This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Public Hearing/Documents

Meeting Documents

November 17, 20201 PDF103 documents extracted

2020 11 17 Public Hearing - Agenda - Pdf

Other

Public Hearing November 17, 2020 Notice of Advertising

A statutory notice detailing the advertising and mailing process for the public hearing regarding the rezoning of 9 Erskine Lane.

Page 64 key facts
Staff Report

Public Hearing Report - Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014, Amendment Bylaw No. 1059, 2020 to Rezone 9 Erskine Lane to CD-25: Erskine Lane Residential

Staff report from the Community Planner recommending council receive the report regarding a 336-unit multi-family rental development proposal.

Pages 7–237 key facts
Appendix

Attachment 1: Subject Property Map - 9 Erskine Lane

A cadastral map showing the location and boundaries of 9 Erskine Lane and its proximity to Hospital Way and Watkiss Way.

Page 242 key facts
Correspondence

Attachment 3: WestUrban Developments Ltd. Cover Letter - Re: Rezoning Application for 9 Erskine Lane

A letter from the applicant detailing significant changes to the development proposal, including moving parking underground to increase tree retention.

Pages 25–335 key facts
Appendix

Attachment 1 – Development Permit Area: Mixed Residential Guidelines Table

A compliance table evaluating how the proposed development at 9 Erskine Lane meets the Official Community Plan's Mixed Residential guidelines.

Pages 34–383 key facts
Appendix

Attachment 4: Topographic Plan – Undated

A technical survey drawing showing the land contours and elevations of the property at 9 Erskine Lane.

Page 392 key facts
Presentation

Attachment 5: Site Plans and Elevations – Thuja Architecture and Design – August 2020

Architectural drawing set for the 'Erskine Multifamily' project, featuring site plans, parkade layouts, floor plans, and building elevations.

Pages 40–476 key facts
Appendix

ERSKINE MULTIFAMILY - SITE SECTIONS (PR9)

Architectural site section drawings illustrating the building elevations and slopes for the proposed Erskine Multifamily project.

Page 484 key facts
Appendix

ERSKINE MULTIFAMILY - PROPOSED MATERIALS (PR10)

Visual guide specifying the exterior building materials, including fiber cement panels, concrete, and asphalt shingles.

Page 494 key facts
Appendix

Conceptual Landscape Plan (L1)

Overall conceptual landscape layout for the Erskine Lane project, detailing proposed plantings, pathways, and common areas.

Page 504 key facts
Appendix

Landscape Plan West Site (L3)

Detailed landscape design plan specifically for the western portion of the development site containing Buildings A and B.

Page 513 key facts
Appendix

Landscape Plan East Site (L4)

Detailed landscape design plan specifically for the eastern portion of the development site containing Buildings C and D.

Page 523 key facts
Appendix

Tree Inventory Report - 9 Erskine Lane, Victoria

Professional arborist's report detailing the species, size (DBH), and identification numbers for 1,092 trees located on the property.

Pages 53–676 key facts
Appendix

Tree Management Plan (L2)

Graphical plan illustrating the proposed tree retention and removal strategy for the site development.

Page 685 key facts
Staff Report

Environmental Overview - 9 Erskine Lane, View Royal BC (PID 002-364-531)

An environmental assessment report by EDI Environmental Dynamics Inc. evaluating the ecological impact of a proposed 372-unit apartment development.

Pages 69–745 key facts
Appendix

Environmental Overview Site Plan - 9 Erskine Lane, View Royal BC

A map showing terrestrial ecosystems and the proposed development footprint for the 9 Erskine Lane project.

Page 753 key facts
Appendix

Environmental Overview Photos - 9 Erskine Lane

A collection of 44 photographs documenting the existing conditions, vegetation, and wildlife features of the 9 Erskine Lane site.

