DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (FORM & CHARACTER) 2022-02 – 167, 169, & 171 ISLAND HIGHWAY
Report from the Community Planner recommending approval of a development permit for a five-storey, 82-unit apartment building with several variances.
TOWN OF VIEW ROYAL COUNCIL REPORT
TO: Council DATE: August 29, 2022 FROM: Stirling Scory, RPP, MCIP, Community Planner MEETING DATE: September 6, 2022
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (FORM & CHARACTER) 2022-02 – 167, 169, & 171 ISLAND HIGHWAY
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT Development Permit Application No. 2022-02 be approved as per the August 29, 2022, report from the Community Planner titled “Development Permit (Mixed Residential) 2022-02 – 167, 169, & 171 Island Highway”;
AND THAT Development Permit Application No. 2022-02 include the following conditions:
- Tree Permit a. A Tree Permit be submitted prior to Building Permit that follows the Arborist Report provided by Talmack Urban Forestry, titled: “167, 169, & 171 Island Hwy, View Royal, BC: Construction Impact Assessment & Tree Management Plan; and
- A security deposit of $338,112.00, at 120% of the quoted landscape works ($281,760.00) to be provided
- That the owner, enter into an agreement with the Town of View Royal via a Licence to Occupy that allows access from the subject property from the rear property line to the edge of the existing path. The agreement shall stipulate that access is to be maintained by the Strata and the operation and use of such a path will indemnify the Town of any responsibility or liability.
- That as part of the Building Permit application process, the following be provided prior to or at the time of Building Permit application: a. Stormwater Management Plan b. Servicing Plans c. Structural Engineered design, stamp, and approval of suspended parkade structure to hold the Town of View Royal’s fire truck fleet. d. Confirmation from a geotechnical engineer that the foundation work will not affect neighbouring properties, due to the proximity of the foundation walls to property line.
AND FURTHER THAT Development Permit Application No. 2022-02 include the following variances:
- Variance to Section 4.8.9 of Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014 to vary the maximum permitted height of retaining walls from 1.2 m to 3.0 m.
- Variance to Section 3.7.2 (b) of Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014 to vary the maximum a balcony/open porch may project into the side yard setback from 0.5 m to 1.1 m.
- Variance to Section 3.7.2 (b) of Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014 to vary the maximum width of a balcony may be on a building face from 2.0 m to 9.2 m.
- Variance to Section 4.6.2 (c) of Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014 to permit the location of an accessory building or other structure in the front yard.
- Variance to Section 5.10 (Table 5.2) of Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014 to vary the minimum number of required parking spaces from 93 to 92.
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER’S COMMENTS:
I concur with the recommendation.
DIRECTOR OF CORPORATE ADMINISTRATIONS’ COMMENTS:
I concur with the recommendation.
DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING’S COMMENTS:
I concur with the recommendation.
PURPOSE OF REPORT:
To consider a Development Permit (Form and Character – Mixed Residential) that would facilitate the following:
- One 5-storey, 82-unit residential apartment building
- Removal of on- and off-site trees, and three existing single detached dwellings
- Pathway connection from the rear of the subject property into Portage Park
BACKGROUND:
The 3780 m² site is comprised of three lots, 167, 169, and 171 Island Highway. The site is bound by Portage Park to the east, View Royal Town Hall and a trail leading into the Park from the west and south, and Four Mile House and Island Highway to the north.
The site was rezoned from R-1B Detached Residential (Medium Lot) to a new site-specific CD 27: Comprehensive Development (Island Highway – Portage) zone in April 2022. The purpose was to permit multi-family residential use, and to set out requirements for the land use, density, lot coverage, percentage of impervious surface, and the height and siting of buildings. This development permit application approval process formalizes the design and landscaping of the site and is being presented for Council’s consideration.
Development Proposal:
The proposed development (Attachment 3) is to construct a single five-storey 82-unit apartment building, which will contain a mix of studio, 1-, 2-, and 3-bedroom suites. The building includes underground parking, and an underground bicycle parking storage area complete with storage lockers. Visitor parking is provided above ground at the front of the building.
