Committee of the Whole Report: Delegation of Small-Scale, Multi-Unit Housing and Garden Suite Permits
A prior report from May 2024 detailing the rationale for delegating authority to streamline housing construction.
TOWN OF VIEW ROYAL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT
TO: Committee of the Whole
DATE: May 24, 2024
FROM: Stirling Scory, RPP, MCIP, Senior Planner; Leanne Taylor, RPP, MCIP, Director of Development Services
MEETING DATE: June 11, 2024
DELEGATION OF SMALL-SCALE, MULTI-UNIT HOUSING AND GARDEN SUITE FORM AND CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT PERMITS, AND DEVELOPMENT PERMIT RENEWALS
PURPOSE:
To present the Committee of the Whole with proposed amendments to Delegation Bylaw No. 872, 2015, to provide staff with additional delegated approval authority for garden suites and Small-Scale, Multi-Unit Housing (SSMUH) form and character development permits (DPs) up to six dwelling units, regulated through the Official Community Plan (OCP), and development permit renewals.
OPTIONS:
Option 1 – Recommended: Delegate Authority for Intensive Residential – Garden Suite and SSMUH Form and Character Development Permits, and Development Permit renewals
THAT the necessary bylaw amendment be prepared to grant delegated authority to the Director of Development Services to approve the following:
- Form and character development permits for garden suites within Intensive Residential – Garden Suite Development Permit Area (DPA) and SSMUH up to six units within the Mixed Residential DPA.
- The renewal of an existing valid development permit subject to the following conditions: i. The permit being renewed must be unlapsed at the time of application; ii. The plans must be unchanged from the original approved development permit; unless the changes are for consistency with new policies or regulations in which case a delegated development permit renewal does not apply; and iii. The permit be valid for two years from the date of issuance.
Rationale:
Under Option 1, staff would have the delegated authority to approve garden suite and Mixed-Residential DPs that would be applicable only for SSMUH development up to six dwelling units. Staff would not have delegated authority to approve variances; this means any DP containing a variance(s) request would require Council approval.
Staff anticipate that there may be an increased demand on Development Services’ workload with additional permit applications for garden suites and SSMUH DPs. By granting delegated authority to staff, it would streamline the development approval process and improve the efficiency of limited staff resources while still ensuring that new developments are consistent with design guidelines and fit in with neighbourhood context. A development application that is not consistent with the design guidelines would be referred to Council for consideration.
There have been occasions due to unforeseen circumstances where an approved DP lapses after two years because construction has not substantially started. Instead of requiring an existing valid DP to go through a timely process for re-issuance, staff recommends that DP renewals be delegated to staff. The conditions would be that the original DP has not lapsed at the time of renewal and the plans remain consistent with the approved plans from the originally approved DP; unless the changes are for consistency with new policies or regulations in which case a delegated development permit renewal would not apply.
Option 2: Delegate Garden Suite DPs and Development Permit renewals only
THAT the necessary bylaw amendment be prepared to grant delegated authority to the Director of Development Services to approve the following:
- Form and character development permits for garden suites within Intensive Residential – Garden Suite Development Permit Area.
- The renewal of an existing valid development permit subject to the following conditions: i. The permit being renewed must be unlapsed at the time of application; ii. The plans must be unchanged from the original approved development permit; unless the changes are for consistency with new policies or regulations in which case a delegated development permit renewal does not apply; and iii. The permit be valid for two years from the date of issuance.
Rationale:
Option 2 would allow for the delegated authority of garden suite DPs; however, SSMUH DPs up to six units would require Council approval. This option would demand a significant amount of staff time and resources to process small-scale infill development applications as it requires the preparation of staff reports, presentations and agendas (which involves multiple staff), and it adds to the delay for an applicant to receive a building permit to construct SSMUH housing.
Should the Committee support Option 2, staff anticipate delays in development permit approval timelines due to an increased volume of DP applications as a result of Bill 44 - 2023. To maintain an exceptional level of service and improve operational efficiencies, Option 2 is not recommended.
Option 3: No additional delegated authority to staff
THAT Council not delegate authority to staff to approve garden suite and SSMUH development permits up to six units, and development permit renewals.
Rationale:
Under Option 3, Council would continue to approve garden suite and SSMUH DPs, and DP renewals. Even though development permits would be considered and approved within a public forum, this option would likely result in delays in small-scale infill housing development permit approval timelines. To maintain an exceptional level of service and improve operational efficiencies, Option 3 is not recommended.
TIME CRITICAL:
This report is not time critical; however, it would be useful to amend the Delegation Bylaw in parallel with the other bylaw amendments that are occurring around Bill 44 legislation to facilitate a comprehensive approach, and greatly improving operational efficiencies and effectiveness.
BACKGROUND:
Under the provincial housing legislation introduced through Bill 44 – 2023, and the Provincial Policy Manual and Site Standards guidelines, municipalities are encouraged to look at ways to improve development approval processes.
DISCUSSION:
View Royal’s Delegation Bylaw (Bylaw No. 872) currently delegates authority for two permit types: natural watercourse and shoreline, and sensitive terrestrial ecosystem permits where variances are not requested.