Pages 76–863 key facts
Correspondence

Environmental Opinion Letter – 9 Erskine Lane – View Royal BC

A professional opinion letter from Cascadia Biological Services regarding whether roadside ditches meet fish habitat definitions under RAPR legislation.

Pages 87–883 key facts
Appendix

Cascadia Attachment I – Overview Map of the Property

An aerial overview map defining the study area polygon for the Cascadia biological assessment.

Page 892 key facts
Appendix

Cascadia Attachment II – Overview Map of the Property with Ditches

A cadastral map identifying the specific ditches assessed along the west and southwestern flanks of the property.

Page 902 key facts
Appendix

Cascadia Attachment III – Typical Site Photographs

Photographs showing the wetted depressions/ditches on the western and southwestern flanks of the property.

Pages 91–922 key facts
Correspondence

Memorandum: 9 Erskine Lane – Technical Design Brief dated October 9, 2019

A memo from Islander Engineering confirming that a previous technical report remains valid for a lower-density revision of the development plan.

Page 933 key facts
Staff Report

Technical Design Brief - 9 Erskine Lane View Royal, BC Multi Family Residential Development

A comprehensive engineering report covering water servicing, fire flow, sanitary sewer, and storm water management for the proposed development.

Pages 94–1054 key facts
Appendix

Appendix A: Site Plan - Figure 1

The proposed architectural site plan showing building locations (Buildings A, B, C, D) and parking layout for the project.

Pages 106–1073 key facts
Appendix

Appendix B: Water Network – Figure 2 and FUS Calculations

An engineering drawing of the proposed water network upgrades and hydrant locations for the site.

Pages 108–1092 key facts
Appendix

Water Supply for Public Fire Protection - Building A

Detailed fire flow requirement calculations for Building A based on Fire Underwriters Survey (FUS) standards.

Page 1103 key facts
Appendix

Water Supply for Public Fire Protection - Building B

Detailed fire flow requirement calculations for Building B based on Fire Underwriters Survey (FUS) standards.

Page 1113 key facts
Appendix

WATER SUPPLY FOR PUBLIC FIRE PROTECTION - Building C

Technical calculation sheet for fire flow requirements for Building C of the 9 Erskine Lane development.

Page 1124 key facts
Appendix

WATER SUPPLY FOR PUBLIC FIRE PROTECTION - Building D

Technical calculation sheet for fire flow requirements for Building D of the 9 Erskine Lane development.

Page 1134 key facts
Appendix

APPENDIX C - OFFSITE SANITARY SEWER - FIGURE 3 AND SANITARY SEWER CAPACITY ASSESSMENT

A capacity assessment and corresponding site figure for the offsite sanitary sewer system serving 9 Erskine Lane.

Pages 114–1174 key facts
Appendix

APPENDIX D - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT - FIGURE 4

Stormwater management site plan illustrating existing and proposed flow directions for the development.

Pages 118–1193 key facts
Staff Report

9 ERSKINE LANE DEVELOPMENT - Traffic Impact Assessment

Comprehensive traffic study by WATT Consulting Group evaluating current and future traffic conditions for the proposed residential development.

Pages 120–1545 key facts
Staff Report

Environmental Risk Information Services Report

A comprehensive environmental database report for 9 Erskine Lane, assessing historical records and potential environmental liabilities associated with the site.

Pages 198–2325 key facts
Appendix

Appendix IV: Qualifications of Assessor

Professional qualifications and biography for Jessica Pagotto, Senior Project Coordinator at Pinchin Ltd., who conducted the environmental assessment.

Pages 233–2342 key facts
Appendix

Appendix V: Photographs

Site photographs documenting current conditions at 9 Erskine Lane, including building elevations, heating oil tanks, and surrounding properties.

Pages 235–2393 key facts
Staff Report

RYZUK GEOTECHNICAL - Proposed 5 to 6 Story Building 9 Erskine Lane, View Royal, BC

A geotechnical engineering letter summarizing the results of site reconnaissance and preliminary assessments for the proposed multi-family residential development.

