This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Public Hearing/Documents

Meeting Documents

June 16, 20201 PDF173 documents extracted

2020 06 16 Public Hearing Agenda - Agenda - Pdf

Other

NOTICE OF ADVERTISING - PUBLIC HEARING JUNE 16, 2020

A certificate of advertising confirming that the public hearing notice was posted on the town board, website, and mailed to nearby residents.

Page 84 key facts
Staff Report

STAFF REPORT: REZONING – 3, 5 and 9 Helmcken Road and 1449 Burnside Road West (Eagles Nest)

A staff report from the Community Planner providing analysis and recommendations for the proposed 247-unit 'Eagles Nest' apartment development.

Pages 9–245 key facts
Appendix

Attachment 1: Subject Property Map

Cadastral map highlighting the subject property boundaries at the corner of Helmcken Road and Burnside Road West.

Page 251 key fact
Appendix

Attachment 2: Subject Property Orthophoto

Aerial photograph with boundary overlays of the subject property development site.

Page 261 key fact
Presentation

Attachment 3: EAGLES NEST Rezoning Application Submission Summary Document

A design and planning rationale document submitted by the applicant detailing the project objectives, community engagement history, and site evolution.

Pages 27–374 key facts
Presentation

Eagles Nest Proposed Development Plan & Site Evolution

A presentation/report section detailing the evolution of the site plan based on community input, including statistics, renderings, and project timelines.

Pages 38–496 key facts
Appendix

Project Information - Eagle Nest Residences (Sheet A001)

Technical architectural sheet providing project data, building code summaries, legal descriptions, and unit mix summaries.

Page 505 key facts
Appendix

Architectural Site Plan (Sheet A201)

Detailed architectural site plan showing building footprints for Buildings 1, 2, and 3, including setbacks and fire access lanes.

Page 513 key facts
Appendix

P1/Level 0 Plan (Sheet A202)

Architectural floor plan for the parkade (P1) and Level 0, including residential units in Building 2 and utility rooms.

Page 523 key facts
Appendix

Level 1 Plan (Sheet A203)

Architectural floor plan for the first floor of the complex, showing unit distribution across all three buildings.

Page 534 key facts
Appendix

Level 2 & 3 Plan

Architectural floor plan for the second and third levels of the proposed Eagle Nest Residences.

Page 543 key facts
Appendix

Level 4 Plan

Architectural floor plan for the fourth level of the proposed development.

Page 552 key facts
Appendix

Level 5 Plan

Architectural floor plan for the fifth level of the proposed development.

Page 562 key facts
Appendix

Level 6 Plan

Architectural floor plan for the sixth level of the proposed development.

Page 572 key facts
Appendix

Unit Plans

Floor plan layouts for various unit types ranging from 1-bedroom to 3-bedroom configurations.

Page 582 key facts
Appendix

Section

Cross-sectional drawing showing the building heights and underground parkade levels.

Page 593 key facts
Appendix

Site Analysis Diagram

Diagram showing the project site location relative to Eagle Creek Village and neighboring developments.

Page 603 key facts
Appendix

Perspectives

3D perspective renderings of the proposed Eagle Nest Residences from several street vantage points.

Page 612 key facts
Appendix

Perspective Rendering

Artistic renderings and conceptual sections showing the site's public realm and internal courtyard.

Page 622 key facts
Appendix

SITE PLAN

Detailed engineering site plan including building footprints, woonerf area, and community green space.

Page 633 key facts
Appendix

Landscape Materials

Landscape plan detailing vegetation retention, shrub planting areas, and pedestrian pathways.

Page 643 key facts
Appendix

Landscape Sections

Cross-sections illustrating the relationship between the buildings, landscaping, and adjacent streets.

Page 653 key facts
Appendix

TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PLAN OF 3 HELMCKEN ROAD

A technical survey document showing existing topography, structures, and utility invert elevations.

Page 663 key facts
Correspondence

RE: Helmcken Road Rezoning Application (#3, #5, Lot 10, and 1449 Burnside Rd W.)

Rationale letter from the architect detailing the project redesign, unit counts, and responses to neighbor feedback.

