This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Council Meeting/Documents/TOWN OF VIEW ROYAL MINUTES OF A PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2020
Minutes

TOWN OF VIEW ROYAL MINUTES OF A PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2020

December 1, 2020Pages 6–185 sections

Minutes from a public hearing regarding the rezoning of 9 Erskine Lane to allow for a 336-unit rental development.

3. MINUTES, RECEIPT & ADOPTION OF (motion to adopt)
November 17, 20209 Erskine Lane336 units in four five-storey buildings847 notices mailed to residents within 400mMeeting terminated at 8:08 p.m.

TOWN OF VIEW ROYAL

Page 6–18

MINUTES OF A PUBLIC HEARING

Page 6–18

HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2020

VIEW ROYAL MUNICIPAL OFFICE - COUNCIL CHAMBERS UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE EMERGENCY PROGRAM ACT MINISTERIAL ORDER NO. M192

PRESENT WERE:

  • Mayor David Screech
  • Councillor Kowalewich
  • Councillor Lemon
  • Councillor Mattson
  • Councillor Rogers

REGRETS: None

PRESENT ALSO:

  • K. Anema, Chief Administrative Officer
  • S. Jones, Director of Corporate Administration
  • L. Chase, Director of Development Services
  • D. Christensen, Director of Finance
  • J. Rosenberg, Director of Engineering
  • S. Vella, Manager of Accounting
  • J. Chow, Senior Planner
  • J. Davison, Community Planner
  • E. Bolster, Deputy Corporate Officer
  • J. Cochrane, Executive Assistant

30 members of the public
0 members of the press

  1. CALL TO ORDER – Mayor Screech called the Public Hearing to order at 7:00 p.m.

The Mayor acknowledged that the meeting is being held on the traditional territory of the Songhees Nation and Esquimalt Nation.

  1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA

MOVED BY: Councillor Rogers
SECONDED: Councillor Mattson

THAT the agenda be amended to include items 5(a)(4)(ax-bb);

AND THAT the agenda be approved as amended. CARRIED

  1. PUBLIC HEARING

a) Statement of Public Hearing Procedure

Mayor Screech made a brief statement regarding the procedures for public hearings.

b) Statement of Publication of Public Hearing

The Community Planner advised that the notice that advertised this Public Hearing was posted on the notice board at Town Hall on November 4, 2020. The notice was also advertised in two consecutive issues of a newspaper being the Times Colonist on Thursday, November 12, 2020 and Friday, November 13, 2020. A total of approximately 847 notices were mailed on November 4, 2020 to owners and residents of land located within a 400 metre radius of the subject property.

  1. REPORTS

4.1 STAFF REPORTS

a) Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014, Amendment Bylaw No. 1059, 2020 to Rezone 9 Erskine Lane to CD-25: Erskine Lane Residential

  1. Report dated November 12, 2020 from the Community Planner

The Community Planner summarized the report for Council, noting the proposed rezoning for 9 Erskine Lane is to allow a purpose-built rental development for twenty years – secured by covenant – in four five-storey buildings with 336 units and a floor space ratio of 1.5 for Subzone A and 1.15 for Subzone B.

Council and staff discussed building height and whether Watkiss Way and Erskine Lane are development cost charge eligible roads.

MOVED BY: Councillor Rogers
SECONDED: Councillor Kowalewich

THAT the report dated November 12, 2020 from the Community Planner titled “Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014, Amendment Bylaw No. 1059, 2020 to Rezone 9 Erskine Lane to CD-25: Erskine Lane Residential” be received for information. CARRIED

4.2 OTHER REPORTS

  1. BYLAWS FOR CONSIDERATION

a) Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014, Amendment Bylaw No. 1059, 2020
A Bylaw to Amend the Town of View Royal Zoning Bylaw with Respect to Creating the CD-25 Zone and with Respect to the Rezoning of 9 Erskine Lane

  1. Comments from Municipal Staff
    As above.

  2. Comments from the Applicant
    S. Alexander, WestUrban Developments, gave a presentation to Council regarding the rezoning application for 9 Erskine Lane, specifically, planning and engagement, details of the proposal, transportation improvements, and benefits of the proposed development.

Council and the applicant discussed tree removal and protection, playground installation, height of Building A, electric vehicle charging stations, bicycle storage with e-bike charging stations, construction of a trail, and protection of Craigflower Creek from stormwater run-off.