Page 2404 key facts
Staff Report

Geotechnical Assessment and Recommendations - 9 Erskine Lane

A technical report by Ryzuk Geotechnical assessing subsurface conditions, seismic considerations, and excavation requirements for a proposed multi-story building at 9 Erskine Lane.

Pages 241–2475 key facts
Appendix

Appendix: Location Plan

An aerial site location plan showing the subject property boundaries and existing geotechnical features such as rock walls and slopes.

Page 2484 key facts
Appendix

Appendix: Ryzuk Geotechnical Terms of Engagement

Standard terms and conditions governing the professional geotechnical services agreement for the project at 9 Erskine Lane.

Pages 249–2502 key facts
Appendix

Appendix: Proposed Road Layout

Engineering drawing detail for the proposed road layout and building footprints (Buildings A through D) for the rezoning application.

Page 2515 key facts
Appendix

Appendix: CD-25: Erskine Lane Residential Zone Table

Technical zone specifications for the proposed CD-25 Comprehensive Development zone, detailing density, height, and setbacks.

Page 2524 key facts
Appendix

Appendix: Schedule A Zoning Map

Visual schedule identifying the proposed Subzone A and Subzone B boundaries for the subject property at 9 Erskine Lane.

Page 2532 key facts
Presentation

Staff Presentation - REZONING 2020/05 - 9 Erskine Lane

Municipal staff presentation providing an overview of the 336-unit rental development proposal, community amenity contributions, and project changes since the previous application.

Pages 254–2776 key facts
Bylaw

TOWN OF VIEW ROYAL BYLAW NO. 1059

A bylaw to amend the Town of View Royal Zoning Bylaw to create the CD-25 zone and rezone 9 Erskine Lane for residential development.

Pages 278–2803 key facts
Correspondence

Correspondence: Letter from WestUrban Developments Re: Right of First Refusal

Developer correspondence offering the Town right of first refusal for up to three affordable rental units specifically for volunteer firefighters.

Page 2813 key facts
Correspondence

Correspondence: Email from Glenda Warren Re: 9 Erskine Lane

Correspondence and support letters from community members advocating for the approval of the 9 Erskine Lane rental development.

Pages 282–2834 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated November 12, 2020 from G. Adams, 9 Erskine Lane, Re: 9 Erskine Lane - Westurban Developments

A collection of form letters and signatures from residents expressing support for the multi-family apartment development at 9 Erskine Lane.

Pages 284–2984 key facts
Correspondence

Letter received October 29, 2020 from J. Adams, Re: Proposed Development - 9 Erskine Lane

Letter from Joanne Adams in support of the Westurban plans, citing benefits like green space, playground, and road widening.

Page 2994 key facts
Correspondence

Letter dated October 28, 2020 from J. Adams, Re: Proposed Development - 9 Erskine Lane

Letter from John Adams expressing support for the 9 Erskine Lane development as a way to enhance the area with safety measures like sidewalks.

Page 3004 key facts
Correspondence

Letter dated October 19, 2020 from G. Adams, Re: Westurban Developments’ Application – 9 Erskine Lane

Letter from Gordon Adams supporting the development, noting that Westurban has listened to concerns and reduced the building envelope.

Page 3014 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated October 16, 2020 from M. Hankewich, Subject: 9 Erskine Lane Open House and feedback

Feedback from a resident attendee of the Westurban open house, noting positive highlights but remaining concerned about density.

Page 3024 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated October 14, 2020 from E. Korol, Subject: #9 Erskine Lane

Email from Ethel Korol opposing the project, stating it is 'just too big for this property' and will negatively impact her unit.

Page 3034 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated September 21, 2020 from K. Gilbert, Subject: #9 Erskine Lane

Letter from Kathleen Gilbert suggesting further improvements such as reducing buildings to 4 stories and adding an entrance off Watkiss Way.

