This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Public Hearing/Documents/Email dated May 11, 2020 from C. Pacheco, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development
Correspondence

Email dated May 11, 2020 from C. Pacheco, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

June 16, 2020Page 4031 section

Cynthia Pacheco opposes the project, citing concerns about stress on a 'maxed out' intersection and two-lane country roads.

5.a Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014, Amendment Bylaw No. 1050, 2020
May 11, 202015 Helmcken Road, unit 21Opposes the 4-building construction plan

Invictus Proposed Development

From: Cynthia Pacheco
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 6:45 AM
To: Mayor And Council Email mayorandcouncil@viewroyal.ca
Subject: Invictus Proposed Development

Dear Mr. Screech,

I am a resident of View Royal in particular a Northern Gateway Corridor neighborhood resident (15 Helmcken Road, unit 21) and I would like it on record that I am very opposed to the development proposal put forth by Invictus Commercial Investment Corp for the property located at Helmcken Road and Burnside Road.

I am very concerned about the proposed development plan as it will put additional stress on an already unbelievably busy intersection. I’m not against development in general but not when the foundation isn’t in place to be able to handle the effects of such a large development on an already maxed out area. Invictus’s plan is to construct 4 buildings and attempt to transform a minimally populated corner into a densely populated one. Something a two lane country road can not sustain.

Please consider the effects of this large development plan on the neighborhood when reviewing their plans.

Thank you for you time.

Cynthia Pacheco

Sent from my iPhone

Page 403
Extracted from: 2020 06 16 Public Hearing Agenda - Agenda - Pdf