Pages 67–694 key facts
Appendix

EAGLES NEST Rezoning Application Community Engagement Summary

A comprehensive report summarizing the results of community workshops and meetings held to discuss the development.

Pages 70–843 key facts
Appendix

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN for Eagle Nest Residences

Title page and Table of Contents for the project's stormwater management strategies.

Pages 85–863 key facts
Appendix

Storm Water Management Plan

A technical report prepared by McElhanney Consulting Services Ltd. to support the rezoning application by outlining surface drainage conditions and management strategies.

Pages 87–944 key facts
Appendix

EAGLE NEST DEVELOPMENT Traffic Impact Assessment Update

An update to the traffic impact assessment for the proposed development, analyzing existing and post-development traffic conditions and intersection performance.

Pages 95–1144 key facts
Appendix

MEMORANDUM - Review of Options to Add Additional Capacity on Helmcken Road

A technical memorandum reviewing options to address PM peak hour queuing issues observed on Helmcken Road.

Pages 115–1173 key facts
Appendix

Eagles Nest Residences, View Royal Arborist Report: Demolition Impact Assessment & Tree Preservation Plan

An assessment of tree preservation opportunities and demolition impacts for the proposed multi-unit development.

Pages 118–1194 key facts
Appendix

Helmcken/Burnside – Tree Preservation Plan

A report by Talbot Mackenzie & Associates outlining mitigation measures to protect trees during construction, including barrier fencing and arborist supervision.

Pages 120–1223 key facts
Appendix

Helmcken / Burnside Tree Resource

A comprehensive 10-page table listing every inventoried tree on or near the site with its species, size, health, and structural condition.

Pages 123–1323 key facts
Appendix

Highstreet Ventures: Topographic Survey of Plan of 3 Helmcken Road

A technical survey map by McElhanney showing existing topography and the approximate locations of trees for the development site.

Page 1333 key facts
Appendix

Eagles Nest Residences Site Plan

An architectural site plan showing the proposed layout of the Eagles Nest Residences, including buildings ranging from 3 to 6 storeys.

Page 1343 key facts
Appendix

Tree Resource Spreadsheet Methodology and Definitions

Definitions and methodology document for the tree resource inventory, explaining how measurements like DBH and Critical Root Zones are determined.

Pages 135–1362 key facts
Appendix

Tree Protection Fencing Detail

Technical design drawing specifying the construction requirements for protective tree fencing on the development site.

Page 1373 key facts
Appendix

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) located at Helmcken Road & Burnside Road W

Environmental assessment report identifying potential environmental concerns at the site, specifically focusing on historical heating oil tanks.

Pages 138–1525 key facts
Staff Report

Phase I ESA: Helmcken Rd & Burnside Rd W, View Royal, BC

A technical report prepared by McElhanney providing a preliminary assessment of potential environmental concerns for properties proposed for redevelopment.

Pages 153–1644 key facts
Appendix

Appendix A: Select Site Photographs

Supporting photographic evidence for the Phase I ESA, documenting current buildings, site conditions, and identified environmental concerns.

Pages 165–1782 key facts
Appendix

Appendix B: Select Aerial Photographs

Historical aerial imagery used in the Phase I ESA to track land use changes on the subject properties from 1932 to 1980.

Pages 179–1852 key facts
Staff Report

Phase I ESA: Helmcken Rd & Burnside Rd W, View Royal, BC - Photographs

A collection of historical aerial and site photographs of the Eagles Nest project site from 1986 to 2017.

Pages 186–1913 key facts
Appendix

Appendix C - Land Titles

Section divider for land title documentation related to the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment.

Page 192
Other

Title Search Print - CA5514492

Legal land title search for 1480 Burnside Road identifying current owners and charges.

Pages 193–1944 key facts
Other

Title Search Print - CA5749621

Legal land title search for Lot 1 Section 9 Esquimalt District Plan 18753.

Pages 195–1964 key facts
Other

Title Search Print - CA6364876

Legal land title search for 1480 Burnside Road West owned by a construction company.

Page 1974 key facts
Other

Title Search Print - CA6364879

Legal land title search for Lot 10, Block 5, Section 9, Esquimalt District, Plan 1726.