Delegation of Garden Suite and SSMUH Development Permits
Staff have completed a regional comparison analysis of municipalities in the region, which currently have delegated authorities for multi-unit residential and garden suite/carriage house form and character development permits. See Table 1 below:
Table 1 - Delegated Authority Summary of Approval Powers
| Municipality | Delegated Authority | Authorized Staff | Multi-Unit Residential Form and Character Development Permit | Garden Suite/ Carriage House Form and Character Development Permit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Town of View Royal¹ | Yes | Chief Administrative Officer (1st); and Corporate Officer (2nd) | No | No |
| City of Colwood² | Yes | Director of Development Services (1st) Chief; and Administrative Officer (2nd) | Yes | No |
| City of Langford³ | Yes | Director of Development Services | Yes | Yes |
| Township of Esquimalt⁴ | Yes | Director of Development Services | Yes | Yes |
| City of Victoria⁵ | Yes | Director of Sustainable Planning and Community Development Department | Yes | Yes |
| District of Saanich⁶ | Yes | Director of Planning (1st); and either Manager of Current Planning (2nd) or Manager of Environmental Services (2nd) | Yes | Yes |
Of note is the Township of Esquimalt, which has recently amended their delegation bylaw (March 2024) to be consistent with the Province’s housing legislation and provincial policy manual and site standards guidelines. The Township delegates all development permits to the Director of Development Services. This also includes SSMUH DPs for up to six residential units.
The City of Victoria has taken a similar approach to delegated authority by authorizing the Director of Planning and Sustainable Development to approve a variety of different types of development permit applications, including missing middle housing developments up to 12 units. The District of Saanich has provided delegated authority to the Director of Planning to approve form and character and environmental permits.
In Langford, multi-unit residential and carriage house development permits that meet the Development Permit Guidelines set out in the Official Community Plan may be approved by the Director of Planning.
To streamline the development approval process, improve the efficiency of limited staff resources, and ensure that new developments are consistent with design guidelines and fit in with neighbourhood context, staff recommend that Council consider delegating approval of garden suite and SSMUH up to six dwelling units to the Director of Development Services. The Director would not have delegated authority to approve variances; meaning any DP containing a variance(s) would continue to require Council consideration for approval.
¹ Town of View Royal Delegation Bylaw No. 872, 2015 ² City of Colwood Development Permit Delegation Bylaw No. 1742, 2018 (Consolidated July 8, 2022) ³ City of Langford District of Langford Development Permit Delegation Bylaw No. 449, 2000 ⁴ Township of Esquimalt Development Application Procedures and Fees Bylaw No. 2791 (Consolidated March 4, 2024) ⁵ City of Victoria Land Use Procedures Bylaw No. 16-028, 2016 (Consolidated October 5, 2023) ⁶ District of Saanich Delegation Authorization Bylaw (Development Permits) No. 9649, 2020
Development Permit Renewals
An approved development permit lapses after two years if construction has not substantially started. In some circumstances, approved development permits lapse and must be reissued due to unforeseen circumstances, such as financing, geotechnical issues, material and trade shortages, etc., that delay construction.
Currently, development permit renewals must go through the same development permit approval process as a new DP. Instead of requiring an existing valid DP to go through a timely process for re-issuance, staff recommends that all DP renewals are delegated to staff. The conditions of a DP renewal would be that the original DP has not lapsed at time of renewal and the plans are consistent with the approved plans in the original DP; unless the changes are for consistency with new policies or regulations in which case a delegated development permit renewal does not apply. Should Council consider delegating DP renewal authority to staff, staff would be able to renew all DPs, including residential (mixed-residential, neighbourhood mixed-use, intensive mixed-use) and commercial form and character DPs, as well as environmental (natural watercourse and shore line areas, and sensitive terrestrial ecosystem area) DPs.
Reporting
Should Council consider delegating approval of garden suite and SSMUH DPs, and DP renewals to the Director of Development Services, staff would report back in one year with a review of the applications to determine if the approach has been successful in meeting the established goals.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Should the Committee support Option 1, it is expected that the amount of staff time and resources required to prepare development permit applications for Committee of the Whole and Council would be reduced, resulting in a reduction of operational costs and increasing operational and procedural efficiencies.
Should the Committee maintain the business as usual approach under Option 3, it is expected that with the additional development permit applications for garden suites and SSMUH, development application processes, applicants’ project timelines, and staff workload would be negatively impacted.
The current DP application fee would remain unchanged for delegated applications and renewals.
CONCLUSION:
To streamline development approval processes, maintain exceptional level of service and enhance operational efficiencies, staff recommend that Intensive Residential – Garden Suite and SSMUH form and character DPs, for up to six dwelling units, and development permit renewals be delegated to staff.
Should the Committee support Option 1, a draft amendment bylaw is provided as Attachment 1 and can be brought forward for consideration of readings at an upcoming Council meeting.
| CONCURRENCE: | Initials | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Administrative Officer | SS | I concur with the recommendation. |
| REVIEWED BY: | Initials |
|---|---|
| Director of Corporate Administration | N/A |
| Director of Finance | N/A |
| Director of Development Services | LT |
| Director of Engineering and Parks | N/A |
| Director of Protective Services | N/A |
ATTACHMENTS:
- Draft Delegation Bylaw No. 872, 2015, Amendment Bylaw No. 1140, 2024
- Redline Delegation Bylaw No. 872, 2014, Amendment Bylaw No. 1140, 2024
