TOWN OF VIEW ROYAL MINUTES OF A PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2020
Minutes from a public hearing regarding the rezoning of 9 Erskine Lane to allow for a 336-unit rental development.
TOWN OF VIEW ROYAL
MINUTES OF A PUBLIC HEARING
HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2020
VIEW ROYAL MUNICIPAL OFFICE - COUNCIL CHAMBERS UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE EMERGENCY PROGRAM ACT MINISTERIAL ORDER NO. M192
PRESENT WERE:
- Mayor David Screech
- Councillor Kowalewich
- Councillor Lemon
- Councillor Mattson
- Councillor Rogers
REGRETS: None
PRESENT ALSO:
- K. Anema, Chief Administrative Officer
- S. Jones, Director of Corporate Administration
- L. Chase, Director of Development Services
- D. Christensen, Director of Finance
- J. Rosenberg, Director of Engineering
- S. Vella, Manager of Accounting
- J. Chow, Senior Planner
- J. Davison, Community Planner
- E. Bolster, Deputy Corporate Officer
- J. Cochrane, Executive Assistant
30 members of the public
0 members of the press
- CALL TO ORDER – Mayor Screech called the Public Hearing to order at 7:00 p.m.
The Mayor acknowledged that the meeting is being held on the traditional territory of the Songhees Nation and Esquimalt Nation.
- APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOVED BY: Councillor Rogers
SECONDED: Councillor Mattson
THAT the agenda be amended to include items 5(a)(4)(ax-bb);
AND THAT the agenda be approved as amended. CARRIED
- PUBLIC HEARING
a) Statement of Public Hearing Procedure
Mayor Screech made a brief statement regarding the procedures for public hearings.
b) Statement of Publication of Public Hearing
The Community Planner advised that the notice that advertised this Public Hearing was posted on the notice board at Town Hall on November 4, 2020. The notice was also advertised in two consecutive issues of a newspaper being the Times Colonist on Thursday, November 12, 2020 and Friday, November 13, 2020. A total of approximately 847 notices were mailed on November 4, 2020 to owners and residents of land located within a 400 metre radius of the subject property.
- REPORTS
4.1 STAFF REPORTS
a) Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014, Amendment Bylaw No. 1059, 2020 to Rezone 9 Erskine Lane to CD-25: Erskine Lane Residential
- Report dated November 12, 2020 from the Community Planner
The Community Planner summarized the report for Council, noting the proposed rezoning for 9 Erskine Lane is to allow a purpose-built rental development for twenty years – secured by covenant – in four five-storey buildings with 336 units and a floor space ratio of 1.5 for Subzone A and 1.15 for Subzone B.
Council and staff discussed building height and whether Watkiss Way and Erskine Lane are development cost charge eligible roads.
MOVED BY: Councillor Rogers
SECONDED: Councillor Kowalewich
THAT the report dated November 12, 2020 from the Community Planner titled “Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014, Amendment Bylaw No. 1059, 2020 to Rezone 9 Erskine Lane to CD-25: Erskine Lane Residential” be received for information. CARRIED
4.2 OTHER REPORTS
- BYLAWS FOR CONSIDERATION
a) Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014, Amendment Bylaw No. 1059, 2020
A Bylaw to Amend the Town of View Royal Zoning Bylaw with Respect to Creating the CD-25 Zone and with Respect to the Rezoning of 9 Erskine Lane
Comments from Municipal Staff
As above.Comments from the Applicant
S. Alexander, WestUrban Developments, gave a presentation to Council regarding the rezoning application for 9 Erskine Lane, specifically, planning and engagement, details of the proposal, transportation improvements, and benefits of the proposed development.
Council and the applicant discussed tree removal and protection, playground installation, height of Building A, electric vehicle charging stations, bicycle storage with e-bike charging stations, construction of a trail, and protection of Craigflower Creek from stormwater run-off.
