This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Council Meeting/Documents/Town of View Royal 2024 Audit Service Plan
Presentation

Town of View Royal 2024 Audit Service Plan

November 19, 2024Pages 10–2713 sections

Audit service plan for the year ending December 31, 2024, prepared by MNP LLP.

5.a) C. Vanderhorst, Regional Assurance Partner, MNP LLP, Re: Presentation of the 2024 Audit Service Plan
2024 Audit fee estimate: $24,675Overall materiality: $1,100,000Audit team led by Cory Vanderhorst, CPA, CA

Town of View Royal

Page 10–27

2024 Audit Service Plan

Report to Mayor and Council December 31, 2024

Blurred office background
Blurred office background

Cory Vanderhorst, CPA, CA T: 250.734.4319 E: cory.vanderhorst@mnp.ca

October 4, 2024

To the Mayor and Council of the Town of View Royal

Dear Sirs and Mesdames:

We are pleased to present our Audit Service Plan for the Town of View Royal (the “Town”). In this plan we describe MNP’s audit approach, our engagement team, the scope of our audit and a timeline of anticipated deliverables. We are providing this Audit Service Plan to Mayor and Council on a confidential basis. It is intended solely for the use of Mayor and Council and is not intended for any other purpose. Accordingly, we disclaim any responsibility to any other party who may rely on this report.

Our audit will include an audit of the Town’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2024, prepared in accordance with Canadian public sector accounting standards. Our audit will be conducted in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards.

At MNP, our objective is to perform an efficient, high quality audit which focuses on those areas that are considered higher risk. We adhere to the highest level of integrity and professionalism. We are dedicated to maintaining open channels of communication throughout this engagement and will work with management to coordinate the effective performance of the engagement. Our goal is to exceed Mayor and Council’s expectations and ensure you receive outstanding service.

Additional material provided along with this report includes our Engagement Letter. Our Engagement Letter is the formal written agreement of the terms of our audit engagement as negotiated with management and outlines our responsibilities under Canadian generally accepted auditing standards.

We look forward to discussing our Audit Service Plan with you and look forward to responding to any questions you may have.

Sincerely,

MNP LLP Chartered Professional Accountants

Page 10–27

Table of Contents

Section Page
MNP’s Client Service Commitment 1
Topics for Discussion 1
Key Changes and Developments 2
Risk Assessment 3
Risk Assessment 3
Key Milestones 5
Audit Materiality 5
Audit Team 6
Fees and Assumptions 7
Appendix A – Key Changes and Developments 8
Appendix B – The Audit Process 10
Page 10–27

MNP’s Client Service Commitment

To make strategic business decisions with confidence, your stakeholders and Mayor and Council of the Town need relevant, reliable and independently audited financial information. But that’s not all. You need an audit team that can deliver insight beyond the numbers and enhance the Town’s strategic planning and implementation processes so you can embrace new opportunities while effectively managing risk. Our senior team members have extensive knowledge of your municipalities from many years of experience. Our audit strategy is risk based, and considers the limitations and opportunities you encounter each day, allowing our recommendations to be implemented with greater ease. Committed to your success, MNP delivers meaningful, reliable financial information to not only help you fulfill your compliance obligations, but also to achieve your key strategic goals.

Our Audit Service Plan outlines the strategy we will follow to provide the Town’s Mayor and Council with our Independent Auditor’s Report on the December 31, 2024 consolidated financial statements.

Topics for Discussion

We are committed to providing superior client service by maintaining effective two-way communication. Topics for discussion include, but are not limited to:

  • Changes to your business operations and developments in the financial reporting and regulatory environment
  • Fraud, including how fraud could occur, the risk of fraud and misstatement, and any actual, suspected or alleged fraud
  • Business plans and strategies
  • The management oversight process
  • Any other issues and/or concerns
  • Your specific needs and expectations
  • Documents comprising the annual report, and their timing of issuance
Page 10–27

Key Changes and Developments

Based on our knowledge of the Town and our discussions with management, we have not noted any recent developments.

Key Issues and Developments Summary
Folder and pencil icon
Folder and pencil icon
New Reporting Developments
* PS 3400 Revenue (New)
Three location pins icon
Three location pins icon
New Assurance Developments
* Group Audits (Amendments to CAS 600)

[Communicate the impact of these assurance developments on the audit or the Entity]

Detailed information on Key Changes and Developments are included as Appendix A.