In support of the application, the following attachments are provided to this report:
- Letter to Council
- Architectural Drawings & Site Plan
- Electrical Site Plan (Lighting)
- Civil Servicing Plan
- Landscaping plan
- Landscape Cost Estimate
- Arborist Report
- Left Turn Memo
- Sustainability Checklist
Summary of Changes:
Since seeing the proposal at Committee of the Whole on June 14, 2022, the applicant has worked with staff to address outstanding items. The changes include:
- Park connection: a single connection to Portage Park is located at the rear of the property, connecting the trail system in the park with the on-site pathway (used for pedestrian, and bicycles)
- Landscaping: fencing added to permitter of the site, revisions to landscape plan, and confirmation of trees required for the site and off-site
- Revised bicycle access: confirmed bicycle ramps would be installed on stairwells and revised pathway connection through the pavilion to create a direct access to Island Highway
- Building Design: the soffits shown to be made of cedar in the renderings will be made out of metal and will have a wood appearance (physical sample provided)
- Applicant clarified requested variances (see below for details)
- Applicant clarified parking details (see below for details)
Building Design
The building will be constructed using a sandy coloured brick ‘Milwaukee’, for the front building façade. Greater design details may be reviewed in the architectural drawings (See Attachment 3). The remainder of the buildings’ wall faces would use board and batten coloured in white with cement panels in grey. The building will have metal soffits with a wood grain appearance. A sample of the buildings’ rendering, and materials list is provided below in Figure 1 and Figure 2. Additionally, the applicant has provided physical samples of the proposed building materials.


Table 1 - Unit Mix
| Bedroom Type | Number of Units |
|---|---|
| Jr. 1 Bedroom (Studio) | 20 |
| 1 Bedroom | 16 |
| 1 Bedroom + Flex | 27 |
| 2 Bedroom | 12 |
| 2 Bedroom + Flex | 4 |
| 3 Bedroom | 3 |
Landscaping
- A pavilion located on-site with a covered seating area, fireplace, and green roof
- On-site pathway, which provides interior connections between the building and grounds, the pavilion, and access to Portage Park via a rear access
- Portage Park access located at the rear of the property, providing direct access to the park for cyclists and pedestrians
- On-site hard and soft landscape features, including native and ornamental species, perennial flower beds, and raised beds for shrubs and trees
- Black chain link fencing to surround permitter of property
- On-site rain garden to assist in managing stormwater runoff
A full list of landscape features may be seen in the landscape plan and electrical plan (see Attachments 6 and 4 respectively).
Tree Protection
The proposal identifies 44 bylaw protected trees (see Attachment 8) that will be removed to accommodate the development. Of the 44 trees identified, 3 trees are located within Portage Park.
The three identified trees, OS1, OS2, and OS3, can be seen in Figure 3 below, details on the type of tree, size and health are included in Table 2. The details provided by the arborist show that the health of the three trees proposed to be removed in Portage Park are in declining health. The three trees are protected under the Tree Protection Bylaw, No. 1069, 2022, requires that bylaw protected trees be replaced at a 2:1 ratio. The proposed landscape plan shows that there is a deficiency of 20 replacement trees. The applicant will be required to apply for a Tree Permit prior to building permit, at that time details on the location and types of trees will be reviewed to ensure that the locations and types are in general conformance to the landscape plan. The Tree Bylaw states that $500 per tree be provided as cash in lieu if the applicant cannot plant their replacement tree quota. Staff will work with the applicant to replace the trees removed from Portage Park as per the requirements of the Tree Bylaw. The trees required through the Tree Bylaw are in addition to the trees secured through covenant at time of rezoning, as detailed below.