- Comments from the Public
a) G. Creed, 5 Erskine Lane, stated his support for the rezoning, noting he feels this is a reasonable project for the site. He is in favour of higher density and affordable housing.
b) S. Davies, Metchosin resident, stated her support for the rezoning, noting this is an environmentally conscious plan that offers many amenities and the developer has responded to concerns of the surrounding residents and Council. She also noted that affordable rental housing is needed in the region and this development offers viable options for housing.
c) G. Adams, 9 Erskine Lane, stated his support for the rezoning and noted this development is within the Official Community Plan redevelopment area and will provide much needed rental housing and amenities in the neighbourhood.
d) J. Adams, View Royal resident, stated his support for the rezoning and noted this development is a great opportunity for View Royal to grow and provides much needed rental housing.
e) J. Devonshire, 242 Glenairlie Drive, questioned the size and species of trees that will be planted on the site. The applicant, S. Alexander, noted that replacement trees are listed in the landscape plan and most will be replaced with native plantings.
f) D. Girgull, questioned whether the developer will make a commitment in writing to Council and residents regarding tree protection. The applicant, S. Alexander, noted a plan has been provided to Council and 428 trees will be retained and 250 trees will be replanted.
g) J. Adams, 2139 Meadowvale Drive, stated her support for the rezoning, noting this provides much needed affordable housing close to the Victoria General Hospital for its employees.
- Correspondence
a) Letter dated November 12, 2020 from S. Roy, Chief Executive Officer, WestUrban Developments, Re: Right of First Refusal – 9 Erskine Lane Rental Apartment
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the letter dated November 12, 2020 from S. Roy, Chief Executive Officer, WestUrban Development, Re: Right of First Refusal – 9 Erskine Lane Rental Apartment be received. CARRIED
b) Email dated November 12, 2020 from G. Adams, 9 Erskine Lane, Re: 9 Erskine Lane – WestUrban Developments
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated November 12, 2020 from G. Adams, 9 Erskine Lane, Re: 9 Erskine Lane – WestUrban Developments be received. CARRIED
c) Letter received October 28, 2020 from J. Adams, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the letter received October 28, 2020 from J. Adams, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
d) Letter dated October 28, 2020 from J. Adams, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the letter dated October 28, 2020 from J. Adams, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
e) Letter dated October 19, 2020 from G. Adams, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the letter dated October 19, 2020 from G. Adams, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
f) Email dated October 16, 2020 from M. Hankewich, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated October 16, 2020 from M. Hankewich, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
g) Email dated October 14, 2020 from E. Korol, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated October 14, 2020 from E. Korol, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
h) Email dated September 21, 2020 from K. & L. Gilbert, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated September 21, 2020 from K. & L. Gilbert, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
i) Email dated September 21, 2020 from M. Niven & M. Flynn, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated September 21, 2020 from M. Niven & M. Flynn, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
j) Email dated September 15, 2020 from K. Gilbert, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated September 15, 2020 from K. Gilbert, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
k) Email dated September 15, 2020 from J. Skrlac, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated September 15, 2020 from J. Skrlac, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
l) Email dated September 15, 2020 from L. Jeaurond, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated September 15, 2020 from L. Jeaurond, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
m) Email dated September 14, 2020 from K. Gilbert, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated September 14, 2020 from K. Gilbert, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
n) Email dated September 14, 2020 from A. & S. Engelhardt, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated September 14, 2020 from A. & S. Engelhardt, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
o) Letter dated September 14, 2020 from G. Warren-Adams, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the letter dated September 14, 2020 from G. Warren-Adams, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
p) Email dated September 14, 2020 from G. Balkan, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated September 14, 2020 from G. Balkan, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
q) Email dated September 13, 2020 from J. Hyndman, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated September 13, 2020 from J. Hyndman, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
r) Letter dated September 13, 2020 from D. Lamoureux, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the letter dated September 13, 2020 from D. Lamoureux, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
s) Email dated September 13, 2020 from M. Garrett, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated September 13, 2020 from M. Garrett, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
t) Email dated September 12, 2020 from G. Daniels, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated September 12, 2020 from G. Daniels, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
u) Email dated September 12, 2020 from K. & L. Gilbert, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated September 12, 2020 from K. & L. Gilbert, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
v) Email dated September 11, 2020 from R. Champagne, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated September 11, 2020 from R. Champagne, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
