This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Council Meeting/Documents/APPENDIX A: SYNCHRO BACKGROUND
Appendix

APPENDIX A: SYNCHRO BACKGROUND

November 3, 2020Pages 262–2632 sections

Technical background documentation describing the Synchro modeling software and Level of Service (LOS) criteria used in the traffic impact analysis.

10.a Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014, Amendment Bylaw No. 1059 to Rezone 9 Erskine Lane to CD-25: Erskine Lane Residential
Uses Synchro, SimTraffic, and SIDRA modeling softwareDefines Level of Service (LOS) on a scale from A (excellent) to F (failing)Uses HCM 2010 methodology

APPENDIX A: SYNCHRO BACKGROUND

Page 262–263

SYNCHRO MODELLING SOFTWARE DESCRIPTION

The traffic analysis was completed using Synchro (Signal and stop-controlled intersections), SimTraffic traffic modeling software and SIDRA (for roundabout intersections). Results were measured in delay, level of service (LOS) and 95th percentile queue length. Synchro is based on the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2010) methodology. SimTraffic integrates established driver behaviours and characteristics to simulate actual conditions by randomly “seeding” or positioning vehicles travelling throughout the network. The simulation is run five times (five different random seedings of vehicle types, behaviours and arrivals) to obtain statistical significance of the results. SIDRA provides results using HCM 2010 methodology as well. SIDRA and Synchro uses measures of effectiveness to return the results of the analysis.

Levels of Service

Traffic operations are typically described in terms of levels of service, which rates the amount of delay per vehicle for each movement and the entire intersection. Levels of service range from LOS A (representing best operations) to LOS E/F (LOS E being poor operations and LOS F being unpredictable/disruptive operations). LOS E/F are generally unacceptable levels of service under normal everyday conditions.

The hierarchy of criteria for grading an intersection or movement not only includes delay times, but also takes into account traffic control type (stop signs or traffic signal). For example, if a vehicle is delayed for 19 seconds at an unsignalized intersection, it is considered to have an average operation, and would therefore be graded as an LOS C. However, at a signalized intersection, a 19 second delay would be considered a good operation and therefore it would be given an LOS B. The table below indicates the range of delay for LOS for signalized and unsignalized intersections.

Table A1: LOS Criteria, by Intersection Traffic Control

Level of Service Unsignalized Intersection Average Vehicle Delay (sec/veh) Signalized Intersection Average Vehicle Delay (sec/veh)
A Less than 10 Less than 10
B 10 to 15 11 to 20
C 15 to 25 20 to 35
D 25 to 35 35 to 55
E 35 to 50 55 to 80
F More than 50 More than 80
Page 262–263
Extracted from: 2020 11 03 Council Agenda - Agenda - Pdf