Presentation
Speaking Points to Site C Dam Proposal
March 17, 2015Page 191 section
Outline of seven key economic and environmental concerns regarding the Site C Dam, including lost farmland and seismic activity.
5340 hectares of land affected78 First Nations heritage sites at risk of floodingClaims 10-12 alternative renewable energy projects could provide 8x the jobs
Speaking Points to Site C Dam Proposal
Honourable Mayor and Council, I believe you already have the Mayor of Hudson's Hope, Mayor Johansson's package of information behind her request for a 1 year delay in the construction of the Site C Dam.
To that we would like to add some of the economic costs it would have on the residents of BC:
- Lost Farmland, Changes to the ALR – out of the 5340 hectares affected, the majority is prime farmland. This is a huge cost to us in terms of food security.
- Loss of Wildlife Habitat – migratory paths of fish would be damaged leading to loss and disappearance of some species; on land there would be adverse effects on birds, local vegetation and 23 protected wildlife species
- Landslides and Shrinking Reservoirs - loss of efficacy over time from silting up and an increasing number of landslides
- Increasing Seismic Activity – this is already an issue with the fracking up north, although this report was available, it was not mentioned in the review process. Why one must ask?
- Pressuring of Tectonic Plate – the sheer weight of the dam reservoir could trigger more quakes. Again, at what cost?
- 1st Nations Treaty 8 Land – 78 FN heritage sites would be flooded. How would you feel if your loved ones burial grounds were to be submerged? There is a moral cost to this.
- Legal Challenges – there are currently 6 legal challenges both by FN and farmers, litigation costs are huge
There are solutions for our energy. There are 10 – 12 alternative renewable energy projects that do not bury arable land, that do not affect FN land, but which do provide 8x the number of jobs.
Page 19
Extracted from: 2015 03 17 Council Agenda
