Meeting Overview
The Committee of the Whole meeting covered updates from the RCMP and Protective Services, focusing heavily on mental health incidents and homelessness encampments. Financial reports noted capital budget underspending largely due to supply chain issues. The Committee held extensive debates on several high-profile items: approving the Proposed Tree Protection Bylaw (which introduced major changes like removing the building envelope exemption and increasing fines); considering two rezoning applications for Erskine Lane (one seeking increased density, the other for a 99-unit six-story building which was poorly received); and addressing the town's response to winter weather, resulting in a motion for staff to report on options for improved sidewalk snow removal on main thoroughfares.
Key Decisions
- THAT the West Shore RCMP Update be received.
- THAT the report dated January 5, 2022 from the Director of Protective Services titled "Public Safety Report for November - December 2021" be received for information.
- THAT the report dated January 6, 2022 from the Manager of Accounting titled "Budget Variance and Projects Update Report to December 31, 2021" be received for information.
- THAT the report dated January 7, 2022 from the Executive Assistant titled "Action List Update - 4th Quarter" be received for information.
- THAT the report dated January 7, 2022 from the Executive Assistant titled "Strategic Plan 2019-2022 Update" be received for information.
Transcript
2199 segmentsOkay, thank you very much.
Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome back and happy new year to everybody.
I'd like to start the meeting by acknowledging that we are within the traditional territories of the Esquimalt and Songhees Nation.
And with that, I don't think we have anything to add to the agenda.
Um so if everyone's good, I just need a motion to approve the agenda.
Thank you.
In favor, opposed, that's carried.
Is Councillor Mattson with us?
I appear not at this point.
Councillor Mattson is um supposed to be joining us remotely.
And I I suppose I also missed the little bit about um that so public participation and is there's a public participation this afternoon and also this evening, where the the public can comment on any I can't I'm out of practice, any items that are on the agenda today and so when the appropriate time in the agenda you will dial 778-402-9227 and when prompted enter conference ID 851-192-760 pound.
And public participation for this afternoon will come up almost immediately.
So if you're wanting to talk to anything on the agenda this afternoon, please call in now.
And then this evening will be after we reconvene shortly after seven o'clock.
And so with that, I will move to um minutes of December 14th, please.
So moved.
Okay.
Moved and seconded by counselors Lemon and Rogers for approval.
That's carried.
Any comments, corrections?
No.
All in favor.
Opposed.
There's no petitions and delegations.
So public participation period.
Do we have any callers on the line staff?
Your worship, we do at this time.
We do have a caller with the last four digits 9040.
Okay, thank you.
So caller with the last four digits 9040.
This is your opportunity to speak to an item on the agenda.
If you would like to do so.
Please give us your name and address at the beginning.
Caller with the last four digits 9040.
Possibly press star six to unmute yourself.
One more opportunity to the caller with the last four digits 9040.
If you press star six to unmute yourself, this is your opportunity to speak.
Okay, so I think we'll carry on and um I'm gonna hand the chair over to Councillor Lemon for Protective Services.
Thank you, your worship.
And uh we'll begin with Superintendent Preston of the RCNP.
Welcome, sir.
Thank you.
Happy New Year.
Happy New Year.
All right.
Lovely to see you here.
Thanks for uh having me.
So uh as far as the detachment goes, some of the um new things to report.
The new inspector uh has arrived, Inspector Stephen Rose.
So he is uh on the ground working and he came from Parksville attachment.
Uh, we'll bring him by one of these uh meetings for you to speak with.
Um we have our year-end stats uh for View Royal.
We're up 15 percent, 471 files uh compared to to last year.
So we had 30 3617 general occurrences uh compared to 3146 uh in the years prior.
Uh comparatively speaking, from the year prior is 11 11 percent increase in violent crime, a 12% in property crime.
And um the hospital, that one is crept up again at the uh the end of the year here, and it's really not not a big surprise, just the uh the amount of mental health as everybody can see.
Uh, we had we were at the hospital 25 times in uh in December for various calls.
Um the casino, we were up um we were there 12 times.
So 30 between the hospital and the casino, we had 37 calls for service in the month of December.
Um I'd say that's the the second highest amount of calls per uh at the hospital in that month.
Only March was uh was more.
And obviously the casino, uh, we saw the spike in kind of June, July when it started opening up again, and it's fairly consistent around a dozen times we get called there uh a month.
Um, you know, I think you can just see it, and I'm sure my friend Paul can can attest to it.
Um just the amount of mental health late last night, for instance, when we uh the the shift change around six o'clock, they literally had four domestics on the go at the same time.
Um and you know what, people are at wits end, they got financial woes because of uh work, because of uh all the restrictions and what have you.
And I think people are just at uh at each other and at what's end, and we're starting to see more and more of that spill over into our line of work, unfortunately.
But you know, it's pretty tough to navigate through four at once when you've got seven members working and you need two people at a call uh minimum for domestic.
So it uh it puts us in a pretty precarious spot.
Um, and I don't see it getting any better.
Um, as far as resources, uh, you know, we've been very fortunate actually in in a similar to I think Saanich PD, where um we haven't seen a giant increase all at once with uh members and staff being off with COVID.
It's kind of been a trickle effect.
I think some of the other police departments, uh, I think even Victoria and Winnipeg and a few others there, they got hit real hard real quick.
And so we've been pretty fortunate.
We've been pretty diligent as well with all our our measures.
But I think it can strike uh, you know, obviously it can strike anywhere, anytime.
So we are prepared for that.
Um, we're keeping our plain closed units intact, but they're ready to uh to jump onto the front lines if all of a sudden we lose a watch because um I mean we even though you do your best with the watches, they do work in close proximity, and there's only so much you can do in our line of work to try to keep the social distancing.
Um, and so, anyways, if if we all go down, we do have contingency plans in place.
As far as the um, you know, the recent events with protesters.
Um, obviously, I think many of us, including myself, are getting a little tiresome of uh some of the protesters holding the rest of the community a hostage.
And um, you know, to that end, I just want to assure council that you know we were prepared.
We had uh members on every ramp yesterday, we had uh the TAC troop down here, we had our ORT team, which is our obstacle response team.
So those when you see people tying themselves and chaining themselves and all that, we have members there that are trained to actually uh deal with those individuals safely.
But uh we will practice uh zero tolerance for for that type of social disorder.
Um, you know, we're all about uh somebody's right to protest and free speech, but you do it peacefully and uh respectfully and and you don't handcuff the rest of uh society so that they lose, especially right now when when people are obviously um already hard enough up for work and what have you, they don't need to miss any more work because of this.
So, anyways, I just want you to have confidence that uh we will address it uh swiftly if it should come into our area.
Um you know, just going around some of the uh the different areas here, Langford, December's December uh 21st, and I think this one hit the paper quite a bit.
There was some individuals going around shooting pellet guns and hitting people.
Uh one individual almost you know came close to their eye.
They had to get it um taken out at the emergency.
So they were probably one inch away from losing their eye.
Um that investigation is still ongoing.
I know we're reviewing some um some video, I believe, and uh looking for other leads here to try to identify these individuals that were and it wasn't just a one-off.
I know they uh they continued into other jurisdictions and did the same thing as well.
Yeah.
Um our traffic sections uh fully operational, so there's four members there working uh during the month.
They gave uh 17 violation tickets in in uh Langford and 14 warnings in Callwood they gave two violation and 21 warnings in View Royal they gave two violation tickets and 12 warnings uh in the month of uh December um view Royal uh in particular we had a complaint on December 4th complainant uh called a report of a crypto fraud we're starting to see more of this uh the complainant met a girl on Facebook uh dating said you scammed him into investing uh $50,000 uh of money into uh a fake cryptocurrency.
So we'll those are incredibly tough to investigate, and uh there's likely not a whole lot that we'll be able to do to assist this individual other than uh public education.
Um December 7th, we had a staff member uh of the surgical center on Helmcken uh called to report a disruptive patient who was scheduled for surgery on his wrists, but then got into an argument with the surgeon prior to, and he was kicked out of the hospital and didn't get his surgery done.
Uh I haven't had I've never seen that one before, to be honest.
Uh something new.
Um December 13th, we called received about a disturbance and a possible threat with a knife.
Uh the police were able to locate three individuals under the island highway overpass uh on the ramp high women on the south, and all parties were separated.
The argument uh was settled and uh without criminality.
Um December 21st, we had a unattended mail on the front porch of the View Row resident caught uh the attention of one specific thief during the early uh morning.
And when a bold attempt uh to steal the package was caught on the homeowner's camera surveillance, that video footage, which was excellent footage, was uh forwarded, and the suspect was identified and arrested as a result.
Other than that, that's uh I don't have a whole lot more to report here right now.
Okay, good questions.
Thank you.
Thank you, Todd.
I'm just curious on the in the highway encampment that we have, which Paul's gonna report that they had a fire there that they had to attend to.
Do you get many calls to do with that in general, or do you feel that there's it just seems and and I'm just curious about the link between the amount of petty crime that seems to be happening in the town, and there seems to be a lot of it of bicycles being stolen and garden hoses being stolen and that sort of thing, and and whether there's a link between that potentially and that long time encampment.
I'd be shocked if there wasn't, you know, when I you when you see a lot of uh, you know, the homeless individuals that uh their encampments and you see the carts, the shopping carts full of exactly that the garden hoses, uh, the garden rooms, uh, the you know, just uh the odd odd items, you have to assume they came from somewhere.
And uh yeah, oftentimes we you know it's it's tough to pin it to to where because oftentimes it doesn't get reported.
Somebody gets their garden hose stolen, they they don't bother, you know, don't even bother calling the police.
But uh, you know, we do our best to try to get these these individuals to resources to you know the shelters or mental health uh you know or what have you.
But uh we've definitely seen a ripple effect from from downtown where they're overrun, and and we we continue to see more and more of it out here.
Yeah.
The the other thing I was curious about was during that cold weather snap.
Did we run into any issues with the lack of anywhere on the West Shore for you to be able to take people?
I I think we took uh a couple individuals to the shelters downtown there.
Yeah, I think so.
Thank you.
I'm pretty sure we did.
But uh it wasn't an overwhelming problem, no.
Right.
Okay.
Okay, good.
Yeah, uh, thanks.
Uh in terms of the uh the thefts that we um we spoke of, um uh we saw a lot in Lua mainland uh theft of catalytic converters.
Is that an issue here in in the West Shore in Victoria?
Yeah, we uh from time to time you'll see a spike in that.
So we have seen that.
And and I think uh our property crime actually arrested an individual earlier this year for that.
Um so yeah, it all depends on who's out on conditions at the time.
Right, indeed.
Um again, still a shocking numbers um of individuals that are at the hospital and and um that you have to um uh be there for and look after, I guess for lack of better term, supervise.
Um and and Mayor Squeeze, maybe you can help me with this, but uh a number of mayors this morning were on CBC and they were talking about uh specific housing, uh the need for uh specialized housing for um addicts and and um um mental health uh cases and so forth.
And I think calling on the province to uh go beyond the talk and start getting some action plans on on that.
We would that would certainly benefit.
It yeah, that must have I think that's the urban mayor's caucus, which it may helps is part of, and they're really pushing for far more highly supportive housing.
Yes, yes, indeed.
Yeah, yeah.
Yeah, we mean from a policing perspective, a complex care facility.
Yeah.
Yeah, that's it.
That's you know, um, mental health hospitals, that's that's what we we need to be able to take these individuals where they can get their specific needs looked at, not put not drop them off at a house because they or a you know a subsidized house or what have you.
That that really doesn't uh I'm sure that helps to a degree, obviously, but it certainly doesn't help the uh the long term problem of of remedying their their mental health condition.
Certainly if um uh if mayor helps and and those folks um if there needs to be a a letter from the municipalities as if you will and and in support and be part of that team to uh spur this on and get it going, because it has such a huge resource issue for for uh our RCP staff.
As well as they uh for the for the uh for the good of the uh the individuals themselves.
Yeah, agreed.
Yeah, maybe we can see um what the appropriate wording and and uh how we could help that along.
Sure.
Okay, yeah, great.
Thanks.
Okay.
Yeah, thank you.
Uh Superintendent Preston, uh I know it's a challenging time right now for some of your employees during COVID.
Uh we here at council, you know, we know how challenging it must be uh in the office.
Uh what kind of safety measures and uh work from home plans have you implemented to help your employees make them feel comfortable?
Yeah, we've uh we've actually accommodated as many municipal staff as we can.
The issue is obviously with frontline policing, it's as you know, very difficult you can't really police that from home.
We have done it so that we've staggered some of the shifts upstairs as well.
We stagger the building we um you know we've done all the things you can think of in terms of the the building itself.
And then we've got some pretty strict guidelines.
Uh the RCP's come out with nationally and and with an e division just to make sure that you know you're following all the proper health guidelines and you got all the proper PE, PPE and and all that's uh that sort of thing.
The reality is is that you know we believe that we'll likely all probably um get this thing at some point.
Um so it's just a matter of trying to make it so that it's manageable so that we don't end up like Winnipeg Police Service, uh, which was pretty tough spot there.
Thank you.
And lastly, I just wanted to compliment the external communication strategy that uh has been implemented since I know uh Constable Sagers on uh leave, but it seems like uh whoever picked up uh her spot uh has been doing a great job.
I see lots of positive stories, uh uh events and uh updates that uh probably will support and affirm the support of our public uh here on the West Shore.
So uh I just wanted to pass along that compliment.
Is there any uh you know, while I got you here, is there anything that uh any concerns that uh need to be addressed that uh obvious concerns?
Thanks, Councillor.
I appreciate that a lot.
Not I don't think so.
I don't think so.
Okay, I apologize in advance if my comments in the Times columnists this morning lead lead to every off ramp and view rock being blockaded tomorrow morning.
But no idea.
They will be picketing the highways there.
Yeah, that's right.
Okay, well, thank you very much.
Just I'd I've just I've just one question, Sherman Superintendent.
When when you attend up to four domestics in a day, is there is there a safe house transition house um resource in on the West Shore or is is is there one in the region and that's downtown.
I I believe I thought it was actually in Saanicho in the West Shore that you not that I know of uh no I I don't know that offhand but I thought there was one in Saanich that you ever used.
Yeah I think so.
Okay okay and um I I this might have been in November but I think it was December and I was the first first car heading onto the um the overpass on Helmkin as a young woman stepped over and and uh it seemed she was going to jump and it was some you know I it it it it's I I made a beeline out of there um and it there was some real skill some real skill to turn you know such a worrying um harrowing um incident into you know well you know what I think um you know to give the right uh kudos I I actually think that was a Vic PDF that was the Vic PD yeah but yeah I made sure I I I brought her down to the R asked her to come down and see me and uh I thanked her in person and made sure I gave her an RCP sweaty uh sweatshirt.
I tried to recruit her while I was there too but uh how'd that work?
Uh all joking aside I I wanted to make sure that she uh she she actually doesn't have any, like she's not a crisis negotiator, she's just a really good human being and and in a phenomenal job.
So kudos to Vic PD on that.
Okay, great.
Good.
Thank you for coming.
Thank you.
Have a great day.
See ya.
It's and on that, it's interesting on both cooling centers and warming centers, right?
I mean, it's it's getting close to the when you think the population now with Langford Culwood and View Royal is approaching 70, 75,000.
It's sort of getting surprised.
If it wasn't inexcusable for before, it's becoming even more inexcusable.
We have no facility like that.
I should think in our community.
So it's something we really have to think about how we address.
But hadn't we thought about the rec center for that?
Well, we we were going to get together with the different municipalities just when COVID hit and have a meeting about how we could do it.
And it just kind of I don't but but the Rec Center is potentially, but there's still a lot of co costs involved there and staffing necessary.
So take a lot of thinking through.
Yeah.
Could talk to our director.
Chief Chief Hurst, welcome.
Good afternoon.
Happy New Year.
I hope you all had a wonderful holiday season.
Um your public safety report for November and December of 2021.
Um just two fires and out in November and early December.
The one that the mayor mentioned, uh the fire over in the 1700 block, Trans Canada.
That's a homeless encampment across from Adams Storage.
Quite a large trying to think of the right word here.
Quite an encampment of a house made of pallets and boards and whatnot.
It's the second time that that area is burned out.
There was no one in the structure at the time, and the the person didn't come back.
Left one resident over there, gentleman that's known to us.
He's been there for several years.
Now he's subsequently, as I understand, uh he's under uh medical care now in the hospital, being managed, which is good.
We uh we worked with VHA to and the RCMP to get him the help he needed.
He's one of those, he's one of those people that kind of fell through the cracks.
He's not a drug addict.
He doesn't uh he's not that he's not in that uh world.
He just has he has mental health issues and he needs help.
So we got him the help he needed, and as far as I know, he's still under care and he hasn't moved back onto that property.
He doesn't have any intention.
Um, we had a plan in place for early December to have that whole area cleared out, and then highway one, three, five, ninety-nine, ninety-seven, and twelve washed out.
And and the malahat.
And anybody who is involved in cleaning out that has been working on the other.
But we do have a commitment for January to get that area cleaned out and the trees cut up and opened up.
Very similar to the McKenzie, um McKenzie Pat Bay area where they clean that out where you can see right through.
So there's nowhere to camp nowhere to hide.
So hopefully by January we'll have that uh cleaned up.
Um move on to bylaw.
Um two projects that uh Jim's working on.
One, uh shipping containers.
There's just a proliferation of them around the community.
They show up in driveways and then they don't disappear.
I think what's happened is people are converting probably garage space into living space, and then they have no room, so they're putting shipping containers.
So Jim's been working to get rid of those, the ones are you know, the obvious ones in the front yards that are that uh yeah I think there's probably one that was close to you um and the second formerly close to you yes that's right and Jim's been working on the uh public spaces uh bylaw getting um fees and charges and all those straightened out that'll be coming forward probably in February with some changes you'll notice uh Jim also created a zone map just to give council a bit of a perspective on where sort of our bylaw complaints uh are situated just by a couple of different small precincts um there's no rhyme or reason, but it just gives you sort of a picture of View Royal and and uh where our busier areas are and where it's a little quieter in um in the town with respect to bylaw.
When I look at the annual stats for the year down a bit from last year, but I see the the majority of that is um parking tickets.
It seems the initiative that was going on with Mr.
Grew before Jim got here has resulted in a bit of an education and people are people I think are starting to learn that they can't park uninsured vehicles on the road and abandoned vehicles and and whatnot.
So uh Jim's been working pretty hard to get those areas cleaned up I think that's going actually quite well.
Um just to echo uh the superintendent's um comments on COVID.
It was quite a year.
21 was, I think, I I yeah, it was I probably the worst year of my life.
I think everybody, just a terrible year for everybody, 21.
And I'm hopeful that 22 will turn the corner.
I'm really proud of the department.
So far, we have had touch wood.
We've had no cases of COVID within the ranks of the department.
We've had some people off with colds and flu.
Everyone's been tested.
Um, and if they're not feeling well, they're not coming in.
So we're we're still managing to keep our head above water.