  1. Comments from the Public

a) G. Creed, 5 Erskine Lane, stated his support for the rezoning, noting he feels this is a reasonable project for the site. He is in favour of higher density and affordable housing.

b) S. Davies, Metchosin resident, stated her support for the rezoning, noting this is an environmentally conscious plan that offers many amenities and the developer has responded to concerns of the surrounding residents and Council. She also noted that affordable rental housing is needed in the region and this development offers viable options for housing.

c) G. Adams, 9 Erskine Lane, stated his support for the rezoning and noted this development is within the Official Community Plan redevelopment area and will provide much needed rental housing and amenities in the neighbourhood.

d) J. Adams, View Royal resident, stated his support for the rezoning and noted this development is a great opportunity for View Royal to grow and provides much needed rental housing.

e) J. Devonshire, 242 Glenairlie Drive, questioned the size and species of trees that will be planted on the site. The applicant, S. Alexander, noted that replacement trees are listed in the landscape plan and most will be replaced with native plantings.

f) D. Girgull, questioned whether the developer will make a commitment in writing to Council and residents regarding tree protection. The applicant, S. Alexander, noted a plan has been provided to Council and 428 trees will be retained and 250 trees will be replanted.

g) J. Adams, 2139 Meadowvale Drive, stated her support for the rezoning, noting this provides much needed affordable housing close to the Victoria General Hospital for its employees.

  1. Correspondence

a) Letter dated November 12, 2020 from S. Roy, Chief Executive Officer, WestUrban Developments, Re: Right of First Refusal – 9 Erskine Lane Rental Apartment

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the letter dated November 12, 2020 from S. Roy, Chief Executive Officer, WestUrban Development, Re: Right of First Refusal – 9 Erskine Lane Rental Apartment be received. CARRIED

b) Email dated November 12, 2020 from G. Adams, 9 Erskine Lane, Re: 9 Erskine Lane – WestUrban Developments

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated November 12, 2020 from G. Adams, 9 Erskine Lane, Re: 9 Erskine Lane – WestUrban Developments be received. CARRIED

c) Letter received October 28, 2020 from J. Adams, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the letter received October 28, 2020 from J. Adams, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

d) Letter dated October 28, 2020 from J. Adams, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the letter dated October 28, 2020 from J. Adams, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

e) Letter dated October 19, 2020 from G. Adams, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the letter dated October 19, 2020 from G. Adams, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

f) Email dated October 16, 2020 from M. Hankewich, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated October 16, 2020 from M. Hankewich, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

g) Email dated October 14, 2020 from E. Korol, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated October 14, 2020 from E. Korol, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

h) Email dated September 21, 2020 from K. & L. Gilbert, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated September 21, 2020 from K. & L. Gilbert, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

Page 6–18

i) Email dated September 21, 2020 from M. Niven & M. Flynn, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated September 21, 2020 from M. Niven & M. Flynn, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

j) Email dated September 15, 2020 from K. Gilbert, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated September 15, 2020 from K. Gilbert, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

k) Email dated September 15, 2020 from J. Skrlac, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated September 15, 2020 from J. Skrlac, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

l) Email dated September 15, 2020 from L. Jeaurond, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated September 15, 2020 from L. Jeaurond, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

m) Email dated September 14, 2020 from K. Gilbert, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated September 14, 2020 from K. Gilbert, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

n) Email dated September 14, 2020 from A. & S. Engelhardt, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated September 14, 2020 from A. & S. Engelhardt, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

o) Letter dated September 14, 2020 from G. Warren-Adams, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the letter dated September 14, 2020 from G. Warren-Adams, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

p) Email dated September 14, 2020 from G. Balkan, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated September 14, 2020 from G. Balkan, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

q) Email dated September 13, 2020 from J. Hyndman, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated September 13, 2020 from J. Hyndman, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

r) Letter dated September 13, 2020 from D. Lamoureux, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the letter dated September 13, 2020 from D. Lamoureux, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

s) Email dated September 13, 2020 from M. Garrett, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated September 13, 2020 from M. Garrett, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

t) Email dated September 12, 2020 from G. Daniels, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated September 12, 2020 from G. Daniels, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

