This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Back to Matters
C-80-23GeneralActiveFollow Matter

Ultra-light Rail Pilot Support

First seen: June 20, 2023
Last seen: June 20, 2023

Lifecycle Timeline

June 20, 2023Council
Full Recording

S. Kong, Thinkeco Power Inc./Penmark/AECOM, Re: Testing of Battery Operated Train Technology within the Capital Regional District

"Delegates presented the proposed ultra-light rail technology, emphasizing its quiet, low-cost (estimated $20 million per kilometer), and rapid installation (weeks) nature, contrasting it with traditional SkyTrain extensions. Council raised questions regarding safety and segregation from cyclists/pedestrians (especially if placed on the Galloping Goose), the selection criteria for the 2-3km test site (which would be closed during the test phase), long-term public-private partnership (P3) funding structure, and why View Royal was chosen first. Council expressed general support for the concept's long-term environmental and congestion mitigation potential, but Councillor MacKenzie opposed the resulting motion."
Formal MotionPassed
"THAT Council supports the testing of battery-operated ultra-light train technology in principle; AND THAT staff report back to Council on potential two-to-three kilometre test run sites that may be available in View Royal; AND FURTHER THAT the Town advocate to the Capital Regional District and the Cities of Colwood and Langford to receive the same presentation and encourage the Cities of Colwood and Langford to consider suitable test sites in their municipalities."
Moved by: Gery Lemon
Seconded by: Ron Mattson
Sid Tobias
Don Brown
Damian Kowalewich
Gery Lemon
Alison MacKenzie
Ron Mattson
John Rogers