas and uh our research.
And I propose that, in fact, um more committees will not cost the town an enormous amount of money.
Um we've noticed that uh the uh one of the justifications for having seven of you folks here instead of five was that it wouldn't cost a whole lot more for the town.
Well, I propose to you wouldn't cost a whole lot more for more committees, too.
So I'd like you to keep that in mind.
Um there also has been I I've heard an objection that we don't get very many volunteers for our advisory committees in this town.
And I'd like to suggest to you that one of the reasons for that is that it's really hard for present in the present day operation for committee members to feel like their work is valued and um taken account of and put into action at least sometime.
Um it that it is true that that happens, but um it it's not the feeling I get after having sat on your advisory committees for I don't know, about 15 years anyway.
Um earlier on in the in the 2010s, uh sorry, in between 2000 and 2010 or thereabouts, um, it was felt like staff really wanted our input and would take account of it, and the council really wanted our input and take account of it.
After that, it's felt more like uh you guys go and vent your steam over there and we'll carry on business over here.
So I think that you change that attitude and get far more volunteers for this.
And I also think that um having very few committee meetings, in fact, canceling because there's nothing on the agenda, can be remedied, and that would attract more volunteers.
For example, uh, at one point we had um an arrangement whereby committees met every second month, formally here in the town hall, and then in between months, every second month, just the committee members with no staff or town investment or time.
It's a nice structure.
It keeps the committee members working and involved so they don't drift off so that they know their contributions are valued.
The other way to know that committees are valued is the committee needs to have input, maybe even control of the agenda for meetings.
So it's committee member thinks of some problem or some citizen approaches them and said, What about this problem?
They can know that they can put it on the agenda, and there's a really direct and simple way of doing that.
What else did I want to say to you about that?
No, I think I've pretty well covered what I want to say.
Committee members need to know their work is valued and they're being heard.
It's really easy for council to hear what the committee says and then decide to refer it off to staff, in which case it feels like it I mean, no criticism of staff here at all.
It just feels to the committee members like, oh, that's gonna drift into the far reaches of the universe, and how do we ever pull it back?
Thank you, Mr.
Brown.
Okay.
Thank you very much.
Are there others that like would like to speak?
Yes, sir.
Okay, you are next.
Sid, just uh reminder.
When the little red light goes on, their time's up.
Just because you you're afraid I'm going to go on and on.
And I could.
Uh good afternoon, everyone.
My name is Rick Baker.
Um, my wife Jen and I live at 204 One Buddy Road here in View Royal.
I'm going to take a bit of a different tack from the previous speaker.
Um, first of all, congratulations to the new mayor and uh new counselors and uh to the returning counselors.
Wonderful.
I admire what you do in in public life.
Um Jen and I are currently members of the CDAC, the community development advisory committee, and we've been involved for years in many different volunteer activities with the town, including Canada Day, when it was when it was on.
So I'm going to try and go quickly through a few comments here.
I am here to speak about the mayor's interest in setting up a whole bunch of new advisory committees.
And I think this needs to me, honestly, it sounds like a solution-first approach.
I am aware of what the community has said in terms of wanting more input, but I think we have to take a sort of a step back and say, what is it that we're trying to fix here?
Um, what substantive issues have been raised that require this level of citizen engagement?
Um, has there been a huge citizen outcry for input?
Um, there are two communities in uh two committees, excuse me, currently in place, the CDAC and there's one for parks and recreation.
And it's been difficult.
COVID has made it really hard to feel part of a team and to sort of build any sense of momentum around what we're trying to accomplish.
So for sure, um many of us have had our own thoughts about how can we make these committees more effective?
How can we make them more efficient?
Uh, how can we make them more meaningful and beneficial for volunteers?
Um, and I think people in those committees would really like to contribute to how do we make this process work better if the end goal is citizen input?
Um, and I think that working with those two existing committees, and certainly at minimum the chairpersons, would be an ideal place to start.
They've got a perspective, um, it would honor and recognize their contributions that they've made, and they do have a voice.
Um, so I would first look at those two committees uh as a starting point.
How are they working?
What contributions do they make?
How do they inform town policy or direction?
Um, and then whatever comes out of that would direct or advise council and and committees about um what is the direction that we want to take this whole thing in?
Um is it simply to listen to citizen concerns or is it to inform town policy?
Is it provide proactive direction to town?
What is the purpose of the groups?
Administration concerns me.
I read somewhere, and this isn't a criticism here.
I read somewhere that the new mayor feels counselors were spending too much time chairing the committees.
Well, it's my experience is that it's actually citizen co chairs co chair the committee.
And we were always advised that the counselors were there as resource people to answer questions, help us through sticky bits of business.
So the citizens did take on the bulk of the work.
But I feel that the amount of work associated with these new committees could be severely underestimated.
If the premise is to make these working committees, to me that sounds like work no matter who does it.
All that uh administrative minutiae uh that just takes over.
Who takes minutes?
How are the minutes circulated?
How is this whole process made trans um transparent and accountable?
And counselors know lots of stuff.
I've worked with Ron, I've worked with John, in fact, everyone around the table.
They know lots, but there's lots of stuff they don't know.
What happens when questions go to um staff, Sarah and and others here, and that whole process of bringing that that stuff back, that takes work.
And if the if you want to put the counselors in that role, um fine and dandy.
But I feel badly enough for the staff right now.
Um the work that they put in because of who they are and their work ethic, our meetings, they put an extensive amount of work into preparation, an extensive amount of work into answering all the questions that guys like me can ask, which can take you all over the map.
And uh it's a lot of work to follow up on all the different things that we're involved in.
So we can't overestimate or underestimate the amount of administration that could be involved, no matter what sort of format these committees take.
Sounds to me like administration overkill.
Um, and I want to make uh if I try to put a uh chart in my mind of all the communication that could happen with seven committees, a counselor involved in each one, a star chart could be you could be all over the map.
So it doesn't sound like an effective model.
Am I done?
Oh, okay.
But anyhow, I think as a starting point, then I think what would be recommended would be to start with the existing committees, uh, use them as a starting point.
And if you're going to have all these volunteers, make sure that their work is meaningful, beneficial, and valued.
Thank you.
Sorry to go on, folks.
Thank you, sir.
Hello, my name is Jocelyn Skirlach, and I am from 288 Eltham Road and Virroyal.
And guess what I'm going to talk about?
Advisory committee.
So I have several matters that I'd just like to have you, uh Mayor Tobias, to answer if you could.
And one is that I read somewhere on a line of one of your statements online about how you were going to be selecting people for the advisory committee.
And you made the comment that we have a lot of expertise, people who are paid for their expertise in their jobs or in their their uh past jobs uh and I'm wondering if and they they were paid to do this and they could come on these admiss advisory committees and do them free of charge so the the um it's a win win for the the town um but I'm also wondering is that's is that the only kind of people that would be selected for these committees?
That's a direct question then absolutely not okay yeah good okay and then I have another concern, and it's to do with uh uh the the proposed liaison counselors that you have chosen or you put forth the names to go to lead these councils, these uh advisory committees.
Uh and it actually concerns Councillor Rogers.
Um, just before, the week before we had the election, Councillor Rogers happened upon my neighborhood uh Friday afternoon.
We call it happy hour, but it's we nobody gets too jolly.
It's fun, it's a wonderful idea, and it's got us all through.
I live in a complex, Ashley Gate, and it's got us all through COVID supporting each other and looking after each other, and it's a fantastic little neighborhood we have there.
Anyway, um, John uh came to one of these happy hours, and um we he was discussing it was a wonderful platform for him before election.
And one of the questions I asked was about uh island rail.
And John, you will recall that you said there will be no rail on the island, and I am finding that uh as a proponent of the rail, having grown up with rail from grade four going to school and then on to university by rail and by traveling around the world, often using rail, that rail is a wonderful, it cannot be pushed away and not considered.
So I'm asking if, and maybe I should ask Councillor Rogers, the motion was put forward at UVCM recently in September that and it was put forward by View Royal Council to the Prince to the province and to the feds to consider rail on Vancouver Island.
So I'm asking you, are you in a position should it it go ahead that you are the liaison person for advisory committee?
Would you ever advise against the use of rail?
Because you seemed very adamant when I we spoke about it, that it was too expensive and it will never happen.
And my answer to that is it will be a hell of a lot more expensive when people get behind it and realize we should have done this years ago.
So that's a question to you.
How do you feel about now that the motion has moved forward from UVCM?
How do you feel about rail?
Well, I'm not exactly sure how this pertains to the uh topic at hand.
Um, I'm not uh what what part of the agenda are you referring to?
Well, I'm just talking about if you are the liaison person for transportation, which is a very serious big issue.
Yes, indeed.
And um certainly I'm going to provide uh or ensure as much input that uh that needs to be uh uh discussed.
And the recommendations, the motion, the resolution that went to UBCM and the UBCM support for it, um, well, we'll see where that goes.
But in in in um the motion that was before UBCM, I think was significantly different uh than uh what was originated here.
I think um I'm much more in support of the CRD's motion.
The CRD's report, as you may have read that, that is focusing on first First Nations uh issues with respect to the ENN.
That was not discussed in the original motion that V Will put forward.
We did not talk about that.
And secondly the whole point of considering the the options for transportation corridor.
Premier's uh Horrigan's position and I think the NDP's position on on this is probably speaks for itself.
And so yes I have great interest in making sure that the transportation corridor is maximized for the regional and benefit and as well as VWL.
I'm 100% as far as the transportation corridor is concerned.
Thank you.
Good glad to hear that thank you thank you, Councillor Nuss.
Yeah, just in terms of a the the purpose for this portion of the meeting is for people to provide comments on the agenda items.
We also have a question period section at the end, which you know specific questions are probably more appropriate.
But if you have complaints about specific issues or on the agenda, then it makes sense.
Counselor Matson really should not be controlling uh the procedures of the meeting.
Thank you.
Hi, my name's Claire McDougald, 291 View Royal Avenue.
I wanted to speak about the advisory committees.
And um I do acknowledge that I don't have the depth, Mr.
Brown or Mr.
Baker, but I want you to know that in essence I support the establishment of more advisory committees.
I appreciate how it welcomes residents to have more voice in our community.
And I hope that I hope that residents, staff, and council can all realize that this is an important uh opportunity where we're all going to benefit.
Thank you.
Thank you.
That's very good.
5914 Erskine Lane.
I've just moved recently from a house that we've been in for 31 years, and we've been in View Royal for 35 years.
I also wish to speak about the uh advisory committee, of which I do have some experience, having served for at least three terms back in the 90s and early 2000s.
Um I sort of puzzled when I hear some of the potential objections of the when there were probably three, if not four committees, advisory design panel plus the other committees.
Um and we were supplied with all our materials, and I'm talking about sometimes huge agendas.
And of course, back in the day where everything had to be on paper, had to be all printed out and collated and stapled and prepared and gotten to each or every one of us prior to the meetings.
I'm just puzzled how it was possible to do it then, but it seems uh almost insurmountable burden to do it now.
I just leave it at that.
I think advisory committees are really good because each and every one of us live in a neighborhood and we hear things from our neighbors.
And when we come to these um to the uh advisory committee meetings, and these are usually at an earlier stage in the process, people are able to get their input at an earlier stage, as opposed to when an issue is about to go to final vote before council for some matter or other, and at which point any input or comment at that point is almost too late to be of any potential value.
All of us who served on on the committee that I was on were enthusiastic participants of it.
I think we may have had one meeting called uh canceled because there was a lack of quorum.
I can't recall a meeting canceled because of a lack of of uh any agenda material to be discussed.
So again, I'm puzzled.
I don't know how things have changed in the interval between when I served and now as to how matters are dealt with and if things are dealt with more automatically than they might have been years ago.
But um, you know, we did feel very uh welcomed in our input.
It we felt like it made a difference.
Um, if I may, if I still have a minute and a half left here to say a specific matter.
I live on Erskine Lane, having moved there at the end of the summer.
And I don't know, as I say, I'm new there, so I have no idea what kind of input people have received on this sort of thing there.
But right now, there's probably about 80 cars that come up and down that street a day.
And there's a uh flag person there who's there to direct construction traffic in and out.
But he's sitting there a lot of the rest of the day, and he's told me after a long conversation how many um near misses he's seen.
It's a narrow, windy with a drop.
Um poor sight lines, really, is what I put it down to simply.
It's an accident waiting to happen.
Now, when there are several hundred more homes there, and I'm not debating that that we need that or not.
What I'm saying is if you're gonna do something like hundreds of homes on a small street, things have to be done to make sure that the street is safe for everybody.
As it stands right now, it's not.
And as they say, this is the sort of issue if there was an advisory committee and the matter was coming up at an early stage, we could address it rather than at a point where I don't know if it's too late to do anything or if anything's going to be done or not.
So to me, it just speaks to the point and the value of advisory committees.
Thanks.
Thank you, sir.
Anybody?
Anyone online?
Mayor Tobias, we have no callers at this time.
Thank you.
That concludes public participation period and business items.
We're at 661.
I'll pass the chair to uh councillor Brown.
Thank you, Mayor Tobias.
It's certainly an honor to be uh chair of this uh uh Protective Services Committee uh after serving for 32 years as an RCMP member, then 18 years as a bio officer.
It kind of seemed appropriate.
Thank you very much.
Um, I'd like to thank uh our our staff, uh members and protective services.
Certainly, Chief Hurst and his crew uh have always done an excellent job for us, and also his volunteers, his numerous volunteers.
I've seen firsthand some of your action in the summer.
Thank you very much.
Um and also your bile officer uh uh Jim Henley.
I've seen him out and about uh doing an excellent job.
It's great to see that visibility uh out in his bike and even painting some of the graffiti over, which is which is really awesome.
And uh Todd, Todd Preston's our superintendent, thank you very much for the service that you provide.
And as you're aware, the RCMP is a huge family, and I want to pass my condolences for the loss of Shaelyn Yang in Burnaby.
Uh again, it's a big family.
When you lose a family member, it uh it hurts us all very, very deeply.
And also I'd like to thank you for sending uh the three officers in Red Surge uh to our inaugural meeting last week.
Um, as people probably aren't aware, the RCMP was formed in 1860, no, 1873, and Jerry Potts was the guide at that time.
And I did mention to the three officers that came that I Jerry Potts was a terrible PIT partner, but unfortunately they didn't even know who Jerry Potts was.
But thank you very much, and uh I'd like to turn it over to you, uh Todd, for uh a verbal report.
Mr.
Mayor, uh Council, thanks very much for having me.
Um, welcome to those that are new to council.
I look forward to working with those uh that have worked for uh the last four years.
Um not sure how we should start.
Maybe I'll start by telling you a little bit about the detachment uh area, first of all, for those that are new.
So the West Shore detachment's made up of uh seven municipalities, five communities, two First Nation.
Um it's probably one of the most complex detachments in the country because of that, but I think it also allows for uh tremendous uh efficiencies uh as well.
Uh and currently I would suggest it's probably a role model for for many communities uh moving forward.
We currently have about 103 officers uh with more on the way next year as well.
I have over 150 staff.
Um we police, I think it's between about 85 and 87,000 uh people here in the West Shore.
And obviously that uh that number is growing rapidly.
Um myself, I've been the uh the officer in charge for about four and a half years, a 25 year service with the RCMP.
Um started in Alberta.
I've worked in the Yukon and all sorts of uh detachments throughout uh British Columbia and Western Canada.
Um I'll delve into this first of all, just a quick uh highlights here, which I normally do, and then I think I'd like to leave a little bit of time if we could for some QA's, if if that's right with you, Mr.
Mayor.
Councillor Brown, is it chair?
Yes, by all means.
I think there will be some questions.
Thank you.
Sorry, thanks.
Uh thanks, Counselor.
Um I generally go over uh some of the highlight files that we've had uh just for the last month, just to kind of give you a real general overview of some of the typical calls that uh that our members are going to.
Um on October 2nd, we had a vehicle park at Adams Place.
Two males were passed out in the car, uh drug pipe was visible to the driver.
Both males were arrested, searched, drug paraphernalia and methamphetamine, heroin cannabis were seized as a result.
October 2nd, multiple calls were uh received at the Shell gas station on 498 Island Highway.
The victim noticed someone stealing uh his car.
The victim grabbed onto the suspect who was driving away and dragged that uh that individual about 100 feet.
Uh the victim had injuries.
The suspect uh stole the vehicle and drove into a parked camper van, then continued erratically in and out of traffic on Island Highway, colliding with another vehicle.
He was followed by a second vehicle, stopped on Price Road, and officers arrested the suspect who's since been charged.
Uh October 3rd, a vehicle was pulled over driving erratically.
Um, we did a roadside screening um device was utilized and the individual failed.
It was issued a 24 hour prohibition.
Uh that vehicle um searched.
Uh the vehicle search uh resulted in the seizure of a collapsible uh baton found on the driver, metal, brass knuckles, uh, and a knife found in the vehicle, along with a small baggie of white powder believed to be uh drugs.
The driver was arrested and issued an undertaking for court.
Um, on October 9th, the uh we had a report of an erratic driver driving onto the sidewalk near Craig Flower.
The officer pulled the vehicle over, and as a result of a screening device, the issue uh the individual issued a 24-hour prohibition for drug impairment.
Uh October 12th, we had a $400 shoplifting at Bosley's Pet store.
The member is able to ID the suspect who continuously shoplift from that store since 2019.
It's been a chronic problem, this individual, and we are seeking that individual who's currently arrestable for theft.
October 16th, we had a vehicle uh report of a vehicle that had hit a parked car.
2951 Craig Flower Road.
Driver determined to be impaired by drug and admitted to relapsing using fentanyl.
On October 18th, the mom of a 16-year-old advised that her daughter received photos from a male uh adult, uh, nude photos.
And um a friend of the daughter also received similar photos.
The um the concerning thing, well, obviously, uh in addition, another thing that was concerning was this individual was a coach in our community.
And uh obviously we we believe that there was a child learning component to this, and so our newly formed special victims unit uh has taken custody of that file.
Um on October 23rd, uh report of a male wearing a ski mask knocking on doors in the neighborhood of Gibraltar Bay, then waiting in the front yard for uh homeowners holding a knife.
The officers located the mail, arrested the male, knife was seized.
The male knows uh this individual uh who's sorry, very well known to the police, has severe mental health issues, and intentionally gets arrested by police.
Um unfortunately scares the beejes out of uh the public.
So that individual was taken to um uh for medical help.
Umtober 25th, male was arrested for masturbating in his vehicle at the Victoria General Hospital, uh, not too far from the children's wing in the hospital.
The suspect was not a uh was a contractor.
Uh an undertaking was issued for that individual to uh to attend to court.
And October 30th, we had a report of a sex assault female victim, and the suspect uh was known to the victim, and we're currently working with that with our special victim unit as well.
So those are uh you know certain files uh of interest from October in the town of the Royal.
Our violent crime, I'm happy to report, is down 20% from last year.
And again, as I told previous counsels, you know, we really do try to target on certain individuals, prolific offenders, and certain individuals that are prone to violent behavior, property crimes, and that sort of thing.
So, you know, I'm I'm always proud to be able to come back and tell you that hey, you know, we've got a 20% decrease in uh in violent crime.
We have a our property crime unit.
I know they've been uh very busy as well.
Um, and you're down 21% decrease as well on them last year.
Um, and that's probably extraordinary considering the amount of mental health files that precipitate uh theft files.
And so they've done a phenomenal job.
And again, identifying certain individuals and targeting those individuals.
The hospital, you know, last year to date, we had 198 occurrences there.
So that was an increase of sorry, 198 this year, and last year we had 188 to date.
So not a real dramatic increase.
1010 files at the hospital there.
The casino, we had a 15% increase, but that's only nine files uh from last year.
But that's so 71 times to put it in perspective.
71 times we've been to the casino for um for files this year.
Probably the most um alarming but not surprising statistic I'd suggest is that um files with a mental health component.
So those include files such as check well-being, missing missing persons, and mental health act.
Uh, we've had a 52% increase uh year over year from last year.
So an increase of almost 100 uh 100 files from last year.
So I don't think that comes as any shock to anybody in this room.
Um it's uh it's a chronic problem.
It's gonna have to be uh addressed at all levels of government.
I don't think there's a silver bullet in fixing this uh this problem.
Perhaps I'll stop there and uh I can answer some questions, counselor.
Uh Mayor Tobias?
It was announced recently that the uh provincial government is going to be um contributing to security at hospitals.
How will that affect um you know the response times and the amount of times that that um your officers have to wait?
Uh will that have a positive effect on freeing you up a little bit?
Um likely not until they change um the legislation to allow for peace officer status at because the legislation says we a peace officer has to take this individual to a doctor.
Um, and so you know that can be two hours.
On typically it is a two hour plus wait.
So, you know, as I told counsels before, you got $200,000 police officers, so that's what that's what uh we cost.
You pay 70% of that.
Um, and we're sitting there basically as security guards um at the hospital.
Um, yeah, it's a major issue.
Um, it's it's a real major issue in this particular area here.
I know in in other jurisdictions it's not um not as bad, especially the smaller um areas.
I know that they tend to get their patients in and out a lot quicker, but for whatever reason, just the the sheer volume and and uh certainly no knock at the the the doctors if you go to an emergency room, it's not just an emergency, it's a triage for mental health right now.
Um, and so that's that's a significant issue for us.
So again, we've we've lobbied for for change.
Um, if we could turn somebody over um um at the hospital and leave, that would be great.
And that used to be the way until I think there was an incident uh that happened where there was a deceased an investigation led to significant change in that.