Page 1984 key facts
Appendix

Appendix D - ERIS Ecolog Database Search Results

Section divider for the environmental risk database search results.

Page 199
Other

ERIS Database Report - Helmcken Phase I ESA

Comprehensive environmental database search report for the property at 3 Helmcken Road to identify potential risks and historical site issues.

Pages 200–2184 key facts
Other

Environmental Risk Information Services - Site Registry and Definitions

Technical document excerpt describing environmental databases and definitions used in risk assessment reporting for the project site.

Pages 219–2203 key facts
Appendix

Appendix E - Opta Fire Insurance Records (Enviroscan Report)

Historical environmental and fire insurance record search for 3 Helmcken Road, providing map data and database search results.

Pages 221–2254 key facts
Appendix

Appendix F - Vancouver Public Library Civic Directories (InfoAction Search Results)

Results of a city directory search for various street addresses associated with the development site dating back to 1910.

Pages 226–2284 key facts
Other

“Eagle Nest” at Helmcken Rd & Burnside Rd Parking Study

Technical study assessing the parking demand for a proposed 260-unit residential development, concluding that the proposed 366 off-street spaces are sufficient.

Pages 229–2424 key facts
Other

EAGLE NEST Helmcken Road Report

Traffic operations review and mitigation report for the Helmcken Road corridor near the proposed development site.

Pages 243–2514 key facts
Staff Report

Eagle Nest Helmcken Road Report (Excerpts)

A portion of a traffic impact report discussing existing congestion at Helmcken Road intersections and proposing roadway capacity improvements.

Page 2523 key facts
Appendix

APPENDIX A: ROADWAY MODIFICATION QUEUE LENGTH IMPACTS

Visual diagrams illustrating existing and estimated 2028 post-development traffic queue lengths during PM peak hours.

Pages 253–2543 key facts
Appendix

APPENDIX B: ROADWAY MODIFICATIONS CONCEPT PLANS

Concept design plans for roadway improvements including new lanes and a pedestrian refuge at Helmcken Road and Watkiss Way.

Pages 255–2573 key facts
Appendix

APPENDIX C: DEDICATED RIGHT TURN LANE CONCEPT PLAN

Engineering concept plan for a second westbound through lane and right turn lane at the Helmcken Road and Watkiss Way intersection.

Pages 258–2592 key facts
Appendix

Microtremor Survey Memo

A geotechnical survey report assessing seismic site class and depth to bedrock at 3 and 5 Helmcken Road.

Pages 260–2613 key facts
Appendix

Limited Hazardous Materials Investigation - 3 Helmcken Road, Victoria, BC

A report detailing the presence of hazardous materials such as asbestos and lead in a building scheduled for demolition.

Pages 262–2774 key facts
Appendix

Appendix 1 - Photographs (Hazardous Materials Investigation)

Photographic documentation of samples taken from buildings at 3 Helmcken Road, 1445 Burnside, and 1449 Burnside for hazardous material testing.

Pages 278–2824 key facts
Appendix

Appendix 2 - Laboratory Results (Hazardous Materials Investigation)

Laboratory analysis results confirming the composition of materials sampled during the hazardous materials investigation.

Pages 283–2843 key facts
Appendix

Asbestos Bulk Sample Report

A technical report detailing asbestos testing of materials at 3 Helmcken Road, likely included as part of the redevelopment assessment.

Pages 285–2873 key facts
Appendix

Helmcken & Burnside Tenant Relocation Matrix - January 22, 2020

A chart comparing tenant relocation compensation and notice requirements between Victoria, Vancouver, the BC Residential Tenancy Act, and the proposed Eagles Nest development.

Page 2884 key facts
Appendix

Eagle’s Nest Development Data | 20-02-04

A summary table of technical development statistics including site coverage, building heights, unit counts, and parking ratios.

Page 2895 key facts
Appendix

Site Analysis - Eagle Nest Residences

Architectural site analysis drawing showing a bird's eye view looking west of the proposed development area and surrounding buildings.

Page 2903 key facts
Bylaw

Bylaw No. 1050 - CD-24: Burnside Helmcken Residential

The draft text of the zoning amendment bylaw establishing the CD-24 zone with subzones A, B, and C.