Page 10–27

Risk Assessment

Risk Assessment

Based on the preliminary risk assessment procedures performed, we have identified the following significant and high risks which will be addressed during our audit. We have also outlined the proposed audit response to address those risks. We will update our risk assessment as the audit progresses for additional risks identified and will inform management of any additional significant risks identified.

Significant Risk Area Proposed Audit Response
Management override of internal controls To respond to the overall risk of material misstatement due to fraud regarding management's override of controls, we perform the following procedures:
1. Test the appropriateness of journal entries recorded in the general ledger and other adjustments made in the preparation of the financial statements
2. Review accounting estimates for biases and evaluate whether the circumstances producing the bias, if any, represent a risk of material misstatement due to fraud, if applicable
3. Evaluate the rationale behind significant transactions that are not in the normal course of business and whether they have been entered into to engage in fraudulent financial reporting or to conceal misappropriation of assets
Property tax revenue

Risk of misstatement due to errors in the rate or property value.
To respond to the risk of misstatement in property tax revenue, we perform the following procedures:
1. Obtain a copy of the signed Bylaw Establishing the Property Tax Rates for Municipal, Library, Regional District, Regional Hospital District and Business Improvement Areas Purposes for 2023
2. Obtain a copy of the BC Assessment 2023 Revised Roll
3. Recalculate the property tax revenue and compare to the revenue per the financial statements.
4. Investigate any significant variances
Government transfers

Risk of misstatement due to revenue being deferred that does not meet the criteria for deferral or of revenue being recognized when criteria for recognition have not been met.
To respond to the risk of misstatement in government transfer revenue, we perform the following procedures:
1. Obtain a copy of the funding agreement
2. Determine whether there are specific criteria in the agreement for the use of the funding under PSAS
3. If the specific criteria are not met, confirm revenue has been recognized
4. If the specific criteria are met, confirm revenue has only been recognized where appropriate under PSAS.
Contributed assets

Risk of misstatement due to developer contributions being recorded before legal transfer or developer contributions not being recorded in the correct period, and/or risk that developer contributions have been recorded at the incorrect value.
To respond to the risk of misstatement in contributed assets, we perform the following procedures:
1. Obtain listing of contributed assets (developer contributions) from management
2. Conduct a search of new developments in the area and confirm listing is complete
3. Obtain documentation to support legal transfer has occurred
4. Obtain engineering report and compare values on the engineering report to the contributed asset value and corresponding revenue recorded in the financial statements
Page 10–27

Key Milestones

Based on the audit planning performed and areas of audit risks identified, the following timelines for key deliverables have been discussed and agreed upon with management:

Key Deliverable Expected Date
Delivery of December 31, 2024 Audit Service Plan to Mayor and Council October 2024
Interim procedures December 9, 2024 to December 10, 2024
Year-end fieldwork procedures April 8, 2025 to April 11, 2025
Draft year-end consolidated financial statements to be discussed with management April 2025
Presentation of December 31, 2024 Audit Findings Report to Mayor and Council May 2025
Presentation of Management Letter to Mayor and Council May 2025
Issuance of Independent Auditor’s Report May 2025
Page 10–27

Audit Materiality

Materiality is an important audit concept. It is used to assess the significance of misstatements or omissions that are identified during the audit and is used to determine the level of audit testing that is carried out. Specifically, a misstatement or the aggregate of all misstatements in consolidated financial statements as a whole (and, if applicable, for particular classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures) is considered to be material if it is probable that the decision of the party relying on the consolidated financial statements, who has reasonable understanding of business and economic activities, will be changed or influenced by such a misstatement or the aggregate of all misstatements.

The scope of our audit work is tailored to reflect the relative size of operations of the Town and our assessment of the potential for material misstatements in the Town’s consolidated financial statements as a whole (and, if applicable, for particular classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures). In determining the scope, we emphasize relative audit risk and materiality, and consider a number of factors, including:

  • The size, complexity, and growth of the Town;
  • Changes within the organization, management or accounting systems; and
  • Concerns expressed by management.

