This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Council Meeting/Documents/STAFF REPORT: Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014 Housekeeping / Amendments Review
Staff Report

STAFF REPORT: Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014 Housekeeping / Amendments Review

June 7, 2016Pages 91–972 sections

Detailed review of proposed zoning changes including definitions for mobile businesses, setbacks for retaining walls, and home occupation rules.

Proposes adding registered massage therapists and acupuncturists as permitted home occupationsLimits height of non-residential retaining walls to 1.2mAddresses secondary suite parking requirements

TOWN OF VIEW ROYAL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT

TO: Committee of the Whole DATE: March 1, 2016 FROM: James Davison MCIP RPP Planner MEETING DATE: March 8, 2016

ZONING BYLAW NO. 900, 2014 HOUSEKEEPING / AMENDMENTS REVIEW

RECOMMENDATION

THAT Committee receive this report for information.

PURPOSE OF REPORT

To present Committee with a report outlining and summarizing proposed and recommended housekeeping and minor amendments to the Zoning Bylaw approximately 18 months after its adoption.

BACKGROUND

Paragraph explaining that staff have kept notes on required Zoning Bylaw amendments based on feedback and identified practical issues to improve clarity and customer service.
Paragraph explaining that staff have kept notes on required Zoning Bylaw amendments based on feedback and identified practical issues to improve clarity and customer service.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS

The regulations to be amended will be listed here, with the recommended changes in plain language (rather than as drafted bylaw) and explanation immediately below each change. The changes are in the bullet points.

1. Section 2.2: Definitions

  • The definition of Manufactured Home (which combines mobile home and modular home) should be removed.
Text explaining that 'Mobile home' is a prohibited use kept for clarity, while 'Modular home' is a desired constructed form. Combining them has been a regulatory hindrance for Home Occupation uses.
Text explaining that 'Mobile home' is a prohibited use kept for clarity, while 'Modular home' is a desired constructed form. Combining them has been a regulatory hindrance for Home Occupation uses.

2. Section 3.3.2: General Prohibitions

  • Within section 3.3.2.i (General Prohibitions), the mobile business entry is changed to clarify that Intermunicipal Business License uses are not mobile business uses.
Text defining "Mobile Business" as a commercial operation or office use (not a food cart) established on a temporary basis exceeding one hour that changes locations using motorized transportation.
Text defining "Mobile Business" as a commercial operation or office use (not a food cart) established on a temporary basis exceeding one hour that changes locations using motorized transportation.

Mobile businesses are prohibited in all areas of the municipality. Currently it could be construed from this definition that various intermunicipal uses are mobile businesses. This proposed change clarifies that they are not.

3. Section 3.5.1: Setbacks and Siting

  • Specifically exclude ‘fence’ and ‘retaining wall’ from the setbacks to buildings and other structures regulations within the zone tables.
Text stating that fences and retaining walls are structures but have inadvertently been required to conform to setbacks. This change allows them to be regulated through height instead.
Text stating that fences and retaining walls are structures but have inadvertently been required to conform to setbacks. This change allows them to be regulated through height instead.

4. Section 3.8: Special Setbacks

  • No fences and no retaining walls may be permitted within special setbacks or into Environmental Development Permit areas.
Text clarifying that fencing within natural boundary setbacks is not permitted and requires a variance request.
Text clarifying that fencing within natural boundary setbacks is not permitted and requires a variance request.
Text regarding staff questions about goose fencing—low fencing to prevent Canada Geese from moving onto land—along the shores of Portage Inlet, noting it can cause user conflict and barrier to native species. It also states 'Recreational vehicle' should be added to prohibited structures/vehicles in special setback areas.
Text regarding staff questions about goose fencing—low fencing to prevent Canada Geese from moving onto land—along the shores of Portage Inlet, noting it can cause user conflict and barrier to native species. It also states 'Recreational vehicle' should be added to prohibited structures/vehicles in special setback areas.

Section 4.2: Home Occupation

  • Clarify which uses are included and excluded in Home Occupation. In Section 4.2.1.m, the ‘Medical Clinic’ use should be added to the prohibition of Home Occupation uses.

  • Change the prohibition of a Home Occupation use from ‘Manufactured Home’ to ‘Mobile Home’ and ‘Recreational Vehicle’ for clarity.

There is no reason why a home occupation cannot occur in a modular home.

  • Within Level 2 and 3 Home Occupations, Registered Massage Therapists and Registered Acupuncturists should specifically be permitted (despite their inclusion in the Medical Clinic definition) through a ‘notwithstanding’ clause.
Text explaining that 'personal and professional services' in Home Occupations caused confusion regarding 'medical clinic' uses. While dentists and doctors are not desired, RMTs and acupuncturists produce less bio-waste and are better suited for home use.
Text explaining that 'personal and professional services' in Home Occupations caused confusion regarding 'medical clinic' uses. While dentists and doctors are not desired, RMTs and acupuncturists produce less bio-waste and are better suited for home use.

Section 4.8 Fences and Retaining Walls

  • In non-residential zones, the maximum height of a retaining wall should match fence height regulations in those zones unless otherwise specified in the bylaw (a residential/rural residential zone retaining wall has a maximum height of 1.2m).
Text stating there is currently no limitation on the height of a non-residential retaining wall and that this should be fixed.
Text stating there is currently no limitation on the height of a non-residential retaining wall and that this should be fixed.
Diagram showing property lines and a 2m height limit for retaining walls and fences.
Diagram showing property lines and a 2m height limit for retaining walls and fences.
  • Section 4.8.11, which allows a retaining wall to be higher than 1.2m if the lot is cut below the existing grade, should specify a maximum retaining wall height of 2m, in addition to the existing supporting illustration (above) which indicates 2m.
Detail of the retaining wall diagram showing the 2m height measurement.
Detail of the retaining wall diagram showing the 2m height measurement.
  • Add a regulation that, where fences and retaining walls on the same lot are separated by less than one metre, their height is to be calculated together (that is, from the base of the lower to the top of the higher).