w) Email dated September 11, 2020 from J. Cameron, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated September 11, 2020 from J. Cameron, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
x) Email dated September 9, 2020 from M. Niven, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated September 9, 2020 from M. Niven, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
y) Letter dated September 8, 2020 from the Adams Family, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the letter dated September 8, 2020 from the Adams Family, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
z) Email dated September 7, 2020 from R. & J. Clarke, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated September 7, 2020 from R. & J. Clarke, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
aa) Email dated September 4, 2020 from L. Meilleur, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated September 4, 2020 from L. Meilleur, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
ab) Email dated September 2, 2020 from C. & N. Stewart, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated September 2, 2020 from C. & N. Stewart, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
ac) Email dated September 1, 2020 from C. Hiles & D. Woods, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated September 1, 2020 from C. Hiles & D. Woods, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
ad) Email dated September 2, 2020 from M. Rose, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated September 2, 2020 from M. Rose, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
ae) Letter dated August 29, 2020 from G. Barnes, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the letter dated August 29, 2020 from G. Barnes, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
af) Letter dated August 28, 2020 from S. & R. May, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the letter dated August 28, 2020 from S. & R. May, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
ag) Email dated August 28, 2020 from C. Kitson, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated August 28, 2020 from C. Kitson, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
ah) Email dated July 21, 2020 from J. Skrlac, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated July 21, 2020 from J. Skrlac, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
ai) Email dated July 21, 2020 from J. Devonshire, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated July 21, 2020 from J. Devonshire, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
aj) Email dated July 21, 2020 from L. Jeaurond, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated July 21, 2020 from L. Jeaurond, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
ak) Email dated July 21, 2020 from M. Cittone, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated July 21, 2020 from M. Cittone, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
al) Email dated July 21, 2020 from I. Brown, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated July 21, 2020 from I. Brown, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
am) Email dated July 20, 2020 from K. Smith, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated July 20, 2020 from K. Smith, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
an) Email dated July 19, 2020 from L. Liwiski, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated July 19, 2020 from L. Liwiski, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
ao) Email dated June 15, 2020 from K. & L. Gilbert, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated June 15, 2020 from K. & L. Gilbert, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
ap) Email dated June 14, 2020 from J. Cameron, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated June 14, 2020 from J. Cameron, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
aq) Email dated June 13, 2020 from S. & R. May, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated June 13, 2020 from S. & R. May, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
ar) Email dated June 13, 2020 from C. Kitson, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated June 13, 2020 from C. Kitson, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
as) Email dated June 16, 2020 from L. Jeaurond, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated June 16, 2020 from L. Jeaurond, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
at) Email dated June 16, 2020 from J. Skrlac, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated June 16, 2020 from J. Skrlac, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
au) Email dated June 16, 2020 from D. & H. Eliason, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated June 16, 2020 from D. & H. Eliason, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
av) Email dated June 15, 2020 from A. & M. Soutar, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated June 15, 2020 from A. & M. Soutar, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
aw) Email dated June 15, 2020 from J. Devonshire, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated June 15, 2020 from J. Devonshire, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
ax) Email dated November 14, 2020 from L. Liwiski, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated November 14, 2020 from L. Liwiski, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
ay) Email dated November 16, 2020 from D. Lamoureux, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated November 16, 2020 from D. Lamoureux, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
az) Email dated November 16, 2020 from I. Brown, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated November 16, 2020 from I. Brown, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
ba) Email dated November 17, 2020 from P. & G. Mantell, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated November 17, 2020 from P. & G. Mantell, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
bb) Email dated November 17, 2020 from A. Provost and M. Powell, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane
MOVED BY: Councillor Kowalewich
SECONDED: Councillor Lemon
THAT the email dated November 17, 2020 from A. Provost and M. Powell, Re: Proposed Development – 9 Erskine Lane be received. CARRIED
- TERMINATION
MOVED BY: Councillor Lemon
SECONDED: Councillor Kowalewich
THAT this meeting now terminate.
Time: 8:08 p.m.
CARRIED