u) Email dated September 12, 2020 from K. & L. Gilbert, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated September 12, 2020 from K. & L. Gilbert, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

v) Email dated September 11, 2020 from R. Champagne, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated September 11, 2020 from R. Champagne, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

w) Email dated September 11, 2020 from J. Cameron, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated September 11, 2020 from J. Cameron, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

x) Email dated September 9, 2020 from M. Niven, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated September 9, 2020 from M. Niven, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

y) Letter dated September 8, 2020 from the Adams Family, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the letter dated September 8, 2020 from the Adams Family, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

z) Email dated September 7, 2020 from R. & J. Clarke, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated September 7, 2020 from R. & J. Clarke, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

aa) Email dated September 4, 2020 from L. Meilleur, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated September 4, 2020 from L. Meilleur, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

ab) Email dated September 2, 2020 from C. & N. Stewart, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated September 2, 2020 from C. & N. Stewart, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

ac) Email dated September 1, 2020 from C. Hiles & D. Woods, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated September 1, 2020 from C. Hiles & D. Woods, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

ad) Email dated September 2, 2020 from M. Rose, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated September 2, 2020 from M. Rose, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

ae) Letter dated August 29, 2020 from G. Barnes, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the letter dated August 29, 2020 from G. Barnes, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

af) Letter dated August 28, 2020 from S. & R. May, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the letter dated August 28, 2020 from S. & R. May, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

ag) Email dated August 28, 2020 from C. Kitson, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated August 28, 2020 from C. Kitson, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

ah) Email dated July 21, 2020 from J. Skrlac, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated July 21, 2020 from J. Skrlac, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

ai) Email dated July 21, 2020 from J. Devonshire, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated July 21, 2020 from J. Devonshire, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

aj) Email dated July 21, 2020 from L. Jeaurond, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

Page 6–18

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated July 21, 2020 from L. Jeaurond, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

ak) Email dated July 21, 2020 from M. Cittone, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated July 21, 2020 from M. Cittone, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

al) Email dated July 21, 2020 from I. Brown, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated July 21, 2020 from I. Brown, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

am) Email dated July 20, 2020 from K. Smith, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated July 20, 2020 from K. Smith, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

an) Email dated July 19, 2020 from L. Liwiski, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated July 19, 2020 from L. Liwiski, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

ao) Email dated June 15, 2020 from K. & L. Gilbert, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated June 15, 2020 from K. & L. Gilbert, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

ap) Email dated June 14, 2020 from J. Cameron, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated June 14, 2020 from J. Cameron, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

aq) Email dated June 13, 2020 from S. & R. May, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated June 13, 2020 from S. & R. May, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

ar) Email dated June 13, 2020 from C. Kitson, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated June 13, 2020 from C. Kitson, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

as) Email dated June 16, 2020 from L. Jeaurond, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated June 16, 2020 from L. Jeaurond, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

at) Email dated June 16, 2020 from J. Skrlac, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated June 16, 2020 from J. Skrlac, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

au) Email dated June 16, 2020 from D. & H. Eliason, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated June 16, 2020 from D. & H. Eliason, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

av) Email dated June 15, 2020 from A. & M. Soutar, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated June 15, 2020 from A. & M. Soutar, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

aw) Email dated June 15, 2020 from J. Devonshire, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated June 15, 2020 from J. Devonshire, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

ax) Email dated November 14, 2020 from L. Liwiski, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated November 14, 2020 from L. Liwiski, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

ay) Email dated November 16, 2020 from D. Lamoureux, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated November 16, 2020 from D. Lamoureux, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

az) Email dated November 16, 2020 from I. Brown, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated November 16, 2020 from I. Brown, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

ba) Email dated November 17, 2020 from P. & G. Mantell, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated November 17, 2020 from P. & G. Mantell, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

bb) Email dated November 17, 2020 from A. Provost and M. Powell, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane

MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon

THAT the email dated November 17, 2020 from A. Provost and M. Powell, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED

  1. TERMINATION

MOVED BY: Councillor Lemon
SECONDED: Councillor Kowalewich

THAT this meeting now terminate.
Time: 8:08 p.m. CARRIED

Page 6–18

Document Images

(1)
Document image
Extracted from: 2020 12 01 Council Agenda - Agenda - Pdf