Um, but I am fully aware that probably within the next three to six weeks, most, if not all members and British Columbians will end up with some form of COVID or some form of cold.
That said, uh, and again to echo Todd, we do have plans in place internally.
We have plans in place with Calwood and Langford, how we're going to manage emergencies.
Um we are following the public health orders to the to the letter of the law.
Um masks in the building.
The building is again locked down, people working individually in their offices, no intermingling of shifts, day shift out the back door, night shift in the front door, no guests in the building.
Um, and it that strategy seems to be working.
I I'm really pleased.
Uh, I'm also pleased that our entire department is vaccinated, double vaccinated, and I believe most have their booster shots.
So we've had buy-in, everybody's working towards uh, you know, not only keeping themselves safe, but the residents and the people they serve, which is great.
Um, obviously, 21 tough year passing to John out in Callwood, the fire chief out there.
That was last week.
Um and I understand they have named new fire chief in the city of Callwood.
So they do have a new chief with a start date of January 17th.
It was an internal uh hiring.
They promoted from within, which is exciting.
Um you'll see Christmas, I think, was probably the busiest Christmas we've had on record uh in View Royal.
Um the you know, you read about the opiate overdose crisis uh in the paper, but it is again, as I say, every month it's alive and well with several deaths over the Christmas holidays uh due to opiates, several suicides this year, Christmas Eve, Christmas Day suicides uh that the crews had to attend to.
And it's not unlike really any other time of the year.
It's just it's a little it's a little more stressful when it's it's Christmas Eve or it's Christmas Day, and our hearts go out to those families for for whatever issues those people were suffering from.
So it's it's not easy any time of the year, but Christmas is an exceptionally difficult time of year.
Several fires in View Royal and Calwood and Langford on Christmas Day, Boxing Day, Christmas Eve.
It just seemed to be a busier year this year than normal.
Um, the association had a great year, uh, their annual food drive.
The the residents of View Royal were extremely generous.
Uh they collected $7,000 from residents and thousands of pounds of food for the food bank, which was uh, I think that was a record year for them this year.
Um, and again, just to uh to touch base uh with COVID, um, you know, we're hopeful the next six, five, six, eight weeks we can get through this and we'll see a surge and a spike and hopefully we'll come out the other end okay.
I know other departments are starting to suffer pretty extensively um in the region, and we're still managing to keep our head above water, but we do have plans in place to uh maintain fire protection.
So if we don't, you'll be the first to know, along with the CAO, what our plan is moving forward.
Uh with that.
Questions?
Questions.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's counselor.
Thanks, Paul.
Um, happy new year and thank you.
And um uh yeah, interesting how Christmas uh could be uh such a busy time indeed.
Yeah.
Um and I'm I'm impressed with um uh the staff and and what they've been able to achieve um and uh their commitment to stay as safe as possible with with the COVID.
You know, COVID plus flu can happen and and um you know it's um it you know it's uh almost a touch and go.
Yeah.
So have you um also worked and coordinated with the other fire departments, Colwood and Langford, if um any one start municipality starts getting hit with um you know a shortage of staff?
Absolutely.
So uh about I guess January 1st Colwood moved to um the same model that we have in V-Royal with four people in the station at night.
So minimum staff in the day, four people overnight, where they're not calling in people into the building.
It's just those four people in a single engine response.
If they need help, they're calling from Langford and Vie Royal.
Uh Langford's been there for years, and we're into about our second or third year of staffed at night.
So we we will only call in people in an absolute dire emergency.
So we're relying on Callwood and Langford, just trying to keep the exposure down to a minimum.
Now, if we get into a situation where we do run out of staff or we have no staff, then we can rely on Callwood and Langford under our mutual aid plans.
And and those will be very quick discussions where if you know one department's sick and one department's healthy, then we can we can help them out with staffing and and just cover off the emergencies.
We'll also have to we'll also have to prioritize calls.
You know, if you have a hurt toe, we're not coming.
I I said the other day it's the two H's, house fires and heart attacks.
If it's not life and death, then we might have to prioritize the calls we go to just to limit our exposure.
We don't need to be leaving the station unnecessarily at this time.
On that, um again, we hear from Vancouver um uh the lack of uh yeah, I not the lack of, but the difficulty um and and delays of ambulance attendance.
Um getting a sense that Victoria's suffering the same challenges?
I'm that that is one concern that we have.
Um, the you know, in my opinion, just based on some of the issues we've had um with the hospital and overcrowding, full emergency departments, ambulances backed up in the parking lot, that all trickles down.
Um, and when you end up overwhelming this, you know, the hospital system and the emergency system, it backs up into the first responder and we end up uh waiting longer.
Now, those calls, uh, as I understand it, a lot of the lower acuity calls are the ones where crews are waiting a long time for an ambulance, and that's where I have the ability to siphon out those lower acuity calls and not go to them.
Um higher acuity life and death calls, we'll get an ambulance right away, and that person will be transported.
But uh unfortunately, the lower acuity, the the sick person, the slip and fall, um, you know, the broken arm, we can't afford to sit on a patient for two or three hours.
I mean, there are there are departments in the mainland that are sitting on patients for 10, 15, 20 hours, and they're switching crews out waiting for an ambulance.
We haven't seen that here in Victoria yet.
We're we're very fortunate.
But I fully anticipate uh that in the next couple of weeks we're the ambulance service is going to have a real challenge.
Um they're having difficulty right now answering 911 telephone calls.
I can't imagine when Omicron winds up.
Uh it's gonna affect the crews on the road, and then I think we're gonna be uh we're gonna be in trouble.
Yeah.
Okay.
Well, certainly uh I I know we want to stay on on top of this and and uh yeah.
I mean, obviously, counselor, we're gonna support BC ambulances as best we can with everything we can as as partners, but we're gonna have to focus on fire protection as well.
Right.
With with uh the COVID um and uh the ex um kind of measures and um that you have to put in place, how is that uh impacting the the uh staff training?
You know, you there's so much training that has to be done and and what's the impact of that?
So night shifts, every night shift does two hours of training a night.
Okay.
On shift.
We've we postponed again our large departmental earls.
We did one a month.
Um now it's we've we've postponed those again to keep everyone out of the building, but every every night shift crew has to drill uh for two hours a night.
So we're still maintaining our training.
Uh there's still lots of online opportunities and and looking at the training report from Heath, things are still happening, people are still adapting and moving through it.
So we're we're keeping up there.
Um, and then I'm hopeful once the spring comes along, we'll be able to transition back to some sort of normalcy.
Okay.
Yeah, another question.
In in um your statistics, um the alarm bells, and you know, there's always something happening, alarm bells.
Are those repeat offenders?
And um, I remember we had talked about uh trying to bring some uh some attention to uh address the nuisance calls.
Are we okay on on those nuisance aspects?
Yeah, believe it or not, those so under the bylaw, you get your first false alarm free.
Your second one is 150, and then your second or third call is $500 fines.
We find quite quickly, once they're informed of the fining mechanism, most of these are first-time offenders.
Okay.
Anyone that's over, they they are issued a coupon that is redeemable at the front counter at the town hall for payment.
And it usually corrects and solves the problem pretty quickly.
And I noticed some of your statistics.
Um 2021 was the third busiest year in the last 10 years.
Yeah, it it it it died off there with the COVID, of course, and that was a lot of medical.
I think the number of note, and I and I just sent this off to uh to Chief Aubrey in uh in Langford, um mutual aid and automatic aid runs.
We did a hundred a hundred fire call runs out to Calwood and Langford Um for the year.
So you know, seven to ten, seven to ten a month.
So the calls that we're having in Vie Royal they're they're coming.
Yeah.
Um and that's being reciprocated.
But that that's sort of part of the program right now.
I think because we're only running four people in each station, we don't have the luxury of having 30 volunteers show up, so I have to call them and they have to call us.
But it's working.
It's uh the people are in the building, it's not like we're taxing the volunteers and pulling them in from home.
So it's actually working quite well right now.
Thank you.
Thank you, counselor.
Anyone else?
Sure.
Thank you.
Um congrats on the highways encampment.
I think that's really good news if that gets cleared out and help on that.
Yeah.
Congrats also on the the food drive.
I smiled when I saw the various Santa pictures and thought that nobody could accuse V Royal of not being a diverse community.
We are a diverse department.
We are absolutely and um on a more serious note, I've had a couple of people from opposite ends of town complaining to me about people living in cars.
Are you getting more of those calls?
Or you know, I I'll check with Jim.
The the RV issue is still you drive around V Royal, you'll still find a couple of them.
And they they know within about you know, at the 71 71st hour, they start the vehicle and they drive somewhere else and park for another 71 hours before Jim knocks on the door.
Haven't noticed much in cars.
I'll ask Jim to see what the Yeah, it'd be good just to get some feedback on that.
Yeah I think it I think it's I think it's tough all over.
It's it's terrible.
You know that's good for us.
There's an affordable home in V Royal.
I think last week there were three homes for sale in V Royal and that's it.
That was our typical home all over a million dollars now.
Yeah um Chief could walk walk me talk me through shipping containers.
What is what does compliance look like if if someone is planning to move for example and they put everything in to a container in their driveway.
Yep.
Presumably for the short term.
Is there's a um a permit need to no you can you can have it dropped off, delivered, you fill it with your stuff and then it's hauled away.
You we expect usually a week or two and it's gone.
Okay.
You you'll get our attention when you drive by and you see it's there for a couple of months.
For months and months.
Or uh usually, or it'll be a neighbor will phone and say, hey, there's been a shipping container in this guy's front yard for the last six months.
Right.
Uh we don't generally go looking for it, um, but it became an issue.
I was driving into work one morning and it would just seem there it is still.
Yep.
So they were all given everyone in V oil who had a shipping container was given 90 days to get rid of it.
So we're probably into probably our second month.
And Jim has made contact with every single one.
So they will all be going.
Right.
So in the case where a shipping container is in front of or in the driveway of a rental yep you would obviously contact the owner of the property.
So okay if I may how long you know are shipping containers they're just legal you can't have them or is there a period of time we can have them for 30 days.
Under the bylaw you can't have them they're they're considered a temporary structure you can't have them so we're we're allowing MoBox to drop off you know and we expect somebody's gonna have them 15, 20 maybe a month yeah that they load and unload.
Yeah but I think what's happening now is you know all of a sudden now there's tents over top and there's lumber stored on top and they they become a fixture.
And people live in low they may be a residence, yeah.
Absolutely.
Yeah.
When you see power running into a shipping container, you're going to hear a trouble.
That's a clue.
That's a clue.
Yeah.
Yeah.
All right.
That's great.
Okay.
Thank you one other question Paul, are you're sticking around for budget?
When is it?
Oh, they sorry, the um next next item is is the um you know the 2021 budget overview.
And do you have a specific question for me?
May I ask questions on uh for Paul?
In Paul, in can I stop you?
I can send him an email.
But Paul, some of the in in the um uh in the fire department, there were a number of non-core um capital items in 2021 that um we still had 100% to spend.
Any insight?
Yeah.
Um I hate to use it's kind of like using words like pivot and transition, but the word is supply chain.
Yeah.
Most of the stuff that we ordered in our budget was August, September.
Okay.
And it just it might have been on the Zim Cluster burning out in front of Victoria.
Like we we talk with distributors because we want to clear these numbers off the books.
That's what we're getting.
We don't want to carry over.
We're getting is is yep.
And it's somewhere in Wisconsin and it's it'll get here in March.
So that's our challenge.
We can't we we've ordered it, we can't get it.
Okay.
Yeah.
And thank you for the graphical um on the bylaw too.
Oh yeah, I I thought you'd enjoy that, John.
It's because we got too many counselors and do you know how busy it is in the uh harbor course?
Because we got so many counselors.
So do we have a motion?
I'll move receipt of A and B.
Second.
Second.
Did I hear second?
Yeah, John.
John, okay.
All those in favor, none opposed.
Okay.
Thank you.
Thank you very much.
Thanks.
Well, have a great day.
And we go to finance and admin.
And the very first report up is the staff report budget variants.
Um, Don, did you want to speak to this at all, or is it just here for questions if we have any?
Uh yes, your worship.
It's just there for questions.
Certainly.
I can um be happy to do the best I can at answering your questions.
Okay, thank you.
Any questions for Don?
Yeah.
Councillor Rogers?
Yeah, thanks.
Uh Don, a similar question to what I asked uh Chief First.
You know, I I say that non-core, you know, we had budget budgeted of 155,000 and um 165 was spent in the capital we budgeted 2.6 and 747 uh thousand was spent.
Is this a uh like Paul saying, a um a supply chain problem or other or just simply uh deferrals because of uh staffing and saving money?
Yeah, uh you know, certainly um the fire chief's response was valid for for some of those items um that you may be referring to, and certainly uh for some of the items that concern uh you know his his department.
I might say that for the non-core projects, there is a little bit of a difference for some of the items, and that is where the non-core project, if you will, was actually less of a project and more of a change in our structure.
For example, the fire services volunteer staffing restructure.
We don't track that as a project.
And so it was very difficult to report it on here, but we do include it because that was a budgeted non-core item.
So that's why it's showing as zero spent against a budget.
But indeed, the project has been completed in that the restructure has happened.
We just don't have costs to show you pertaining specifically to that item.
So that's one difference from what the fire chief said.
The other one was, of course, where a project did not proceed because the funding wasn't approved.
The grant wasn't approved.
So in that case, we still list the project because it was a valid project, and likely we will either reapply next year, so you're gonna see it again.
But in this case, of course, the project did not proceed, so we have zero spending against that project.
So those are some other reasons for different types of reasons why you might see a budget with net with um a hundred percent of the budget still available.
Thank you.
Anybody else?
No, I just need a motion to receive.
All in favor, opposed, that's carried.
So moved.
Okay, moved by councillor Rogers, seconded by Councillor Lemmon.
Thank you, Don.
And next we have the action list, the fourth quarter update.
Um again, it's really just here for information for us.
And um John?
Yeah, I do have a question on the uh the first one, page one.
Um, and it was um uh in this assessing the intersection of Helmcken and Watkins Way.
And um it was good comments there, very worthwhile.
And and I see there was an approximate um eight thousand dollars to review the intersection.
Um I just wondered uh does council need to help in in approving that those funds and and get this assessment going.
I don't think so but Director Rosenberg can speak to it.
Thank you worship no um we we can contain that especially now it's it was it would be within the 2022 budget we uh council assuming things don't change from previous years uh engineering has an allotment for consultants throughout the year um we use those particular funds this year uh to look at the shoreline and island highway um intersection, which should be coming to council sometime this spring, and the Jedberg and Helmkin intersection as well.
So this is one of those ones where we're kind of sitting on it right now because we um we've been approached by Eagle's nest, the development in the corner, Burnside and Helmkin.
Um and part of their process will be to look at that intersection.
And if we don't have to spend those funds, we won't.
But if they end up not moving forward, then we'll use the funds and uh take a look at the intersection.
Okay.
anybody else?
No, I I was I was wondering about three Helmkin, but it just got answered.
So thank you.
Good.
Thank you, John.
I just need a motion to receive to move.
Okay, moved by Councillor Rogers, seconded by Councillor Lemmon.
All in favor, opposed, that's carried.
And we, I guess, just before we carry on, given that we're going very well here, is there any reason why we couldn't do the tree bylaw this afternoon before dinner break?
I mean, I know that maybe we shouldn't move a recommendation, but we could go through it with staff, then see if there's any public participation on it.
Um, and then I'm just thinking in the interest of time, because clearly we're going to be done here in 20 minutes.
John, are you fine with that?
Yeah, I can make that work.
Okay, thank you.
I'm fine with that.
Okay.
And the web producers can have that ready.
Can can I suggest we determine if councillor Matzon can be available or on the line?
I know he was.
Well, I'm not not saying that we're not we're we're not going to adopt it before, but he's still gonna have the opportunity for I I can text him and tell him, but I I think my general answer would be if you don't tell us you're not coming, um that you snooze you lose.
So I can certainly text him and tell him we're gonna be covering that.
Um good.
He he's trying to download teams to the biomes five.
Not something you can do with so put it on to himself.
Is that he's working on that now?
Yeah, so we're moving to the strategic plan update.
Sarah, did you want to talk to that?
Or again, is it just here for it?
It's available for questions.
Uh it's there for information at this point.
Okay, do we have any questions?
Just uh a couple of comments.
Sure, go ahead.
Uh you find my way here.
Uh darn it, just a sec.
There you go.
Go ahead.
Yeah, I'm just texting counselor maybe sure.
Um, I just wanted to comment on um, and this is our page seven, and it was the uh BC Transit uh higher level of uh transit service.
And um, you know, I'm I'm certainly pleased that uh transit has is supplying or providing service uh improvements at the East Lake.
Um, um but we're I would suggest that we're not done yet because the the hours of frequency is is still um what once an hour, you know, really quite pathetic, uh and certainly not um um of a frequency that would um um satisfy users during the the busy summer season.
So um you know anything that we can do to encourage uh transit to make sure the number 53 is on a more frequent basis, um I think that's that would be quite necessary.
And also for the for the neighborhood um having reliable service and and perhaps when when we do have the roundabout uh put in, um which I knew is an important aspect for for transit, um, we might uh might get that.
So that was one comment, your worship.
Um if Councillor Lemmon?
Yeah.
Um, um I have a question about the um heat pump conversion grant.
Uh does anyone know the uptake?
I do not I do not um know um the answer to that question, uh Councillor Lemon, but I can look into that.
And uh they they are supposed to report back to us periodically.
Um I'm not sure if that reporting period has closed yet or if it ran until let's say you know October to the end of January.
So it should be soon.
Um but once we get that, we'll let you know what those numbers are.
That would be exciting to know.
Yeah, great.
Thank you.
I think on the the transit, we may want to lobby our representative on the transit commission, which of course is Mayor Martin.
I know I got a few more things.
And that would be easy enough to do.
I see that's going to be uh probably discussed in the financial plan, but um I was pretty shocked to see it's a hundred thousand dollar price tag uh when we were considering uh doing a couple of pilot signages items uh for portage and and uh the oil part for five thousand.
So it's um, you know, that's that's a heck of a hit, and and I guess we'll have those discussions when it comes to budget.
Um I also note that um you know Safro actively working on the step code uh three and two and so forth.
Um, you know, it it's rather interesting because um and I'm I'm hopeful that we'll when the climate action strategy um uh uh document comes from the uh consultants and uh given council's uh support for a really um proactive um reduction of GHTs, um, that we will may we may see and and hopefully we'll see a um an acceleration to of step code to make sure that we're going to be meeting our greenhouse gas targets.
So that's um that was on page 12.
Um and let's see, I I see that there's a couple of um items where it didn't have any status.
Uh, for example, on page 13, uh, collect uh local inventory of oil, natural gas, propane residential users, and and that was supposed to have been done in 2021 as an in-house project, but there's been no comment on that.
Which one is that?