Pages 291–2934 key facts
Presentation

Municipal Staff Presentation - Rezoning - 3, 5 and 9 Helmcken Road and 1449 Burnside Road West (Eagle Nest)

A 22-slide presentation detailing the Eagles Nest project proposal, including site context, unit mix, transportation overview, and staff recommendations.

Pages 294–3155 key facts
Bylaw

TOWN OF VIEW ROYAL BYLAW NO. 1050

The formal bylaw document for consideration, amending Zoning Bylaw No. 900 to create the CD-24 zone.

Pages 316–3173 key facts
Appendix

Schedule 1 - Amendments to Zoning Map (Amendment Bylaw No. 1050, 2020)

A zoning map amendment showing the division of the subject property into Subzones A, B, and C with designated building heights ranging from 3 to 6 storeys.

Page 3184 key facts
Correspondence

Correspondence from D. Foord (Invictus Commercial Investment Corp) - Eagles Nest Flier

An email from the applicant providing additional materials for the public hearing, including a relative heights diagram and density comparison.

Page 3193 key facts
Appendix

Eagles Nest FAQ Sheet

A public information flier for the Eagles Nest project including architectural sketches and contact information for the public hearing.

Page 3202 key facts
Appendix

Proposed Development Summary - Community Benefits

A list of project benefits including tax revenue, infrastructure improvements like a bus lay-by, and environmental features.

Page 3214 key facts
Appendix

Proposed Development Summary - Community Engagement & Immediate Neighbours

A summary of the 10 community meetings held and specific modifications made to mitigate impacts on the Hidden Oak Townhouses.

Page 3223 key facts
Appendix

Proposed Development Summary - Town of View Royal Benefits

An estimation of financial contributions and tax revenues resulting from the project.

Page 3233 key facts
Appendix

Building Height Above Ground Level Diagram

A 3D visualization of the proposed development in context with surrounding building heights measured in meters and feet.

Page 3242 key facts
Appendix

Property Comparison Table

A table comparing Eagles Nest to other multi-family developments in View Royal regarding storeys, FSR, and density.

Page 3253 key facts
Correspondence

Correspondence from D. Foord (Invictus) - Council Meeting and Eagles Nest

An email discussing the project's consistency with the Official Community Plan (OCP) and the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on local development.

Pages 326–3272 key facts
Correspondence

Correspondence from D. Foord (Invictus) - Eagles Nest Opponents Analysis

An email analyzing the specific concerns of the 20 project opponents identified from previous meetings.

Pages 328–3293 key facts
Appendix

Opponents Communication to Council Spreadsheet

A detailed log of every individual who communicated in opposition to the project, including dates and specific concerns.

Page 3302 key facts
Correspondence

Correspondence from D. Foord (Invictus) - Project Progress and CD Zone

An email to the Mayor discussing the draft Comprehensive Development (CD) bylaw, potential subdivision, and economic impacts of the pandemic.

Pages 331–3354 key facts
Appendix

Sub-Zone Diagram - dHKarchitects

A detailed technical site plan showing three sub-zones, building footprints, and setbacks from property lines.

Page 3363 key facts
Correspondence

Correspondence from D. Foord (Invictus) - Eagles Nest and Correspondence Attachments

Cover email for attached correspondence from Melissa Murray and Robin Quenet, urging Council to disregard a previous petition.

Page 3371 key fact
Correspondence

Correspondence from Robin Quenet - Opposition to Project

An email from a Saanich resident expressing concern about building height and the impact on the rural ALR interface.

Page 3382 key facts
Correspondence

Correspondence from Melissa Murray - Support for Project

An email from a resident clarifying that their signature on a previous petition was obtained under false pretenses and stating 100% support for the development.

Pages 339–3402 key facts
Correspondence

Correspondence from D. Foord (Invictus) - Flier Distribution

An email stating that 2,500 copies of the project flier were delivered to homes throughout View Royal.

Page 3412 key facts
Appendix

Appendix: Eagles Nest FAQ Sheet (Duplicate)

A duplicate of the project flier/FAQ sheet used for the 2500-home distribution.