And I think obviously the probably the best fix, but uh not an easy fix would be to actually have a facility for mental health individuals, not a emergency room triage in them.
Counselor Lyman Thank you.
Hi, Inspector, nice to see you.
A couple of questions.
Uh the the um person with the knife that is scaring the bejesus out of the public would that be um we there was an email circulating in my neighborhood about a fellow with a hello um with a balaclava wearing a balaclava and uh threatening threatened one woman in particular with a knife would that be the same circumstance you know i i i can't say for certain right now but um that would certainly be a strong probability that uh because I don't think we have we don't have too many people with balaclavas with knives going around scaring people got thankfully uh but yeah I I we could I can certainly check into that for you after yeah I would you didn't mention the balaclavas so I was just well I'm sorry I apologize so that so that was very well yeah that was and give me a call for me if you need to have more answers on it.
Right, right.
And and because for you know we almost never have members of the public in chambers during um committee of the whole.
I'm wondering if you could briefly explain uh the recent report in which View Royal was seen to have one of the highest crime rates in the region.
So if you're referring to crime severity, if that's what you're referring to?
Yeah, well, yeah, I'm I'm I guess crime severity.
It was sitting it was an article.
It is.
I believe that's what you're talking about.
Yeah, a month or two ago.
Um and so I'll give you a and it's a great question, actually, because it's it's one that not not a lot of people understand, and and most police officers don't understand it, including myself uh until a number of years ago.
But um so the crime severity and so how we measure um the crime severity index, uh and we say we, the province and and the statistics people, they look at crime severity, and I'll read you this.
Uh, crime severity index takes into account both the volume and the seriousness of crime.
The index is calculated with weight assigned to each offense that is derived from the average sentences handed down by criminal courts.
The more serious the average sentence, the higher the weight for that offense.
As a result, more serious offenses have a greater impact on changes in the index.
All criminal offenses that are included in this index crime refers to acts or emissions prohibited by the criminal code.
So they give certain weights and then they look at the offenses that were committed in your area.
And you could get, if you have a couple of very serious offenses, um that could certainly sway or or um swagger your your uh crime severity index over the year, if that makes any sense.
Okay, yeah, it does.
So it's it's a matter, so it's not it's not a uh broad sweep of pure oil, is is crime ridden it was a a a piece in time a moment in time that was well you know and if I can speak candidly the you know I've I've been here four and a half years I've noticed more and more um events taking place in View Royal and I suspect it's probably because of the push I mean most recently we had a push of individuals that were uh homeless on east Vancouver the fire department um shut that down Victoria saw an influx.
And I've I've personally spoken with individuals that came over from the lower mainland Vernon and that have started to take refuge in the in the West Shore.
Particularly, this is the first stop from from Victoria.
And I think you're starting to see more and more individuals creeping in from downtown.
It's becoming more and more violent downtown.
And it's when you talk to the these individuals that are homeless and suffering from mental health and addictions, they're scared of being downtown, a lot of them.
And they're so they're pushing out this way.
So if that provides any perspective.
Okay.
Thank you very much.
Constable Rogers.
Yes, uh, thank you.
Hello again.
Um, picking up on that point, um, the the uh increase of homelessness um and uh the uh uh camping and shelters and whatnot, um uh we've heard from uh our fire chief about um uh issues, criminal elements under the bridges.
And um I'm hoping shortly that we'll have a plan on on uh trying to address those and and bring about more accountability, more safety on that.
And certainly recommendations.
Um I know we're gonna be meeting at the end of November, and I hope that would be a topic you could come to uh for all of uh the your invitees, and we can have that discussion.
Absolutely.
Yeah, when you get down to it.
My second question.
Um during the uh the campaign, um, I heard uh a lot about uh street racing on the Trans Canada.
Very significant issue.
Um the uh amount of racing that was going on every night um for a couple of hours at a time uh from Thetis Lake all the way down to Helmcken, probably uh even on the on the island highway.
And um any ideas or suggestions how we can bring some accountability and and control of that uh potentially dangerous situation.
Absolutely, in terms of enforcement.
Um so is it on the Trans Canada Highway that you're suggesting it's it's occurring?
Pardon me to say that again.
Is it on the Trans Canada Highway?
Yep.
Yeah.
So I'm I'm wondering if uh URSU has also got that message because I've seen a significant increase.
And for those of you who don't know what URSU is, it's the integrated road safety unit.
Uh it's a um provincially or ICBC funded program where RCMP um lead the program, but we have our partner agencies from Sanach, Victoria, and we work together collaboratively to provide road safety on primary highways in and around the CRD.
I've noticed a huge increase personally on the highways um in the exact areas that you're talking.
So I'm wondering if they've also uh are in tune with what you're saying, but I'm also happy we have a four-person um traffic unit.
And if you give me you know more specific times, I'd be happy to, and they would be happy to sit out and and uh try to address that issue for you.
Sure.
Well, neighbors are living in on um uh nursery hill are happy to let you stake out with their how at their house and monitor the traffic issues.
Wouldn't we the first time, yes.
Not a problem.
Councillor Kowalewich.
Thank you, Superintendent.
Uh we know that unhoused individuals right now are at the forefront of uh most of our minds and in the media.
Uh right here on View Royal Council, we discussed the prospect of a shelter in the West Shore.
I'm just wondering your opinion as the detachment commander for the West Shore CMP.
Uh how do you think that uh a shelter on the West Shore could help uh or hinder uh our our homeless population and uh in relation to uh offenses?
That is the thanks, Counselor.
That's the the second time I've been asked that question today from municipalities uh in this area um the the individuals that we're referring to um make no mistake it's not illegal to be homeless um we can't police our way out of homelessness i nobody has more sympathy and empathy for individuals that are suffering from mental health and addictions if you if you put a if you build it these individuals will come they will be placed there um and when they um choose to leave they will be in your area and currently with the per state of the provincial resources available for assistance with these individuals.
Oftentimes they're not getting their assistance that they need to function um without law, without lawlessness, sorry, and without committing offenses, break-ins to survive, stealing, that's just the reality.
Um, I I'd be cautious in in giving an opinion whether or not we should have a shelter here.
I think that's a municipal and provincial decision.
I can tell you from a policing standpoint, it will bring more files to the RCMP if you have shelters in place here.
Um and that's I'm not saying that's a bad thing.
Um just saying that's that's in my 25 years, that's an experience, that's the reality.
Well, certainly, and and your lens is important, and there's so many other lenses that come into effect when making a decision like that.
Thank you.
Uh, my next uh question to you is uh with the recent deaths of uh five police officers in the last probably month across Canada.
I'm just wondering how your membership's dealing with that.
Uh the last member being from the RCMP, of course.
Uh, what kind of resources you have in place?
How's the pulse of uh your detachment right now?
Thanks, uh thanks for the question.
As uh my friend Councillor Brown suggested, uh, you know, it doesn't matter the uniform.
Um we're family brothers and sisters, shoulder to shoulder.
And um, you know, it doesn't matter police police, military family, uh ambulance, fire department.
We're all we're all the same.
Um yeah, anytime you have a devastating blow like that, and of course, um it resonates in this detachment with with Sarah of uh from before, so it kind of relives some uh some horrible memories.
Uh yeah it's it's been tough not just for the RCP but you look out east and and it was there was an onslaught of members there.
I think there's three in in a week there that got uh murdered um it's been difficult we do have it's other 16 or 18 members off right now um out of 103 and gotta be cautious you know obviously I'm cognizant of the snowball effect with you know uh the workload and the stress being piled on and piled on and piled on um with other members uh I mean all in all I I think the membership the morale is really good at the detachment.
Um but the mental health thing, um, you know, it's one of those things we never talked about 10, 15, 20 years ago.
It's not even an issue to talk about it anymore, which is healthy and refreshing.
But uh, thanks for the the question.
I got last kick at the cat being the chair.
Uh just uh just I don't expect a big report, but a community police stations.
Uh there's over 60 in the province, and there's about nine, I think, on Vancouver Island.
My last, not my second last posting was in Burnaby when we divided up into four quadrants.
And there's there's a variety.
Some of these community police stations are totally manned by volunteers.
Some are basically substations.
I know Pitt Meadows is in the process of converting theirs into a regular detachment.
They're in the process now of uh buying a building to house a brand new detachment in Pitt Meadows.
But um, just any idea from your because I'm a little dated now from the Burnaby experience chart.
Um, pros and cons uh about community police station uh for the town of Uroy.
Sure.
Um, you know, in reference to Pitt Meadows, I believe there was a fracture in the relationship, if I correct me if I'm wrong between um Eagle Ridge and Ridge Meadows.
And I think that ultimately led to that detachment being uh built.
As I said before, you have without question the most efficient detachment in the province.
You have seven, you have one, you have one of me, you have one uh police chief, you have one front counter, you have one.
So, in terms of if efficiency in terms of costing financially, um with no question, we're the the most efficient.
In terms of um delivering of service, and I think that's probably more what you're referring to.
Um, you know, the one thing that we've been very um proud of and cognizant of is, you know, no offense to the fire hall.
Uh we're not fire hall police, you know, we don't need fire hall policing in in terms of we wait for a call.
Um our members are expected to be on the road um writing up files as they come in.
Now there is obviously time they have to come back to the detachment to write up files to deliver you know people into cells and there's some some administrative work that has to be done there.
But in terms of visibility, um the members they know that their job and every every morning they're assigned.
So if there's no calls that they will be parked in View Royal or Callwood and certain hotspot areas.
For instance, if Counselor Rogers says, hey, there's a you know the there's speeding on this road or there's a a school zone, that's where the member sits there to be efficient with their time.
And oftentimes they'll just sit there and write up files.
And nobody knows it's not doing radar, but you know, perception is everything in policing.
Um and so there's obviously some value to having community police stations, they come at a cost of resources.
Um I'm certainly not opposed to a community police station.
I would never recommend moving um you know uh units and sections out of the main building uh just because of it from a communication and again a costing and efficiency standpoint.
But in terms of community policing, um, if you thought that they would be advantageous to have people that could come in and it'd be more inviting for people to come in and speak with a police officer if that's what you're yeah there, there's a there's a variety of uh models out there, and uh I mean I have a lot of ideas in my own head but it's it's something to be discussed further with amongst counsel I think and and decide if if that's a feasibility because even if it's a a workstation or someone could come in and do some work or um some minor issues you know some uh minor thefts or uh found property uh those kind of complaints uh even if it's manned by a trained and uh security cleared volunteer uh again there's quite a range of of different types of community police stations but thank you thank you yeah no and and I'd certainly I'd be happy to have a coffee and talk about that more for sure.
Thank you.
Further questions very much.
Thank you.
It was uh nice meeting uh those that I haven't met before.
So thank you.
Members of council.
Welcome to uh councillors McKenzie and Brown and look forward to working with you over the next four years, Don.
Uh we have a we have a history that goes back many, many years.
So I'm pleased to see you sitting in that too many years sitting in that seat.
Unfortunately, Superintendent Preston left, and I was gonna say some nice things about him before he said firemen just sit around and wait for things to happen, but that's not true.
We're very busy all the time.
Isn't that correct, John?
There we go.
Uh, just for the benefit of um our chair and uh counselor McKenzie, fire and bylaw reports out uh every two months.
Um January, March, so on every two months.
Uh we cover off uh what's happening in the individual divisions of the department in fire and rescue, and then of course uh a bylaw summary.
There are statistics attached to uh the reports, and generally in the past I've I've reported at the end of each report with some comments, but what I've done is I've consolidated those comments and I've put them in the CAO report for our CAO to uh pass on to you at a high level.
Of course, I'm available for any questions.
Um, before you were two reports, there's a July-August 2022 and a September-October uh report.
We didn't report out in the summer um and or in um just as September October.
So we combined the two reports.
This is a high level um snapshot of the department activities over the past two months for July of August.
Uh just a couple of um noteworthy issues.
Uh, we did resume our public education component at the station.
That's uh visitors to the station, public education tours, station tours, and um public education for for children in schools.
Uh as the COVID uh restrictions lifted, we two uh sort of pivoted and relaxed our conditions in the building.
We also note just notable files.
There's a police aspect, but then fire gets called to deal with the injuries sustained.
Of note, you'll notice in the on page two, the training division, you'll notice that there's quite a bit of work done with respect to the training of volunteers.
That is a significant component.
As well, our emergency program is very busy in working with uh not only our own program, but with the city of Collwood.
We do have a contractual agreement where we we help them out with their emergency program, uh, their radio program, and we have a joint emergency support services team that looks after people who have been displaced by fire or uh other emergency situations.
Um just the one significant event uh worth noting in the September-October.
We had a large fire uh on Songhe's Nation.
Uh it was an accidental fire.
Uh, however, the um the trailer in question had over 30 propane bottles inside the building.
So when crews arrived, the fire was significant.
Um, people were jumping out windows, and there was loss of uh life to animals inside the uh residents.
Um fortunately, no firefighters were injured.
One civilian was transported to the hospital with injuries.
Um, if I could speak to bylaw, and I'll just touch on what the superintendent uh mentioned regarding mental health issues in the town.
That that is becoming a significant issue for us.
A lot of medical calls are being uh consolidated with mental health issues.
Um, and I I, you know, I can't reiterate obviously the importance and the support I have for RCMB because they are our frontline and they are the pointy end of the stick when it comes to these types of calls.
You know, we spoke of uh the tragic death of the member in Burnaby and ironically that day um a local RCMP here and our bylaw officer confronted an individual at the end of Hallowell Road in a tent, a female who was uh living there.
And when she opened up her tent, she came out of the tent with a 21-inch sword and a machete.
And that's what our bio officer faced.
So that said, uh I have met with other directors and I have met with the superintendent to discuss uh where we're going now with um with our bio officers, our parks workers, our engineers, highways workers, any of our contracts that are dealing with these issues in an effort to make sure that our our staff are safe.
And obviously that includes fire and rescue because uh on a weekly basis we're dealing with mental health issues whether they're whether they're homeless or they're in the home and drug addiction and and violent issues so that is uh at the front of our our list right now is making sure our staff are safe uh statistically you'll note that we've exceeded last year's uh calls for service and we're on a trajectory now for the busiest year in the 75 years the department's been in existence um it used to be the majority of calls for medical calls.
That number is actually, it's it's declining a bit.
Uh there have been some shifts in the calls we attend.
However, there seems to be a an increase in other and uh miscellaneous and uh people not knowing what to do in a situation where they just pick up the phone and lack of know they pick up the phone, call the fire department.
And those calls are 24-7.
As I said to the uh the mayor elect just before you were sworn in, sir, we were kind of a department that we're proud that we're no call too small.
And if somebody calls, we'll we'll come out and and do the best that we can.
At this point, I again I give just a brief overview.
You've probably read the reports, you've seen the stats.
I know Councillor Rogers has seen the stats.
He enjoys the stats, and I'm uh open to any questions that the chair and members of council have.
Counselor Mattson.
Okay, thank you.
Thanks, Chief.
I feel like the stats.
You two like the stats?
Yes.
So I did have a couple of questions.
One of them is on training.
So first off, kudos on all the training that's done.
It's always impressive to see how much uh training, how many hours people spent doing training.
So I was curious in terms of in-house versus uh going outside.
So, like, do you have sort of a rough idea of the percentage of training that's happened, sort of within the staff you currently have versus sending people out for training?
Good question.
So under the current under the current program, the staff are required to train two and a half hours each day, day shift and night shift.
So that's whatever staff members in four members is about 20 hours a day.
Um day shift and night shift.
The out-of-out-of-station courses could be anything from live fire training at Otter Point or to Vancouver obviously with COVID all that was clawed back pretty heavily and a lot of it is online and and zoom and correspondence type training that will ramp up again in in 23 as the as the world opens up we try to do as much training as we can in house obviously to to limit expenses when you travel and you put people in hotels and out of town it it costs significant money and with 30 plus staff that can add up quite quickly and eat a lot of your budget so we try to do as much training as we can in house uh there are courses though that we can't we can't train in.
There are class three driver's license pumps and pumps.
There are courses that we have to use contractors for, and some of those courses are outside the station.
We try to keep those uh locally, either at Langford, Otter Point, or we share resources amongst the town and the other fire departments.
Okay.
Thank you.
My other question is on structural fires.
Yes.
So two basically questions.
Is there a s any specific type of facility or type of home that you get more fires in than others?
And do you get an increase during the winter with people plugging in heaters, et cetera?
And the last question was I noticed that in 2021 and 2012, you were probably about 70% higher in terms of the number of structural fires than the the previous years that were noted.
So I'm just wondering if that's a trend or how you kept how you have Google calculating us.
Yeah.
What do we have to worry about.
So the the predominant cause of fires now uh there are they are residential fires and they're attributed to uh kitchen fires uh or accidental, uh whether they be electrical or an accidental fire.
What we found is there's an awful lot of distraction these days with people, whether it be cell phones or or whatnot's going on in their life, and they get distracted easily.
Prior to that, it was smoking, uh, you know, homes that had no smoke alarms.
So we're getting into a situation now where we have people who are distracted.
Um, you know, they they put something on the stove, they head out to work, or they go out to the yard, they forget, they get distracted, and they have a kitchen fire.
So that's predominantly the the number one would be our residential fires.
Then, of course, after that is is commercial fires, which are they're few and far between, but when they happen, they're they're quite significant.
Now you're you're absolutely correct.
We have had an increase in structural response, but I also note if you look down at the last call on their council where it talks about mutual aid and automatic aid.
Um, those numbers are direct reflections of so the 78 is a reflection of the number of structural fires we have responded to.
That also includes into Calwood and into Langford, and vice versa, them responding into V Royal.
Um so that that would explain that number why there's been such a sharp increase.
It's about, I'd say about, we probably respond 10 times a month on average into Calwood or Langford or a squai Malt.
To give you an example, uh on Friday was a busy day for crews, and they they attended three fires in a squimalt because they were tied up on other fires.
And then we attended some fires on the weekend uh in Langford.
So it it it ebbs and it flows.
Um right now, uh the area chiefs Callwood Langford Bureau.
We meet, we talk almost daily, and we meet uh every two weeks, and we discuss these numbers to ensure that one department isn't being overburdened or taxed or weighted with another department.
And right now, numbers are pretty consistent across the board.
Okay, good, thank you.
Counselor Rogers.
Thank you.
Hi, Paul.
Hello, John.
We dodged the bullet again in the summertime with um not having really serious uh forest fires.
We didn't have the wind factor that uh would create uh a firestorm or a havoc.
Um and and I also see the correlation in uh if you correct me if I'm wrong with uh homeless camps being um probably a possible cause.
Some of the yeah, the the these let me just I'm gonna go back up here into my uh my July August.
We did have some brush fire mill hill, uh brush fire in Thetis Lake, Francis King.
Francis King was an accidental fire, but the the Thetis Lake and the uh the the um the mill hill fires were directly attributed to uh camping in the parks, whether that's homeless or that's um you know people partying and camping in the park, uh there is a component to it.
These aren't they aren't accidental fires.
They're you know, as a result of leaving a campfire undattended or some other nefarious act in the park that causes the fire.
Okay, thank you.
Mm-hmm.
Yeah.
Um again uh congratulations on the uh very successful Halloween night.
Uh the attendance was absolutely remarkable.
Really nice to see the uh what 21 uh members that were there to help out.
Amazing.
What was uh also remarkable was um the safety of uh the crosswalk that's uh pedestrian controlled crosswalk you know I was really remarkable how um all those individuals that were moving um um from one side of the highway to the next to to gain access to the fire department.
And I'm really, really pleased that we've been able to put that uh that light available year round.
I recall the uh the difficulty, extraordinary difficulty to get consent and and uh and finally get it in.
So I'm I'm I'm really pleased to see the uh the safety that it provides today.
Um just another question.
You had a interesting visitor at the fire hall uh on Halloween.
Can you tell us about that?
I did.
Uh so I I had this young uh this young lady standing in the parking lot for about 15 minutes watching me.
I was having a conversation with one of the residents, and I actually said to the resident, I said, This is kind of odd.
There's these two young girls, probably 16, 17 year olds.
They're obviously talking about me and staring, and finally, one of them comes over and she says, uh, she says, Hi, you don't remember me, do you?
Do you know who I am?
Of course, panic sets in.
I live on paddock.
And I uh I said, No, I don't know who you are.
I don't recall who you are.
And she said, Oh, I'm my name's Katrina.
You rescued me from a house fire 10 years ago.
So uh we had a really good conversation.
Uh it was unexpected.
It was a it was a great surprise.
She's doing well.
She uh she's finishing school, she has a job, she lives in the same home that uh she was living in at the time of the fire.
Um, you know, I said, uh, you don't you don't get second chances like that uh in life because when she was pulled from the fire, she was obviously in a cardiac arrest and and she was deceased.
So to get a second chance like that, and then for her to come up was a pretty special moment.
We uh took a picture together and I wished her well and welcomed her back at any time.
And uh it was it was definitely nice to uh to close that loop that she'd uh been successful in life so far.
I told her she has to she has to maintain that trajectory and and make sure she um she doesn't waste that.
What you don't mention is the fact how you rushed into the burning building to uh find it.
You don't mention that.
We're just doing her job, boss.
Yeah, just amazing.
Paul, just uh one uh last question.
Um, will you uh be um be available for those of members of council that want to take a tour, a detailed tour of the facility, and um give us an idea of what's happening gonna happen in the next four years?
You're you're more than welcome to come on a tour, and if you'd like to discuss what's happening uh over the next four years, I would defer you to my CAO, who'd be more than happy to attend with me and book that appointment in conjunction with me.