Judgment is applied separately to the determination of materiality in the audit of each set of consolidated financial statements (and, if applicable, for particular classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures) and is affected by our perception of the financial information needs of users of the consolidated financial statements. In this context, it is reasonable to assume that users understand that consolidated financial statements are prepared, presented and audited to levels of materiality; recognize uncertainties inherent in the measurement of amounts based on the use of estimates, judgment and consideration of future events; and make reasonable economic decisions based on the consolidated financial statements. The foregoing factors are taken into account in establishing the materiality level.

We propose to use $1,100,000 as overall materiality for audit planning purposes.

Page 10–27

Audit Team

Team member continuity is important in developing a solid relationship with the Town, as well as to understanding your business, risks and processes. We also know team member turnover results in lost knowledge. While some team member transition likely is inevitable, we work at reducing this through our promoting practices, learning and training, working closely with team members on career growth and development, and valuing our professionals.

In order to ensure effective communication between Mayor and Council and MNP, we outline below the key members of our audit team that will be responsible for the audit of the Town and the role they will play:

Team Members Contact Information
Cory Vanderhorst, CPA, CA, Engagement Partner E: Cory.Vanderhorst@mnp.ca
James Kungel, CPA, CA, Tax Partner E: James.Kungel@mnp.ca
Louise Blomer, CPA, Engagement Manager E: Louise.Blomer@mnp.ca
Three stylized people icon
Three stylized people icon

In order to serve you better and meet our professional responsibilities, we may find it necessary to expand our audit team to include other professionals whose consultation will assist us to evaluate and resolve complex, difficult and/or contentious matters identified during the course of our audit.

Any changes to the audit team will be discussed with you to ensure a seamless process and that all concerned parties’ needs are met.

Page 10–27

Fees and Assumptions

DESCRIPTION 2024 ESTIMATE 2023 ACTUAL
Base audit fee $ 24,675 $ 23,500
Total $ 24,675 $ 23,500

If any significant issues arise during the course of our audit work which indicate a possibility of increased procedures or a change in the audit timetable, these will be discussed with management by the engagement partner, so a mutually agreeable solution can be reached.

Invoices will be rendered as work progresses in accordance with the following schedule:

DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
On delivery of the audit service plan $ 12,000
At the start of year-end field work $ 6,300
Upon the delivery of the final consolidated financial statements and Independent Auditor's Report $ 6,375
Total $ 24,675
Page 10–27

Appendix A – Key Changes and Developments

We would like to bring to your attention the following accounting and auditing developments, which may have some impact on your financial reporting.

Issues and Developments Summary

New Reporting Developments

PS 3400 Revenue (New)

In November 2018, new PS 3400 Revenue was included in the CPA Canada Public Sector Accounting Handbook (PSA HB). The new PS 3400 establishes standards on how to account for and report on revenue by distinguishing between revenue arising from transactions that include performance obligations and transactions that do not have performance obligations. The main features of this Section are as follows:

  • Performance obligations are enforceable promises to provide specific goods or services to a specific payor.
  • Performance obligations can be satisfied at a point in time or over a period of time.
  • The new standard outlines five indicators to determine if the revenue would be recognized over a period of time.
  • Revenue from a transaction with a performance obligation(s) is recognized when, or as, the entity has satisfied the performance obligation(s).
  • Revenue from transactions with no performance obligation is recognized when a public sector entity has the authority to claim or retain an inflow of economic resources and a past event that gives rise to a claim of economic resources has occurred.

Further editorial changes have also been made to other standards as a result of the issuance of PS 3400.

This Section was to be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after April 1, 2022. On June 25, 2020, the PSAB made the decision to defer the effective date by one year due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The new Section is now effective for annual financial statements relating to fiscal years beginning on or after April 1, 2023. Early application continues to be permitted.

New Assurance Developments

Group Audits (Amendments to CAS 600)

In August 2022, the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AASB) issued the revised CAS 600 Special Considerations – Audits of Group Financial Statements (Including the Work of Component Auditors) to replace the existing CAS 600 and adopt, with appropriate Canadian amendments, the International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 600 (Revised), Special Considerations – Audits of Group Financial Statements (Including the Work of Component Auditors) and any conforming and consequential amendments.