Uh that's on uh page 12, and where um staff were again based on on the GHCs and carbons um uh suppose related to the heat pump, uh collecting a local inventory of um which homes have oil, natural gas, propane could be candidates for um heat pump conversion, and that was an in-house uh initiative for 2021 last year.
I remember seeing a report of some sort back on the Director Chase.
Thank you, your worship.
That unfortunately is something we can only provide an estimate on.
And we have provided that estimate courtesy of the Capital Regional District.
It was estimated that there's somewhere between 60 and 90 residences based on overall fuel usage.
We don't know how accurate that number is.
We have no way of requiring utility companies or oil delivery companies to provide their client lists, which is really the only way we have to verify that.
We do not track oil train oil tanks in any way um in the town nor have we ever done so unlike other municipalities where there have been uh a requirement for permits for oil tanks historically so they have a great deal of historic data courtesy of um the fire department I'm thinking sanawch in particular uh we just don't have that level of of data available to us it's not data we own and it's not data that we can readily access.
If I can speak coming uh yeah I appreciate that um you know before 1988 um when RUA was under the guise of the CRD um it would have been pretty difficult to know where the oil tanks are.
And maybe the fire department has it, maybe the CRD has it, but that would probably be all on paper.
You know, I guess this isn't just an issue for um the um you know, for heat pump conversion, and but it's also an issue when you have an oil tank leakage somewhere and you've got to determine uh where the you know as it ends up in in some outfall um storm water uh where that um the oil is coming from, the oil tank leakage.
And how how would we uh be able to um track that down if we don't know uh and have it's like you would think that we'd we'd be able to have that kind of record or should have it, even if the after the town was incorporated in 1988.
That is not data we have we have ever collected.
There is no permit for an oil tank in the town.
So I'm not sure where that data would come from.
I do note though that it is the property owner's responsibility, and the Ministry of Environment is quite uh quite clever at following up on uh leaks, etc.
Uh, and they they would certainly be um interested in that, and I'm sure that we could count on their support to address that type of issue should it should it occur in View Royal.
I think the horror shows that we've read about in Sanage, you know, the gorge, for example.
I mean, they haven't had a clue where those originated, right?
It's taking quite a process to trace the oil back and discover which home was in fact responsible for it.
I don't think we're unique in not necessarily knowing exactly which homes have oil tanks.
Yeah, I don't know.
And and I I I I made a question to staff.
Yeah.
Staff, do any do we know of any homes at this point?
Um do still have um oil tanks on on new installs.
We wouldn't know if there's a heating source like this year.
I'd be very surprised.
I know.
I'm not aware of any this year.
Um, the vast majority of new new homes that are being constructed are either putting in a heat pump uh because it is the most efficient way of heating a home and it provides the option of cooling in the summer months, or it's baseboard electric.
And those are those are the two primary sources of heat and or cooling in homes in homes today.
Natural gas.
As long as it meets the code, we are able to approve it yeah so i guess we're should um on on this particular matter if we've staff have done best efforts then we we can just call it complete yeah i suppose that's true i know that a report or some notation did come back to us at some point last year and just as a housekeeping yeah you know yeah I think it came from CRD I think there were some CRD figures.
Yeah the information did come from the CRD yes they they share they shared their estimates with us um with um significant qualifications as to the the the uh plus or minus um uh that that may be associated with any numbers.
Right.
So so perhaps staff would want to just close that one complete with uh the noting your CRD's estimates.
Sure, we can certainly do that.
Thank you, Councillor Rogers.
Okay.
That's about all I have your worship.
Yeah.
Any other questions, comments on the strategic plan update?
No, okay, nope.
Go ahead.
What this this is you know perhaps um not entirely relevant, but in a meeting yesterday there was a suggestion that we have a um kind of public um a way for the public to see how Bureau was doing with its GHGs.
One thought was one thought was perhaps I could have barometer like the United Way used to do and have that at the at at the fire hall.
Um someone else suggested an app, which might be less public.
But anyway, it's something that I think that we might want to discuss and consider as a community that's you know striving to be private neutral.
So presumably that may fall out of the climate action plan when we get there.
Perhaps.
Director Chase.
Thank you, your worship I'm I'm curious to understand if there if if uh that meeting was discussing corporate emissions or community emissions.
I I think it was more general yes.
Okay.
Yeah.
How we're doing as a community because I I you know I I think there's an awareness where we're at corporately so but um it would be encouraging for you know the community at large to be able to see and encouraging and encourage them to you know keep doing better um as we move up on the barometer or down whatever way the ground goes we can certainly take a look to try and understand what kind of data might be um useful um to report out on and also the time frame because i don't expect that ghg numbers are likely to be released every year um our our sources of data are is generally the province, um, and they seem to be operating on about a five-year cycle or longer.
So maybe it could be a discussion point and a consideration or how how you know we can have put a public face on this.
Good, thank you.
Okay, so I just need a motion, please, to receive item C.
Okay, moved by Councillor Rogers, second seconded by Councillor Kowalewich.
All in favor, opposed.
That's carried.
Um next up we have the CAO update.
Are you gonna go through that, Sarah?
And Kim's absence.
At a rapid pace, your worship.
I just want to make an initial comment that I absolutely despise that photograph of that you put in there.
But other than that, carry on.
Well, see, you're very photogenic, I thought, actually.
So thank you.
Yeah, that's true.
But but to me, what was the most exciting news from this uh mayor and mayor and council is the the fact that two classes from View Royal Elementary of kindergarten kids walked up here on December 8th, sang two little songs to us, and they presented two handmade cards to the mayor, thanking uh View Royal for the work that has happened in making it a wonderful place to live.
And um, we we gave them candy canes, a little oranges and stickers, and it was so very sweet to see those kids once again.
And in the past, they've come in and they've had little handmade ornaments for our tree, but this year uh clearly we couldn't do that, but it was just so nice that and and the day was great weather for them to come down and to hear them and to see them.
Such cute little muffins, they're so sweet.
Um, so also happening in December, the admin department um helped council with the uh festive lights contest with 16 entries.
I think that was well received again this year, and uh, we had a long service recognition event, which we do now every December.
We marked 80 years of service combined with with these seven employees, so that was great.
We also recognized our volunteers sending out almost a hundred little cute boxes of chocolates, acknowledging the work of our volunteers.
And also a lovely display in the foyer of a 3D representation of a photo showing people skating on a squamalt harbor.
Now when the photo went in, there was no snow, and then maybe maybe next year the the winter photo will just only be sunshine and palm trees, and maybe this was just the harbinger of the snow that we've then had later in the month.
I don't know.
Um but uh there you have it.
So it's it's certainly been a busy month in admin.
In finance as well, it was an interim audit, and as anticipated, it was done 100% remotely.
Work is being done to close out 2021 financially with fiscal year end preparation of the financial statements and also work being undertaken with financial plan workshops coming up in February.
Those are already on your outlook calendars and they're listed here as well.
And a little bit of discussion and some stats on people making their payments by year end and how they're doing it electronically so showing some of the uptake there.
And for development services, we spoke a few minutes ago about the community climate action strategy.
Work continued with that.
Targets were set at the community of the committee of the whole meeting in December.
So the targets would put View Royal among one of the leading municipalities in the region with setting a hundred percent reduction level by 2050.
We have also done work in development services building into phase two or the next phase of the consultation for the OCP work.
In engineering, it was King Tides in the month of December, which saw some flooding in Centennial Park, and it was quite challenging at that time.
We also discussed last month the LED BC hydro light conversion, so it's uh certainly uh increasing uh the visibility of our sidewalks at night and our roads at night, and uh they last a bit longer, require less maintenance.
So these are good things.
A little bit of new equipment coming in there with um and and compatible with some of our existing machinery.
And we did discuss in December our great Christmas lights and and displays that we have around town.
And GIS is doing work with asset management to improve our data with our databases, and also some of the work that they're doing makes it easier for tracking when they're when staff is out in the field.
And most recently the annual drainage and head wall inspections have been conducted with the um a GIS uh product put out by ESRI um for Arc GIS, and we can collect it now on tablets, so there's a lot less double entry of the data when they're doing that work, and that is work that was done in December just to mention a few of the highlights great thank you sir any questions on the CAO report John yes please um in the um uh you gave the numbers for the sewer um payments I'm just trying to find out yeah the invoices so um 21% um were outstanding um do you know how much of a value 21% was is that was that the small uh bills or you know, because I I'm trying to think of what the the total invoice bill would be for the entire town, and 21% is uh one-fifth of our of our uh tax collection.
I will have to turn to the director of finance for the answer to that question.
Uh yes, and unfortunately I don't have the answer ready for for that question.
Don, are you available?
Um but in any case, um because sewer payments, uh sorry, sewer billings, when they are transferred at the end of the year, they're transferred to property taxes.
So collection is definitely assured.
It's it's not like um you know, these are receivables that are at risk.
They will go on to the tax bill that is sent out in June and they will be paid uh just as other taxes are.
So while I don't have that answer, I do want to assure council that sewer payments will be collected.
Thank you.
Um if I can uh then switch to engineering.
Is is this the um typical expected, or did this one break any records?
Thank you, Chair.
I'm not aware of it breaking any records, but it's certainly not our norm.
I I do know historically we've had that parking lot flood before.
So, but it's it's not a common occurrence, that's for sure.
It's uh bit like a Sumas Prairie.
Um and and does that has that created any structural problems um for any of the buildings or part perhaps no, we're pretty lucky because we're uh I'll say antiquated with regards to our infrastructure in the building there with the concession.
We don't have it's not you know um built with drywall or any of those things that would damage with water.
So it's we have tile in there that doesn't heave with the water.
Um we've got block walls, so the block walls generally already impacted, and and we really only get about two inches, three inches this last time.
So it takes a while to get up there.
So it hasn't really been an issue so far.
Um, we won't truly know till it dries out and see if there's any kind of inspect and you know uh expansion or contraction.
Because if we get a combination of some uh moisture and then some freezing, it may cause us some issues, but in the past it hasn't.
So we're hoping uh the record stays the same.
Um I don't know, your worship, um, and and staff, were there any uh concerns or complaints for the neighbors?
Uh I'm sure they also got uh impacted by the water.
You know what?
We didn't actually hear anything from the neighbors, so um basically did um how the neighborhood something like that.
I would say that um our lands are a little bit lower than those lands up in the white pine area in that you kind of have to walk the hillside to get there, and we've got a ditch that separates the two uh properties.
So I'm guessing all the stage ditch, so I I don't think so.
Um and I guess when when when we talk about uh reconstruction or you know, would they re redeveloping uh Centennial Park?
Um, is gosh, I don't know.
Um is there any way of redesigning the parking lot so the water doesn't come to the surface?
Uh is it like building a higher parking lot?
Um, I don't um uh yeah, I mean I mean, I I think part of that master plan process, uh to be honest with you, I'd be more concerned about the field aspect.
What are we gonna do with those fields and the ball diamonds and those types of things?
Um we can raise the parking lot, um, but we'd still have to do if we're going to put the water underneath that asphalt structure and not have a release point, I'd be concerned about that uplift.
Um, and for the occurrence, again, I've been here 10 years and I think this might be the second time it's happened.
It may not be the best place to spend our money at this time because it's just not causing us.
It the pavement hasn't really suffered from it uh in previous years because it's always hidden under that area.
Even when you don't see it, it's down there.
So I don't think it'd be a significant issue.
If I was going to look at drainage in Centennial Park, I would look at it more from a field performance point of view and whether we should be raising those fields up, you know, 12 to 18 inches, something like that, and putting in some kind of subdrain that pulls that water away from that field.
But it depends on what the field looks like in the future.
Maybe you know what we find out is we don't need all of those baseball diamonds and get re get rid of a diamond, or we can allocate it in a different form.
So I until we actually get through that uh master plan, it'll probably give us some answers.
So when we would do with the plan, let's think about the oh, definitely that'll be part of that process without a doubt.
Um two more comments, if I would maybe um you know the the new street lights, um uh the LED, it's it's remarkable.
The two lights on on Prince Robert has greatly illuminated uh so that everything's being reflected.
And and I'm I'm a little concerned about the the um dark skies because the amount of reflection on white buildings um is is quite surprising.
And um uh it projects didn't we discuss these last month?
Yeah, but it but I you know I it does reduce I'm not I'm I'm guess I take issue with the fact that it helps reduce light pollution because I think the the amount um of light that's um I'm I know there's a difference of energy consumption, but I think the the intensity of the lights is creating a lot more upward um reflection.
Um so are you saying that BC Hydro you can contact them and they'll assess that?
Um certainly if we told them to assess every single light, no.
Um but as an individual homeowner, if you're calling concerned about your particular light at this moment, they're willing to look at that.
I don't think they're looking at um uh a global type community effort once we go to night skies because the minute they said yes, it's a concern with our town, I can guarantee you that many, many towns across the province would be doing the same.
And BC Hydro is not about to do some kind of provincial campaign on that.
So I I I don't see them responding to that kind of global request.
I yeah, that's my concern of dark sky.
The um equipment, there's beautiful pictures.
Uh, were we able to use those uh for uh snow removal and cleaning sidewalk?
100%.
We're gonna get to that later okay.
But I just wanted to confirm that well, yeah, yeah.
That is on the agenda later.
Yeah, it is.
Let's not have that discussion now.
Well, it's good to know.
Thank you.
Anybody else?
No, okay.
Thank you, Sarah.
Thank you for the report.
Lots of good work going on.
So I am teasing a bit about the picture.
I think just when I looked at it, I thought, God, I look old.
But anyhow, that's good.
I do look like a smurf.
Yeah, maybe that's okay.
So we need a motion to receive the CAO report.
Thank you.
Moved by Councillor Rogers, seconded by Councillor Gualovich.
All in favor, opposed, that's carried.
So then we have, I'm presuming we're just looking for a motion to um approve for recommend to council the approval of the library's budget.
Is anyone coming to speak to it?
I don't think so.
They can't.
May I?
Yeah.
Certainly, if we would like to have someone come and speak to us, they would be more than more than pleased.
Um they go they got the do we need someone to come speak to it?
It it's a minimal increase.
Um there you go.
Yeah.
I guess um, you know, you know, you're right, it's a it's a minimal increase.
Um my concern is um, and I I don't know, uh Council Lemon make his peak speeches, but uh my concern is the how much of the uh contingencies um are being spent.
Um you know there was nothing that was put into reserves that I could see.
Yeah, it's uh 780,000 was taken from reserves, and um it sounds like the contingencies will last um for four years and and then they're down to fifty-six thousand, you know, pittance.
And um so I'm I am worried that um there's been no increase on capital expenses.
Um you know, the yes, the so I'm really, really worried about um the long-term uh effectiveness and and um uh planning uh for the library.
And I understand uh you know the the situation with with COVID, but um you know it was when you look at a four point seven operating percent uh increase was look four percent and it's down to two percent then it was covered for surplus that's one day they're gonna have to make up well certainly certain maybe maybe we do want um to have someone come and speak then that that's or just send that message yeah i i would lay that i'm i'm not i wasn't on i'm not on the finance committee so i wasn't deep in those discussions um but i would be happy to uh relay your concerns or we can you know have someone come yeah, the the idea of having someone come to present the budget wouldn't be to question the library board's long-term decision making, I don't think.
Right.
I think that's two very completely separate separate things.
So I mean if if there is specific concern about that, then I think that that question could certainly be sent via our representative about how our so I mean we already know the answer to that in that you know municipal councils frown on large increases, and therefore the library board is expected to keep their increases minimal, and because we've asked it before, but we can certainly send that question via our rep.
Yeah, yeah, I I I'm happy to approve the budget.
You're right.
Um I got no problem with the two percent it's um and and it looks like that's the way it is across all the way to the end for the next four years, but then bam, all of a sudden there won't be any reserves.
So yes, yeah, no, I agree.
Well, I mean, we we can certainly, you know, we we can we can make a motion to approve the budget in principle and relay our concerns at the same time about what appears to be depleted of reserves um at the end of the five year plan yeah or something to that effect and and just to draw a parallel to worship um i had the similar concerns with the west shore parks where we you know we're using up the reserves and and uh the building maintenance was under considerable threat yeah no i agree well i think the west shore parks and budget increase will um alleviate your concerns there a little bit.
So then the motion would be to approve the budget in principle before or approve the budget and but relay our concerns about depleted reserves in the long term.
Okay.
I will take those to the next meeting.
Okay.
So are you good with that?
Okay.
So that's moved by everyone's okay.
Councilor Rogers and Councillor Kowalovich.
All in favor, opposed, that's carried.
So I I mean I have tried to text Councillor Matson.
I mean, my suggestion would be to go into parks and and let John present on the tree bylaw.
We can ask questions, and then at seven o'clock, if Councillor Matson has any questions or the public has any comments, we can also we can deal with that then.
Would that kind of makes sense to everybody?
Oh, I'm getting a text message from council.
Oh it says listening and then strange loose language but um something about teams and I won't say the word before that but welcome counselor matts and I take it you're on the phone can you come too on your phone I think yeah would you maybe just call them they might have him muted he says he's gonna listen to discussion so that's okay so he's he's listening so that's good and then at seven we can so I I'll hand it over to you counselor rogers to chair the okay part on the proposed tree bylaw.
Yeah, absolutely on iPad okay perfect.
And so uh yes, uh I'll gladly hand it over to John, please.
Thank you, Councilor Rogers.
Uh I do have a very short PowerPoint presentation.
Start off with a picture of a tree.
Uh I know uh I generally don't like to do that fluffy kind of picture stuff.
I just like to get right to the business.
But Jennifer Smith, uh our one of our engineering clerks, has done an outstanding job on uh this tree bylaw, and uh she tends to think of these things to make me look a little better.
So I appreciate that.
We're bringing forward the uh bylaw to be reviewed again by uh the committee.
Um if you recall last uh May we brought it forward um with some some suggestions.
We had uh, I think uh your worship, um, you mentioned it was a very lengthy discussion um about trees and the permit.
It went on fair fair length of time, but uh staff was able to get a real feel for what council wanted to see and a revision as part of that process.
We had a legal review and the bylaw that's presented for consideration um next week with council um reflects that those comments from our legal opinion that we uh received from that.
Um what I plan to do is just go through um kind of the highlights of what we've changed.
Um when we presented the package, we also gave you the um changes of the existing bylaw to the new bylaw.
Quite confusing.
So hopefully you're focused more on what the bylaw says now as opposed to what it used to say.
And I hope that we've been able to uh incorporate all the changes you're looking for.
So next slide, please.
Uh we made all those changes.
So we really just talked about uh changing the trees, the list of the trees.
We added a couple, we removed uh uh a few, um, nothing big.
We added um birds, nests, and so on, raptors and so on within that.
Um, we removed the significant trees.
Um, we don't have a list of significant trees.
Um, any tree that's bigger than 12 inches in diameter or of a certain species would be captured within the protected bylaw.
Um, so significant trees have been removed.
Um, we did some changes to the size of the uh branches that you could prune.
Uh, we uh did some changes to emergency removal.
We increased the uh water course works so that if you're within 30 meters instead of 15, um you have to have a permit.