There we go.
How do how they do?
Pretty good?
Yeah more than more than happy John um and uh it uh yeah I it's uh again it's your for a fire station it's uh we're pretty proud of that building and the and the people work there so you're you're always more than welcome to come by and and see the building and and have a cup of coffee.
Counselor Lemmon you had a question uh a comment and a short question and Halloween was big for you that they um send off of Rob Smith as well.
So absolutely yeah, so the whole evening was kind of momentous.
It was good.
Rob was uh Rob is the longest serving volunteer in the history of the department.
He uh Stan Bell did thirty-six years and Rob Smith did thirty-six years in one day.
So Rob Rob has the honor of being the longest serving uh volunteer in the history of uh the department, which is which is commendable.
He wore his old uh his original turnout gear, which is terrifying.
With ropes hanging up.
I was like, yeah.
So it was it was great.
It was uh it was nice to see him.
He's gonna stay with the emergency program and and still come out on drill nights and and help the recruits out.
So we're pleased that he's gonna stick with us.
Yeah.
Quick question.
Um the 13 bylaw um park visits, were they were they camping related?
They could be.
Um I can get you the details on those.
Um they could they could be anything from an um someone complains of an off-leash dog and Jim goes down and looks for it.
I'll get you the what the uh the actual the actual numbers were, whether it was a homeless issue or whether it was a it could be it could be anything in the park, dumping garbage in the park.
Yeah, these lots of that.
Okay, thank you, Paula.
The C or D uh contract with the C R D for animal control.
Yes.
In a previous year's when I was in the position of chief biofficer, I used to come here quarterly and make a report.
And it would be nice to see that even once a year, even uh I did talk to Mark Grew, who's my my replacement today, and said I would mention it tonight.
And he's quite happy to come um perhaps quarterly, I think maybe March, June, September, December, uh to make a short report because I'd be interested in knowing you know what kind of animal activity is happening out there.
More than happy.
I could I'll arrange that through our contract is uh due apparently by the end of this year.
I think you there was some mention that it was next year, but the contract is due for renewal at the end of this year.
Perhaps we can sit down and discuss animal control, and I get your uh your sage advice on where we should go with that.
Good.
Thanks, thanks.
Any further questions?
Oh, Allison's oh good.
Hello.
Councillor McKenzie.
Um so you don't need to name them, but um if do you have a perspective in terms of a preference in terms of the risk of fire and spreading a fire for the camping?
Like, are there places that are better for it than others?
Well, obviously, um if I look at our map, um, and thankfully, and and I say this, you know, with with all reverence to our CRD bylaw folks, thankfully Thetis Lake and Mill Hill is not our jurisdiction for bylaw enforcement.
There's a significant camping element in both of those parks.
Um, you know, obviously any fire that gets out of hand in those parks could be massively devastating.
We had the one the one fire this summer at the top of Seymour Hill as a result of a homeless camp.
Um, you know, obviously in the middle of a field versus uh out of sight in a forest is is a far better solution.
Um it's a it's a difficult issue because you know, any form of uh campfires, open burning, uh anything that produces smoke or or spark is not permitted by bylaw in the town.
So we run into a bit of a situation where we have a we have a homeless camp with a an open fire and these people are trying to stay warm or they're trying to cook dinner, and then you have to do the balancing act of, you know, if I ask them to extinguish the fire, they don't eat tonight or they're not they're not warm tonight.
So it's a it's a very difficult uh balancing act.
But I'd say any, you know, obviously out in the open is is far more preferable than hidden away somewhere in the uh the parks in the backwoods.
Any other questions?
Thank you, Chair.
I don't have a representative of the um development services here, so I'll speak to this report.
Um the building report covers the months of July, August, September, and October, and the most significant information on the report would be the multifamily permits that have been issued.
And you'll note that the July and the August numbers are identical.
I'm hoping that's coincidence.
But I'll get back to you and confirm either way, whether or not it's coincidence.
Um they are significant numbers.
Um in addition to those large numbers, the October report also includes a multifamily item uh in excess of 22 million dollars.
Those um numbers represent issuance of building permits for uh the excavation of projects that are significant.
Uh July would be a nine Erskine.
Um the other two would be um three Helmkin, the corner of Burnside and Helmkin, and um also the corner of Helmton and Holland Highway.
If you have questions about the detail, um I can certainly refer those to staff and respond to you by email.
That's the report.
Thank you.
Council Rogers, you have a question?
Yes, thank you.
Yeah, a comment.
Um, really impressed with uh the month end of October, um, our third best, maybe the best year in comparison dating back to 2015.
So it's really, really remarkable.
Um, do we expect that uh with that's October, two more months to go that it will increase further?
Well, the numbers are misleading.
The uh the amount that's described on the document is an accurate number.
However, the um the number will be matched over time with the life of the construction of the building.
And so if 10% of the building is constructed in the current year and the other 90% and following years, it means that 90% of that revenue would be deferred for future years.
And so while the the the numbers look great um it all depends on how much of that building is complete this year to realize that revenue in the current year.
Questions?
Thank you.
Um, I've well, this is the first time Arts and Culture has been on committee of the whole agenda, so not yet.
I have no report.
Thank you.
I'll pass it on to my next colleague.
I believe that is me.
So I've got no report this evening.
We're down to uh six point three finance and administration.
Uh business arriving rising from previous minutes, uh seeing none, and staff reports commencing with a vehicle fleet replacement plan update.
Yes.
Good afternoon, Mayor Tobias, members of council.
My name is Stephen Vella, and I'm the manager of accounting here at the town of V Royal.
In front of you is a staff report which speaks to future vehicle replacement, and I have a few high-level points to review.
Uh, if you have any questions, myself or members of the management team will be happy to uh address them.
Uh council received the inaugural plan in 2018.
It is a living document prepared in consultation uh with the directors of engineering and protective services and is refreshed ahead of budget discussions each year as part of the town's commitment to asset management and fiscal sustainability.
Planned vehicle replacement is preferred over reactive replacement, as this ensures the smoothing of annual costs to the taxpayer while delivering desired levels of service and preserving the safety of staff and the public.
Consists of 25 vehicles, ranging in age from newly acquired to 31 years old.
Condition assessments were conducted based on reliability and maintenance requirements with 14 vehicles or 56 percent of the fleet being in either very good or excellent condition.
In the context of environmental sustainability, staff will continue to balance the practical needs of the town with market availability of more fuel efficient and environmentally sensitive options where appropriate.
The plan incorporates the financial impact of the town's move toward a greener vehicle fleet, supporting View Royal's goal of carbon neutrality.
Annual reserve contributions to the machinery and equipment and fire department machinery and equipment reserves remain unchanged and will sustain positive reserve balances over the next 20 years.
Staff recommend that the committee receive this report for information in advance of budget workshops planned for February of 2023, allowing for further discussion uh regarding the timing and funding options of this plan.
Thank you.
Councilor Rogers.
Hi, thanks staff for the report.
Um it it is certainly interesting that um we're okay so far, but it looks like uh we could have some challenges with uh the the fire department and uh vehicle replacement there.
Uh that's just a comment.
Appendix B is the five-year um excerpt and plans over the um uh replacement plan.
For those um identified uh in in various years of replacement, are those um uh for lack of better term, uh green vehicles, the EV vehicles are you taking those into account when you do the cost estimates per uh per column.
The cost estimates were provided by uh the directors of engineering and and uh protective services so they may be able to speak uh further to that.
Okay.
So yeah, that would that would be helpful.
I don't know if we um uh we would know that right off the bat but perhaps in the next report or as a as a a follow up um we can get a sense of how much we are actually dealing with uh vehicle replacement and the electrical vehicles and so on um particularly when we consider the uh the targets we uh we are needing to set in the climate action strategy and i think that speaks to uh mr brown's uh concerns and comments thank you any other questions council brown yeah, I see you got in there the report about uh e vs and the hybrid vehicles, which is great to see uh but there's nothing in there um projecting the cost savings, because there's certainly cost savings in fuel and uh maintenance of those EVs and hybrid vehicles, but that should be taken into consideration because uh it's a situation of uh pay now or pay later, because uh over the long term, typically uh hybrid or EV vehicles uh last longer, don't require as much maintenance, and obviously don't take the uh the amount of fuel that gas vehicles do.
Absolutely.
If I may, Chair, just to also clarify um another metric that's uh especially when it comes to engineering of parks that we look at is level of service.
So um staff has been actively looking at uh uh electric vehicles, hybrid vehicle options for our work trucks, for example.
Uh what we've found so far is that most of those hybrid electric trucks are for consumer vehicles.
And what I mean by that is that it's mostly um short truck boxes with a large cab in the back.
And unfortunately, when it comes to uh what the parks needs, they need actually a longer truck box, like an actual work vehicle.
And what we've what we've realized is that there's not really a market for that right now.
So right now we're trying to balance those um those metrics because ultimately if the truck box is too small, then what is sacrificed is the level of service.
And what I mean by that is that people have to do more than one trip, maybe two or three trips, just to get the same job done with a smaller vehicle.
Just another metric that staff is is considering as well when we when we look at these vehicles.
Move your seat.
Thank you.
Council Levin.
Uh we have an advisory committee structure report from the director of corporate administration.
Correct.
Thank you, Mayor Tobias.
Uh Don Christensen here, Director of Financial Services.
I'm happy to bring you this report.
For those of you on council who may be unfamiliar with this particular report, it is something that we do monthly, and so the format will, I'm sure, become familiar to you within a short period of time.
The idea with this report is really transparency when it comes to the financial situation of the town.
One of the ways we do this is through the budget variance dashboard available on our website.
This report is it expands on that a little bit more in that the dashboard that is updated weekly and available on our website really focuses on the operational result financial results and that being operational revenues and expense, as well as updates on the various types of projects that are on the go and approved in the budget for 2022 for the current year.
This report expands that a little bit more to not only give you the whole picture being the consolidated financial situation at the to the period stated, but it also attempts to explain a little bit of the why.
Why are some numbers above or below budget and how you know we provide our provide our professional lens on how are we actually doing.
So that's really what this report is about.
And and the approach that it takes is basically we analyze the numbers and we bring to your attention those areas of the budget that maybe apparently look perhaps that they are not, you know, they are above or below target, and we try to explain why that might be and what council can expect the position to be by the end of the year.
Not in terms perhaps of exact number projections at this point in time, but certainly whether or not we expect to be at or near the target, the budget target.
So rather than go into detail if council has had a chance to look at this report, I'm just simply happy to answer any questions you might have.
I also will rely on some of the other senior directors in the meeting to be able to answer more specific questions about their areas.
Otherwise, this report is just available for the committee to receive.
Thank you.
Thank you, Director.
Questions?
Councilor Mass.
As usual, very good report.
Thank you.
Yes.
Thanks, Staff.
Page two of nine, you say that revenues are greater than expected, but they're going to reserves.
Does that mean we can't spend it on what we like?
Or is that already spoken?
Yes, indeed.
You you have hit the nail on the head.
An example of this would be where a piece of land has been sold within the year.
You know, we may or may not have expected that uh revenue to come in, but under legislative under uh provincial legislation, that money is not available to spend.
It indeed needs to be contributed to reserves.
So on the face of it, our revenues are up, but you can expect an equal and opposite uh direction uh for the money to be transferred to reserves.
Okay, thank you.
Other questions, comments?
Uh so you in the um um the last page where we're talking about park improvements and it talks about uh portage park toilets.
In actual fact, it's only one going in there and the other one going into Centennial Park.
Is that correct?
Yes, that's correct.
Thank you.
So one in Portage, one in Centennial.
Yeah, I believe the structures are up right now.
Um I don't know as a fact whether or not the actual porter potties are in just yet.
They've we've been waiting for quite a while, supply chain issues at this time.
Do we don't have an ETA?
The last time I asked Dave Pavmrov, no, not yet.
Maybe by next summer.
And I could be in my own words.
It could be already be in.
So I'll double check the councillor.
Thank you.
No other questions or comments.
Motion to receive.
Second.
Counselors Rogers and Lemon.
All in favor.
So that brings us to item C, advisory committee structure, which is a late item distribution.
And you'll see the uh the agenda is rather chunky because the staff has certainly done some work and you'll find um significant history uh over the structure in there.
Um over to you, Chief Administrative Officer.
Thank you, Mayor Tobias.
Um the H2 Advisory Committees has some history with us, and so the creation of the report is based on um walking, rewalking that path of history to understand how we get to where we are today.
Um the context for this report and the committees is attachment A, which is the mandates and procedures for the committees that currently exist.
So since 2014, there have been discussions about making larger modifications to the advisory committee structure to ensure they stay relevant and provide community benefit.
Attachment B is the 2016 report that set out the genesis of the current structure.
At that time, the Transportation Committee and the Planning Advisory Committee often overlapped in terms of the issues that they talked about.
And so the end result was the amalgamation of those two committees to create the Community Development Advisory Committee, which we currently have.
From 2016 today, the two advisory committees have been CDAC and Parks and Recreation and Environment Advisory Committee, PREAC.
Our report to Council's February 19th meeting explored role clarity communications in relation to advisory committees and changing circumstances that challenged membership numbers, attendance rates, and recruitment.
The um the recommendation in that report was actually to disband and form ad hoc committees.
So that particular report was referred to the advisory committees, and the end result was another report, which is attachment D.
Attachment D speaks to a recommendation to disband advisory and develop procedures for select committees.
The procedures state that committees may have a maximum of 12 members each, including the council liaison member, two councillors who are non-voting members.
Essentially, this means there can be 10 volunteer members from the public on each advisory committee.
The selection process historically has been one where we advertise, and um the basis of applications submitted, council appoints to the advisory committees.
And so our history in 2019, the CDAC committee was below capacity in that there were eight members of the public and two members of council, and later in that term, two additional members were appointed.
PREAC during that year was below capacity.
It had 10 members, two of whom were council liaisons.
Through part way through the term, three members resigned and one member was appointed.
In 2020, it was below capacity in terms of having 10 members, two of whom were council liaisons.
PRIAC was below capacity, it had eight members, two of whom were council liaisons.
In 2021, CDAC was at capacity with 12 members, two of whom were council liaisons.
PREAC in 2021 was below capacity with nine members, two of whom were council liaisons through part way through the term.
One new member was appointed.
In 2022, CDAC was at capacity with 12 members, and PREAC was below capacity with eight members.
The point of that review is there have been challenges getting members of the public to volunteer to participate in the committees.
In terms of the business at hand, attachment E describes um the various meetings that have taken place the motions made and the outcome in summary CDAC over the term since 2018 to 2022 there was a potential for 23 meetings 10 meetings were held 12 meetings were canceled and one is to be determined as scheduled for November 29th in terms of motions made there were 19 14 were received by council one was supported by council one was changed and then supported by council, one is referred to staff, one was referred to the Committee for Climate Action, and one was to approve extra, one was to approve an extraordinary meeting.
Pre acts history, there was a potential for 22 meetings.
11 meetings were held, 10 were canceled, one is yet to be determined.
There were 29 motions made, 11 were received by council, one was supported by council, one was changed and then supported by council, five were referred to staff, 10 were referred to the Committee for Climate Action Plan, and one was referred to the Active Transportation Network Plan.
So in terms of the business at hand, you know, when we're talking about motions that have been received, it it's a motion that resulted in no action from council.
And more than 50% in both cases have been received.
In terms of staff support, section 1242C of the committee charter is the section of the statute that requires that we provide for taking minutes both for council meetings and for council committee meetings, including the certification of those meetings.
And so a certification of the minutes is done by the corporate officer.
When somebody requires a copy of the minutes, the corporate officer is required to certify those as a true copy of the minutes.
And so in that regard, minutes become a requirement.
In terms of resources to operate the two current advisory committees with five meetings each per year, it requires roughly 110 hours of staff time, of which 40 hours five to our evening meetings for four employees are paid at time and a half.
This time is split into agenda, pre-meeting, meeting, and post meeting activities.
If we expand the number of advisory committees, we would see roughly 275 hours of staff time would come from, and there is no current capacity to take on additional required hours.
Now, in terms of discussion about creating minutes from transcribed meetings, we anticipate that creating minutes from a transcription is likely going to take as long or longer than actual attendance at meetings.
When using transcription to create minutes, the clerk will not necessarily be able to identify the speaker, pick up the nuances of the discussion, seek clarification, or focus the conversation towards a clear and helpful motion for council to consider.
The time spent during the workday for the clerk on creating post meeting minutes from a transcription will not what is not available.
Like we are working at capacity.
It does mean that taking on additional tasks means that it's going to create work for overtime, that sort of thing.
I don't want to give you the impression that staff is, you know, against expanding the number of committees.
It does represent work for staff, and we're we're happy to do that work, and we're happy to support those committees.
Um in your speech, Mayor Tobias, you you talked about our vision and you talked about it expanding it to include safety, engagement, and transparency.
And that's something that's really easy to embrace because it it is something that enhances democracy.
We are we are very supportive of that notion.
I don't I don't want you to have the impression that because we had two meetings where in both of those meetings we recommended disbanding advisory committees that were against them.
We didn't think that they were meaningful, we didn't think that they were as beneficial as they might be, given the history of the motions and the degree to which council acted on the motions versus receiving them.
And so we questioned whether or not they represented value to council.
And I think that was the criteria in in those meetings wherein we recommended a change.
I think that's the report that you requested.
If you have questions, the corporate officers, Sarah Jones and myself, will respond.
I I do have one, and I thank you for the report.
And I think it's um we're at a significant crossroads, I think now emerging from a pandemic, whereas we saw the level of activity in in uh that that's normal certainly take a hit.
And uh I'm not sure whether it's a rebound of that or a willingness to get more involved with government.
Um, but that's something that I certainly sensed and and a balance of what we've heard tonight.
There was um uh, you know, thank you for your contributions and coming up.
And what I benefited from was that at different times in the history of this council, there have been more or less committees, more or less community involvement.
And it it isn't a constant state.
But I I want to open it up and get some uh some dialogue going about the benefits for and against.
Having been a member of the committee, I felt like there was more that we could contribute to council than we were tasked to provide to council, right?
So uh we had meetings that didn't occur because we had no agenda items, and but we had things to say that weren't agenda items that we couldn't say.
So all of a sudden we we've kind of boxed things up so that uh are we inviting engagement and new ideas or something relevant uh to council that we could benefit from, or are we just using the committees uh to investigate what we have to say?
And I'll use the circumstances of complexity that we've got about us right now, such as uh homelessness, such as work on the OCP.
There are some other research I think that could benefit staff.
And um lastly, I just point out that we do we have incorporated significant technology even in running these meetings.
And is there a method that we could use to receive those minutes, still have you sign off, but delegate that to committees and secretaries?
That you know, a good example of that is our climate coalition who does a really good job of being able to take care of their business that we recognize.
So is there some compromise that we could make, knowing where we've come from with the introduction of technology, even with this in this council, to allow committees to do it?
Because if we're really talking about cost and staff time and balancing that against public engagement and getting more input in to enrich our decision making, uh, I'm not sure if that that balance is the the the only topic, but it should be one for discussion tonight.
So I'd invite your comments.
Of course, there's legislation too that we have to follow too.
And maybe it's an opportunity to take a look at the committees that we have suggested, and maybe there's an opportunity to amalgamate some of those like parks, recreation, and environment.
It's like two different things, but there's an overlap there.
And um from my experience as chairing that committee, uh I mean Ian Brown, that's the first time I've met him in person because we're doing all our meetings uh electronically right but um uh I think it's rather than you know push it all through maybe it's a time to discuss maybe amalgamating maybe we don't need five or six maybe we need two or three I don't know just my my my thoughts counselor lemon I I don't disagree with counselor brown um you know the uh the wages, the salaries to be paid to staff um is it's called operational, and that's that's what hits tax bills.
So if we're looking at 275 added, well, 20 275 hours, I've no idea what that works out to, but potentially that could you know reflect and make become you know half a percent increase or a full percent increase on the tax bill.
Um so that's that's a real consideration.
But I do I do um in just regress a little bit.
Um in most of my term on council, I've you know, my previous, I've had one previous term.
Uh, it was it was COVID times.
And so virtually all uh committee meetings took place online.
So there was, you know, this and and that's hard.
That was hard.
It was, you know, you people, you that I have been on committees, the arts commission, for example, that I'm on with CRD.
I've been on it for four years, but I've never met anyone, you know, so it's so that kind of distancing is is is just difficult.
You don't feel like you're a part of something.
So I could see how there would be challenges with involvement and feeling engaged with the two committees that we have.
But I I do um respect Councillor Brown's um suggestion that, you know, perhaps arts and culture um would be a comfortable fit with with um CDAC and and perhaps environment would be a comfortable fit, as it used to be, I believe.
I think it used to be parks, recreation, and environment with the pre-act committees.
And that's all I that's my thoughts for the moment.
Thank you.
Councillor Roger.
I completely disagree.
The um the importance of these advisory committees cannot be under underestimated.
And the um combination of arts, development, transportation into one committee that only has two hours every two months, I've witnessed, it's impossible.
They do nothing other than you know, they're they're overwhelmed.
There is a very complex transportation study that that accompanies these development proposals.
They haven't got the skill set, they haven't got the time.
The beauty of having a separated transportation advisory committee meeting was that they would you know focus on that particular aspect, leaving the other committees to focus on on development, you know, the aspects of floor space ratio designs and and uh setbacks and whatnot.
So to um if you don't appreciate the fact that this committee, you know, let's say the transportation, they're also going to be taking on a climate action responsibility.
