This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Council Meeting/Documents/CRD Core Area Wastewater Service Area - Allocated Flow Capacities (October 2019)
Appendix

CRD Core Area Wastewater Service Area - Allocated Flow Capacities (October 2019)

June 16, 2020Page 2091 section

A revised draft map of Schedule A to Bylaw 2312, detailing allocated flow capacities as of October 2019.

1 CALL TO ORDER
October 2019108.00 MLD total allocation

CRD Core Area Wastewater Service Area Appendix B

Allocated Flow Capacities to Participants

Schedule A to Bylaw 2312 as Amended by Bylaw _____

October 2019

Notes:

  1. ADWF = Average Dry Weather Flow (June 1 to August 31). PWWF = Peak Wet Weather Flow. L/s = Litres per second. MLD = Mega Litres per day.
  2. The ADWF Allocations are based the Core Area Wastewater Treatment Program where the total ADWF plant capacity of 108 MLD was allocated out to each participant based on their requested capacity.
  3. PWWF is based on 4xADWF which the maximum flow allowed at McLoughlin WWTP as approved by the Ministry of Environment. These allocations will be available when the upgrades identified on the map are completed. Capacity upgrade at the Craigflower Pump Station can be achieved by forcemain twinning. Pump upgrades are not required to meet the PWWF allocation.
  4. Total peak flows may not add cumulatively at downstream locations due to system attenuation (population based on Harmon peaking factor).
  5. Inflow allocations may not add cumulatively to participant totals due to cross boundary connections.
  6. Location and extent of future CRD sewers and facilities as depicted are preliminary and may change in accordance with the final system design.
  7. Allocations are available up until the capacity at McLoughlin WWTP has been reached. New infrastructure and reallocation of flows will then be required.
  8. Note some infrastructure is currently being constructed as part of the Core Area Wastewater Treatment Project but is shown as existing on this map.
  9. Flow allocations for Humber and Rutland are based on those catchments being separated from the storm system.

Participant Allocation of Design Capacity

Participant Allocation of Design Capacity as measured by ADWF (MLD)
Colwood 4.7
Esquimalt 7.1
Esquimalt Nation 0.1
Songhees Nation 0.7
Langford 14.1
Oak Bay 6.6
Saanich 32.9
Victoria 38.3
View Royal 3.5
Total 108.00

Centrate Line

Inflow ID Name ADWF Allocation (L/s) PWWF Allocation (L/s)
14 Centrate Line 45.0 45.0

Leachate Line

Inflow ID Name ADWF Allocation (L/s) PWWF Allocation (L/s)
15 Leachate Line 39.2 39.2

City of Langford

Inflow ID Inflow Name ADWF Allocation (L/s) PWWF Allocation** (L/s)
1 Meaford 163.5 654.0
Meaford (Colwood) 0.4 1.4
2 Parsons 163.5 654.0
3 Craigflower PS 163.5 654.0
28 Macaulay Point PS 163.5 654.0
Total 163.5 654.0

City of Colwood

Inflow ID Inflow Name ADWF Allocation (L/s) PWWF Allocation** (L/s)
2 Parsons 54.4 217.5
3 Craigflower PS 54.4 217.5
28 Macaulay Point PS 54.4 217.5
Total 54.4 217.5

Town of View Royal (**See Note 3)

Inflow ID Inflow Name ADWF Allocation (L/s) PWWF Allocation (L/s)
3 Craigflower PS 41.0 164.0
4 Shoreline Trunk** 1.6 6.4
28 Macaulay Point PS 41.0 164.0
Total 41.0 164.0

Songhees Nation

Inflow ID Inflow Name ADWF Allocation (L/s) PWWF Allocation (L/s)
6 Songhees Nation 6.8 27.1
4 Shoreline Trunk** 6.8 27.1
3 Craigflower PS 6.8 27.1
8 Maplebank 0.1 0.5
28 Macaulay Point PS 7.3 29.3
Total 7.3 29.3