Retaining walls require more height consideration than previously, now that fences and retaining walls are separately defined.

  • Regulations should prohibit electrified fences in non-rural zones.
Text explaining that electrified fences came up during a goat vegetation management inquiry. Another option is a ban, though it may conflict with Right to Farm legislation.
Text explaining that electrified fences came up during a goat vegetation management inquiry. Another option is a ban, though it may conflict with Right to Farm legislation.

Table 5.2: Parking and Loading Schedule

  • Generally, uses within the parking table will be changed to match up with the intended and defined uses in the bylaw and

Change is being made for clarity.

Section 5.4: Parking

  • Several uses are to be added to the bicycle parking regulations, such as café and medical clinic.

  • An extra 30cm should be added to the width of parking spaces when they are positioned against a pillar or wall.

Currently it could be interpreted that a maneuvering aisle (a space for maneuvering one vehicle into a spot) is required to get into a spot. This clarifies the accepted standard that garage spaces and driveway spaces should be considered acceptable for supplying required parking spaces. It should be noted that the driveway must be at least the length of a parking space (5.5m) for it to be used as a required parking space.

Section 5.8: Secondary Suite Parking Facilities

  • Staff wishes to explore taking existing garage parking into account when considering secondary suite parking. If there is a double garage on the property, staff proposes to count one of those spaces towards the suite parking requirement.

  • Staff wishes to add a few illustrations to clarify the suite parking requirements.

Suite parking is a source of confusion, frustration and often the limiting factor in obtaining a suite license for many properties. Staff spends a good deal of time on explaining tandem parking and parking configuration issues in conjunction with building permit and secondary suite permit applications. Illustrations would be helpful.

Section 6-11: Zone Tables

  • ‘Floor Area’ in the zone tables needs to be replaced with ‘Floor Space’ to match the definitions in Section 2.2

This is a change for consistency and to match the definition with its intent in the zone tables. This could also be accomplished by stating that ‘floor area’ = ‘floor space’ within the definitions in Section 2.2. This is mainly of concern in the CD zones.

Section 6.4 Residential zones

  • Add a heading to parse it from the ‘Agricultural and Rural Zones’ heading of the previous section.
Page 91–97

This is housekeeping to fix an error.

Section 11.1.1: CD-1 Principal Uses

  • ‘Pharmacy’ added to the permitted uses in the zone.
Text stating the use needs to be added as the Rexall pharmacy on the corner of Glentana and Admirals is a currently lawful non-conforming use.
Text stating the use needs to be added as the Rexall pharmacy on the corner of Glentana and Admirals is a currently lawful non-conforming use.

Section 11.5 CD-5A: Mixed Residential (Small Lot)

  • ‘Mixed Commercial and Residential Use’ must be replaced with ‘Residential, Duplex’, Residential, Townhouse’, and ‘Residential, Rowhouse’ uses.
Text explaining that CD-5A erroneously used 'Mixed Commercial and Residential' instead of 'Residential, Mixed'. The old definition is best represented by adding duplex, rowhouse, and townhouse uses.
Text explaining that CD-5A erroneously used 'Mixed Commercial and Residential' instead of 'Residential, Mixed'. The old definition is best represented by adding duplex, rowhouse, and townhouse uses.
  • FSR (Floor Space Ratio) of 0.45, not to exceed a total of 278m2 (3,000 sq. ft. per lot) must be added back to the zone table.

The FSR regulation was omitted in error.

Section 11.18 CD-19A

  • Maximum Floor Space Ratio of 0.45:1 must be added back into Subzone A

Existed in Land Use Bylaw 1990 No. 35, and omitted in error in the new bylaw.

Schedule 2: Zoning Map

  • Green area below should not be zoned P-6: Thetis Lake Park. It should be zoned P-5: Transportation.

It is owned by the CRD and by the BC Transportation Financing Authority. It is currently mostly used as the Galloping Goose Regional Trail and parking lot/washrooms, and also roadway.

Map showing the "Subject Property" to be rezoned to P-5, located between Atkins Road and the Island Highway, adjacent to the E & N Railway.
Map showing the "Subject Property" to be rezoned to P-5, located between Atkins Road and the Island Highway, adjacent to the E & N Railway.
Detailed map segment of the "Subject Property" near Highbank Rd and the Island Highway.
Detailed map segment of the "Subject Property" near Highbank Rd and the Island Highway.

The permitted principal uses in P-5: Transportation are:

  • Park and Open Space
  • Parking Facilities
  • Railway, including Railway Station
  • Recreation Greenway
  • Transportation Centre or Depot

The permitted accessory uses in P-5 (limited to 25% of the floor area of the principal uses) are:

  • Café
  • Office
  • Restaurant, Full-Service
  • Retail Store
List segment showing "Office", "Restaurant, Full-Service", and "Retail Store".
List segment showing "Office", "Restaurant, Full-Service", and "Retail Store".

These uses are consistent with the current use.

CONCLUSION

RECOMMENDATION

THAT Committee receive this report for information.

SUBMITTED BY James Davison MCIP RPP, Planner

REVIEWED BY Lindsay Chase, MCIP RPP, Director of Development Services

ATTACHMENTS

  1. Correspondence from Rob Booth, RMT and RAc, March 2, 2016
Page 91–97
Extracted from: 2016 06 07 Council Agenda - Pdf