Form
SUSTAINABILITY CHECKLIST
A completed sustainability checklist for the rezoning and development at 241 Glenairlie Drive.
Applicant: Kyle PorterDate of Application: February 25, 2026Includes commitments to BC Energy Step Code Level 5 and zero carbon design
Department of Development Services
45 View Royal Ave Victoria, BC B9B 1A6 250-479-6800 planning@viewroyal.ca
Page 443–451
SUSTAINABILITY CHECKLIST
REZONING, DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE PERMIT APPLICATIONS
Name of Applicant: Kyle Porter Site Address: 241 Glenairlie Drive Legal Description: Lot 15 Section 3 Plan VIP6642 Esquimalt Land District Date of Application: February 25, 2026
Purpose of the Sustainability Checklist:
The checklist is intended to assist applicants to plan projects that further the sustainability objectives of the Town’s Official Community Plan (OCP) and Community Climate Action Strategy (CCAS).
How is the Sustainability Checklist Used?
The applicant must complete the sustainability checklist and submit with development application. Staff will review and evaluate the checklist for accuracy and completeness. The checklist will be attached to the staff report for Council’s consideration.
Who needs to submit a Sustainability Checklist?
Applicants are required to complete a Sustainability Checklist for the following types of applications:
- Rezoning
- Development Permit
- Development Variance Permit, if applicable.
Things to Note:
- Not all elements of the checklist may be applicable to all applications. If you think a particular question is not applicable, please explain.
- Statements such as “will consider” and “attempt to be” do not constitute a proposed outcome and are not acceptable. The statements must be realistic and propose attainable results.
- If you require further space, please feel free to attach additional information to this document.
Page 443–451
| SUSTAINABILITY CHECKLIST | Y | N | N/A | COMMENTS/EXPLAIN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth Management | ||||
| 1. Is the development located within the Town’s Urban Growth Boundary? | Y | |||
| 2. Is the development located within the prescribed Transit-Oriented Area in the Hospital neighbourhood? | N | |||
| 3. Is there adequate capacity to support the development? (e.g. water, sewer, transportation) | Y | |||
| 4. Does the development include measures to minimize site disturbances and changes to the existing topography and landscape features? | Y | New home designed to utilize existing grade and slope of lot to help minimize soil removal and blasting | ||
| Environmental Sustainability | ||||
| 5. Is the development sited to preserve environmentally sensitive areas, trees and greenspaces located on site and adjacent properties? How will the environmentally sensitive areas, greenspace and trees be protected? (i.e. covenant, land dedication, etc.) | Y | Actively working with members of the View Royal Climate Coalition on permeable landscape, bioswales and intelligent planting for urban canopy. | ||
| 6. If a waterfront development, is it compliant with the 15m setback from the natural boundary of the marine waterfront and shoreline areas, and the 30m setback from other watercourses? | N | |||
| 7. Does the development incorporate Dark Sky principles? (environmentally responsible outdoor lighting) | N | |||
| 8. Does the development prioritize tree retention, and the planting of native tree species? • How many trees need to be removed? • How many trees are being retained? • How many trees are being planted? |
Y | The site currently contains one oak tree, one large and one smaller mature maple on the side property line. An arborist assessment confirmed the two trees are very close together, likely share intermingling roots and a large hole has developed between them due to the large rotten maple leaning over. The large maple is a hazard that should be removed immediately. The smaller maple also may have compromised roots, shows movement at the base of the tree during a pull test with the weight of one person. It is the opinion of the arborist that the tree “poses more risk than the value it brings. The damage this individual could case falling on the neighbour’s property would likely outweigh the cost of removing, and replacing the tree altogether. This would create an opportunity for installing a better, longer living tree in soil uncontaminated by invasive Vines” The adjacent property owner shares interest in enhancing the property line through thoughtful replanting and beautification. Opportunity to improve species diversity, long-term canopy performance, and overall landscape quality relative to the existing condition. Replacement planting will meet or exceed municipal policy requirements (2:1 where applicable), with final quantities determined following arborist review. New plantings will prioritize climate-resilient native or regionally appropriate species and will be strategically located to maximize long-term canopy benefit and survivability. |
