Correspondence
Email from Jane Devonshire RE: #9 Erskine Lane
November 17, 2020Pages 373–3742 sections
A resident provides point-form feedback opposing the development due to the loss of mature Douglas fir forest and its impact on carbon sequestration and climate change.
June 15, 2020242 Glenairlie DriveClimate Emergency contextAdvocacy for forest preservation over parking lotsSuggestion for smaller building footprint
From: Jane Devonshire Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 5:36 PM To: Info Address info@viewroyal.ca Subject: RE: #9 Erskine Lane
Dear Mayor and Council,
Here are my thoughts on #9 Erskine Lane. Hope you don't mind that the format is in point form as I just jotted down my thoughts as they popped into my head:
Page 373–374
#9 Erskine Lane
- It just came to our attention in this week’s agenda about the application for rezoning of this rural property
- I feel that there are a lot of questions to be asked about it and that we have not had the opportunity for input
- Writing to express my deep concern that this precious forest full of Douglas firs will be virtually wiped out with this development, what about our Declaration of a Climate Emergency and looking at everything through the lens of climate change?
- We really need to start putting a monetary value on our valuable natural assets like they are doing in Nanaimo
- Cities around the world are scrambling to establish forest ecosystems and it is unconscionable that we should be raising this one to the ground to set up a parking lot, lawns and sprawling buildings
- In the long term this property may serve the community better as a forest with all its co-benefits rather than as a drain on our infrastructure
- The co-benefits of this are huge: healthy ecosystem, healthy planet, healthy people
- Covid-19 has been overwhelming for everyone but we must not lose sight of the fact that we are in a climate crisis
- We should be doing everything in our power to save these mature trees, this is zoned rural and should stay that way
- One mature tree is worth a thousand saplings in terms of carbon sequestration
- We need to be sequestering carbon and cleaning the particulates from the air that exacerbate respiratory illnesses like covid-19
- I can appreciate we need more affordable housing but if one has to build, let’s build smarter for the well-being of our residents rather than the well-being of the developers
- If there is to be any kind of development on this land it should have the smallest footprint as possible, build up for the condo building and down for the parking; no climate heating blacktop parking lots
- Decrease the number of required parking spots and give free bus passes to each unit for 6 months to a year; studies have shown that this has been very successful in getting people to change their habits and take transit
- Lawns too would be a huge drain on our water supply; keep as much natural forest intact as possible; forest bathing is good for the soul
- Victoria and other cities around the world are looking towards the future that is pedestrian focused and not car-centric
- Let’s make this a beautiful walking neighbourhood
- Would like to revisit the OCP and make sure we have a clear vision for View Royal that clearly defines sustainability and protection of our environment
- The OCP advocates for environmental protection of our tree canopies. Where is that reflected in this proposal???
- We would really appreciate the opportunity for more public input before this goes for a vote on rezoning
- Colwood Council is allowing public meetings and advisory committee meetings through a Zoom platform, why can’t we?
- Nelson uses a platform called the “Thought Exchange” for public input
- (https://www.thoughtexchange.com/)
- I sincerely hope council will hold off on their decision for rezoning
- The public needs more transparency and input
Respectfully yours, Jane Devonshire 242 Glenairlie Drive
Page 373–374
Extracted from: 2020 11 17 Public Hearing - Agenda - Pdf