They're going to be taking on an active transportation responsibilities, and and uh so that one committee alone could do very well meeting monthly and ensuring that we're able to not only address the business that we supply, the issues of that we want them to look into, but I want to take what uh what other municipalities have done.
Other municipalities have four, five advisory committees, and they're not quibbling about how much staff you know time it is because they know there is an investment of the community, of their abilities to understand what is going on in the neighborhoods, what's going on with their fellow residents, and they also have the ability to speak to those residents and understand what is at hand beyond just the transportation report.
So I'm really, I was uh I've been really frustrated with CDAC.
I understand, you know, this whole thing about meaning by Zoom, well, look at this.
What are we doing here?
We're in person, all of us.
And having 12 individuals on a committee, I think is ridiculous.
The um, you know, there's not enough 12 12 people in two hours.
There's not enough room for people to discuss things and get involved.
There is not, we we should be trusting our advisory committees or trusting those citizens that want to do well for our community and give them uh the ability for greater freedom, greater flexibility to be able to listen to their neighbors and be able to go out.
Because that's the thing.
How many of them actually get out there and assess the development proposal on the street or you know, go work with other municipalities and and their their advisory committees?
I don't have we're we're stifling this whole thing into a bureaucratic nonsense.
And I I appreciate staff's time and uh their investment um in being in with the committees, but just look at this as staff time.
How much are we investing by having two more counselors on this committee, on this council?
We knew that there was going to be a cost factor of that, and we accepted that.
So why don't we have the same appreciation and recognition for these advisory communities?
Let's give them a chance.
Let's let's break this up.
I don't, I think, you know, when we look at our we have got an arts policy.
We would need residents to help us on that.
We would need them to liaison with the West Shore.
I think that why would we want to put that in with the CDAC that don't care, in with the transportation that don't care?
Let's give them specific tasks so that they can get on with it and really parade, provide a astonishing, remarkable result for our community.
Let's invest in them.
They will invest in us.
Thank you.
Thank you, Councillor Rogers.
Counselor.
I'm not sending you have any other.
I think I do.
Yeah.
What I have is you know basically a question.
So, how could we structure?
I mean, what I've heard so far is the biggest concern is the additional staff time.
And I know we have the you know, before COVID, we had Volunteer View Royal, which basically met on their own and uh you know basically had one task which was to sort of work on Canada Day.
So how can we structure the committees so that staff don't have to be there for a legislative reason?
And if we could do that, then it would seem to negate most of the concerns that people have in terms of just the additional staff.
You know, you'd all of a sudden the 250 hours wouldn't be there.
There would be certain times when it'd be necessary for staff, but for the most part, it wouldn't be.
If I may, Mayor Tobias.
I I did not mean to communicate to you that our biggest concern was staff time.
That's not our biggest concern.
When you put the motion on the floor last week, you indicated that one of the purposes was to provide opportunity for more engagement of the public.
And so far, if this was a report card, it would not get a pass mark.
Not from my perspective.
You, however, are the body that get to judge.
Was that successful or not?
And so before I sit down, one of the things that comes to my mind is we are going to have some um strategic planning sessions.
And that's going to be your opportunity to influence where this ship goes.
It is your job to steer.
And when you make that decision, you can identify those objectives that need to be addressed.
And perhaps that will also generate some enthusiasm.
Council.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
So far, I'm agreeing with a lot of comments up here and uh on a variety of levels.
I have my own opinions on how this should roll out, and it's probably somewhere in the middle, to be honest with you.
I like the idea of a more thoughtful phased approach to increasing committees.
And when this came up uh during the last meeting and we decided to table it, I think it was uh the right thing to do.
I think it was a responsible thing to do.
I I have learned so much about uh I didn't realize staff were paid time and a half for meetings.
Not that that is the deciding factor for uh voting for or against an additional uh committees and public engagement, but it is a consideration.
Knowing their limits and capacity is a consideration.
Knowing the level of interest in the community over the past few decades is important to know.
That being said, Councilor Rogers' passion for public engagement on this topic is refreshing.
Uh, Merit Tobias has mentioned that there is an increased level of public engagement post-COVID.
And I do agree.
I think the last election, uh judging by the results, there was uh uh a whiff of change in the air in the CRD.
That is fair to say, which means there is a level of engagement.
Uh, I am proposing a more balanced phased approach to increasing committees uh with staff support.
I would like to see a phased uh phase model where we would increase committees as needed.
If we do reach the number five, so be it.
Um, but right now I'm not prepared to support five brand new committees.
I'm also hearing from members of council that they would like a complete uh re-evaluation of the OCP.
That also requires public engagement, uh, which is can be double duty, but you would want as many people having input in that as possible.
So I'm worried about capacity, um, but I'm I'm also worried that it's an opportunity where I don't want to miss this train as well.
Because if if there are people that want to get on, let's do this.
Um, but but I just want a thoughtful, uh balanced approach to it.
Uh and I want staff to feel comfortable as well.
Okay, counselor.
Counselor.
Yeah, um, so I just I think my biggest concern was not the cost of it.
Um, I was thinking having different committees might result in silos and not seeing the bigger strategic picture across the different committees.
Um, so that's just one thing.
Um, I do like uh counselor uh Councillor Kolovich's um suggestion there.
Um I purposely went last because I wanted to hear from people who have experienced the the current structure um as well as the staff report, which I think um I'm a very much a data driven person.
So um the numbers in there that really inform my perspective on it.
Um as well as I would also like to hear a little bit more from the chair of the the current committees.
I don't know if we have any of them here tonight, but um oh no.
Yes.
Yeah, uh I was appointed in 2020, and then I was subsequently elected to be the vice chair of the parks, Recreation, and environment committee.
And then when the chair resigned, uh, I automatically took over as chair, and uh since that time, I've I've never chaired a meeting.
So we had no agenda items and the meetings were were canceled.
So I believe there's three meetings in total in about a year and a half, and that's it.
And uh very short agendas and very short meetings.
And uh Lindsay Chase was her staff person that attended electronically.
Right.
Okay, thank you.
Um, sorry, so so I do have a question um to probably two staff.
Um, at what point do we have to make this decision?
Is it something we have to make at this point in time, or is it something that we can um for the new council members experience?
What it's like with the current structure, and then change it, or is there it's really up to council to choose when that decision should be made.
There are no requirements.
Currently there are two committees.
Right.
Okay.
And just uh for clarification, those committees uh have another uh month and a bit to go, right?
So I I don't think we need to this is not immediately urgent that we need to come up across the the the right pattern.
The other point I wanted to make and and whatever that structure looks like, and I'm certainly willing to grow it uh in in where it makes sense, is that we have a few counselors that um may not run the next time around, and what better way to uh allow opportunities for our citizens to integrate with government?
And certainly I benefited from both sitting on the committee and chairing uh the committee um and and gave me some small insight into the role of council.
Uh but it is we also have to look at those opportunities where the public can become familiar and comfortable with uh what it's like to be involved with municipal politics.
So I think it it has a number of good effects.
Again, I'm not advocating for uh any number of of committees, it's getting it right and being able to adjust it, I think as we go is the right thing.
Uh I I think there is significant work to do.
So in my line of work, um we use public engagement to identify issues.
We categorize those issues and refine them, and then we uh work on mitigations for those issues and track them over time.
And I think the one thing that I've learned about public engagement is you don't get it right because it's always changing.
People's perceptions about how they would like to be engaged, um, change.
And I don't think anything larger for impact could have come along like a pandemic.
It made people rethink everything.
Um, and now coming out the other side of it, uh, I I think uh we're hearing what people have experienced and and their level of involvement.
What I tried to do in my my simple binary brain was we've also added two counselors on.
I wanted their experience as well to be meaningful.
For the assignment of positions, I wanted those to be aligned for experience sake while you know our our new counselors and myself get integrated into what it looks like to be part of a council.
So honoring what has been while still providing opportunity to to things that I think are important to residents, particularly around the environment and and protective services.
Of course, those are two pillars to to work out from.
So I think we don't have to make a decision one way or another tonight.
The other thing I would like to take away from this is I would like to strengthen our mandate for each one of those things.
And perhaps we would strike the mandates for committees, however, they might not be on the top of our priority list.
And I think there's a balance to make there about what's important next.
I think there was some uh really good discussion about the OCP.
We're also aware and we're informed at the last meeting that we may be legislatively required to have an accessibility committee.
It's not a it's not an issue of whether we would like to have one or not.
That will come down through legislation that's being tabled right now with the profits, right?
So there are going to be things that we're gonna have to flex.
And I also think the type of committees could also be uh uh explored.
Do we need a standing committee on this one?
Do we need something more attuned to a task force to address OCP matters and engagement?
And and I think what we could do with the right structure uh of committees is strengthen the staff uh uh ability to deliver and make them successful in doing it, particularly when it comes around OCP engagement.
I mean, those committees are the best ones to filter out network and and create the um the the input needed uh to get honest uh and uh feedback that we need to to build a community plan.
So I'm okay if we don't make a decision tonight at all.
Counselor Mass.
Yes thank you.
So one of the things whether we have two committees or five committees I what I really think one of the things that the committee's advisory committees lost over time was that at one time the chairs used to go out and basically choose um they they used to pick issues that they felt that would be worthwhile for the committee to s to talk about and so one of the problems I've seen now in in the committees we have uh the only ones who bring issues to to the advisory committees are council and a lot of times there just isn't a lot there and so they don't end up having meetings it takes away the whole ability of of the members to feel engaged and and be and be involved and sort of bring things issues that are an issue with their part of the community to that to that group to talk about and uh potentially come up with a recommendation to council in terms of how how things how to make things better so I I think that's an important aspect to add to the to the advisory committees.
The other question I have just for staff and and I and and Kim, you didn't quite answer that because you just focused in on um the comment that you know the biggest issue and you said that it wasn't.
But is there a structure?
I don't have to answer it now next time.
How could we structure a committee and does it have if if it's not an advisory committee, you know, is it something that's like advisor or volunteer view royal where we didn't actually have a lot of staff time involved and we still got things done in Volunteer View Royal.
So is there a you know I don't know if there's a legislative mandate to have staff there versus something else that we could have where the the committees would meet and then bring recommendations to council or even if they don't formally bring them to council the liaison for that committee then brings brings it themselves as a a notice of motion or something to council even though it came from an advisor well whatever the advisory committee would be called again just for looking at ways to uh allow for those sorts of discussions for the public to be involved in those committees without actually having to potentially meet uh legislative structure we'll certainly give that some thought I look forward to um having a discussion about committees generally speaking I think counselor McKenzie was um so I was just gonna say I think the timing it might make sense to do um make a the decision after or following the strategic planning um session that we're going to be having I forget what um but because then we can see really what's coming up on the horizon what are the big projects what are the big areas and then to see if there's enough work or you know for for these um uh committees because I I do think I I know personally I hate attending a meeting 10 minutes and then you go home you know like that's not meaningful so I think that would be a good maybe an option.
Thank you Councillor Brown the correct me if I don't get if I don't get the if I get the name of the committee wrong a climate action committee it's a it's a group that's not a formal committee of us for us but I've met with them informally and I know they're looking at making a presentation to council so I appreciate what what Ron's saying council maths that's saying is they have a meeting and they discuss something and they bring it to council just like the people did today I think that's a great idea and I think we don't have to be it doesn't have to be a formalized um structured committee I don't know how many people are on that I think there was four I believe uh at the informal meeting I have with them electronically thank you counselor counselor rudd uh yes I just want to um uh point out that in in the um uh policies of advisory committees is that committees um may choose to convene on off meeting months, independent of town resources or support.
So there is that possibility.
You know, somehow I had the impression that they were not allowed to do that.
And you know, it's refreshing and uh to be able to see that, yeah, they can come together, they can discuss the ideas, they could even discuss the ideas jointly with the, you know, between two committees, right?
So they're they're not silos.
They uh I'm sure they want to cross pollinate even with themselves and and with other municipalities, see what everyone else is doing on arts and culture and so forth.
So I think we already have given them permission.
The problem is that when we have um the meetings uh agendas, they're not posted.
Nobody in the public, you know, this isn't an in-camera meeting, but we do not post their agendas, we don't post their their meetings and uh in in an easily accessible way, which I think is also a process that we need to change.
And we've I think it's the culture of our of the previous council was that we're only the ones that are gonna give them the information and the and what to research.
And then that has definitely got to change.
Let's give them some autonomy, let's live that.
And that's what we say to share ideas, and indeed, it goes on to talk about um advisory committee initiatives, just as long as they don't use staff resources, there's a green light.
So I think what we're talking about is piling everything onto two little committees that haven't got enough time to do it all.
Let's fix that.
Council Lemon.
I I think in um planning and developing how to move forward it would Mr.
Wilcher um he puts mentioned that he was on committees over three terms and he's sitting here today so I'm you know I'm thinking maybe he would like to be involved again.
So um so you know tapping into the experience of those who were in you know the the successful in happy years of commit of committees I I think would you know as we as we develop a plan for how to do this would be useful.
I can move staff's recommendation that the advisory committee's structure be received.
Okay.
I know it's a little out of order, but it'll get we might as well check that off.
Just a point motion on favor.
So I must be telling the yes we can still have discussion.
Speaking to the have you guys thank you.
Thank you.
So um I'm a little reluctant to just to simply receive it and not go anywhere.
What's our next steps?
I am uh supporting staff's recommendation for it to be received.
It's my understanding from the healthy discussion here today that this probably will be moved forward uh in a timely manner and that the uh staff has been taking notes on our uh discussion to date.
Is that fair?
I guess and speaking to that, I would hope also that the CAO and the and the mayor would uh work together in coordinating a time and date where it's maybe a special meeting could be uh uh uh arranged for a session.
Thank you.
Thank you, Council Rogers.
We can turn you to that.
Action list update or yeah, uh third quarter report dated November third, twenty twenty-two from the executive assistant.
Thank you, Mayor Tobias.
The um the report is produced quarterly, and what it is is a um a summary of action items, uh, council resolutions that are yet outstanding or are complete.
And so the report refers to the meeting of origin, the date of that meeting, a reference number in terms of the resolution that was passed, a description of the topic, the action item.
It describes who's the person responsible, what department that person works in, and the comments column indicates the current status of that particular item.
It's not intended that these items individually be debated.
If you have questions about individual items, you can certainly ask that.
The preference would be that you do that by email.
The tool is used to communicate with council that the business that council has conducted has been acted up acted upon, it's been closed.
Uh some items might be closed in a fashion that you want to talk about, but generally speaking, um when an item is closed, it's successfully concluded based on the action described by council.
And so the uh intention is that a motion be put forward to receive the report.
So in favor, yeah.
So um uh Kim on on um the very first one with respect to the pedestrian crossing Helmicken Roadwalk this way.
If we want to be able to modify um uh the what should you say, the motion or the mandate of that to a broader perspective of a traffic analysis and and of that intersection uh including Burnside Helmican, how would we do that?
It's an interesting item and and um perhaps it's more appropriate for Ivan to respond to that question.
He's uh actively working on that project.
Thank you.
Thank you, Chair.
Ivan, the young director of engineering here.
Yeah, just with respect to this line item, um, I'm expected to uh provide a report to council in the upcoming weeks with respect to this uh a lot of moving pieces.
Uh we've had that development on three Helmkin that has done a traffic impact assessment in and around this area.
Um we've had uh the district of Sanich in their financial plan indicated that they'll be doing a review of the Wilkinson five-way intersection uh next year.
So that in itself would have a trickle-down effect to uh the downstream system, which is which is uh Helmcken Wark/Waukis.
Um and in addition to that, we have our active transportation network plan.
So we have all these metrics and uh ultimately uh what we would like to do is to um engage council to determine uh which way to go.
But uh the idea is to give you enough information for you to make that.
Follow up question, your worship.
So the um the problem is that you know we've we talked about those, but we um haven't anticipated the number of buses that are coming from the handy dart.
We haven't anticipated the amount of uh traffic that's gonna come off of First and Lane.
And um and and I'm hoping that somehow we would be able to also involve Sanich and and because so much traffic is going to and from their uh municipality.
And believe me, there's the if it's the not the first or the second issue that's been expressed in this uh election about the frustration of that intersection and traffic flow.
So I'm hoping that with what you've got, we're gonna be able to expand that and really work on a solution.
Uh yeah, yeah, uh Chair.
Thank you, Chair.
We'll certainly look at that and then as part of our report to council in the upcoming weeks, we'll uh we'll bring something forward for you to discuss.
I think it's important though to separate out the tasks that we give to staff while still considering follow-on action, counselor.
I think because you now create something that they can't deliver on.
So I think piece by piece if we are asking them to do a specific task, allow them to progress and carry on with that one so they feel a sense of accomplishment delivering something and then maybe learning some more in that process so they could uh you know build on that and and look at some other opportunities and recommendations that we might benefit from.
So the motion is on the floor to receive.
We need to take a vote.
All in favor.
Motion carries.
I think it's received.
So have you got a CAO update as well?
Yes.
Yes.
Thank you, Mayor Tobias.
The purpose of this report is to provide information to council regarding material events that take place at town hall.
It's evolved somewhat in that uh we've included from time to time perhaps more human interest items rather than material items.
Um, if I were to highlight the material things, I would highlight for you the issue of cybersecurity awareness.
Um, it is an issue, it is something that our insurers have reminded us of that we need to be wary and we need to have a program to address cyber security risks.
Um secondly, a reminder that the draft building bylaw will be coming to council in the new year.
Um that bylaw does address the STEP code three objective along with uh a number of other objectives.
It is going to be based on the municipal Insurance association court bar law.
Uh, another significant item would be the Helmkin Centennial Park Master Plan.
We're going through an RFP process, and hopefully, we'll be hiring a uh consulting group to assist with the development of a master plan for the park.
The fire department is just closed its recruitment process.
It um has received 12 applications.
The department will be taking on six new recruits for January 2023, bringing the active force to 32.
And so they they do have a turnover issue.
I always have had a turnover issue.
It seems that um while we do a good job training the volunteers, the uh the job that we do sets them up for jobs in other communities on a full-time basis.
Um, I think the fire chief already talked about the issue of uh a safe workplace and the homeless population that from time to time is within our parks and public spaces, and we are to the point where the RC and B have to assist us to make sure that um we take care of the safety of our employees.
I think those are the highlights that I would identify for you.
So thank you.
The uh recommendation is for a motion to receive the report.
Well, thank you.
Second all in favor?
Section may have thank you.
Um, on the engineering with respect to the um transportation um adv um active transportation plan.
Um very pleased to hear that and see that we had the cycling tours this weekend.
Yep.
I understand it was well attended with uh lots of good put input.
I understand that uh individuals that wanted to ride down um to see Highland Highway Admirals were told that it was too dangerous, that that was not a good idea.
It's probably a good foreshadowing as if we're going to be cycling and tell the cyclist that it's too dangerous to go there on a tour, we might want to fix that.
So um I haven't taken note of your comments.
And the second point is I'm really pleased to see that we have a the uh the interests of cycling group involved.
Um, are we gonna be doing something similar to um do tours for pedestrians or workshop for pedestrians or likewise for transit users and not rely on on BC Transit for that input?
We'll have to forward that comment to BC Transit.
No, I'm no, I don't want.
I think what I'm saying is I don't want to have information from BC Transit, right?
They're only talking about schedules and issues like that.
We're talking about bus shelters and things that we have to worry about too in order for our transit users to get there, our residents to get their safety to and from the bus stops.
Okay.
Thank you.
So I'm trying to get a crunchy recommendation that you're trying to offer.
Uh I'm hoping that we also provide the same thing we did with recycling as we and we do that for pedestrians and transit users as well.
So Chair, if I can clarify, is the request for a bike shop for pedestrians and BC transit users?
Well, not a bike shop, but a workshop.
Yeah, yeah.
Yeah.
A workshop for pedestrians.
Similarly for transit users.
As an example of something similar or same flavor as a bike shop, but meant and catered towards species transit and pedestrians.
Yes, please.
Yeah.
So um yeah, we sent a an update to council for the uh active transportation network plan.
Uh we brought forward the uh community engagement plan, and that was done several months ago.
Um obviously, Mary Tobias, you uh probably weren't part of that discussion at that time, but it was uh to give you a little bit of background um as part of our engagement activity.
We wanted council to know what kind of engagement activities we'll be doing.
Um there are five phases, and of those five, there were three engagement events.
Um during that update, uh we're almost doing our phase one or a round one of engagement, which is a um an ideas fair, which was our two events that took place along the Galvan Goose uh corridor as well as the ENN trail.
It was like tent set up so that cyclists, pedestrians, all road users can go there and and and comment.
Um in addition, there was a survey that that followed, and we actually got quite good comments on that.
Uh following that, we had uh this bike shop now.
Now, specifically with respect to this bike shop, it was actually an extra in our RFP or request for proposals for the consultants to provide services.
Um, it was determined that we had enough budget to include this special engagement item in there, and that's why we decided to put it in there.
Uh following that, uh, with respect to, you know, to answer your question, uh, Council Rogers, with respect to a similar event for pedestrians or BC Transit, uh, the short answer is no.
However, there are opportunities for them to be engaged, and that's with the future survey and then uh a public open house for the draft.
Um and that's actually I forgot what I was gonna say next, but uh yeah, that's about it from there.
Uh that said, there is always an opportunity for everyone to uh be engaged and contact town at uh engineering at at VWorld.ca Thank you, Kim.
Thank you, Steph.
We could see your correspondence.
Second.
All of you.
Uh closed meeting resolution.
There's no closed meeting resolutions.
So we could conclude the afternoon proportion, even though it's dark out of the meeting is now over, and we can reconvene at 7 p.m.
