Attachment 9 - B.C. Land Surveyor's Building Location Certificate

Solutions put forward by each rejecting municipality	Content agreed-to by all mediation participants
	conceptual and that municipal conformance may vary. Local planning decisions relating to nodes will not require a Regional Growth Strategy amendment.” (p.17)

Page 126

6 Growth Management

Solutions put forward by each rejecting municipality	Content agreed-to by all mediation participants
24. Amend the “Agricultural Land Reserve” layer related to the Gorge Vale Golf Course should the Agricultural Land Commission (ALC) decide to remove lands from the ALR. Also relates to Economic Development Policy 5.1.4. [Esquimalt: Item 1 and 4]	Amend Map 3 and 4 as suggested, pending decision of the Agricultural Land Commission prior to first and second reading of the RGS bylaw. (p.14 and 16)
25. With respect to language that implies a hierarchy, remove the following words from the Growth Policy Area on p. 10 of the RGS: Where Capital Green Lands and Renewable Resource Lands Policy Areas overlap with the Growth Policy Area, the land use policy for the Capital Green Lands and Renewable Resource Lands Policy Areas shall take precedence.” [View Royal: Item 2]	Retain the description of the “Growth Policy Area” (changed to “Urban Containment Area”) as per the referred RGS. Note that this concern was addressed by Item 18, above. (p.11-12)

Page 126

7 Water

Section 2: Environment and Infrastructure

Solutions put forward by each rejecting municipality	Content agreed-to by all mediation participants
26. Retain water servicing provision from the 2003 RGS (i.e., no water servicing outside the Regional Urban Containment and Servicing Policy Area [RUCSPA]). [Highlands – 1 and View Royal – 3]	See Item 28, below.
27. Retain water servicing policy (Policy 2.2.2) as written in the 2016 RGS. [Metchosin, JdF EA] Note that for the JdF EA, Policy 2.2.2 represents a compromise from a previous position. Note that Metchosin has remained entirely outside the RUCSPA, but has access to CRD piped water. Through the OCP and the RCS, Metchosin uses land use tools to limit development potential to levels identified in the 1996 OCP.

Solutions put forward by each rejecting municipality

Content agreed-to by all mediation participants

26. Retain water servicing provision from the 2003 RGS (i.e., no water servicing outside the Regional Urban Containment and Servicing Policy Area [RUCSPA]). [Highlands – 1 and View Royal – 3]

See Item 28, below.

27. Retain water servicing policy (Policy 2.2.2) as written in the 2016 RGS. [Metchosin, JdF EA]

Note that for the JdF EA, Policy 2.2.2 represents a compromise from a previous position.

Note that Metchosin has remained entirely outside the RUCSPA, but has access to CRD piped water. Through the OCP and the RCS, Metchosin uses land use tools to limit development potential to levels identified in the 1996 OCP.

Page 126