This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.
Council Meeting/Documents/ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2021/15 - Dock Pilings – 335 Stewart Ave
Presentation

ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2021/15 - Dock Pilings – 335 Stewart Ave

November 2, 2021Pages 67–715 sections

A staff presentation summarizing the application for an Environmental Development Permit to replace and add dock pilings at 335 Stewart Ave.

1 CALL TO ORDER
335 Stewart AveVariance requested: setback from natural boundary to the sea from 15m to 0mPlan: replace one deteriorating creosote piling with 12” stainless steel and add one 12” galvanized piling

The purpose of this report is to introduce a new application for an Environmental Development Permit with variance to permit the construction of one new dock piling and one replacement piling for an existing dock.

Aerial map of the shoreline showing 335 Stewart Ave with the subject dock location circled in red
Aerial map of the shoreline showing 335 Stewart Ave with the subject dock location circled in red
Page 67–71

Requested Variances

The application requires the following variance:

  • A variance to the setback from the natural boundary to the sea from 15m to 0m for the placement of a dock piling.

The owners have been concerned that one piling is not enough to withstand the stresses of tides and storms. The plan is to replace the one deteriorating creosote piling with a 12” stainless steel piling and add one additional 12” galvanized piling.

Page 67–71

Environment

The Environmental Assessment from Swell Environmental concludes that it is not expected to cause negative impacts to the Development Permit Area provided that the DFO Best Management Practices are followed.

OCP Policy – Natural Watercourse and Shoreline DP Area

Policy direction around pilings within the OCP indicate that pilings are a preferred dock construction method, and creosote pilings are strongly discouraged. Galvanized pilings, as the applicant is proposing, is what the OCP policy asks for in dock construction.

  • vii. Piers and pilings and floating docks are preferred over solid-core piers.
  • viii. Docks should be constructed of stable materials that will not degrade over time. The use of unenclosed plastic foam or the use of creosote treated pilings is strongly discouraged.
Page 67–71

DISCUSSION

There are two issues for Council to consider:

  • The impact of the proposal on the environment.
  • The impact of the variance on the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties.

Impact on Environment

Given the responses from DFO, CFB Esquimalt and Swell Environmental Consulting, there is little risk to the environment from the proposal.

Impact on Use and Enjoyment of Neighbouring Properties

Given the location of the dock, staff is of the opinion that the visual impacts of an additional piling on neighbouring properties will be minimal.

Staff is supportive of the application.

Page 67–71

RECOMMENDATION

THAT Council approve Development Permit 2021/15;

AND THAT Development Permit 2021/15 include the following variance:

  • A variance to the setback from the natural boundary to the sea from 15m to 0m.
Page 67–71

Document Images

(1)
Document image
Extracted from: 2021 11 02 Council Agenda - Agenda - Pdf