It used to be 15.
We've amended the penalties.
Um so your your everyday type MTI fines by um community charter can only be a thousand dollars.
So if you looked in that fees and charges and the MTI changes, we've reflected some of those changes within that on the chain on our requests.
And then we've also added the ability within the community charter under the offense act, we can go to 50,000.
Um, those types of offenses would be subject to um court matters, and and just because we pick a number, um, what staff's working on now is uh studying the best approach for the town.
Um, and it would be some kind of appraisal by uh an expert if we were to have, say, uh a significantly large tree or say a group of trees that were taken down maliciously for view purposes or something like that, we would bring in an expert.
And what we're trying to determine is what that approach would be.
There's several different ways to make that approach.
You can talk about a cost approach, an income approach, a benefit approach, i.e., the the benefit of the view, what did that cost, and what's that appraisal.
So we're trying to figure out what will best suit the purposes of the town to make sure that um one um the the infraction doesn't occur again, and two that it's um enough of a penalty to to make sure that people understand that we take trees seriously here in the removal if uh it's not sanctioned as that's good so thro through the chair so on that if if say we had someone take down a tree that was borderline but it was a protected tree if there was no massive implications would staff just decide somewhere in that range of what fine you were going to assess on sort of a day-to-day basis currently we have the ability up to a thousand dollars in the MTI bylaw.
Right.
Just to, you know, let's say somebody accidentally uh took out uh 25 millimeter Gary Oak in the backyard.
Um, I don't see us finding them $50,000 for that.
Um, but let's say they had, you know, uh a bunch of straggly, you know, what they thought were straggly just twigs, and what they actually were is a bunch, it was a Gary Oak growth that was back in that corner.
Then, you know, we we'd want to make sure that we sent some kind of message about that so the rest of the public would be aware.
So that's the kind of conversation where, you know, we may bring something back to council on that.
And that would at this point it's a prerogative of myself up to a thousand.
Anything larger than that, if we're talking, you know, say a massive tree like uh uh or like especially a growth of trees, and we staff would definitely come back to council on that.
We'd be an in-camera meeting discussing where we should go, uh, what approach we're gonna take.
But in the meantime, we're gonna try to come up with something that kind of suits our day-to-day needs with regards to figuring out a value, and then the approach that we take when it becomes those rare occasions.
I again I've been here almost 10 years, and I don't recall a tree that's been removed maliciously that uh was significant in value.
So we don't want to, you know, spend you know, you know, tens of dozens of hours trying to figure out a process that may or may not occur, but we want to have something available to us uh with regards to an approach.
So that's how that's the way we would probably look at it.
Okay, thank you.
And if I can just um connect with that, you know, there's one thing about malicious removal, but there's also malicious damage.
So uh we're not just talking about, you know, there's gonna be a heavy skill on both aspects, right?
You know, when we talk about malicious damage, what we'd look at is is would it drastically affect mortality of the tree?
Right?
So it may not have killed the tree today, but if it's going to kill the tree three days from now or three years from now, because say they spiked the tree or done something like that, then in our minds that would be just as malicious as a removal.
Thank you.
All right.
Any other questions on on the penalties or anything?
Since we're on that specific point.
No, no, no.
Are you able to elaborate on a couple ones?
Uh so you answered my first question on significant trees, but amended water course, 30 meters.
Yeah.
So the previous bylaw, if if you were working, say let's say you had a shoreline property or uh uh you lived um say near craigflower creek or something like that if you had a tree in your backyard that was within 15 meters of craigflower creek you'd be required to have a permit regardless of uh species or size or anything like that well what we've done now is increase it to 30 meters so if your tree is within 30 meters of Craigflower Creek you'd now require that same permit okay and so that does that cover like reparian lines as well correct that's that's that same kind of idea and this is to match the I believe to match that repairing requirement of 30 meters we used to be 15 along the say the like I say the ocean water type places so we've done it to 30 to match.
We do have a question.
Thank you.
Okay.
Um Director rosenberg removal of building envelope exemption yes can you talk us through that certainly yep um so for the building envelope exemption what currently happens within the bylaw is any tree that gets um that lands within the building envelope is exempt from the replacement requirement um so we've now removed that exemption so if if regardless of where your tree is located on your lot if it's removed it's two for one.
Okay.
Okay.
Um now i'm I might be going just a little beyond here, and I'm s I'm not I'm sorry, counselor, I got you know this might be beyond the background.
Um there's there's a property that is in development um in V Royal, and I I don't want to get too too specific here, um, where there's some sizable uh the I I would say fir trees that have been cut down, um, presumably to to build a SFD, I would think.
Um what kind of process would be involved there?
Though there would they there would have been um uh an application to remove and is there be beyond um the two for one is there is there is is there anything more when the truly you know they appear to be significant trees you might know what I'm referring to any trees that are removed that um were not intended to be removed are subject to fines and penalties um so those processes um are being followed for any you know and that's not just with development that's with any homeowner if you remove a tree that you're not supposed to remove um there there can be consequences to that the size of that consequence depends on the tree and the nature of the infraction so on um with regards to development, um, one of the requirements for building permit is a tree permit.
So in that particular case where somebody looks at a building and says the building's in area X, but the tree was removed in area Y, if at the time area Y was within the building envelope, it's exempt from the replacement.
But if the tree was outside the envelope but impacted by the construction within the envelope, then it would be subject to um two for one replacement.
Does that answer your question?
Yeah, I think it does.
You know, with with what would appear to be significant trees, whether or not they're within or without the building envelope, they appear to be significant trees.
Yeah, and and in you know, in this particular case, size does not matter other than species or above that 12-inch uh DBH.
Right.
Thank you.
Please please carry on.
Thank you.
Um, so we did also uh reduce the maintenance period to one year.
That is um we think one from uh a management of the trees point of view, um, it's going to give us a better handle.
And currently with our developments, when a developer uh does all their landscaping, it's also one year.
So we were trying to tie some of it together so we can kind of uh keep an eye on things a little better, and that one year requirement made it a little easier.
So um it also helps with regards to securities and what we take for deposits and securities and so on.
So um that was a change.
It used to be two years, and then uh lastly, we've increased the um, I guess a couple more.
We've got the building envelope that we just discussed.
We did some priority processing.
Um this is mostly aimed at uh developers that you know show up on Thursday and say they want a tree permit.
Um, and you know, if if we haven't got the capacity to get it done, then it won't get done.
But if we do have the capacity, then we have the ability to assess them a hundred dollar fee.
And it is kind of uh odd to me that occasionally we'll get a homeowner who's got a 60 year old tree and they'll want their permit that they submitted today and they want it processed tomorrow.
And I think, well, the tree is 60 years old.
What changed yesterday to today that's made you decide that you need this permit today?
Um, so we have um, I don't remember if council recalls, but several years ago we were having a tough time getting permits uh done on time, and and sometimes we're having some lengthy waits.
Um, we did go to a uh arborist now that helps us out.
And from a capacity point of view, almost all of our uh tree permits are done well within uh plus or minus three weeks.
So this this permit process to speed up a process is just to let them have the assurance that it definitely would fit into that time frame if they really felt they needed to.
And it's a hundred dollar fee, it's optional.
Otherwise, the fees are free.
I mean, the other one is within the bylaw, what we've done to speed up the process because we are paying someone to go out to look at the trees, is we ask them to flag them.
Um, and as part of that permit process, they they acknowledge that they've flagged it.
If he goes out there and they're not flagged and it's confusing enough that he can't determine the trees, then at my discretion I can charge an additional fee of $100 to send him back out.
That fee includes his fee and our administrative fee to make that happen.
But again that's at a discretion.
So you know it's not a large fee but it's enough that you know people are aware of it and hopefully they try to make our lives a little easier when we do it.
And then the last one is the replacement tree.
It used to be 100 or 150 and now we've bumped it to 500.
So if somebody does not want to plant their trees, um, I have the discretion to say plant them anyways.
Um, but if somebody can't really plant their trees in that they won't thrive in that location and they really don't have the room and and they want to uh go with another option, then uh we have the ability to take $500 for each tree.
And we do have a fund that finance has set up that we'll put into specifically uh pay for a replacement of trees.
So in essence, for every tree removed, the town gets a thousand dollars, and we'll use that.
And we can use those for various things.
We can buy large trees like what we did in uh View Royal Park, or we can kind of do a school initiative where we go along and plant several thousand saplings in an area, and you know, when you do something like that, there's a mortality rate that's with that, but you end up with usually you know hundreds of trees that are planted and start to grow.
So we can use those funds various ways to uh increase the canopy long term.
Um next slide, please.
Ezra probably fell asleep while I was talking so long.
Um enforcement and penalties.
Um, we've kind of talked about that.
Um the ranges have been changed, um, the the small day-to-day stuff.
We used to say that we'd put it on your taxes, which uh we can't do.
Um, so it was kind of a it was a threat there, but we couldn't actually do it anyway.
So uh it was under advice that we get rid of that uh that threat.
So we've done that, but we we we do have the ability to go after those fines when we we um assessed them.
And then obviously we talked about the uh offensive act, the major penalties.
Um talked about the tree appraisal methods and what we're trying to come up with.
And last the security staff did look at um trying to bundle securities when we have large developments where we would take a landscape security and tie in the tree permit security with it.
And we've made the determination that that isn't a good idea because if you take a security for landscaping which would include the trees and then try to enforce the tree bylaw for lack of planting or not doing enough replacement trees, it's difficult to take that security because it was meant for landscaping.
So what we've decided is to keep the two fees separate.
So it wouldn't the amount of money that we require from a developer wouldn't change but the way we take the money in that it would be a landscaping uh security and it would be a tree permit security.
So that then if we had to, we had we would have the ability to plant the trees ourselves and take the monies from the security.
Whereas the other way we wouldn't be able to do that.
So that it's just to ensure that uh if an issue were to arise, uh the municipality would be covered with regards to taking care of the canopy and ensuring that we didn't have the tree canopy loss.
Um next slide, please.
I think that might be it.
That's it.
So um if the committee has any questions, I'll try to answer them as best as I can.
Uh I know there was a lot of uh edits in there, a lot of it was just kind of grammar and and changing things around, so it looked confusing, but that wasn't our intent to confuse you.
I hope we did uh uh meet all your expectations with regards to the changes, and it's our hope that you'll uh give us a recommendation of moving forward.
Any uh further comments?
Um I'm I'm I'm happy with it.
I'm just asking counselor matts and from me.
I think it's great.
Um more than happy to support it going forward to council.
Um just to just to follow follow-up question, um director.
When a sizable and presumably old tree is is cut down and it's say, you know, I don't know, anywhere between 100 and 150 years old.
Are the two that replace it um sizable, or can you just put in a dinky tree of the same species?
Yeah, there we don't have the ability to make them put in massive trees for massive trees that were removed.
No, within the bylaw, I I think we've got a height in there.
It's they're very small trees.
You're not talking about replacing the canopy today.
You're talking about replacing the canopy long term.
Yeah, you just don't have the ability.
And yeah, the part of that issue is the mortality rate when you start getting into bigger trees and then having to plant them at the right time.
And I I'm not saying you couldn't do that, but to make that a requirement would be so onerous on not only homeowners and developers, it would be almost unsustainable development wise.
It would be literally thousands and thousands of dollars per tree to try to do something like that.
It'd be very, very difficult.
Thank you.
Okay.
I just want to know if you could hear me to start with.
Okay.
Yes, we can.
Yeah.
Okay.
Yeah.
No, I didn't have any particular questions.
I like the fact that there's a very large penalty that can be imposed for people who intentionally do things wrong to um trees, substantial trees.
So thanks staff.
Okay.
Thanks.
Thank you, Ron.
A few questions uh for myself.
Um uh remind me and then um give me hope that a significant tree uh like the one on Stewart, um you know, I think it's part of the Stuart family, um, has the every ounce of protection, you know, that we can afford it.
If I'm being completely honest, I don't know the specific tree you're referring to.
But if you're if it's in your mind and top of mind, I'm guessing it's at least 12 inches in diameter at base height.
Um so under that rule, yes, absolutely.
And then you've got all kinds of species to get there.
And um this doesn't mean that council can't sometime in the future decide that there's some kind of significant tree that occurs or becomes significant because of some kind of event in the future.
We can come back and amend the bylaw.
Yeah, right.
Right?
This just does not mean it goes away, it just means it's not currently in the bylaw.
So you could always come back and amend this if you wanted to.
Yeah.
Well, you know, rather than coming back to amend it, um, you know, perhaps we should think about actually keeping it in because the the the I'll take a picture for for counsel.
But it's not in now, right?
The significant tree list that you is in your mind, we got rid of years and years and years ago.
Because we went purely to size.
So any tree that's over that 12 inch diameter, regardless of species, is protected.
So, like the big one in High Street as well that used to be on the list.
Right.
So even an apple or cherry tree would if it's 12 inches in diameter, requires a permit now.
A willow tree, a cottonwood.
So we'd have to be all I'm saying is I think you might weaken it if you just add in one particular tree, because at the moment it's just a rank of protection that if it's over that 12-inch diameter, no matter where it is or what it is in the town, it's protected.
Part of the amendments did include this the significant tree did have a couple of changes.
Like for instance, the cost of a replacement tree for a protected species was $100.
The cost of a replacement tree for a significant, or I can't remember which it was, but one was 100, one was 150.
So we removed that as well.
I can assure you, unless it's uh some kind of like a say future event where somebody plants a tree because, for instance, it's a memorial tree and it's well under 12 inches, then we could look at doing something.
But again, I I'm not aware of that ever occurring.
Um, so in the um list, we've got the list of protected trees.
Yeah, yeah.
Okay, thank you.
Um, but when an individual and it's it that's different from the list of trees that um you provide um property owners when they want to replace a tree.
Correct.
We currently don't have a list.
What we've done now with an amendment is what we've said is the first option is to replace the tree that's removed with a like tree.
So if you take down a garry oak, we'd like you to put back a garry oak.
You then have the ability to apply, for instance, typically what I do is when it becomes technical, I'm not an arborist.
I'll get an arbitrar's opinion on that, or I'll ask them to get their own arborist opinion.
So what I'll do in that case is if if they say they want to plant Gary Oaks, then I'll say get an arborus opinion that says a Gary Oaks would not uh thrive in your area, and then I'll consider a different tree for you to replace with.
Yeah.
Um I'm just trying to get some clarification that if somebody wanted to, you know, they cut down a particular tree, but they want now to replace it with a a mountain ash, which is a native tree, um, staff would consider that.
100%.
It's within the bylaw for us to be discretionary.
Great.
Um on the definition of damage.
The um, you know, I think it's, you know, there's malicious, but there's maybe unintentional, um, and what what concerns in the action or inaction.
And part of the inaction damage is just letting a tree um, you know, die from the drought and not water it.
And so is there any um way of addressing that in this bylaw from from the lack of attention and it's gone?
Currently, I would say no, there isn't.
And when I start thinking about how to enforce something like that, I would think that would be extremely problematic with regards to trying to say that somebody spent time not watering a tree.
I mean, you know, or say did something as a dash just as um covering its root zone when it rains so that it wouldn't get the water.
Um we don't have a capacity to look after that.
We don't have a capacity to monitor that.
I mean, certainly um, again, under the malicious uh part of damage, if it was obvious what they did, um, and then yeah, we could look at it.
But we don't have anything to ensure that they water the trees.
Now, under replacement tree, they have a time frame where they have to for that certain amount of time.
So under that uh time frame, they're required to water it because if when we go to do the inspection, if it's in decline, then I have the ability to to extend that replacement time.
Yeah, I think the um the the issue is that our um it it's going to be really the drought, and that that's the the responsibility of of the property owner, you know, to um um because otherwise they're gonna have the cost of you know having to remove the darn thing.
Um so you know I would I would like some way of being able to at least mention even if it's not enforceable at least mention that you know the responsibilities of inaction and um because it's not only drought but also neglect and letting ivy grow on the tree and and that kills the tree.
And it because it's like just like the whole definition is what happens over time that the tree would not be able to thrive and survive.
I'm not aware of an avenue.
Um, certainly um staff could go back and try to find something, but you know, we've looked at at least a half a dozen bylaws, and and we're not aware of anything that addresses those types of circumstances.
I think when it comes to watering, there's that other side of that sword as well, which is if we're in a drought, we're gonna worry about water conservation, and now you're picking, you know, what side of that sword do you want to be on?
Are you gonna deplete the water reservoir to water trees so that people can't have water if you're getting into heat sinks and all those other things?
Um, as far as monitoring people watering trees, if we're gonna make it them a requirement to water trees so they don't decline uh when they're in heat stress, um, that would be difficult to do on private property again to go door to door and saying, Are you watering your trees?
Um, we tend to under those circumstances do something with regards to our own trees as much as we can, but even you know, large areas like Nursery hill park is natural vegetation, all of those trees they don't get watered and and we do rely somewhat on you know nature to take care of them and and shadowing and and those types of things.
So I I guess then then you know part of that is um you know the the PR when when someone's replanting a tree and I guess the uh the the wording that I'm I'm concerned about with you know maintain uh good health for one year um I would just say maintain the good health of the tree and the tree will be inspected in a year's time.
So there's a there's a message there.
You know, you're not it's not just one year.
You got to maintain the health of the tree and we're gonna come back in a year.
That that's what we are saying, is it not?
That there's a one-year period of responsibility that the town is I I think if the message is maintain the health of the tree and we're coming back in a year to make sure everything is good.
It is a there's a subtle um difference there.
The um you know it it it's interesting you got um in the bylaw affixing not um permitted to affix anything to the branch or the tree trunk.
And I'm thinking of Christmas lights.
So is so Christmas lights would not be permitted to I mean it's you know technically, I guess I could go around and tell people not that they're in violation of the bylaw, but I can assure you that where we would use that is when you left your tree, your lights on the tree and strangled the tree.
Right.
That's the intent there, is that those lights and and ourselves, we have trees that have lights on them, and we will go and remove those lights and and make them loose again every couple of years.
So this is a long term, it's on permanent.
And my my last question is I think you've you've said it.
So with with um uh applicants, when they're identifying the trees that are um um uh they will identify them visibly.
Like there's gonna be a red tag on it.
That's the one that's going.
So that's correct.
Staff or know that.
There's a description, there's a general location.
Um, but just to make sure, especially when you get, you know, a group of trees, um, we want to know specifically which tree you're talking about.
So we asked them to flag it.
And usually we expect survey tape, but it can be a paint mark, it can be a ribbon, it can be all kinds of different ways to flag it.
Yeah.
No, they the report is really great.
It's a vast improvement.
I'm really pleased that we've extended the water course to 30 meters.
Great.
Yeah, congratulations.
Thank you, Chair.
Good.
So then we'll we'll start at seven o'clock with that again, and just in case there's any comments from the public, and then we can just pass the motion.
Right.
So we will do the motion, we'll just go back into parks briefly.
Yeah.
Perfect.
Okay.
Okay.
Everybody's good.
Okay.
Thank you, everybody.
So oh, Councillor Madsen sending us a he's right there.