Page 3044 key facts
Staff Report

9 Erskine Lane Development Traffic Impact Assessment - 10.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

Recommendations from the Traffic Impact Assessment for the 9 Erskine Lane development by Watt Consulting Group.

Page 3055 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated September 18, 2020 from M. Niven, Re: 9 Erskine Lane Development

Email from Marion Niven and Matthew Flynn raising concerns about mature tree removal and the height of proposed 5-story buildings.

Page 3054 key facts
Appendix

APPENDIX A: SYNCHRO BACKGROUND

Appendix A of the Traffic Impact Assessment detailing the Synchro modelling software and Level of Service (LOS) criteria used in traffic analysis.

Pages 306–3072 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated September 15, 2020 from JOCELYN SKRLAC, Subject: Town of View Royal - COW Meeting, Sept. 15, 2020

Email regarding climate change and the pandemic as reasons for a more rigorous review of development proposals like 9 Erskine Lane.

Page 3103 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated September 15, 2020 from mrs linda jeaurond, Subject: COW

Request to delay the rezoning of 9 Erskine Lane until a satisfactory tree retention plan is presented.

Page 3113 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated September 14, 2020 from K. Gilbert, Subject: petition re #9 Erskine lane

Email submitting a petition signed by 135 residents stipulating specific requirements for any development on Erskine Lane, including a 30m tree border.

Pages 312–3245 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated September 14, 2020 from Andrew Engelhardt, Subject: Concerns regarding proposed development at 9 Erskine Lane

Letter from residents outlining concerns regarding traffic volume, environmental impact, and strain on local schools.

Page 3254 key facts
Correspondence

Letter dated September 14, 2020 from G. Warren-Adams, Re: Westurban Developments - 9 Erskine Lane

Letter from a Realtor supporting the project, highlighting fiscal sustainability and community growth within the Hospital Neighbourhood Centre.

Page 3264 key facts
Correspondence

Letter dated September 14, 2020 from G. Warren-Adams, Re: Proposed Development - 9 Erskine Lane

Letter from Glenda Warren-Adams expressing strong support for the development, highlighting its alignment with the Official Community Plan and the need for diverse housing options.

Pages 327–3284 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated September 14, 2020 from G. Balkan, Re: 9 Erskine Lane

Email from Glenda Balkan expressing concern about traffic disruptions and congestion resulting from the development.

Page 3293 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated September 13, 2020 from J. Hyndman, Re: Proposed development at 9 Erskine Lane

Detailed email from Jilly Hyndman outlining concerns regarding resident safety, parking shortages, privacy loss, and the environmental impact on mature trees.

Pages 330–3314 key facts
Correspondence

Letter dated September 13, 2020 from D. Lamoureux, Re: 9 Erskine Lane Proposed Apartment Development

Letter from Dustin Lamoureux expressing support for the 336-unit apartment development, citing its contribution to housing and the municipal tax base.

Page 3323 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated September 13, 2020 from Toni Garrett, Subject: Application for development at #9 Erskine Lane

Email expressing concerns about increased traffic volume and the preservation of trees in the neighborhood.

Page 3333 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated September 12, 2020 from Gray Daniels, Subject: Concerns over the development of #9 Erskine Lane

Email urging Council to work with developers to integrate concerns about the natural environment, safety, and amenities into the proposal.

Page 3342 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated September 12, 2020 from Kathleen Gilbert, Subject: #9 Erskine Lane

Email from Kathleen and Larry Gilbert requesting safety infrastructure like sidewalks and traffic control on Watkiss at Erskine before permits are granted.

Page 3353 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated September 11, 2020 from Roger Champagne, Subject: #9 Erskine Lane

Short email from Roger Champagne urging Council to listen to neighbourhood concerns when deliberating the development.

Page 3362 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated September 11, 2020 from Jessica Cameron, Subject: Concerns 9 erskine lane

Email from Jessica Cameron urging Council to prioritize the safety of current residents before making decisions on new developments.

