This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Council Meeting/Documents/Staff Report: REZONING 2026-01 - 241 GLENAIRLIE DRIVE
Staff Report

Staff Report: REZONING 2026-01 - 241 GLENAIRLIE DRIVE

July 7, 2026Pages 410–4205 sectionsOriginal PDF

A report evaluating an application to rezone a portion of a property to facilitate a two-lot subdivision and construction of a new home with a suite.

241 Glenairlie DriveRezone from R-1B to R-1C Detached Residential (Small Lot)$16,000 security deposit for community amenity contributionsTarget building to BC Energy Step Code 5

TOWN OF VIEW ROYAL COUNCIL REPORT

TO: Council DATE: June 24, 2026 FROM: Jeff Chow, Senior Planner MEETING DATE: July 7, 2026

Page 410–420

REZONING 2026-01 - 241 GLENAIRLIE DRIVE

RECOMMENDATION:

THAT the necessary bylaw to amend Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014 to authorize the proposed development outlined in the staff report dated June 24, 2026, and titled “Rezoning 2026-01 - 241 Glenairlie Drive” be prepared for first, second and third reading;

AND THAT Council accept a security deposit for community amenity contributions in the amount of $16,000 in accordance with the Community Amenity Contributions Policy No. 6400-041 prior to final adoption of the zoning bylaw amendment;

AND FURTHER THAT the Town transfer the security deposit funds into the Community Amenity Reserve Fund at the time of building permit in accordance with the Community Amenity Contributions Policy No. 6400-041 based on the type and number of units and refund the balance.

ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION:

That Council decline the Rezoning Application 2026-01 for 241 Glenairlie Drive.

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to introduce a rezoning application to rezone a portion of the property located at 241 Glenairlie Drive from R-1B Detached Residential (Medium Lot) zone to R-1C Detached Residential (Small Lot) to facilitate a two-lot subdivision.

Page 410–420

BACKGROUND:

Description of Proposal

The proposal is to rezone an approximately 420m² portion of the 1064m² parcel to the R-1C zone to facilitate subdivision and create one new lot, Proposed Lot B, as shown in Figure 1 below (see also Attachment 2). The existing dwelling on the subject property would be located on Proposed Lot A, which would have a lot area of approximately 644m² and retain the current R-1B zone. There is a concurrent subdivision application.

Tenants in the existing dwelling would not be displaced by the proposed rezoning and subdivision of the lot.

Figure 1. Proposed Plan of Subdivision
Figure 1. Proposed Plan of Subdivision

Although a rezoning application only considers use and density, the applicant has provided a development concept of a detached dwelling with a secondary suite for Proposed Lot B (see Attachment 3). As shown in Figure 2 below, the proposed building would have a neo-traditional design with peaked roofs and a mix of shingle and board and batten cladding that would complement the existing dwelling and would fit in with the established residential neighbourhood.

Figure 2. Suzanne Place streetscape
Figure 2. Suzanne Place streetscape

Land Use Context

The subject property is located within the Helmcken Neighbourhood as shown in Figure 3 below. Land use in the immediate area is primarily detached residential.

Figure 3. Neighbourhood context
Figure 3. Neighbourhood context

The following features are nearby:

Feature Approximate distance
View Royal Elementary School 250m
Shoreline Middle School 1.2km
14 Vic General / UVic transit stop 275m
E&N Rail Regional Trail (Humpback Connector) access and Glenairlie Park 330m
Portage Park 420m

Existing Site Development and Development Potential

In 2022, a new dwelling was constructed at the north end of the property as shown in Figure 4 below. The new dwelling was one of the first buildings in the town designed and built to the BC Building Code Energy Step Code Level 5, the highest level, exceeding the Town’s voluntary higher standard of BC Building Code Energy Step Code 3.

Under the current R1-B zone, the property could be developed as a detached residential dwelling with a secondary suite and/or a garden suite, or small scale multi-unit housing of up to four units.

Figure 4. Aerial photo
Figure 4. Aerial photo

Community Consultation

The applicant indicates that they canvassed nearby properties. Correspondence received by the Town on the rezoning application to date is attached to the July 7, 2026, Consent Agenda.

Notification signs were posted on each road frontage of the subject property in accordance with Development Procedures Bylaw No. 730, 2009. While s.464 Local Government Act (LGA) prohibits local governments to hold a public hearing on a proposed zoning bylaw that is consistent with the Official Community Plan (OCP) and the sole purpose of the bylaw is to permit a development that is, in whole or in part, a residential development, notice of first reading of the rezoning bylaw is still required in accordance with s.467 of the LGA.