Page 342
Appendix

Appendix: Proposed Development Summary - Community Benefits (Duplicate)

A duplicate of the community benefits summary page.

Page 343
Appendix

Appendix: Proposed Development Summary - Community Engagement (Duplicate)

A duplicate of the community engagement summary page.

Page 344
Appendix

Appendix: Proposed Development Summary - Town Benefits (Duplicate)

A duplicate of the financial benefits summary page.

Page 345
Correspondence

Correspondence from D. Foord (Invictus) - BC Transit Bus Passes

An email outlining a new incentive for residents: a $500 electric bicycle rebate or a 6-month bus pass.

Page 3463 key facts
Presentation

Eagles Nest Public Hearing Presentation

Slides for the applicant's formal presentation to the public hearing, covering planning, engagement, and project benefits.

Pages 347–3502 key facts
Presentation

Applicant Presentation - Rezoning - 3, 5 and 9 Helmcken Road and 1449 Burnside Road West (Eagles Nest)

A detailed project presentation for the Eagles Nest development proposal, covering site statistics, engagement history, transportation planning, and community benefits.

Pages 351–3838 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated June 10, 2020 from T. Moody, 13-15 Helmcken Road, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Tracey Moody expresses continued opposition to the Invictus Development due to unit density, building height, and traffic impacts.

Page 3843 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated June 9, 2020 from D. Barr, 23 Helmcken Road, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Doris Barr states opposition to the development complex, specifically citing concerns over increased traffic congestion on Helmcken Road.

Page 3853 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated June 8, 2020 from W. Obee, 11 Quincy Street, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

William Obee opposes the bylaw amendment, arguing that the project exceeds local infrastructure capacity and detracs from the neighborhood quality.

Page 3863 key facts
Correspondence

Letter received June 8, 2020 from D. Worrall, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Don Worrall and Maryse Perraud urge the council to reject the rezoning proposal, citing current traffic issues caused by the nearby Eagle Creek complex.

Page 3873 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated June 5, 2020 from B. Koning and M. Zemliak, 3873 Holland Avenue, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Ben Koning and Muriel Zemliak express concerns regarding project density, traffic gridlock, and intersection safety at Burnside and Helmcken.

Pages 388–3894 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated June 5, 2020 from J. Palliser, 15 Quincy Street, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Jane Palliser submits an email stating opposition to high density development at the Burnside and Helmcken location.

Page 3903 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated June 3, 2020 from M. & D. Barnard, 21 Tawny Place, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Michael and Doreen Barnard oppose the project, specifically the 6-story building height and the number of units proposed.

Page 3914 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated June 3, 2020 from M. Murray, 37 Camden Avenue, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Melissa Murray expresses 100% support for the Eagles Nest development, citing its necessity for housing affordability and community growth.

Pages 392–3934 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated May 19, 2020 from E. Duggan, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Edmond Duggan voices support for the development due to its proximity to transportation corridors and potential for tax revenue.

Page 3943 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated May 19, 2020 from L. Koorbatoff and R. Peters, 1490 Burnside Road W., Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Correspondence from Saanich residents expressing concern about the project's lack of fit with the rural nature and existing traffic congestion.

Pages 395–3964 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated May 19, 2020 from Marc Cittone, Re: Proposed Eagles' Nest Development

Marc Cittone supports the density of the project but argues that there is too much parking provided for a transit-oriented location.

Pages 397–3984 key facts
Correspondence

Email date May 16, 2020 from M. Finnis, 1262 Stancil Lane, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Mark Finnis raises concerns regarding building height, environmental status (LEED), and the removal of rental suites from the plan.

Page 3994 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated May 15, 2020 from J. Devonshire, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Jane Devonshire supports the development for its focus on density and active transportation but requests less parking and fossil-fuel free systems.

Pages 400–4014 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated May 15, 2020 from E. Ritzer, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Edith Ritzer expresses brief support for the development project.

Page 4022 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated May 11, 2020 from C. Pacheco, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Cynthia Pacheco opposes the project, citing concerns about stress on a 'maxed out' intersection and two-lane country roads.