Hi folks, welcome back.
If you're on the wrong channel, um then you're at the town of View Royals Committee of the Whole for Tuesday, November 8th, 2022.
We're at the time in the agenda where public participation period will come up quite rapidly.
If I could remind you, please to keep your comments within five minutes.
If you come up to the podium, you will need it, you'll notice a yellow flashing light, which means you're getting closer to the five-minute point, at which point you'll see a red flashing light.
So I don't want to be a bad guy and call you out for being over five minutes.
So I'll just let you police yourselves there.
And if I see a red flashing light, then we both know that I'm not being rude, and we're just need to allow enough time so everybody has the opportunity to speak, because otherwise we'd be here until tomorrow morning.
Um, and uh we really want to hear from you and get the benefit of your input, uh, but just keep it concise and to the point on an agenda item, if you please.
So uh we can reconvene.
Uh petitions and delegations.
No petitions and delegations.
So that marks the beginning of the public participation period.
Um so at this time, the folks uh listening to the webcast at home, uh, you'll be able to uh note that you've got posted a um a conference ID as well as a uh a login uh for that uh ID.
And so you'll need to uh cue up if you want to have something to say.
Um then uh if you want to provide comments, you can also do so by telephone.
You can call 778-402 9227, and when prompted, enter conference ID 766 799 302 Pound.
At the appropriate time in the agenda, I will then announce the last four digits of your phone number.
Ask you to mute the live webcast so we don't hear it in the background and we won't get feedback from it, and we'll be able to hear you.
And ask you to use um ask you not to use the speaker phone uh to ensure the best sound quality we can and then we'll ask you to unmute yourself by pressing star six do we have anybody waiting in the queue Mayor Tobias, we have no callers at this time.
Thank you.
But we do have some folks uh from um the assembly in front of us, sir.
Please.
And uh before you speak, just activate the microphone by pushing it, and you'll see it turn red like mine.
And will this five minutes be counting down for me here?
Great.
Just like that.
I can guarantee it will be.
I'm uh Gary Mathies.
So if you could start by just introducing yourself and uh and where you live, sir.
I live at 333A uh Stewart Avenue, and I'd like to address point number nine point three point three on the agenda.
So I've submitted my um concerns earlier today, like everyone else uh did, but then I got thinking that perhaps I would like to address uh right into the development and engagement report that's submitted by staff.
Not every line, not every page.
So under the heading of uh proposal, it refers to 372 square meters of maximum floor space.
That's the rules now, and that's a floor ratio of 0.42 to 1.
The proponent is asking for 550 square meters of floor space, which gives a floor space ratio of 0.18 to 1.
On page 23 of bylaw 900, under point 3.4.4, it says that the most restrictive regulation governs all others.
So the most restrictive regulation here is the floor space, 372 square meters.
So the floor space ratio looks nice and favorable, but that isn't what matters.
Under development concept, as we carry along in the submission, it says, and I quote, the location was chosen to avoid archaeological sites on the property, end quote.
I'd like everyone to understand this entire lot is an archaeological site.
Every square foot on my land was an archaeological site.
So you're not avoiding anything by being forward in the property or behind back in the property.
And then on the next page, figure three, so the site plan.
This isn't a huge thing, but it doesn't notate a 358 square foot outbuilding being constructed between the house and the boathouse.
I don't think anybody was playing games by not putting that in.
It's just not there, and everyone should understand that that's going on right now.
Under proposed zone, it says the proposal is to create a new comprehensive development zone to increase maximum floor space to 550 meters square.
We have 28 comprehensive development zones in View Royal so far, and every one of them has been multi-units.
Most, if not all, of these comprehensive developments were expected to pay amenity funds.
The staff time and effort to create each one should be, in my opinion, way more than the cost of dealing with a variance permit and who should pay for all of this extra technical time.
Haven't had any so far.
Lastly, if this property is rezoned from maximum of 372 to 550, it will instantly increase the value of the property.
Um would this encourage others to ask for similar rezoning requests to achieve similar monetary increases for each of those property.
So therefore can't comment on any individual tree.
Under conclusion, it reads Away from several archaeological sites on the property.
I've already said that's uh not so, and I feel like that's adding fluff to uh to divert us.
I had another um concerned citizen uh send me some stuff saying similar things, comprehensive developments are 28.
Um will this open the Pandora's box?
So that wasn't just my own thought.
Thank you.
Thank you, sir.
Council Lemon.
Okay.
Okay.
Mr.
Matthews, you live next door.
Um, and the applicant has presented in my current gardens.
So thank you.
I'll start over.
Mr.
Matthews, you live next door.
The applicant has presented a petition with names of people of many people in the neighborhood who support this um proposal, proposed applic this application.
I didn't see your name or your address.
No.
Um Mr.
Richards has not uh approached myself, the very next door neighbor, um, and then two neighbors two down and three down um at all so far.
Okay, thank you.
Councillor Rogers.
So are you in favor or opposed to the proposal?
I'm opposed.
Yeah.
Thank you.
Councilor Meths.
I didn't get an opportunity to see your letter yet because it's not here.
But what's the impact on your property for having this increased building size?
Between the two properties, both owners have put in a huge amount of money on hedges and uh fruit trees, not fruit trees, ornamental trees and stuff like that.
If this proposal goes through with a two-meter, the normal two-meter variance from the property line, it will wipe out um a number of hedges and trees between the two of us and then you'd be starting over.
In addition, there's a huge maple tree there that this footprint goes right over it.
And in my written submission I I give some statistics about how far the maple tree is onto the property and that can be compared to what normal would be normally would be two meters.
To answer your question it would wipe out a huge part of the hedge between where our houses sit.
Thank you, Ms.
Council Moss.
And I just had one question, if I can, sir.
If there was a mitigation for your concern on that uh setback zone between your two properties that could be maintained, would you be challenged by the application?
I uh would mean would I disagree with the application?
If the two meters, and I think this is what you're saying, if the two meters was four, I would be way more amenable to this proposal.
Notwithstanding, the secondary step behind that is the building is four thousand one hundred square feet, addition to the existing home being kind of stuffed between our two houses, and forty one hundred square feet is bigger than all the homes in the area.
This addition would be bigger than all the homes in the area.
And um that so if if to carry on with your mitigation uh question, my secondary thing would be please reduce the footprint somewhat.
It's not for me to say what he should do.
And even in my submission, I say Mr.
Richards should have the right to add on to his house.
Just not in such an intrusive manner.
Thank you.
Thank you for your contribution.
Should I turn this speaker off?
Leave it on.
Please, if you could.
Thank you.
We do have some on the phone.
I'm getting the um sign from Sarah.
So the next caller.
And do we have a Mayor Tobias?
We have a caller, last four digits, 7107.
Caller with uh seven one zero seven please unmute and uh state your name and uh and your street address and please contain your comments to within five minutes hi it's Doug Wilson and I live at two nine one Uroyal Avenue.
I just wanted to um touch on this um rezoning application um from the perspective that this is not something that's envisioned in the community official community plan um it's a it's a proposal to to create a comprehensive development zone for a single property to make a which in effect by bylaw makes a brand new zoning that that's a complete one off and that's usually reserved for projects that are intended to have a public benefit.
Things like uh um the the per the project that's going on at Helmkin and uh Island View Highway right now that kind of thing have had had um comprehensive development zoning so that they can be one off things in the official community plan that's not envisioned it's not envisioned for any of the residential properties as a method to um change the property when the the zoning that everybody else must abide by and the quite reasonable variance uh avenues um aren't enough uh for the owner to to realize what they would like to do it's it it seems an odd way to go about it.
Back in uh twenty fourteen the I think it was the Ministry of Municipal Something and housing talked about the role of official community plans and zoning bylaws.
And they noted that councils and regional boards can expect careful scrutiny from the public when considering proposed rezonings.
The public is looking for confidence that the community plan that they were consulted on is being followed, both in law and in spirit.
Understandably, public confidence in the council or the regional board and the OCP would be eroded if they believed that the plan would be amended whenever an opportunity arose to increase local government revenue.
While state-specific OCP amendments to accommodate unanticipated developments are legally permissible, it's recommended that local governments anticipate land use changes with periodic comprehensive reviews of the plan rather than undertake frequent OCP amendments or frequent zoning amendments.
Um at where this would lead.
option to simply rezone an R1 lot into something else that is passed by bylaw.
It's not even being asked to rezone it into another existing zoning.
It's an it's a unique one off zoning that's being asked for.
If we can do that, aren't we going to have a land rush in in View Royal where every single owner simply asks for any kind of rezoning they want and can expect it and and then elevates the value of their property.
You wouldn't even have to build it you just get it rezoned and sell it on and on.
And I think that this is this is a um a difficult way forward um to to expand comprehensive development areas to what looks like simply circumventing existing zoning and variants.
Anyways, my view and uh thanks for your time.
Thank you, Mr.
Wilson.
Staff, any other callers waiting online?
Tobias, we have no other callers at this time.
And uh last chance for anybody here for public comment.
Sir my name is excuse me, Tony Della Viola.
I'm at 333 Stewart.
So two small points, and one's a statement, and I guess both statements.
First, uh I believe this change sets a precedence that I don't think we we want to accept.
And so I'm against uh the change.
Uh second, I find this this process uh a little bit painful in the sense that Pitts neighbor against neighbor.
Ideally, View Royal sets bylaws, they would enforce them and not have the neighbors come together to challenge and then cause animosity within the neighborhood.
This neighborhood has been terrific, and as of late, when someone asks for a change, it appears from the neighbors.
It gets approved by the city, unless the town or the members argue against it, which I find distasteful.
That's all.
Thank you, sir.
Seeing no other questions.
Yes, sir.
Not this time.
Not at this time.
This is uh what this would be um uh public participation period.
It could be on a number of topics.
So I think we've got some time set out in the agenda for yours.
So I think that brings to a close uh public participation period, and now pushing to business items, and I'll pass the uh chair over to counselor quelt.
Thank you.
Well, I would like to call the uh meeting of parks and recreation to order.
Thank you, Councilor Rogers, for uh chairing parks and recreation for so many years.
Big shoes to fill for sure.
Luckily, we're trading and you're taking public works and transportation, so I'll have my eye on you as well.
But uh Counselor Rogers has been probably one of the biggest supporters of parks and recreation for for decades.
And um, I've I've watched you, I've seen how you've advocated for this.
So you know, I will do my best.
Uh I also happen to serve as the chair of the West Shore Parks and Recreation Society with a budget of almost 17 million dollars.
It's a big investment that all of you uh view royal residents to contribute to uh and provides a lot of recreation opportunities for our residents uh along with our many parks.
So uh proud to do that.
Uh tonight we have a uh business arising from the previous minutes item, which is uh Polly Place Road and Capital Project.
And this was actually brought to uh this meeting by Councillor Rogers, so I'll let him speak to that thank you very much um yes i i'm a very big promoter of um and supporter of uh parks and recreation and and the creation of of parks oh just one other thing is um you wish up i wonder about um participation if if um i don't know if anyone because we do have the uh the residents here um with impacting polyplace and and hadn't spoken to the matter i'm i'm just wondering if yeah, let's let's start off with you giving a comprehensive overview of uh what the issue is and maybe some history as concise as you can.
Right.
And then if council is supportive, uh getting more fulsome uh report from the representation from the the community.
Right.
Okay, indeed.
So um yeah, this this is a um uh capital uh improvement um uh project that was approved in the 2022 budget, um, you know, $40,000 uh to develop uh road ends, and we have a list of about five or six road ends um uh that are on the plan, and this is actually out of the parks master plan.
Um what um uh in an up until very recently, I was um um forgetting the fact that um this road end polyplace had actually been uh advanced before in 2015.
Um at the time the staff had uh surveyed the the residents um on Kingham um and with uh Crane Place and sorry with uh with about this, and 84 percent of the residents said no, they don't want it.
Now I forgot about that, and uh Councillor Mattson and I are the only two members of council that would have any recollection of this, and and unfortunately um uh this wasn't part of the discussion when we were uh thinking of um uh developing a road end, and this was uh on the list.
Frankly, had I known, and I think if uh members of council had known that um the residents had been surveyed in the past and they had uh rejected in in great numbers, we would have chosen another option.
But as it stands, um uh here we are.
I think the other big difference is that um uh between 2015 and now um we developed Crane Place, 250 meters away.
So a road end for that community was built.
And it suffices the needs as far as I'm concerned, as far as I understand, and I hope council would agree.
Uh we don't need another road end, and particularly when when I'm I've provided uh an image of uh Polly Place, um, and it's not a road end like Shoreline, like Heddle or Toby Crescent, or Beaumont, it's it's uh or Stewart.
So this is two driveways and to uh on a slope and it's going down to um a very secluded uh forested area where I would suggest that septe uh would be a very grave challenge um for uh visibility and and uh whatever um it's not uh accessible to the water because of the mud um and just recently this fiscal year we uh established a paddler's beach just a short distance away and in Portage Linear Park now that is a quality deliverable and I I fully support that.
So because um of those points, uh, we've invested what, 8,000 so far, the 40.
And I would um strongly urge members of council to um stop, pull it back, and let's uh, you know, we we have uh a whole bunch of other things to spend money on.
We could perhaps choose another road end, but you know, quite frankly, I I feel there's this uh road safety issue on St.
Giles that I'd much rather be spending our money on safety as opposed to uh this road access.
So um given that VR residence has have five water access points within 250 meters, and the nature of the beast uh and the beast uh and the beach is best left for a secluded park uh for uh the bird sanctuary.
So I I would urge members to um, in fact, uh I guess it may be timely um uh chair, if I make a motion, um, I would move that we would um stop um spending any further uh capital funds on Polly Place and move it to um back into um for consideration of the 2023 second that motion uh one moment okay uh motion from Councilor Rogers on the floor, seconded by uh Councilor Brownstaff.
Were you able to record that fast enough?
Yes, okay, excellent.
Yep.
Uh and uh for for discussion first, uh, I will let Councillor Rogers speak to it again since his motion, uh, Councilor Levman, one moment.
Anything to add?
If I may, um, I wonder if the um the property owner uh could address the council.
He'd um he should have been doing it through the public participation, but I think it's valid to hear from him.
Certainly, I think as chair it's fair uh procedurally to let that happen.
Uh I I would like to hear from members of council uh first.
They have had their hands up.
Counselor Brown, did you want to comment?
Counselor Levins.
You are you declining your comment?
You were seconded the motion.
So second motion.
Okay, okay.
Councilor Lennon.
Thank you.
Um just a question to my colleagues at the end of the table who were on council seven years ago.
What was what was the thinking behind this particular site at the time that that it seemed to make it a good idea?
What what what is it about this?
I I suppose um if I recall, um, we were going to go in some order, and I guess we'd selected uh polyplace before Crane Place to do.
So when the residents told us, and I'm I may be wrong and staff can help me on on the the details, but I think once we received the uh the petition and the survey results back, uh we dropped poly and moved to develop Crane Place.
Okay.
Um and and just further to that, was was this a road end um beach access concept at the time?
Despite this not being a road end?
Yeah, it's it's an interesting point because in some respects polyplace doesn't really meet the uh the typical standards of a road end, like Price Road.
Price Road there's a road end um this is this is not you dry pie it didn't and price road has a sign poly place does not have a road sign so it's uh I think we we struggle to uh really identify the satisfactory conclusions that it's a road counselor mattson I I'll stop it please correct me if I'm wrong but I understand whenever we do a a subdivision and uh if there's not a road access within 200 meters or or whatever um then the subdivision they have to give a 60 foot strip of water or strip 60 foot strip of land to the to the water.
So I think this is probably one of those.
Is that correct?
Um chair.
Uh that legislation has been in place for a long time.
This subdivision happened a long time ago, so we don't have uh clear, I mean we can't verify that for sure, but uh, but that's that's likely one of the reasons for that to exist.
So there was a piece, so so that's why it would have been given.
Uh and the fact that the adjacent property owners have sort of built on that.
It's not the town's responsibility.
I mean, that's a mistake that was made somewhere along down the line that these individuals uh would have inherited when they purchased the property.
Councilor Brown.
So just as a way of background on that.
Yeah, I took a drive down there uh yesterday afternoon, and it just seemed very strange to have that put that road end in that particular spot.
And uh Councilor Rogers mentioned SEPTA, that's crime prevention through environmental design.
And to me, it would be an attractor, uh, you know, people gathering there uh and dark.
Um so to me, it would be it makes total sense to to stop that.
Counselor McKenzie.
Hi, um so my concern is around well, one of the reasons for doing these parts is also to identify where Vero Royal Land is and where private property ends.
And that's my one of my concerns with this, is that it seems that the owners have built on it.
So I don't know if this is a question to staff, but what would happen in that case if we were to proceed with uh a park there?
What would happen to the the property?
Private gift.
Uh yeah, certainly I can comment on that.
Thank you.
Um so the idea with this road end, I think as everyone has mentioned, it's a unique situation.
Uh grandfather from a long time ago, and there are a couple of driveways that go through there.
So it's kind of stuck between a rock and a hard place as to how to meaningfully provide uh road access there.
We've engaged with and and I and uh I really appreciate the comments that were provided by the residents and neighbors, especially um Chad, Erica and Carol.
Uh what would also be happened there is is is fairly limited, I would say, limited in scope.
It was greatly appreciated.
And that was through engagement with uh the homeowners directly to the polyplace, um, the polyplace road end.
But it would be fairly limited in the sense that uh, like for example, uh Crane Place has a sign that says it's a it's a road end, um, shoreline access, access.
The idea here was to keep it kind of more of a hidden gem, uh, a bench basically just for a view.
SEPTED was considered in the design to make sure that privacy, well, not only is privacy um uh preserved, but also that um is exposed enough so that the loitering in that is is mitigated.
So these are like the rock and a hard place stuff that we've been we've been looking at.
Um but ultimately uh long story short, it was the end product would be something fairly limited in scope.
Thank you.
Can I ask another one?
Um I guess uh if we were to decide today that we don't want to uh proceed at this time, that doesn't preclude us in the future from revisiting it, does it?
No, it does not.
No.
Okay, thank you.
Meredith Bias.
So just so I get this right because I'm slow.
In 2015, this came up as a thing that we wanted potentially to do.
Um, there was a petition, 84% of the of the um owners of property uh in that area were canvassed and came back with uh opposition for it.
We've got another water access 250 meters away in Crane Place, and our plan is to build an access to a bench for $40,000 that's bordering land that may or may not be environmentally sensitive.
Am I getting that right?
Is there anything wrong?
Just a point of clarification.
The it would the town surveyed the residents to ask if there was support.
That was the town's initiated survey back in 2015.
84% said no.
They did not want it.
I just want a clarification if it's $40,000 per road end.
Uh staff, can you advise on that?
I'm looking at project summary C-1114.
Thank you, Chair.
That is generally the case.
Uh fiscal year one of $40,000 would be less because some of that, some of those dollar items were used for design guidelines for all of the all of the um the road ends.
So slightly less for year one.
Uh thank you everybody.
Uh and uh to counselor McKenzie's point, and I mean the spirit of a road end obviously is not just for uh the uh enjoyment or lack of enjoyment of of that neighborhood.
Uh that's the purpose of the development of road ends and a strategic priority.
It is for all of you royal residents.
The 2022 to 2026 financial plan has polyplaced in there as number one, uh in no particular order, I'm not sure.
Um, but I I do acknowledge it's a unique area.
Uh I visited obviously several times.
I know the area quite well.
Um I guess my question to staff is uh and and maybe it's to you, uh how how much how much encroachment are these homes uh and built onto Town of Ural property?
And I'm not pointing fingers.
This is this is what happens over time is that uh homeowners appropriate land uh for various reasons, uh not knowing the area.
I'm sure we're we all probably have a bit of it.
Uh but how much would go into something like that?
Uh of identifying it and and asking individuals to remove property or or whatnot.
Uh yeah, through uh thank you, Chair.
With respect to encroachments, which I believe is our first question, uh, a survey was done uh before implementation of a design.
And in terms of buildings and houses, I can't speak with respect to setbacks, but there's very little encroachments.
The one large encroachments are the driveway accesses because the driveways uh quite literally go into this road and and then from there funnel out towards Kingham Place.
So that is the one uh encroachments that I think um through time, uh both the town and uh and the homeowners have enjoyed a uh a non-bona five but good agreement.
Uh another question to staff, perhaps procedurally, uh to Ms.
Jones.
Uh what I'm hearing is that this would not be um suspended indefinitely, but more of a temporary suspension of poly place.
Is that fair?
The motion was to move it to 2023 as a project.
Uh I don't think so.
It was for the this 2022 project.
It was this year.
It it what it it is a 2022 approved project, yes, in the in the capital plan.
Right.
And the design has been done through consultation with the adjacent property owners.
And I thought your motion was to move it to 2023.
No, I stand corrected.
At all.
Okay.
Uh another question to staff.
Uh what if any issues uh or advantages are there to uh temp I'll call it temporarily suspending um construction in that area because it sounds like we can't permanently suspend it because it is our property.
Uh is there any comment you'd like to make on the spot or would you prefer more time to uh bring something back about this.
Um yeah thank you chair for the question.
Uh the recommendation would likely be to move on to another road end project for this year.
Um just looking through the list through the project summary we have next is uh Thomas Park Drive sorry for the uh typo there is not Thomas or it was Thomas Park Drive.
Um based on the design guidelines, that project will be fairly involved.
So given the remaining budget we have this year, it likely it won't it won't be we won't be able to do that project.