Table 2 - Tree Analysis
| Tag # | Bylaw Protected | Type of Tree | Size of Caliper | Height (m) | Health Rating | Arborist Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS1 | Yes | Grand Fir | 37 | 20 | Fair | Surface roots, sparse foliage lower crown. |
| OS2 | Yes | Douglas-fir | 32 | 20 | Fair | Deadwood lower crown, branch failures (hangers). |
| OS3 | Yes | Bigleaf maple | 50, 25 | 20 | Poor | Extensive decay, undermined, supported by hedge row. |
Covenant
A covenant registered at the time of rezoning requires the following:
- Four (4) 50 mm minimum caliper Douglas fir or Bigleaf maple trees be planted in Portage Park with a security deposit of $2000 for each of these trees;
- $50,000 be paid to the Town for the removal of invasive species in Portage Park; and
- A Community Amenity Contribution of $4000 per unit prior to issuance of a building permit.
Servicing Requirements
A detailed stormwater plan must be provided prior to Building Permit. Other site servicing and frontage improvements will be required, and will be detailed in a servicing agreement, as per the Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw No. 985, 2017. For reference, see conceptual servicing plan (Attachment 5). The applicant had been previously asked to provide a fire truck turning template to confirm site access and maneuverability, this has been confirmed.
Park Access
The applicant had included in their original application two accesses into Portage Park from the subject property. The applicant was advised that only a singular access was to be permitted and would be located at the rear of the property. Agreement to the park access was based on improved and functional access for pedestrians and cyclists, which required that the applicant ensure bicycle ramps were installed in the underground parking and rear exterior stairwell access, that lighting be provided, and that security features be added. The applicant has satisfied these requirements.
In addition to these design measures, the Town specified that an agreement would be required as a condition for the provision of the pathway. The proposed pathway into Portage Park from the subject property shall be secured through a License to Occupy between the Town and the Strata. The agreement will require that the strata take sole responsibility for the maintenance and operation of the pathway and indemnify the Town of all liability of its use. The License to Occupy will be a condition of receiving a building permit.
DISCUSSION:
Key considerations in review of the proposal include:
- How does the proposal address the relevant development permit guidelines?
- How does the proposal comply with the zoning requirements and are the requested variances supportable?
1. Development Permit Area Guidelines
The site is within the Mixed Residential – Form and Character Development Permit Area. In general, the proposal aligns with the development permit area guidelines, as it achieves the following:
e. Design Character
- Unified architectural concept makes use of natural colours, and blends the surrounding natural and built environment effectively
- Provides an interesting building façade, complete with a mix of building materials, colors, and accentuated balconies
- Parking is located underground and the entrance is offset to preserve the focal point of the building’s front entrance
f. Public and Pedestrian Realm
- Pedestrian pathways on-site provide direct access from the road, and a single connection into Portage Park
- Building orientation and design marks a clear front entrance
g. Siting, Height, and Massing
- Buildings’ scale and height are reduced with rounding of front building façade and balconies
- The 5th storey is stepped back to reduce the appearance of a single wall face
h. Landscaping
- Outdoor pavilion provides communal space for residents
- Mix of hard and soft landscaping provides diverse green space that can blend with Portage Park
i. Park, Access, and Circulation
- All parking stalls (bicycle & vehicular) are energized
- Bicycle parking is located on-site via an underground bike room, and features both standard, wall mounted, and cargo bicycle stalls
- Elevator access improves ‘age in place’ opportunities
- Additional space has been allocated for shared e-bikes
- Nine visitor parking spaces are located at surface level at the front entrance of the building
2. Zoning Bylaw Review
The proposal complies with the use and density requirements of the CD – 27 Island Highway – Portage Zone, as was established through the rezoning process for the subject properties. Table 2 below shows overall compliance, and notable zoning details including requested variances:
Summary of Zoning and Variances
| Required | Proposed | |
|---|---|---|
| Lot Size | 1500 m² | 3780 m² |