Page 410–420

ANALYSIS:

Official Community Plan (OCP)

The OOCP land use designation of subject property is Small-Scale, Multi-Unit Residential (SSMUH) as shown in Figure 6 below, which supports the following uses, heights and densities:

  • uses including detached residential, duplexes, secondary suite, garden suite, rowhouse, townhouse, houseplex, and apartments
  • building height up to 3 storeys
  • density of up to a maximum of 6 dwelling units.
Figure 6. Official Community Plan Land Use Designation Map excerpt
Figure 6. Official Community Plan Land Use Designation Map excerpt

The proposal is consistent with the SSMUH land use designation. Applicable OCP policies are found in Attachment 4. The proposal is consistent with the policies and can be supported because it further advances OCP policies for housing, in particular the following:

  • The proposed development would be in keeping with the character of the surrounding residential area. (Policy LU2.1 Residential Character)
  • The proposal facilitates family-oriented infill housing in an area close to parks, schools and other community amenities. (Policy HS2.2 Infill Housing)
  • The proposal facilitates a small lot subdivision that would allow either a detached house with secondary suite with a garden suite, or a SSMU development of up to four units. Both types of development would have ground oriented entries and provide a range of housing types to meet the needs of current and future residents. (Policy HS1.1 Range of Housing Types)

Proposed Rezoning

The regulations for the current R-1B Zone and the proposed R-1C Zone for Proposed Lot B can be found in Attachment 5. Proposed Lot A would retain the current R-1B zoning and is where the existing dwelling is located. The zoning review in Attachment 6 confirms that the dwelling and lot would conform with zoning requirements after subdivision.

Table 1 below summarizes how the development concept for Proposed Lot B would comply with R-1C Detached Residential (Small Lot) zoning requirements after subdivision. Of note, Proposed Lot B would have a lot width over 17m, which exceeds the minimum lot width of 15m in the R-1B that applies to every other residential lot on Glenairlie Drive and Suzanne Place. The proposed new lot would not appear out of place in the neighbourhood.

Table 1. Detached Residential Zoning Regulations for Proposed Lot B

R-1C Zone Required Proposed Development Concept
Principal Buildings 1 1
Maximum Secondary Suites 1 1
Minimum Lot Area 360m² 419.9m²
Minimum Lot Width 12m 17.23m
Maximum Floor Area 278m² 194.81m²
Maximum Floor Space Ratio 0.6:1 0.46:1
Maximum Building Height 7.5m 7.53m
Minimum Front Lot Line Setback 7.5m 6.03m
Minimum Rear Lot Line Setback 6.0m 1.6m
Minimum Side Lot Line Setback 1.5m 1.6m
Minimum Flanking Lot Line Setback 4.5m n/a

Table 2 below summarizes the applicable SSMUH regulations applicable to Proposed Lot B should a SSMUH development be constructed on the proposed lot. The SSMUH regulations allow similar development of up to four dwelling units and up to three storeys on every other lot on Glenairlie Drive and Suzanne Place without rezoning.

Table 2. Small-Scale Multi-Unit Housing Regulations for Proposed Lot B

SSMUH Site Standards B-2 Required
Permitted Uses a) Residential, Apartment
b) Residential, Attached
c) Residential, Duplex with secondary suites
d) Residential, Houseplex
Lot Area >= 280 m² and < 600 m²
Number of Dwelling Units (maximum) 4
Minimum Dwelling Unit Floor Area (minimum) 33m²
Building Floor Area (maximum) 372m²
Lot Coverage (maximum) 50%
Impermeable Surface Coverage (maximum) 60%
Building Height (maximum) 11m
Building Width (minimum) 6m
Front Lot Line (minimum) 4m
Rear Lot Line (minimum) 7.5m
Side Lot Line (minimum) 1.5m
Flanking Lot Line (minimum) 3m
Building Separation Distance (minimum) 4m

Transportation

Neighbourhood traffic impacts are expected to be minimal. The subject property is well located to support multi-modal transportation options, including the following:

  • The 14 Vic General / UVic BC Transit stop on Island Highway is 275m away, accessed buy a foot path at the end of Suzanne Place. This is a Frequent Transit Network route with 15 to 20 minutes during most of the day.
  • There is an access to the E&N Rail Regional Trail (Humpback Connector) 330m from the subject property.

Site Servicing

The preliminary site servicing letter (see Attachment 7) indicates there is adequate water and sanitary sewer capacity in the municipal network for the proposed development. Off-site servicing is being reviewed as part of the concurrent subdivision application, which will form part of a Works and Servicing Agreement in accordance with the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw No. 985, 2017. The agreement will also include on-site storm water management requirements to mitigate increased runoff between pre- and post- development and to ensure compliance with the Storm Water Regulation Bylaw No. 902, 2015.