So uh the proposal would likely be to move on to either Stillwater or Toby Crescent to continue with the road end project.
The do that the design guidelines have already been done, and the guidelines are just basically guidelines.
We'll likely start to go through engagement in that.
But that would be ultimately be the recommendation, given that this funding structure includes both DCCs and um and casino revenue.
Thank you.
And do you anticipate similar advocates for these other rodents uh and having a replay of what we're going through right now?
I think that would be the $40,000 question.
But ultimately, we're out there to engage, and um the purpose of the guidelines is to not create a 100% design document, it's there to provide a vision for us to engage the public on in those neighborhoods.
Okay.
Certainly, Councillor Rogers.
Sorry, um, I just want to point out that uh number four is Toby Crescent.
And if you look on on our uh map here, Toby Crescent is a green identified area that is very popular with the residents, they would fully support, I'm sure, an improvement to that water access.
Thank you, Councillor Matson.
Yeah, I just have a like I haven't seen what the plan is for this particular site.
So uh what I understand now it's we're not gonna be trying to build down to the water.
We're talking about putting a park bench or something in there.
So so I just have a hard time delaying that for a year when I'm I'm not really sure what the plan was.
And so I would prefer that once that we got we had a look what the plan was before we make any decision on whether just to terminate this for uh or delay this for a year.
Okay, thank you.
Uh I think at this time, uh, if staff's okay with it, uh, because I would call it an item on the agenda, would we have public participation for residents or anyone to speak to this?
Thank you.
If you could come up to the mic and please state your name and address.
Hi there, my name is Erica Holton, and I'm at 137 Kingham Place in View Royal.
Good evening, Mayor and Council.
I'm here this evening to ask you to stop further work on Polly Place and Capital Project and to not make Polly Place a road end, as we believe this is a waste of taxpayers' money and is redundant as a neighborhood does not need to, nor do they want this project.
I am not sure how many of you have actually been to see this location.
Polly Place is a sloped and not easily accessible driveway that was approved many, many years ago as an application to the town of View Royal, previous owners to ourselves.
And it is between two established homes that has been in existence since 1957.
This water access and water view location of Polly Place is redundant because we already have Crane Place Viewpoint on the same street, which is just a few houses away.
So why do we need another?
On Kingham Place, the majority have waterfronts, so the need for water access or views is not like the North View Royal area.
Additionally, in the location, in the local area, we also have the wonderful Portage Linear Park, which provides superior water access and view access for View Royal residents that benefit the town as a whole.
This summer's edition of the Paddler's Beach was well worth the investment.
What is unique to Polly Place is mud.
When we moved to Kingham, we were warned immediately by our neighbors not to let our children and pets out into the waterfront in this area, as the fire department was called, to help pull people from the mud.
This happened to me personally when I was trying to rescue a toy that one of my boys threw out into the water, and it took three people to pull me out, and we nearly had to call the fire department ourselves as that tide was coming up quickly.
This is not safe.
In fact, when the town sent staff to Poly Place to view the area, the staff told us they felt the beach area was not safe because of the mud.
They felt that the town would not, sorry, they felt that the town would need to provide signage so that people did not enter the beach area and walk into the water.
Clearly, this is considerable unexpected liability for the town.
The burden of monitoring and calling for help will fall upon the residents.
Even if you Royal sets this up as a view access point only, you will have to know that people will try to access the water.
Since 1957, our residents has used this area as a driveway to access our home.
And we are extremely concerned about safety.
Safety for the people that may be trying to walk down the driveway as we continue to use it with our cars.
Safety for our kids as they play with others on the street and use this axe to access our home.
And as I am sure you can appreciate, we do not want anyone to get hurt.
In addition to what has been said above and with the survey results from 2015, what you will sorry, and to hear from the local residents, we ask you please stop this the unproductive, unnecessary capital project and put the remaining $30,000 to better use elsewhere.
Please do not make PolyPlace a road and beach or view access.
Thank you very much for your time.
Thank you.
Oh, there we go.
Good evening.
My name is Chad Holton, and I reside at 137 Kingham Place as well, along with my wife Erica, as you met, and my two sons, Nathan and Andrew.
And like my wife said, I'm here also to ask you to stop any further work on PolyPlace Capital Project.
Um, and really to not make it a road end, as we believe that developing this or opening this up is a waste of taxpayers' money, and as you heard earlier, is completely redundant.
Um, and you've seen the documentation that Councilor Rogers has presented, and of course you've heard from Erica.
When we really looked at this, we've been there for 10 years.
Um, we don't really actually think that this was meant as a true road end.
And you heard earlier, not all road ends are the same.
If you look at Stewart and Chancellor, Shoreline, those are very different from Poly Place.
And back years ago in the 1990s when lots were being divided and common driveways were created in between houses, this was created as Polly Place.
So another example of that would be Dragon Lane uh off Robert Drive.
So, as was mentioned earlier, in 2015, the town came out to survey the residents that would actually be using this.
And 85%, and there's others in the room tonight, 85% of people on Kingham Place said we do not want this.
So if you read those survey results, I've attached them and sent them all to you so that so that you can read through them.
There were lots of things that the residents were concerned about.
One of them was disturbing that part of the environment.
So when you look at that area, there's there's a ton of swans that that are there's some swans, there used to be more, but there's only two at the moment that nest in that important bird sanctuary.
Wildlife uses that.
We have blue herons that are that are down there and all kinds of wildlife.
And I don't really understand why, if we have crane place just down the road, we would need to disrupt that part of the portage inland.
It just doesn't seem to make sense.
But I just want to go back to the survey for a second.
So we think it should be left natural.
So in 2015, when we did the survey, um, we was it was turned down at that point by count by by by the council.
And so here we are again, a number of years later, having having that same discussion.
So and then public engagement at that point was significant.
There was a lot of people here to say we did not, we did not want this.
And yet here we are again.
Pushing us forward into the fiscal side of it and talking about uh talking about taxpayers' dollars.
So we look at what's happening in some of the parks and the rota and the different areas in View Royals, and we see that that homeless piece that's that that's happening.
And I look at these public areas and I get a little bit concerned about what's happening once we start putting up signs and saying that we're gonna have this as a public space because at the end of the day, who's gonna police it?
Right?
It'll it'll fall to us, both whether people try to access the water or whether they're going to or whether they're going to be down there in all sorts of hours.
So, as you saw from the letter that I sent, I personally called the police and had a great conversation with them about public spaces, especially public spaces that you can't really see from the road.
So, what's gonna happen down there, and then who's gonna police it?
And we already know how much energy and overworked that the local police forces are.
Adding another space where they may have to police this area does not seem like a very good use of taxpayers' dollars.
And honestly, I just don't think it's reasonable.
So when we step back and look at another $40,000 spend, it's not just the $40,000 or whatever it is, $30,000 to open this up.
It's going to be the maintenance, the property, all the all the property work, the garbage cleaning.
And when you open up these spaces and make these spaces for very small numbers of people, that cost to the city, to the town of U Royal is never ending.
It's going to be there forever.
As soon as these things happen, those costs are never going to stop.
So again, we would just say thank you for allowing us to speak.
We really believe the money is better spent elsewhere, not here, and that you can find better places for it to go to a larger group of people that will benefit from taxpayers' dollars.
And we don't believe that you should open up the end of Poly place.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Is it possible just to stand here?
Because like the height.
Uh maybe you can pull the microphone over.
Yeah.
Okay.
Yeah.
Good evening, Mayor and Council.
My name is Nathan Holton, and I reside at 137 Kingham Place in View Royal.
So this opening and this bench would be placed upon a bird sanctuary.
Now, nature is precious.
Ecosystems are a big part of nature, not just in View Royal, but in all of Canada.
So we must preserve the ones that we have.
We used to have lots of swans on the inlet, now there are only two.
We need to keep the two that we have and not disturb them.
We've hundreds of geese and ducks a year come and go.
They are in our ecosystems, and we must protect them.
There are herons that live here all year round, and we must protect them.
Not only that, but there is a heron nesting tree close close to the proposed opening space.
There are eagles close by, and we must protect them.
There is a family of woodpeckers living in the exact area that is being proposed for this opening.
Countless species of bird birds live on our beautiful inlet.
Putting in this bench and opening up this space would only disrupt the bird sanctuary.
We had we have lots of public spaces for use on the inlet.
Is that really what you would like to do?
Do we really need to add another one?
Thank you very much for your time.
Thank you.
Yes, sir.
Please, hello, my name is Duncan Hayden, 58 Kingham Place.
Uh I was at the meeting in 2015.
I was opposed then, and I'd like it to be on record that I'm still opposed.
And I'm also opposed to any other road end developments anywhere on Kingham or St.
Giles.
Um I'll just mention one thing at that meeting back in 2015 regarding the police.
They uh talked with residents and outlined the crime and policing aspects of it, and the mayor at that time was upset that the police took the time to consult with residents, and I found that really odd.
But anyway, that's all my comments.
Thank you for your time.
Thank you.
Are there any other members of the gallery who wish to speak tonight?
No.
Okay.
Uh any other comments from Council Mayor Tobias?
It sounds like that would be uh amending the motion on the floor.
Yes okay uh proceeding I would propose that we remove polyplace uh from uh the capital project expenditure for road ends and divert the existing funding into the other identified road ends uh there's a new motion on the floor.
Well, I'll second it.
It's very similar to the one I made, but anyway, we're we'll keep it rolling.
Seconded uh for discussion, uh Merito Baez, you would like to speak to that.
Any any further or okay.
Councilor Rogers, would you like to speak to any further?
Would any other members of council?
Uh Councillor Matson.
Yeah, I mean I this is public property, and the fact that there's a lot of residents who have waterfront and may not need the opportunity to uh sit back and and enjoy the uh enjoy a view of the water.
Yeah, I just have a problem with that concept where you know we've got what we need, and there's many other people in the community who don't have waterfront acts or have access to the waterfront.
And when I initially heard this, it was I thought it was we're going to try to you know work our way down to the water.
But what I understand, and again, I haven't seen a picture of what we're planning, is they're going to pick a nice spot uh by the trees for a park bench for people who are walking by to go out there, have a seat, sit down, enjoy the enjoy, enjoy the atmosphere, and take a look at seeing what's happened out in the water.
And the fact that there's other of these further further down the road is sort of beside the point because again, this is town property, and we're trying to make a piece of property available to other residents.
And so, you know, if we want to delay this one for a year, I mean I don't have any problem with that.
But the concept of us taking it off totally uh again, we'd just be giving town property to those individuals who have have built beside you know now have their roads on town property.
And I I just have a problem with that whole concept.
Thank you.
Uh Counselor McKenzie.
Um yeah, I have an issue with removing it completely.
Um, given the fact that it is View Royal Land and possibly in the future could be raised again.
I would want the owners and future owners to be aware that this that this might happen.
Um by removing it completely, I fear that it would that expectation would be off the table.
And um I don't think we can guarantee that since it is V Royal property.
Thank you.
And I just want to get a quick pulse here from uh both of my colleagues on my left and right to see uh where this is going.
Uh I I'm gonna support the motion, the amended motion.
We haven't called the question on the amendment, but yes, I don't I I would support the the motion the way it's read right now.
You would support the amended motion by Meritobias.
Okay.
Okay.
Uh councillor Lemon.
That seems the pressure's on you here.
It is.
I have a question for staff.
Okay.
And in the amended motion, staff, um it is suggested that the the funds go to other other projects that are on the books.
Would would that money be used or is it necessary?
That's a good question for it's we're talking about a project for this year.
So the idea would be to take a project that's meant for the future and bump it to this year.
And that would be what we would do.
That's impossible.
What we could do is through the leadership of the council, come up with a plan to determine what we could which project we can bring forward.
Okay, so if I may to staff, if if we can't bring a project forward and get cracking on a on a road end between now and December 31st, what happens with that money.
That's a good question, maybe one for our director of finance if she's still here.
Director Christensen Yes certainly um what it really means is that because this project is funded by DCCs and casino revenue, it just means that that money is not used this year.
The money remains in those funds for use in the future.
Okay, good.
Thank you very much.
So based on that, I can support.
So it it's it's not visible.
It doesn't look like it's it's a place, really.
So um I will I'll support the motion.
The amended motion.
Okay.
Uh and I will voice my support for counselors Matson and Mackenzie on the basis that uh I don't think it should be uh completely removed in perpetuity, uh although delayed uh and pushed down for future consideration.
However, uh it's time to vote.
So all in favor of the amended motion.
Staff, you have the amended motion.
Yes, okay.
Uh by uh mayor to bias, seconded by councillor Rogers.
All in favor.
Opposed.
Uh the vote's four to three, and the motion carries.
Okay.
Uh moving on to uh nine point one point two staff report, view royal repairing improvements, federal funding request.
Second.
Second, okay.
Um, I think for the benefit of uh our new colleagues, it'd be nice to have a short presentation.
Uh and for the gallery.
Thank you.
Thank you, Chair.
I don't have a PowerPoint, but I can certainly provide clarification on the on the report or in some background.
Um so, long story short, uh the town has been graced with annual funding to view roll a park around the hundreds of thousands year over year to help improve it.
Um recently the town has uh created a a View Royal Parks Master Plan that's been adopted by council, which is an overarching long term and short term document to determine what to do with the park.
Um this year, the plan was to improve the riparian areas to remove invasives, uh, create a wetland area and a saltwater marsh.
Uh, uh, that's in accordance to the master plan.
These costs that you have in the back of your of your report were based on a 2010 takeoff with inflationary measures uh put on top of it to bring it to about 2020, 2021 levels.
As we continue to go through the design, uh the engineers and the and the uh biologists that provided a quantity takeoff or a cost estimate or revised one to be in line with the current conditions.
As we know, uh the costs of construction has gone up considerably.
Uh, there's labor shortages that has increased the demand for these uh for these trades.
And what we found was that the project as it stands right now would be over budget by a substantial amount.
So we had two options.
One is to reduce the scope, would be to reduce the wetland area and the saltwater marsh which is a substantial amount and the other option is to go with the uh to seek funding now at the time of um of when we were looking at funding measures there was a natural at a uh federal government natural infrastructure grant uh that had a closure at a time when there was no council was during the time when the month that we didn't have any council so and typically what we do is we move we uh bring forward these grants to council first to seek adoption to uh that we can seek funding.
But given that there's no council, it was decided to uh move forward with the grant application uh with the condition that in the future we'll bring this forward to committee and the council as a result.
So ultimately, the recommendation of this report is to uh utilize the federal government's fund to fund the installation of the wetland and saltwater march as part of this year's riparian measures if we get successful funding from them.
Thank you.
Uh we have uh a motion and a seconder, and actually, Councillor Rogers is ready to speak to his motion.
Yes, please support it.
Uh thank you.
Thank you very much for for working and and taking such a proactive action with on this uh really critical uh and enhancement to VWOP.
I I understand Peninsula streams has uh been part of this uh effort as well peninsula streams has not it has been a design that was done through um so there's two parts of this there is a stormwater management improvements part and then there is the improvements at the riparian area so we have hired uh consultants for both of those to provide that's um that design okay i i think one of the uh amazing uh benefits of this is uh enhancing the uh crave clerk creek and and uh obviously the uh the the salmon stocks so um thank you so much for doing this any other comments from council?
No.
Merit Tobias.
Just one uh question.
Is there any monitoring of the riparian zone uh done uh year after year?
Water levels, turbidity.
Do we are we getting data from our work to see how it's improving the riparian zone and as well just monitoring with climate change the uh the ability to create a habitat for fish to spawn?
In terms of monitoring the park, it would be informal in the sense that we have park staff that are there to maintain our parks.
And in addition to that, we do have the program uh through Green Teams, the removal invasives, and they spend some time in V Roll Park from time to time.
Uh those are the times where we monitor it, uh, and I would say that it'd be informal.
Thank you.
Opposed, that's carried.
Uh motion on the floor.
All in favor?
Thank you, uh Director.
And uh this will bring uh parks and rec to conclusion.
There is no new business.
If you were here uh for parks and rec now is an opportunity to exit stage left unless you'd like to stay for the next portion.
Thank you.
Thank you counselor and I think I at this point it's committee reports, or we just uh we've already been down to the end of parks and recommend so committee reports.
I don't think there are any.
I think Allison was going to do a speech.
Let's jump right to uh Councillor McKenzie on the environment, which you may not have got anything yet.
Um no, unfortunately I I don't have any, I think, under this um this section.
But yeah.
Thanks.
And to Councillor Mattson for planning development and engagement.
Thank you.
All open the planning development and engagement meeting.
Uh nothing under chair's report.
And the first item is the rezoning application for 335 Stewart Avenue.
So after staff does their presentation, if the property owner would like to say something before we get into questioning staff, that works with everyone.
Thank you.
Thank you, Chair.
Jeff Chow, Senior Planner.
This is an application for rezoning at 335 Stewart Avenue to rezone the property, which is uh uh to permit an addition to create a larger house with a total floor space of 550 square meters.
The current property, the property is currently zoned R1, and which has a maximum floor area of 372 square meters and a maximum floor space ratio of 0.42 to 1, which is 42% of the lot.
The proposed zone is which would be a new zone, and it's called the comprehensive development zone.
The difference between this zone and the existing zone is that the maximum house size would be 550 square meters.
So because it's a very large lot, the floor space ratio is 0.18 to 1, which is um which is below the uh maximum floor space ratio in the R1 zone uh this is a site plan that shows the development concept for the property um in a residential single family residential type rezoning we don't look at the farming character of it we just look at what the floor space is in this case the applicant has provided a concept of what they intend to build and uh you see on this this site uh on the um site plan here that uh that the site is large but it does have a number of constraints and those include being on the waterfront uh which means there is a 15 meter uh development permit area for um for protection of the natural environment.
There's an existing house on the property, which is a constraint on where they can also build an addition.
The proposed addition is at the near the front of the house where there's a where there's currently a gravel driveway.
And as mentioned earlier, there are archaeological features on this property.
Proposes to put the house in the new addition in a location that would impact the fewest number of trees.
It's outside of that development permit area, is away from several known archaeological sites on the property, and would otherwise comply with the two-meter side yard setback that the existing zone requires and is also accessible to the driveway.
So this what we also introduced now is some additional information on tree impacts through an arborist report that was conducted.
There's 14 trees on the site, of which three are protected species types.
There's 27 hedging cedars that are not protected, but still count as vegetation.
None of those are proposed for removal in the applicant's concept.
The proposed addition would be a slab on grade to sort of minimize the amount of excavation that is needed and would be in a location that is currently a gravel driveway.
Minimal impacts can be anticipated if the arbor's report is followed, which includes requirements for tree protection fencing, arbor supervision, and special excavation techniques.
It's called hydro vacuuming.
Some of the footings are proposed within the drip line of a uh of a uh almost one-meter diameter uh Douglas may pole.
Uh and there may be some some pruning, uh some root pruning may be required.
Um but with uh arbor supervision under certain certain uh tree protection measures, the uh arborists' contention is that is that the tree can be uh retained.
Here's some photos showing the uh from from the street uh where the where the proposed addition would be.
This also shows the vegetative screen between the two properties.
This is a view from the front of the existing house.
Again, that shows the building footprint proposed building addition in white, and it also shows you the uh the Douglas maple that's uh that's in question.
Uh in terms of site servicing, um no significant impacts are are required.
It is a single family dwelling and will continue to be so and we'll will um we'll be able to additional servicing advance should be accommodated.
So the next step is um is to um is to um motion is to receive the application report.
And if there are any uh additional information, um council can request it now.
Otherwise, the application would move forward to first and second reading, followed by a public hearing.
That concludes the report.
So if the applicant would like to come and make a presentation.
Sorry, I didn't press it hard enough.
Hello, Council and Mayor.
My name is Lee Critchley.
I am here on behalf of the applicant.
Um I have filed the paperwork for it for Brian Richards.
Um do you want me to address some of the concerns from the the um other party members here, or would you like me to answer your questions with regards to this application?
Jeff did a great job of uh highlighting most of the key points.
We have a little bit of information that is more prevalent with regarding to the setbacks and things of that nature in the square footage.
So I'm trying to so this is your opportunity to give information to the committee.
Okay.
So whatever you think is relevant.
Okay.
Uh I think a couple things that are really relevant to this property, as I was mentioned earlier, was uh people were concerned that this would be setting a precedence for other homeowners.
The difference with this is that uh this house was already approved, or this project already had a building permit for a house that's even bigger than what we're we're trying to do right now uh from this client that was um that is on the property right now, the homeowner.
Some of the works that were involved with this were carried out um with regards to having to do the upgrading of the sewer system.
Uh the work down on the dock at the wharf, that was part of his original application.
Some of the landscaping around it.
The client had health concerns, uh, had to have actually battle for his life.
And that put a pause on the project.
Now we're renewing the project.
We've adjusted it, trying to take in consideration the fact that there's so much cost involved with uh a site that has mentioned as Gary had incurred costs.
Brian had get incurred costs.
I believe Tony did too for archaeology with building.
Um, now those costs would even be through the roof higher.
So we're trying to keep it on the footprint of the driveway.
That is the location uh that is proposed.
Um, also the riparian area, and obviously there's the rules for the property.
Um, while we understand why those are needed in a in um uh in a zoning application, what we're trying to do is just to move to be able to adjust this home so that he can have a garage on it.
Um we see that uh when people are mentioning 4100 square feet, they haven't taken out the garage.
Even in their own homes, the square footage is adjusted for the garage, so that's removed.
Some of these garages are bigger than that already.
So some of that square footage is included in the whole house mass.
The main floor isn't a living space on this house, it is more of a storage space.
