Staff Report
Attachment 17 - DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREA GUIDELINES - REVIEW
February 2, 2016Pages 49–553 sections
Planning staff evaluation of how the proposed development aligns with View Royal's Mixed Residential guidelines.
January 26, 2016Reviewer: Jeff Chow
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREA GUIDELINES -REVIEW

| Application Number: | 3060-20-2015/12 |
|---|---|
| Address: | 102 Atkins Road |
| Legal Description: | Parcel A (DD L2503) of Lot 6, Section 98, Esquimalt District, Plan 748, |
| Applicant: | Brian Trenacher, En Enviro Tec |
| Description: | Nine detached residential units |
| Plan Details: | Victoria Design (January 25, 2016); Westbrook Consulting Ltd. (July 2, 2015); DE Landscape Solutions (January 26, 2016) |
| Reviewer: | Jeff Chow |
| Date: | January 26, 2016 |
Page 49–55
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREA: MIXED RESIDENTIAL
Design Character

| Guidelines | Proposal |
|---|---|
| i. Residential buildings should address the public realm and contribute to a positive pedestrian-friendly streetscape. | The site topography does not allow residential buildings to address the public realm but does provide over sight of the pedestrian streetscape. |
| ii. The exterior design and finish of new developments should be compatible with, and complementary to, existing housing in the neighbourhood. | The exterior design and finish of new developments would be compatible with, and complementary to, existing housing in the neighbourhood because similar forms and materials would be used |
| iii. Buildings should express a unified architectural concept that expresses both variation and consistency. | |
| iv. Materials should be durable and of high quality, reflecting the natural surroundings of View Royal and a "West Coast" design character, and bring in elements of wood, stone and a natural colour palette. Natural materials are preferred. | iv. The building elevations show materials appear be durable and of high quality, reflecting the natural surroundings of View Royal and a "West Coast" design character, and bring in elements of wood, stone and a natural colour palette. |
| v. Building design should promote "eyes on the street" for natural surveillance of the public realm through the provision of entrances, windows, patios, balconies, porches and | While the units would be separated from the Galloping Goose Trail, the presence of residential building nearby will enhance public safety in this area. |

Public and Pedestrian Realm
| Guidelines | Proposal |
|---|---|
| i. Streetscape design should incorporate treatments that enhance the pedestrian experience and create a sense of local identity. | currently the frontage is overgrown and does not provide separate pedestrian space |
| ii. Streetscape should incorporate a continuous planting of irrigated deciduous street trees on both sides of the street where possible. | Mature trees in the streetscape are in place. |
| iii. Where possible, corner and bus bulges should be incorporated into the streetscape design to enhance pedestrian crossings and provide space for landscaping and seating. | Improvements to pedestrian crossings and space for landscaping and seating will be investigated in the servicing stage |
| iv. Site and building design should incorporate the basic principles of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED). | Site and building design generally incorporate the basic principles of CPTED. |
Siting, Height and Massing

Landscaping
| Guidelines | Proposal |
|---|---|
| i. Retain mature trees and, wherever possible, established vegetation, especially around natural features (e.g. creeks, ponds, slopes | The site was laid out with the assistance of a certified arborist to maximize tree retention and minimize impacts. |

Page 49–55
| Guidelines | Proposal |
|---|---|
| and rocky outcroppings) for visual interest and to limit disruption of natural systems. | |
| ii. Utilize native species wherever possible in site landscaping. Invasive or nuisance species (e.g. English Ivy, Broom) should not be used. Plants should be chosen for seasonal interest and compatibility with the local climate. Large expanses of lawn are not encouraged. | Native species will be provided as part of site landscaping. Invasive or nuisance species (e.g. English Ivy, Broom) will not be used. Ornamental plant species have been chosen for seasonal interest and compatibility with the local climate. Lawn areas have been minimized. |
| iii. Space for private or communal gardening and the use of native plants, edible plants, berry bushes and fruit trees in landscaping is encouraged. | Space for private or communal gardening and the use of native plants, edible plants, berry bushes and fruit trees in landscaping is available. |
| iv. Use a combination of soft and hard landscape elements to create functional and visually appealing private and semi-private outdoor space. | Soft and hard landscape elements including privacy screens provided. |
| v. Define the transition from public to private space with hard and/or soft landscape elements such as low hedging, low solid or a combination of permeable/transparent fencing (such as wrought iron above a solid base). | Define the transition from public to private space is defined by the driveway entrance and natural topography. |
| vi. Landscaping of townhouse and apartment developments should contribute to a pedestrian-friendly streetscape, by providing street trees and other plantings to soften building edges, provide visual interest and establish a sense of pedestrian enclosure. | n/a |
| vii. Low-rise apartments should consider the inclusion of common gathering areas with age-appropriate features, and sited in such a way as to maximize exposure to sunlight. | n/a |
| viii. Landscape design strategies should be incorporated that minimize stormwater runoff, and promotes the natural infiltration and cleaning of runoff. | The site was designed with minimal impervious surface. |
| ix. Landscaping should incorporate an automatic irrigation system. | Automatic irrigation system to be provided |
| x. All landscaping work and plant material shall conform to the most recent edition of the British Columbia Landscape Standard published by the British Columbia Society of Landscape Architects. | Noted in plans. |
Parking, Access and Circulation


Lighting
Safety
Other

| Guidelines | Proposal |
|---|---|
| Environmental Design (LEED®) or Built Green standards in the design and construction all buildings is highly encouraged. | |
| iii. Incorporation of resource and energy efficiency into the siting, design, construction and maintenance of buildings and structures is highly encouraged. | Site materials such as rock would be reused on site where possible. Layout designed to minimize blasting. |
| iv. Where used, all signage should be architecturally compatible with the style, composition, materials, colours and details of the buildings, with no internal illumination, and method of installation hidden. | n/a |
Page 49–55
Document Images
(8)Extracted from: 2016 02 02 Council Agenda - Pdf
