| Floor Space Ratio w/ provision of 80% parking underground | 1.6:1 | 1.6:1 |
| Lot Coverage, max | 60% | 60% |
| Impermeable surface coverage max | 80% | 45% |
| Building Height Max | 18 m | 17.8 m |
| Top Storey | Shall not exceed an area equivalent to 75 percent of the floor area of the storey below | 68% |
| Accessory Building Height, maximum | 4.5 m | 3.0 m |
| Front Lot Line Setback | 18.0 m | 18.9 m |
| Rear Lot Line Setback | 7.0 m | 8.6 m |
| Side Lot Line Setback (to 199 Island Highway) | 4.0 m | 4.0 m |
| Side Lot Line Setback (Portage Park) | 8.0 m | 8.4 m |
| OTHER | Required | Proposed |
| Chimneys, bay windows, heating or ventilation equipment, balconies, open porches or ornamental features may project up to 0.5m into any setback and must be limited to a maximum width of 2m per building face within a side yard setback or rear yard setback. | Balcony projection into the side yard from .5 m to 1.1 m. * | |
| Maximum width of a balcony on single wall from 2.0 m to 9.2 m. * | ||
| Siting of an accessory building or structure in the front yard. | Locate an accessory structure in the front yard. * | |
| Retaining Wall Heights | Increase maximum from 1.2 m to 3.0 m. * | |
| Fence height and material | Black vinyl coated chain link fence, 1.2 m. |
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
| Required | Proposed | |
|---|---|---|
| Parking Spaces | 93 | 92 * |
| Small Car Parking | n/a | Maximum 30%, increase to 39% (30 spaces to 36 spaces) |
| Accessible Vehicle Parking | 1 | 1 |
| Energized Vehicle Parking | All vehicle spaces must be energized. | All vehicle spaces energized. |
| Bicycle Parking | Class 1 Bicycle Parking, 1.0 per unit (82) + 1 six space rack at entrance. | 82 stalls provided underground + 1 six space rack at front entrance of building |
| Energized Bicycle Parking | Every Class 1 bicycle parking space must be energized. | All spaces are energized. |
| Visitor Parking | n/a | 9 spaces provided |
| Loading Space | n/a | 1 space provided |
* Variance required.
The applicant has requested five variances, which are as follows:
- Variance to Section 4.8.9 of Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014 to vary the maximum permitted height of retaining walls from 1.2m to 3.0m.
- Variance to Section 3.7.2 (b) of Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014 to vary the maximum a balcony/open porch may project into the side yard setback from 0.5m to 1.1m.
- Variance to Section 3.7.2 (b) of Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014 to vary the maximum width of a balcony may be on a building face from 2.0m to 9.2m.
- Variance to Section 4.6.2 (c) of Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014 to vary the location of a accessory building or other structure to be permitted to be located in the front yard.
- Variance to Section 5.10 (Table 5.2) of Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014 to vary the minimum number of required parking spaces from 93 to 92.
Staff is aware that it had been previously communicated that a sixth variance was required, with respect to the total “Small Car Only” parking. In further review of the application it was determined that a variance was not required, because the visitor parking (marked for small car parking spaces) was included in the calculation, pushing the total permitted number of “Small Car Only” parking spaces over the permitted limit. Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014 does not specify any regulations or provisions for visitor parking, and so they are exempt from maximum number of permitted “Small Car Only” spaces.
Variance 1: Retaining Walls
The variance to the maximum permitted retaining wall height from 1.2m to 3.0m as shown in Figure 3 can be supported because the walls do not directly interface with a neighbouring property line and are used to provide access to underground parking.

Variances 2 & 3
The applicant requests a variance to the maximum projection of a balcony into the side yard setback from 0.5m to 1.1m, and to vary the maximum width of a balcony on a building face from 2.0m to 9.2m. The requested variance in question may be seen below.

The variances can be supported because the building has a large 8.4m setback from Portage Park, which reduces the scale and intensity of the building from the park. Staff considers that the variance for these four balconies (Floors 2 to 5) will not adversely impact the enjoyment of Portage Park as they do not overlook the playground.
Variance 4
A variance to locate an accessory structure in the front yard is requested. The pavilion provides covered, outdoor communal space for the residents of the proposed development. The bylaw states that secondary or accessory structure are not permitted in the front yard. Figure 5 below shows in detail where the proposed structure is on site.