It works for myself because I'm under six feet, but everything on the bottom floor of this house is six feet.
Brian hits his head on it all the time.
I even have to repaint the ceiling because of blood marks.
So with that, if we took that square footage out of it and we took the garage out of it, then we're really not looking at a big number, bigger than any of the neighbors, but definitely on a bigger property size.
So that's it.
Okay.
Um so probably have an opportunity to ask staff questions and then provide comments on what you think of the uh applicant application.
So we're good.
Okay, thank you.
Okay.
Just before uh so staff.
Just in terms of counting space, garages, etc.
are normally counted in terms of the the total total space in a project.
Um through you, Share.
Uh when you have an attached garage, the first 45 square meters, roughly 500 square feet, is not included in the floor space calculation.
Okay, so in terms of this project?
Uh it would not be included in this.
So the plans that are shown do show a sh were intended to show a garage, and those would not be part of the the floor space that's that's shown here.
Okay, so the 4100 square feet we were talking about includes or doesn't include the garage.
Yeah.
The 550 square meters that the total amount does not include the garage space.
Okay, thank you.
So I waiting nice down here.
Alison, Jerry, Don.
Sid and John.
Okay, so Alison first.
I'm not sure who to address this to, if um, but I wonder do we know what the intended use of the property is?
I know I or future use, i.e.
could this uh add-on be in the future like a secondary suite uh through the chair.
Uh the R1 zone and and the proposed zone would permit secondary suites as accessory use however um with the floor plan with site plan they've got I'm not sure that they can meet the parking requirements in terms of having um there's basically three spaces that are needed outside a garage of which one uh needs to have free access so I'm not sure that the site is laid out with the with the current driveway uh the secondary suite is permitted would be uh would be uh achievable okay thank you thank you sorry question yeah um I think it might be to the applicant um uh earlier uh one of the uh members members of the audience um said uh that perhaps with a few modifications like further setbacks, smaller um size that perhaps they'd be more amenable to this.
Um do you think that's something that would be considered?
Yes, definitely.
That we already have an adjusted plan handed it for that.
Okay, thank you.
Sorry for clarification, you've already reduced in size, or you're already considering reducing it in size?
We've already uh proposed a drawing where it is reduced in size, not to below the threshold um for R1 zoning, but it is set back from the property line another four feet on top of it.
So it would be a total of 9.5 feet at this point in time, is what we have for a drawing with regards to it.
So we're going backwards.
Brian's willing to step the size of the garage down to be able to give a little bit more space with regards to the corridor that's in between.
He feels it's it should be mentioned that he has supplied all the costs and built the corridor.
It is built above the compacted driveway.
So the root structure of the majority of the trees are definitely not in the driveway because the driveway is three inch plus rock.
That's shown in some of the uh the uh digging that was done in place with regards to the archaeological footprint in that area, that has already been done.
That's why we're saying that it's it's not such a concern at this point.
Because that has been done to put all the sewerage and everything in that area.
Okay, so thank you.
So, staff, should the committee decide that us that something along the line that the applicant is suggesting would be something we would prefer as opposed to what's here, it would then come back to us to another committee of the whole uh through the chair.
Uh we're at a stage where um if there is a different uh floor space number that is proposed, that could be incorporated into a bylaw for council's consideration.
Okay, thank you.
Okay, but Jerry, next question.
Thank you.
Um, just for clarifications to staff.
No, don't you go anywhere?
So originally this was a development permit that was went through the Board of Variants, correct?
Through the chair.
It was approved by council a number of years ago.
It was for uh it was a div it was a development variance permit to increase uh to permit a larger house size.
Um that approval lapsed.
So so why it but but it wasn't um it it wasn't going to be a whole new um type of zoning, correct?
Like what was different than why why do we change from just doing another development permit to a rezoning?
Um that's because the zoning bylaw got adopted in 2014 and uh the maximum floor size became part of became a density figure.
So you couldn't um you couldn't previously you could vary it under the current bylaw, um you would have to rezone.
Thank you.
Okay.
Um and to staff, were you were you aware that there's proposal to down downsize scale down the the um prop the the project?
Um through the chair.
Uh I think we received an application and and sort of that's what we've that's what we're presenting to you uh if there is continued negotiation uh the we could sort of incorporate those changes into a bylaw yeah thank you so i'm wondering if this is actually moot if we should if if if if it's a whole new um proposal going forward if the if this is is it so worth considering further sure i guess what we'd first be doing is determining whether we want to see something smaller and larger because for every if the majority is happy with what's here but no and so we're not gonna find out until we sort of have a job with everyone.
And then just simply ask that question.
Okay.
And I'm I'm guessing that you on behalf of the applicant, or maybe it's the applicant who conducted the petition, why did you not survey or or seek um the approval of the neighbors, like the the next door neighbors and beyond?
So that aspect um the applicant or the landowner himself wanted to do.
He felt that he had a relationship already established with many of the neighbors in the neighborhood.
So that's what he had done.
Based on how some um discussion had gone that he felt he had, he made a choice that uh to maybe not talk to people that he felt were against it.
I guess that would have to be a question for the homeowner.
Um I can't answer that out.
Okay.
I'd be speculating, I apologize.
Got it.
Thank you very much.
Yeah, some of my questions have been answered.
Is it my turn?
Sorry.
Okay.
The uh my concern was the the the use of the building.
Uh Councillor McKenzie answered that portion of it.
Uh to me, it doesn't fit in with with the neighborhood.
I do have concerns that not all the neighbors were were were talked to, spoken to.
Um, and I like to see something come back a smaller size, definitely.
And there's some uh at least one large tree that has to be removed, which is a concern for me as well.
Um and also the precedent the setting the precedent that's probably the biggest concern that I have because I can see other neighbors saying well they got a uh the variance why can't we do the same thing?
And that I think that's my biggest concern.
Uh dam Damien and then Sid and John I'll try to stay on point with my question although it's tempting to go on other areas.
Tell please, Mr.
Christie, please tell me about the archaeological impact of the site.
I know it's been brought up anecdotally, but uh maybe you could share that with us.
I can't pretend to know all the details with it with regards to it.
I have read the reports.
Uh there was significant costs that were involved with the initial undertaking of building this uh 6,000 or 6695 square meter home that uh was the initial plan.
Um I believe in the figures when I was digging through the research there was over 25000 involved in that plus the cost of running the preliminary preliminary sewage upgrade up to the street.
Those were all incurred at the time um so in answer your questions, there's definitely history on the properties.
History in that whole neighborhood.
There's history in the park right beside it also um it's still up for debate exactly what it was.
Some research says it was native cooking grounds, I guess.
Or I apologize if any of that terminology is not politically correct.
Question to staff.
Am I correct in saying that that would be the responsibility of the province of BC to oversee that portion?
The chair, that's correct.
It just seems to me, uh, Mr.
Chair, that we've got um we're close to um, you know, there's a concern right now that I've heard about not meeting zoning.
And I don't think there's a great deal of delta between what you proposing and the zoning.
Um we've got a setback issue with uh an immediate neighbor that I think was within the zone of playing, and we've probably got a total square footage thing.
So I think if there's play in there at all, um I think both parties, uh, you know, neighbors and um the development uh, you know, permit uh would be not only supported by neighbors but by council.
I think that I've got concern right now in looking at filling a lot entirely with house.
Um and and the more you creep up there, that's where you kind of get.
So I I think you're really close to something that could do it.
And I just recommend you work closer with your neighbors so that um, you know, you're not doing something that they're immediately going to oppose and maybe they're they're part of your solution as well and I also know with neighbors that you kind of grow apart especially with covet and don't get the opportunities to talk especially if there's been illness too but I think they're your best friends when it comes uh to supporting what goes on in your in your property because they've got to live it too.
That's also thanks.
John.
Yeah thanks um you know I I really get the idea that you're um wanting to preserve uh a large portion of the the land um not not only from you know the archaeological cost but also the you know the saving the trees and uh which is a really beautiful site um but I'm struggling with the the the fact that you're you're saying um the current design or the design that was there is now costing too much so we're gonna impose this large building on the neighbors that's kind of feeling I got um I also the sense I get from the uh the residents in the area is that it uh it doesn't seem like it fits the the ambience of uh the community now um I I it's hard for me to determine that because I only got one view um of uh this existing house and an incredible box, you know, pretty daunting box.
Um, but I have no other views.
I have no sense of what it's like on on the south side or the north side.
I have no sense of what that uh that structure would be like from your your neighbor's pro or the neighbor's property 33A.
I'd love to have a picture from their lot, their lot looking at your at um at 335, and so I could see the size of this building, see get that in perspective of of uh the vegetation, and and I have you know, if obviously you'd be replacing the trees.
Um and speaking of the tree, that the um I I read the report and I hope the arborist is right that this structure would not impact the tree.
But I'm from Missouri.
And the you know, the amount of uh trees that are severely impacted where we thought that wasn't gonna happen.
Uh, I understand there's gonna be significant root pruning that would be necessary, and there's a methodologies uh provided by the Arborst, but uh I'm still a little gun shy on that.
Um I hear there's a difference.
You know, that I understand that the town's got this uh setback of two meters, I'm here in four, you're going three.
Um so I think uh there's some room for further discussions.
Gotta talk it over with your neighbor.
So um it's all right, you you had a handout.
I apologize, I was gonna allow you a few weeks.
So um yeah, I I guess I would need to hear uh a little bit more um on on this and getting more pictures um because at this point I'm a little nervous about going ahead.
Thanks you have a last um yeah, I have a question for staff.
Um we were talking about the the setting of precedent but um are there other ones that have already gone through this and have already already set the precedent as it were yeah um in this neighborhood there haven't been many uh requests for increased floor space we have received others in the town in the past okay thank you so so far I've heard I think the general consensus is really nice if you went back to neighbors yeah yeah.
Oh, sorry.
My apologies.
So what I said was I understand from what my colleagues have said that they would like you to come back with some like you to work with your neighbor and potentially come back with something that you can both agree on as uh meet your needs as well as as the neighbors' needs.
Um terms of my feeling on on this project, I mean I I sort of view this as um like a variance in in terms of it's just one house beside another, although it's more important because it's a rezoning.
And and in general, if the adjacent neighbors are really concerned and have a problem with it, I I really have a hard time supporting either a variance or in this case a rezoning, I would put a really large uh building right adjacent to property.
So hopefully that when you come back uh or if I yeah hopefully you'll be able to work out with uh Gary something that you both can live with and make it easy for easier for us to uh make a decision in your favor.
Jerry?
Um and and I'm there is some concern about a one-off zone, one house, one zone.
So I, you know, maybe maybe I'm extrapolating here, but if if it could be fit into the existing zone, even to the limits of the existing zone, that would be preferred.
Correct?
Yeah, so based what I've heard from staff, correct me, staff, is um I think you're allowed about 4,000 square feet for a for a home in this area, and it doesn't really matter how big the lot is.
So we would have to increase, give them this uh rezoning before we'd be able to build a bigger house.
Is that close?
That's close.
Okay, thank you.
Um so I think we're finished with this for now.
You we've heard and there isn't really a decision to be made from us, it's just we've had the discussion and we're just providing information in terms of you um so work with the neighbor and then chat with staff.
Appreciate.
Thank you.
Okay, thank you for your time.
All in favor?
Against?
Carried.
Uh and staff, I'm having problems with my machine here because it doesn't really give me a picture of what's next on the agenda.
Oh wait, here we go.
Uh okay, if we have development permit application 1681, island highway.
Staff take it away.
Great.
Just gonna get this presentation loaded up.
Thank you.
This is um so we have uh two applications here for the same property.
Uh one is a development variance permit and one is a development permit.
Uh this first application is for a development variance permit to permit it's for signage, and it's to permit um changeable uh changeable copy for for a sign of the Burger King at uh 1681 Island Highway.
Uh there's also a variance for the height of a uh height over vehicle circulation areas.
Uh proposal is to permit changeable copy where the zoning bylaws sign bylaw does not permit uh changeable copy, and there's a sign clearance area of four meters for for where vehicles go, and the proposal is for 2.7 meters.
Uh the um this is basically for for menu ordering boards at the Burger King uh in the drive-thru, uh and they're kind of located in the corner of the building near the Wilford Road intersection with Island Highway.
There is one existing freestanding sign that would also would remain.
These are the existing signs that are that are at the drive thru and the proposal is to replace it with two signs.
This is more modern design that they propose and it would have a cover for vehicles as as people place their orders.
The other sign is a more of a traditional pedestal type sign and would basically show the uh the menu items.
This is a street view photo that indicates that in this case, this situation, these signs are actually not really visible from the road.
And unlike other changeable copy signs you see elsewhere, it's not quite as impactful on the streetscape.
That's an older type sign.
And we actually have a covenant on that one to not restrict the amount of motion that that happens.
So the next steps, uh, depending on what questions or comments the committee may have, uh, we can conduct mail notification for an upcoming council meeting to consider the application.
That concludes the report.
All right, let me know who all would like to speak, and I'll just so many of you have to put you down now.
Sid, do you John?
You too?
Okay.
Don.
Just a question on the sign bylaw.
Uh it says clearly in the sign bylaw, no electronic signs in the town of V Royal.
I actually had to rent a sign in Langford for my changeable sign, uh, the one going to Starlight Stadium.
I actually rented that for four weeks prior to the election because in the sign bylaw says no electronic sign.
So I have some difficulty with approving this when I had to move to Langford to put my sign up for the left.
Just a point.
Staff, do you want to comment on that?
Not not the fact that he had to rent a sign, but uh how the electric sign works.
Yeah, he wouldn't he'd been welcome to apply for a variance.
But you have to amend the bylaw.
Uh this is these uh for this type of sign, people would have to come by and apply for a variance to to permit that.
So so you could have applied for a variance.
Thanks, Tom.
Uh Sid first.
Uh I've got no problem with anything except the movable sign.
I think if we've set a precedent that we're saying that there shouldn't be a movable sign, it's probably there for a reason.
One is that I'm an attentive driver, and so when I see squirrels moving around, it sometimes distracts me.
And I don't think that's a great place to be distracted, to be honest with you.
So that's the only comment I have.
So staff, just for clarification, there is a movable sign just up the road, but we've limited it to how fast it can move.
But can you actually see the sign from the road?
I guess that's one of the concerns.
Yeah, the proposed signs are they're they're basically within the drive-thru area and they're they're screened by uh by vegetation there.
I thought that you were sorry for interrupting, but I thought you were saying that the sign there with the change it will copy the is the one that they're asking for.
But if it's within the driveway, I'm not sure.
They're asking for right of the building right there.
Okay.
I just wanted to clear.
There we go.
Uh Sid.
Oh wait, wait, wait.
You're uh Robin here.
Jerry.
Just uh I I don't struggle with this, but I do have a question about the uh changeable copy.
Does that and without being whatever?
Um does that mean if the price of a whopper changes, they can't change it on their sign?
The purpose of it it would it would make it easy for them to change the price uh as you're driving through the drive-thru, yes.
Yeah.
I think right now they'd actually have to go out and put a new piece of plastic on it.
Whereas now they'll it's they'll just be able to push down download something and it'll it'll go onto the screen.
Um John.
Yeah, thanks.
Okay.
So um when you've shown me the drawings, um uh and I don't know what page uh we're on here.
We question variance is the next one here which says pre-ordered the new menu board.
Thank you.
I don't which one is the changeable sign?
Uh through the chair, both would be changeable.
Ah.
So okay, now so I understand that.
Okay.
We're getting hotter.
Is the height, you know, with the height that they're talking about 2.7 meters, um, sign clearance.
So is that presenting an issue if we have a truck that's uh three meters high?
Uh through the chair.
Um, I think most most large vehicles wouldn't be able to make it through that driveway because there are a number of turns on it already.
So it's it's actually kind of only smaller vehicles can make it through that drive-thru.
Okay.
So so it's reasonable um to uh permit the the lower height.
Yeah.
Okay, thank you.
Don?
The the existing sign that you have on your previous slide, that used to be Bad mad macaze it's not called bad man mac's anymore but is that still still operating because i don't that yeah the one up here on the left there yeah this the sign is still there i haven't i haven't looked to see i don't think it's ever been in use for years i don't yeah as far as i've remember anyway oh okay so can you just one question sure sure so staff so you're not having any problems with the refresh rate or we don't add uh need to add any stipulations to this um through through the chair.
Sometimes staff would comment on that.
In this case, it is for a drive-thru.
So if it was like a if they were proposing a a changeable copy sign that's attempt meant to attract the attention of you know drivers and pedestrians, then I think that's something that council can sort of consider.
In this case, I don't they do have a refresh rate, I think, of up to eight seconds or something.
I think it was in the proposal.
Um I don't think that would have a negative impact on the streetscape.
Okay.
So now this we can just quickly if anyone has any great objections to this, now's a good time to let the applicant know.
But if everyone's happy, then we can just proceed and just receive motion to receive it be in order.
I'm favor again.
Motion to receive B and C.
Oh, wait, wait.
Um so C is a little different though.
It's the building as opposed to the sign.
Isn't it the two two signs?
That's different.
Motion to receive B separate.
Motion to receive B.
Okay.
On favor.
Oh B, okay, yeah.
B against Carrie.
Yeah.
All right.
This is a development program application for a building refresh of for the building itself.
Uh the proposal, I'll just kind of walk you through this a little bit.
Uh the proposal is to refresh the building, uh basically on on nearly all four elevations of the of the site.
Um the uh the intent is to keep the metal roof that's on the building, uh, but the other part of the building, they would uh have a raised parapet with uh with a red light band on it.
I'll actually only try my our fancy new tool here.
Okay.
And if it's not working now fine, I can oh anyways.
Uh what they're proposing to do is to raise the roof a little bit, add a red band along the top.
This is the the parking lot side of the building.
Uh there would be a slight change in sort of the signage, and uh they would add a new kind of uh graphic sign near the the entrance of the building.
This won't be visible from the graphic sign won't be visible from the street.
Uh this is the island highway frontage of the of the uh of the building, and the change there uh uh would be some uh a sign change, but uh for the lower portion of the building they would raise the parapet up with a um with and change the siding on it to provide some which would provide some variation.
There would also be uh a new canopy added in front of the window.
On the Wilford Road side of the building, uh you you can see the the raised parapet at the corner of the building.
Uh there would be some changes to where the drive-thru windows are.
They propose to add uh a new canopy again at the street level, and also some graphic signs.
And graphic signs are basically um signs that don't have words, but they're basically images uh of you know, in this case, uh hamburgers uh or you know, or or different photos.
Um this would also have the higher parapet, and again, you can sort of see in the uh the red section that would be uh there would be a light band.
So a light band is kind of like uh like a neon sign.
Uh if you're familiar with A and W, they have they have light bands as well on those on their newer buildings.
Uh they would retain most of the existing horizontal siding.
And that's it for that frontage.
And for the driveway side of the building, it's the only thing you'll see is is uh is the the new light band.
Um so this kind of a an this is not a significant redevelopment, uh, but every considerate every development you do have to uh consider how it meets the development area guidelines.
Uh so in this case the new parapets erased in such a way that creates a kind of a cleaner, more contemporary roof line, but they still have like three different roof levels that will make the building not look like it look very boxy.
Uh the sign plan is um that they would actually have um in general about uh a little bit less sign area, but be more effective.
Um and the LED light band is helps to find the building form, especially at night.
But uh staff would like more information on the brightness and intensity of those signs.
Uh the canopies also help to break up uh the sort of the boxy look of the building.
The one thing that staff doesn't uh does not support is the lifestyle graphics signs because they um we consider that they kind of um that there are different ways of making the street level of the building more attractive rather than than these types of images.
Uh they recommend that the applicant look at other other different ways to uh to make the building a bit more um pedestrian friendly.
The wrong way.
So uh the next steps, there's a couple, there's a bit more information that staff is asking for that includes updating, making sure the plans show all the doors, um, and provide some information on the uh on the signs to basically uh update the sign plan to say you know where what are the dimensions of those signs, and also provide a physical color and kind of material sample board because it gives you a better idea of what the materials look like rather than what you see on the screen here.
So if there's any other questions from the uh committee, we can pass those on for the applicant.
Sure.
So just report that includes the report.
So just before we get on the committee, two things.
Uh we can get an example of what that like bad would look like.
I have some concerns there.
I mean, and if there's a building somewhere that has it, and you know, and my understanding was we didn't uh this isn't something we was even included in our uh through our sign bylaw having that uh right right band all the way through.
And and the other question is what's the blue stuff over the windows all about through the chair.
Uh that's their software rendering showing the existing windows.
Okay, so they won't look like that.
And all right, I was a little worried about that one.
Don?
Yeah, I have some concerns.
There's a large development on the hill, uh, multiple condo units there.
And I would be concerned if I was looking up there, what the light pollution would be, and that's where you're talking about the light band.
Um, because looking down on that would not be very attractive for someone's on the on the front of those buildings.
I don't know how many units are there, but I I'm thinking it's around 80 to 100 units up there.
So I'm not sure if any um even if if this the strata might have some comments about that particular signage.
Okay.
Um Damien.
Um my question was gonna be similar.
And actually some of you here were on council when we approved uh the elements casino sign, if you recall that, John and Ron, and they were very concerned about that and there was a lot of discussion about it.
I'm just wondering uh is Burger King are they required to communicate or send out uh do community consultation on lighting, or how does this work for that?
Uh through the chair, for a farm and character development permit, no c no consultation is required.
No if there's no variance and this this building itself has no uh variance with compliance with the zone.
So um so there's there's no uh formal requirement through our bylaws to notify the uh notified neighbors.