Page 3372 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated September 9, 2020 from Marion Niven, Subject: 9 Erskine Lane Development.

Email from Marion Niven and Matt Flynn opposing the project due to building height, density, and anticipated traffic congestion.

Page 3383 key facts
Correspondence

Letter dated September 8, 2020 from the Adams Family, Re: Westurban Developments’ Application – 9 Erskine Lane

Support letter from the Adams family, former long-time residents and owners of the property, endorsing Westurban's proposal as a community-minded project.

Pages 339–3404 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated September 7, 2020 from Robert Clarke, Subject: 9 Erskine Lane development.

Email from Robert and Judith Clarke opposing the project because it has too many buildings and units for the small area, which will increase traffic and displace local flora.

Page 3413 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated September 4, 2020 from Len M, Subject: Committee of the Whole Meeting 2020-09-15 Re: 9 Erskine Lane

Email from Leonard J. Meilleur suggesting that proper sidewalks, linkage to the Galloping Goose Trail, and traffic control systems should be part of the development's infrastructure requirements.

Page 3423 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated September 2, 2020 from Chris Stewart, Subject: Council and Committee Information - View Royal Website - Contact Us Form

Email from Chris and Nancy Stewart raising concerns about clear-cutting mature forest, the need for multi-level underground parking to preserve trees, and traffic impacts of the proposed 370 units.

Pages 343–3443 key facts
Appendix

APPENDIX II - BC MOECCS Water Resource Atlas Search Result

Appendix II of the Phase I ESA showing search results from the BC Water Resource Atlas well database.

Pages 344–3451 key fact
Correspondence

Email dated September 1, 2020 from Clayton Hiles, Subject: 9 Erskine Lane

Input from Clayton Hiles and Dawn Woods focusing on pedestrian safety during construction, acute parking problems, and concerns about building height (5-6 stories).

Pages 345–3464 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated September 2, 2020 from Mary jane Rose, Subject: 9 Erskine Lane

Email from business owner MaryJane Rose opposing the 'clear cutting' of mature trees and Garry Oaks to make way for a building that is too large for the site.

Page 3472 key facts
Correspondence

Letter dated August 29, 2020 from Gordon Barnes, Re: Proposed development at #9 Erskine Ln.

Letter from Gordon Barnes stating that the proposed high-density development is extremely disruptive and does not fit the character of North View Royal.

Page 3482 key facts
Correspondence

Letter dated August 28, 2020 from Sylvia & Robin May, re: Development site at #9 Erskine Lane

Letter expressing concerns about pedestrian and cyclist safety, the need for a controlled intersection at Watkiss Way & Erskine Lane, and a required community playground.

Pages 349–3503 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated August 28, 2020 from Carol A. Kitson, Subject: Re: #9 Erskine

Email from Strata President Carol Kitson advocating for sidewalks to be installed before work begins and suggesting townhouses would be more appropriate for the area.

Page 3512 key facts
Appendix

Map Attachment: Erskine Lane Properties

An aerial map showing Erskine Lane properties and the Galloping Goose Trail, attached to Carol Kitson's email.

Page 3522 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated July 21, 2020 from JOCELYN SKRLAC, Subject: Agenda Item - tonight’s meeting

Email from Jocelyn Skrlac opposing the wholesale removal of trees and arguing that replanting does not replace the destroyed ecosystem.

Pages 353–3543 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated July 21, 2020 from Jane Devonshire, Subject: #9 Erskine Lane

Email from Jane Devonshire on behalf of the VRCC expressing concern about urban canopy loss and requesting higher tree protection standards.

Pages 355–3563 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated July 21, 2020 from Linda Jeaurond, Subject: 9 Erskine Lane

Thread including Jeaurond's request to delay rezoning for tree retention and a reply from Elena Bolster regarding a previous rezoning application (2020/02).