||
| 9. Does the development retain or enhance the urban forest? How does the development help mitigate the loss of tree cover? | Y | Replanting plan focused on strengthening the long-term urban forest. Replacement species will be selected for climate resilience, canopy potential, and suitability to site conditions. Planting locations are intentionally positioned to maximize future shading of hardscape areas and building facades to help mitigate heat gain over time. | ||
| 10. Does the development employ other water conserving measures that would promote the reuse of rainwater and water storage for irrigation? | Y | Permeable driveway and patios will keep water in the ground to reduce landscape watering needs and reduce the outflow to storm system | ||
| 11. Will site remediation, preservation or enhancement of the natural environment be part of the development process? | Y | Enhancement of existing is always a goal however this lot was previously rear lawn area and is largely cleared of any growth. | ||
| 12. Does your project face any unique site constraints that limit environmental sustainability achievement? | N | |||
| 13. How does your development intend to manage construction waste? (e.g. reuse of existing building or building materials during construction, recycling building materials during demolition, etc.) | Y | Built green principles of waste management, no large bins on site, all materials will be organized and recycled or disposed at hartland with individual trips. This has become a standard for my construction methods. | ||
| Climate Adaptation | ||||
| 14. Does the development include climate-sensitive design features to minimize the impacts of flooding, wildfire, wave action and erosion? (i.e. meet the setbacks from watercourses/shoreline, FireSmart principles, etc.) | N/A | |||
| 15. Does the development ensure the protection, preservation and/or restoration of aquatic habitats, riparian ecosystems or marine waterfronts? (for development near shorelines and watercourses) | N/A | |||
| 16. Does the development include any renewable energy generation such as solar electricity, wind power, or geothermal heating/cooling? | Y | This home will be BC Energy Step Code 5, high performance, net zero, solar ready and zero carbon. | ||
| 17. Does the development reduce the heat island effect on the site? | Y | Light coloured hardscaping materials, thoughtful species selection and planting location for tree canopy to reduce southern and western sun where possible | ||
| Sustainable Community Development | ||||
| 18. Does the development balance the scale and massing of buildings in relation to adjoining properties? Does the development enhance the adjacent neighbourhood? | Y | Careful consideration of neighbourhood character, massing, and existing home locations, views, and privacy during the design process | ||
| 19. Does the development incorporate any public and/or private amenities or space for public gatherings and activities? (e.g. public plazas, courtyards, community gardens, play areas, seating areas, childcare facilities, walking/bike trails, public art, public washrooms or drinking fountains, etc.) | N/A | |||
| 20. Does the development provide opportunities for aging in place or for people with disabilities? (e.g. wider door openings, reinforced walls in bathrooms for future installation of grab bars, ground-oriented entrances, etc.) | Y | In law suite provides no-step covered entry, 36” front door blocking in all bathrooms, all living on one level. Outdoor space and adjoining door to main home | ||
| 21. Does the development provide any accessible dwelling units? If yes, how many units? | N | |||
| 22. Does the development provide for a diversity of housing types and larger size units (i.e., 2- and 3-bedroom units)? If yes, how many units? | Y | 3-bedroom main home plus 1-bedroom suite which can be incorporated into main home for larger/growing or multigenerational families. | ||
| 23. Does the project provide rental housing? If yes, how many units? | Y | Suite fire separated and fully sound proofed which can be used for rental purposes or extended/growing family. | ||
| 24. Does the development provide below-market rental dwelling units or affordable home ownership? If yes, please indicate the total number of below-market units and the level of affordability. | N/A | |||
| 25. Does the development require the relocation of existing tenants? If yes, please review the Tenant Assistance Policy and identify how many tenants will need to be relocated. | N | |||