I thought you couldn't hear us at that point, Counselor Madsen.
At any rate.
I I've been able to hear you the whole time.
I just had to do anything else.
Being cruel by suggesting that if you snooze you lose.
That was the nicest thing you said.
So thank you, everyone, and we'll see you at seven o'clock.
Thank you, John.
Thanks, John.
Okay.
So I'll call back to order the committee of the whole.
So this is the reconvening and for the evening part.
And really the very first item up is public participation period.
So this is the opportunity to speak on any item that is on our agenda tonight.
So if you would like to call in, this is now the time.
It's the number is 778-402-9227.
And when prompted, enter conference ID 851-192-760-pound.
Do we have any callers on the line, Steph?
Your worship, we do not at this time.
Okay.
So I think maybe we'll just pause for 45 seconds just in case um because it is just seven now.
Um so maybe we'll just take a little bit of a gap in case anyone would like to call in.
And then we'll go back to parks meeting just to finish off the tree bylaw and then to um zoning and planning.
Councillor Matson, what are you thinking you would like to do there?
You're gonna try and chair the meeting from home.
Uh well it's gonna be a pretty simple meeting, I guess.
Just somebody to uh it's probably easier if somebody there just gets people to ask questions or provide comments on the two items.
So I'll um yeah.
Okay, thank you.
No, your worship, we do not.
So I'll just check with staff again.
Do we have any caller staff?
Okay, thank you.
So Councillor Rogers, I'll pass it back to you for proposed tree protection bylaw and then you may as well keep it the chair for planning and development and then pass it off to Councillor Kowalovich at the end.
Right.
Okay.
Yes thank you and and uh hello every everybody who's out there um we had uh on the parks and recreation uh environment committee, we had a staff report I proposed tree protection by law, and um staff had gone through that pretty much um uh with us uh to give us the basic information and we had um anticipated there may be phone calls uh and the public calling in.
Um and staff just to confirm no one's there to speak to this matter.
That is correct.
Okay, thank you.
So we've we've had the discussion and um I wonder is it there's any more discussion?
If not, we can just motion to receive.
Second.
Okay.
I just uh one other uh comment.
It um you know, when we think about this and we have the the climate action uh we uh strategic plan, part of that, of course, for carbon is carbon sequestration and and uh the importance of trees, tree canopy for cooling.
And um there's any ways that when we think about this, how we can provide incentives.
You know, it's one thing.
Hello, can anyone's recommendations?
Hello, sorry to interrupt.
I just said one way.
Yes.
Hello?
I'm trying to call into the meeting.
Hey, who who is calling, please?
Linda Jeaurond, Ardently Place.
Okay, I'm not quite sure how you're anyhow, go ahead.
Hello.
Hello.
Hello, Linda.
Okay.
Did you want to address the committee?
The caller will need to turn off the background playing of the um council meeting?
Okay.
Okay, sorry about that.
Okay.
Can you hear me now?
And do you wish to address the committee?
I wish to address the committee about the tree by law.
Sorry, it took me a while to I didn't realize it was happening so quickly.
That's fine.
Just go ahead.
Okay.
Um I would like to say that I'm pleased that you have um put the uh building building so that the building envelope now the trees will be not automatically removed.
Um they'll be considered as part of the bylaw, they'll be protected in somewhat.
But I'm concerned that you're um only protecting the replacement trees for two year for one year instead of two because we're facing drought in the future.
So I think it would be better if you looked maintained and made sure that people's trees that they planted in replacement for trees that they've removed survived.
And to that end, I would request that you come up with some sort of a water bag system so that if you're charging a fee of $100 for the permit, maybe make that fee $150 and give a person three bags for the tr three replacement trees or whatever the the math turns out to be.
But I think we really need to emphasize that View Royal is very serious about the environment.
You recognize we're in the midst of climate change, we know we're going to be having more drought we want our replacement trees to survive.
This could be a a place of pride for the community and I'll just finalize that and say perhaps it's something that people in the community would actually go and purchase from the town if we had our emblem on them so that we're all working together to help our trees survive.
But that could be implemented at right now with the tree protection bylaw.
Thank you very much.
Good night.
Thank you.
Interesting comment um uh staff uh the suggestion by the caller or Linda is that um when we um have people replace their trees that we give them a water bag with the town's logo on it to ensure that um uh those trees survives the summer.
I think this is an aspect of water conservation, ensuring uh sustainability of the tree and also ensuring that uh carbon sequestration from the environment.
Is that um some something that the the staff could um work on and implement to promote?
Uh certainly my concern mostly would be funding.
Um we get 134 permits a year.
Uh when you get to a um development where at times it can be a hundred plus trees or more.
Um you might have an issue now, to be honest.
I'm not sure the cost of a bag.
I think you're talking at most, you know, a thousand or two dollars a year to provide those bags.
I don't think it's like a crazy amount of money.
Yeah um but certainly if that's council's wish we could uh i don't know if we need to make that a bylaw requirement but certainly we can you know have a policy where you know we can put it on our uh application and say if you'd like one we can certainly give you one to help with your trees something like that I think would be uh very sustainable.
Pay the fee yeah give increase the rate and give them a free bag right now yeah yeah so um oh John yes yeah I just had a and and I'm not sure if this is sort of within the confines of the tree bylaw per se, but I really have a concern and of what's happening on some of the some of the building lots when it comes to uh you know I don't know if we need to sort of change the uh the the allowable footprint to build on because I mean using that as an example the the lot on Beaumont.
Um I mean it's you know, we talk about sort of infill, those sorts of things.
And when you basically go through a property and it looks like it's you know clear-cut and blasted, you know, it does nothing for the trees that are, you know, certainly on the lot or or even the ones sort of with within the uh protected area of of of the property or even the adjacent property.
So I'm I've I just have a concern that uh some of the house sizes now are just so big that maybe we need to take a look at how big a footprint we allow them on on this properties because basically you know whatever the maximum is now they they seem to be getting that size.
You know, there's also the house on Stewart, very nice house, but it's like you know, they're all the houses now are just becoming enormous.
Okay.
I think that's a whole different conversation.
Yeah, it you know, it it it is an uh I understand what you're saying, it is a different conversation with um um building size, but it's um I think that the key essence of what uh staff are proposing to us through the tree protection by law is that whatever's in the building envelope now uh is um some the trees that they'll have to replace if they're of if I'm not mistaken staff.
You are correct, but I I think one of the uh side benefits is that uh before, once the building envelope was established based on house size, which can be bigger than the actual house, they could remove more trees.
Now they can only remove the trees that are directly impacted by the house itself, not by the building envelope.
So you should see a saving of trees overall.
So there's there is the benefit in the uh protection bylaw.
Okay, thank you, staff.
Okay, so uh seeing no further discussion, um we have we have the motion on the floor.
Yeah.
All those in favor?
Thanks, Carrie.
And uh I'll carry on then on behalf of Council Mattson to the um uh rezoning application uh number 10 Erskine Lane.
Thank you, uh thank you, Chair.
And staff, could you take that away, please?
Jeff Chow, Senior Planner.
I'm trying to share the screen now.
And I will uh actually I'm just gonna start describing the program while I talk a little presentation here.
Um this is an app rezoning application to um rezone uh change the zoning for an existing property at 10 Erskine Lane.
And uh it is for it's a it's a property that was rezoned to prevent apartment use um but specifically for 30 units and the proposal is to uh is to change the proposal to allow 43 units and because they propose to do a uh five-story building on that site so this property is at the end of uh just at the cul-de-sac for Erskine Lane um property uh it backs on to the townhouses at 14 Erskine Lane and on to the Galloping Goose Trail uh to the south.
There's two existing houses on it uh from before the the the original rezoning and uh there are a number of mature trees on the perimeter of the property.
It was rezoned in 2008 for 30 apartment units.
There were a number of community amenity contributions that were identified, including a sidewalk from the site all the way to Watkiss Way, and also another kind of a sidewalk from to the Gallup and Goose Trail connection on Erskine Lane.
And these amenities were to be secured in a covenant.
Uh unfortunately the covenant was not registered in association with the development permit um that has since lapsed.
So we have changed our processes now to when we have community many contributions that they'd be secured with the covenant at the before final reading of the bylaw.
Uh so the development concept for this uh for this rezoning is for a um five story private building with um uh underground and surface parking.
Um there would be uh individual um the the ground floor units would have uh direct connections to the street.
So it's not just uh one apartment building, it's got uh it has a better uh relationship with the street.
Uh the driveway would come off Erskine Lane and the underground parking because the site uh slopes down to the south that you sort of see here.
There's a there's uh kind of a wetland area that uh that's kind of a depression that was created when the rail bed for the Galapagos trail was was uh was built.
Uh these are some elevations of the building that show uh the top one is for the view from um from Erskine Lane, and the other key elevation is the uh west elevation, which is uh on the lower right, and that uh that shows how the building is um has is four stories with the fifth story set back to minimize impact on the uh adjacent residents.
Uh the site data um uh the proposal it would meet the parking requirements um and uh and uh however the floor space ratio and and site interview needs to be can needs to be uh confirmed because some road dedication is required.
So we need to double check those numbers and make sure we have the right numbers for floor space ratio and and uh and site coverage.
Uh the unit mix is predominantly two one and two bedroom units with uh several bachelor type units.
Um the development concept is to help illustrate the applicant's intent.
So the the farming character will be formally addressed at the at the time of uh development permit, which comes after rezoning.
Um staff notes that there's uh contacts illustration should be provided to show the relationship to the uh to the townhouses next door.
Uh but notes that the stepping back the upper floor really does reduce the massing, would also add some visual interest to the roof line.
And uh the way the site was designed is to um preserve trees in the southwest corner of the property to provide additional buffer to the uh to the uh Gallop and Goose Regional Trail and also some of the residents on the uh adjacent townhouse property.
The essential community plan context, um the sites designated mixed residential and the the previous zone and the proposed zone would would provide would uh are in compliance with the land use designation um and and generally uh generally you know meets the other general policies of VLCP, including um street oriented ground level units, uh a building zone that makes use of limited land, and it is a a site in the location with uh multimodal transportation opportunities um the with the proposed zone, these are the highlighted changes.
So the main changes are to the um instrument 43 units and relating to that is it would mean a change to the floor space ratio and the building height and and some other uh figures to be confirmed but uh in terms of the front setback and side setback there's no there's no change so the proposal fundamentally is to allow an additional 13 units um the site itself is not within any environmentally environmental development permit areas um the trees along the property line, shared property line with the townhouse project would have to be removed, but uh they would replace it with a hedge.
And this air photo shows some of the trees in the southwest corner that would be preserved.
In terms of community amenity contribution, staff recommends that a covenant be registered prior to fourth reading to formalize the previously identified community amenity contributions from the 2008 rezoning.
And for the additional 13 units they would be recommended that the policy of four thousand dollars per unit be applied to them, minus a community menu that that staff proposed for the frontage of the site on the cul de sac to provide native planting rather than grass and tree.
Right now, that area as shown in the photo there is primarily invasive species like blackberry.
And in this setting would be more appropriate because it is because the site kind of drops off along the side of that the galloping goose trail access.
That native planting would be more appropriate than trying to plant and maintain grass on a slope.
Under the town's uh CAC policy that was amended last year, 10% of the cash contribution would be uh transferred to the House Regional Housing Trust Fund to supplement the town's annual contribution.
Um alternatively, um the option could be to secure a cash amenity of $4,000 per unit as per the policy for all 43 units.
But um but from uh the rezonings that have happened in this area, the existing residents have made it loud and clear that that they're very interested in having improving the pedestrian safety along Erskine Lane.
So the sidewalk is probably uh something that would be an amenity for the area.
Transportation impact, speaking on behalf of the engineering department, the additional 13 units would not impact traffic volume significantly.
But to complete the engineering department's review under the guidelines for transportation impact assessments, there should be some commentary on vehicle and bicycle parking and look at transportation demand management opportunities because this site is so close to the Galloping Goose Regional Trail.
BC Transit supports the proposal because it would increase ridership along in this area and help improve increasing ridership helps increase service.
So that's kind of a um you know uh symbiotic relationship.
Uh Ministry of Transportation Infrastructure is also uh reviewing the transportation impact assessment at because this property is near a controlled access highway, and they would also have the um their approvals needed before forced meeting with the rezoning bylaw.
In terms of site servicing, standard requirements include sidewalk flow and site frontages, no net increase in post development site runoff, and that storm qual stormwater has to be treated before entering the municipal system.
The service and concept estimates that there is sufficient downstream capacity for the expected sewer flow from the development.
Also, although this the proposed zoning in this area was not part of the town's master drainage plan or DCC program, a recent study indicates that the municipal storm system is able to handle the no no improvements are needed to the to the drain system as a result of this rezoning.
Road dedication is required, actually is up to 4.8 meters, uh, which is quite a bit uh because the width of the Erskine Lane road allowance is substandard in this uh this area.
It's a bit of a bottleneck.
Um road dedication was also required for the rezoning applications across the street.
And that would be secured in the covenant as well.
So the next steps are to um provide the additional information that we've sort of discussed in in the report.
Uh and if there are any additional comments from the committee, uh the applicant is here to help answer questions.
Okay, yeah, thank you, staff.
Um questions, next question.
Thank you.
So I I just want to be clear on the community or or so at the moment with the zoning on the property, they can go ahead and apply for a DP for the 30 units and build that with no community amenities according to what you're you're telling us.
Is that right?
Um through you um your worship.
Uh the amenities are not secured.
Uh and and certainly the applicant is aware of um that the amenities were not secured through a covenant.
Um so there is still a development permit process to go through.
Right.
And certainly um yeah.
But what I'm asking is if they chose to, they could, if they just stuck with the 30 units, go directly to the development permit process.
That's correct.
We are looking to re-secure the amenities that were previously promised, then we could consider the extra 13 units.
I mean, is that sort of it in a nutshell?
That is it in a nutshell.
Okay, thank you.
That's all the questions I have.
Yeah, thanks.
Um, any other questions, comments?
Comments?
Well, questions to staff, and I see we have the applicant here as well.
Um, thank you for coming.
Uh so any questions to either staff or the applicant?
I I have a question for the applicant.
Sure.
So given that the there was a previously was a commitment to put in certain amenities for the rezoning as it currently stands.
If council decides not to give you the increase in units and height, would you still live up to your previous agreement and add those amenities?
Thanks for your question.
Yeah, I think uh I believe the the owner of the development um Moji is in the meeting as well.
Um and he I wasn't involved in the previous rezoning, and he was.
Um so moji, um I might throw that over to you for your plans if the rezoning was not successful.
I'm missing I sorry, I missed that.
I don't she's I don't know she's presuming the owner is in the meeting.
Yeah he he was here um if if he's not able to speak um that that honestly hasn't been discussed with me.
I'm the development consultant for the project and I'm a planner.
The the goal with the extra 13 units and that extra density is to keep the units as affordable as possible.
The the cost of construction these days um as we all know is really impacting um any kind of affordability for units, whether they're you know protected affordable or market units.
Um, so the goal is really to go for that extra density.
Um, and we're happy to provide those amenities through this process.
Um yeah, if Moji's here, he can speak to uh yeah, he should be in the meeting.
So Moji, if you're here, maybe you can unmute to jump in there.
Hi, um uh dear worship and the staff.
Um I totally agree with what Eleni mentioned.
Um we honor what the decision is.
I mean, the main purpose of adding the 13 units was uh first of all, it was falling into the zoning.
Uh we're not increasing the uh uh uh the variances on the setbacks.
Actually, in the in the new design that was not in the original design, we are dedicated dedicating a big portion of the property into the road that was not falling into the original design.
And the main purpose is because of the cost of construction increase and uh making the units more affordable in densities is always the first uh uh solution for it.
I mean that's the main purpose within the guideline of the zoning.
We would love to to apply for the the extra 13 units.
Uh, plus um we are able to provide the the sufficient parking that is required.
Um so that's the purpose okay so if i understand that you're saying that uh without the um uh uh approval the additional uh units uh you will not build the sidewalk and you won't improve the galloping goose trail access uh uh no i'm not saying that but it it it definitely makes it much more difficult for a 30 unit uh uh development to to carry all that cost because building the sidewalk from the uh if if you look at the road from the site to all the way to what kiss way and coming back to galloping goose it would be especially with today's prices would be a big burden and I'm not sure that if they a 30 unit development can take it of course when it's more units uh we can share the cost between uh I mean uh more number of units and it's more tolerable was no road dedication uh within the new uh development Jeff can can speak more about that, but uh within the new one uh we are happily dedicating uh more of the property into the left.
Okay.
So um staff question question to you then.
Um is the um is part of the problem um the uh frontage so when the original application in 2008 was was made um the we didn't get a covenant for the frontage for sidewalk?
Is that the problem?
Uh through the chair, that that's correct.
Well it's not frontage, they'd be required to do their frontage, but it's the amenity of of providing not to Marcus way to Marcus way, yeah.
Okay, uh Council Matson, uh, I think your question was that particular question was uh answered.
Um do you have any other questions?
That I've again comments, but that was my main question.
So thank you.
Okay.
Any other uh comments or questions?
I've got comments for sure.
Um I just got a couple of questions before we get there.
So um staff, a question on on the whole thing with the 2008, and it's really unfortunate that um uh we didn't get our ducks lined up and and do what we needed to do is in terms of the covenants.
That uh is is our fault.
Um but it says in in the report that the DP approval lapsed after 24 months.
So isn't this a brand new DP?
Um through you, Your Worship.
Uh if the rezoning is successful, a development permit will also be required.
So it is brand new.
Yes, uh, yeah, so the zoning we've done.
The zoning is done for the 30 units, yeah.
When it would be a new DP for sure.
Right, right.
Okay.
So um I I guess another question to staff is the um the parking.
Um when we had um number seven uh do their designs.
They did the design into the front of um uh and uh improvements to Erskine Lane and and the cul de sac with parking in the middle.
And um so now we've got and all this based on us assuming that number 10 was going to have the 30 units, it was going to be three stories, and it was we had already approved all that stuff.
So does this additional um number units present further pressures and problems for uh a reasonable sharing of the parking in within the cul-de-sac and on the street?
Uh through the chair.
Uh the the additional density, we're talking 13 units.
Uh the proposal, the development concept complies with the uh the parking requirements for all 43 units.
So I imagine in the uh in the additional information that we're requesting uh in terms of on-site parking, um, they would provide some more information on how many visitors perhaps how many visitor spaces are are proposed.
So just like just like was as was done with the uh proposal late last year for the project beside the four-mile pub, um they complied with the zoning uh with required parking uh and based on the location they were able to provide more uh visitor parking spaces than than they typically would.
So, but the uh part of the additional information would be would be to look at you know what's the right amount of resident versus visitor parking for this for this uh for this property and in a way that will minimize off site impact in the road.
Thank you.
I do have a couple of questions for the applicant.
So uh a question, you know, we were really impressed with uh number nineers coming.
Um uh they they had a very, very um, I think courageous um um transportation plan where incentives were made um uh for uh bus passes and and um and all that uh sort of thing.