Okay.
Yeah, I'm I'm uh in favor of uh communicating with the co-ho residents, uh whoever whichever council did approve that, uh so be it.
It's it's uh 80 or 100 uh the residents living there, so they need consideration.
John.
Yeah, uh I I certainly agree that uh I hadn't thought of uh the light pollution or whatever, but uh yeah, I shouldn's indeed uh they were most concerned about uh vaccine, so I think they that uh respect is necessary.
Um the the new design to the old oh sorry.
Gotcha.
Find me a dollar every time I don't do it.
Um now up to 20 bucks.
Um yeah, the the the old current to what they're proposing.
I don't like the proposed.
It doesn't fit with the uh OCP.
The OCP's you know talks about visual interest.
This is good dumbing it down to blank walls, and you know, I know I I really feel that uh they're taking away a uh a really interesting design uh that that we had fought hard for back in 2000.
Um and it's uh being evaporated.
And um, you know, the less one of the other things in the OCP is no blank walls.
And uh that I don't know what elevation it is, uh north, south, east, west, you know, the one that faces um um Coho.
Terrible, terrible walls that they're there it is right now.
And I don't think what they're proposing is any better.
So it's um I think they have to up their game in in um um uh improving the uh the look on what they're uh asking for here.
Do not like it.
Jerry.
Briefly, um I want to thank you, staff for uh for for um um giving us a heads up and and taking on that really quite unattractive um graphic work on the sides so so thank you for upping having them up the game there and i and i agree with counselor rogers it's pretty ugly um and and the blank wall is is unacceptable allison i might put the odd one out um i i think it's an improvement over what is currently there um i think the design currently is a bit outdated.
But I believe i read that there was a choice that burger king can choose from.
There was like three options, and they decided to go with this style.
So potentially they could present the other styles that might have, I don't know, the lighting on them, but okay.
So what I'm here oh, Sid.
I I'm good with everything except the band uh around it.
It may improve aesthetics, but I wonder what its purpose is.
Like I don't think it's branding.
Is it to provide more light for walking around it?
Another sign.
But that it's like another sign.
Like another sign, but it's just a band of red going around the building.
It's not any value to anybody, is it?
Well, it's it's marketing for them.
Yeah.
Yeah, thanks.
Okay, so I'm getting the majority aren't really all that happy with the design.
There's concerns about that red strip.
I'm glad to f find out that the blue windows aren't going to be blue windows.
Um I don't know, do you need what else do you need from us, or have you got enough from us?
And and uh we can provide that to the applicant before they come back.
Okay, thank you.
And that's it for public, I was gonna say public works and transportation.
I'm just looking at the next one down for planning and zoning.
Motion to receive.
All in favor?
Against carried over to uh counselor waters for public works and transportation well thank you it's uh it's a great honor to uh switch uh ladies with wallet chair they had a great job on the transportation we're another dollar just for doing the mic I guess another dollar yeah yeah that's right absolutely um so thank you very much for all the work on on transportation um it's uh it is certainly something really important in the next four years uh uh particularly with the active transportation component and one hopes a new transportation master plan but I digress.
So uh we'll move straight into staff reports on the Glantana Road traffic calming request.
Thank you, Chair.
Ivan Leoung Director of Engineering and Parks here.
Uh so I bring forward this report to you.
It's based on a February 15, 2022 council meeting and it's uh uh it was a request for a speed hump and at that council uh the resolution was to for staff to basically find new numbers or get new numbers for the community and to bring that forward to the future community of a whole so that's the reason why I'm here.
So based on you know it took a while for us to find the information, and we just realized let's just find the numbers again.
So we put in another uh speed sign at Glentana uh around the middle where the request a speed pump was uh to find our speeds and volumes basically.
The reason why we do this is because in order for a request for a speed hump to come into fruition, it needs to go through the traffic helping policy.
So I'll have that appended in the behind uh the back side of this report.
And there's certain steps that is required in order to start to um install these tangible infrastructure.
Um so based on the numbers we saw, there's three metrics we usually look at in order to escalate to another stage of the policy.
We usually look at um at 85th percentile speeds, we look at extreme speeds, and we look at volumes.
Based on the information we received over the summer, it looked like um the traffic counts indicated a number of vehicles traveling 10 kilometers an hour over the supposed seamlet limit was greater than 5%.
So, in doing so, that does technically uh escalate traffic calming policy to stage one.
In stage one, three things can be done.
It's either the temporary installation of a speed display sign, it is the traffic enforcement actions or the traffic or uh the installation of traffic signs and pavement markers.
Uh as chairs alluded to, we are in the midst of completing our active transportation network plan.
And what we have found, and it's indicated in the what we heard summary there, is that there was um the public has uh notified us of a need to improve active transportation around the area.
So I'm talking about you know, Island Highway by Glentana and Admiral's rover by Glentana.
We don't have it yet.
So there may be some information coming from that report.
Is gonna the finalized report will be uh in will come to us probably around the spring of 2023.
But what may happen is that the Glentana may um may be identified as a potential route for uh promoting active transportation.
So as a result, uh staff is recommending to uh not install the speed humps yet and maybe wait for that plan to come to fruition.
And in the meantime, what we can do is to uh start looking at stage one enforcement measures for traffic bombing.
Specifically with respect to speed humps, there's already two speed humps in the area.
They're about 200 meters apart.
And generally speaking, when it comes to emergency response and every second counts, uh speed humps are generally not recommended.
And there are other options out there in the traffic calming policy, it does state other options such as curb, um curb like bump outs or chicanes.
And that may be something that could be presented as part of the Actors Transportation Network Plan, or at least informed by it, and we can move forward from there.
So at this point, the recommendation to the committee is to deny the request for a speed hump to enact stage one traffic calming measures in accordance to traffic calming policy.
And that further and further that any other subsequent traffic calming infrastructure stipulated under traffic calming policy be deferred until the active transportation network plan is finalized.
Second.
So I have a couple comments.
I don't cycle it.
Um uh my other thing, I think in the person um the individual who wrote in, they identified a number of additional issues, which uh to me don't relate to the speed bomb.
They relate to visibility.
Um actually, I think it was mostly visibility.
Um I think one of the issues kind of adding to that and the riskiness of it is that there's no sidewalk on that, it stops right before this person's address, meaning people cross at that point.
Um, I don't know if that's our public property or if that's actually the Stratus property, but I think there's I just kind of wanted to ask what can we are there things that we need to address other than the speed in relation to this.
Yeah, thank you, Councillor McKenzie, and through the chair.
Uh stage one traffic calming does include because I I I read the email and there was concerns about uh vehicles parked too close to the driveway, which can cause uh site land issues.
You know, our subdivision bylaw does stipulate how far uh vehicles can park through the driveways and there are ways that can that it can be better identified.
And um actually the policy the stage one traffic calming um uh items the specifically you know traffic signs pavement markers so pavement markers could be anything from uh painting the curbs yellow to enacting uh installing signs um it also could include uh some some curbs and that's certainly something that uh staff can look at as part of going towards the stage one part of uh the traffic calming policy so should the recommendation be to enact stage one that that is something that we would look at.
Yes thank you um you know it was difficult for me to figure out where you know if we'd had a a map of of the antenna and and uh you know I get 1500 but I don't know where 1501 is they didn't know I know and it would have been helpful for them to have actually provided their address and and uh the location um I guess my question is um bump outs or chicanes, um, are those more cost effective and more if it would be more reasonably effective if um uh indeed it's it's worthwhile putting additional uh speed controls.
I don't have the exact metrics in terms of uh the chicanes versus speed humps.
Um we can certainly pull examples.
There's several examples within the city of Victoria that do use these.
Um and ultimately it would have to be designed.
So it would in order for it to be effective, uh, it would have to be designed properly and be reasonable.
So it's certainly something that we would look at look at further.
Too bad we can't do anything about um the Glen uh using their driveway as a turnaround.
That's remarkable.
Never thought of that one.
Anyway, so we have a motion to receive.
Any further discussion?
Hearing none, all those in favor, against carry.
Okay, yeah.
That's sorry.
That's um it's a motion to uh staff approve staff's recommendation.
Yeah, okay, my mistake.
Those are in favor against carry.
Okay, asset management program update, please.
Good evening.
Hi, I'm uh Ben Luberts, Deputy Director with the Engineering U Department and co-manager of the town's asset management program.
So the purpose of this presentation is to provide the committee with an update on the town's uh asset management program and build the committee's awareness of asset management within the town of Uroyal context.
So, asset management is a process focused on delivering services sustainably.
It's an integrated process, bringing together the skills, expertise of activity uh and activities of people with information about the communities's physical assets and finances, so that informed decisions can be made in support of sustainable uh service delivery.
And asset management provides life cycle cost management that is.
That is the management of costs throughout the entire life cycle of assets from creation and acquisition to maintenance and operation through to rehabilitation and eventual replacement of assets.
So the town's asset management program is informed by the asset management BC framework for sustainable service delivery, which is shown here.
That's the diagram.
The framework is an industry standard that describes the many components within the holistic asset management program.
So asset management is comprised of four core elements: people, information, assets, and finances.
Each of these elements is necessary for sustainable service delivery, and the success requires the integration of these four elements, core elements, through three ongoing activities, which is communicating, engaging, and reviewing.
And these ongoing activities are applied to some extent in each stage of the asset management process.
Uh entails continuous quality improvement, and this ongoing process involves assessing, planning, and implementing, which is all descripted here in this in the framework diagram.
So starting with the red area here in assess, this part of the process entails ongoing assessment of our asset management practices, such as our maintenance programs, our capital and financial planning processes, our data management processes, and our training and awareness building programs.
And so this presentation here today is considered an asset management practice.
And we also assess the current state of our assets with consideration to age, condition, a depreciation, maintenance, and rehabilitation activities, and historical and future replacement costs.
So moving into the yellow planning area of the asset management framework is the asset management policy, asset management strategy, asset management plans, and the long-term financial plan.
So the policy informs the guiding principles of the program.
The strategy is the program charter that defines the big picture goals and objectives that steers our progress.
The asset management plans are created for each asset class.
So one is created for each type of infrastructure.
And the long-term financial plan projects forward into the distant future to plan for when assets will eventually need to be replaced.
So next month, we will be presenting to the committee, our newly developed long-term financial plan.
It's titled the Sustainable Infrastructure Replacement Plan.
And we'll also be presenting our asset management policy.
So finally, into the green area is the implementation process of our asset management practices and the measuring and reporting of our performances through key performance indicators.
And then back into a red, into the red and around the circle and the framework, it goes.
In addition to those benefits are the understanding of the full cycle life cycle, full life cycle cost of asset ownership and the coordination of departmental efforts and the continual improvement of business processes.
So, in regards to tolerance to risk, unfortunately, infrastructure-related emergencies are a common reason why local governments discover the importance of asset management.
Indeed, much of the advancement of asset management discipline across the globe has come as a response to acute and impending crises.
So asset management offers a methodical approach to risk management.
So next, in the middle here, to the town of Uroyal, asset management is very important to ensure the town's continued eligibility to receive external funding streams.
So local government's ability to demonstrate competency and ongoing maturation of its asset management journey is becoming a standard requirement for outside funding programs, such as the Canada Community Building Fund, formerly known as the Gas Tax Fund, grant funding through such entities such as the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and the Union of BC Municipalities, and also for borrowing through the municipal finance authority.
So, in order to ensure our eligibility is secure for these external funding streams, it's critical that the town continue to develop and mature its asset management program.
Finally, fulfilling the purpose of the municipality described in section 7 of the community charter.
The arguably the integral reason why asset management is important.
This section of the charter describes the purposes of the municipality to provide services and laws, provide stewardship of public assets, and foster the economic, social, and environmental well being of its community.
Asset management fulfills many of these purposes through its systematic and principles based approach to the management of assets.
So now asset management with the town of View Royal.
So that was a bit of a primer, if you will, and now we're going to dive down into our actual organization here.
So, in terms of service delivery at the town of View Royal, the town provides its community with seven distinct services shown here.
And the services are reflected and further described in our financial plan and our strategic plan.
So the town has been developing and exercising many asset management practices since its incorporation in 1988.
And a primary part of the town's current efforts are to adapt these existing practices into the asset management BC framework.
So the components of our asset current asset management program are shown here.
I won't run through them.
But you'll notice that the program is noted as being in development.
And that is because our asset management, that's because other asset management elements of the asset management BC framework are less developed within our organization and will require the ongoing support from council to develop and to implement.
So I hope you're beginning to appreciate the comprehensiveness and the promise of asset management process.
The asset management process offers many benefits, the most integral of which is informed decision making, which can be played out this way.
So asset management allows us to first define the various levels of service that an asset can provide.
So, for example, from a dirt road in a farming district to a smooth paved surface on an arterial highway, or as an example, a leaky sewer pipe that backs up on occasion to a pristine, tightly jointed pipe with plenty of redundant capacity and a robust maintenance regime that will never clog.
So these are all examples of levels of services that an asset can provide.
That it's cheaper to maintain a gravel road than a than a pothole-free asphalt, smooth asphalt surface.
But is the leaky sewer pipe cheaper than the forever free-flowing sewer pipe?
We can only know by comparing the lifecycle costs of each level of service.
So, and then finally, third here, asset management allows us to equitably distribute the financial burden of providing a certain level of service across the benefiting generations.
So, not just those who benefit here today from that service of the asset, but those who benefit tomorrow and into the future.
So, in summary, uh the town of U Rural's asset management program is informed by the asset management uh of asset management BC's framework for sustainable service delivery.
The program is not yet fully developed, and ongoing support from council through strategic and financial planning processes is critical to ensure the town's ongoing eligibility for external funding streams and for the sustainable delivery of its services.
And then finally, the town is making significant advances in 2022 through the development of its first ever long term financial plan titled the Sustainable Infrastructure Replacement Plan, or SERP, as you see there, and the asset management policy.
And so those items will be presented to the committee for consideration in December of this year.
Thank you for your time.
Thank you.
It's nice to learn a new acronym.
Yes.
Okay.
Um, any uh comments or questions?
Uh the stop recommendation.
All right.
We uh look forward to the presentation.
Thank you very much.
And learning more and finding how much it costs.
Mr.
Thank you very much.
Ringer, there's just an hour left.
Thank you all for what you did things.
Thank you.
Let's get enrolling at the end of it.
That's exciting for now.
Come back at midnight.
Okay, uh Mayor, I can hand it back to you, I think.
We did.
We passed.
Anyways, we only had I just moved it.
Oh, did you just move the correspondence?
No, the uh oh oh sorry.
Oh yeah, sorry, yeah, you moved uh move received.
All those in favor against carried.
Yeah, seconder.
I'll second.
Thank you very much.
We're at question period and we ran out of people.
No, we're on correspondence.
Or correspondence, sorry.
Move receipt move receipt.
All in favor?
I yeah, I think it's um there's a number of items.
There there's a lot, but they're all related.
Well, I actually um yeah, I shouldn't move receipt on on all of them.
There were there was a comment uh recommendations with respect to the uh road noise and uh round of things mail and line.
Yeah, like they're counselor urgent.
Thank you.
David.
Yeah, no, it's so um uh I I would certainly yeah, this is necessary, so I would move that to the town right and request the Ministry of Transportation Infrastructure to install the noise.
Well they've already told they've already said that they're not gonna do it.
Yes, this is a bigger thing that we need to discuss, and these are all related, all of these are about right.
So I I think that we need to have a discussion about it.
The ministry is not going to assist us in the construction of barriers, uh, and we need to dig a little bit deeper into some mitigations, but this is view royal wide, it's not just one isolated area, yeah.
So I guess this would be a question through the staff.
Like, do we have specific parameters around which there's noise highway noise before the town does something or before we go back and ask somebody?
I guess in this case we've already asked and they've told us to go away, but um like how bad is it and is it something we should be planning to to fix?
Thank you through the chair.
I mean ultimately as part of development goes and that's when barriers can be installed.
It's all it's a little different now, simply because one uh the barrier, if one was to be installed, it would be on ministry the land, and that makes it difficult for uh maintenance.
So the capital cost is one thing for this.
But the bigger ticket item is the actual maintenance.
And as you know, when the when there's snow on the ground, the plows go, then you can just check down the highway.
A lot of those panels get damaged.
And uh I've actually just drove around just to take a look at some of these panels, and I don't know if it's a supply chain or or whatnot, but it looks like there's been some temporary replacements and it's like wood planks instead of these concrete panels.
So there is difficulty in both the installation and the maintenance of those items right now.
Um with respect to uh the Chilco area, uh that's certainly one region.
And if one was to be installed there, it may be precedent setting for many other areas in uh View Royal.
And there have been some complaints before about noise elsewhere, and it may it may put us into a little bit of a little pickle for um for not allowing in areas, but allowing in other areas.
What I would recommend that we think about doing is that the concrete barriers are expensive, they break, they don't really work if you're on a floor higher than the concrete barrier.
It's not really an effective sound barrier point.
And unfortunately, the only thing that we've got to buffer is trees and uh I know Sanich is planting I think 300 000 trees this year uh and uh they're they're coming in as seedlings so they're not you know 5,000 oh oh whack but I am sure there is money out there that other using other people's money there are options there are some that don't that uh trees are an effective uh break but I'd suggest we start turning toward data and actually take your iPhone, there's a little app that you can get for a decibel reading, and be able to go into you know properties and say what are we actually dealing with quantitatively?
What decibel range is it?
Is this tolerable?
Is this you know monitor but like not do anything?
And then as that increases or wow this is really we got to do something about it.
Our growth for 10 feet of tree you're looking at seven years, right?
No matter what we plant today.
So it's going to be a long term strategy and of course but I think residents might be able to help us out with that by helping plant some of those trees too like they did in handy dirt.
But uh all of the all of these comments are around the same thing, and they're all and if I I guarantee you by the time the next council meeting is, this list will grow.
Everywhere from Erskine Lane to Stone Bridge, it's it's more noticeable now than it ever was.
I think trees are part of it.
But I'd say the only thing we can do is probably look at maybe some options for tree planting.
And maybe Moti would let us plant on their their border.
Um, you know, and use some of their land space to replant what they took down in the first place.
Unless somebody else has got an idea.
Um for the seven nine phases of Choco.
Um I I honestly I didn't think of uh road noise uh being an issue except for the you know the last uh um phase eight nine whatever it was the last couple of phases and and um you know we let Lamona um you know Clear Clutton Moonscaped the landscape the manscape took out took all the trees out you know we let them do it and uh so those are the consequences the people living there they whether or not they bought knowing but now they know um I don't know what um um you know so we've been the architects of the problem that exists today how and I doubt very much that honestly that the highways would approve because uh highways are gonna probably need their land when they uh think of uh rapid transit on the Trans Canada Highway.
Likely, possibly.
And so they'll they're not I don't think they're be uh willing to give us anything.
They'll need it.
There's something cyclical happening seasonally right now, right?
What's happening right now it's uh trees are or leaves are dropping off of trees that are were causing a buffer.
So it's gonna be every year that we're gonna the only possible solution is step code five.
No trees?
No, step code five is uh when you do the that building has exceptional uh sound uh qualities, uh soundproofing.
But they're already all built, so we don't have to worry about it.
So we've got we've got our issue is we've got five pieces of correspondence more, right now council wall um trees are certainly an answer but but but for the next few years that's just not going to do for people who are being driven out of their minds every night and especially those ones that are right near the highway the newest um lot that have been built in Chilco um you know I mean reasonably it would have been wise at the time for council to have had Lamona put in some kind of kind some kind of barrier but I I I think perhaps we should should ask staff um for some kinds of um reasonable um mitigation that won't take 10 years they did happen to build right beside the or buy right beside the highway.
Well that's and and then yeah yeah yeah and maybe it was just the house they could afford yeah exactly so there there's got some issues there so how do we want as a council to do to address what is at least five individuals concerned I think I've got more emails than these.
Davey had his hand up.
Damien.
I think I can help answer your question.
Uh I would recommend that uh it gets referred to well, it could get referred to the next committee, the whole, and we could discuss it there and staff come back with uh potential options.
I mean, I'm thinking I agree with many of you, we do need to at least come back with some type of an answer, uh, whether that is uh exploring uh planting trees, whether it is communicating and working in partnership with BC Transit to see what their master plan is for uh bus lanes, because sometimes bus lanes uh come part in parcel with fences, right?
Uh and so at least show some forward momentum uh and and be honest and say we are not building a sound barrier anytime soon because we don't have the authority.
And the and the emotions said no.
Damien, I just want to uh pick up your point because uh rapid bus lanes uh as uh transit comes back from Island Highway towards uh downtown um gives us the possibility of improving and placing sound barriers as that lane is built um along Portage Linear Park.
That is a practical example where um you know we could do that.
And yes, I would I the possibility of having tree plantings along Casey Place where there is a path, there is a possibility of that.
I think throughout the there's opportunity there.
Yeah, I don't think it's it's uh a no and it could be on some some land, but yeah, so we need to do a something.
So let's um ask staff if they could um crook get a magic wand and um create some solutions.
But I mean that we're we're not going to be able to eliminate this problem no matter what we do.
There's no question about that.
Um but by the next committee of a whole to report back on options for us to explore um to help lessen the effect that might be a combination of things, but yeah, leave it up to staff to come back.
And question period.
Yeah, yeah.
No one else.
Is there anybody still awake?
Do we have any callers?
Any callers, Mayor Tobias, we have no callers at this time.
Okay.
Motions and notice notices of motion.
If we don't have any.
Um closed meeting resolution.
Unlisted.
And uh can we get um moved to terminate?