Page 4033 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated May 7, 2020 from D. Young, 1146 Burnside Road W., Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Diane Young opposes the development due to traffic volumes and the lack of advanced left turns at the Helmcken/Burnside intersection.

Page 4043 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated May 7, 2020 from L. Kopp, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Leanne Kopp objects to the development on the grounds of increased traffic density and the loss of local green space.

Page 4053 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated May 6, 2020 from R. Quenet, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Robin Quenet, a Saanich resident, expresses concern about the 6-story building's impact on the rural ALR interface and visual density.

Page 4063 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated May 5, 2020 from D. Gawley, 15 Helmcken Road, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

David Gawley writes to state that the developer has not truly 'listened' to the neighbors and requests a public hearing for concerns to be heard.

Page 4073 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated May 5, 2020 from T. Moody, 13-15 Helmcken Road, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Tracey Moody argues that the project density significantly exceeds what is supported by the current official community plan and zoning.

Page 4083 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated May 5, 2020 from J. Bates, 15 Helmcken Road, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Jack Bates registers an opinion that the project remains contentious and demands a public meeting where voices can be heard.

Page 4093 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated May 5, 2020 from O. Young, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Olivia Young objects to the project's size and density, emphasizing the impact on traffic infrastructure and commute times.

Pages 410–4114 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated May 4, 2020 from D. & W. Tims, 3-15 Helmcken Road, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Dave and Wilma Tims write in support of Sue Melanson's previous correspondence opposing the project density.

Page 4123 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated May 4, 2020 from L. Bates, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Linda Bates expresses concern that the development will devalue property and reduce quality of life through noise and increased traffic.

Page 4132 key facts
Correspondence

Email date May 4, 2020 from R. & S. Reinsch, 17-15 Helmcken Road, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Richard and Simone Reinsch write to the council stating that the density of the proposed project is inappropriate for the site.

Page 4143 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated May 4, 2020 from N. Knott, 123 Conard Street, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Nicole Knott opposes the multi-family complex, citing existing safety issues with traffic on side streets like Conard Street.

Page 4153 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated May 4, 2020 from J. Rhodes, Burnside Road W., Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Jamie Rhodes supports the 'Your Voice' community group and outlines caveats for supporting development, including preserving green space and meeting high energy standards.

Page 4164 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated May 4, 2020 from G. & S. Melanson, 22-15 Helmcken Road, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

The writers inquire about the schedule for public engagement regarding the Eagle's Nest proposal following a letter from the developer.

Page 4173 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated April 22, 2020 from H. & G. Russell, 6 Helmcken Road, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Residents living across from the proposed site express support for the development after concerns were addressed by the developer.

Page 4183 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated April 20, 2020 from S. Melanson, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

The writer requests that public hearings be deferred until they can be safely conducted in person despite COVID-19 restrictions.

Page 4192 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated April 20, 2020 from D. Gawley, 15 Helmcken Road, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

The writer provides feedback on public hearing options during COVID-19 and criticizes the developer's communications.

Page 4203 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated March 17, 2020 from S. Melanson, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

The writer argues that a pickleball survey should be dismissed as it does not accurately reflect community support for the development.

Page 4212 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated March 12, 2020 from S. Samra, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

A Saanich resident expresses concerns regarding traffic management and density resulting from the proposed 250ish new living spaces.

Page 4223 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated March 10, 2020 from S. & S. Henry, 3906 Holland Avenue, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Residents oppose the development's density and height, stating it violates the Official Community Plan and will worsen local traffic.

Pages 423–4244 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated March 9, 2020 from T. Moody, 13-15 Helmcken Road, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

A resident of Hidden Oaks expresses concern about the project's density and building height, suggesting 3-4 stories would be more appropriate.

Page 4253 key facts
Correspondence

Letter dated March 9, 2020 from T. Main, President, Victoria Regional Pickleball Association, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

The Association submits a petition supporting the development and the use of amenity funds for pickleball courts at Helmcken Centennial Park.