Uh how do you propose um to uh provide incentives to your uh tenants?
Um and I this is a rental, right?
Uh it hasn't been fully decided yet, um, but rental is definitely on the table for this project.
So, how do you how are you provide incentives uh for active transportation to minimize uh car use?
Yeah, so um we actually did um since we initially submitted the rezoning package, um we did update our TIA to include some transportation demand management.
Um so we haven't uh looked at those in detail yet.
Um, but because of the site's location, I think it's quite likely that it'll just the the project will attract folks who are interested in cycling and transit use.
Um the easy access to the Gallop and Goose makes it extremely convenient for commit commuting by bike.
Um, and it's a very quick walking distance to transit stops.
Um I think that the the size of the units and the unit mix also lends itself to that.
Um this would be a great building for young professionals, young couples, perhaps even students in the studio units.
And as we know younger folks are getting driver's licenses at they're getting fewer driver's licenses.
The rate is lowering over time.
So yeah, I think I think that's something that we'll look at some more to see if there's any additional incentives that we can look at.
But we have fully met the bicycle parking requirements for the secured long-term bicycle parking, as well as some outdoor racks um just off of the the road there um and i yeah i i think the location itself um is a bit of a transportation demand management because it lends itself to different forms of of active transportation so well yeah i agree uh i you mentioned the number of units i don't see any three bedroom for families yeah it's currently designed with mostly one and two bedrooms um with a few studio units um moji can jump in um on the design side if if they considered any three bedroom units um but i think the size of the project um and maybe uh the location uh it was determined it was best for those sizes of units.
Um Moji, do you want to add anything to that?
Um sorry this like that no uh yeah maybe we can get something back in writing.
I'm afraid the uh the feedback is quite awful.
Yeah so I'll let you come back.
But certainly if um you know I'm I'm for me uh yeah this you're next to a school you're next to easy transportation and I think you really should start thinking about um you know amending your your floor plan so that you do have three bedroom for families so that's a that's a suggestion for you the other like question for you do you have an elevator uh there would be an elevator yes because it's over two stories.
Um so it's a I believe that's a building code requirement.
Yeah, good.
That's important for seniors and disabled.
Good.
Absolutely yeah all right.
Thank you.
That's all the questions I had if you wish so it's so John I I do have one more question.
Since we were talking about trees, one one of my concerns in this project is the impact on the adjacent townhouses.
And I note that all the trees along that in between the two properties are going to be cut down and then a hedge is going to be up there which will obviously not give the same you know visual will will have a significantly bigger visual impact.
So why do all the can you let me know why all the trees can have to be cut down and is there a way of uh preserving these that buffer?
Yeah, I think um primarily that came from the Arborist report, although we can go back and and look at that and see if it would be possible to save any.
Um, and I also I was reading the staff report before the meeting and saw that um there was some comments about ensuring that the privacy is maintained between the two properties.
Um so we we just received that comment obviously through the the report for tonight's meeting, but that's something that we can look at to make sure that the screening and the privacy would be maintained there.
Um and I believe the recommendation from staff was also to to have a concept sketch showing both of the both the townhouses and uh our property there.
Um so we'll we'll definitely take that into consideration.
And that's something we heard from the neighbors when we had a bit of an engagement with them.
Um, that the the height and the privacy are are definitely something that they're um the privacy is what they're seeking.
So I'm curious.
Your worship comes.
So thank you.
My question, I think, is for Director Rosenberg.
I mean, it would seem like we anyhow we have a few choices ahead of us, but we're with Erskine Lane.
Obviously, when we rezoned this property way back in 2008, the sidewalk on the same side of the street as the townhouses was of critical importance.
Now we're getting a sidewalk on the opposite side of the street because of all the other development.
I mean, is it reasonable to think of Erskine Lane as being a street that has sidewalks on both sides?
I mean, is that something we want?
Is it turning it into a major road that we don't want?
Or I'm just curious from an engineering point of view, what what the thoughts are on that.
Your worship, I I I always hesitate with the word reasonable.
I think people's expectations these days with regards to the services we provide tend to be uh significantly skewed.
Um, I think pedestrian activity with regards to convenience would say that that that side would be used by all the people in the townhouses.
Um, certainly that new 43 lot development from a pedestrian volume and anything else, certainly not, even from a traffic volume.
I mean, the vast majority of traffic on Erskine is going to be at the top end.
So, as far as getting across the road to the sidewalk that will be on the east side, east side, it wouldn't be that heavy.
So it wouldn't be tough to get across.
But that being said, during the Erskine 9, uh certainly the people in the townhouses wanted a sidewalk and lobby for it quite vociferously, if I recall.
So I definitely think it's something that would be wanted by the neighborhood if you went out to them.
And it's certainly, I think from a again, pedestrian ease, they tend to not want to cross the street to go up the road.
And some of them will just drive, walk up the grass, for instance, perhaps creating a beaten-down path.
Um, and we do have a nice connection now with the roundabout that's gonna come off and start down that path anyway.
So it's almost looks intentional that we would pull a uh sidewalk down there.
So I I definitely can can um reason why it would be uh utilized and well withdrew.
Thank you.
That helps.
Yeah, and indeed, uh I certainly recall that was a major selling point um on number 14, but also was the um and Ron's point, the buffer of trees, you know, because I I'd love to see the um uh staff.
Can you bring back the 2008?
The next time it comes to us, uh, the 2008 design, because I'm sure there was um uh a bank of trees that uh the previous applicant had uh committed to.
Um to the sheriff we can provide that at the next for the next meeting yeah super yes sorry question uh to the applicant you you mentioned in in um in response to the question about the hedge vis-a-vis the trees that you had been um consulting with the residents of number 14 Erskine Lane and um we we of course as you know have received you know considerable comment and correspondence from them um but not um not about the privacy aspect so so your discussions, what can you tell us about your discussions with the residents of number 14?
Yeah, thank you um so yeah, we we held a small community meeting primarily with the residents of 14 Erskine Lane.
We dropped off postcards with a larger radius, including a crosswalk his way into that subdivision.
But I think I believe everybody that attended was from 14 Erskine.
So I think folks's concern was primarily due to the rate of change overall on the street and not so much with our specific development.
There's more rezoning applications coming.
So I think there was a bit of um concern about what the street was gonna look like and what the impacts would be with all of those units being approved.
There was concern that folks were educated and they knew about community amenity contributions, but some felt like the amenities from other projects, the community amenity amenity contributions, hadn't gone to sort of local benefits that would offset the impacts of the large developments.
So they voiced sort of a desire for community amenities from this project to be focused on the local area and then on the street, which I think the sidewalk, both the sidewalk and the connector to the Galloping Goose, those would both be valued by that community.
And they actually specifically brought up the connector to the Galloping Goose.
They asked if it was gonna remain, and if it was, if part of the amenity could be improving it.
So it sounds like that's something that staff is seeking, anyways.
That was that was about the gist of it.
It was it was largely the rate of change.
And we did offer some folks felt like some more in-person meetings would be helpful because there's a lot of seniors that live in that development.
So we do plan on going back to the community at some point after this meeting to show them if we've been able to incorporate any of their comments and see if they have any final ones before the project moves forward more.
And I would just like to add, going back to a previous question, Moji was able to text me, and on the top floor of the building, we have designed it to have one three-bedroom unit and another three-bedroom plus den.
So there will be at least one or two three-bedroom units in the project.
Thank you.
Just to follow up.
So regarding the trees, so the concerns about privacy, so were they were they speaking specifically to could you leave the trees there, please?
Or or um were they feeling like they were good they were going to be overlooked anyway?
No, um it was uh it was a pretty in-passing comment just that the extra height might provide more of a a view from the building into the neighboring development.
Um so we just noted that as something to incorporate into the design to make sure privacy was maintained between the two sites.
Okay.
Okay, thank you.
Thank you.
Interesting.
Any uh further comments or well, I'll I'll make a comment.
Sure.
I mean, I I'll move receipt of the report.
So okay.
And so I I guess for me, I I mean, if and I think staff needs some clear direction here on the community amenity.
I think that's what they're looking for.
Um so I suppose for me, if it's a if it's a choice between possibly getting the 30 units with without the sidewalk and without the um the CACs, then I I would support the extra 13 units on the condition that we are going to get the sidewalk that was promised in 2008, and that we're going to get the CACs on the additional units, which is what staff sort of suggesting.
So we'd get the CACs on the 13 units and the sidewalk that we were promised.
And the Gallatin Goose as well.
There was a right, right, yeah.
Yeah.
Um, so if that's the case for me, then I'm I'm certainly supportive of moving it on to the to the bylaw reading stage.
Thank you.
Uh any other comments.
Um sure.
I'm I'm less comfortable.
Um I'm I put myself in the position of the the residents of number 14 who have have um who are have put up with a lot.
Many of them are long long term residents and and understand that change happens but the rate of change as as um the applicant mentioned has been enormous.
And this isn't a big ask but it's another ask.
And I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm simply um not um in favor of more height and more density yet.
Okay.
And it's challenging to uh to look at this uh on its own, but it's important to do that as well uh as an individual uh applicant.
Um but we must as council look at it as a whole for the neighborhood as well.
Uh I I'm interested in community amenities.
I'm interested in this area because of the uh available modes of transportation.
Uh I know that uh it's an area we would like to be developed.
So um I'd support to go to the to the next stage um uh and and remain cautious and and monitor every everything quite closely to make sure we're making proper decisions moving along.
Thank you.
Councillor Madison.
Yeah, thank you.
Uh you know, when I look at the potential impact of another two stories overlooking the townhouses, that's that's probably my most significant concern.
And to be honest, if the residents uh object to this because of the height, I will support them.
I just think at this point we've put so much onto them in terms of all the development that's going on and been placed on this street, uh, that I really think that we have to be particularly aware and cognizant of their concerns and their issues.
And if they feel that this is reducing their quality of life, then then I will certainly support I certainly won't support adding that additional height if it has that impact on them.
And so that irrespective of you know amenities, etc.
Thank you.
Yeah, as as far as I'm concerned, um uh unfortunately um the fact that we failed to um um do the covenant uh will not go over well with the residents um they had uh expected uh us to do our job when we approved it back 2008 um uh and yes they certainly wanted uh the sidewalk it's there was a continued point they they raised uh as the discussions went on with number seven number nine and um and as well as improved access to the Gallican goose that they used a lot uh the third point that the residents uh were really uh from my recollection uh wanting was uh in in protection of the trees uh to have that tree barrier between the the two buildings.
And that's when it was three stories.
So now we're talking five.
Um I I think the the applicant has to work hard to uh make sure that uh that screening is going to be um as good or uh as as what they got.
The other consideration is is possibly on the two floors, at least a fifth, is to set it back off of away from um number 14 on I don't know what side that would be the north side, uh, so that there would be some feeling of of distance that uh that wouldn't be uh imposing and over over top of them.
So that might be a thought.
Um, but yes, I'm I'm prepared to see it go forward to the next level, and and uh I'll be very curious to see what the residents have to say.
Yeah, which I think just one final comment would be I mean, it's important that the residents understand that I suppose if we want that so I mean, regardless, I I agree that it's unfortunate that whatever we did in 2008, we didn't lock in that sidewalk.
But the unfortunate reality now is to get the sidewalk on that side, we pretty much have to allow the extra units.
So that's that's the choice to be made, and that's why for me I'm saying that I'm prepared to look at it because I personally think it's better to allow the 13 units than get that sidewalk.
But that's something that the residents in in 14 earth can can weigh and and feel how important that is to them.
So, John, I I I one more comment.
Just just in terms of the right in, Councillor Mattson.
Sorry, I sort of have to and miles away.
But the only from from my perspective, given this was a council error, that I think that council should make good for the sidewalk irrespective of what happens in terms of this project, whether they get the addition, you know, on whether who's going to pay for it.
It's again it was our mistake and we need to sort of in in in all good faith we have to uh do what the residents had anticipated we were going to do.
Thank you.
Um I see the app would the uh committee be prepared to hear from the applicant.
Sure.
Sure, go ahead.
You I think you have your hand up.
I just wanted to address a couple things.
Thank you.
Yeah, I appreciate that.
Um, I know Moji wasn't able to get the tech working, so I just wanted to address a few things.
Um, one of the reasons so many trees are lost is also because of the road dedication, which um was not a requirement at the previous rezoning.
Um, but with this uh rezoning, it pushes the building back and changes sort of the dimensions of the site that we have to work with.
So unfortunately, it has meant that more trees are being lost.
Um, but we will be looking at through our landscaping when we go for DP, looking at the landscape plan, trying to provide as much privacy and screening as possible.
Um also um Moji has noted um that although uh the original rezoning was for three stories, I believe there was an uh an amendment or an additional rezoning um for four stories.
Um he's moji is also asking if he is able to um, I think he was been muted by the admin, so I don't know if he's able to speak again or try to if there's no echo.
So when it comes to the next meeting, we'll we'll have that verified.
I think you may be correct.
Okay.
Yeah, thanks for raising that point.
Um, so we have a motion on the floor and um uh committee members.
Um I'm wondering at one point would we like to refer this to the advisory committee?
Is that um a consideration of the two advisory committees?
Sure.
Yeah.
Okay.
So um maybe we'll move receipt first and okay.
Well we we I I mean we can just do a friendly amendment to the motion to to receive and and refer to the to the advisory committee.
Well there's a whole lot there for the folks that you proceed on.
Yeah, yeah.
Yes, Councilor Master.
Yeah, I I'm just wondering if it's premature to send it to the advisory committee before it comes back to us again.
Uh with you know some more meat on the bones in terms of the issues we're raised, because if we're if we don't have all the answers right now, you know, it's unfair to send it to the advisory committees before we've got a better idea of of everything.
I think once we get um, yeah, let's just say that we're gonna give ourselves a heads up that we and don't we won't forget to send it to the advisory committees once uh staff feels it's uh all the uh appropriate information has been gathered.
You may want to check with staff because I I don't think staff would be bringing it back to committee of the whole again.
I think they'd be bringing it straight to council now with with the answers to the feedbacks.
Knit Lindsay is nodding her head.
So I suspect if we want to keep it moving, we should send it to the advisory committees now, and then all that information can come forward to council.
Yeah, yeah.
Okay, perfect.
Did we gotta move in a second?
Uh all those in favor?
Against carry.
Thank you very much.
And now we'll go to the next one, uh, number five, Risk and Lane, staff again.
I'm a community planner here at the town.
Thank you, Chair.
Uh, my name is James Davison.
Going to share my screen here.
So uh this is a rezoning application for five Erskine Lane, introducing um application to rezone to a six-story strata condominium.
So um not not rental but strata, 99 units at a proposed density of 1.97 FSR.
Uh, this is in the intensive mixed use, uh, so different to the mixed residential that was that was presented for 10.
Intensive mixed use with a maximum FSR of 2.5.
So they're under it a little bit.
Currently zoned A3 rural residential.
It contains two detached residences.
Triangular, there is very little frontage onto Erskine Lane.
Galloping Goose frontage and backs onto uh current development site at 7 Erskine Lane.
Uh CD zone will be uh will will be required to permit apartment use.
Uh the rezoning addresses zoning, uh zoning issues of land use, density, standards for lot coverage, percentage of impervious surface, and height and siting of buildings.
So we have a table here that shows um the proposed uh versus the IMU land use designation uh again uh under the floor area, under the density, uh 38 units per acre, 94 units per acre.
Um, excuse me, 38 units per hectare, 94 units per acre.
Uh building height proposed is six stories.
Uh there is more than the required uh vehicle parking provided, 138 spaces versus the 117 required.
There has not been any uh significant discussion about allocation of visitor parking, but there will there will be ample opportunity for that given the excess of spaces.
Bicycle parking is meeting the zoning.
At the time of bylaw reading, staff will request that a calculated height of the buildings be provided for the purpose of drafting the zone table.
We have drafted zone tables with specific heights in mind in the past, and staff expects to do that coming forward.
Again, uh parking is provided at 138.
Uh, parking details will be confirmed at the development permit stage when the number of units is confirmed.
As far as the design goes, design uh detail will be considered by uh council uh if if the the application comes forward to form and character development permit stage.
So while there is uh a rather detailed design uh presented here, this is um currently just a proposal.
There are two levels of underground parking proposed, uh largely under the building, but there is a portion of the site shown here uh where the underground zoning extends into the landscaped area to the northwest.
So as you can see, the building is in white.
So we don't need to dwell on this, but uh it's it's indicated as a change area within the OCP.
The the IMU describes townhouses in low rise apartments as a land use and up to five stories with a maximum floor space ratio of 2.5.
And the proposed zoning can be supported because it would comply with the policies encouraged, encouraging growth within the hospital neighborhood center, which which uh would um look for higher density in neighborhood center, uh promoting walkability, cycling, transit use, uh community amenity contributions are proposed that can be used to fund local improvements to enhance pedestrian safety and the neighborhood quality of life.
Regarding the transportation impact, the applicant has provided a draft impact assessment.
Uh it it it will require further staff scrutiny and uh perhaps third-party review.
Um the current report doesn't flag any deficiencies, uh peak trips are between 30 and 80.
Staff is recommending that road improvements on the south side of Erskine Lane between the cul-de-sac and the subject property be in accordance with the town's engineering specifications.
The report will need updating following staff's initial review.
So the capacity upgrade of the storm drain will be required.
Approximately cost uh $100,000.
That number will have to be confirmed.
The site, as is 10 Erskine Lane, the site is uh at five, is not within a sensitive terrestrial development permit area, and it is mostly disturbed.
There's a significant amount of invasive vegetation on the site.
Um, the the the draft arborist report has shown that approximately 30 protected trees will be removed, and the town has a two to one replacement policy for removed trees.
It may be difficult to um to place 60 trees on that site, so uh the the town may consider placing those trees elsewhere in the town.
Uh the the applicant is now provided a geotechnical report one is coming soon and uh the report is required at this stage to assess the viability of the site the proposed development it's it's significantly rocky site there and and some blasting will be required the uh the electric vehicle charging stations uh reminded the council that um that our zoning bylaw requires one electric vehicle charging station on the lot um and uh the development concept would provide pre wiring for every vehicle spot uh the site contamination work is in progress.
The neighboring property at seven Erskine Lane uh had a history of industrial uses uh and underwent a contaminated site remediation.
Jeff indicated that through that process, no contaminated materials had migrated onto a five Erskine Lane.
That was the initial report that will be confirmed through the ongoing work in that regard.
Regarding the community amenity contribution, the policy rate is $4,000 per attached residential unit.
So for this proposal, it would be almost $400,000 at $396.
It was recommended the community amenity contribution be secured in a covenant as a condition of the rezoning, and under the town's CAC policy, 10% of the contribution is provided to the Regional Housing Trust Fund to supplement the town's annual contribution.
No detailed discussion has been had regarding the allocation of the remainder of the CAC funds.
As previously mentioned, the site's part of the hospital neighborhood center.