The revised standard incorporates several key changes to establish more robust requirements and provide detailed guidance for group auditors and component auditors when conducting a group audit, including:

  • Introducing a principles-based approach that can be adapted and is scalable for group audits of varying circumstances and complexities;
  • Establishing a framework for planning and performing a group audit engagement;
  • Emphasizing the importance of professional skepticism;
  • Clarifying and providing solutions to overcome restriction issues related to access to people, information, or audit documentation;
  • Clarifying how the concepts of materiality and aggregation risk apply in a group audit;
  • Specifying the importance of two-way communications between the group auditor and component auditors, including expectations regarding the timing of those communications; and
  • Strengthening various aspects of the group auditor's interaction with component auditors.

As a result of issuing the revised CAS 600, requirements for several other standards have been amended to better articulate the auditor's responsibilities regarding audits of group financial statements:

  • CAS 300 Planning an Audit of Financial Statements
  • CAS 320 Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit
  • CAS 700 Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements

The revised CAS 600 and conforming amendments to other standards are effective for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2023. Earlier application is permitted.

Page 10–27

Appendix B – The Audit Process

Our Plan

Our audit process focuses on significant risks identified during the pre-planning and planning and risk assessment stage, ensuring that audit procedures are tailored to your specific circumstances and appropriately address those risks.

Mayor and Council is responsible for approval of the consolidated financial statements and Town policies, and for monitoring management’s performance. Mayor and Council should consider the potential for management override of controls or other inappropriate influences, such as earnings management, over the financial reporting process. Mayor and Council, together with management, is also responsible for the integrity of the accounting and financial reporting systems, including controls to prevent and detect fraud and misstatement, and to monitor compliance with relevant laws and regulations.

Effective discharge of these respective responsibilities is directed toward a common duty to provide appropriate and adequate financial accountability, and quality financial disclosure.

Key responsibilities of MNP and management are outlined in the Engagement Letter (see attached).

Our overall audit strategy is risk-based and controls-oriented. Assessment and identification of risk is performed continuously throughout the audit process. We focus on the risks that have a potential impact on the financial accounting systems and subsequent financial reporting.

Our overall audit strategy does not, and is not intended to involve the authentication of documents, nor are our team members trained or expected to be experts in such authentication. Unless we have reason to believe otherwise, we accept records and documents as genuine. The subsequent discovery of a material misstatement resulting from fraud does not, in and of itself, indicate a failure to comply with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards.

Audit Procedures

To meet our responsibilities in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards, our audit examination includes:

  • Obtaining an understanding of the entity and its environment, the applicable financial reporting framework and the entity’s system of internal controls, in order to identify and assess the risk that the consolidated financial statements contain material misstatements due to fraud or misstatement;
  • Assessing the design and implementation of and examining, on a test basis, the key controls over significant transaction streams and over the general organizational and computer environments;
  • Assessing the systems used to ensure compliance with applicable legislative and related authorities pertaining to financial reporting, revenue raising, borrowing, and investing activities;
  • Examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements;
  • Assessing the appropriateness and consistency of accounting principles used and their application;
  • Assessing the significant estimates used by management; and,
  • Assessing the entity’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

As part of our planning process, we will also undertake to inform Mayor and Council of concerns relating to management’s implementation and maintenance of controls, and the effects of any such concerns on the overall strategy and scope of the audit. These concerns might arise from the nature, extent and frequency of management’s assessments of controls in place to detect fraud and misstatement, and of the risk that the consolidated financial statements may be misstated; from a failure by management to appropriately address significant deficiencies in controls identified in prior audits; and, from our evaluation of the Town’s control environment, and management’s competence and integrity.

Overall Reliance

Control Reliance Level Low/None Moderate High
Description Where we cannot rely on controls because they are weak or absent, or where it is deemed to be more efficient to carry out a high level of direct substantive tests of details. Audit evidence is primarily obtained through detailed verification procedures and sufficient substantive tests of details. Where there are some deficiencies in systems application or procedural controls, or where it is deemed to be inefficient to test systems application controls, but where we can test and rely on the management monitoring systems in place to detect and correct material misstatements in the financial reporting systems. Testing of controls is supplemented with a moderate level of substantive tests of details. Where a high degree of control is in place in the areas of management monitoring controls AND systems application and procedural controls. Our audit work focuses on testing both management monitoring and systems application and procedural controls, and is supplemented with a low level of substantive tests of details.
Planned Reliance
Dark green location pin icon
Dark green location pin icon

For the December 31, 2024 audit, we are planning to place low reliance on the Town’s controls. This level of reliance is consistent with the prior year, and will involve mainly substantive tests of details.