Tree Protection

The subject property currently contains one Garry oak, two Bigleaf maples and one Cherry tree clustered along the side property line that would be impacted by proposed development on Proposed Lot B. The arborist report (see Attachment 8) recommends removal of all the trees for the following reasons:

Tree Bylaw Protected (Yes/No) Rationale for removal
30/23/17cm DBH Multi-stemmed Garry oak Yes Healthy but within building footprint
48cm DBH Bigleaf Maple Yes Potentially compromised roots; infested with ivy; roots comingled with 78cm DBH Big Leaf Maple
78cm DBH Bigleaf Maple Yes Hazardous; major dead branches; heavy lean; fall risk
12cm DBH Cherry No On property line, not suitable for location

Replacement trees will be required in accordance with Tree Protection Bylaw No. 1069, 2022. The applicant is encouraged to plant trees on-site. A tree permit will be required as a condition of subdivision or building permit, whichever comes first.

Community Amenity Contributions

The Community Amenity Contribution Policy sets a community amenity contribution (CAC) target of $6000 per detached residential dwelling or lot, and $4000 per unit for SSMUH development. The policy also allocates 10% of the amount of cash amenities received to be transferred to the Capital Regional District Housing Trust Fund to supplement the Town’s annual contribution. The provision of community amenities to be provided at the time of building permit, is typically secured in a covenant registered on the title as a condition of rezoning. The cost to prepare, register and administer a covenant is impractical for this amount. As an alternative and the applicant is agreeable to providing a deposit of $16,000 for Proposed Lot B prior to fourth reading of the zoning bylaw amendment.

The CACs would be transferred to the Community Amenity Reserve Fund in accordance with the Community Amenity Contribution Policy based on the type of development and number of units on Proposed Lot B as follows:

Type of development Transfer to Community Amenity Reserve Fund Refund
Detached dwelling (with secondary suite and/or garden suite)* $6,000 $10,000
Two- or three-unit SSMUH project $4,000 per unit Remainder $4,000-$8,000
Four-unit SSMUH project 4 x $4,000 = $16,000 Zero

* similar to the development concept in Attachment 3

Sustainability/Climate Change Impacts:

The Sustainability Checklist can be found in Attachment 9.

The proposal would result in the removal of four trees on Proposed Lot B. However, there is an opportunity to restore the tree canopy over the long term through tree replacement, preferably on-site.

Page 410–420

Building Bylaw No. 1111, 2023 requires new Part 9 buildings to achieve the minimum performance requirements and objectives specified in Step 3 of the Energy Step Code. The applicant indicates in the Sustainability Checklist that they intend to exceed this by building to BC Energy Step Code 5, which they have previously demonstrated in the construction of the existing dwelling on Proposed Lot A.

The Building Bylaw also sets voluntary standards for greenhouse gas emissions that are higher than the base BC Building Code. Buildings must be designed and constructed in conformance with Zero Carbon Step Code - Level 4 at time of building permit application, which is the highest level where there would be zero carbon emissions.

Other impacts and implications can be summarized as follows:

Impact/Implication Description
Community Impact: There are no anticipated impacts to the community.
Financial Implication: There are no financial implications for the Town.
Inter-governmental Relations Impact: n/a

ALIGNMENT:

The recommended option aligns with the Town’s following core guiding documents as follows:

Strategic Plan:

  • Strategic Priority A - Enhance Liveability:
    • Goal 1 - Shift primary transport mode within View Royal away from vehicles to walking, cycling, and transit
    • Goal 3 - Access to broad range of housing options to meet the needs of various ages, family types and incomes
    • Goal 4 - Ensure proximity to services

Official Community Plan: Refer to Analysis section of this report

Other Policy Documents: n/a

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION GOAL:

The desired level of public participation for the recommended option is:

☐ Inform ☒ Consult ☐ Involve ☐ Collaborate ☐ Empower ☐ N/A

TIME CRITICAL:

This report is not time critical.

CONCURRENCE:

Role Initials Comments
Chief Administrative Officer SS I concur with the recommendation.

REVIEWED BY:

Role Initials
Director of Corporate Administration/Deputy CAO N/A
Director of Finance & Technology N/A
Director of Development Services LT
Director of Engineering IL
Director of Protective Services N/A

ATTACHMENTS:

  1. Letter to Mayor and Council and Application Rationale, received April 18, 2026
  2. Plan of Proposed Subdivision – Powell and Associates, received April 18, 2026
  3. Development Concept – Outline Home Design, received April 18, 2026
  4. Official Community Plan policy review
  5. Zoning Bylaw excerpts: R-1B and R-1C zones
  6. R-1B Zone review for Proposed Lot A
  7. Site Servicing Letter – Calid Services Ltd, received April 18, 2026
  8. Arborist Report – New Growth Tree Service, received April 18, 2026
  9. Sustainability Checklist
Page 410–420

Document Images

(1)
Document image
Extracted from: 2026 07 07 Council Meeting - Agenda - Pdf(507 pages total)