This this location is is an ideal uh setting for um transit for uh access to the galloping goose and access to employment.
Outstanding issues, following issues uh will be addressed before the item returns to council for bylaw readings.
Uh site servicing report needs updating to reflect the town's requirements.
Uh traffic impact assessment needs refining.
Uh the site profile work as as discussed will need uh completion.
Uh further discussion uh may be had around providing an affordable component.
Uh this site is is um is not a rental, it is a strata, so um the the options uh the options there are a little bit different than if this was a rental project.
Um but we can come back to council with uh options should council want it.
Provision of a geotechnical report is required.
An investigation into the ability of the site to support mature tree growth under the current underground parking siding.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Any questions?
I don't have any specific questions on this one.
No, thank you.
I do have thoughts.
Yeah.
Any questions, members?
Um Council Nasson, any questions to staff?
Um no questions.
I do have some comments, so uh I see the are you the applicant, sir?
Is it Rachel Samson?
I think.
Sorry, I think it's Rachel.
If you can care, it's the haircut.
Oh, sorry, Rachel.
My mistake.
I thought I saw Richard.
It was I couldn't read.
Please continue.
Hi, yes.
Thank you, Chair and Committee.
I'm here to answer your questions this evening on behalf of the ownership group.
Okay.
Um I I have one question to staff.
Um you know this um I'm wondering why we're not requiring a dedication of a lane parallel to the galloping goose with the eventual plans when number two gets developed, that there would be an um an exit for Erskine Lane to go out to hospital way.
So I'm thinking of um roads like Aldersmith.
Aldersmith with all those homes, we uh we built in an exit lane for uh the traffic to get out and get to a light.
Um, on of course, granted that was a busy road there, but um I I cannot think of you know uh another road that has so many um units being built on a very short narrow lane and uh no other emergency egress aside from that one entrance off the Watchkiss Way.
And we know that number two uh will eventually be built, and I'm sure a future council would say, why the heck didn't we think even consider the ideas of having some alternate egress at least out of Risken Lane?
It would certainly take the pressure off and um probably be a welcome consideration for isn't the elevation change monument?
Yes, there is a monumental elevation change indeed.
But I think it's um even though it's it's you know significantly high, the fact is that along that um uh that property of um number five is a boulder wall.
And um I doubt that that boulder wall is um uh uh gonna have longevity to it.
I'm sure that's going to be um uh likely revamped.
So uh um I guess that's one of the things I would like staff to come back to um to uh to the committee and and give some thoughts on and on the feasibility.
I again I know it's very high, but I I would I think we'd be remiss if we didn't at least consider why don't we see if this is going anywhere?
Yeah, with a true.
If it were to go anywhere, it certainly would need another way out.
Um, okay, so I'll move receipt of the report.
There's a mover receipt.
Is there a second here?
Second?
So I guess for me, I there's a few things I have on.
Okay.
Without comments.
I mean, in general, I feel withers can lane that you know it's just too much to redo rezone this one as well.
You know, with the and and I think in fairness to the residents, we need to wait and see how the others build out and then look at this.
But beyond that, I don't really like this one heck of a lot either.
It's it's a really prominent site, it's visible, hugely visible.
Um, and a six story building on that, I'm not sure that you know, even for the the pieces I said before that i would be supportive of that i think it's really going to stand out um and i would have a hard time being convinced of that so maybe something i mean maybe even a townhouse complex or something would be more suited for this site i don't know but at the moment i don't think in fairness to the residents on erskine lane that i could support um moving this forward thoughts from me thank you any other comments i'm sure counselor i'm gonna start by i i agreeing with david uh just in terms of it this shouldn't be dealt with until we actually see what this the whole road looks like the whole area looks like when it's all built out.
But and I also agree, I mean at the density is way too high, like 94 units per acre, way too tall, and it's it's gonna sit out there like a sore thumb forever, w whatever goes in there.
And uh the other aspect of this is if council you know did did allow this to go in as it is, then it it it'd be essential that you have some sort of affordable comp uh component in there because um you know we're we're getting sort of we're not really getting anything for we wouldn't be getting anything for building something so dense and so obtrusive.
So but so anyways, the long and short of it is I uh I just couldn't support us moving this forward at all the way it currently is.
It and even the town uh a townhouse proposal would from my perspective would have to wait until after we see what the project the whole area looks like.
So thanks.
That's it.
Thank you.
Yes, thank you.
All of that.
Um I um it's it's too much, it's much too much, it's it's it's too high, it's too dense, and uh, and I really feel that the applicant uh needs to take into consideration the mood of the neighborhood and and wait likely wait a while uh it's it's this this whole neighborhood is feeling quite hammered by development and this just won't go down well um i do want to say that i of all of the of all of the aspects of this particular development i like the idea of the outdoor area above the parking area um but that's it that's it it's it's too much it's too tall and and it's not particularly attractive that's it's well i i want to thank the applicant for their interest in the town of Uroyal.
Uh please don't get overly discouraged tonight.
Uh this is very common, as you know, to have various iterations of uh these type of uh applications happen.
Uh you've been sent a clear message that uh this is too much at this time, uh, but we of course are always willing to reconsider moving forward and work with you and of course work with our most important constituents in the area uh to come up with something that is palatable for everybody.
Indeed.
Thank you.
Uh yes, uh the residents of uh number 14 uh had contacted me when they received your flyer, and uh they were shocked and scared.
Um they were already shell-shocked with number seven, number nine, uh, and the number of vehicles uh going in, and this would uh the Euro proposal is another 138, and doesn't matter what a traffic study says, uh, it's just um you know, again, this is a very small lane.
Um and yet the height is unbelievable, you know, six miles on uh six miles, six stories on top of a rock um would be uh just an incredible um uh concern for the rest of of the town.
Uh you could see it probably from the McKenzie Interchange.
Um, and so and this is a disturbed site.
So frankly, blast the rock out of it.
Blast the rock, level it to number two, and uh, so that you can um, you know, you know, then you may be able to consider some height.
Then if you put the road out to number two or offered some um alternate access, that would be, I think, very encouraging for the uh the residents of Risken Lane.
But I I do note that while number nine and the other um number 10, you've heard all of them have had CACs, and they've had to come come up with sidewalks or a traffic circle.
So, my question to to uh uh the the developers the number five, what else would you bring to town to the town for our consideration and for the community's benefit beside the CACs?
So uh, and frankly, the little park that you've got is great for the strata, but it means nothing to the residents.
In fact, I don't think you need a park area because you've got Chancellor Park um a very short distance away.
So it's um you know please take this constructive suggestions and criticism so that uh we can uh you guys get a development and the town gets something that we would really be pleased with.
Thank you.
So we have a motion on the floor to receive.
All is a favor against carried.
So just just before it goes to public works.
So just for anyone watching at home who's thinking about calling in for question period, we have one last item here this evening, which will be quite a quick one.
So you may want to consider calling him relatively soon for question period coming up where you can ask a question about anything.
It doesn't have to have been on the agenda tonight.
And with that, I will pass the chair to Councillor Kualovich.
Thank you.
I'd like to call the public works and transportation committee meeting to order.
We will move right down along to new business, unless anyone has anything that's surprising me.
Uh, to his worship Mayor Screech to talk about sidewalk clearing.
Thank you.
So I did I did send a motion, and I think I'm just going to make the motion, and then if there's a second or I'll I'll speak quickly to it.
Director Rosenberg got his hand up before I even make the motion.
Yes, Director Rosenberg, please.
Did he?
Oh, okay.
I just heard the word quick and I was afraid I wasn't going to get at least two seconds of conversation.
Um I am prepared to speak to it a little bit tonight, your worship.
I I did kind of guess on what you might want to look at.
And um I've got several decades of snow clearing experience before I came to Victoria.
Um and I have a feeling based on I know what motion you're gonna have, I thought maybe I could just illustrate a little bit some of the challenges so I could get some direction if I was going to be given a report.
So that's really where I was going with that.
So I can I can hold on to my motion, Mr.
Chair, yeah, if if Director Rosenberg wants to do that.
Certainly uh on the committee's behalf.
Uh we would uh like to hear from Director Rosenberg uh his overview of snow clearing prior to uh his worship's motion.
Great.
Thank you, Council Qualwage.
Uh can you bring up attachment one, please?
So this first attachment we're going to look at is basically um the blue is what we're currently clearing today.
Um, and the dotted blue, which is hard to see on there, but it is on there, is what we're clearing today.
Um that's really not our responsibility, but we do it anyways.
So um what we currently clear is about 7200 meters or just over seven kilometers of sidewalks in an event.
That includes transit, um, some hard to get to spots like uh backyards, like when people back onto the island highway and they're fenced and treed.
And for them to get to that, they'd have to drive out of their street and then park somewhere on island highway to shovel the sidewalk.
Um so it would just literally never get done.
So those dotted ones are um perhaps school board, CRD, our parks, um, transit, um, ministry areas, um, and then we got a couple just anomalies.
So that works out to about 7,200 kilometers, and we do that with four staff in the wintertime.
Um, those four staff are hand shoveling those transit spots mostly, and we're using two um tractors that are kind of geared up for snow removal.
They work, but they're not for snow removal.
In previous histories, it takes if you put a dedicated snow clearing machine that can be versatile for other things.
You can do about 10,000 meters with the machine and do it effectively, meaning that it doesn't take you three days.
You can get it done in an event.
So there's the yellow, which is basically just Helmkin, Watkiss, Island Highway, and a little bit of six mile.
If you wanted to do something like that, you'd be looking at um just over just under 10,000 meters.
So that would get you all the main stuff where you get the high profile, high volume pedestrians.
And then if you wanted to look at actually going into neighborhoods and doing all the neighborhoods, then you'd be looking at about another 8,700 meters.
So roughly 10 and 10.
A dedicated sidewalk machine will cost you about $100,000.
We could find other ways to use it.
And then on top of that, you probably on 10,000 extra meters, you're gonna look at another winter person.
It's just difficult for four people to do all those bus stops, do those other things.
We might be able to get away with one, we'd have to look at, but I would say at minimum for 10,000, you'd be one if you tried to do the whole match, it'd be two.
So those are just things to consider.
And obviously, if we're going to get into that direction, then you want to be able to do it in a timely fashion.
Other than that, I can answer any questions or give me some direction on a report and move forward.
Thank you, Director.
I I have some questions.
I'm gonna go to my colleagues first.
Uh Mary Screech.
So I guess my one, I mean, I agree that in in general in the past, when it snowed, if you know, if it snowed on say a Tuesday night when all the staff are here.
Our staff generally, the parks guys have done a pretty good job of doing the main sidewalks along here and some on Helmican.
But of course, what just happened was the snow started at the same time that everybody went on vacation.
Right.
So that's another complicating factor that I think we have to consider in the big scheme of things is what happens in that.
So that was part of why my motion was to report back on options.
But I mean, like, say if it started snowing like crazy on Friday afternoon this week at one in the afternoon, again, you've got because we don't have any real set system, and I mean, I know it's they're rare events, but I think it's fair to presume that they're going to be more frequent from here on in.
Um so then what would happen then?
But nothing would be shoveled until Monday morning.
So I guess that's my question is is the the time lags of when we have staff available at the moment to actually do it.
Yeah your worship I I I think that point's well taken I I I think there was um you know one is very heavy wet snow.
That's that's you know and it's a a significant amount um we had people actually booked on vacation but you know if in in this this this is on me um I may have misjudged the importance of getting to more than just the bus stops.
And we also take on more responsibility.
If you looked at that first attachment, you know, we're taking on almost 5,000 meters of work that others are actually responsible for that we do.
So we didn't get to that.
So to answer your question, the tough part is that, you know, we can bring people in off vacation and we've only got four people.
Yeah.
But we can't bring in a contractor.
I mean, what we'd pay to bring in a contractor who wouldn't have the staff either, because they're not going to staff.
If I said to them, I want you to dedicate two people to clear our sidewalks in the winter, if they actually could perform that service, it would be significant cost for what could happen.
If I said to them, just do your best, they would say, Oh, we called all our casuals, they weren't available because they're all in road machines doing roads.
So it really becomes a difficult task with regards to it's not very frequent for us to go out and do it.
But what we can do is, you know, hearing this message today at a minimum, um, we can make it a priority when we do have an event that over time is not an issue.
I mean, we go to time and a half after so many hours, we go to double time.
Um, and we do have the four you know, employees that come out and plow, you know, shovel snow and work on the equipment.
Um, you know, we could look at trying to do a casual hire or something like that.
And we always have lots of work to do.
Uh, you know, we can prune trees, there's other things that are coming up now.
So we could look at adding another winter staff that would help quite a bit.
And then, of course, like I say, that piece of equipment.
Um, if if you brought in an actual piece, I mean, they can do other things like flail mole, and they don't do those other things as well as our John Deere tractors take care of our grass really, really well, and they do an okay job of snow clearing.
If you bring in a snow clearing piece of equipment that will do a really, really good job of clearing snow, it will do an okay job doing other things like cutting grass, flail mowing, and so on.
So I truly think your best option would be to buy one dedicated machine that moves quickly in the area and has attachments like a snowblower.
And it's it's a robust snowblower when it's really wet and heavy snow.
And it's, you know, got a V blade and a uh uh straight blade and those other snow attachments that help quite a bit.
You can sand right off the back of it.
So it's got a sander right on the back of it.
So once you clear it, you can put down a little bit of sand or salt right behind it so that the sidewalks aren't slippery.
And that once the whole event's done, and then you start getting those freeze thaw, that piece of equipment can also put down that salt and sand to do all the sidewalks through town as it goes.
So it, you know, to me, that's the solution.
At a minimum, if you want to try to really improve your sidewalks, you look at an investment in that significant purchase of capital purchase of a dedicated snow clearing machine.
But if that's the kind of thing you'd like to entertain, I can bring back a report talking a little bit about the struggles about the labor, which I think is really the big struggle.
Um, but if you're talking about, you know, when it does happen, what's the best way to attack it?
I do think a dedicated snow machine.
Just expanding it like part of the difficulty, like we have this email from Mr.
Benuda, and I I understand his angst to a certain extent, but I don't see how we can actively work on enforcing the bylaw when we're not doing our own.
You man and also in this recent, and I'm not trying to dump on you because I mean I I think in general we the roads were great, and in general, when it snowed before when we have the staff, we've done a good job.
But the school board let us down, right?
The school board didn't do Viewer All Elementary on Helmican.
I don't think they did shoreline, I don't know that.
We do that, Your Worship.
Do we?
Yeah, yeah.
Uh we do the ministry lands, we do the CRD lands.
The Helmican overpass was deadly.
Right.
I mean, you really couldn't walk on that on the summer.
And we actually cleared that as well.
Yeah.
Again, not ours, but we do that because there's just some places that won't get done.
So it's a whole combination of things to me in many ways of how we up everybody's game, including our own, and enforcing the bylaw, which is and your worship, in no means am I taking this as a sight against the crew or the efforts we're making.
This is just what we're in.
And it's a difficult task if you're not, if it's not steady in other municipalities, they have all the equipment, they have all the staffing.
It's a 24-hour shift.
There's always employees available.
It's an e it's not easy.
It's still difficult, but it it at least you can plan for it and deal with it.
It's it's way easier.
In frequency here, it's a very difficult part of the equation.
Counselor Lemon was next.
Yeah, and and I think most of my concerns and questions have been addressed.
And thank you.
Um I I feel I'm reassured at the the stretch that I walk most often is Island Highway.
And there's stretch patches of that where that as the snow got wetter and wetter and more trampled and more trampled, and then froze and then thawed and then froze some more, and then it was black ice, and then people were walking on the on on the highway be, you know, and and it it was it was treacherous.
We have to hand salt and sand those.
We don't have a dedicated salting machine or sanding machine to do those.
So that that makes it very difficult.
Yeah, yeah.
So I just just a question, Directorus.
Would it be possible to have someone on duty to, you know?
100%.
I mean, that's just putting staff on alert, right?
They come in on on call.
I mean, we can't force employees to work overtime, but I can tell you we've got a dedicated staff that by all means, if they were called in, they'd come out.
Yeah, yeah.
And and and what you what you use right now, what the areas that you have been clearing, you've been using the uh this the same kind of tractor equipment that you use to do the lawns, right?
Yeah, exactly.
And and like all the sanding and salting is done with hand push.
Think of your lawn cedar spreaders, right?
But only a commercial size.
So when you're trying to do 8600 meters walking behind pushing it, that takes a lot of time as opposed to a dedicated snow machine that's built for sidewalks that can travel at like three miles an hour that can do the work of one man in almost an hour what he's going to do in a day.
Right?
Because it can just drop that material down.
But it's a significant expenditure for an infrequent event.
And that that's really what you have to kind of determine if if that's yeah, right.
That that truly is the big big cost is that one time purchase.
Well, you know, if you buy it, we buy it, we may it may never snow again.
But if we buy it, we can also lease it out.
Or it might snow twice a year.
Counselor Rogers.
Yeah, thank you.
Um one one of the uh, you know, first off, you know, uh I the guys that do the main roads, right?
You know, they they do a hell of a job.
You know, they're up and down and and they and they move fast and they're efficient.
And they put the snow right where I had, you know, removed.
And I think that was one of the complaints was you know, the snow plow comes in and puts back the snow that I moved out.
Um and I guess my question would be to to you.
If you're if we were doing the island highway, um, a snow plow comes in and throws all that snow for our snow machine to take what did our snow machine do?
Put it back in the road.
My first thing is you'll you'll notice I never call it snow clearing.
I always call it snow and ice control because you're not going to clear the snow away.
It stays.
You just move it around, you control it.
Right.
So in those particular instances, again, when you come back to that sidewalk machine, that dedicated machine, it does come back after the second trip when the plow goes by the second time.
He then pushes it back.
And you've got a blower that can aim it, right?
These blowers, I can literally put it in a pickup truck if I want.
I mean, some of the places where I've I've dealt with snow, we threw everything to the center of the road.
We had very narrow lanes, and then in at midnight, we'd come in with eight tandems and a massive snow blower that's the size that can chew up a car, and we'd blow all the snow right into a truck and truck it away.
That's what Canadians normally do that uh down here in the lower bay glass.
Um, so that's just part of winter.
And and with a dedicated sidewalk machine, you plow it once, plows go through, you come back and plow it the next day or later that afternoon.
Um, that's just part of the snow fighting game.
So the follow-up question we've got those two uh John Deere uh tractors, how much do they cost each?
Uh they're not cheap.
They're probably, I think the one was 40, and I think the other one was 80 plus attachments.
80.
The big one's 80, but that's that's our main uh grass cutting machine.
Right.
And then we just buy a snow attachment to go on it.
So it is a utility tracker, so to speak, but it its strength is in lawn care.
Uh so you know you could get one dedicated snow machine versus two that aren't the one dedicated snow machine would would by far um outwork the other two tractors uh significantly during winter.
And like I say, there are some ancillary other things.
There it's just the reverse of the John Deere tractor.
You can buy other attachments for it where it would perform fairly well, but not as well as the John Deere tractor.