| 26. Does the development contain a mix of uses? (e.g. commercial and residential) | N | |||
| 27. Does the development incorporate Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles? | Y | Street-oriented building design, windows overlooking public areas, defined pedestrian access routes, exterior lighting at entries, clear delineation between public and private space. Landscaping and building placement are designed to maintain visibility and natural surveillance while avoiding concealed areas. | ||
| 28. Does the development provide enhanced waste diversion facilities? (e.g. on-site recycling, on-site composting) | Y | View Royal curbside garbage, organic waste and recycling pick up program (soft plastics please!) | ||
| 29. Does the development include efficient on-site stormwater management options? (e.g. permeable surface treatment, pervious parking pads, absorbent landscaping, etc.) | Y | On site storm water management system and permeable driveway and patios designs | ||
| 30. Do any of the existing buildings have heritage value? | N | |||
| 31. Has an archaeological site been identified at the project site? | N | |||
| 32. Does the design of the project help facilitate mental health, wellness and social connectedness? (i.e. semi-public gathering spaces, pet friendly areas, prioritization of pedestrians, etc.) | Y | Family neighbourhood, family friendly no through street with great walkability to bus routes, schools and parks. | ||
| 33. Does the development provide or designate spaces for growing food in private or common areas? | Y | Ample plating areas and on site expandable irrigation system to promote planting and food growing areas. | ||
| Sustainable Transportation | ||||
| 34. Is the development accessible by multiple modes of transport emphasizing walking, cycling and transit accessibility? | Y | Excellent location for access to walking/riding trails and frequent bus routes. | ||
| 35. Does the development provide car sharing programs or other car alternative transportation options? | N/A | |||
| 36. Does the development provide electric vehicle charging options? If yes, how many and please confirm if they are level 1, 2, and/or 3. | Y | One level 2 in main home garage and one level 2 from suite panel to exterior location | ||
| 37. Does the development include an interconnected road system? (e.g. modified grid, multiple street connections, short block lengths, limited cul-de-sacs) | N/A | |||
| 38. Are the streets connected with sidewalks and pathways? | N/A | |||
| 39. What is the walking distance to a public transit stop or hub? ☒ Less than 400 metres (1-4 minute walk) ☐ 400-800 metres (5-10 minute walk) ☐ 800-1200 metres (10-15 minute walk) ☐ 1200-2400 metres (15-30 minute walk) |
Y | Less than 400 meters to Island Highway bus stops going both directions. | ||
| 40. What is the distance to the nearest regional multi-use trail? (i.e. Galloping Goose and E&N Rail Trail) ☒ Less than 400 metres (1-4 minute walk) ☐ 400-800 metres (5-10 minute walk) ☐ 800-1200 metres (10-15 minute walk) ☐ 1200-2400 metres (15-30 minute walk) |
Y | 400 meters to Glenairlie park and access to E&N Rail Trail | ||
| Economic Sustainability | ||||
| 41. Does the development include a non-residential component? | N | |||
| 42. Will the development provide direct employment (i.e., on the development site) after the development is completed? | N/A | With the exception of home based businesses | ||
| 43. What is the development’s proximity to commercial centres and services? ☒ Less than 400 metres (1-4 minute walk) ☒ 400-800 metres (5-10 minute walk) ☐ 800-1200 metres (10-15 minute walk) ☐ 1200-2400 metres (15-30 minute walk) |
Y | Less than 400m to shops along Island Highway, Less than 800m to Helmcken/Island Highway | ||
| Engagement | ||||
| 44. Is a public information meeting planned for this development? | N | Direct discussion with local residents through email. For residents where no email contact was possible, letters were dropped with plans, letter to council and invitation to contact with any questions. Cell phone number and email provided. All residents of Glenairlie, Rudyard, Stormont, Suzanne, Brian, Abinger and Ardenlea (over 100) received a letter and/or email. | ||
| 45. Was the development modified as a result of public input? | Y | Yes, bioswale along frontage was requested and has been included in discussions with engineering. Other ideas such as use of permeable materials and carbon reduced design and construction strategies were also discussed and incorporated. |
Page 443–451
Document Images
(1)
Extracted from: 2026 07 07 Council Meeting - Agenda - Pdf(507 pages total)