Pages 357–3594 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated July 21, 2020 from Marc Cittone, Subject: 9 Erskine Lane

Email expressing concern that the amount of parking proposed is inconsistent with a development near transit and contributes to excessive tree loss.

Page 3602 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated July 21, 2020 from IMBrown, Subject: #9 Erskine Lane

Ian D. Brown strongly objects to the rezoning, emphasizing the loss of carbon sequestration provided by the existing urban forest.

Page 3613 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated July 20, 2020 from Kenneth Smith, Subject: Erskine lane

Supportive email from Dr. Kenneth Smith stating the development will provide needed rental housing for hospital staff and the community.

Page 3622 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated July 19, 2020 from Lorraine Liwiski, Subject: 9 Erskine Lane - development proposal

Email stating disagreement with the development's density and height, lamenting the expected loss of natural forest area.

Page 3632 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated June 15, 2020 from Kathleen Gilbert, Subject: Re: #7 & #9 Erskine

Email expressing concern that public consultation is being restricted due to COVID-19 and requesting virtual meeting options.

Page 3642 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated June 14, 2020 from Jessica Cameron, Subject: #9 erskine lane

Email requesting the item be moved off the agenda until the public can be present and highlighting child safety concerns near the school.

Page 3651 key fact
Correspondence

Email dated June 13, 2020 from Sylvia May, Subject: #9 Erskine Lane Development

Email expressing concern that the development could proceed without adequate public input due to the COVID-19 situation.

Page 3662 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated June 13, 2020 from Carol A. Kitson, Subject: Re: Proposed Development @ #7 & #9 Erskine Lane

Email from Carol Kitson inquiring about Zoom attendance for meetings and reiterating concerns about the lack of sidewalks on both sides of Erskine Lane.

Page 3673 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated June 16, 2020 from Linda Jeaurond, Subject: 9 Erskine Lane

Email from Linda Jeaurond asking Council to hold off on rezoning until more public input is possible during the pandemic.

Page 3682 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated June 16, 2020 from JOCELYN SKRLAC, Subject: Rezoning of #9 Erskine Rd rural property

Plea to delay the rezoning to prevent the 'annihilation' of old growth trees and natural habitat.

Page 3692 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Dave & Hazel Eliason re: Erskine Lane #9

Residents express concerns regarding the lack of public input for the 9 Erskine Lane development and highlight the need for infrastructure improvements like sidewalks and traffic lights.

Page 3704 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Myrna Soutar re: Rezoning application for #9 Erskine Lane

Letter from residents opposing the virtual meeting format and raising concerns about traffic safety, forest loss, and the impact of densification on the surrounding community.

Pages 371–3725 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Jane Devonshire RE: #9 Erskine Lane

A resident provides point-form feedback opposing the development due to the loss of mature Douglas fir forest and its impact on carbon sequestration and climate change.

Pages 373–3745 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Lorraine Liwiski re: 9 Erskine Lane

A brief correspondence expressing disappointment over the loss of urban forest in favor of building development at the site.

Page 3752 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Dustin Lamoureux re: Comments for Nov 17 Public Hearing. - 9 Erskine Lane

A neighboring property owner writes in support of the rezoning, citing the need for housing inventory and the project's alignment with the Official Community Plan.

Page 3763 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Ian D. Brown re: public hearing November 17

An environmentalist argues against the rezoning by quantifying the loss of greenhouse gas absorption resulting from the proposed clearcutting of forest on the property.

Page 3774 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Paul Mantell re: #9 Erskine Lane Development

Neighbors express support for the development, noting the professional conduct of the developers and their willingness to engage the community.

Page 3783 key facts
Correspondence

Letter from Angela Provost re: Zoning of #9 Erskine Lane

Residents oppose the scale of the proposed four apartment buildings, suggesting that townhouses would be more appropriate for the location's character and traffic capacity.

Page 3794 key facts