So if the John Deere tractor broke down, you could put a piece on it.
But we likely wouldn't buy lawn attachments for it.
We might buy you know something to help out with sidewalks, because it's got a spreader on it.
So um we could do things like that for trail maintenance.
You could have a spreader so you could put the gravel down on the trail maintenance and then rake it out.
There's different things you can do with that, flail mowers for ditches where it would have an arm where it could reach down and over.
So we would find other uses for it.
It wouldn't just be for snow clearing.
Yeah.
And sorry, my last question, Sharon.
The um uh if I'm and I'd love to get copies of the two charts that you just provided, you know, if you could send that out to us, very useful.
Uh so if I understand things, there we're about 25 kilometers of sidewalks uh that you would identify that ideally we could clear.
And if we had it, if we had one of those removal machines, I didn't say clearing, and uh had one of those removal machines.
How long do you think that would take uh for a removal shooting to do?
25 kilometers.
Again, in in historically for me, and every snowfall's different, so this isn't a guarantee, but it's about 10,000 meters of effective service for a sidewalk machine.
Uh up in Salmon Arm, we had 40 kilometers and we did it with four machines.
And we generally would get you know fight through an event within a day.
Now that's a long day, that's not an eight-hour day, that's a 12, 14, depending on the event, 16-hour day, but we had four machines out at the same time while we were plowing roads and doing everything else.
That was a dedicated crew that did just sidewalks.
And that was a that was a discussion that council had back in the day, and we weren't originally doing it.
We were relying on homeowners to do their piece, and we're only doing like we're doing here, just key pieces of sidewalk, and they made the decision to to jump in with both feet.
We'd have anywhere from 20 to 40 events.
Now in Salmon Arm, we would get 20, 30 feet of snow a year.
That snow clearing budget could be 2 million a year.
Uh sometimes it's only four or 500,000, whereas our current budget, you know, is 100,000 for the roads plus.
And our sidewalk budget, you know, I would say range is in the $10,000 to $15,000 range labor-wise.
Very good information.
Thank you.
Counselor Matson, did you have any questions for Director Rosen?
Sure, a few questions and comments.
One of the questions for for later is uh is there any way we can, you know, get people to do more in terms of what they're supposed to do under the bylaw, although with that really heavy heavy snowfall, some of the really old people who live on Island High we wouldn't have been able to shovel that snow anyway.
In terms of just some general comments, um you know I think it's pretty much essential that we don't allow what happened this year to happen again.
And whether we have you know people on call we can call our just staff to work extra time.
It was really dangerous.
Even even today with uh you know I went out for a a little walk with the dog, and there were areas that I could barely walk up, and I had to hold uh uh hold on to a fence to sort of make my way up.
So uh I'm sure other people are having the same sort of concerns.
You know, with our community uh amenity contributions, uh if there ever was a an amenity the community needs is could be probably be that machine.
So I mean I have no problems at all uh spending a hundred thousand dollars or so to to purchase it if we can uh keep from happening this year in the future.
So those are probably my main comments, and I I I know staff can't uh yeah, the staff staff does what it can.
But one other question that's not so much sidewalks, but do we also have an issue in terms of cars parking on our little narrow roads and then having the snow snow removal trucks trying to sort of go around them to clean the streets?
And if that's the case, is do we have an option where we require people to move the move their vehicles or yes yes is the answer uh we we probably you know generally when we get a call from a resident saying my street wasn't plowed or the area in front of my house wasn't plowed nine times out of ten when Alex asks you know was there a car anywhere in the neighborhood they would say yes um and and you know we can't do anything about that you know we do get uh vehicles parked on the road sometimes um again in other places when this is a uh you know when it's happens all the time, you've got bylaws.
Okay.
My my one last question, and this is probably more for Jerry and John.
Uh would that machine be a be electric?
I think I've lost you all.
I can no longer hear you, so I'm assuming you can't hear me, so I'll I'll quit while I'm ahead of the I'm not sure.
And uh we're just we're to be honest, I we're just not as prepared as we could be uh because historically we haven't had to be prepared.
Uh it's very clear now that um our constituents want more planning, uh they want more action in regards to uh their sidewalks being cleared.
And just so you know, uh I personally received glowing reviews of the town's road from snow um clearing.
Uh just people are are very satisfied with that.
Uh there clearly is room for improvement on sidewalks.
Though from listening to you, Director and my colleagues, it looks like we've got two issues.
One is uh capital expense of a new piece of equipment, and the other is resourcing.
My question to you is uh and I don't want to get too far into the weeds into your uh your people management, but has there ever been any consideration for leave um uh for some kind of a uh uh leave restriction during the holidays?
No.
Uh not to my knowledge.
I mean, generally from a labor standpoint, it's pretty difficult to we always have somebody available, but to say to your entire crew, which is what we need in a snow event, that nobody can uh go away in case it snows, like people can't plan their holidays around.
Okay, you know, now we could come up with a policy that says nobody in the parks department is allowed to go on holidays for you know from December 1st to March 15th.
I don't know how many employees we'd have.
Uh and and I and I appreciate that, and and certainly i would never uh support something as extreme as that um my vision would be something like uh seniority based uh leave selection where there would be minimum staffing that we for consideration we we do have um okay minimum staffing limits but again once once you know again in this particular event we had two of five off but one's a supervisor that helps out but doesn't fight snow specific plus he's doing other things like taking care of town hall and doing some of these other things that they're ancillary to the snow fighting event, organizing contractors and so on.
So um, you know, it we because we have a small staff, it's tough to do those types of things.
In Salmon Arm, we had those kinds of things.
We ran 24-hour shifts, we had eight-hour shifts, three of them.
We ran them for four months.
Everybody ran staggered shifts.
We had supervisors at the same time because it was a known event that occurred often.
Yeah, so you put policies towards it.
This the infrequency is a killer here.
And and I would comment about the roads.
The reason you get glowing reports for the roads is because you pay for glowing service, right?
Right.
And that's why we get that.
This is the first place I've ever been in where we it's 50-50 complaints to compliments.
It's usually like a 99-one complaints to compliments.
So um you've paid for it.
So that's what you have to decide.
And and by all means, if if I I just wanted to bring up these points tonight to let you know what the struggles and challenges are.
But by all means if council wants to consider this, I'll put some more effort into it because again I haven't done this for a lot of a year.
So I know how to do it.
I don't know the cost of doing it.
The machines now might be 125.
Maybe we can get a used one you know I might be able to find a used one but with COVID a used vehicles seem to be tough to get but um you know I I just wanted council to know what the issues were if they wanted to move forward and and get some direction that's all can I just ask one quick question.
Certainly.
What was the population of Salmon Arm when 18,000?
Okay.
We were um extremely large geographically though.
Yeah.
Yeah, we we had some like roadwise, we we had more roads than lane kilometers in the city of Vancouver.
Yes, exactly.
Right.
Yeah.
Right.
Like Salmon Valley Road.
And a lot of topography that were issues as well.
Tough place to work.
Uh thank you.
Very uh robust discussion and summary of snow in View Royal and uh and other uh alternatives and uh recommendations.
Uh Mayor Screech, if you'd like to proceed.
Yeah, so I'm I'm happy to make a motion in in a sec, just after two things.
I mean, the one thing I would say, and I think staff knows this already.
I mean, for the infrequent amount that it snows here, I suspect we could make it worth our park staff while that they may even want to be on call to do snow removal.
We currently have one.
Just throw that out that that might be better than telling them they can't go away.
We currently have one that's on call.
Right.
Right.
24 hours a day every day.
But but in my motion, which will be just asking the staff to report back.
I mean, what I'm most concerned about is the main thoroughfares.
I'm not thinking that, for example, in Chilco, that we want to be doing all the sidewalks through there.
I'm thinking sort of Island Highway Hell, um, six mile road, the the main drags, and also working.
Admirals?
Admirals.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, I'm I'm thinking more the main thoroughfare fares right?
And so maybe we should get an idea if everyone agrees with that before I make the motion, rather than our neighborhoods.
Not that many of our neighborhoods have sidewalks.
Yeah yeah we look I agree I'd like to make the motion and okay well I I would just move the staff report back on options for sidewalk snow removals throughout the town in particular the main thoroughfares okay we have that motion on the floor would anyone like to second that I will second that okay seconded by councillor lemon for discussion uh mayor screech and with any more probably we've discussed it enough i mean I'd be just curious to see what what is out there I don't I don't think we're at the point where we can provide sidewalk removal right throughout the town into all the residential areas as well.
But I do think on the main drags with the bus stops, um, etc.
etc.
Okay, Councillor Lemon, you're in the secondary.
that we we need to look at that.
So I'm I'm comfortable with the motion.
Would you like to comment?
No, I'm I'm I think we've said what needs to be said.
Okay.
Uh do you have anything else, Councillor Rogers?
Um in speakers of the motion, I'd I'd be interested in in the main and the in the secondary.
Um I'm just a little um because I I think there are some secondary roads um that would be um still worthy of considering in an Aldersmith, for example, is a is an example.
You know, it's got a sidewalk to it and and it's acts so many uh individuals, you know, use that um uh for the townhouse accomplished.
Staff can use their discretion.
Right.
We're gonna hit a tipping point, right?
At some point, I'm gonna I'm going to say if you go over to this, you're probably looking at an extra staff person.
If you go to this, you're looking at you know, two extra staff people, right?
There'll be tipping points there that give you those numbers.
And um I can put something together to give you an estimation of what I think it'll be.
Um I just wanted to make sure you understood that there's no in for a penny here.
Yeah, it's the pound is a hundred thousand up front, and then it's the ongoing operational after that.
Right.
So that I just wanted to make sure you're aware of that.
And if council understands that that's the the route, then by all means uh I can put something together.
Yeah.
I just just uh one more, you know, I'm certainly supporting the motion.
Um uh if um in terms of you know active transportation and walkability and and getting to uh to bus stops and so forth and sh and shopping centers, uh I think it's it's a great idea.
It um the other aspect is it reduces injuries, keeps people out of hospitals, those slips and falls.
And uh I concur with uh councillor Masson a great use of CACs.
Councillor Madison, any closing comments?
No, I'm in agreement totally with all my colleagues.
Thanks.
Uh the only thing I would say is um I I I support the idea of uh the main thoroughfares being cleared first in a priority sequence.
And I I think uh Director Rosenberg kind of alluded to it, uh, almost like a tiered system where you know you're you're going to be showing us costs, you know, the main roads will be this.
If you want the secondary and then you know, yeah, tertiary, so on, so on, right?
And down to uh the sidewalks on a on a dead end street, for example, right?
Uh, because uh to you know, I the way I look at it, I think every resident, you know, there may be residents to go, hey, why not why not my sidewalk, right?
Like we're all we do all pay the same share of taxes, so at least this way you're showing what that's gonna look like.
And I and I've been very honest with with constituents when when this has been going on, and uh it does certainly doesn't take um a a director of engineering to say it's gonna cost more because I know it's gonna cost more.
Now you're the expert, you're gonna tell us exactly how much it's gonna cost but i was comfortable saying if we want these sidewalks cleared it's going to cost more it just is um so so there you go did you have one other comment no i i i think you you i just wanted to make sure you understood that this is not an easy solution yeah and you definitely gotta put a lot of money up front and then after that i i do think you're talking you know tens of thousands of dollars not hundreds of thousands again on an annual basis so definitely i'll give you uh a uh an improved what we're doing right now, just improving what we're doing.
I'll give you uh um expanding what we're doing and doing it better.
And then i'll give you if we want to do it all, here's the here's the cost.
Just before we do the phone.
Can we also?
I mean, I mean, like the school board, for example.
I mean, we should be writing to them and saying, hey, you know, this isn't good enough, and and to the Ministry of Highways.
And conversely, and I mean, I know this is a lot to have to do, but we should be writing to Eagle Creek Mall and saying, you know, you guys did an amazing job, and we just want to express our appreciation, which they did, and the hospital.
I mean, the hospital did all, at least I presume it was the hospital, because it was done regularly, um, right from the beginning.
Right.
So there were certain areas of town where they really excelled, and then others that sucked.
Ministry's a tough one.
I mean, I've I've had some arguments with them in meetings now.
Granted, I'm in with planners and and and you know, management as opposed to operations.
Um, but they keep saying they're changing their beliefs to multimodal, but they're not changing their operations to support multimodal.
And right now, ministry does not clear sidewalks.
That is that is walking, that's not cars, right?
Right.
So they don't do it.
Yeah, um, so that they're they don't clear their transit stops.
Um we do all of those, we do the bridge, we we do all of ministries, right?
It's not good enough.
Counselor Madsen.
It's in terms of the prior prioritization, uh particularly the streets where it's actually dangerous to you know walk on the road, for example, like in the harbor precinct, if we had sidewalks there, it's it's safe to walk on the streets because there's not a lot of traffic.
But there's there's other streets within town that if you uh you certainly put your life at risk if you you know walk off the sidewalk.
So like probably burnside would be another one too.
Materials and collectors as opposed to locals.
Councilor Rogers, a comment?
Yes, I I really like the idea of congratulating and thanking the people that did such a good job.
And I think the CID did a good job on the regional trail.
Is my right?
They did, yeah.
They the goose and the goose and especially the ENN trail, they did an amazing job.
So I definitely think we should thank those folks too.
Good point.
Yeah, okay.
Uh that sounds like it's everything.
Uh all in favor.
Opposed.
Uh motions carried.
Uh thank you.
And I'll hand the chair back to uh Mayor Screach.
Thank you.
And we'll go straight to question period.
Do we have any callers on the line, Steph?
Your worship, we do have a caller, and I suspect there may be another caller out there who um perhaps would like to try calling back in, but I would ask that caller to remain muted until you, your worship, uh asks him to unmute after I announce him.
So the caller that we have still on the line right now is 1090.
And uh and there may be one more if you would check back with me after this caller is through.
Thank you.
Thank you.
So caller with the last four digits 1090.
This is your opportunity to speak and press star six to unmute yourself and then give us your name and address for the record, please.
And this is question period.
All right.
Thank you, Mayor Screech.
It's M. Hankewich.
I'm um unit 76 on 14 Erskine Lane.
Um you listened to the the two presentations or looked at the two presentations, number five and and number 10.
Um I'll I'll just add comments.
I think we had these comments before when we we called in um be last year on on some of the developments.
Uh I I just wanted to clarify some things that were um said earlier in terms of what maybe we're concerned with.
And I won't speak for all the residents, I'll just speak for myself in this.
And and it was really, you know, the safety along Erskine, both like all for pedestrians for cyclists and for vehicles is is is what we're really concerned with.
And and so if that based on established standards, road standards, warrants having a sidewalk on both sides of the road, then great.
Have a have a sidewalk on both sides of the road.
I'm not gonna say it's it's imperative that it is on both sides, but there are standards I think that that should be maintained and and there are both in the town and and outside of that in terms of construction standards ac across the country.
So if it warrants it then it should be built I guess is the way I look at it.
In in terms of what we're what we have or what we experience right now in in terms of you know what's happening on on Erston Lane is the sight lines are challenging for us going in and out of our development and in terms of driving and and so the additional increase would only add to that risk, like with the traffic, the increase in vehicle traffic.
Um and the other concerns we have are emergency access, and um uh council Rogers brought it up in terms of alternate access, we're gonna be bringing in hundreds of units on this street, and and it's going to be adding a significant number of residents.
And um we're fortunate in the townhouse complex here that we have an alternate exit onto game road in an emergency situation, but the other developments will not on Earth skin.
And so if there's any issue that blocks that exit, EMS isn't getting out or or coming in.
Um, and so that's that's a large concern.
The other thing is in terms of the overall, and I'll say all regional impacts, but I specifically mean that like Helmican and Watkins and the Burnside intersection in terms of the vehicle load.
We did look at the traffic reports that were included in each one of the developments, and there's there is an impact to the and it basically drops it to the lowest level.
So it it has a an impact on on those intersections.
And overall, we haven't seen a commitment from the town in terms of CACs and improvements in the area to maintain the quality of life for the existing residents, but also for the new ones that are coming in.
And I think that's an important commitment that's that should be made to future residents and to the ones that are already here.
So and and some of those commitments could be developing along water because there is only a I I've allowed you a lot of leeway, sir.
This this is question period.
Right?
It's not really the comments come up front in a meeting under public participation.
So we we all understand your concerns, um, and there's going to be lots more opportunities on the two projects um that were before us tonight to make those comments as as they move through the process.
So, can I ask one question then?
For for the people in the area, is it possible for the town to supply information regarding the overall plan for the area from the intersection at Helmakin and Watkiss to the Burnside intersection with relation to all the developments and especially the overall plan for Erskine Lane?
I don't, you know, I I would encourage you to phone and speak with staff.
I I think that would be your best bet by far.
Um, I don't really know what you mean by the overall plan for the area.
Watkis way is a road that is is built, it's an overbuilt road.
Um, so I don't honestly, but but I I have to say as mayor that I I take a little bit of exception when someone suggests to me that I'm not concerned about the quality of life for future viewer all residents or current because anything is but the case.
The the town has pretty detailed plans.
We have a detailed official community plan.
Um we have a detailed transportation plan, and we work hard to uphold those values.
But if you have specific questions about transportation infrastructure, I would encourage you to call in or pop by town hall and speak to staff about those.
All right.
And as far as commitments in the area for the CACs, a reinvestment?
I I think when you called Forcer, we made it clear that there would be a great deal of public consult consultation before we decided how any of those funds were going to be spent.
Meetings about saying yes, you know what, we're gonna we're gonna engage in the areas, we're gonna make sure there's something there.
There hasn't there hasn't been any of that dialogue with the people in the area.
Well, A, I think every member of council has probably very specifically said that we want to make sure there's some sort of a public process before we spend CACs.
Um, and B, I think it's important to remember that CACs are for the broader community, they're not only for the very neighborhood or the very street upon which the development is taking place.
They're for the broader town of View Royal.
And yes, we will definitely, when we're spending those funds, everything comes before open meetings where people can participate.
Budget is all open, people can participate.
People can write to us at any time and suggest how they would like to see funds spent.
Lindsay may be able to assist as well.
If you wish.
Sorry.
Lindsay may be able to assist.
I think we're good.
I think I think we're we've well exceeded our two minutes.
Okay.
So thank you very much for your call, and we'll look forward to talking to you again in the future.
All right, thank you for the opportunity.
Staff, do we have any other callers on the line?
Yes, your worship.
We do have one more, 0174.
0174.
So caller with the last four digits, 0174.
This is your opportunity.
And I would remind people that this is question period, please.
So if you have a specific question about anything to do with the town, this is your opportunity.
So 0174, go ahead, please.
Press star six possibly to unmute yourself.
Are you there?
Caller with the last four digits, 0174.
Okay, well, I think we've lost them.
Do we have any other callers on the line, Steph?
No, your worship.
That's it for this evening.
Thank you.
Okay.
Thank you very much.
Thank you, Council, and the callers, and we need a motion to terminate.
Thank you, staff.
Thank you.
We'll see you all next week.