Correspondence Re: BC Government's Use of Provincial Paramountcy to Undermine Local Government Bylaws
Letter from the Mayor of Penticton requesting support in challenging the use of provincial paramountcy regarding a homeless shelter.
April 13, 2021
President Brian Frenkel c/o Union of British Columbia Municipalities 525 Government Street Victoria, BC V8V 0A8
Re: B.C. Government’s Use of Provincial Paramountcy to Undermine Local Government Bylaws
Dear President Frenkel:
On behalf of Penticton City Council, I am requesting the Union of British Columbia Municipalities write a letter to Premier John Horgan requesting the reconsideration of invoking Provincial Paramountcy as it relates to the violation of Penticton City Council’s authority and the City of Penticton’s Zoning Bylaws at 352 Winnipeg Street, Penticton, BC.
The following is a timeline of events:
- When COVID-19 struck in March, 2020 many facilities that provided showers, laundry services, and meals to our most vulnerable in our community had to close and/or adapt. The City via its Emergency Operations Centre (EOC), Emergency Management BC and BC Housing worked together to find a temporary “hygiene station” and isolation shelter for anyone that was needing to isolate during COVID.
- 352 Winnipeg Street was not an ideal site for a hygiene station as it was adjacent to two seniors’ homes. However, as the site contained a vacant and free standing building that could quickly be fitted for a hygiene station, the EOC supported and worked with BC Housing to quickly stand-up the hygiene station.
- In September, 2020 BC Housing approached the City to turn the isolation shelter into a 42 bed Temporary Emergency Winter Shelter. This use was contrary to City Zoning Bylaws and although met with trepidation from the neighbourhood, Council ultimately approved a Temporary Use Permit (TUP) for the isolation shelter to be converted and operate as Temporary Winter Shelter until April 1, 2021.
- Video of the lengthy Council debates from our October 6th and 20th, 2020 meetings can be found on our website to better understand how clear individual Council members were that this was not an appropriate location, but that in the midst of the pandemic, they would grant a TUP on this one occasion.
- In March 2021, BC Housing sought an extension to this TUP until March 31, 2022 in effect changing the use from a temporary, emergency winter shelter to a year round shelter. Council denied this request based on zoning bylaws and the previous clearly communicated unsuitability of this location.
- Via resolution, Council further directed Penticton’s Safety and Security Advisory Committee to develop location selection criteria for a new, permanent winter shelter for Penticton.
- Council initially learned of the Province’s interests in exploring the use of paramountcy via an interview on Global news with Minister David Eby, who had met with Council twice early in the year to discuss a supportive housing project at 3240 Skaha Lake Rd., Penticton, BC.
- Again in March, BC Housing stated their intention to continue operations of the facility “on a balance of convenience” and asked Council to reconsider. Having been presented no alternate location as requested or new information; based on zoning bylaws and the previously communicated unsuitability of this location Council did reconsider the request and again denied the request.
- Via resolution, Council further directed staff to work with BC Housing to find alternate solutions.
- At the writing of this letter, 352 Winnipeg now operates in contravention of the City of Penticton bylaws as a newly established year round shelter following the threat of Provincial Paramountcy.
While the issue at hand is a matter of land use and planning, it is important to note according to data provided directly from the current Minister responsible for Housing to City Council, Penticton has the highest number of supportive housing beds per capita in the Interior region. Each of these beds was developed with Penticton City Council’s input and with respect for their role in the local decision making process.
In closing, Penticton City Council is hoping Minister David Eby, whom has invoked paramountcy on behalf of the Province, or Premier John Horgan as the head of a Government that promised to work collaboratively with Local Governments, reconsiders their position and adheres to our City’s bylaws. As this could happen to any one of the other 188 local governments in B.C., we ask that the Union of British Columbia Municipalities, on behalf of its membership, request Premier John Horgan reconsider the use of Provincial Paramountcy with respect to 352 Winnipeg Street, Penticton, BC.
Yours truly,
John Vassilaki Mayor
cc. Penticton City Council Donny van Dyk, Chief Administrative Officer Dan Ashton, Member of Legislative Assembly BC Local Government Elected Officials
News Release
Council seeks support from UBCM to help challenge Provincial Paramountcy
(Penticton, BC – April 13, 2021) – On behalf of City Council, Penticton Mayor, John Vassilaki, has sent a letter to the Union of British Columbia Municipalities (UBCM) President, Brian Frenkel, requesting UBCM prepare a letter to BC Premier, John Horgan, supporting Council’s position that the Province’s recent use of Paramountcy is a violation of two Council decisions and the City’s zoning Bylaws.
“My letter to Mr. Frenkel made it very clear that the issue at hand is a matter of land use and cooperative planning between two levels of government,” said Penticton Mayor, John Vassilaki. “The Attorney General and Minister Responsible for Housing, David Eby, would have British Columbians believe that the City of Penticton is not doing its part to support the housing crisis. This is simply not the case and information provided directly from the Minister shows that Penticton has the highest number of supportive housing beds per capita in the interior region. All of these beds were developed with Penticton Council’s input and with respect for Council’s role in the decision making process.
“Today our previous working relationship of bilateral cooperation has been replaced by a unilateral hammer that puts our residents at risk of having the Provincial Government plan our community. As such, Council has reached out to Mr. Frenkel and the UBCM membership at large to seek their support in reversing the Province’s conduct towards Penticton, or any other community they disagree with.”
-30-
Contact: Philip Cooper Communication Manager City of Penticton 250-490-2583