The requested variance is supportable because the structure is set back a large distance from the road and exceeds the minimum 1.2m required setback for all property lines as it would be located over 14m from the front lot line and 4.3m from Portage Park. Additionally, the provision of such features makes functional sense to be in a space that is easily accessible by residents. The proposed location is near the building’s front entrance where the elevator is and close to visitor parking, making it a central, accessible social space.
Variance 5
The applicant has requested that the total required parking for the site be reduced by one space, from 93 to 92. Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014 requires that the following parking provisions be met for a multiple family dwelling in Table 2.
Table 3 - Parking Requirements
| Requirement | Total Spaces | |
|---|---|---|
| Apartment | Studio or One Bedroom – 1 per dwelling unit | 63 Total Spaces |
| Two Bedroom – 1.5 per dwelling unit | 24 Total Spaces | |
| Three Bedroom – 2 per dwelling unit | 6 Total Spaces |
The variance can be supported because:
- Transportation Demand Management measures have been provided to improve bicycle facilities given the convenient proximity to the E&N Rail Trail
- The site located within reasonable walking distance to local services at the Eastern Gateway Community Corridor (Admirals Walk, Nelson Square and Canadian Tire shopping centres)
- The site has good access via the Shoreline School pedestrian overpass to Frequent Transit Network bus stops on either side of Island Highway.
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT Development Permit Application No. 2022-02 be approved as per the August 29, 2022, report from the Community Planner titled “Development Permit (Mixed Residential) 2022-02 – 167, 169, & 171 Island Highway”;
AND THAT Development Permit Application No. 2022-02 include the following conditions:
- Tree Permit a. A Tree Permit be submitted prior to Building Permit that follows the Arborist Report provided by Talmack Urban Forestry, titled: “167, 169, & 171 Island Hwy, View Royal, BC: Construction Impact Assessment & Tree Management Plan; and
- A security deposit of $338,112.00, at 120% of the quoted landscape works ($281,760.00) to be provided
- That the owner, enter into an agreement with the Town of View Royal via a Licence to Occupy that allows access from the subject property from the rear property line to the edge of the existing path. The agreement shall stipulate that access is to be maintained by the Strata and the operation and use of such a path will indemnify the Town of any responsibility or liability.
- That as part of the Building Permit application process, the following be provided prior to or at the time of Building Permit application: a. Stormwater Management Plan b. Servicing Plans c. Structural Engineered design, stamp, and approval of suspended parkade structure to hold the Town of View Royal’s fire truck fleet. d. Confirmation from a geotechnical engineer that the foundation work will not affect neighbouring properties, due to the proximity of the foundation walls to property line.
AND FURTHER THAT Development Permit Application No. 2022-02 include the following variances:
- Variance to Section 4.8.9 of Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014 to vary the maximum permitted height of retaining walls from 1.2 m to 3.0 m.
- Variance to Section 3.7.2 (b) of Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014 to vary the maximum a balcony/open porch may project into the side yard setback from 0.5 m to 1.1 m.
- Variance to Section 3.7.2 (b) of Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014 to vary the maximum width of a balcony may be on a building face from 2.0 m to 9.2 m.
- Variance to Section 4.6.2 (c) of Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014 to permit the location of an accessory building or other structure in the front yard.
- Variance to Section 5.10 (Table 5.2) of Zoning Bylaw No. 900, 2014 to vary the minimum number of required parking spaces from 93 to 92.
SUBMITTED BY: Stirling Scory, RPP, MCIP, Community Planner
REVIEWED BY: Sarah Jones, RPP, MCIP, Director of Corporate Services
Attachments:
- Subject Property Map
- Letter to Council
- Architectural Drawings & Site Plan
- Electrical Site Plan (Lighting)
- Civil Servicing Plan
- Landscaping plan
- Landscape Cost Estimate
- Arborist Report
- Left Turn Memo
- Sustainability Checklist
- Form and Character Development Permit Review