Esquimalt Nation

Inflow ID Inflow Name ADWF Allocation (L/s) PWWF Allocation (L/s)
7 Esquimalt Nation 1.2 4.7
4 Shoreline Trunk** 1.2 4.7
3 Craigflower PS 1.2 4.7
28 Macaulay Point PS 1.2 4.7
Total 1.2 4.7

Township of Esquimalt

Inflow ID Inflow Name ADWF Allocation (L/s) PWWF Allocation (L/s)
3 Craigflower PS 1.4 5.7
4 Shoreline Trunk 1.4 5.7
5 Esquimalt Panhandle 1.4 5.7
9a Lang Cove PS (DND) 5.8 23.1
9b Lang Cove PS (Esquimalt) 9.0 35.9
10 Dockyard (DND) 6.8 27.2
Dockyard (Esquimalt) 4.9 19.6
11 Kinver 5.1 20.4
12 Pooley Place 0.7 2.8
21 Devonshire (Esquimalt) 21.0 83.9
Devonshire (Songhees Nation) 0.4 1.5
24 Wilson (Esquimalt) 4.2 16.6
Wilson (Victoria) 0.1 0.4
26 Head (DND) 2.9 11.4
Head (Esquimalt) 16.5 66.1
27 Anson (DND) 2.8 11.2
28 Macaulay Point PS 82.1 328.5
Total 82.1 328.5

District of Saanich

Inflow ID Inflow Name ADWF Allocation (L/s) PWWF Allocation (L/s)
13 Marigold PS 152.7 610.9
16 City Boundary 73.2 292.7
19 Harriet 37.8 151.1
28 Macaulay Point PS 266.7 1066.8
29 Townley 2.0 8.2
30 Haultain 6.6 26.3
33 Arbutus 81.9 327.7
34 Haro - Uvic 9.2 36.7
35 Penrhyn LS (Saanich) 10.7 42.9
Penrhyn LS (Oak Bay) 0.1 0.2
44 Clover Point PS 113.9 455.7
Total 380.6 1522.5

City of Victoria

Inflow ID Inflow Name ADWF Allocation (L/s) PWWF Allocation (L/s)
17 Cecelia (Victoria) 33.5 133.9
Cecelia (Saanich) 2.8 11.0
18 Chapman and Gorge (Victoria) 3.9 15.6
Chapman and Gorge (Saanich) 0.2 1.0
20 Selkirk (Victoria) 2.6 10.5
Selkirk (Esquimalt) 0.6 2.3
22 Langford-Vic West (Victoria) 1.9 7.5
Langford-Vic West (Esquimalt) 0.3 1.3
23 Hereward 22.1 88.2
25 Sea Terrace (Victoria) 3.6 14.5
Sea Terrace (Esquimalt) 0.2 0.8
28 Macaulay Point PS 67.7 270.6
31 Trent Net (Victoria) 81.5 325.9
Trent Net (Saanich) 2.9 11.5
41 Hollywood (Victoria) 4.0 15.9
Hollywood (Oak Bay) 2.3 9.3
42 Olive 266.0 1064.1
43 Clover Net 22.2 88.9
44 Clover Point PS 375.6 1502.4
Total 443.3 1773.0

District of Oak Bay

Inflow ID Inflow Name ADWF Allocation (L/s) PWWF Allocation (L/s)
32 Windsor 5.0 19.9
36 Humber 7.1 28.4
37 Rutland 4.4 17.8
38 Currie Net (Oak Bay) 38.5 154.2
Currie Net (Victoria) 1.9 7.4
Currie Net (Saanich) 0.6 2.4
39 Currie Lift Station (Oak Bay) 19.2 76.7
Currie Lift Station (Victoria) 0.03 0.13
40 Harling Point PS 2.3 9.3
44 Clover Point PS 76.6 306.5
Total 76.6 306.5
Page 209
Extracted from: 2020 06 16 Council Agenda - Agenda - Pdf