The amount of substantive work will be reduced for cycles where there are controls in place that MNP can test and rely on.

As part of our audit work we will update our understanding of the entity and its environment, the applicable financial reporting framework and the entity’s system of internal controls relevant to our audit of the principal transaction cycles, sufficient to identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements resulting from fraud or misstatement. This will be accomplished through inquiries with management and others within the entity, analytical procedures and observation and inspection. Furthermore, we will consider whether effective controls have been established to adequately respond to the risks arising from the use of IT or manual systems and test the operation of those controls to an extent sufficient to enable us to reduce our substantive work. Our review of the Town’s controls will not be sufficient to express an opinion as to their effectiveness or efficiency.

Although we will provide Mayor and Council with any information about significant deficiencies in internal control that have come to our attention, we may not be aware of all the significant deficiencies in internal control that do, in fact, exist.

Use of Specialists

To obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support our opinion, we intend to solicit the assistance of the City's Actuary. By communicating with the actuary and confirming the level of work performed by the actuary, the specialist will form part of our audit strategy in relation to employee future benefits.

We have sole responsibility for the audit opinion being expressed, and that responsibility is not reduced by our use of a specialist. We will, in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards, evaluate the competence, capabilities and objectivity of any specialists we employ to ensure their work is adequate for our purposes.

Inherent Limitations in the Auditing Process

An auditor cannot obtain absolute assurance that material misstatements in the consolidated financial statements will be detected due to factors such as the use of significant judgment regarding the gathering of evidence and the drawing of conclusions based on the audit evidence acquired; the use of testing of the data underlying the consolidated financial statements; inherent limitations of controls; and, the fact that much of the audit evidence available to the auditor is persuasive, rather than conclusive in nature.

Page 10–27

Because of the nature of fraud, including attempts at concealment through collusion and forgery, an audit designed and executed in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards may not detect a material fraud. While effective controls reduce the likelihood that misstatements will occur and remain undetected, they do not eliminate that possibility. Therefore, the auditor cannot guarantee that fraud, misstatements and non-compliance with laws and regulations, if present, will be detected when conducting an audit in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards.

The likelihood of not detecting material misstatements resulting from management fraud is greater than for employee fraud, because management is in a position to manipulate records, present fraudulent information or override controls.

We will inform the appropriate level of management or Mayor and Council with respect to identified:

  • Misstatements resulting from errors, other than clearly trivial misstatements;
  • Fraud, or any information obtained that indicates that fraud may exist;
  • Evidence obtained that indicates non-compliance or possible non-compliance with laws and regulations, other than that considered inconsequential;
  • Significant deficiencies in the design or implementation of controls to prevent and detect fraud or misstatement; and
  • Related party transactions that are not in the normal course of operations and that involve significant judgments made by management concerning measurement or disclosure.

Our concern as auditors is with material misstatements, and thus, we are not responsible for the detection of misstatements that are not material to the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.

"MADE IN CANADA And proud of it!" graphic
"MADE IN CANADA And proud of it!" graphic

At MNP we’re proud to be the national accounting, consulting and tax firm that is 100% Made in Canada.

Our history defines who we are and our approach to business. Being a Canadian firm has helped shape our values, our collaborative approach, and the way we work with our clients, engaging them every step of the way.

We have a unique perspective. Our decisions are made here — decisions that drive Canadian business and help us all achieve success — and we know the impact that our choices have on the cities and towns we call home.

Throughout our six decades of work, we’ve seen our communities are more than just a place we do business in. They’re a place where our families live, play, and thrive, and we work to make them the best places they can be.

Being 100% Canadian is something we wear proudly. This country provides us with great opportunities, and we’re here to help our clients seize the opportunities so we can create a brighter future for the generations to come.

Page 10–27
Extracted from: 2024 11 19 Council Agenda - Agenda - Pdf