Page 4263 key facts
Other

View Royal Development and Pickleball Petition List

A list of signators supporting the Eagles Nest project and the redevelopment of Helmcken Centennial Park to include pickleball courts.

Pages 427–4322 key facts
Other

VR DEVELOPMENT/PICKLEBALL COURTS PETITION MUNICIPAL TOTALS IDENTIFIED

A statistical breakdown of the petition signators by municipality.

Page 4334 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated May 5, 2020 from O. Young, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

A Saanich resident expresses extreme concern over project density and the lack of proper traffic infrastructure to support 400 new parking stalls.

Pages 434–4354 key facts
Correspondence

Letter dated March 6, 2020 from G. & S. Melanson, 22-15 Helmcken Road, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

The writers oppose the rezoning application, citing insufficient reduction in density and questioning the transparency of the developer's petition.

Pages 436–4374 key facts
Correspondence

Letter received January 21, 2020 from K. Brigidear, 15 Helmcken Road, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

A resident of Hidden Oaks details concerns regarding the lack of transparency from the developer during focus group meetings.

Page 4383 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated January 14, 2020 from S. & S. Henry, 3906 Holland Avenue, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

The writers urge the Committee of the Whole to reject the rezoning application due to non-compliance with the Official Community Plan.

Pages 439–4403 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated January 14, 2020 from M. Strome, 1275 Burnside Road West, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

The writer requests that the developer address concerns regarding density, building height, and the unrealistic expectation that highway changes will solve traffic issues.

Page 4413 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated January 13, 2020 from R. Reinsch, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Residents of Hidden Oaks express their concurrence with the contents of a previously submitted document (likely the Brigidear letter).

Page 4422 key facts
Correspondence

Letter dated January 14, 2020 from K. Brigidear (Correspondence Copy)

Duplicate entry of the letter regarding focus group interactions and density concerns from Hidden Oaks residents.

Page 4432 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated January 13, 2020 from T. Moody, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

The writer informs Council of interactions between the developer and Hidden Oaks residents and expresses ongoing concerns about high density.

Page 4442 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated January 12, 2020 from R. Quenet, 1481 Burnside Road West, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Residents of Burnside Road West express extreme concern and request that the development conform to the existing OCP rural character and 'Mixed Residential' designation.

Pages 445–4463 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated January 11, 2020 from L. Bates, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

Residents of Hidden Oaks urge Council to consider the negative impacts and potential damage to the neighborhood caused by high-density projects.

Page 4472 key facts
Correspondence

Letter regarding Invictus Development (Unsigned Copy)

Duplicate content of the correspondence from Hidden Oaks residents regarding density and focus group meetings.

Page 4482 key facts
Correspondence

Email dated January 11, 2020 from S. Melanson, Re: Proposed Eagles Nest Development

The writer highlights the lack of transparency from the developer regarding unit counts and expresses concern that the project is inconsistent with the community milieu.

Page 4492 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Reg and Diane Young regarding Invictus development

Opposition to the development due to traffic congestion on Burnside Road, safety concerns for residents, and perceived lack of transparency from the developer.

Pages 450–4513 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Marc Cittone regarding Eagle's Nest Development

Feedback regarding sustainability, suggesting a reduction in proposed parking and improved design for bicycle lanes on Helmcken Road.

Page 4523 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Elana Penner regarding Eagles Nest Condos

Support for the condominium proposal, citing benefits to local trades during construction and increased tax revenue for the Town.

Page 4533 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Jane Devonshire regarding Eagles Nest Development

Support for the project with recommendations to include features like e-bike charging, transit passes, and car-sharing options.

Page 4542 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Eric Adkins regarding Eagles Nest Development

Support for the development due to its proximity to Eagle Creek Village and suggestion to include affordable housing units.

Page 4553 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Elham Moldovanos regarding Non support of the proposed development

Opposition to the high-density project based on anticipated traffic congestion resulting from 247 units.

Page 4564 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Len M regarding Eagles Nest Development

Resident concerns regarding traffic impacts on the Watkiss Way to Burnside corridor and a request to delay approvals until proper virtual consultation occurs.

