This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Committee of the Whole/Documents/Staff Report: FORM AND CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT PERMIT – 1499 ADMIRALS RD – ADMIRALS WALK
Staff Report

Staff Report: FORM AND CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT PERMIT – 1499 ADMIRALS RD – ADMIRALS WALK

June 14, 2016Pages 233–2358 sections

Report concerning facade cosmetic upgrades and a comprehensive new signage plan for the shopping mall.

2 APPROVAL OF AGENDA
June 6, 2016Address: 1499 Admirals RoadAims to introduce a natural color palette and wood stone treatments

TOWN OF VIEW ROYAL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT

TO: Committee DATE: June 6, 2016 FROM: J. Davison, MCIP RPP, Planner MEETING DATE: June 14, 2016 FILE NO.: 3060-20-2016-04

FORM AND CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 1499 ADMIRALS RD – ADMIRALS WALK

Page 233–235

RECOMMENDATION

THAT Committee receive this report for information.

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER’S COMMENTS

I concur with the recommendation.

DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES’ COMMENTS

I concur with the recommendation.

Page 233–235

PURPOSE OF REPORT

The purpose of this report is to introduce the Form and Character Development Permit for 1499 Admirals Rd (Admirals Walk). The property is zoned CD-1: Comprehensive Development and is within the Commercial Development Permit Area.

The application has two main parts:

  • A cosmetic upgrade to the façades and roofs on the buildings.
  • A new plan for signs and sign areas identified.

The Form & Character Development Permit will identify the sign areas on the buildings. A separate Development Variance Permit or permits will be required to address all variances to the proposed signs in advance of the issuance of sign permits.

Page 233–235

BACKGROUND

Admirals Walk is a well-visited, highly visible commercial area in View Royal on Admirals Rd. The applicant desires a fresh look for the mall as well as revisiting the signage needs.

Page 233–235

PROJECT INFORMATION

The application is intended to enable a refresh of the building design by providing façade and roof improvements which introduce a more natural colour palette of charcoal roof, wood and stone treatments and darker wall colourings.

The application is also proposing sign updates.

The applicant has submitted the following information in support of their application:

  1. Applicant’s statement – Applicant – May 9, 2016
  2. Complete set of drawings – Doran Musgrove Architecture – April 5, 2016
  3. Renderings of façade and roof updates – Applicant – Undated
  4. Sign Plan – Applicant – Undated
Page 233–235

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS

Cosmetic Updates

The updates described in the renderings speak directly to the Design Character Guidelines within the Commercial Form and Character Development Permit Area in the Town’s Official Community Plan.

ii) Materials should be durable, high quality and should reflect the natural surroundings of View Royal and a “West Coast” design character; bringing in elements of wood, stone and a natural colour palette. Natural materials are preferred.

The more natural colour palette and the inclusion of stone and wood provides a much improved character of development which addresses this guideline directly.

Sign Plan

The included sign plan addresses the currently haphazard sign condition on the property, which currently consists of a mix of approved, unapproved and not permitted signs (primarily sandwich board signs). Note that the sign plan elevations do not completely reflect the cosmetic improvements to the building itself. Sign permit applications and variances are required.

Sign Areas

The sign plan shows a more consistent placement of sign areas on the buildings than exists currently. The major difference is the inclusion of second storey signs on Building B. Staff is generally not supportive of an inclusion of second storey signs on such a commercial building, as businesses in such a location generally do not cater to walk-by traffic and the signage simply serves to ‘billboard’ for a business. It can add to visual clutter on the building and significantly impact the character of the building.

Rather than providing second-storey signs on the façade and by sandwich board signs along Admirals Rd, staff would prefer that exposure for businesses in Admirals Walk was obtained through free-standing and façade signs at strategic points on the property. While one free-standing sign is permitted in this Sign Zone, a variance could be considered for additional free-standing signage.

Additional Information/Application Required

This Development Permit addresses Form & Character issues on the building rather than specific sign variances. The Development Permit can identify sign areas on the building, but a separate Development Variance Permit will be required to address variances to sign regulations (number of signs, area of signs, size of characters, and so forth). Staff will work with the applicant in that regard, and endeavour to identify free-standing signs and other sign areas in more complete detail before the application comes to Council.

Page 233–235

CONCLUSION AND NEXT STEPS

The proposed treatments to the façade and roof are appropriate for the site and will be a high-quality addition to a visible commercial area in View Royal.

The proposed signage overall offers a welcome improvement to the site. Staff is concerned that second-storey signage is not effective for walk-by traffic and will provide clutter for the building without the corresponding direct impact on increasing walk-by business. Staff will work with the applicant to both paint a more detailed picture in advance of the application coming to Council, and also work towards a logical sign plan and all identified variances within a Development Variance Permit. Many of the signs can come forward with a Sign Permit Application without a DVP if they don’t require variances, but some will require that additional step.

The application is expected to come forward to Council either later in June or in July, 2016.

Page 233–235

RECOMMENDATION

THAT Committee receive this report for information.

SUBMITTED BY:

J. Davison, MCIP RPP, Planner

REVIEWED BY:

L. Chase, MCIP RPP, Director of Development Services

ATTACHMENTS:

  1. Subject Property Map
  2. Subject Property Orthophoto
  3. Applicant’s statement – Applicant – May 9, 2016
  4. Complete set of drawings – Doran Musgrove Architecture – April 5, 2016
  5. Renderings of façade and roof updates – Applicant – Undated
  6. Sign Plan – Applicant - Undated
Page 233–235

Document Images

(11)
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Document image
Extracted from: 2016 06 14 Committee of the Whole Agenda