Page 4573 key facts
Correspondence

Email from jack bates regarding Public Hearing June 16, 2020

Specific concerns from a neighbor regarding right-of-way usage, driveway safety, fencing, and winter surface runoff flooding.

Page 4584 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Mark Huang regarding Eagle's Nest Public Hearing Comment

Opposition to the development based on excessive density and unsuitability for the existing neighborhood context.

Page 4593 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Murray Strome regarding Public Meeting and rezoning/building permit

Opposition based on building height and density, suggesting a maximum of 4 storeys and approximately 200 units.

Page 4602 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Robin Quenet regarding Proposed Development at Helmcken and Burnside Roads

Opposition citing that the 6-story design is out of character with the rural nature of the area and farmland.

Page 4613 key facts
Form

Tenant Support Form - Villages Pizza

Signed support form from a tenant at Eagle Creek Village Shopping Center.

Page 4624 key facts
Form

Tenant Support Form - Cascadia Liquor

Signed support form from a tenant at Eagle Creek Village Shopping Center.

Page 4634 key facts
Form

Tenant Support Form - Equilibrium Therapeutics

Signed support form from a tenant at Eagle Creek Village Shopping Center.

Page 4644 key facts
Form

Tenant Support Form - Eagle Creek Village Dental

Signed support form from a tenant at Eagle Creek Village Shopping Center.

Page 4654 key facts
Form

Tenant Support Form - Subway

Signed support form from a tenant at Eagle Creek Village Shopping Center.

Page 4664 key facts
Form

Tenant Support Form - Quality Foods

Signed support form from a tenant at Eagle Creek Village Shopping Center.

Page 4674 key facts
Form

Tenant Support Form - COBS Bread

Signed support form from a tenant at Eagle Creek Village Shopping Center.

Page 4684 key facts
Form

Tenant Support Form - Arosa Lifestyle Medicine

Signed support form from a tenant at Eagle Creek Village Shopping Center.

Page 4694 key facts
Form

Tenant Support Form - Forbes Pharmacy

Signed support form from a tenant at Eagle Creek Village Shopping Center.

Page 4704 key facts
Form

Tenant Support Form - View Royal Surgical Centre

Signed support form from a tenant at Eagle Creek Village Shopping Center.

Page 4714 key facts
Correspondence

Letter from Invictus Commercial Investment Corp. to Eagles Crest Commercial Tenants

Communication from the developer to local business tenants requesting their support for the project to counter neighborhood opposition.

Page 4723 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Alix Morrison regarding Eagles Nest Project

Support for the development based on its density compliance, community involvement, and walkable location.

Page 4733 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Helen King regarding Eagle's Nest Development Feedback

Strong opposition based on extreme traffic congestion on Helmcken Road and dangerous cycling/pedestrian conditions.

Page 4742 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Tracey Fulthorp regarding Eagle’s Nest

Local resident opposition due to inappropriate high density in an already congested location.

Page 4753 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Ethan Mallais regarding Eagles nest development

Property owner adjacent to the site objects to the 6-story building height and its impact on neighboring fields.

Page 4763 key facts
Correspondence

Letter from Bob and Doris Burow regarding Eagle's Nest by Invictus Development

Long-term residents expressing concern that the proposed density and height (suggesting 3-4 storeys instead) will tower over the neighborhood.

Page 4773 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Mary Ferrarelli regarding Helmcken and Burnside development

Voting 'NO' to the proposal due to excessive unit density feeding into a single intersection already complicated by Eagle Creek.

Page 4784 key facts
Correspondence

Email from SUE HENRY regarding REZONING application for 3, 5 and 9 Helmcken Road

Extensive opposition letter arguing that 5-6 story buildings are inappropriate for a rural/urban interface and will exacerbate excessive traffic challenges.

Pages 479–4804 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Angela Hanes regarding Helmcken and Burnside Development - Eagle's Nest

Support for the development, noting the lessened density and ample on-site parking as suitable for the area.

Page 4813 key facts
Correspondence

Email from Gail Hoyle regarding 3,5 and 9 Helmcken Road and 1449 Burnside Road

Opposition based on building height and dangerous traffic conditions on Burnside Road, which is viewed as a main thoroughfare.

Page 4822 key facts